Re: ActiveMQ In Jboss - Two Brokers Getting Created when using VM Protocol
On 23 May 2008, at 06:55, Kumar Ravella wrote: Hi All , There are two Brokers Getting Created while trying to use both VM and TCP Protocols.. I deployed ActiveMQ inside JBoss. - activemq-ra.rar. In my Brokre-Config i have made these setting for My Broker. Named it as Broker1 . Persistence set to false. And in transport Connector i have added both tcp://localhost:61616 vm://myvmbroker But only when i try to use these two URL's in my code . It is creating two brokers . Broker1 and myvmbroker Is this a normal Behavior .. ? Can't i make both connections running in single Broker ? Thanks Kumar Ravella - Thanks, Kumar Ravella -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/ActiveMQ-In-Jboss---Two-Brokers-Getting-Created-when-using-VM-Protocol-tp17419178s2354p17419178.html Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. So you don't need to add the vm:// connector explicitly - but if you do make sure its of the form vm://BrokerName e.g. vm://Broker1 When you client connects using the urI vm://Broker1 - it will look for a Broker called Broker1 in the VM and if there isn't a vm:// transport connector for that broker - one will be created for it. However, if there isn't a broker of that name - one will be spun up - which is what is happening with your configuration - when the broker registers the transport connector vm://myvmbroker - its spinning up another broker with the broker name myvmbroker cheers, Rob http://open.iona.com/products/enterprise-activemq http://rajdavies.blogspot.com/
Re: ActiveMQ In Jboss - Two Brokers Getting Created when using VM Protocol
Hi ,, When i searched archives the suggested solution is to use the same name for VM and Broker name in broker-config.xml .. If i use BrokerName as the logical name as same i get this error... javax.management.InstanceAlreadyExistsException: org.apache.activemq:BrokerName=broker1,Type=Broker alre ady registered. Any advice ? Thanks Kumar Kumar Ravella wrote: Hi All , There are two Brokers Getting Created while trying to use both VM and TCP Protocols.. I deployed ActiveMQ inside JBoss. - activemq-ra.rar. In my Brokre-Config i have made these setting for My Broker. Named it as Broker1 . Persistence set to false. And in transport Connector i have added both tcp://localhost:61616 vm://myvmbroker But only when i try to use these two URL's in my code . It is creating two brokers . Broker1 and myvmbroker Is this a normal Behavior .. ? Can't i make both connections running in single Broker ? Thanks Kumar Ravella - Thanks, Kumar Ravella -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/ActiveMQ-In-Jboss---Two-Brokers-Getting-Created-when-using-VM-Protocol-tp17419178s2354p17419485.html Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: ActiveMQ In Jboss - Two Brokers Getting Created when using VM Protocol
Are you still explicitly registering a vm:// connector on the broker ? - you shouldn't need to cheers, Rob On 23 May 2008, at 07:51, Kumar Ravella wrote: Hi ,, When i searched archives the suggested solution is to use the same name for VM and Broker name in broker-config.xml .. If i use BrokerName as the logical name as same i get this error... javax.management.InstanceAlreadyExistsException: org.apache.activemq:BrokerName=broker1,Type=Broker alre ady registered. Any advice ? Thanks Kumar Kumar Ravella wrote: Hi All , There are two Brokers Getting Created while trying to use both VM and TCP Protocols.. I deployed ActiveMQ inside JBoss. - activemq-ra.rar. In my Brokre-Config i have made these setting for My Broker. Named it as Broker1 . Persistence set to false. And in transport Connector i have added both tcp://localhost:61616 vm://myvmbroker But only when i try to use these two URL's in my code . It is creating two brokers . Broker1 and myvmbroker Is this a normal Behavior .. ? Can't i make both connections running in single Broker ? Thanks Kumar Ravella - Thanks, Kumar Ravella -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/ActiveMQ-In-Jboss---Two-Brokers-Getting-Created-when-using-VM-Protocol-tp17419178s2354p17419485.html Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: ActiveMQ In Jboss - Two Brokers Getting Created when using VM Protocol
HI , I have removed my VM Uri from the Broker-Config.xml and My broker name is broker1 .. In my code i am using my URI as vm://broker1 ... same as my broker name in Broker-Config.xml . But still i am getting this error.. Caused by: javax.management.InstanceAlreadyExistsException: org.apache.activemq:BrokerName=broker1,Type=Broker alr ady registered. - Kumar rajdavies wrote: Are you still explicitly registering a vm:// connector on the broker ? - you shouldn't need to cheers, Rob On 23 May 2008, at 07:51, Kumar Ravella wrote: Hi ,, When i searched archives the suggested solution is to use the same name for VM and Broker name in broker-config.xml .. If i use BrokerName as the logical name as same i get this error... javax.management.InstanceAlreadyExistsException: org.apache.activemq:BrokerName=broker1,Type=Broker alre ady registered. Any advice ? Thanks Kumar Kumar Ravella wrote: Hi All , There are two Brokers Getting Created while trying to use both VM and TCP Protocols.. I deployed ActiveMQ inside JBoss. - activemq-ra.rar. In my Brokre-Config i have made these setting for My Broker. Named it as Broker1 . Persistence set to false. And in transport Connector i have added both tcp://localhost:61616 vm://myvmbroker But only when i try to use these two URL's in my code . It is creating two brokers . Broker1 and myvmbroker Is this a normal Behavior .. ? Can't i make both connections running in single Broker ? Thanks Kumar Ravella - Thanks, Kumar Ravella -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/ActiveMQ-In-Jboss---Two-Brokers-Getting-Created-when-using-VM-Protocol-tp17419178s2354p17419485.html Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - Thanks, Kumar Ravella -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/ActiveMQ-In-Jboss---Two-Brokers-Getting-Created-when-using-VM-Protocol-tp17419178s2354p17421693.html Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
