Re: [Neo4j] Neo4j upcoming features importance poll
Uservoice seems great. If rapportive uses it, http://feedback.rapportive.com/forums/42557-general then it is good in my book. I think we should try it if we can integrate this with GIThub issues. Pablo, impressive feedback on http://www.doodle.com/wg8k77vwq6b654bv ! I think Mattias will be delighted that the supernode support is on top ;) Cheers, /peter neubauer GTalk: neubauer.peter Skype peter.neubauer Phone +46 704 106975 LinkedIn http://www.linkedin.com/in/neubauer Twitter http://twitter.com/peterneubauer http://www.neo4j.org - NOSQL for the Enterprise. http://startupbootcamp.org/ - Öresund - Innovation happens HERE. On Sat, Nov 19, 2011 at 9:29 PM, Peter Bell li...@pbell.com wrote: Uservoice might be a good fit. I used it for feature voting on as OSS project and it worked out pretty well... Sent from my iPhone On Nov 19, 2011, at 2:11 PM, Nigel Small ni...@nigelsmall.name wrote: Actually sounds like we may have finally found a use for Google Wave! :-P On 19 Nov 2011 13:09, Pablo Pareja ppar...@era7.com wrote: Yeah it'd be great having something more wiki-like that everyone could edit. I have no idea though about how could this be done Any ideas? Pablo On Sat, Nov 19, 2011 at 7:54 PM, Nigel Small ni...@nigelsmall.name wrote: How about something like Wufoo? http://www.wufoo.com/ http://www.wufoo.com/ *Nigel Small* Phone: +44 7814 638 246 Blog: http://nigelsmall.name/ GTalk: ni...@nigelsmall.name MSN: nasm...@live.co.uk Skype: technige Twitter: @technige https://twitter.com/#!/technige LinkedIn: http://uk.linkedin.com/in/nigelsmall On 19 November 2011 18:45, Peter Neubauer peter.neuba...@neotechnology.comwrote: I really like this. Is there any other transparent public method you poll, like a Google form that everyone can edit? On Nov 19, 2011 7:19 PM, Pablo Pareja ppar...@era7.com wrote: I just added a link for every possible upcoming feature and created an issue for those which didn't have one so far. Sorry for those who voted already but since the options changed, their vote was lost, could you please vote again? From now on every time we add a new feature to the poll we should create its respective issue before adding it. At least, whenever a new option is added, the votes for the rest of options are conserved, so we should be able update our votes just adding our vote (or not) to the new ones. Sorry for the inconvenience! Pablo On Sat, Nov 19, 2011 at 5:21 PM, Pablo Pareja ppar...@era7.com wrote: Ok, I just did that for the first one; the bad thing about this is that every time I edit one of the options, all the votes cast for it get lost and you have to edit your vote again... So maybe from now on I'd be better adding new features to the poll only once their respective issues has been risen in github. What do you think? Pablo On Sat, Nov 19, 2011 at 5:16 PM, Pablo Pareja ppar...@era7.com wrote: Yeah that'd be cool, if you give me the links I can put them as part of the options themselves (with bit.ly or something like that). Cheers, Pablo On Sat, Nov 19, 2011 at 1:30 PM, Peter Neubauer peter.neuba...@neotechnology.com wrote: Guys, This is great! Could you raise issues for these and we mitigate missing voting on Github with this, linking back to github for discussion? On Nov 19, 2011 1:09 PM, Pablo Pareja ppar...@era7.com wrote: @Linan get_or_create feature added ;) @Mattias I mean being required to specify a node type at creation time, (as how things are right now with relationships) On Sat, Nov 19, 2011 at 1:01 PM, Mattias Persson matt...@neotechnology.comwrote: hat exactly does mandatory node types mean? 2011/11/19 Pablo Pareja ppar...@era7.com Hi all, I was thinking it'd be cool to create a sort of a poll in order to know which features (that are missing right now...) are the most important ones for the community. I just did a quick google search for free online poll creation platforms and found doodle site, (btw do you know a better site to do this?). The address for the poll is: http://www.doodle.com/wg8k77vwq6b654bv So far I just added three features that came to my mind while I was creating it, so please say which features you're missing and I'll add them so that we can all vote for them or not. What do you think about all this? Cheers, Pablo -- Pablo Pareja Tobes My site http://about.me/pablopareja LinkedIn http://www.linkedin.com/in/pabloparejatobes Twitter http://www.twitter.com/pablopareja Creator of Bio4j -- http://www.bio4j.com http://www.ohnosequences.com ___ Neo4j mailing list User@lists.neo4j.org https://lists.neo4j.org/mailman/listinfo/user -- Mattias Persson, [matt...@neotechnology.com] Hacker, Neo Technology www.neotechnology.com ___ Neo4j mailing list
Re: [Neo4j] Neo4j upcoming features importance poll
Thank you all for participating and give your votes to the options you feel are more important. For sure it'd be great to have another platform to do this that could be somehow integrated with GitHub, ( I just created the poll with doodle because it was the one I found after a quick google search which could fit the needs at some level...) @Peter yeah I think he'll be :D Cheers, Pablo On Tue, Nov 22, 2011 at 3:51 PM, Peter Neubauer peter.neuba...@neotechnology.com wrote: Uservoice seems great. If rapportive uses it, http://feedback.rapportive.com/forums/42557-general then it is good in my book. I think we should try it if we can integrate this with GIThub issues. Pablo, impressive feedback on http://www.doodle.com/wg8k77vwq6b654bv ! I think Mattias will be delighted that the supernode support is on top ;) Cheers, /peter neubauer GTalk: neubauer.peter Skype peter.neubauer Phone +46 704 106975 LinkedIn http://www.linkedin.com/in/neubauer Twitter http://twitter.com/peterneubauer http://www.neo4j.org - NOSQL for the Enterprise. http://startupbootcamp.org/- Öresund - Innovation happens HERE. On Sat, Nov 19, 2011 at 9:29 PM, Peter Bell li...@pbell.com wrote: Uservoice might be a good fit. I used it for feature voting on as OSS project and it worked out pretty well... Sent from my iPhone On Nov 19, 2011, at 2:11 PM, Nigel Small ni...@nigelsmall.name wrote: Actually sounds like we may have finally found a use for Google Wave! :-P On 19 Nov 2011 13:09, Pablo Pareja ppar...@era7.com wrote: Yeah it'd be great having something more wiki-like that everyone could edit. I have no idea though about how could this be done Any ideas? Pablo On Sat, Nov 19, 2011 at 7:54 PM, Nigel Small ni...@nigelsmall.name wrote: How about something like Wufoo? http://www.wufoo.com/ http://www.wufoo.com/ *Nigel Small* Phone: +44 7814 638 246 Blog: http://nigelsmall.name/ GTalk: ni...@nigelsmall.name MSN: nasm...@live.co.uk Skype: technige Twitter: @technige https://twitter.com/#!/technige LinkedIn: http://uk.linkedin.com/in/nigelsmall On 19 November 2011 18:45, Peter Neubauer peter.neuba...@neotechnology.comwrote: I really like this. Is there any other transparent public method you poll, like a Google form that everyone can edit? On Nov 19, 2011 7:19 PM, Pablo Pareja ppar...@era7.com wrote: I just added a link for every possible upcoming feature and created an issue for those which didn't have one so far. Sorry for those who voted already but since the options changed, their vote was lost, could you please vote again? From now on every time we add a new feature to the poll we should create its respective issue before adding it. At least, whenever a new option is added, the votes for the rest of options are conserved, so we should be able update our votes just adding our vote (or not) to the new ones. Sorry for the inconvenience! Pablo On Sat, Nov 19, 2011 at 5:21 PM, Pablo Pareja ppar...@era7.com wrote: Ok, I just did that for the first one; the bad thing about this is that every time I edit one of the options, all the votes cast for it get lost and you have to edit your vote again... So maybe from now on I'd be better adding new features to the poll only once their respective issues has been risen in github. What do you think? Pablo On Sat, Nov 19, 2011 at 5:16 PM, Pablo Pareja ppar...@era7.com wrote: Yeah that'd be cool, if you give me the links I can put them as part of the options themselves (with bit.ly or something like that). Cheers, Pablo On Sat, Nov 19, 2011 at 1:30 PM, Peter Neubauer peter.neuba...@neotechnology.com wrote: Guys, This is great! Could you raise issues for these and we mitigate missing voting on Github with this, linking back to github for discussion? On Nov 19, 2011 1:09 PM, Pablo Pareja ppar...@era7.com wrote: @Linan get_or_create feature added ;) @Mattias I mean being required to specify a node type at creation time, (as how things are right now with relationships) On Sat, Nov 19, 2011 at 1:01 PM, Mattias Persson matt...@neotechnology.comwrote: hat exactly does mandatory node types mean? 2011/11/19 Pablo Pareja ppar...@era7.com Hi all, I was thinking it'd be cool to create a sort of a poll in order to know which features (that are missing right now...) are the most important ones for the community. I just did a quick google search for free online poll creation platforms and found doodle site, (btw do you know a better site to do this?). The address for the poll is: http://www.doodle.com/wg8k77vwq6b654bv So far I just added three features that came to my mind while I was creating it, so please say which features you're missing and I'll add them so
Re: [Neo4j] Neo4j upcoming features importance poll
I noticed work on supernodes being committed to GitHub. Looking forward seeing this and in 1.6-SNAPSHOT. I would like to test this sooner rather than later. The node#getDegree methods are a great addition. Niels From: peter.neuba...@neotechnology.com Date: Tue, 22 Nov 2011 15:51:15 +0100 To: user@lists.neo4j.org Subject: Re: [Neo4j] Neo4j upcoming features importance poll Uservoice seems great. If rapportive uses it, http://feedback.rapportive.com/forums/42557-general then it is good in my book. I think we should try it if we can integrate this with GIThub issues. Pablo, impressive feedback on http://www.doodle.com/wg8k77vwq6b654bv ! I think Mattias will be delighted that the supernode support is on top ;) Cheers, /peter neubauer GTalk: neubauer.peter Skype peter.neubauer Phone +46 704 106975 LinkedIn http://www.linkedin.com/in/neubauer Twitter http://twitter.com/peterneubauer http://www.neo4j.org - NOSQL for the Enterprise. http://startupbootcamp.org/- Öresund - Innovation happens HERE. On Sat, Nov 19, 2011 at 9:29 PM, Peter Bell li...@pbell.com wrote: Uservoice might be a good fit. I used it for feature voting on as OSS project and it worked out pretty well... Sent from my iPhone On Nov 19, 2011, at 2:11 PM, Nigel Small ni...@nigelsmall.name wrote: Actually sounds like we may have finally found a use for Google Wave! :-P On 19 Nov 2011 13:09, Pablo Pareja ppar...@era7.com wrote: Yeah it'd be great having something more wiki-like that everyone could edit. I have no idea though about how could this be done Any ideas? Pablo On Sat, Nov 19, 2011 at 7:54 PM, Nigel Small ni...@nigelsmall.name wrote: How about something like Wufoo? http://www.wufoo.com/ http://www.wufoo.com/ *Nigel Small* Phone: +44 7814 638 246 Blog: http://nigelsmall.name/ GTalk: ni...@nigelsmall.name MSN: nasm...@live.co.uk Skype: technige Twitter: @technige https://twitter.com/#!/technige LinkedIn: http://uk.linkedin.com/in/nigelsmall On 19 November 2011 18:45, Peter Neubauer peter.neuba...@neotechnology.comwrote: I really like this. Is there any other transparent public method you poll, like a Google form that everyone can edit? On Nov 19, 2011 7:19 PM, Pablo Pareja ppar...@era7.com wrote: I just added a link for every possible upcoming feature and created an issue for those which didn't have one so far. Sorry for those who voted already but since the options changed, their vote was lost, could you please vote again? From now on every time we add a new feature to the poll we should create its respective issue before adding it. At least, whenever a new option is added, the votes for the rest of options are conserved, so we should be able update our votes just adding our vote (or not) to the new ones. Sorry for the inconvenience! Pablo On Sat, Nov 19, 2011 at 5:21 PM, Pablo Pareja ppar...@era7.com wrote: Ok, I just did that for the first one; the bad thing about this is that every time I edit one of the options, all the votes cast for it get lost and you have to edit your vote again... So maybe from now on I'd be better adding new features to the poll only once their respective issues has been risen in github. What do you think? Pablo On Sat, Nov 19, 2011 at 5:16 PM, Pablo Pareja ppar...@era7.com wrote: Yeah that'd be cool, if you give me the links I can put them as part of the options themselves (with bit.ly or something like that). Cheers, Pablo On Sat, Nov 19, 2011 at 1:30 PM, Peter Neubauer peter.neuba...@neotechnology.com wrote: Guys, This is great! Could you raise issues for these and we mitigate missing voting on Github with this, linking back to github for discussion? On Nov 19, 2011 1:09 PM, Pablo Pareja ppar...@era7.com wrote: @Linan get_or_create feature added ;) @Mattias I mean being required to specify a node type at creation time, (as how things are right now with relationships) On Sat, Nov 19, 2011 at 1:01 PM, Mattias Persson matt...@neotechnology.comwrote: hat exactly does mandatory node types mean? 2011/11/19 Pablo Pareja ppar...@era7.com Hi all, I was thinking it'd be cool to create a sort of a poll in order to know which features (that are missing right now...) are the most important ones for the community. I just did a quick google search for free online poll creation platforms and found doodle site, (btw do you know a better site to do this?). The address for the poll is: http://www.doodle.com/wg8k77vwq6b654bv So far I just added three features that came to my mind while I was creating it, so please say which features you're missing and I'll add them so that we can all vote for them or not. What do you think about all this? Cheers
[Neo4j] Neo4j upcoming features importance poll
Hi all, I was thinking it'd be cool to create a sort of a poll in order to know which features (that are missing right now...) are the most important ones for the community. I just did a quick google search for free online poll creation platforms and found doodle site, (btw do you know a better site to do this?). The address for the poll is: http://www.doodle.com/wg8k77vwq6b654bv So far I just added three features that came to my mind while I was creating it, so please say which features you're missing and I'll add them so that we can all vote for them or not. What do you think about all this? Cheers, Pablo -- Pablo Pareja Tobes My site http://about.me/pablopareja LinkedInhttp://www.linkedin.com/in/pabloparejatobes Twitter http://www.twitter.com/pablopareja Creator of Bio4j -- http://www.bio4j.com http://www.ohnosequences.com ___ Neo4j mailing list User@lists.neo4j.org https://lists.neo4j.org/mailman/listinfo/user
Re: [Neo4j] Neo4j upcoming features importance poll
the top feature i want: node insertion with checking of uniq external id: get_or_create On Sat, Nov 19, 2011 at 11:39 AM, Pablo Pareja ppar...@era7.com wrote: Hi all, I was thinking it'd be cool to create a sort of a poll in order to know which features (that are missing right now...) are the most important ones for the community. I just did a quick google search for free online poll creation platforms and found doodle site, (btw do you know a better site to do this?). The address for the poll is: http://www.doodle.com/wg8k77vwq6b654bv So far I just added three features that came to my mind while I was creating it, so please say which features you're missing and I'll add them so that we can all vote for them or not. What do you think about all this? Cheers, Pablo -- Pablo Pareja Tobes My site http://about.me/pablopareja LinkedIn http://www.linkedin.com/in/pabloparejatobes Twitter http://www.twitter.com/pablopareja Creator of Bio4j -- http://www.bio4j.com http://www.ohnosequences.com ___ Neo4j mailing list User@lists.neo4j.org https://lists.neo4j.org/mailman/listinfo/user -- Best wishes, Linan Wang Architect, Programmer, PhD ___ Neo4j mailing list User@lists.neo4j.org https://lists.neo4j.org/mailman/listinfo/user
Re: [Neo4j] Neo4j upcoming features importance poll
hat exactly does mandatory node types mean? 2011/11/19 Pablo Pareja ppar...@era7.com Hi all, I was thinking it'd be cool to create a sort of a poll in order to know which features (that are missing right now...) are the most important ones for the community. I just did a quick google search for free online poll creation platforms and found doodle site, (btw do you know a better site to do this?). The address for the poll is: http://www.doodle.com/wg8k77vwq6b654bv So far I just added three features that came to my mind while I was creating it, so please say which features you're missing and I'll add them so that we can all vote for them or not. What do you think about all this? Cheers, Pablo -- Pablo Pareja Tobes My site http://about.me/pablopareja LinkedInhttp://www.linkedin.com/in/pabloparejatobes Twitter http://www.twitter.com/pablopareja Creator of Bio4j -- http://www.bio4j.com http://www.ohnosequences.com ___ Neo4j mailing list User@lists.neo4j.org https://lists.neo4j.org/mailman/listinfo/user -- Mattias Persson, [matt...@neotechnology.com] Hacker, Neo Technology www.neotechnology.com ___ Neo4j mailing list User@lists.neo4j.org https://lists.neo4j.org/mailman/listinfo/user
Re: [Neo4j] Neo4j upcoming features importance poll
Guys, This is great! Could you raise issues for these and we mitigate missing voting on Github with this, linking back to github for discussion? On Nov 19, 2011 1:09 PM, Pablo Pareja ppar...@era7.com wrote: @Linan get_or_create feature added ;) @Mattias I mean being required to specify a node type at creation time, (as how things are right now with relationships) On Sat, Nov 19, 2011 at 1:01 PM, Mattias Persson matt...@neotechnology.comwrote: hat exactly does mandatory node types mean? 2011/11/19 Pablo Pareja ppar...@era7.com Hi all, I was thinking it'd be cool to create a sort of a poll in order to know which features (that are missing right now...) are the most important ones for the community. I just did a quick google search for free online poll creation platforms and found doodle site, (btw do you know a better site to do this?). The address for the poll is: http://www.doodle.com/wg8k77vwq6b654bv So far I just added three features that came to my mind while I was creating it, so please say which features you're missing and I'll add them so that we can all vote for them or not. What do you think about all this? Cheers, Pablo -- Pablo Pareja Tobes My site http://about.me/pablopareja LinkedInhttp://www.linkedin.com/in/pabloparejatobes Twitter http://www.twitter.com/pablopareja Creator of Bio4j -- http://www.bio4j.com http://www.ohnosequences.com ___ Neo4j mailing list User@lists.neo4j.org https://lists.neo4j.org/mailman/listinfo/user -- Mattias Persson, [matt...@neotechnology.com] Hacker, Neo Technology www.neotechnology.com ___ Neo4j mailing list User@lists.neo4j.org https://lists.neo4j.org/mailman/listinfo/user -- Pablo Pareja Tobes My site http://about.me/pablopareja LinkedInhttp://www.linkedin.com/in/pabloparejatobes Twitter http://www.twitter.com/pablopareja Creator of Bio4j -- http://www.bio4j.com http://www.ohnosequences.com ___ Neo4j mailing list User@lists.neo4j.org https://lists.neo4j.org/mailman/listinfo/user ___ Neo4j mailing list User@lists.neo4j.org https://lists.neo4j.org/mailman/listinfo/user
Re: [Neo4j] Neo4j upcoming features importance poll
Yeah that'd be cool, if you give me the links I can put them as part of the options themselves (with bit.ly or something like that). Cheers, Pablo On Sat, Nov 19, 2011 at 1:30 PM, Peter Neubauer peter.neuba...@neotechnology.com wrote: Guys, This is great! Could you raise issues for these and we mitigate missing voting on Github with this, linking back to github for discussion? On Nov 19, 2011 1:09 PM, Pablo Pareja ppar...@era7.com wrote: @Linan get_or_create feature added ;) @Mattias I mean being required to specify a node type at creation time, (as how things are right now with relationships) On Sat, Nov 19, 2011 at 1:01 PM, Mattias Persson matt...@neotechnology.comwrote: hat exactly does mandatory node types mean? 2011/11/19 Pablo Pareja ppar...@era7.com Hi all, I was thinking it'd be cool to create a sort of a poll in order to know which features (that are missing right now...) are the most important ones for the community. I just did a quick google search for free online poll creation platforms and found doodle site, (btw do you know a better site to do this?). The address for the poll is: http://www.doodle.com/wg8k77vwq6b654bv So far I just added three features that came to my mind while I was creating it, so please say which features you're missing and I'll add them so that we can all vote for them or not. What do you think about all this? Cheers, Pablo -- Pablo Pareja Tobes My site http://about.me/pablopareja LinkedInhttp://www.linkedin.com/in/pabloparejatobes Twitter http://www.twitter.com/pablopareja Creator of Bio4j -- http://www.bio4j.com http://www.ohnosequences.com ___ Neo4j mailing list User@lists.neo4j.org https://lists.neo4j.org/mailman/listinfo/user -- Mattias Persson, [matt...@neotechnology.com] Hacker, Neo Technology www.neotechnology.com ___ Neo4j mailing list User@lists.neo4j.org https://lists.neo4j.org/mailman/listinfo/user -- Pablo Pareja Tobes My site http://about.me/pablopareja LinkedInhttp://www.linkedin.com/in/pabloparejatobes Twitter http://www.twitter.com/pablopareja Creator of Bio4j -- http://www.bio4j.com http://www.ohnosequences.com ___ Neo4j mailing list User@lists.neo4j.org https://lists.neo4j.org/mailman/listinfo/user ___ Neo4j mailing list User@lists.neo4j.org https://lists.neo4j.org/mailman/listinfo/user -- Pablo Pareja Tobes My site http://about.me/pablopareja LinkedInhttp://www.linkedin.com/in/pabloparejatobes Twitter http://www.twitter.com/pablopareja Creator of Bio4j -- http://www.bio4j.com http://www.ohnosequences.com ___ Neo4j mailing list User@lists.neo4j.org https://lists.neo4j.org/mailman/listinfo/user
Re: [Neo4j] Neo4j upcoming features importance poll
Ok, I just did that for the first one; the bad thing about this is that every time I edit one of the options, all the votes cast for it get lost and you have to edit your vote again... So maybe from now on I'd be better adding new features to the poll only once their respective issues has been risen in github. What do you think? Pablo On Sat, Nov 19, 2011 at 5:16 PM, Pablo Pareja ppar...@era7.com wrote: Yeah that'd be cool, if you give me the links I can put them as part of the options themselves (with bit.ly or something like that). Cheers, Pablo On Sat, Nov 19, 2011 at 1:30 PM, Peter Neubauer peter.neuba...@neotechnology.com wrote: Guys, This is great! Could you raise issues for these and we mitigate missing voting on Github with this, linking back to github for discussion? On Nov 19, 2011 1:09 PM, Pablo Pareja ppar...@era7.com wrote: @Linan get_or_create feature added ;) @Mattias I mean being required to specify a node type at creation time, (as how things are right now with relationships) On Sat, Nov 19, 2011 at 1:01 PM, Mattias Persson matt...@neotechnology.comwrote: hat exactly does mandatory node types mean? 2011/11/19 Pablo Pareja ppar...@era7.com Hi all, I was thinking it'd be cool to create a sort of a poll in order to know which features (that are missing right now...) are the most important ones for the community. I just did a quick google search for free online poll creation platforms and found doodle site, (btw do you know a better site to do this?). The address for the poll is: http://www.doodle.com/wg8k77vwq6b654bv So far I just added three features that came to my mind while I was creating it, so please say which features you're missing and I'll add them so that we can all vote for them or not. What do you think about all this? Cheers, Pablo -- Pablo Pareja Tobes My site http://about.me/pablopareja LinkedInhttp://www.linkedin.com/in/pabloparejatobes Twitter http://www.twitter.com/pablopareja Creator of Bio4j -- http://www.bio4j.com http://www.ohnosequences.com ___ Neo4j mailing list User@lists.neo4j.org https://lists.neo4j.org/mailman/listinfo/user -- Mattias Persson, [matt...@neotechnology.com] Hacker, Neo Technology www.neotechnology.com ___ Neo4j mailing list User@lists.neo4j.org https://lists.neo4j.org/mailman/listinfo/user -- Pablo Pareja Tobes My site http://about.me/pablopareja LinkedInhttp://www.linkedin.com/in/pabloparejatobes Twitter http://www.twitter.com/pablopareja Creator of Bio4j -- http://www.bio4j.com http://www.ohnosequences.com ___ Neo4j mailing list User@lists.neo4j.org https://lists.neo4j.org/mailman/listinfo/user ___ Neo4j mailing list User@lists.neo4j.org https://lists.neo4j.org/mailman/listinfo/user -- Pablo Pareja Tobes My site http://about.me/pablopareja LinkedInhttp://www.linkedin.com/in/pabloparejatobes Twitter http://www.twitter.com/pablopareja Creator of Bio4j -- http://www.bio4j.com http://www.ohnosequences.com -- Pablo Pareja Tobes My site http://about.me/pablopareja LinkedInhttp://www.linkedin.com/in/pabloparejatobes Twitter http://www.twitter.com/pablopareja Creator of Bio4j -- http://www.bio4j.com http://www.ohnosequences.com ___ Neo4j mailing list User@lists.neo4j.org https://lists.neo4j.org/mailman/listinfo/user
Re: [Neo4j] Neo4j upcoming features importance poll
I just added a link for every possible upcoming feature and created an issue for those which didn't have one so far. Sorry for those who voted already but since the options changed, their vote was lost, could you please vote again? From now on every time we add a new feature to the poll we should create its respective issue before adding it. At least, whenever a new option is added, the votes for the rest of options are conserved, so we should be able update our votes just adding our vote (or not) to the new ones. Sorry for the inconvenience! Pablo On Sat, Nov 19, 2011 at 5:21 PM, Pablo Pareja ppar...@era7.com wrote: Ok, I just did that for the first one; the bad thing about this is that every time I edit one of the options, all the votes cast for it get lost and you have to edit your vote again... So maybe from now on I'd be better adding new features to the poll only once their respective issues has been risen in github. What do you think? Pablo On Sat, Nov 19, 2011 at 5:16 PM, Pablo Pareja ppar...@era7.com wrote: Yeah that'd be cool, if you give me the links I can put them as part of the options themselves (with bit.ly or something like that). Cheers, Pablo On Sat, Nov 19, 2011 at 1:30 PM, Peter Neubauer peter.neuba...@neotechnology.com wrote: Guys, This is great! Could you raise issues for these and we mitigate missing voting on Github with this, linking back to github for discussion? On Nov 19, 2011 1:09 PM, Pablo Pareja ppar...@era7.com wrote: @Linan get_or_create feature added ;) @Mattias I mean being required to specify a node type at creation time, (as how things are right now with relationships) On Sat, Nov 19, 2011 at 1:01 PM, Mattias Persson matt...@neotechnology.comwrote: hat exactly does mandatory node types mean? 2011/11/19 Pablo Pareja ppar...@era7.com Hi all, I was thinking it'd be cool to create a sort of a poll in order to know which features (that are missing right now...) are the most important ones for the community. I just did a quick google search for free online poll creation platforms and found doodle site, (btw do you know a better site to do this?). The address for the poll is: http://www.doodle.com/wg8k77vwq6b654bv So far I just added three features that came to my mind while I was creating it, so please say which features you're missing and I'll add them so that we can all vote for them or not. What do you think about all this? Cheers, Pablo -- Pablo Pareja Tobes My site http://about.me/pablopareja LinkedInhttp://www.linkedin.com/in/pabloparejatobes Twitter http://www.twitter.com/pablopareja Creator of Bio4j -- http://www.bio4j.com http://www.ohnosequences.com ___ Neo4j mailing list User@lists.neo4j.org https://lists.neo4j.org/mailman/listinfo/user -- Mattias Persson, [matt...@neotechnology.com] Hacker, Neo Technology www.neotechnology.com ___ Neo4j mailing list User@lists.neo4j.org https://lists.neo4j.org/mailman/listinfo/user -- Pablo Pareja Tobes My site http://about.me/pablopareja LinkedInhttp://www.linkedin.com/in/pabloparejatobes Twitter http://www.twitter.com/pablopareja Creator of Bio4j -- http://www.bio4j.com http://www.ohnosequences.com ___ Neo4j mailing list User@lists.neo4j.org https://lists.neo4j.org/mailman/listinfo/user ___ Neo4j mailing list User@lists.neo4j.org https://lists.neo4j.org/mailman/listinfo/user -- Pablo Pareja Tobes My site http://about.me/pablopareja LinkedInhttp://www.linkedin.com/in/pabloparejatobes Twitter http://www.twitter.com/pablopareja Creator of Bio4j -- http://www.bio4j.com http://www.ohnosequences.com -- Pablo Pareja Tobes My site http://about.me/pablopareja LinkedInhttp://www.linkedin.com/in/pabloparejatobes Twitter http://www.twitter.com/pablopareja Creator of Bio4j -- http://www.bio4j.com http://www.ohnosequences.com -- Pablo Pareja Tobes My site http://about.me/pablopareja LinkedInhttp://www.linkedin.com/in/pabloparejatobes Twitter http://www.twitter.com/pablopareja Creator of Bio4j -- http://www.bio4j.com http://www.ohnosequences.com ___ Neo4j mailing list User@lists.neo4j.org https://lists.neo4j.org/mailman/listinfo/user
Re: [Neo4j] Neo4j upcoming features importance poll
I really like this. Is there any other transparent public method you poll, like a Google form that everyone can edit? On Nov 19, 2011 7:19 PM, Pablo Pareja ppar...@era7.com wrote: I just added a link for every possible upcoming feature and created an issue for those which didn't have one so far. Sorry for those who voted already but since the options changed, their vote was lost, could you please vote again? From now on every time we add a new feature to the poll we should create its respective issue before adding it. At least, whenever a new option is added, the votes for the rest of options are conserved, so we should be able update our votes just adding our vote (or not) to the new ones. Sorry for the inconvenience! Pablo On Sat, Nov 19, 2011 at 5:21 PM, Pablo Pareja ppar...@era7.com wrote: Ok, I just did that for the first one; the bad thing about this is that every time I edit one of the options, all the votes cast for it get lost and you have to edit your vote again... So maybe from now on I'd be better adding new features to the poll only once their respective issues has been risen in github. What do you think? Pablo On Sat, Nov 19, 2011 at 5:16 PM, Pablo Pareja ppar...@era7.com wrote: Yeah that'd be cool, if you give me the links I can put them as part of the options themselves (with bit.ly or something like that). Cheers, Pablo On Sat, Nov 19, 2011 at 1:30 PM, Peter Neubauer peter.neuba...@neotechnology.com wrote: Guys, This is great! Could you raise issues for these and we mitigate missing voting on Github with this, linking back to github for discussion? On Nov 19, 2011 1:09 PM, Pablo Pareja ppar...@era7.com wrote: @Linan get_or_create feature added ;) @Mattias I mean being required to specify a node type at creation time, (as how things are right now with relationships) On Sat, Nov 19, 2011 at 1:01 PM, Mattias Persson matt...@neotechnology.comwrote: hat exactly does mandatory node types mean? 2011/11/19 Pablo Pareja ppar...@era7.com Hi all, I was thinking it'd be cool to create a sort of a poll in order to know which features (that are missing right now...) are the most important ones for the community. I just did a quick google search for free online poll creation platforms and found doodle site, (btw do you know a better site to do this?). The address for the poll is: http://www.doodle.com/wg8k77vwq6b654bv So far I just added three features that came to my mind while I was creating it, so please say which features you're missing and I'll add them so that we can all vote for them or not. What do you think about all this? Cheers, Pablo -- Pablo Pareja Tobes My site http://about.me/pablopareja LinkedInhttp://www.linkedin.com/in/pabloparejatobes Twitter http://www.twitter.com/pablopareja Creator of Bio4j -- http://www.bio4j.com http://www.ohnosequences.com ___ Neo4j mailing list User@lists.neo4j.org https://lists.neo4j.org/mailman/listinfo/user -- Mattias Persson, [matt...@neotechnology.com] Hacker, Neo Technology www.neotechnology.com ___ Neo4j mailing list User@lists.neo4j.org https://lists.neo4j.org/mailman/listinfo/user -- Pablo Pareja Tobes My site http://about.me/pablopareja LinkedInhttp://www.linkedin.com/in/pabloparejatobes Twitter http://www.twitter.com/pablopareja Creator of Bio4j -- http://www.bio4j.com http://www.ohnosequences.com ___ Neo4j mailing list User@lists.neo4j.org https://lists.neo4j.org/mailman/listinfo/user ___ Neo4j mailing list User@lists.neo4j.org https://lists.neo4j.org/mailman/listinfo/user -- Pablo Pareja Tobes My site http://about.me/pablopareja LinkedInhttp://www.linkedin.com/in/pabloparejatobes Twitter http://www.twitter.com/pablopareja Creator of Bio4j -- http://www.bio4j.com http://www.ohnosequences.com -- Pablo Pareja Tobes My site http://about.me/pablopareja LinkedInhttp://www.linkedin.com/in/pabloparejatobes Twitter http://www.twitter.com/pablopareja Creator of Bio4j -- http://www.bio4j.com http://www.ohnosequences.com -- Pablo Pareja Tobes My site http://about.me/pablopareja LinkedInhttp://www.linkedin.com/in/pabloparejatobes Twitter http://www.twitter.com/pablopareja Creator of Bio4j -- http://www.bio4j.com http://www.ohnosequences.com ___ Neo4j mailing list User@lists.neo4j.org
Re: [Neo4j] Neo4j upcoming features importance poll
How about something like Wufoo? http://www.wufoo.com/ http://www.wufoo.com/ *Nigel Small* Phone: +44 7814 638 246 Blog: http://nigelsmall.name/ GTalk: ni...@nigelsmall.name MSN: nasm...@live.co.uk Skype: technige Twitter: @technige https://twitter.com/#!/technige LinkedIn: http://uk.linkedin.com/in/nigelsmall On 19 November 2011 18:45, Peter Neubauer peter.neuba...@neotechnology.comwrote: I really like this. Is there any other transparent public method you poll, like a Google form that everyone can edit? On Nov 19, 2011 7:19 PM, Pablo Pareja ppar...@era7.com wrote: I just added a link for every possible upcoming feature and created an issue for those which didn't have one so far. Sorry for those who voted already but since the options changed, their vote was lost, could you please vote again? From now on every time we add a new feature to the poll we should create its respective issue before adding it. At least, whenever a new option is added, the votes for the rest of options are conserved, so we should be able update our votes just adding our vote (or not) to the new ones. Sorry for the inconvenience! Pablo On Sat, Nov 19, 2011 at 5:21 PM, Pablo Pareja ppar...@era7.com wrote: Ok, I just did that for the first one; the bad thing about this is that every time I edit one of the options, all the votes cast for it get lost and you have to edit your vote again... So maybe from now on I'd be better adding new features to the poll only once their respective issues has been risen in github. What do you think? Pablo On Sat, Nov 19, 2011 at 5:16 PM, Pablo Pareja ppar...@era7.com wrote: Yeah that'd be cool, if you give me the links I can put them as part of the options themselves (with bit.ly or something like that). Cheers, Pablo On Sat, Nov 19, 2011 at 1:30 PM, Peter Neubauer peter.neuba...@neotechnology.com wrote: Guys, This is great! Could you raise issues for these and we mitigate missing voting on Github with this, linking back to github for discussion? On Nov 19, 2011 1:09 PM, Pablo Pareja ppar...@era7.com wrote: @Linan get_or_create feature added ;) @Mattias I mean being required to specify a node type at creation time, (as how things are right now with relationships) On Sat, Nov 19, 2011 at 1:01 PM, Mattias Persson matt...@neotechnology.comwrote: hat exactly does mandatory node types mean? 2011/11/19 Pablo Pareja ppar...@era7.com Hi all, I was thinking it'd be cool to create a sort of a poll in order to know which features (that are missing right now...) are the most important ones for the community. I just did a quick google search for free online poll creation platforms and found doodle site, (btw do you know a better site to do this?). The address for the poll is: http://www.doodle.com/wg8k77vwq6b654bv So far I just added three features that came to my mind while I was creating it, so please say which features you're missing and I'll add them so that we can all vote for them or not. What do you think about all this? Cheers, Pablo -- Pablo Pareja Tobes My site http://about.me/pablopareja LinkedInhttp://www.linkedin.com/in/pabloparejatobes Twitter http://www.twitter.com/pablopareja Creator of Bio4j -- http://www.bio4j.com http://www.ohnosequences.com ___ Neo4j mailing list User@lists.neo4j.org https://lists.neo4j.org/mailman/listinfo/user -- Mattias Persson, [matt...@neotechnology.com] Hacker, Neo Technology www.neotechnology.com ___ Neo4j mailing list User@lists.neo4j.org https://lists.neo4j.org/mailman/listinfo/user -- Pablo Pareja Tobes My site http://about.me/pablopareja LinkedInhttp://www.linkedin.com/in/pabloparejatobes Twitter http://www.twitter.com/pablopareja Creator of Bio4j -- http://www.bio4j.com http://www.ohnosequences.com ___ Neo4j mailing list User@lists.neo4j.org https://lists.neo4j.org/mailman/listinfo/user ___ Neo4j mailing list User@lists.neo4j.org https://lists.neo4j.org/mailman/listinfo/user -- Pablo Pareja Tobes My site http://about.me/pablopareja LinkedInhttp://www.linkedin.com/in/pabloparejatobes Twitter http://www.twitter.com/pablopareja Creator of Bio4j -- http://www.bio4j.com http://www.ohnosequences.com -- Pablo Pareja Tobes My site
Re: [Neo4j] Neo4j upcoming features importance poll
Yeah it'd be great having something more wiki-like that everyone could edit. I have no idea though about how could this be done Any ideas? Pablo On Sat, Nov 19, 2011 at 7:54 PM, Nigel Small ni...@nigelsmall.name wrote: How about something like Wufoo? http://www.wufoo.com/ http://www.wufoo.com/ *Nigel Small* Phone: +44 7814 638 246 Blog: http://nigelsmall.name/ GTalk: ni...@nigelsmall.name MSN: nasm...@live.co.uk Skype: technige Twitter: @technige https://twitter.com/#!/technige LinkedIn: http://uk.linkedin.com/in/nigelsmall On 19 November 2011 18:45, Peter Neubauer peter.neuba...@neotechnology.comwrote: I really like this. Is there any other transparent public method you poll, like a Google form that everyone can edit? On Nov 19, 2011 7:19 PM, Pablo Pareja ppar...@era7.com wrote: I just added a link for every possible upcoming feature and created an issue for those which didn't have one so far. Sorry for those who voted already but since the options changed, their vote was lost, could you please vote again? From now on every time we add a new feature to the poll we should create its respective issue before adding it. At least, whenever a new option is added, the votes for the rest of options are conserved, so we should be able update our votes just adding our vote (or not) to the new ones. Sorry for the inconvenience! Pablo On Sat, Nov 19, 2011 at 5:21 PM, Pablo Pareja ppar...@era7.com wrote: Ok, I just did that for the first one; the bad thing about this is that every time I edit one of the options, all the votes cast for it get lost and you have to edit your vote again... So maybe from now on I'd be better adding new features to the poll only once their respective issues has been risen in github. What do you think? Pablo On Sat, Nov 19, 2011 at 5:16 PM, Pablo Pareja ppar...@era7.com wrote: Yeah that'd be cool, if you give me the links I can put them as part of the options themselves (with bit.ly or something like that). Cheers, Pablo On Sat, Nov 19, 2011 at 1:30 PM, Peter Neubauer peter.neuba...@neotechnology.com wrote: Guys, This is great! Could you raise issues for these and we mitigate missing voting on Github with this, linking back to github for discussion? On Nov 19, 2011 1:09 PM, Pablo Pareja ppar...@era7.com wrote: @Linan get_or_create feature added ;) @Mattias I mean being required to specify a node type at creation time, (as how things are right now with relationships) On Sat, Nov 19, 2011 at 1:01 PM, Mattias Persson matt...@neotechnology.comwrote: hat exactly does mandatory node types mean? 2011/11/19 Pablo Pareja ppar...@era7.com Hi all, I was thinking it'd be cool to create a sort of a poll in order to know which features (that are missing right now...) are the most important ones for the community. I just did a quick google search for free online poll creation platforms and found doodle site, (btw do you know a better site to do this?). The address for the poll is: http://www.doodle.com/wg8k77vwq6b654bv So far I just added three features that came to my mind while I was creating it, so please say which features you're missing and I'll add them so that we can all vote for them or not. What do you think about all this? Cheers, Pablo -- Pablo Pareja Tobes My site http://about.me/pablopareja LinkedInhttp://www.linkedin.com/in/pabloparejatobes Twitter http://www.twitter.com/pablopareja Creator of Bio4j -- http://www.bio4j.com http://www.ohnosequences.com ___ Neo4j mailing list User@lists.neo4j.org https://lists.neo4j.org/mailman/listinfo/user -- Mattias Persson, [matt...@neotechnology.com] Hacker, Neo Technology www.neotechnology.com ___ Neo4j mailing list User@lists.neo4j.org https://lists.neo4j.org/mailman/listinfo/user -- Pablo Pareja Tobes My site http://about.me/pablopareja LinkedInhttp://www.linkedin.com/in/pabloparejatobes Twitter http://www.twitter.com/pablopareja Creator of Bio4j -- http://www.bio4j.com http://www.ohnosequences.com ___ Neo4j mailing list User@lists.neo4j.org https://lists.neo4j.org/mailman/listinfo/user ___ Neo4j mailing list User@lists.neo4j.org
Re: [Neo4j] Neo4j upcoming features importance poll
Actually sounds like we may have finally found a use for Google Wave! :-P On 19 Nov 2011 13:09, Pablo Pareja ppar...@era7.com wrote: Yeah it'd be great having something more wiki-like that everyone could edit. I have no idea though about how could this be done Any ideas? Pablo On Sat, Nov 19, 2011 at 7:54 PM, Nigel Small ni...@nigelsmall.name wrote: How about something like Wufoo? http://www.wufoo.com/ http://www.wufoo.com/ *Nigel Small* Phone: +44 7814 638 246 Blog: http://nigelsmall.name/ GTalk: ni...@nigelsmall.name MSN: nasm...@live.co.uk Skype: technige Twitter: @technige https://twitter.com/#!/technige LinkedIn: http://uk.linkedin.com/in/nigelsmall On 19 November 2011 18:45, Peter Neubauer peter.neuba...@neotechnology.comwrote: I really like this. Is there any other transparent public method you poll, like a Google form that everyone can edit? On Nov 19, 2011 7:19 PM, Pablo Pareja ppar...@era7.com wrote: I just added a link for every possible upcoming feature and created an issue for those which didn't have one so far. Sorry for those who voted already but since the options changed, their vote was lost, could you please vote again? From now on every time we add a new feature to the poll we should create its respective issue before adding it. At least, whenever a new option is added, the votes for the rest of options are conserved, so we should be able update our votes just adding our vote (or not) to the new ones. Sorry for the inconvenience! Pablo On Sat, Nov 19, 2011 at 5:21 PM, Pablo Pareja ppar...@era7.com wrote: Ok, I just did that for the first one; the bad thing about this is that every time I edit one of the options, all the votes cast for it get lost and you have to edit your vote again... So maybe from now on I'd be better adding new features to the poll only once their respective issues has been risen in github. What do you think? Pablo On Sat, Nov 19, 2011 at 5:16 PM, Pablo Pareja ppar...@era7.com wrote: Yeah that'd be cool, if you give me the links I can put them as part of the options themselves (with bit.ly or something like that). Cheers, Pablo On Sat, Nov 19, 2011 at 1:30 PM, Peter Neubauer peter.neuba...@neotechnology.com wrote: Guys, This is great! Could you raise issues for these and we mitigate missing voting on Github with this, linking back to github for discussion? On Nov 19, 2011 1:09 PM, Pablo Pareja ppar...@era7.com wrote: @Linan get_or_create feature added ;) @Mattias I mean being required to specify a node type at creation time, (as how things are right now with relationships) On Sat, Nov 19, 2011 at 1:01 PM, Mattias Persson matt...@neotechnology.comwrote: hat exactly does mandatory node types mean? 2011/11/19 Pablo Pareja ppar...@era7.com Hi all, I was thinking it'd be cool to create a sort of a poll in order to know which features (that are missing right now...) are the most important ones for the community. I just did a quick google search for free online poll creation platforms and found doodle site, (btw do you know a better site to do this?). The address for the poll is: http://www.doodle.com/wg8k77vwq6b654bv So far I just added three features that came to my mind while I was creating it, so please say which features you're missing and I'll add them so that we can all vote for them or not. What do you think about all this? Cheers, Pablo -- Pablo Pareja Tobes My site http://about.me/pablopareja LinkedInhttp://www.linkedin.com/in/pabloparejatobes Twitter http://www.twitter.com/pablopareja Creator of Bio4j -- http://www.bio4j.com http://www.ohnosequences.com ___ Neo4j mailing list User@lists.neo4j.org https://lists.neo4j.org/mailman/listinfo/user -- Mattias Persson, [matt...@neotechnology.com] Hacker, Neo Technology www.neotechnology.com ___ Neo4j mailing list User@lists.neo4j.org https://lists.neo4j.org/mailman/listinfo/user -- Pablo Pareja Tobes My site http://about.me/pablopareja LinkedInhttp://www.linkedin.com/in/pabloparejatobes Twitter http://www.twitter.com/pablopareja Creator of Bio4j --
Re: [Neo4j] Neo4j upcoming features importance poll
LOL On Nov 19, 2011 8:12 PM, Nigel Small ni...@nigelsmall.name wrote: Actually sounds like we may have finally found a use for Google Wave! :-P On 19 Nov 2011 13:09, Pablo Pareja ppar...@era7.com wrote: Yeah it'd be great having something more wiki-like that everyone could edit. I have no idea though about how could this be done Any ideas? Pablo On Sat, Nov 19, 2011 at 7:54 PM, Nigel Small ni...@nigelsmall.name wrote: How about something like Wufoo? http://www.wufoo.com/ http://www.wufoo.com/ *Nigel Small* Phone: +44 7814 638 246 Blog: http://nigelsmall.name/ GTalk: ni...@nigelsmall.name MSN: nasm...@live.co.uk Skype: technige Twitter: @technige https://twitter.com/#!/technige LinkedIn: http://uk.linkedin.com/in/nigelsmall On 19 November 2011 18:45, Peter Neubauer peter.neuba...@neotechnology.comwrote: I really like this. Is there any other transparent public method you poll, like a Google form that everyone can edit? On Nov 19, 2011 7:19 PM, Pablo Pareja ppar...@era7.com wrote: I just added a link for every possible upcoming feature and created an issue for those which didn't have one so far. Sorry for those who voted already but since the options changed, their vote was lost, could you please vote again? From now on every time we add a new feature to the poll we should create its respective issue before adding it. At least, whenever a new option is added, the votes for the rest of options are conserved, so we should be able update our votes just adding our vote (or not) to the new ones. Sorry for the inconvenience! Pablo On Sat, Nov 19, 2011 at 5:21 PM, Pablo Pareja ppar...@era7.com wrote: Ok, I just did that for the first one; the bad thing about this is that every time I edit one of the options, all the votes cast for it get lost and you have to edit your vote again... So maybe from now on I'd be better adding new features to the poll only once their respective issues has been risen in github. What do you think? Pablo On Sat, Nov 19, 2011 at 5:16 PM, Pablo Pareja ppar...@era7.com wrote: Yeah that'd be cool, if you give me the links I can put them as part of the options themselves (with bit.ly or something like that). Cheers, Pablo On Sat, Nov 19, 2011 at 1:30 PM, Peter Neubauer peter.neuba...@neotechnology.com wrote: Guys, This is great! Could you raise issues for these and we mitigate missing voting on Github with this, linking back to github for discussion? On Nov 19, 2011 1:09 PM, Pablo Pareja ppar...@era7.com wrote: @Linan get_or_create feature added ;) @Mattias I mean being required to specify a node type at creation time, (as how things are right now with relationships) On Sat, Nov 19, 2011 at 1:01 PM, Mattias Persson matt...@neotechnology.comwrote: hat exactly does mandatory node types mean? 2011/11/19 Pablo Pareja ppar...@era7.com Hi all, I was thinking it'd be cool to create a sort of a poll in order to know which features (that are missing right now...) are the most important ones for the community. I just did a quick google search for free online poll creation platforms and found doodle site, (btw do you know a better site to do this?). The address for the poll is: http://www.doodle.com/wg8k77vwq6b654bv So far I just added three features that came to my mind while I was creating it, so please say which features you're missing and I'll add them so that we can all vote for them or not. What do you think about all this? Cheers, Pablo -- Pablo Pareja Tobes My site http://about.me/pablopareja LinkedInhttp://www.linkedin.com/in/pabloparejatobes Twitter http://www.twitter.com/pablopareja Creator of Bio4j -- http://www.bio4j.com http://www.ohnosequences.com ___ Neo4j mailing list User@lists.neo4j.org https://lists.neo4j.org/mailman/listinfo/user -- Mattias Persson, [matt...@neotechnology.com] Hacker, Neo Technology www.neotechnology.com ___ Neo4j mailing list User@lists.neo4j.org https://lists.neo4j.org/mailman/listinfo/user
Re: [Neo4j] Neo4j upcoming features importance poll
Uservoice might be a good fit. I used it for feature voting on as OSS project and it worked out pretty well... Sent from my iPhone On Nov 19, 2011, at 2:11 PM, Nigel Small ni...@nigelsmall.name wrote: Actually sounds like we may have finally found a use for Google Wave! :-P On 19 Nov 2011 13:09, Pablo Pareja ppar...@era7.com wrote: Yeah it'd be great having something more wiki-like that everyone could edit. I have no idea though about how could this be done Any ideas? Pablo On Sat, Nov 19, 2011 at 7:54 PM, Nigel Small ni...@nigelsmall.name wrote: How about something like Wufoo? http://www.wufoo.com/ http://www.wufoo.com/ *Nigel Small* Phone: +44 7814 638 246 Blog: http://nigelsmall.name/ GTalk: ni...@nigelsmall.name MSN: nasm...@live.co.uk Skype: technige Twitter: @technige https://twitter.com/#!/technige LinkedIn: http://uk.linkedin.com/in/nigelsmall On 19 November 2011 18:45, Peter Neubauer peter.neuba...@neotechnology.comwrote: I really like this. Is there any other transparent public method you poll, like a Google form that everyone can edit? On Nov 19, 2011 7:19 PM, Pablo Pareja ppar...@era7.com wrote: I just added a link for every possible upcoming feature and created an issue for those which didn't have one so far. Sorry for those who voted already but since the options changed, their vote was lost, could you please vote again? From now on every time we add a new feature to the poll we should create its respective issue before adding it. At least, whenever a new option is added, the votes for the rest of options are conserved, so we should be able update our votes just adding our vote (or not) to the new ones. Sorry for the inconvenience! Pablo On Sat, Nov 19, 2011 at 5:21 PM, Pablo Pareja ppar...@era7.com wrote: Ok, I just did that for the first one; the bad thing about this is that every time I edit one of the options, all the votes cast for it get lost and you have to edit your vote again... So maybe from now on I'd be better adding new features to the poll only once their respective issues has been risen in github. What do you think? Pablo On Sat, Nov 19, 2011 at 5:16 PM, Pablo Pareja ppar...@era7.com wrote: Yeah that'd be cool, if you give me the links I can put them as part of the options themselves (with bit.ly or something like that). Cheers, Pablo On Sat, Nov 19, 2011 at 1:30 PM, Peter Neubauer peter.neuba...@neotechnology.com wrote: Guys, This is great! Could you raise issues for these and we mitigate missing voting on Github with this, linking back to github for discussion? On Nov 19, 2011 1:09 PM, Pablo Pareja ppar...@era7.com wrote: @Linan get_or_create feature added ;) @Mattias I mean being required to specify a node type at creation time, (as how things are right now with relationships) On Sat, Nov 19, 2011 at 1:01 PM, Mattias Persson matt...@neotechnology.comwrote: hat exactly does mandatory node types mean? 2011/11/19 Pablo Pareja ppar...@era7.com Hi all, I was thinking it'd be cool to create a sort of a poll in order to know which features (that are missing right now...) are the most important ones for the community. I just did a quick google search for free online poll creation platforms and found doodle site, (btw do you know a better site to do this?). The address for the poll is: http://www.doodle.com/wg8k77vwq6b654bv So far I just added three features that came to my mind while I was creating it, so please say which features you're missing and I'll add them so that we can all vote for them or not. What do you think about all this? Cheers, Pablo -- Pablo Pareja Tobes My site http://about.me/pablopareja LinkedInhttp://www.linkedin.com/in/pabloparejatobes Twitter http://www.twitter.com/pablopareja Creator of Bio4j -- http://www.bio4j.com http://www.ohnosequences.com ___ Neo4j mailing list User@lists.neo4j.org https://lists.neo4j.org/mailman/listinfo/user -- Mattias Persson, [matt...@neotechnology.com] Hacker, Neo Technology www.neotechnology.com ___ Neo4j mailing list User@lists.neo4j.org https://lists.neo4j.org/mailman/listinfo/user -- Pablo Pareja Tobes My site http://about.me/pablopareja LinkedInhttp://www.linkedin.com/in/pabloparejatobes Twitter http://www.twitter.com/pablopareja Creator of Bio4j -- http://www.bio4j.com http://www.ohnosequences.com ___ Neo4j mailing list User@lists.neo4j.org https://lists.neo4j.org/mailman/listinfo/user ___ Neo4j mailing list User@lists.neo4j.org https://lists.neo4j.org/mailman/listinfo/user -- Pablo Pareja Tobes My site http://about.me/pablopareja LinkedIn
