回复: 关于vmware
网上有 key生成器，5.0和5.1的都有，很好找 百度一个就成了 zanghongtu2006 发件人： wanghaicheng2004 发送时间： 2013-07-08 10:17 收件人： cloudstack讨论组 主题： 关于vmware 想问下用过cloudstack+vsphere的兄弟，cloudstack是通过vCenter来管理esxi么？但是vCenter是需要授权的，只有60天的试用期，这个有什么办法解决么。 wanghaicheng2004
cloudstack????????????????????????????????????????
cloudstack ??cpu ??
二级存储虚拟机
我发现无论是基本网络还是高级网络，二级存储虚拟机都有两个管理网络的网卡，为什么要有两个，作用都是什么啊？ 祝好！ 苗华栋 基础软件 事业部 东软集团（大连）有限公司 大连市黄浦路901-4号 邮编：116085 手机： 135 9178 8936 Email：mia...@neusoft.com --- Confidentiality Notice: The information contained in this e-mail and any accompanying attachment(s) is intended only for the use of the intended recipient and may be confidential and/or privileged of Neusoft Corporation, its subsidiaries and/or its affiliates. If any reader of this communication is not the intended recipient, unauthorized use, forwarding, printing, storing, disclosure or copying is strictly prohibited, and may be unlawful.If you have received this communication in error,please immediately notify the sender by return e-mail, and delete the original message and all copies from your system. Thank you. ---
Re: [DISCUSS/PROPOSAL] CCC13 Hackfest: Storage Architecture Summary
Thanks John, I am still studying on it but most is adequately describing our session. On Mon, Jul 8, 2013 at 8:47 PM, John Burwell jburw...@basho.com wrote: 5. Backup/Storage Snapshots: Support transfer of storage snapshots from device to device (e.g. from a SAN to an object store). Dependent on the flexibility of the streamlined storage driver enhancements, this capability may be able to implemented completely in the orchestration layer. If the Storage/Hypervisor Decoupling work does not split the notions of storage and hypervisor snapshots, this enhancement would likely require it. I do not understand the last half sentence you write here. Does this enhancement need the decoupling or an unsplit notion of storage and hypervisor snapshots? I would think both but the start of the sentence with 'if' confuses me. Does, 'We must make sure that the Storage/Hypervisor Decoupling work does not split the notions of storage and hypervisor snapshots, as this enhancement would likely require it.', describe what you mean? regards, Daan
Re: cloudstack 4.1 QinQ vlan behaviour
So, nobody uses q in q and cloudstack 4.1 ? On Mon, Jul 8, 2013 at 3:13 PM, Valery Ciareszka valery.teres...@gmail.comwrote: Hi all, I use the following environment: CS 4.1, KVM, Centos 6.4 (management+node1+node2), OpenIndiana NFS server as primary and secondary storage I have advanced networking in zone. I split management/public/guest traffic into different vlans, and use kvm network labels (bridge names): # cat /etc/cloud/agent/agent.properties |grep device guest.network.device=cloudbrguest private.network.device=cloudbrmanage public.network.device=cloudbrpublic I have following network configuration: eth0+eth1=bond0 eth2+eth3=bond1 I use vlan with id=211 on bond1 interface for guest traffic: cloudbrguest8000.90e2ba317614 yes vlan211 cloudbrmanage 8000.90e2ba317614 yes bond1.210 cloudbrpublic 8000.90e2ba317614 yes bond1.221 cloudbrstor 8000.0025908814a4 yes bond0 The problem appeared after I have upgraded CS from 4.0.2 to 4.1. How it works in 4.0.2: -bridge interface cloudVirBr#VLANID is created on hypervisor, #VLANID - value from 1024 to 4096(is specified when creating zone), i.e. cloudVirBr1224 -vlan interface vlan211.#VLANID is created on hypervisor and is plugged into cloudVirBr#VLANID I should had permitted 211 vlanid on switchports and all guest traffic (vlans 1024-4096) was encapsulated. How it works in 4.1: -bridge interface br#ETHNAME-#VLANID is created on hypervisor, where #VLANID - value from 1024 to 4096(is specified when creating zone) and #ETHNAME - name of device on top of which vlan will be created i.e. brbond1-1224 -vlan interface bond1.#VLANID is created on hypervisor and is plugged into br#ETHNAME-#VLANID However, vlan interface is created on top of bond1 interface, while I would like it to be created on top of vlan211 (bond1.211) Now I should permit 1024-4096 vlanid on switchports, that is not convenient. How do I configure CS 4.1 so that it could work with guest vlans the same way as it had worked in CS 4.0 ? -- Regards, Valery http://protocol.by/slayer -- Regards, Valery http://protocol.by/slayer
RE: CloudStack Network architecture for VPC...
Hello No body deployed VPC feature on a large scale deployment ? L De : COCHE Sébastien [mailto:sco...@sigma.fr] Envoyé : lundi 8 juillet 2013 11:49 À : users@cloudstack.apache.org Objet : RE: CloudStack Network architecture for VPC... It seems the VPC feature work fine in a small-scale deployment (when cloudstack management is on the same network that hypervisors) Does anyone already used VPC on large-scale deployment ? My configuration look like this schema ( taken in Cloustack installation guide 4.0.0, chapter 9.2) -Message d'origine- De : COCHE Sébastien [mailto:sco...@sigma.fr] Envoyé : lundi 8 juillet 2013 11:24 À : users@cloudstack.apache.org Objet : CloudStack Network architecture for VPC... Hello all, I want to test VPC feature on CloudStack. When I deploy a new VPC, le communication failed between VPC's vrouter and CloudStack manager. After some investigation, it seems that the vRouter default gateway is set on public subnet, and there is no static route configured to join the Cloudstack manager on the management network. I configure a subnet for Cloud management (cloudstack manager, vCenter server, ...) and a subnet for each Pod (VMware hypervisor and KVM hypervisors). Can you tell me what is wrong in my design ? Shoud I add a Cloudstack manager NIC in each Pod or should I put hypervisors in the same subnet that the CloudStack Manager ? Standard vRouter worked fine in that design... Thank you Best regards Sébastien Coché, Architecte Infrastructure Direction Veille Méthodes (+33) 2.53.48.92.57 - poste : 92.57 (+33) 6.22.25.03.74 SIGMA Informatique - http://www.sigma.fr/ http://www.sigma.fr/ http://www.sigma.fr/ http://www.sigma.fr/ 3 rue Newton - BP 4127 44241 La Chapelle sur Erdre Cedex
How to let vm instance display the processor info of its host server?
I use kvm as hypervisor,cloudstack is intalled on a dell server.The cpu is E5-2620,the hdd is Seagate SAS. By default the vm processor info is qemu virtual processor,the harddisk info is qemu or virtio driver. I want to let the vm show the hardware info of its host server , just like E5-2620,SAS hdd. Is there any global setting or other method to achieve it ?
question about migrate VMs from xenserver 6.1 to cloudstack 3.0.2/4.1
Hi, We have a xenserver 6.1 pool with 6 hosts, there are total about 90 VMs. Some with one disk and others with 2 disk on NFS shared storage. In the meanwhile, we have a cloudstack 3.0.2 with xenserver 6.0.2 hosts.(we had plan of upgrading to cloudstack 4.1xenserver 6.1 soon) The storage is on iscsi. My question is: If I want move all the vms on xenserver pool to cloudstack, if there is a way for fast migration? Or I have to migrate one by one? For my understanding, I need export each vm in xenserver, then import it to cloudstack as template, and create instance from the imported template. But in this process, it works only for one-disk vms, how about the vms with 2 disks? Any comments or suggestions will be greatly appreciated. Thanks, William This e-mail may be privileged and/or confidential, and the sender does not waive any related rights and obligations. Any distribution, use or copying of this e-mail or the information it contains by other than an intended recipient is unauthorized. If you received this e-mail in error, please advise me (by return e-mail or otherwise) immediately. Ce courrier électronique est confidentiel et protégé. L'expéditeur ne renonce pas aux droits et obligations qui s'y rapportent. Toute diffusion, utilisation ou copie de ce message ou des renseignements qu'il contient par une personne autre que le (les) destinataire(s) désigné(s) est interdite. Si vous recevez ce courrier électronique par erreur, veuillez m'en aviser immédiatement, par retour de courrier électronique ou par un autre moyen.
RE: Advanced Physical Networking query
Unfortunately the blog article referenced has a few errors in it so could be confusing, you might want to take a look at the following http://www.shapeblue.com/citrix/cloudstack-networking-considerations/ http://www.shapeblue.com/cloudstack/understanding-cloudstacks-physical-networking-architecture/ http://blog.remibergsma.com/2012/08/30/going-beyond-cloudstack-advanced-networking-how-i-replaced-the-virtual-router-with-my-own-physical-linux-router/ Regards Geoff Higginbottom D: +44 20 3603 0542 | S: +44 20 3603 0540 | M: +447968161581 geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com -Original Message- From: Jayapal Reddy Uradi [mailto:jayapalreddy.ur...@citrix.com] Sent: 06 July 2013 16:31 To: users@cloudstack.apache.org Cc: Musayev, Ilya Subject: Re: Advanced Physical Networking query Hi, Create advanced isolated network. In advanced isolated network VMs gets internal ip address from the virtual router DHCP ip address. On network you can acquire public ip address which get configured on the VR. To the reach VMs from the public side you can configure the either port forwarding or static nat rules along with firewall rules on the public ip address. Please refer the following http://blogs.clogeny.com/citrixs-cloudstack-3-0-advanced-zone-setup/ Thanks, Jayapal On 06-Jul-2013, at 7:51 AM, Abhinandan Prateek cloudst...@aprateek.com wrote: Hi Ian, You are looking for a basic zone. Probably go thru the admin guide here http://cloudstack.apache.org/docs/en-US/Apache_CloudStack/4.0.0-incuba ting/ html-single/Admin_Guide/#basic-zone-configuration -abhi On 06/07/13 6:56 AM, Ian Duffy i...@ianduffy.ie wrote: Hi Ilya/List I was reading the post over at https://cwiki.apache.org/CLOUDSTACK/cloudstack-advanced-network-tutor ial-s tep-by-step.html and was wondering If I could get some information from you(or anybody else who can contribute). I want a setup where by instances are brought up with a Public IP and an Internal IP for communication with other instances both got from DHCP running on a physical gateway. In terms of networking with xen(preferably) or vcenter what networking is required? I'm assuming I'll need the following: Management Network Cloudstack Manager Hypervisor Storage Guest Network (Instance gets some private IP supplied by DHCP on physical gateway) Hypervisor Public Network (Instance gets some public IP supplied by DHCP on physical gateway) Hypervisor Is it just a matter of 1) Creating a network offering as described here: http://blog.remibergsma.com/2012/03/10/howto-create-a-network-in-clou dstac k-without-a-virtual-router/ 2) Creating a public and guest network within the zone 3) Creating matching labels for the public and guest networks in xen pointing to the uuid of the network cards I think what is tripping me up the most is the IP address space required for a pod. I understand a pod contains hosts and primary storage so am I correct in thinking that my pod address space in the above outlined configuration would just be some addresses within the address space given to management network? Thanks, Ian This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any views or opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Shape Blue Ltd or related companies. If you are not the intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any action based upon its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please contact the sender if you believe you have received this email in error. Shape Blue Ltd is a company incorporated in England Wales. ShapeBlue Services India LLP is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue is a registered trademark.
RE: question about migrate VMs from xenserver 6.1 to cloudstack 3.0.2/4.1
The method you describe is the only way I know how to do it. We have done a similar migration with some scripts around xe on xenserver and cloudmonkey for importing to cloudstack. I'm interested to know if anyone else has tried this. We have 1000's of vms still to migrate from legacy xenserver into cloudstack. Maybe we can publish a tool for this that the community can maintain? -Original Message- From: William Jiang [mailto:william.ji...@manwin.com] Sent: Tuesday, July 09, 2013 7:30 AM To: users@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: question about migrate VMs from xenserver 6.1 to cloudstack 3.0.2/4.1 Hi, We have a xenserver 6.1 pool with 6 hosts, there are total about 90 VMs. Some with one disk and others with 2 disk on NFS shared storage. In the meanwhile, we have a cloudstack 3.0.2 with xenserver 6.0.2 hosts.(we had plan of upgrading to cloudstack 4.1xenserver 6.1 soon) The storage is on iscsi. My question is: If I want move all the vms on xenserver pool to cloudstack, if there is a way for fast migration? Or I have to migrate one by one? For my understanding, I need export each vm in xenserver, then import it to cloudstack as template, and create instance from the imported template. But in this process, it works only for one-disk vms, how about the vms with 2 disks? Any comments or suggestions will be greatly appreciated. Thanks, William This e-mail may be privileged and/or confidential, and the sender does not waive any related rights and obligations. Any distribution, use or copying of this e-mail or the information it contains by other than an intended recipient is unauthorized. If you received this e-mail in error, please advise me (by return e-mail or otherwise) immediately. Ce courrier électronique est confidentiel et protégé. L'expéditeur ne renonce pas aux droits et obligations qui s'y rapportent. Toute diffusion, utilisation ou copie de ce message ou des renseignements qu'il contient par une personne autre que le (les) destinataire(s) désigné(s) est interdite. Si vous recevez ce courrier électronique par erreur, veuillez m'en aviser immédiatement, par retour de courrier électronique ou par un autre moyen.
Re: outage feedback and questions
Hi Dean, And thanks for your answer. Yes the network troubles lead to issue with the main storage on clusters (iscsi). So is that a fact if the main storage is lost on KVM, VMs are stopped and domain destroyed ? It was an hypothesis as I found traces in apache-cloudstack-4.0.2-src/plugins/hypervisors/kvm/src/com/cloud/hypervisor/kvm/resource/KVMHABase.java which kills -9 qemu processes if main storage is not found, but I was not sure when the function was called. It's on the function checkingMountPoint, which calls destroyVMs if mount point not found. Regards, - Mail original - De: Dean Kamali dean.kam...@gmail.com À: users@cloudstack.apache.org Envoyé: Lundi 8 Juillet 2013 16:34:04 Objet: Re: outage feedback and questions Survivors VMs are on the same KVM/GFS2 Cluster. SSVM is one of them. Messages on the console indicates she was temporarily in read-only mode Do you have an issue with storage? I wouldn't expect a failure in switch could cause all of this, it will cause loss of network connectivity but it shouldn't cause your vms to go down. This behavior usually happens when you lose your primary storage. On Mon, Jul 8, 2013 at 8:39 AM, Laurent Steff laurent.st...@inria.frwrote: Hello, Cloudstack is used in our company as a core component of a Continuous Integration Service. We are mainly happy with it, for a lot of reasons too long to describe. :) We encountered recently a major service outage on Cloudstack mainly linked to bad practices on our side, and the aim of this post is : - ask questions about things we didn't understand yet - gather some practical best practices we missed - if problems detected are still present on Cloudstack 4.x, helping to robustify Cloudstack with our feedback we know that 3.x version is not supported and plan to move ASAP in 4.x version. It's quite a long mail, and it may be badly directed (dev mailing list ? multiple bugs ?) Any response is appreciated ;) Regards, long part Architecture : -- Old and non Apache CloudStack 3.0.2 release 1 Zone, 1 physical network, 1 pod 1 Virtual Router VM, 1 SSVM 4 CentOS 6.3 KVM clusters, primary storage GFS2 on iscsi storage Management Server on Vmware virtual machine Incidents : --- Day 1 : Management Server DoSed by internal synchronization scripts (ldap to Cloudstack) Day 3 : DoS corrected, Management Server RAM and CPU ugraded, and rebooted (never rebooted in more than a year). Cloudstack is running again normally (vm creation/stop/start/console/...) Day 4 : (week-end) Network outage on core datacenter switch. Network unstable 2 days. Symptoms : -- Day 7 : The network is operationnal but most of VMs down (250 of 300) since Day 4. Libvirt configuration (/etc/libvirt.d/qemu/VMuid.xml erased). VirtualRouter VM fileystem was on of them. Filesystem corruption prevented it to reboot normally. Survivors VMs are on the same KVM/GFS2 Cluster. SSVM is one of them. Messages on the console indicates she was temporarily in read-only mode Hard way to revival (actions): - 1. VirtualRouter VM destructed by an administrator, to let CloudStack recreate it from template. BUT :) the SystemVM KVM Template is not available. Status in GUI is CONNECTION REFUSED. The url from where it was downloaded during install is no more valid (old and unavailable internal mirror server instead of http://download.cloud.com) = we are unable to start again VMs stopped and create new ones 2. Manual download on the Managment Server of the template, like in a fresh install --- /usr/lib64/cloud/agent/scripts/storage/secondary/cloud-install-sys-tmplt -m /mnt/secondary/ -u http://ourworkingmirror/repository/cloudstack-downloads/acton-systemvm-02062012.qcow2.bz2-h kvm -F --- It's no sufficient. mysql table template_host_ref does not change. Even when changing url in mysql tables. We still have CONNECTION REFUSED on template status in mysql and on the GUI 3. after analysis, we needed to alter manualy mysql tables (template_id of systemVM KVM was x) : --- update template_host_ref set download_state='DOWNLOADED' where template_id=x; update template_host_ref set job_id='NULL' where template_id=x; = may be useless update template_host_ref set job_id='NULL' where template_id=x; = may be useless --- 4. As in MySQL, status on GUI is DOWNLOADED 5. Poweron of a stopped VM, Cloudstack builds a new VirtualRouter VM and we can let users start manually their stopped VM Questions : --- 1. What did stop and destroyed the libvirt domains of our VMs ? There's some part of code who could do this, but I'm not sure 2. Is it possible
Re: outage feedback and questions
courtesy to geoff.higginbottom@shapeblue.comfor answering this question first On Tue, Jul 9, 2013 at 7:33 PM, Dean Kamali dean.kam...@gmail.com wrote: Well, I have asked in the mailing list sometime ago, about cloudstack behaviour when I lose connectively to primary storage, then hypervisor start rebooting randomly. I believe this what is very similar to what happend in your case. This is actually 'by design'. The logic is that if the storage goes offline, then all VMs must have also failed, and a 'forced' reboot of the Host 'might' automatically fix things. This is great if you only have one Primary Storage, but typically you have more than one, so whilst the reboot might fix the failed storage, it will also kill off all the perfectly good VMs which were still happily running. The answer what I got was for xenserver not KVM, it included removing the reboot -f option for a config file. The fix for XenServer Hosts is to: 1. Modify /opt/xensource/bin/xenheartbeat.sh on all your Hosts, commenting out the two entries which have reboot -f 2. Identify the PID of the script - pidof -x xenheartbeat.sh 3. Restart the Script - kill pid 4. Force reconnect Host from the UI, the script will then re-launch on reconnect On Tue, Jul 9, 2013 at 7:08 PM, Laurent Steff laurent.st...@inria.frwrote: Hi Dean, And thanks for your answer. Yes the network troubles lead to issue with the main storage on clusters (iscsi). So is that a fact if the main storage is lost on KVM, VMs are stopped and domain destroyed ? It was an hypothesis as I found traces in apache-cloudstack-4.0.2-src/plugins/hypervisors/kvm/src/com/cloud/hypervisor/kvm/resource/KVMHABase.java which kills -9 qemu processes if main storage is not found, but I was not sure when the function was called. It's on the function checkingMountPoint, which calls destroyVMs if mount point not found. Regards, - Mail original - De: Dean Kamali dean.kam...@gmail.com À: users@cloudstack.apache.org Envoyé: Lundi 8 Juillet 2013 16:34:04 Objet: Re: outage feedback and questions Survivors VMs are on the same KVM/GFS2 Cluster. SSVM is one of them. Messages on the console indicates she was temporarily in read-only mode Do you have an issue with storage? I wouldn't expect a failure in switch could cause all of this, it will cause loss of network connectivity but it shouldn't cause your vms to go down. This behavior usually happens when you lose your primary storage. On Mon, Jul 8, 2013 at 8:39 AM, Laurent Steff laurent.st...@inria.frwrote: Hello, Cloudstack is used in our company as a core component of a Continuous Integration Service. We are mainly happy with it, for a lot of reasons too long to describe. :) We encountered recently a major service outage on Cloudstack mainly linked to bad practices on our side, and the aim of this post is : - ask questions about things we didn't understand yet - gather some practical best practices we missed - if problems detected are still present on Cloudstack 4.x, helping to robustify Cloudstack with our feedback we know that 3.x version is not supported and plan to move ASAP in 4.x version. It's quite a long mail, and it may be badly directed (dev mailing list ? multiple bugs ?) Any response is appreciated ;) Regards, long part Architecture : -- Old and non Apache CloudStack 3.0.2 release 1 Zone, 1 physical network, 1 pod 1 Virtual Router VM, 1 SSVM 4 CentOS 6.3 KVM clusters, primary storage GFS2 on iscsi storage Management Server on Vmware virtual machine Incidents : --- Day 1 : Management Server DoSed by internal synchronization scripts (ldap to Cloudstack) Day 3 : DoS corrected, Management Server RAM and CPU ugraded, and rebooted (never rebooted in more than a year). Cloudstack is running again normally (vm creation/stop/start/console/...) Day 4 : (week-end) Network outage on core datacenter switch. Network unstable 2 days. Symptoms : -- Day 7 : The network is operationnal but most of VMs down (250 of 300) since Day 4. Libvirt configuration (/etc/libvirt.d/qemu/VMuid.xml erased). VirtualRouter VM fileystem was on of them. Filesystem corruption prevented it to reboot normally. Survivors VMs are on the same KVM/GFS2 Cluster. SSVM is one of them. Messages on the console indicates she was temporarily in read-only mode Hard way to revival (actions): - 1. VirtualRouter VM destructed by an administrator, to let CloudStack recreate it from template. BUT :) the SystemVM KVM Template is not available. Status in GUI is CONNECTION REFUSED. The url from
Re: CloudStack Mirrors
If there is a need, we (Contegix) are happy to host one. Cheers, Matthew --- Matthew E. Porter Contegix E-mail: matthew.por...@contegix.com Twitter: @meporter | http://twitter.com/meporter On Jul 9, 2013, at 7:24 PM, Maurice Lawler maurice.law...@me.com wrote: Greetings, Is there any plan to make use of mirrors for folks downloading / updating from the repo. Or is there one in existence now? - Maurice
System VM
Hello,I'm curious, is this the most recent up to date system VM for download for KVM?http://download.cloud.com/templates/acton/acton-systemvm-02062012.qcow2.bz2
Re: CloudStack News - Moving to Wednesday
Hi, all. According to the Apache infra status http://monitoring.apache.org/status/ , the ASF Blog system has been in the status of CRITICAL or WARNING for many days, and I'm still not able to browse the newsletter website. It's close to Wednesday now. Does anyone know what's going on there? --- Yu-Heng (Ryan) Lei, Associate Reasearcher Chunghwa Telecom Laboratories / Cloud Computing Laboratory ryan...@cht.com.twhttps://email.cht.com.tw/owa/redir.aspx?C=-wE1FEC3G0SWYpVkiWo8SsDdf3ZqO9AIuAPTzRnFYCUi-z4YljtI_hyVKkNHfn9F1Bn-vUWJnQ4.URL=mailto%3aryanlei%40cht.com.tw or ryanlei750...@gmail.com On Tue, Jul 9, 2013 at 2:49 AM, Mathias Mullins mathias.mull...@citrix.comwrote: - Multi-list send since this is a community wide announcement Just a reminder, the community news blog is moving to being published on Wednesdays starting this week on July 10! This is to make it more timely with the data that we are working on throughout the week. Please make sure to have any information, events (including dates), or topics that you would like to see covered or focused on posted to the marketing@c.a.o mailing list by Monday EOD so we have time to get it in. We'll try to get stuff happening in on Tuesday as well. If you would like to add it directly to the news feed wiki, please add it at: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/CloudStack+Weekly+News https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/CloudStack+Weekly+News# # https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/CloudStack+Weekly+News# Thanks, Matt Mullins
Re: CloudStack News - Moving to Wednesday
Yes, there are some problems with roller instance (the underlying software that blogs.a.o runs). Infrastructure has been discussing the situation. There is no immediate timeline on having the issue resolved to my knowledge. --David On Tue, Jul 9, 2013 at 10:03 PM, Ryan Lei ryan...@cht.com.tw wrote: Hi, all. According to the Apache infra status http://monitoring.apache.org/status/ , the ASF Blog system has been in the status of CRITICAL or WARNING for many days, and I'm still not able to browse the newsletter website. It's close to Wednesday now. Does anyone know what's going on there? --- Yu-Heng (Ryan) Lei, Associate Reasearcher Chunghwa Telecom Laboratories / Cloud Computing Laboratory ryan...@cht.com.twhttps://email.cht.com.tw/owa/redir.aspx?C=-wE1FEC3G0SWYpVkiWo8SsDdf3ZqO9AIuAPTzRnFYCUi-z4YljtI_hyVKkNHfn9F1Bn-vUWJnQ4.URL=mailto%3aryanlei%40cht.com.tw or ryanlei750...@gmail.com On Tue, Jul 9, 2013 at 2:49 AM, Mathias Mullins mathias.mull...@citrix.comwrote: - Multi-list send since this is a community wide announcement Just a reminder, the community news blog is moving to being published on Wednesdays starting this week on July 10! This is to make it more timely with the data that we are working on throughout the week. Please make sure to have any information, events (including dates), or topics that you would like to see covered or focused on posted to the marketing@c.a.o mailing list by Monday EOD so we have time to get it in. We'll try to get stuff happening in on Tuesday as well. If you would like to add it directly to the news feed wiki, please add it at: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/CloudStack+Weekly+News https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/CloudStack+Weekly+News# # https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/CloudStack+Weekly+News# Thanks, Matt Mullins
Re: CloudStack News - Moving to Wednesday
We'll try to get it up as soon as the issues clear up. Matt On 7/9/13 9:06 PM, David Nalley da...@gnsa.us wrote: Yes, there are some problems with roller instance (the underlying software that blogs.a.o runs). Infrastructure has been discussing the situation. There is no immediate timeline on having the issue resolved to my knowledge. --David On Tue, Jul 9, 2013 at 10:03 PM, Ryan Lei ryan...@cht.com.tw wrote: Hi, all. According to the Apache infra status http://monitoring.apache.org/status/ , the ASF Blog system has been in the status of CRITICAL or WARNING for many days, and I'm still not able to browse the newsletter website. It's close to Wednesday now. Does anyone know what's going on there? - -- Yu-Heng (Ryan) Lei, Associate Reasearcher Chunghwa Telecom Laboratories / Cloud Computing Laboratory ryan...@cht.com.twhttps://email.cht.com.tw/owa/redir.aspx?C=-wE1FEC3G0SW YpVkiWo8SsDdf3ZqO9AIuAPTzRnFYCUi-z4YljtI_hyVKkNHfn9F1Bn-vUWJnQ4.URL=mail to%3aryanlei%40cht.com.tw or ryanlei750...@gmail.com On Tue, Jul 9, 2013 at 2:49 AM, Mathias Mullins mathias.mull...@citrix.comwrote: - Multi-list send since this is a community wide announcement Just a reminder, the community news blog is moving to being published on Wednesdays starting this week on July 10! This is to make it more timely with the data that we are working on throughout the week. Please make sure to have any information, events (including dates), or topics that you would like to see covered or focused on posted to the marketing@c.a.o mailing list by Monday EOD so we have time to get it in. We'll try to get stuff happening in on Tuesday as well. If you would like to add it directly to the news feed wiki, please add it at: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/CloudStack+Weekly +News https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/CloudStack+Weekly +News# # https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/CloudStack+Weekly +News# Thanks, Matt Mullins
