Re: help,高级部署，创建VM失败：Cleaning up because we're unable to implement the network Ntwk[207|Guest|8]
thanks,你说得没错，在网上也找到同样的问题，是因为没有设置guest vlan 我的交换机不具备vlan功能，所以在创建zone时，忽略了填一个guest vlan的范围。 问题解决了 thanks On Thu, Aug 1, 2013 at 3:13 PM, tanthalas tanthalas...@hotmail.com wrote: 从log来看，是建guest network报错，有可能是vlan id重复了。 再把建zone时的配置，填写的内容说清楚一点，来判断原因。 2013-08-01 刘宇超 Richard Liu 发件人： sunko2014 发送时间： 2013-08-01 15:02:39 收件人： users-cn 抄送： 主题： help,高级部署，创建VM失败：Cleaning up because we're unable to implement the network Ntwk[207|Guest|8] hello: 了解CloudStack的网络方案后，尝试高级部署CloudStack，我的部署方案是: 1、管理和存储走一个交换机网络（172.16.100.x），Public和Guest走一个交换机网络，Pulic是公司内网（192.168.45.x），guest是自定义网络(10.1.1.x) 2、1台主机跑Manage Server，网卡接管理存储网络，1台主机跑XENServer，2张网卡，1张接管理存储网络，1张接PublicGuest网络，1台主机跑NFS（提供Secondary Storage），接网络存储网络 添加zone后，host、主存储、辅存储，SSVM和CPVM都正常启动，但是router vm没有启动。 通过ISO创建VM时，提示创建失败，查了下log，应该是网络出了问题，log如下，请各位提供点意见，谢谢。 ... ... 2013-08-01 14:29:59,780 DEBUG [cloud.vm.VirtualMachineManagerImpl] (Job-Executor-2:job-36) VM is being created in podId: 1 2013-08-01 14:29:59,792 DEBUG [cloud.network.NetworkManagerImpl] (Job-Executor-2:job-36) Lock is acquired for network id 207 as a part of network implement 2013-08-01 14:29:59,792 DEBUG [cloud.network.NetworkManagerImpl] (Job-Executor-2:job-36) Asking ExternalGuestNetworkGuru to implement Ntwk[207|Guest|8] 2013-08-01 14:29:59,915 DEBUG [db.Transaction.Transaction] (Job-Executor-2:job-36) Rolling back the transaction: Time = 3 Name = -AsyncJobManagerImpl$1.run:398-Exec utors$RunnableAdapter.call:471-FutureTask$Sync.innerRun:334-FutureTask.run:166-ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker:1146-ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run:615-Thread.run:679; ca lled by -Transaction.rollback:887-Transaction.removeUpTo:830-Transaction.close:649-DatabaseCallback.interceptComplete:71-DatabaseCallback.intercept:36-DataCenterDaoI mpl.allocateVnet:190-DatabaseCallback.intercept:34-GuestNetworkGuru.allocateVnet:310-GuestNetworkGuru.implement:337-ExternalGuestNetworkGuru.implement:126-NetworkMan agerImpl.implementNetwork:1956-DatabaseCallback.intercept:34 2013-08-01 14:29:59,929 DEBUG [cloud.network.NetworkManagerImpl] (Job-Executor-2:job-36) Cleaning up because we're unable to implement the network Ntwk[207|Guest|8] 2013-08-01 14:30:00,055 DEBUG [cloud.network.NetworkManagerImpl] (Job-Executor-2:job-36) Releasing 0 port forwarding rules for network id=207 as a part of shutdownNe tworkRules 2013-08-01 14:30:00,055 DEBUG [cloud.network.NetworkManagerImpl] (Job-Executor-2:job-36) There are no rules to forward to the network elements 2013-08-01 14:30:00,068 DEBUG [cloud.network.NetworkManagerImpl] (Job-Executor-2:job-36) Releasing 0 static nat rules for network id=207 as a part of shutdownNetwork Rules 2013-08-01 14:30:00,068 DEBUG [cloud.network.NetworkManagerImpl] (Job-Executor-2:job-36) There are no rules to forward to the network elements 2013-08-01 14:30:00,093 DEBUG [cloud.network.NetworkManagerImpl] (Job-Executor-2:job-36) There are no rules to forward to the network elements 2013-08-01 14:30:00,096 DEBUG [cloud.network.NetworkManagerImpl] (Job-Executor-2:job-36) Releasing 0 firewall rules for network id=207 as a part of shutdownNetworkRu les 2013-08-01 14:30:00,096 DEBUG [cloud.network.NetworkManagerImpl] (Job-Executor-2:job-36) There are no rules to forward to the network elements 2013-08-01 14:30:00,099 DEBUG [cloud.network.NetworkManagerImpl] (Job-Executor-2:job-36) Releasing 0 Network ACLs for network id=207 as a part of shutdownNetworkRule s 2013-08-01 14:30:00,099 DEBUG [cloud.network.NetworkManagerImpl] (Job-Executor-2:job-36) There are no rules to forward to the network elements 2013-08-01 14:30:00,102 DEBUG [network.rules.RulesManagerImpl] (Job-Executor-2:job-36) Found 0 static nat rules to apply for network id 207 2013-08-01 14:30:00,126 DEBUG [cloud.network.NetworkManagerImpl] (Job-Executor-2:job-36) Sending network shutdown to VirtualRouter 2013-08-01 14:30:00,130 DEBUG [cloud.network.NetworkManagerImpl] (Job-Executor-2:job-36) Network id=207 is shutdown successfully, cleaning up corresponding resources now. 2013-08-01 14:30:00,135 DEBUG [network.guru.GuestNetworkGuru] (Job-Executor-2:job-36) Releasing vnet for the network id=207 2013-08-01 14:30:00,218 DEBUG [cloud.network.NetworkManagerImpl] (Job-Executor-2:job-36) Lock is released for network id 207 as a part of network implement 2013-08-01 14:30:00,219 INFO [cloud.vm.VirtualMachineManagerImpl] (Job-Executor-2:job-36) Insufficient capacity com.cloud.exception.InsufficientVirtualNetworkCapcityException: Unable to allocate vnet as a part of network Ntwk[207|Guest|8] implement Scope=interface com.cloud.dc .DataCenter; id=1 at com.cloud.network.guru.GuestNetworkGuru.allocateVnet(GuestNetworkGuru.java:312) at com.cloud.network.guru.GuestNetworkGuru.implement(GuestNetworkGuru.java:337) at com.cloud.network.guru.ExternalGuestNetworkGuru.implement(ExternalGuestNetworkGuru.java:126)
在cloudstack4.0.2中改变已经创建好的虚拟机的计算方案，虚拟机正常启动
各位大侠们， 我在测试cloudstack4.0.2过程中，首先给win2008虚拟机分配好计算方案(比如：2核CPU、2G内存)，创建虚拟机成功后，我想改变虚拟机的CPU核和内存大小(比如：改成4核CPU4G内存)，把虚拟机stop，更改为新的计算方案，重新启动虚拟机，虚拟机就无法正常启动，一直卡在开机滚动条位置。请教大侠们，是否遇到如此问题，该如何解决？ zt
Re: 在cloudstack4.0.2中改变已经创建好的虚拟机的计算方案，虚拟机正常启动
win2008是32位还是64位的？ 在 2013年8月1日上午11:38，zt zhaotao...@qq.com写道： 各位大侠们， 我在测试cloudstack4.0.2过程中，首先给win2008虚拟机分配好计算方案(比如：2核CPU、2G内存)，创建虚拟机成功后，我想改变虚拟机的CPU核和内存大小(比如：改成4核CPU4G内存)，把虚拟机stop，更改为新的计算方案，重新启动虚拟机，虚拟机就无法正常启动，一直卡在开机滚动条位置。请教大侠们，是否遇到如此问题，该如何解决？ zt
回复：Re: Re: 在cloudstack4.0.2中改变已经创建好的虚拟机的计算方案，虚拟机正常启动
这个其实有可能是操作系统本身的问题，之前我遇到过是这种场景：虚拟机制作镜像时，使用的是cpu双核，后来创建虚拟机使用该镜像模板虚拟机的cpu单核，这种情况windows系列都会存在问题， 建议你使用window xp或者window其它系统试一下行不行，如果行，应该就可以确定是win2008系统不支持这种模式，我之前试过winxp是没问题的。 - 原始邮件 - 发件人：陈珂 che...@ourfuture.cn 收件人：users-cn users-cn@cloudstack.apache.org 主题：Re: Re: 在cloudstack4.0.2中改变已经创建好的虚拟机的计算方案，虚拟机正常启动 日期：2013年08月02日 09点18分
help:通过控制台访问VM失败
各位：
问题如题，部署环境cloudStack4.02,+xenserver6.0，通过iso方式创建VM后，在chorme、IE6上通过控制台访问VM均失败，下面是management
server的log：
... ...
2013-08-02 11:11:50,167 DEBUG [agent.transport.Request]
(DirectAgent-393:null) Seq 1-659951545: Processing: { Ans: , MgmtId:
260071274268429, via: 1, Ver: v1, Flags: 10,
[{GetVncPortAnswer:{address:consoleurl=
https://172.16.101.100/console?uuid=2242d3f7-ad5c-134a-652a-b1644f00313dsessionref=OpaqueRef:f4f1a6a4-5fc7-eab4-96fc-b4043c3e5cf5,port:5905,result:true,wait:0}}]
}
2013-08-02 11:11:50,167 DEBUG [agent.transport.Request]
(catalina-exec-17:null) Seq 1-659951545: Received: { Ans: , MgmtId:
260071274268429, via: 1, Ver: v1, Flags: 10, { GetVncPortAnswer } }
2013-08-02 11:11:50,167 DEBUG [cloud.servlet.ConsoleProxyServlet]
(catalina-exec-17:null) Port info consoleurl=
https://172.16.101.100/console?uuid=2242d3f7-ad5c-134a-652a-b1644f00313dsessionref=OpaqueRef:f4f1a6a4-5fc7-eab4-96fc-b4043c3e5cf5
2013-08-02 11:11:50,167 INFO [cloud.servlet.ConsoleProxyServlet]
(catalina-exec-17:null) Parse host info returned from executing
GetVNCPortCommand. host info: consoleurl=
https://172.16.101.100/console?uuid=2242d3f7-ad5c-134a-652a-b1644f00313dsessionref=OpaqueRef:f4f1a6a4-5fc7-eab4-96fc-b4043c3e5cf5
2013-08-02 11:11:50,174 DEBUG [cloud.servlet.ConsoleProxyServlet]
(catalina-exec-17:null) Compose console url:
https://192-168-45-151.realhostip.com/ajax?token=tsl1xX_XA22fT8WGySZVyWSrZhWM13kgOMdgCRJQJjorDfux2-SSoUWFOJgHQpgBp0ZptEq2Xg3GwFqUGR4BZoTni6p6PhTry5lATbs34ZurK5VBp3S8BnR95AlDgb-xpUbimHYL3cGR7QaZCLPrx2AJOktrEFEoh-FSDyXbiMuyrL2ums3LISK79NVMr6W8flw0odbLopKv9a3BaRzyC-GKmgVzGDqONhUDalbteoiZv9c0LCnWXnTixdj6vzt0rLpY4xgF_9KCxIj191SC1XpFO6lZRBt-hJDa8N73KIkUCnKwwB8tZC34veUjOyBCFuYg5rEIysaJP47D3yQXl3HeBP6YjbMHvZNwwXwa1QbFoKe926CrppkTdIR5B6XIXAm_J3Fv32rAUnqYegKTN2ZV7aF9el2P5bHB_Kw0au6xq-FJtmZwAhskQICDQ5dLnbsUd4048TKw-eIC80sZ5xpyklT1bBSZH45PyacmUag
2013-08-02 11:11:50,175 DEBUG [cloud.servlet.ConsoleProxyServlet]
(catalina-exec-17:null) the console url is ::
htmltitletest07/titleframesetframe src=
https://192-168-45-151.realhostip.com/ajax?token=tsl1xX_XA22fT8WGySZVyWSrZhWM13kgOMdgCRJQJjorDfux2-SSoUWFOJgHQpgBp0ZptEq2Xg3GwFqUGR4BZoTni6p6PhTry5lATbs34ZurK5VBp3S8BnR95AlDgb-xpUbimHYL3cGR7QaZCLPrx2AJOktrEFEoh-FSDyXbiMuyrL2ums3LISK79NVMr6W8flw0odbLopKv9a3BaRzyC-GKmgVzGDqONhUDalbteoiZv9c0LCnWXnTixdj6vzt0rLpY4xgF_9KCxIj191SC1XpFO6lZRBt-hJDa8N73KIkUCnKwwB8tZC34veUjOyBCFuYg5rEIysaJP47D3yQXl3HeBP6YjbMHvZNwwXwa1QbFoKe926CrppkTdIR5B6XIXAm_J3Fv32rAUnqYegKTN2ZV7aF9el2P5bHB_Kw0au6xq-FJtmZwAhskQICDQ5dLnbsUd4048TKw-eIC80sZ5xpyklT1bBSZH45PyacmUag
/frame/frameset/html
2013-08-02 11:11:53,595 DEBUG [agent.manager.DirectAgentAttache]
(DirectAgent-66:null) Ping from 1
... ...
我是部署的高级网络模式，proxy console system vm有三个网卡，net1:192.168.45.151（public
ip，公司内网，类似公网IP），net2:172.16.101.2（自建的管理网络），net3：169.254.2.100（local）。
从v-2-VM通过管理网络可以访问到xenserver。
对于console的访问流程我不懂，如果需要提供什么log，或者跟踪信息，请指教下。
Re: help:通过控制台访问VM失败
在host上运行ssh -p 3922 -i /root/.ssh/id_rsa.cloud 169.254.2.100进console proxy
看看/var/log/systemvm/下的日志
2013/8/2 sunko2014 sunko2...@gmail.com
各位：
问题如题，部署环境cloudStack4.02,+xenserver6.0，通过iso方式创建VM后，在chorme、IE6上通过控制台访问VM均失败，下面是management
server的log：
... ...
2013-08-02 11:11:50,167 DEBUG [agent.transport.Request]
(DirectAgent-393:null) Seq 1-659951545: Processing: { Ans: , MgmtId:
260071274268429, via: 1, Ver: v1, Flags: 10,
[{GetVncPortAnswer:{address:consoleurl=
https://172.16.101.100/console?uuid=2242d3f7-ad5c-134a-652a-b1644f00313dsessionref=OpaqueRef:f4f1a6a4-5fc7-eab4-96fc-b4043c3e5cf5
,port:5905,result:true,wait:0}}]
}
2013-08-02 11:11:50,167 DEBUG [agent.transport.Request]
(catalina-exec-17:null) Seq 1-659951545: Received: { Ans: , MgmtId:
260071274268429, via: 1, Ver: v1, Flags: 10, { GetVncPortAnswer } }
2013-08-02 11:11:50,167 DEBUG [cloud.servlet.ConsoleProxyServlet]
(catalina-exec-17:null) Port info consoleurl=
https://172.16.101.100/console?uuid=2242d3f7-ad5c-134a-652a-b1644f00313dsessionref=OpaqueRef:f4f1a6a4-5fc7-eab4-96fc-b4043c3e5cf5
2013-08-02https://172.16.101.100/console?uuid=2242d3f7-ad5c-134a-652a-b1644f00313dsessionref=OpaqueRef:f4f1a6a4-5fc7-eab4-96fc-b4043c3e5cf52013-08-0211:11:50,167
INFO [cloud.servlet.ConsoleProxyServlet]
(catalina-exec-17:null) Parse host info returned from executing
GetVNCPortCommand. host info: consoleurl=
https://172.16.101.100/console?uuid=2242d3f7-ad5c-134a-652a-b1644f00313dsessionref=OpaqueRef:f4f1a6a4-5fc7-eab4-96fc-b4043c3e5cf5
2013-08-02https://172.16.101.100/console?uuid=2242d3f7-ad5c-134a-652a-b1644f00313dsessionref=OpaqueRef:f4f1a6a4-5fc7-eab4-96fc-b4043c3e5cf52013-08-0211:11:50,174
DEBUG [cloud.servlet.ConsoleProxyServlet]
(catalina-exec-17:null) Compose console url:
https://192-168-45-151.realhostip.com/ajax?token=tsl1xX_XA22fT8WGySZVyWSrZhWM13kgOMdgCRJQJjorDfux2-SSoUWFOJgHQpgBp0ZptEq2Xg3GwFqUGR4BZoTni6p6PhTry5lATbs34ZurK5VBp3S8BnR95AlDgb-xpUbimHYL3cGR7QaZCLPrx2AJOktrEFEoh-FSDyXbiMuyrL2ums3LISK79NVMr6W8flw0odbLopKv9a3BaRzyC-GKmgVzGDqONhUDalbteoiZv9c0LCnWXnTixdj6vzt0rLpY4xgF_9KCxIj191SC1XpFO6lZRBt-hJDa8N73KIkUCnKwwB8tZC34veUjOyBCFuYg5rEIysaJP47D3yQXl3HeBP6YjbMHvZNwwXwa1QbFoKe926CrppkTdIR5B6XIXAm_J3Fv32rAUnqYegKTN2ZV7aF9el2P5bHB_Kw0au6xq-FJtmZwAhskQICDQ5dLnbsUd4048TKw-eIC80sZ5xpyklT1bBSZH45PyacmUag
2013-08-02https://192-168-45-151.realhostip.com/ajax?token=tsl1xX_XA22fT8WGySZVyWSrZhWM13kgOMdgCRJQJjorDfux2-SSoUWFOJgHQpgBp0ZptEq2Xg3GwFqUGR4BZoTni6p6PhTry5lATbs34ZurK5VBp3S8BnR95AlDgb-xpUbimHYL3cGR7QaZCLPrx2AJOktrEFEoh-FSDyXbiMuyrL2ums3LISK79NVMr6W8flw0odbLopKv9a3BaRzyC-GKmgVzGDqONhUDalbteoiZv9c0LCnWXnTixdj6vzt0rLpY4xgF_9KCxIj191SC1XpFO6lZRBt-hJDa8N73KIkUCnKwwB8tZC34veUjOyBCFuYg5rEIysaJP47D3yQXl3HeBP6YjbMHvZNwwXwa1QbFoKe926CrppkTdIR5B6XIXAm_J3Fv32rAUnqYegKTN2ZV7aF9el2P5bHB_Kw0au6xq-FJtmZwAhskQICDQ5dLnbsUd4048TKw-eIC80sZ5xpyklT1bBSZH45PyacmUag2013-08-0211:11:50,175
DEBUG [cloud.servlet.ConsoleProxyServlet]
(catalina-exec-17:null) the console url is ::
htmltitletest07/titleframesetframe src=
https://192-168-45-151.realhostip.com/ajax?token=tsl1xX_XA22fT8WGySZVyWSrZhWM13kgOMdgCRJQJjorDfux2-SSoUWFOJgHQpgBp0ZptEq2Xg3GwFqUGR4BZoTni6p6PhTry5lATbs34ZurK5VBp3S8BnR95AlDgb-xpUbimHYL3cGR7QaZCLPrx2AJOktrEFEoh-FSDyXbiMuyrL2ums3LISK79NVMr6W8flw0odbLopKv9a3BaRzyC-GKmgVzGDqONhUDalbteoiZv9c0LCnWXnTixdj6vzt0rLpY4xgF_9KCxIj191SC1XpFO6lZRBt-hJDa8N73KIkUCnKwwB8tZC34veUjOyBCFuYg5rEIysaJP47D3yQXl3HeBP6YjbMHvZNwwXwa1QbFoKe926CrppkTdIR5B6XIXAm_J3Fv32rAUnqYegKTN2ZV7aF9el2P5bHB_Kw0au6xq-FJtmZwAhskQICDQ5dLnbsUd4048TKw-eIC80sZ5xpyklT1bBSZH45PyacmUag
/frame/frameset/html
2013-08-02 11:11:53,595 DEBUG [agent.manager.DirectAgentAttache]
(DirectAgent-66:null) Ping from 1
... ...
我是部署的高级网络模式，proxy console system vm有三个网卡，net1:192.168.45.151（public
ip，公司内网，类似公网IP），net2:172.16.101.2（自建的管理网络），net3：169.254.2.100（local）。
从v-2-VM通过管理网络可以访问到xenserver。
对于console的访问流程我不懂，如果需要提供什么log，或者跟踪信息，请指教下。
ISO images
Hi All, I have a ISO image in the Secondary storage, I registered the ISO image but it's not Ready. Can I download the image directly from the internet while registering the template or its only local repo? SSVM and CPVM are in stopped state I tried to start but it is not starting. Please share information on how to start the system VM's and to register the ISO image. Thanks in Advance. Chitra.M CAUTION - Disclaimer * This e-mail contains PRIVILEGED AND CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION intended solely for the use of the addressee(s). If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender by e-mail and delete the original message. Further, you are not to copy, disclose, or distribute this e-mail or its contents to any other person and any such actions are unlawful. This e-mail may contain viruses. Infosys has taken every reasonable precaution to minimize this risk, but is not liable for any damage you may sustain as a result of any virus in this e-mail. You should carry out your own virus checks before opening the e-mail or attachment. Infosys reserves the right to monitor and review the content of all messages sent to or from this e-mail address. Messages sent to or from this e-mail address may be stored on the Infosys e-mail system. ***INFOSYS End of Disclaimer INFOSYS***
Re: Template - Root disk size changes
Thank you for your quick reply. This means that I will able to extend the additional disks created by the users, is this right? Is this correct even if I will use vSphere 5.x as hypervisor platform? Thank you for your attention. Gaspare On 01/08/2013 09:02, Venkata SwamyBabu Budumuru wrote: AFAIK, you need to create another template with different size if you need. In 4.2, some enhancements happened for DATADISK but not for ROOT disk. Here is the link for DATADISK resize feature : https://cwiki.apache.org/CLOUDSTACK/resize-data-volumes.html Thanks, SWAMY On 01/08/13 11:48 AM, "Gaspare A Silvestri" g.silves...@netsons.com wrote: Hello everybody, is it possibleincreasing the root disk size on a predefined template? What I'm trying to sayisthat if I'll deploy a template with a thin disk starting from 10GB, for example, and I will decide to create an instance with 50GB HDD, is this extension automatically performed by CloudStack?Or have I got to create many different templates with different root disk sizes? Thanks in advance, Gaspare -- Supernova s.r.l. Via G. Misiticoni, 3 65126 - Pescara ITALY www.netsons.com Gaspare A. Silvestri Technical Director - Head of IT VMWare VCP 4 - VMWare VCP 5 - Microsoft MCTS Oracle OCA 11g - Oracle SUN OCP - Symantec SCS t. (+39) 085 45 100 52 m. (+39) 334 13 682 11 e. g.silves...@netsons.com Netsons un marchio registrato dalla Supernova s.r.l. Le informazioni trasmesse sono riservate alla persona o alla societ indicata come destinatario, e possono includere contenuti considerati confidenziali. Ogni elaborazione, comunicazione, trasmissione o altro utilizzo, anche azioni conseguenti alla conoscenza di queste informazioni da parte di chiunque non sia espressamente indicato come destinatario proibita. Nel caso abbiate ricevuto per errore questa comunicazione, siete pregati di darne avviso a info [at] netsons.com ed eliminare ogni stampa ed ogni traccia informatica. Il ricevente dovr inoltre accertarsi che gli eventuali allegati non contengano virus prima di aprirli. Qualunque opinione o affermazione presentata in questo messaggio da ritenersi propria dell'autore e non rappresenta necessariamente la posizione della Societ. The information transmitted is intended only for the person or entity to which it is addressed and may contain confidential material. Any review, retransmission, dissemination or other use of, or taking of any action in reliance upon this information by persons or entities other than the intended recipient is prohibited. If you received this in error, please contact: info [at] netsons.com and delete the material from any computer. If this email contains attachments you should ensure they are checked for viruses before opening them. Any views or opinions presented are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of the company.
[Doc] Dedicated Resources: Public IPs and VLANs per Account is Ready
Hi, Dedicated Resources: Public IPs and VLANs per Account is Ready documentation is ready for review. The doc is attached at https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-817 Please see section 15.8. Reserving Public IP Addresses and VLANs Per Account (132), and provide your feedback. Regards -Radhika
[Doc] Adding Multiple IP Ranges is Ready
Hi, Adding Multiple IP Ranges documentation is ready for review. The doc is attached at https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-847 Please see 15.13. Adding Multiple IP Ranges (139), and provide your feedback. Regards -Radhika
[Doc] IP Address Reservation is Ready for Review
Hi, Adding Multiple IP Ranges documentation is ready for review. The doc is attached at https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-850. Please see 15.7. IP Reservation in Isolated Guest Networks, and provide your feedback. Regards -Radhika
Unable to start System VM
Hi All, I attached the management server log file. log saying Zone is not Ready, templates are not ready. But I added the Zone and is enabled. Where we need to download the System VM template? Please anyone solve this problem. Very Urgent Thanks Chitra.M CAUTION - Disclaimer * This e-mail contains PRIVILEGED AND CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION intended solely for the use of the addressee(s). If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender by e-mail and delete the original message. Further, you are not to copy, disclose, or distribute this e-mail or its contents to any other person and any such actions are unlawful. This e-mail may contain viruses. Infosys has taken every reasonable precaution to minimize this risk, but is not liable for any damage you may sustain as a result of any virus in this e-mail. You should carry out your own virus checks before opening the e-mail or attachment. Infosys reserves the right to monitor and review the content of all messages sent to or from this e-mail address. Messages sent to or from this e-mail address may be stored on the Infosys e-mail system. ***INFOSYS End of Disclaimer INFOSYS***
RE: vms hang in expunged state
Valery, Do you still have assigned ip addresses to the vms? Regards, -Original Message- From: Valery Ciareszka [mailto:valery.teres...@gmail.com] Sent: donderdag 25 juli 2013 14:54 To: users Subject: vms hang in expunged state Hi all. I have faced the following problem: virtual machines remain in expunging state forever, and I see java.lang.NullPointerException in management server logs. I use CS 4.1, CentOS 6.4, KVM. What is the proper way to handle this issue ? Management server log: 2013-07-25 12:30:17,674 INFO [cloud.vm.UserVmManagerImpl] (UserVm-Scavenger-1:null) Found 2 vms to expunge. 2013-07-25 12:30:17,674 DEBUG [cloud.vm.VirtualMachineManagerImpl] (UserVm-Scavenger-1:null) Stopped called on VM[User|te st090703-1] but the state is Expunging 2013-07-25 12:30:17,694 DEBUG [cloud.capacity.CapacityManagerImpl] (UserVm-Scavenger-1:null) VM state transitted from :Ex punging to Expunging with event: ExpungeOperationvm's original host id: 19 new host id: null host id before state transit ion: null 2013-07-25 12:30:17,694 DEBUG [cloud.vm.VirtualMachineManagerImpl] (UserVm-Scavenger-1:null) Destroying vm VM[User|test09 0703-1] 2013-07-25 12:30:17,694 DEBUG [cloud.vm.VirtualMachineManagerImpl] (UserVm-Scavenger-1:null) Cleaning up NICS 2013-07-25 12:30:17,694 DEBUG [cloud.network.NetworkManagerImpl] (UserVm-Scavenger-1:null) Cleaning network for vm: 6164 2013-07-25 12:30:17,696 DEBUG [cloud.storage.StorageManagerImpl] (UserVm-Scavenger-1:null) Cleaning storage for vm: 6164 2013-07-25 12:30:17,697 DEBUG [cloud.vm.VirtualMachineManagerImpl] (UserVm-Scavenger-1:null) Expunged VM[User|test090703- 1] 2013-07-25 12:30:17,697 DEBUG [cloud.vm.UserVmManagerImpl] (UserVm-Scavenger-1:null) Starting cleaning up vm VM[User|test 090703-1] resources... 2013-07-25 12:30:17,705 DEBUG [network.firewall.FirewallManagerImpl] (UserVm-Scavenger-1:null) No firewall rules are foun d for vm id=6164 2013-07-25 12:30:17,706 DEBUG [cloud.vm.UserVmManagerImpl] (UserVm-Scavenger-1:null) Firewall rules are removed successfu lly as a part of vm id=6164 expunge 2013-07-25 12:30:17,709 DEBUG [network.rules.RulesManagerImpl] (UserVm-Scavenger-1:null) No port forwarding rules are fou nd for vm id=6164 2013-07-25 12:30:17,709 DEBUG [cloud.vm.UserVmManagerImpl] (UserVm-Scavenger-1:null) Port forwarding rules are removed su ccessfully as a part of vm id=6164 expunge 2013-07-25 12:30:17,711 DEBUG [cloud.vm.UserVmManagerImpl] (UserVm-Scavenger-1:null) Removed vm id=6164 from all load bal ancers as a part of expunge process 2013-07-25 12:30:17,714 DEBUG [network.rules.RulesManagerImpl] (UserVm-Scavenger-1:null) Revoking all Firewallrules as a part of disabling static nat for public IP id=1305 2013-07-25 12:30:17,716 DEBUG [network.firewall.FirewallManagerImpl] (UserVm-Scavenger-1:null) Releasing 3 firewall rules for ip id=1305 2013-07-25 12:30:17,718 WARN [cloud.vm.UserVmManagerImpl] (UserVm-Scavenger-1:null) Unable to expunge VM[User|test090703-1] java.lang.NullPointerException at com.cloud.event.EventUtils.getDomainId(EventUtils.java:116) at com.cloud.event.EventUtils.saveStartedEvent(EventUtils.java:79) at com.cloud.event.ActionEventInterceptor.interceptStart(ActionEventInterceptor.java:47) at com.cloud.utils.component.ComponentInstantiationPostProcessor$InterceptorDispatcher.intercept(ComponentInstantiationPostProcessor.java:119) at com.cloud.network.firewall.FirewallManagerImpl.revokeFirewallRulesForIp(FirewallManagerImpl.java:734) at com.cloud.network.rules.RulesManagerImpl.disableStaticNat(RulesManagerImpl.java:1194) at com.cloud.vm.UserVmManagerImpl.cleanupVmResources(UserVmManagerImpl.java:1856) at com.cloud.vm.UserVmManagerImpl.expunge(UserVmManagerImpl.java:1787) at com.cloud.vm.UserVmManagerImpl$ExpungeTask.run(UserVmManagerImpl.java:2416) at java.util.concurrent.Executors$RunnableAdapter.call(Executors.java:471) at java.util.concurrent.FutureTask$Sync.innerRunAndReset(FutureTask.java:351) at java.util.concurrent.FutureTask.runAndReset(FutureTask.java:178) at java.util.concurrent.ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor$ScheduledFutureTask.access$201(ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor.java:165) at java.util.concurrent.ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor$ScheduledFutureTask.run(ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor.java:267) at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1146) at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:615) at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:679) -- Regards, Valery http://protocol.by/slayer
RE: AWS API setup
Same bug here with CloudStack 4.1.0 RPM. I had to manually copy xes.keystore for the registration to work but now I am getting the same error as you: The service cannot be found for the endpoint reference (EPR) http://localhost:7080/awsapi/services/AmazonEC2/ I posted the question on Tuesday, but still no answer. -Original Message- From: create...@gmail.com [mailto:create...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Carlos Reategui Sent: Wednesday, July 31, 2013 19:14 To: users@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: AWS API setup No luck with the EC2 api. I am seeing this in catalina log: Jul 31, 2013 3:54:41 PM org.apache.axis2.engine.AxisEngine receive SEVERE: The service cannot be found for the endpoint reference (EPR) http://localhost:7080/awsapi/services/AmazonEC2/ org.apache.axis2.AxisFault: The service cannot be found for the endpoint reference (EPR) http://localhost:7080/awsapi/services/AmazonEC2/ at org.apache.axis2.engine.DispatchPhase.checkPostConditions(DispatchPhase.java:65) at org.apache.axis2.engine.Phase.invoke(Phase.java:334) at org.apache.axis2.engine.AxisEngine.invoke(AxisEngine.java:254) at org.apache.axis2.engine.AxisEngine.receive(AxisEngine.java:160) at org.apache.axis2.transport.http.HTTPTransportUtils.processHTTPPostRequest(HTTPTransportUtils.java:173) at org.apache.axis2.transport.http.AxisServlet.doPost(AxisServlet.java:144) at javax.servlet.http.HttpServlet.service(HttpServlet.java:637) at javax.servlet.http.HttpServlet.service(HttpServlet.java:717) at org.apache.catalina.core.ApplicationFilterChain.internalDoFilter(ApplicationFilterChain.java:290) at org.apache.catalina.core.ApplicationFilterChain.doFilter(ApplicationFilterChain.java:206) at org.apache.catalina.core.ApplicationDispatcher.invoke(ApplicationDispatcher.java:646) at org.apache.catalina.core.ApplicationDispatcher.processRequest(ApplicationDispatcher.java:436) at org.apache.catalina.core.ApplicationDispatcher.doForward(ApplicationDispatcher.java:374) at org.apache.catalina.core.ApplicationDispatcher.forward(ApplicationDispatcher.java:302) at com.cloud.bridge.service.EC2MainServlet.doGetOrPost(EC2MainServlet.java:114) at com.cloud.bridge.service.EC2MainServlet.doPost(EC2MainServlet.java:89) at javax.servlet.http.HttpServlet.service(HttpServlet.java:637) at javax.servlet.http.HttpServlet.service(HttpServlet.java:717) at org.apache.catalina.core.ApplicationFilterChain.internalDoFilter(ApplicationFilterChain.java:290) at org.apache.catalina.core.ApplicationFilterChain.doFilter(ApplicationFilterChain.java:206) at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardWrapperValve.invoke(StandardWrapperValve.java:233) at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardContextValve.invoke(StandardContextValve.java:191) at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardHostValve.invoke(StandardHostValve.java:127) at org.apache.catalina.valves.ErrorReportValve.invoke(ErrorReportValve.java:102) at org.apache.catalina.valves.AccessLogValve.invoke(AccessLogValve.java:615) at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardEngineValve.invoke(StandardEngineValve.java:109) at org.apache.catalina.connector.CoyoteAdapter.service(CoyoteAdapter.java:293) at org.apache.coyote.http11.Http11NioProcessor.process(Http11NioProcessor.java:889) at org.apache.coyote.http11.Http11NioProtocol$Http11ConnectionHandler.process(Http11NioProtocol.java:744) at org.apache.tomcat.util.net.NioEndpoint$SocketProcessor.run(NioEndpoint.java:2282) at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1146) at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:615) at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:679) On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 2:22 PM, Carlos Reategui car...@reategui.comwrote: Looks like I'm on my own here I poked around the cloudstack-setup-databases script and the sql it uses drops the tables before recreating them so it is not safe for me to run that or it will kill my current cloud db. In that script I did find references to the cloud-bridge sql files found here: # ls -l /usr/share/cloudstack-bridge/setup/ total 56 -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 1592 Jun 4 11:45 cloudbridge_bucketpolicy.sql -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 1148 Jun 4 11:45 cloudbridge_db.sql -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 3711 Jun 4 11:45 cloudbridge_index.sql -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 1170 Jun 4 11:45 cloudbridge_multipart_alter.sql -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 2468 Jun 4 11:45 cloudbridge_multipart.sql -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 896 Jun 4 11:45 cloudbridge_offering_alter.sql -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 1551 Jun 4 11:45 cloudbridge_offering.sql -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 897 Jun 4 11:45 cloudbridge_policy_alter.sql -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 4462 Jun 4 11:45 cloudbridge_schema.sql -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 2365 Jun 4 11:45 deploy-db-bridge.sh -rw-r--r-- 1
Re: FW: CS 4.1.0 - this will help a number of people who struggle with Advanced Networking
I'm short on time, but here's the KVM advanced networking config we use for testing. If someone wants to write a doc based around it that would be nice. Start out KVM host with two networks, eth0, eth1. eth0 is intended for public traffic, eth0 will be guest vlans and management vlan. then create a bridge interface for each: [root@devcloud-kvm ~]# brctl show bridge name bridge id STP enabled interfaces cloud0 8000. no br0 8000.5254004eff4f no eth0 br1 8000.52540052b15e no eth1 br0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 52:54:00:4E:FF:4F inet addr:172.17.10.10 Bcast:172.17.10.255 Mask:255.255.255.0 inet6 addr: fe80::5054:ff:fe4e:ff4f/64 Scope:Link UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1 RX packets:127 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0 TX packets:30 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0 collisions:0 txqueuelen:0 RX bytes:5846 (5.7 KiB) TX bytes:4345 (4.2 KiB) br1 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 52:54:00:52:B1:5E inet addr:192.168.100.10 Bcast:192.168.100.255 Mask:255.255.255.0 inet6 addr: fe80::5054:ff:fe52:b15e/64 Scope:Link UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1 RX packets:343 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0 TX packets:153 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0 collisions:0 txqueuelen:0 RX bytes:24227 (23.6 KiB) TX bytes:29108 (28.4 KiB) eth0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 52:54:00:4E:FF:4F inet6 addr: fe80::5054:ff:fe4e:ff4f/64 Scope:Link UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1 RX packets:157 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0 TX packets:38 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0 collisions:0 txqueuelen:1000 RX bytes:12276 (11.9 KiB) TX bytes:4897 (4.7 KiB) eth1 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 52:54:00:52:B1:5E inet6 addr: fe80::5054:ff:fe52:b15e/64 Scope:Link UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1 RX packets:377 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0 TX packets:163 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0 collisions:0 txqueuelen:1000 RX bytes:34044 (33.2 KiB) TX bytes:29748 (29.0 KiB) loLink encap:Local Loopback inet addr:127.0.0.1 Mask:255.0.0.0 inet6 addr: ::1/128 Scope:Host UP LOOPBACK RUNNING MTU:16436 Metric:1 RX packets:863 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0 TX packets:863 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0 collisions:0 txqueuelen:0 RX bytes:120247 (117.4 KiB) TX bytes:120247 (117.4 KiB) Ok, now kvm host is ready. Just define the kvm traffic label for Management traffic to be 'br0', for guest to be 'br0', and for public to be 'br1'. Cloudstack will create any necessary bridges or vlans. You can leave the vlan option empty if you don't want it to create a vlan (say for management). I can perhaps go into more detail later. On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 12:33 PM, Marcus Sorensen shadow...@gmail.com wrote: Yes, that's correct. I think we need to update the documentation. The user simply needs to create a bridge where 'public' traffic will work, and then set that bridge name as the traffic label for public traffic. Then it will create the vlan device and the bridge necessary for public based on the physical ethernet device of that bridge. Note, in this example, it is only looking for cloudVirBr for compatibility, if there are existing cloudVirBr bridges then the agent will continue to create cloudVirBr bridges, otherwise, it will create breth bridges, which allow the same vlan number on different physical interfaces. We can easily create some concrete examples for this... such as the one represented in devcloud-kvm by tools/devcloud-kvm/devcloud-kvm-advanced.cfg On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 12:06 PM, Edison Su edison...@citrix.com wrote: The KVM installation guide at http://cloudstack.apache.org/docs/en-US/Apache_CloudStack/4.1.0/html/Installation_Guide/hypervisor-kvm-install-flow.html , is unnecessary complicated and inaccurate. For example, we don't need to configure vlan on kvm host by users themselves, cloudstack-agent will create vlans automatically. All users need to do is to create bridges(if the default bridge created by cloudstack-agent is not enough), then add these bridge names from cloudstack mgt server UI during the zone creation. -Original Message- From: Noel Kendall [mailto:noeldkend...@hotmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, July 31, 2013 9:49 AM To: users@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: CS 4.1.0 - this will help a number of people who struggle with Advanced Networking The documentation for installation in a KVM environment is utterly misleading. The documentation reads as though one can set up the bridge for the public network with any name one chooses, the default being cloudbr0. You cannot use just any old name. That simply will
CloudStack 302 to 41 XenServer Issue
Hello all, Just upgraded my mixed KVM/XenServer environment form 3.0.2 to 4.1. All of my KVM hosts seem happy, but all of my XenServer (5.6SP2) hosts show as disconnected and are not coming back. Has anyone experienced this?
Re: Shared Network Issue HELP?!
After posting this I thought about it more and answered my own question. I see this type of setup being a management nightmare, e.g. rouge dhcp servers or anything else a user would attempt without the proper vlan/pvlan segmentation on the guest network in place it would be a hot mess. Thanks Guys! Steve Searles Zimcom Internet Solutions, Inc. http://www.zimcom.net Phone. (513)231-9500 Fax. (513)624-3909 Toll Free. (888)624-3910 On Aug 1, 2013, at 2:43 PM, Steve Searles st...@zimcom.net wrote: Hello everyone, I am new to Cloudstack and have it deployed in our lab currently so go easy :) I have everything working as expected with the advanced network zone, vmware support, and multiple vlan isolation working properly. I have a few questions I would like to ask here about networking options inside Cloudstack that I was unable to acertain from the documentation. Hopefully one of you guys can steer me in the right direction. MY LAB SETUP Cloudstack 4.1.0 (Compiled from Source w/vmware support) Zone1- Advanced – MGMT(untagged): 172.29.16.0/21 STORAGE(untagged): 172.29.16.0/21 GUEST(VLAN 601): 172.29.24.0/21 PUBLIC(VLAN 602): x.x.x.x/24 Currently I create an account and can add a guest network, the virtual router deploys properly assigns the necessary vlan for the isolated network the guest IP is assigned and a public ip is assigned from the public IP pool as expected this works properly (Awesome). Deploying a VPC under a user account functions properly as well (Very Cool). What I am looking for is a configuration that I guess be best described as a shared isolated network? Where an instance is provisioned and assigned an rfc1918 address from a large guest pool much like I have currently setup with the “Default Shared Network”. And a user can request an IP be assigned from the public pool and create pat/nat translations and firewall rules just as on the isolated network I tested. This is for a multi-tennent setup where each user does not need to create their own guest network and vlan isolation between accounts is not necessary thus no need to burn a vlan and a vrouter for every customer account. Based on what I am seeing this functionality seems to already be present. If I provision and instance on the Default Shared Network (VLAN601) in my setup, the machine is assigned the proper RFC1918 address from the pool but when I try to allocate a public ip from the network tab I receive the allocation error below. Should this functionality even work? The problem seems obvious but I don’t see where I can make the owners match even using cloudmokey. 2013-08-01 13:12:32,000 DEBUG [cloud.user.AccountManagerImpl] (Job-Executor-21:job-269) Access to Acct[4-zimcom] granted to Acct[4-zimcom] by DomainChecker_EnhancerByCloudStack_dd56169d 2013-08-01 13:12:32,020 DEBUG [cloud.user.AccountManagerImpl] (Job-Executor-21:job-269) Access to Ip[209.212.252.6-1] granted to Acct[4-zimcom] by DomainChecker_EnhancerByCloudStack_dd56169d 2013-08-01 13:12:32,031 DEBUG [cloud.user.AccountManagerImpl] (Job-Executor-21:job-269) Access to Ntwk[204|Guest|7] granted to Acct[4-zimcom] by DomainChecker_EnhancerByCloudStack_dd56169d 2013-08-01 13:12:32,042 ERROR [cloud.async.AsyncJobManagerImpl] (Job-Executor-21:job-269) Unexpected exception while executing org.apache.cloudstack.api.command.user.address.AssociateIPAddrCmd com.cloud.exception.InvalidParameterValueException: The owner of the network is not the same as owner of the IP at com.cloud.network.NetworkManagerImpl.associateIPToGuestNetwork(NetworkManagerImpl.java:744) at com.cloud.utils.component.ComponentInstantiationPostProcessor$InterceptorDispatcher.intercept(ComponentInstantiationPostProcessor.java:125) at com.cloud.network.NetworkServiceImpl.associateIPToNetwork(NetworkServiceImpl.java:2852) at com.cloud.utils.component.ComponentInstantiationPostProcessor$InterceptorDispatcher.intercept(ComponentInstantiationPostProcessor.java:125) at org.apache.cloudstack.api.command.user.address.AssociateIPAddrCmd.execute(AssociateIPAddrC I also created a second zone with basic networking but I did not see a way to accomplish this with that setup either as it looks like the machine is directly assigned a public address and access control is handled via SG’s with ingress and egress filtering. Can anyone help me out? Thanks in Advance. Steve Searles http://www.zimcom.net Phone. (513)231-9500 Fax. (513)624-3909 Toll Free. (888)624-3910
Update resolve.conf search string
Is there way to persistently change the search entry for the /etc/resolv.conf on cloudstack clients? How do I ensure that the system router vm takes care of this? Curtis Old Neustar, Inc. / Neustarlabs / Senior Research Engineer 46000 Center Oak Plaza Sterling, VA 20166 Office: +1.571.434.5384 Mobile: +1.540.532.2230 / curtis@neustar.bizmailto:curtis@neustar.biz / www.neustar.bizhttp://www.neustar.biz/ The information contained in this e-mail message is intended only for the use of the recipient(s) named above and may contain confidential and/or privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient you have received this e-mail message in error and any review, dissemination, distribution, or copying of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately and delete the original message.
CloudStack NIC ordering ACS4.1
Hi, Before 4.1 if you added multiple NICs to a VM they would appear with the Default as eth0 and then in the order that you specified them in the API. In 4.1 that has appeared to have changed Can someone tell me how the order that the NICs are assigned as eth0, eth1, eth2 etc is decided - or how to control it, especially when we have multiple physical guest networks. Regards Paul Angus Senior Consultant / Cloud Architect [cid:image002.png@01CE1071.C6CC9C10] S: +44 20 3603 0540tel:+442036030540 | M: +4tel:+44796816158147711418784 paul.an...@shapeblue.commailto:geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com | www.shapeblue.com | Twitter:@shapebluehttps://twitter.com/ ShapeBlue Ltd, 53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London, WC2N 4HS ShapeBlue are proud to be sponsoring CloudStack Collaboration Conference NA [https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/download/attachments/30760149/CloudStack+Collaboration+Conference+Banner+v2+Blue+Background+Only.jpg?version=3modificationDate=1367282397297]http://www.cloudstackcollab.net/ Apache CloudStack Bootcamp training courses 19/20 June, Londonhttp://www.shapeblue.com/cloudstack-bootcamp-training-course/ 22/23 June, Santa Clara CAhttp://www.shapeblue.com/cloudstack-bootcamp-training-course/ 10/11 July, Bangalore, Indiahttp://www.shapeblue.com/cloudstack-bootcamp-training-course/ 21/22 August, Londonhttp://www.shapeblue.com/cloudstack-bootcamp-training-course/ This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any views or opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Shape Blue Ltd or related companies. If you are not the intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any action based upon its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please contact the sender if you believe you have received this email in error. Shape Blue Ltd is a company incorporated in England Wales. ShapeBlue Services India LLP is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue is a registered trademark.
what is this log message?
Hi, Who can tell me what this message is: 2013-08-01 10:39:21 kvm1.test.com 1 10:39:21 kvm1 CGRE[3124]: Warning: invalid file format of /proc/31088/status Thank you. Steven Liang Linux System Admin Phone: 1.416.499.8009 ext. 2865 Cell Phone: 1.647.718.5292 Email: stevenli...@yesup.com www.yesup.com | account.yesup.com
IP Address assigned by CS is not passed to new instance VM
Hello, We are trying to create a new instance with basic networking setup using CentOS 6.0 ISO. Cloudstack assigns the correct IP Address (in my case: 10.60.176.110) to this new centOS instance, but once you log into this VM, check ifconfig and /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcfg-eth0, the IP Address and default gateway information are not passed through correctly. The same issue with hostname – instead of centos-107, it shows as localhost.localdomain. Please see attached screenshots. Has anyone experienced the similar issue? Our environment: 1. CS 4.2 2. XenServer 6.0.2 3. CentOS 6.0 ISO Thanks, Cindy
Re: IP Address assigned by CS is not passed to new instance VM
Attach the screenshots [cid:CFDFC580-184D-4F0E-AF41-5AF18794D413][cid:7E1641EF-DEBC-4A25-90B3-3B132C1A66B0] [cid:DA5AC137-FC18-4A63-9367-7583EB1A6940] From: Cindy Jiang cji...@infoblox.commailto:cji...@infoblox.com Reply-To: users@cloudstack.apache.orgmailto:users@cloudstack.apache.org users@cloudstack.apache.orgmailto:users@cloudstack.apache.org Date: Thursday, August 1, 2013 2:24 PM To: users@cloudstack.apache.orgmailto:users@cloudstack.apache.org users@cloudstack.apache.orgmailto:users@cloudstack.apache.org, Soheil Eizadi seiz...@infoblox.commailto:seiz...@infoblox.com Subject: IP Address assigned by CS is not passed to new instance VM Hello, We are trying to create a new instance with basic networking setup using CentOS 6.0 ISO. Cloudstack assigns the correct IP Address (in my case: 10.60.176.110) to this new centOS instance, but once you log into this VM, check ifconfig and /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcfg-eth0, the IP Address and default gateway information are not passed through correctly. The same issue with hostname – instead of centos-107, it shows as localhost.localdomain. Please see attached screenshots. Has anyone experienced the similar issue? Our environment: 1. CS 4.2 2. XenServer 6.0.2 3. CentOS 6.0 ISO Thanks, Cindy
Re: FW: CS 4.1.0 - this will help a number of people who struggle with Advanced Networking
Here's a simple (not recommended) one-nic setup: http://marcus.mlsorensen.com/cloudstack-extras/cs-4.1-kvm-networking-one-nic.rtf And a simple two-nic setup: http://marcus.mlsorensen.com/cloudstack-extras/cs-4.1-kvm-networking-two-nic.rtf Hasty docs put together on the road... On Thu, Aug 1, 2013 at 11:28 AM, Marcus Sorensen shadow...@gmail.com wrote: I'm short on time, but here's the KVM advanced networking config we use for testing. If someone wants to write a doc based around it that would be nice. Start out KVM host with two networks, eth0, eth1. eth0 is intended for public traffic, eth0 will be guest vlans and management vlan. then create a bridge interface for each: [root@devcloud-kvm ~]# brctl show bridge name bridge id STP enabled interfaces cloud0 8000. no br0 8000.5254004eff4f no eth0 br1 8000.52540052b15e no eth1 br0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 52:54:00:4E:FF:4F inet addr:172.17.10.10 Bcast:172.17.10.255 Mask:255.255.255.0 inet6 addr: fe80::5054:ff:fe4e:ff4f/64 Scope:Link UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1 RX packets:127 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0 TX packets:30 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0 collisions:0 txqueuelen:0 RX bytes:5846 (5.7 KiB) TX bytes:4345 (4.2 KiB) br1 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 52:54:00:52:B1:5E inet addr:192.168.100.10 Bcast:192.168.100.255 Mask:255.255.255.0 inet6 addr: fe80::5054:ff:fe52:b15e/64 Scope:Link UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1 RX packets:343 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0 TX packets:153 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0 collisions:0 txqueuelen:0 RX bytes:24227 (23.6 KiB) TX bytes:29108 (28.4 KiB) eth0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 52:54:00:4E:FF:4F inet6 addr: fe80::5054:ff:fe4e:ff4f/64 Scope:Link UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1 RX packets:157 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0 TX packets:38 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0 collisions:0 txqueuelen:1000 RX bytes:12276 (11.9 KiB) TX bytes:4897 (4.7 KiB) eth1 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 52:54:00:52:B1:5E inet6 addr: fe80::5054:ff:fe52:b15e/64 Scope:Link UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1 RX packets:377 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0 TX packets:163 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0 collisions:0 txqueuelen:1000 RX bytes:34044 (33.2 KiB) TX bytes:29748 (29.0 KiB) loLink encap:Local Loopback inet addr:127.0.0.1 Mask:255.0.0.0 inet6 addr: ::1/128 Scope:Host UP LOOPBACK RUNNING MTU:16436 Metric:1 RX packets:863 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0 TX packets:863 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0 collisions:0 txqueuelen:0 RX bytes:120247 (117.4 KiB) TX bytes:120247 (117.4 KiB) Ok, now kvm host is ready. Just define the kvm traffic label for Management traffic to be 'br0', for guest to be 'br0', and for public to be 'br1'. Cloudstack will create any necessary bridges or vlans. You can leave the vlan option empty if you don't want it to create a vlan (say for management). I can perhaps go into more detail later. On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 12:33 PM, Marcus Sorensen shadow...@gmail.com wrote: Yes, that's correct. I think we need to update the documentation. The user simply needs to create a bridge where 'public' traffic will work, and then set that bridge name as the traffic label for public traffic. Then it will create the vlan device and the bridge necessary for public based on the physical ethernet device of that bridge. Note, in this example, it is only looking for cloudVirBr for compatibility, if there are existing cloudVirBr bridges then the agent will continue to create cloudVirBr bridges, otherwise, it will create breth bridges, which allow the same vlan number on different physical interfaces. We can easily create some concrete examples for this... such as the one represented in devcloud-kvm by tools/devcloud-kvm/devcloud-kvm-advanced.cfg On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 12:06 PM, Edison Su edison...@citrix.com wrote: The KVM installation guide at http://cloudstack.apache.org/docs/en-US/Apache_CloudStack/4.1.0/html/Installation_Guide/hypervisor-kvm-install-flow.html , is unnecessary complicated and inaccurate. For example, we don't need to configure vlan on kvm host by users themselves, cloudstack-agent will create vlans automatically. All users need to do is to create bridges(if the default bridge created by cloudstack-agent is not enough), then add these bridge names from cloudstack mgt server UI during the zone creation. -Original Message- From: Noel Kendall [mailto:noeldkend...@hotmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, July 31, 2013
Re: IP Address assigned by CS is not passed to new instance VM
Somehow I can't attach screenshots. So I copy the outputs of this CentOS instance here. As you can see, the ethernet0 interface configuration doesn't contain any ip address or default gateway information, even though Cloudstack assigns these information correctly. [root@localhost network-scripts]# ifconfig loLink encap:Local Loopback inet addr:127.0.0.1 Mask:255.0.0.0 inet6 addr: ::1/128 Scope:Host UP LOOPBACK RUNNING MTU:16436 Metric:1 RX packets:0 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0 TX packets:0 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0 collisions:0 txqueuelen:0 RX bytes:0 (0.0 b) TX bytes:0 (0.0 b) [root@localhost network-scripts]# hostname Localhost.localdomain [root@localhost network-scripts]# cat ifcfg-eth0 DEVICE=eth0 HWADDR=06:57:6E:00:00:2A NM_CONTROLLED=yes ONBOOT=no From: Cindy Jiang cji...@infoblox.commailto:cji...@infoblox.com Reply-To: users@cloudstack.apache.orgmailto:users@cloudstack.apache.org users@cloudstack.apache.orgmailto:users@cloudstack.apache.org Date: Thursday, August 1, 2013 2:34 PM To: users@cloudstack.apache.orgmailto:users@cloudstack.apache.org users@cloudstack.apache.orgmailto:users@cloudstack.apache.org, Soheil Eizadi seiz...@infoblox.commailto:seiz...@infoblox.com Subject: Re: IP Address assigned by CS is not passed to new instance VM Attach the screenshots [cid:CFDFC580-184D-4F0E-AF41-5AF18794D413][cid:7E1641EF-DEBC-4A25-90B3-3B132C1A66B0] [cid:DA5AC137-FC18-4A63-9367-7583EB1A6940] From: Cindy Jiang cji...@infoblox.commailto:cji...@infoblox.com Reply-To: users@cloudstack.apache.orgmailto:users@cloudstack.apache.org users@cloudstack.apache.orgmailto:users@cloudstack.apache.org Date: Thursday, August 1, 2013 2:24 PM To: users@cloudstack.apache.orgmailto:users@cloudstack.apache.org users@cloudstack.apache.orgmailto:users@cloudstack.apache.org, Soheil Eizadi seiz...@infoblox.commailto:seiz...@infoblox.com Subject: IP Address assigned by CS is not passed to new instance VM Hello, We are trying to create a new instance with basic networking setup using CentOS 6.0 ISO. Cloudstack assigns the correct IP Address (in my case: 10.60.176.110) to this new centOS instance, but once you log into this VM, check ifconfig and /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcfg-eth0, the IP Address and default gateway information are not passed through correctly. The same issue with hostname – instead of centos-107, it shows as localhost.localdomain. Please see attached screenshots. Has anyone experienced the similar issue? Our environment: 1. CS 4.2 2. XenServer 6.0.2 3. CentOS 6.0 ISO Thanks, Cindy
Re: IP Address assigned by CS is not passed to new instance VM
You cannot attach anything or use HTML on Apache mailing lists. Can you try and bring up the interface up manually ifconfig eth0 up dhclient eth0 Does the built-in template work? On 8/1/13 2:45 PM, Cindy Jiang cji...@infoblox.com wrote: Somehow I can't attach screenshots. So I copy the outputs of this CentOS instance here. As you can see, the ethernet0 interface configuration doesn't contain any ip address or default gateway information, even though Cloudstack assigns these information correctly. [root@localhost network-scripts]# ifconfig loLink encap:Local Loopback inet addr:127.0.0.1 Mask:255.0.0.0 inet6 addr: ::1/128 Scope:Host UP LOOPBACK RUNNING MTU:16436 Metric:1 RX packets:0 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0 TX packets:0 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0 collisions:0 txqueuelen:0 RX bytes:0 (0.0 b) TX bytes:0 (0.0 b) [root@localhost network-scripts]# hostname Localhost.localdomain [root@localhost network-scripts]# cat ifcfg-eth0 DEVICE=eth0 HWADDR=06:57:6E:00:00:2A NM_CONTROLLED=yes ONBOOT=no From: Cindy Jiang cji...@infoblox.commailto:cji...@infoblox.com Reply-To: users@cloudstack.apache.orgmailto:users@cloudstack.apache.org users@cloudstack.apache.orgmailto:users@cloudstack.apache.org Date: Thursday, August 1, 2013 2:34 PM To: users@cloudstack.apache.orgmailto:users@cloudstack.apache.org users@cloudstack.apache.orgmailto:users@cloudstack.apache.org, Soheil Eizadi seiz...@infoblox.commailto:seiz...@infoblox.com Subject: Re: IP Address assigned by CS is not passed to new instance VM Attach the screenshots [cid:CFDFC580-184D-4F0E-AF41-5AF18794D413][cid:7E1641EF-DEBC-4A25-90B3-3B1 32C1A66B0] [cid:DA5AC137-FC18-4A63-9367-7583EB1A6940] From: Cindy Jiang cji...@infoblox.commailto:cji...@infoblox.com Reply-To: users@cloudstack.apache.orgmailto:users@cloudstack.apache.org users@cloudstack.apache.orgmailto:users@cloudstack.apache.org Date: Thursday, August 1, 2013 2:24 PM To: users@cloudstack.apache.orgmailto:users@cloudstack.apache.org users@cloudstack.apache.orgmailto:users@cloudstack.apache.org, Soheil Eizadi seiz...@infoblox.commailto:seiz...@infoblox.com Subject: IP Address assigned by CS is not passed to new instance VM Hello, We are trying to create a new instance with basic networking setup using CentOS 6.0 ISO. Cloudstack assigns the correct IP Address (in my case: 10.60.176.110) to this new centOS instance, but once you log into this VM, check ifconfig and /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcfg-eth0, the IP Address and default gateway information are not passed through correctly. The same issue with hostname instead of centos-107, it shows as localhost.localdomain. Please see attached screenshots. Has anyone experienced the similar issue? Our environment: 1. CS 4.2 2. XenServer 6.0.2 3. CentOS 6.0 ISO Thanks, Cindy
Re: what is this log message?
Where do you see this log? In CloudStack logs or in /var/log/messages? Are there any surrounding logs? From: Steven Liang stevenli...@yesup.commailto:stevenli...@yesup.com Reply-To: users@cloudstack.apache.orgmailto:users@cloudstack.apache.org users@cloudstack.apache.orgmailto:users@cloudstack.apache.org Date: Thursday, August 1, 2013 1:51 PM To: users@cloudstack.apache.orgmailto:users@cloudstack.apache.org users@cloudstack.apache.orgmailto:users@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: what is this log message? Hi, Who can tell me what this message is: 2013-08-01 10:39:21 kvm1.test.com 1 10:39:21 kvm1 CGRE[3124]: Warning: invalid file format of /proc/31088/status Thank you. Steven Liang Linux System Admin Phone: 1.416.499.8009 ext. 2865 Cell Phone: 1.647.718.5292 Email: stevenli...@yesup.commailto:stevenli...@yesup.com www.yesup.comhttp://www.yesup.com | account.yesup.comhttp://account.yesup.com [Yesup]
Re: Change host password??
Hi, I updated the bug with more details. The document is close but not quite correct, and there is some info that should be added. 1. It should be the host_details table, not the host table. 2. For vSphere, in addition to updating host_details, you also need to update the cluster_details table. 3. For XenServer you should use the updateHostPassword API (AFAIK this command doesn't work for other hypervisors yet). Best regards, Kirk On 07/31/2013 05:32 PM, Kirk Jantzer wrote: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-3990 On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 7:30 PM, Kirk Jantzer kirk.jant...@gmail.comwrote: Thanks Prashant. Will do Jessica. On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 7:27 PM, Jessica Tomechak jessica.tomec...@citrix.com wrote: Sounds like a document bug to me. Please file it in the bugbase! Jessica T. From: Kirk Jantzer [kirk.jant...@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, July 31, 2013 4:17 PM To: Cloudstack users mailing list Subject: Change host password?? http://cloudstack.apache.org/docs/en-US/Apache_CloudStack/4.1.0/html/Admin_Guide/change-host-password.html This document says to update the password column, which doesn't exist in the host table. Is this a document bug? -- Regards, Kirk Jantzer http://about.met/kirkjantzer -- Regards, Kirk Jantzer c: (678) 561-5475 http://about.met/kirkjantzer
Re: Centos and FreeBSD templates
I thought this existed (at least for KVM) https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Resize+Data+Volumes On 8/1/13 6:11 AM, Nux! n...@li.nux.ro wrote: Hi, Should someone need templates, I've made some Centos 6 and FreeBSD 9 64bit templates for KVM, both are VirtIO enabled and have the password and key scripts installed (and working from what I tested). They have a random root size of 20 GB. Having said that, I'd really, really, really like Cloudstack could resize the root disk (as the competition does); for me it's the numero uno problem that stops a central template repo (market place?) from existing. Imposing random root sizes on people doesn't seem right. http://li.nux.ro/download/cloudstack/images/ Lucian -- Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology! Nux! www.nux.ro
Re: CloudStack 302 to 41 XenServer Issue
Logs? On 8/1/13 12:53 PM, John Skinner john.skin...@appcore.com wrote: Hello all, Just upgraded my mixed KVM/XenServer environment form 3.0.2 to 4.1. All of my KVM hosts seem happy, but all of my XenServer (5.6SP2) hosts show as disconnected and are not coming back. Has anyone experienced this?
Re: what is this log message?
in /var/log/messages On 08/01/2013 05:52 PM, Chiradeep Vittal wrote: Where do you see this log? In CloudStack logs or in /var/log/messages? Are there any surrounding logs? From: Steven Liang stevenli...@yesup.com Reply-To: "users@cloudstack.apache.org" users@cloudstack.apache.org Date: Thursday, August 1, 2013 1:51 PM To: "users@cloudstack.apache.org" users@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: what is this log message? Hi, Who can tell me what this message is: 2013-08-01 10:39:21 kvm1.test.com 1 10:39:21 kvm1 CGRE[3124]: Warning: invalid file format of /proc/31088/status Thank you. Steven Liang Linux System Admin Phone: 1.416.499.8009 ext. 2865 Cell Phone: 1.647.718.5292 Email: stevenli...@yesup.com www.yesup.com | account.yesup.com -- Steven Liang Linux System Admin Phone: 1.416.499.8009 ext. 2865 Cell Phone: 1.647.718.5292 Email: stevenli...@yesup.com www.yesup.com | account.yesup.com
RE: Unable to start System VM
Chitra, Have you read cloudstack install guide? Specifically section 4.5.8? Regards Ilya From: Chitra Manjunath [mailto:chitra_manjun...@infosys.com] Sent: Thursday, August 01, 2013 8:41 AM To: users@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Unable to start System VM Hi All, I attached the management server log file. log saying Zone is not Ready, templates are not ready. But I added the Zone and is enabled. Where we need to download the System VM template? Please anyone solve this problem. Very Urgent Thanks Chitra.M CAUTION - Disclaimer * This e-mail contains PRIVILEGED AND CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION intended solely for the use of the addressee(s). If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender by e-mail and delete the original message. Further, you are not to copy, disclose, or distribute this e-mail or its contents to any other person and any such actions are unlawful. This e-mail may contain viruses. Infosys has taken every reasonable precaution to minimize this risk, but is not liable for any damage you may sustain as a result of any virus in this e-mail. You should carry out your own virus checks before opening the e-mail or attachment. Infosys reserves the right to monitor and review the content of all messages sent to or from this e-mail address. Messages sent to or from this e-mail address may be stored on the Infosys e-mail system. ***INFOSYS End of Disclaimer INFOSYS***
RE: Change host password??
Thanks for the details. Now all we need is for someone to pick up and fix the bug! Jessica T. From: Kirk Kosinski [kirkkosin...@gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, August 01, 2013 2:53 PM To: users@cloudstack.apache.org Cc: Kirk Jantzer Subject: Re: Change host password?? Hi, I updated the bug with more details. The document is close but not quite correct, and there is some info that should be added. 1. It should be the host_details table, not the host table. 2. For vSphere, in addition to updating host_details, you also need to update the cluster_details table. 3. For XenServer you should use the updateHostPassword API (AFAIK this command doesn't work for other hypervisors yet). Best regards, Kirk On 07/31/2013 05:32 PM, Kirk Jantzer wrote: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-3990 On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 7:30 PM, Kirk Jantzer kirk.jant...@gmail.comwrote: Thanks Prashant. Will do Jessica. On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 7:27 PM, Jessica Tomechak jessica.tomec...@citrix.com wrote: Sounds like a document bug to me. Please file it in the bugbase! Jessica T. From: Kirk Jantzer [kirk.jant...@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, July 31, 2013 4:17 PM To: Cloudstack users mailing list Subject: Change host password?? http://cloudstack.apache.org/docs/en-US/Apache_CloudStack/4.1.0/html/Admin_Guide/change-host-password.html This document says to update the password column, which doesn't exist in the host table. Is this a document bug? -- Regards, Kirk Jantzer http://about.met/kirkjantzer -- Regards, Kirk Jantzer c: (678) 561-5475 http://about.met/kirkjantzer
RE: external load balancer, shared network, advanced networking
OK thanks for this info. I also am unable to get this to work with isolated networks. I created a service offering for isolated networks with source nat and load balancing enabled, and Supported Source NAT type: per account When I try and start an instance on a network created using this offering I get the following error in the logs: http://pastie.org/8198148 -Original Message- From: Sanjeev Neelarapu [mailto:sanjeev.neelar...@citrix.com] Sent: Wednesday, July 31, 2013 12:33 AM To: users@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: RE: external load balancer, shared network, advanced networking Hi Brian, In 4.1 , the configuration only works with isolated networks. From next ACS release onwards this would be supported. Thanks, Sanjeev -Original Message- From: Brian Galura [mailto:brian.gal...@citrix.com] Sent: Tuesday, July 30, 2013 11:58 PM To: users@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: external load balancer, shared network, advanced networking Im using CS4.1 and trying to get a netscaler to work as a load balancer as the subject describes. Is it true that this configuration will only work with isolated networks? Does this mean that the isolated vlans all need to be trunked up to the netscaler? Im having a hard time finding definitive documentation on this point.
Re: vhd-util 'failed to coalesce' while XenServer host executing 'create_privatetemplate_from_snapshot.sh'
Try this: http://support.citrix.com/article/CTX133465 And this http://forums.citrix.com/thread.jspa?threadID=301226start=0tstart=0 On 7/31/13 6:10 AM, Yan Ke yan...@yonyou.com wrote: Hello there, I'm working on integrating CloudStack 4.0.1 with XenServer 6.0.2. I have managed setting up a basic network configuration, launching zone, launching guest instances as well as creating volume snapshots, but afterward I'm encountering following issue: The 'create template from snapshot' operation always fail. The management server log indicates that following Exception has been thrown during the operation process: com.cloud.utils.exception.CloudRuntimeException: create_privatetemplate_from_snapshot failed due to failed to coalesce /var/run/cloud_mount/d865f1ad-a164-443f-8c05-d4c56e690f25/b1a56afd-a943-4a 43 -87b8-c2e2ab10126f.vhd to /var/run/cloud_mount/58d3242f-d4fb-41e9-a20e-0686ffda9eaa/85bd1f75-1d10-48 c4 -ae79-d2e5ece8b6f1.vhd at com.cloud.hypervisor.xen.resource.CitrixResourceBase.createTemplateFromSna ps hot(CitrixResourceBase.java:2618) at com.cloud.hypervisor.xen.resource.CitrixResourceBase.execute(CitrixResourc eB ase.java:6398) at com.cloud.hypervisor.xen.resource.CitrixResourceBase.executeRequest(Citrix Re sourceBase.java:475) at com.cloud.hypervisor.xen.resource.XenServer56Resource.executeRequest(XenSe rv er56Resource.java:73) at com.cloud.agent.manager.DirectAgentAttache$Task.run(DirectAgentAttache.jav a: 191) at java.util.concurrent.Executors$RunnableAdapter.call(Executors.java:471) at java.util.concurrent.FutureTask$Sync.innerRun(FutureTask.java:334) at java.util.concurrent.FutureTask.run(FutureTask.java:166) at java.util.concurrent.ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor$ScheduledFutureTask.acces s$ 101(ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor.java:165) at java.util.concurrent.ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor$ScheduledFutureTask.run(S ch eduledThreadPoolExecutor.java:266) at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java: 11 10) at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java :6 03) at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:679) With some effort on debugging the management server code, I figured out that the operation will finally lead to an invocation on the 'create_privatetemplate_from_snapshot.sh' script on the XenServer host. So I logged into the XenServer host and manually invoked the script with the same parameter from cloudstack, and it ended up as follow: [root@xenserver-modaxvnu bin]# sh -x /opt/xensource/bin/create_privatetemplate_from_snapshot.sh 20.10.97.182:/export/secondary/snapshots/2/10/85bd1f75-1d10-48c4-ae79-d2e5 ec e8b6f1.vhd 20.10.97.182:/export/secondary/template/tmpl/2/218 7a51626c-dd10-43ca-b65a-162e88cf1188 + options=tcp,soft,timeo=133,retrans=1 + '[' -z 20.10.97.182:/export/secondary/snapshots/2/10/85bd1f75-1d10-48c4-ae79-d2e5 ec e8b6f1.vhd ']' + snapshoturl=20.10.97.182:/export/secondary/snapshots/2/10 + vhdfilename=85bd1f75-1d10-48c4-ae79-d2e5ece8b6f1.vhd + '[' -z 20.10.97.182:/export/secondary/template/tmpl/2/218 ']' + templateurl=20.10.97.182:/export/secondary/template/tmpl/2/218 + '[' -z 7a51626c-dd10-43ca-b65a-162e88cf1188 ']' + tmpltLocalDir=7a51626c-dd10-43ca-b65a-162e88cf1188 ++ uuidgen -r + snapshotdir=/var/run/cloud_mount/0be144dd-782a-45a0-9e88-ba4779b5c86b + mkdir -p /var/run/cloud_mount/0be144dd-782a-45a0-9e88-ba4779b5c86b + '[' 0 -ne 0 ']' + mount -o tcp,soft,timeo=133,retrans=1 20.10.97.182:/export/secondary/snapshots/2/10 /var/run/cloud_mount/0be144dd-782a-45a0-9e88-ba4779b5c86b + '[' 0 -ne 0 ']' + templatedir=/var/run/cloud_mount/7a51626c-dd10-43ca-b65a-162e88cf1188 + mkdir -p /var/run/cloud_mount/7a51626c-dd10-43ca-b65a-162e88cf1188 + '[' 0 -ne 0 ']' + mount -o tcp,soft,timeo=133,retrans=1 20.10.97.182:/export/secondary/template/tmpl/2/218 /var/run/cloud_mount/7a51626c-dd10-43ca-b65a-162e88cf1188 + '[' 0 -ne 0 ']' + VHDUTIL=/opt/xensource/bin/vhd-util ++ uuidgen -r + templateuuid=3d1cf0b6-3eb5-4a8d-867b-ae16d14ce3ca + desvhd=/var/run/cloud_mount/7a51626c-dd10-43ca-b65a-162e88cf1188/3d1cf0b6- 3e b5-4a8d-867b-ae16d14ce3ca.vhd + srcvhd=/var/run/cloud_mount/0be144dd-782a-45a0-9e88-ba4779b5c86b/85bd1f75- 1d 10-48c4-ae79-d2e5ece8b6f1.vhd + copyvhd /var/run/cloud_mount/7a51626c-dd10-43ca-b65a-162e88cf1188/3d1cf0b6-3eb5-4a 8d -867b-ae16d14ce3ca.vhd /var/run/cloud_mount/0be144dd-782a-45a0-9e88-ba4779b5c86b/85bd1f75-1d10-48 c4 -ae79-d2e5ece8b6f1.vhd + local desvhd=/var/run/cloud_mount/7a51626c-dd10-43ca-b65a-162e88cf1188/3d1cf0b6- 3e b5-4a8d-867b-ae16d14ce3ca.vhd + local srcvhd=/var/run/cloud_mount/0be144dd-782a-45a0-9e88-ba4779b5c86b/85bd1f75- 1d 10-48c4-ae79-d2e5ece8b6f1.vhd + local parent= ++ /opt/xensource/bin/vhd-util query -p -n /var/run/cloud_mount/0be144dd-782a-45a0-9e88-ba4779b5c86b/85bd1f75-1d10-48 c4 -ae79-d2e5ece8b6f1.vhd + parent=/var/run/cloud_mount/0be144dd-782a-45a0-9e88-ba4779b5c86b/8c410e93- 98
Re: vhd-util fails to open system vm template(.vhd) file, saying it 'appears invalid'
Check this thread http://forums.citrix.com/thread.jspa?threadID=301226start=0tstart=0 On 7/30/13 3:46 AM, Rajesh Battala rajesh.batt...@citrix.com wrote: Looks like the template disk got corrupted. Can you please reseed the system vm template and try. -Original Message- From: Yan Ke [mailto:yan...@yonyou.com] Sent: Tuesday, July 30, 2013 3:39 PM To: users@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: vhd-util fails to open system vm template(.vhd) file, saying it 'appears invalid' Hello there, I'm working on setting up a basic network CloudStack 4.0.1 configuration with XenServer 6.0.2 and encountered problem: after created zone, the system vm won't start. The management server log shows Exception like this was thrown: WARN [xen.resource.CitrixResourceBase] (DirectAgent-322:) Catch Exception com.cloud.utils.exception.CloudRuntimeException on host:95cacdb9-a52d- 4d22-8684-1310cca1a87d for template: nfs://20.10.97.182/export/secondary/template/tmpl/1/1/ due to com.cloud.utils.exception.CloudRuntimeException: can not create vdi in sr 3938e40f-99fe-cfc4-f729-00134eb32af0 com.cloud.utils.exception.CloudRuntimeException: can not create vdi in sr 3938e40f-99fe-cfc4-f729-00134eb32af0 at com.cloud.hypervisor.xen.resource.CitrixResourceBase.copy_vhd_from_seco ndarystorage(CitrixResourceBase.java:2672) at com.cloud.hypervisor.xen.resource.CitrixResourceBase.execute(CitrixResour c eBase.java:2694) at com.cloud.hypervisor.xen.resource.CitrixResourceBase.executeRequest(Citri x ResourceBase.java:481) at com.cloud.hypervisor.xen.resource.XenServer56Resource.executeRequest(Xe nServer56Resource.java:73) at com.cloud.agent.manager.DirectAgentAttache$Task.run(DirectAgentAttache.j ava:191) at java.util.concurrent.Executors$RunnableAdapter.call(Executors.java:471) at java.util.concurrent.FutureTask$Sync.innerRun(FutureTask.java:334) at java.util.concurrent.FutureTask.run(FutureTask.java:166) at java.util.concurrent.ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor$ScheduledFutureTask.acc ess$101(ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor.java:165) at java.util.concurrent.ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor$ScheduledFutureTask.run (ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor.java:266) at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.jav a:1110) at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.ja va:603) at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:679) by stepping-into the code, I figured out this method 'copy_vhd_from_secondarystorage(CitrixResourceBase.java:2672)' will finally invoke the 'copy_vhd_from_secondarystorage.sh' on XenServer host, so I logged into the XenServer host, manually invoked the 'copy_vhd_from_secondarystorage.sh' with same parameter from cloudstack, which fails as follow: [root@xenserver-modaxvnu /]# /opt/xensource/bin/copy_vhd_from_secondarystorage.sh 20.10.97.182:/export/secondary/template/tmpl/1/1/ 3938e40f-99fe-cfc4-f729-00134eb32af0 cloud-e6e25ca4-6a3f-4990-9e93-125b229cab0c Syntax error: Unknown switch: -22MiB For usage run: 'xe help' 9#can not create vdi in sr 3938e40f-99fe-cfc4-f729-00134eb32af0 with a little effort on debugging the script, it shows that the error occurred at: /opt/xensource/bin/vhd-util query -v -n /var/run/cloud_mount/c57e417b- 4e9f-4c8b-8e67-087942422df3//8e62f48f-39e7-4543-9106-f2f12ca39946.vhd + size='error opening /var/run/cloud_mount/c57e417b-4e9f-4c8b-8e67-087942422df3//8e62f48f- 39e7-4543-9106-f2f12ca39946.vhd: -22' the 'vhd-util' failed to open the vm template file on secondary storage. I then tried following command on the management server, which directly invoke vhd-util and it shows: [root@managementserver ~]# /usr/lib64/cloud/common/scripts/vm/hypervisor/xenserver/vhd-util read -p -n /export/secondary/template/tmpl/1/1/8e62f48f-39e7-4543-9106- f2f12ca39946.vhd Failed to open /export/secondary/template/tmpl/1/1/8e62f48f-39e7-4543-9106- f2f12ca39946.vhd: -22 /export/secondary/template/tmpl/1/1/8e62f48f-39e7-4543-9106- f2f12ca39946.vhd appears invalid; dumping headers VHD Footer Summary: --- Cookie : QFI Features: (0x) File format version : Major: 0, Minor: 0 Data offset : 16 Timestamp : Sat Jan 1 00:00:00 2000 Creator Application : '}' Creator version : Major: 0, Minor: 0 Creator OS : Unknown! Original disk size : 0 MB (196608 Bytes) Current disk size : 0 MB (65536 Bytes) Geometry: Cyl: 0, Hds: 0, Sctrs: 1 : = 0 MB (0 Bytes) Disk type : None Checksum: 0x0|0xfd8c (Bad!) UUID: ---- Saved state : No Hidden : 0 VHD Header Summary: --- Cookie : Data offset (unusd) : 0 Table offset: 0 Header version
Re: CloudStack 4.1 AWS API error: Client: The service cannot be found for the endpoint reference (EPR)
Francois, the 4.1 version also supports the Query API. You may be able to use Boto See https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/x/4gHVAQ On 7/30/13 11:47 AM, François Bousquet francois.bousq...@radialpoint.com wrote: We are running CloudStack 4.1.0 installed from RPM and are having problem configuring the AWS API: CloudStack-Bridge. After doing the initial configuration (enable.ec2.api=true + restart) then following these steps: http://cloudstack.apache.org/docs/en-US/Apache_CloudStack/4.1.0/html/Insta llation_Guide/aws-ec2-user-setup.html My EC2 env. variables are the following: EC2_CERT=/root/francoisb_crt.pem EC2_HOME=/root/ec2-api-tools-1.3-62308 EC2_PRIVATE_KEY=/root/francoisb_key.pem EC2_URL=http://cloud.ops.dot:7080/awsapi We get the following error when using any of the ec2 api tools: # ./ec2-describe-availability-zones Client: The service cannot be found for the endpoint reference (EPR) http://cloud.ops.dot:7080/awsapi/services/AmazonEC2/ Server error from catalina.out is the following: Jul 30, 2013 2:42:52 PM org.apache.axis2.engine.AxisEngine receive SEVERE: The service cannot be found for the endpoint reference (EPR) http://cloud.ops.dot:7080/awsapi/services/AmazonEC2/ org.apache.axis2.AxisFault: The service cannot be found for the endpoint reference (EPR) http://cloud.ops.dot:7080/awsapi/services/AmazonEC2/ at org.apache.axis2.engine.DispatchPhase.checkPostConditions(DispatchPhase.ja va:65) at org.apache.axis2.engine.Phase.invoke(Phase.java:334) at org.apache.axis2.engine.AxisEngine.invoke(AxisEngine.java:254) at org.apache.axis2.engine.AxisEngine.receive(AxisEngine.java:160) at org.apache.axis2.transport.http.HTTPTransportUtils.processHTTPPostRequest( HTTPTransportUtils.java:173) at org.apache.axis2.transport.http.AxisServlet.doPost(AxisServlet.java:144) at javax.servlet.http.HttpServlet.service(HttpServlet.java:637) at javax.servlet.http.HttpServlet.service(HttpServlet.java:717) at org.apache.catalina.core.ApplicationFilterChain.internalDoFilter(Applicati onFilterChain.java:290) at org.apache.catalina.core.ApplicationFilterChain.doFilter(ApplicationFilter Chain.java:206) at org.apache.catalina.core.ApplicationDispatcher.invoke(ApplicationDispatche r.java:646) at org.apache.catalina.core.ApplicationDispatcher.processRequest(ApplicationD ispatcher.java:436) at org.apache.catalina.core.ApplicationDispatcher.doForward(ApplicationDispat cher.java:374) at org.apache.catalina.core.ApplicationDispatcher.forward(ApplicationDispatch er.java:302) at com.cloud.bridge.service.EC2MainServlet.doGetOrPost(EC2MainServlet.java:11 4) at com.cloud.bridge.service.EC2MainServlet.doPost(EC2MainServlet.java:89) at javax.servlet.http.HttpServlet.service(HttpServlet.java:637) at javax.servlet.http.HttpServlet.service(HttpServlet.java:717) at org.apache.catalina.core.ApplicationFilterChain.internalDoFilter(Applicati onFilterChain.java:290) at org.apache.catalina.core.ApplicationFilterChain.doFilter(ApplicationFilter Chain.java:206) at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardWrapperValve.invoke(StandardWrapperValve. java:233) at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardContextValve.invoke(StandardContextValve. java:191) at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardHostValve.invoke(StandardHostValve.java:1 27) at org.apache.catalina.valves.ErrorReportValve.invoke(ErrorReportValve.java:1 02) at org.apache.catalina.valves.AccessLogValve.invoke(AccessLogValve.java:555) at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardEngineValve.invoke(StandardEngineValve.ja va:109) at org.apache.catalina.connector.CoyoteAdapter.service(CoyoteAdapter.java:298 ) at org.apache.coyote.http11.Http11NioProcessor.process(Http11NioProcessor.jav a:889) at org.apache.coyote.http11.Http11NioProtocol$Http11ConnectionHandler.process (Http11NioProtocol.java:721) at org.apache.tomcat.util.net.NioEndpoint$SocketProcessor.run(NioEndpoint.jav a:2274) at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java: 1146) at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java :615) at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:679) I found this similar issue in the mailing history but there is no resolution. http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/cloudstack-users/201306.mbox/%3C1 711456701.20130629021...@vp.pl%3E both enable.s3.api=true and s3.enable=true are also configured but, I haven't tried them. Any idea? François Bousquet NOC Team Lead Office: 514-286-2636 #2337 Mobile: 514-654-8920 francois.bousq...@radialpoint.com *** This e-mail and attachments are confidential, legally privileged, may be subject to copyright and sent solely for the attention of the addressee(s). Any unauthorized use or
RE: external load balancer, shared network, advanced networking
I was able to get this to work by leaving the system offering set to none. Previously I was choosing 'system offering for software router'. Any idea why that is? -Original Message- From: Brian Galura [mailto:brian.gal...@citrix.com] Sent: Thursday, August 01, 2013 3:31 PM To: users@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: RE: external load balancer, shared network, advanced networking OK thanks for this info. I also am unable to get this to work with isolated networks. I created a service offering for isolated networks with source nat and load balancing enabled, and Supported Source NAT type: per account When I try and start an instance on a network created using this offering I get the following error in the logs: http://pastie.org/8198148 -Original Message- From: Sanjeev Neelarapu [mailto:sanjeev.neelar...@citrix.com] Sent: Wednesday, July 31, 2013 12:33 AM To: users@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: RE: external load balancer, shared network, advanced networking Hi Brian, In 4.1 , the configuration only works with isolated networks. From next ACS release onwards this would be supported. Thanks, Sanjeev -Original Message- From: Brian Galura [mailto:brian.gal...@citrix.com] Sent: Tuesday, July 30, 2013 11:58 PM To: users@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: external load balancer, shared network, advanced networking Im using CS4.1 and trying to get a netscaler to work as a load balancer as the subject describes. Is it true that this configuration will only work with isolated networks? Does this mean that the isolated vlans all need to be trunked up to the netscaler? Im having a hard time finding definitive documentation on this point.
Re: Update resolve.conf search string
No problem I can write a script and make sure the config is the way I want it, run it every 10 min or something to ensure the config is cool Curtis Old Neustar, Inc. / Neustarlabs / Senior Research Engineer 46000 Center Oak Plaza Sterling, VA 20166 Office: +1.571.434.5384 Mobile: +1.540.532.2230 / curtis@neustar.biz / www.neustar.biz http://www.neustar.biz/ The information contained in this e-mail message is intended only for the use of the recipient(s) named above and may contain confidential and/or privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient you have received this e-mail message in error and any review, dissemination, distribution, or copying of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately and delete the original message. On 8/1/13 6:52 PM, Chiradeep Vittal chiradeep.vit...@citrix.com wrote: Yeah you would have to use automation outside of CloudStack for this On 8/1/13 3:14 PM, Old, Curtis curtis@neustar.biz wrote: Basic, yes dnsmasq on the system vm would set that up, but how do you make it persistent? If I have to re-do the router/dns/dhcp system vm, am I always going to have to go in and edit config file? Curtis Old Neustar, Inc. / Neustarlabs / Senior Research Engineer 46000 Center Oak Plaza Sterling, VA 20166 Office: +1.571.434.5384 Mobile: +1.540.532.2230 / curtis@neustar.biz / www.neustar.biz http://www.neustar.biz/ The information contained in this e-mail message is intended only for the use of the recipient(s) named above and may contain confidential and/or privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient you have received this e-mail message in error and any review, dissemination, distribution, or copying of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately and delete the original message. On 8/1/13 5:56 PM, Chiradeep Vittal chiradeep.vit...@citrix.com wrote: Is this for Advanced or basic? I think on shared networks and basic zone, the DHCP server returns the DNS server configured for the zone. On 8/1/13 1:34 PM, Old, Curtis curtis@neustar.biz wrote: Is there way to persistently change the search entry for the /etc/resolv.conf on cloudstack clients? How do I ensure that the system router vm takes care of this? Curtis Old Neustar, Inc. / Neustarlabs / Senior Research Engineer 46000 Center Oak Plaza Sterling, VA 20166 Office: +1.571.434.5384 Mobile: +1.540.532.2230 / curtis@neustar.bizmailto:curtis@neustar.biz / www.neustar.bizhttp://www.neustar.biz/ The information contained in this e-mail message is intended only for the use of the recipient(s) named above and may contain confidential and/or privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient you have received this e-mail message in error and any review, dissemination, distribution, or copying of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately and delete the original message.
Re: Global Guest Networks
For your use case you really don't need a public network it seems. If you were re-doing your setup, assign the public network to be something else (VLAN UNUSEDXX, network UNUSED/24), and create a shared network with the cidr 192.168.0.0/24. BUT, this might not be advisable since CloudStack will create a DHCP server on this network. But you probably ALREADY have a DHCP server on this network which will respond to the CloudStack Vms instead of CloudStack's own DHCP server. On 7/30/13 8:53 AM, Christopher M. Ryan cr...@harmonia.com wrote: Thanks Murali! Your advice has helped me create shared networks but it doesn't work as I expected. When creating a VM on a shared network, it is not accessible outside of the Cloudstack Console button. How would I be able to have VMs on a shared network automatically placed on the Public network? I know this is possible on an isolated network using source/static NAT but we need the VMs to be able to communicate with each other on a network that's offered globally to all users. Here are the configurations I have: Each server has 2 nics. I have divided up communications as follows: Eth0: Public and Guest Eth1: Storage and Management Switch: VLAN 1: Public VLAN 2: Guest VLAN 3: Storage/Management - All ports thi Public (VLAN1) is UNTAGGED on the following ports: 1: the cloudstack server Public (VLAN1) is TAGGED on the following ports: 3: Host 1 5: Host 2 7: Host 3 9: Host 4 15: Link to office switch (which doesn't have any VLANs configured) Guest (VLAN2) is TAGGED on the following ports: 3: Host 1 5: Host 2 7: Host 3 9: Host 4 Storage/Management (VLAN3) is UNTAGGED on the following ports: 2: Host 1 4: Host 2 6: Host 3 8: Host 4 10: SAN 11: SAN 12: SAN 13: SAN 14: ASA The office's network is on CIDR 192.168.0.0/24. I have configured the Public network to use VLAN ID 1 and use the same CIDR as the office network (192.168.0.0/24) I can get static NAT working with isolated networks by not tagging the public VLAN on the switch and configuring the Public network to be untagged. Unfortunately it seems shared networking requires VLAN tagging so I tried tagging both the Public network and the corresponding Public VLAN on the switch with VLAN ID 1 but that didn't seem to work. I would like to have VMs within a shared network available directly through the office network (192.168.0.0/24). Anyone know how this could be accomplished? I have learned a lot about networking through using CloudStack but am definitely no network engineer. -Original Message- From: Christopher M. Ryan [mailto:cr...@harmonia.com] Sent: Tuesday, July 30, 2013 9:52 AM To: users@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: RE: Global Guest Networks Figured it out! I needed to create a Guest Network by going to Infrastructure Zones Zone Name Physical Network Guest Network Network Tab Chris Ryan Harmonia Holdings Group, LLC 404 People Place, Suite 402 Charlottesville, VA 22911 Office: (434) 244-4002 -Original Message- From: Christopher M. Ryan [mailto:cr...@harmonia.com] Sent: Tuesday, July 30, 2013 9:07 AM To: users@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: RE: Global Guest Networks I created and enabled a Network Offering with Guest Type Shared. it does not show as an option when creating a Guest Network. Only Network Offerings with Guest Type Isolated are shown. An empty list is shown when creating a new Guest Network after disabling all Network Offerings with Guest Type Isolated. I am using Advanced Networking. Chris Ryan Harmonia Holdings Group, LLC 404 People Place, Suite 402 Charlottesville, VA 22911 Office: (434) 244-4002 -Original Message- From: Murali Reddy [mailto:murali.re...@citrix.com] Sent: Thursday, July 25, 2013 10:08 AM To: users@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: Global Guest Networks On 25/07/13 6:57 PM, Christopher M. Ryan cr...@harmonia.com wrote: Hi all, Is there a way to force all users to only have the option to pick from a list of predefined guest networks instead of creating their own? These networks can be shared. We are trying to have 2 networks that a user can create a VM on and are finding it difficult to lock them into predefined networks. You could disable all network offerings with 'isolated' guest traffic type, and create shared networks and make them available to all users. Thank!
Re: CloudStack 302 to 41 XenServer Issue
Whoops, I actually replied to this twice but I sent it to myself instead of the list lol. I actually ended up fixing this: 2013-08-01 15:11:35,151 DEBUG [xen.resource.CitrixResourceBase] (AgentTaskPool-3:null) Management network is on pif=f6ca9e23-77a1-37e1-b5e8-744e7a612945 2013-08-01 15:11:35,161 WARN [xen.resource.CitrixResourceBase] (AgentTaskPool-3:null) Unable to find storage network cloud-stor1 for host 10.10.2.11 2013-08-01 15:11:35,161 WARN [xen.resource.CitrixResourceBase] (AgentTaskPool-3:null) Unable to get host information for 10.10.2.11 java.lang.IllegalArgumentException: Unable to find storage network cloud-stor1 for host 10.10.2.11 at com.cloud.hypervisor.xen.resource.CitrixResourceBase.getHostInfo(CitrixResourceBase.java:4364) at com.cloud.hypervisor.xen.resource.CitrixResourceBase.initialize(CitrixResourceBase.java:4496) at com.cloud.hypervisor.xen.resource.XenServer56Resource.initialize(XenServer56Resource.java:323) at com.cloud.resource.ResourceManagerImpl.createHostAndAgent(ResourceManagerImpl.java:1907) at com.cloud.resource.ResourceManagerImpl.createHostAndAgent(ResourceManagerImpl.java:2084) at com.cloud.agent.manager.AgentManagerImpl$SimulateStartTask.run(AgentManagerImpl.java:1156) at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1146) at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:615) at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:679) That was the error I was getting every time it tried to connect to a XenServer host. There was an entry in my host_details table called storage.network.device1and storage.network.device2 that with values of cloud-stor1 and cloud-stor2. I don't remember ever setting these networks up, and they don't actually exist on my XenServer hosts at all. I removed the entries from my database and the XenServer hosts connected just fine. This is an environment that has been running since 2.2.1 according to my version table. I am not sure that if maybe an older version of CS was creating these these storage network tags automatically? I checked another deployment that was deployed on 3.0.2 with XenServer 5.6SP2 and it did not have these entries in the database, and I've been deploying XenServer the same way for a long time with CloudStack. Was quite weird. On Aug 1, 2013, at 4:54 PM, Chiradeep Vittal chiradeep.vit...@citrix.com wrote: Logs? On 8/1/13 12:53 PM, John Skinner john.skin...@appcore.com wrote: Hello all, Just upgraded my mixed KVM/XenServer environment form 3.0.2 to 4.1. All of my KVM hosts seem happy, but all of my XenServer (5.6SP2) hosts show as disconnected and are not coming back. Has anyone experienced this?
答复: IP Address assigned by CS is not passed to new instance VM
Hi Cindy, I faced the same issue days ago, and asked in this mail thread. It seems there is CS bug in basic network. You could try with advanced network to see the bug is there or not. Thanks -Jerry -邮件原件- 发件人: Chiradeep Vittal [mailto:chiradeep.vit...@citrix.com] 发送时间: 2013年8月2日 星期五 5:51 收件人: users@cloudstack.apache.org; Soheil Eizadi 主题: Re: IP Address assigned by CS is not passed to new instance VM You cannot attach anything or use HTML on Apache mailing lists. Can you try and bring up the interface up manually ifconfig eth0 up dhclient eth0 Does the built-in template work? On 8/1/13 2:45 PM, Cindy Jiang cji...@infoblox.com wrote: Somehow I can't attach screenshots. So I copy the outputs of this CentOS instance here. As you can see, the ethernet0 interface configuration doesn't contain any ip address or default gateway information, even though Cloudstack assigns these information correctly. [root@localhost network-scripts]# ifconfig loLink encap:Local Loopback inet addr:127.0.0.1 Mask:255.0.0.0 inet6 addr: ::1/128 Scope:Host UP LOOPBACK RUNNING MTU:16436 Metric:1 RX packets:0 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0 TX packets:0 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0 collisions:0 txqueuelen:0 RX bytes:0 (0.0 b) TX bytes:0 (0.0 b) [root@localhost network-scripts]# hostname Localhost.localdomain [root@localhost network-scripts]# cat ifcfg-eth0 DEVICE=eth0 HWADDR=06:57:6E:00:00:2A NM_CONTROLLED=yes ONBOOT=no From: Cindy Jiang cji...@infoblox.commailto:cji...@infoblox.com Reply-To: users@cloudstack.apache.orgmailto:users@cloudstack.apache.org users@cloudstack.apache.orgmailto:users@cloudstack.apache.org Date: Thursday, August 1, 2013 2:34 PM To: users@cloudstack.apache.orgmailto:users@cloudstack.apache.org users@cloudstack.apache.orgmailto:users@cloudstack.apache.org, Soheil Eizadi seiz...@infoblox.commailto:seiz...@infoblox.com Subject: Re: IP Address assigned by CS is not passed to new instance VM Attach the screenshots [cid:CFDFC580-184D-4F0E-AF41-5AF18794D413][cid:7E1641EF-DEBC-4A25-90B3- 3B1 32C1A66B0] [cid:DA5AC137-FC18-4A63-9367-7583EB1A6940] From: Cindy Jiang cji...@infoblox.commailto:cji...@infoblox.com Reply-To: users@cloudstack.apache.orgmailto:users@cloudstack.apache.org users@cloudstack.apache.orgmailto:users@cloudstack.apache.org Date: Thursday, August 1, 2013 2:24 PM To: users@cloudstack.apache.orgmailto:users@cloudstack.apache.org users@cloudstack.apache.orgmailto:users@cloudstack.apache.org, Soheil Eizadi seiz...@infoblox.commailto:seiz...@infoblox.com Subject: IP Address assigned by CS is not passed to new instance VM Hello, We are trying to create a new instance with basic networking setup using CentOS 6.0 ISO. Cloudstack assigns the correct IP Address (in my case: 10.60.176.110) to this new centOS instance, but once you log into this VM, check ifconfig and /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcfg-eth0, the IP Address and default gateway information are not passed through correctly. The same issue with hostname instead of centos-107, it shows as localhost.localdomain. Please see attached screenshots. Has anyone experienced the similar issue? Our environment: 1. CS 4.2 2. XenServer 6.0.2 3. CentOS 6.0 ISO Thanks, Cindy
Re: VPC Issue with CS 4.1/KVM/Openvswitch
I can only guess this to be a bug. I'd file that and probably raise it to
critical since this seems to bet key functionality broken. Have you tried this
with Cloudstack 4.2 that's nearing release, and you might be able to get it
fixed there.
Ahmad
On Jul 23, 2013, at 10:07 AM, Dinu Arateanu dinu.arate...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
I've been testing Cloudstack 4.1 with KVM/Openvswitch networking. When trying
to add a VPC, the VR's public interface default route was not assigned
correctly, nor the source nat. Cloudstack reports the VPC is created
successfully, however the VR is left in an incomplete state. Looking
through the agent logs I found:
2013-07-19 16:39:20,961 DEBUG [cloud.agent.Agent]
(agentRequest-Handler-2:null) Processing command:
com.cloud.agent.api.PlugNicCommand
2013-07-19 16:39:20,970 DEBUG [kvm.resource.OvsVifDriver]
(agentRequest-Handler-2:null) plugging nic=[Nic:Public-192.168.1.68-vlan://32]
2013-07-19 16:39:20,970 DEBUG [kvm.resource.OvsVifDriver]
(agentRequest-Handler-2:null) creating a vlan dev and bridge for public
traffic per traffic label vswitch0
2013-07-19 16:39:21,116 DEBUG [cloud.agent.Agent]
(agentRequest-Handler-2:null) Processing command:
com.cloud.agent.api.routing.IpAssocVpcCommand
2013-07-19 16:39:21,126 DEBUG
[resource.virtualnetwork.VirtualRoutingResource]
(agentRequest-Handler-2:null) Executing:
/usr/share/cloudstack-common/scripts/network/domr/router_proxy.sh
vpc_ipassoc.sh 169.254.2.23 -A -l 192.168.1.68 -c ethnull -g 192.168.1.1 -m
24 -n 192.168.1.0
2013-07-19 16:39:29,107 DEBUG [kvm.resource.LibvirtComputingResource]
(UgentTask-5:null) Executing:
/usr/share/cloudstack-common/scripts/vm/network/security_group.py
get_rule_logs_for_vms
2013-07-19 16:39:29,233 DEBUG [kvm.resource.LibvirtComputingResource]
(UgentTask-5:null) Execution is successful.
2013-07-19 16:39:29,235 DEBUG [cloud.agent.Agent] (UgentTask-5:null) Sending
ping: Seq 7-103: { Cmd , MgmtId: -1, via: 7, Ver: v1, Flags: 11,
[{PingRoutingWithNwGroupsCommand:{newGroupStates:{},newStates:{},_gatewayAccessible:true,_vnetAccessible:true,hostType:Routing,hostId:7,wait:0}}]
}
2013-07-19 16:39:29,243 DEBUG [cloud.agent.Agent] (Agent-Handler-5:null)
Received response: Seq 7-103: { Ans: , MgmtId: 112938636298, via: 7, Ver:
v1, Flags: 100010,
[{PingAnswer:{_command:{hostType:Routing,hostId:7,wait:0},result:true,wait:0}}]
}
2013-07-19 16:39:38,707 DEBUG
[resource.virtualnetwork.VirtualRoutingResource]
(agentRequest-Handler-2:null) Execution is successful.
2013-07-19 16:39:38,708 DEBUG
[resource.virtualnetwork.VirtualRoutingResource]
(agentRequest-Handler-2:null) Device ethnull does not exist.
Cannot find device ethnull
Error: argument Table_ethnull is wrong: table value is invalid
Error: argument Table_ethnull is wrong: table value is invalid
RTNETLINK answers: No such process
2013-07-19 16:39:38,709 DEBUG [cloud.agent.Agent]
(agentRequest-Handler-2:null) Processing command:
com.cloud.agent.api.routing.SetSourceNatCommand
2013-07-19 16:39:38,719 DEBUG [kvm.resource.LibvirtComputingResource]
(agentRequest-Handler-2:null) failing to get physical interface from
bridgecloud0, did not find an eth*, bond*, or vlan* in
/sys/devices/virtual/net/cloud0/brif
2013-07-19 16:39:38,719 DEBUG [kvm.resource.LibvirtComputingResource]
(agentRequest-Handler-2:null) failed to get vlan id from bridge
cloud0attached to physical interface
2013-07-19 16:39:38,719 DEBUG [kvm.resource.LibvirtComputingResource]
(agentRequest-Handler-2:null) failing to get physical interface from
bridgevswitch0, did not find an eth*, bond*, or vlan* in
/sys/devices/virtual/net/vswitch0/brif
2013-07-19 16:39:38,719 DEBUG [kvm.resource.LibvirtComputingResource]
(agentRequest-Handler-2:null) failed to get vlan id from bridge
vswitch0attached to physical interface
2013-07-19 16:39:38,719 DEBUG
[resource.virtualnetwork.VirtualRoutingResource]
(agentRequest-Handler-2:null) Executing:
/usr/share/cloudstack-common/scripts/network/domr/router_proxy.sh vpc_snat.sh
169.254.2.23 -A -l 192.168.1.68 -c eth2
2013-07-19 16:39:38,947 DEBUG
[resource.virtualnetwork.VirtualRoutingResource]
(agentRequest-Handler-2:null) Execution is successful.
2013-07-19 16:39:38,948 DEBUG
[resource.virtualnetwork.VirtualRoutingResource]
(agentRequest-Handler-2:null) iptables: Bad rule (does a matching rule exist
in that chain?).
iptables: No chain/target/match by that name.
Cloudstack is configured with advanced networking. Tags for physical networks
- vswitch0 for public guest traffic
- vif9 for storage traffic
- vif8 for management traffic
Openvswitch configuration:
# ovs-vsctl show
Bridge vswitch1
Port vswitch1
Interface vswitch1
type: internal
Port eth1
Interface eth1
Port vif9
tag: 9
Interface vif9
type: internal
Re: 答复: IP Address assigned by CS is not passed to new instance VM
Have you tried to bring-up eht0 and restart the network service? Just try: ifconfig eth0 up; service network restart; On 2013年08月02日 09:51, Jerry Jiang wrote: Hi Cindy, I faced the same issue days ago, and asked in this mail thread. It seems there is CS bug in basic network. You could try with advanced network to see the bug is there or not. Thanks -Jerry -邮件原件- 发件人: Chiradeep Vittal [mailto:chiradeep.vit...@citrix.com] 发送时间: 2013年8月2日 星期五 5:51 收件人: users@cloudstack.apache.org; Soheil Eizadi 主题: Re: IP Address assigned by CS is not passed to new instance VM You cannot attach anything or use HTML on Apache mailing lists. Can you try and bring up the interface up manually ifconfig eth0 up dhclient eth0 Does the built-in template work? On 8/1/13 2:45 PM, Cindy Jiang cji...@infoblox.com wrote: Somehow I can't attach screenshots. So I copy the outputs of this CentOS instance here. As you can see, the ethernet0 interface configuration doesn't contain any ip address or default gateway information, even though Cloudstack assigns these information correctly. [root@localhost network-scripts]# ifconfig loLink encap:Local Loopback inet addr:127.0.0.1 Mask:255.0.0.0 inet6 addr: ::1/128 Scope:Host UP LOOPBACK RUNNING MTU:16436 Metric:1 RX packets:0 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0 TX packets:0 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0 collisions:0 txqueuelen:0 RX bytes:0 (0.0 b) TX bytes:0 (0.0 b) [root@localhost network-scripts]# hostname Localhost.localdomain [root@localhost network-scripts]# cat ifcfg-eth0 DEVICE=eth0 HWADDR=06:57:6E:00:00:2A NM_CONTROLLED=yes ONBOOT=no From: Cindy Jiang cji...@infoblox.commailto:cji...@infoblox.com Reply-To: users@cloudstack.apache.orgmailto:users@cloudstack.apache.org users@cloudstack.apache.orgmailto:users@cloudstack.apache.org Date: Thursday, August 1, 2013 2:34 PM To: users@cloudstack.apache.orgmailto:users@cloudstack.apache.org users@cloudstack.apache.orgmailto:users@cloudstack.apache.org, Soheil Eizadi seiz...@infoblox.commailto:seiz...@infoblox.com Subject: Re: IP Address assigned by CS is not passed to new instance VM Attach the screenshots [cid:CFDFC580-184D-4F0E-AF41-5AF18794D413][cid:7E1641EF-DEBC-4A25-90B3- 3B1 32C1A66B0] [cid:DA5AC137-FC18-4A63-9367-7583EB1A6940] From: Cindy Jiang cji...@infoblox.commailto:cji...@infoblox.com Reply-To: users@cloudstack.apache.orgmailto:users@cloudstack.apache.org users@cloudstack.apache.orgmailto:users@cloudstack.apache.org Date: Thursday, August 1, 2013 2:24 PM To: users@cloudstack.apache.orgmailto:users@cloudstack.apache.org users@cloudstack.apache.orgmailto:users@cloudstack.apache.org, Soheil Eizadi seiz...@infoblox.commailto:seiz...@infoblox.com Subject: IP Address assigned by CS is not passed to new instance VM Hello, We are trying to create a new instance with basic networking setup using CentOS 6.0 ISO. Cloudstack assigns the correct IP Address (in my case: 10.60.176.110) to this new centOS instance, but once you log into this VM, check ifconfig and /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcfg-eth0, the IP Address and default gateway information are not passed through correctly. The same issue with hostname instead of centos-107, it shows as localhost.localdomain. Please see attached screenshots. Has anyone experienced the similar issue? Our environment: 1. CS 4.2 2. XenServer 6.0.2 3. CentOS 6.0 ISO Thanks, Cindy
Re: 答复: IP Address assigned by CS is not passed to new instance VM
Hi, Even I have the same issue. Doing as suggested below only helps sometimes. But this method doesn't help while automating VM creation and running scripts after the VM is launched. Thanks Sriharsha Sent from my iPhone On Aug 1, 2013, at 20:08, Yan Ke yan...@yonyou.com wrote: Have you tried to bring-up eht0 and restart the network service? Just try: ifconfig eth0 up; service network restart; On 2013年08月02日 09:51, Jerry Jiang wrote: Hi Cindy, I faced the same issue days ago, and asked in this mail thread. It seems there is CS bug in basic network. You could try with advanced network to see the bug is there or not. Thanks -Jerry -邮件原件- 发件人: Chiradeep Vittal [mailto:chiradeep.vit...@citrix.com] 发送时间: 2013年8月2日 星期五 5:51 收件人: users@cloudstack.apache.org; Soheil Eizadi 主题: Re: IP Address assigned by CS is not passed to new instance VM You cannot attach anything or use HTML on Apache mailing lists. Can you try and bring up the interface up manually ifconfig eth0 up dhclient eth0 Does the built-in template work? On 8/1/13 2:45 PM, Cindy Jiang cji...@infoblox.com wrote: Somehow I can't attach screenshots. So I copy the outputs of this CentOS instance here. As you can see, the ethernet0 interface configuration doesn't contain any ip address or default gateway information, even though Cloudstack assigns these information correctly. [root@localhost network-scripts]# ifconfig loLink encap:Local Loopback inet addr:127.0.0.1 Mask:255.0.0.0 inet6 addr: ::1/128 Scope:Host UP LOOPBACK RUNNING MTU:16436 Metric:1 RX packets:0 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0 TX packets:0 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0 collisions:0 txqueuelen:0 RX bytes:0 (0.0 b) TX bytes:0 (0.0 b) [root@localhost network-scripts]# hostname Localhost.localdomain [root@localhost network-scripts]# cat ifcfg-eth0 DEVICE=eth0 HWADDR=06:57:6E:00:00:2A NM_CONTROLLED=yes ONBOOT=no From: Cindy Jiang cji...@infoblox.commailto:cji...@infoblox.com Reply-To: users@cloudstack.apache.orgmailto:users@cloudstack.apache.org users@cloudstack.apache.orgmailto:users@cloudstack.apache.org Date: Thursday, August 1, 2013 2:34 PM To: users@cloudstack.apache.orgmailto:users@cloudstack.apache.org users@cloudstack.apache.orgmailto:users@cloudstack.apache.org, Soheil Eizadi seiz...@infoblox.commailto:seiz...@infoblox.com Subject: Re: IP Address assigned by CS is not passed to new instance VM Attach the screenshots [cid:CFDFC580-184D-4F0E-AF41-5AF18794D413][cid:7E1641EF-DEBC-4A25-90B3- 3B1 32C1A66B0] [cid:DA5AC137-FC18-4A63-9367-7583EB1A6940] From: Cindy Jiang cji...@infoblox.commailto:cji...@infoblox.com Reply-To: users@cloudstack.apache.orgmailto:users@cloudstack.apache.org users@cloudstack.apache.orgmailto:users@cloudstack.apache.org Date: Thursday, August 1, 2013 2:24 PM To: users@cloudstack.apache.orgmailto:users@cloudstack.apache.org users@cloudstack.apache.orgmailto:users@cloudstack.apache.org, Soheil Eizadi seiz...@infoblox.commailto:seiz...@infoblox.com Subject: IP Address assigned by CS is not passed to new instance VM Hello, We are trying to create a new instance with basic networking setup using CentOS 6.0 ISO. Cloudstack assigns the correct IP Address (in my case: 10.60.176.110) to this new centOS instance, but once you log into this VM, check ifconfig and /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcfg-eth0, the IP Address and default gateway information are not passed through correctly. The same issue with hostname instead of centos-107, it shows as localhost.localdomain. Please see attached screenshots. Has anyone experienced the similar issue? Our environment: 1. CS 4.2 2. XenServer 6.0.2 3. CentOS 6.0 ISO Thanks, Cindy
How to limit network's throughput?
Hi,all: I tried to limit VMs' network throughput but failed to do so.I first set the global setting of vm.network.throttling.rate to 8 (it means 8 Mb/s, 1MB/s )and restarted management-server, then created an service offering in which the Network-Rate option was limited to 1MB.Finally I started a new VM.However, the settings seemed not work because the VM's network throughput was able to reach to 11MB/s which is the maximum value of my switch. I'm working with CS4.1,CentOS6.4, and using KVM as the hypervisor.All the machines including VMs are located on a single subnet of 192.168.1.0/24.
Re: 答复: IP Address assigned by CS is not passed to new instance VM
Hi Sriharsha, Can you check the following on your router? 1. When you start the VM. Do you see the VM's MAC, IP info being recorded in /etc/dhcphosts.txt file on your router VM? 2. Also please make sure that /etc/dnsmasq.conf on your router contains the following lines Dhcp-range=IP From your guest subnet/router's guest IP,static Few other checks might help you here: On your Guest VM, (I) Are you sure that eth0 is what your current interface active? Please check ifconfig -a or dmesg to see what eth interfaces are created by system. (II) If it is something else other than eth0, can you try dhclient ethX and see whether that works or not? Thanks, SWAMY On 02/08/13 9:10 AM, sriharsha work sriharsha.w...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, Even I have the same issue. Doing as suggested below only helps sometimes. But this method doesn't help while automating VM creation and running scripts after the VM is launched. Thanks Sriharsha Sent from my iPhone On Aug 1, 2013, at 20:08, Yan Ke yan...@yonyou.com wrote: Have you tried to bring-up eht0 and restart the network service? Just try: ifconfig eth0 up; service network restart; On 2013年08月02日 09:51, Jerry Jiang wrote: Hi Cindy, I faced the same issue days ago, and asked in this mail thread. It seems there is CS bug in basic network. You could try with advanced network to see the bug is there or not. Thanks -Jerry -邮件原件- 发件人: Chiradeep Vittal [mailto:chiradeep.vit...@citrix.com] 发送时间: 2013年8月2日 星期五 5:51 收件人: users@cloudstack.apache.org; Soheil Eizadi 主题: Re: IP Address assigned by CS is not passed to new instance VM You cannot attach anything or use HTML on Apache mailing lists. Can you try and bring up the interface up manually ifconfig eth0 up dhclient eth0 Does the built-in template work? On 8/1/13 2:45 PM, Cindy Jiang cji...@infoblox.com wrote: Somehow I can't attach screenshots. So I copy the outputs of this CentOS instance here. As you can see, the ethernet0 interface configuration doesn't contain any ip address or default gateway information, even though Cloudstack assigns these information correctly. [root@localhost network-scripts]# ifconfig loLink encap:Local Loopback inet addr:127.0.0.1 Mask:255.0.0.0 inet6 addr: ::1/128 Scope:Host UP LOOPBACK RUNNING MTU:16436 Metric:1 RX packets:0 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0 TX packets:0 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0 collisions:0 txqueuelen:0 RX bytes:0 (0.0 b) TX bytes:0 (0.0 b) [root@localhost network-scripts]# hostname Localhost.localdomain [root@localhost network-scripts]# cat ifcfg-eth0 DEVICE=eth0 HWADDR=06:57:6E:00:00:2A NM_CONTROLLED=yes ONBOOT=no From: Cindy Jiang cji...@infoblox.commailto:cji...@infoblox.com Reply-To: users@cloudstack.apache.orgmailto:users@cloudstack.apache.org users@cloudstack.apache.orgmailto:users@cloudstack.apache.org Date: Thursday, August 1, 2013 2:34 PM To: users@cloudstack.apache.orgmailto:users@cloudstack.apache.org users@cloudstack.apache.orgmailto:users@cloudstack.apache.org, Soheil Eizadi seiz...@infoblox.commailto:seiz...@infoblox.com Subject: Re: IP Address assigned by CS is not passed to new instance VM Attach the screenshots [cid:CFDFC580-184D-4F0E-AF41-5AF18794D413][cid:7E1641EF-DEBC-4A25-90B3- 3B1 32C1A66B0] [cid:DA5AC137-FC18-4A63-9367-7583EB1A6940] From: Cindy Jiang cji...@infoblox.commailto:cji...@infoblox.com Reply-To: users@cloudstack.apache.orgmailto:users@cloudstack.apache.org users@cloudstack.apache.orgmailto:users@cloudstack.apache.org Date: Thursday, August 1, 2013 2:24 PM To: users@cloudstack.apache.orgmailto:users@cloudstack.apache.org users@cloudstack.apache.orgmailto:users@cloudstack.apache.org, Soheil Eizadi seiz...@infoblox.commailto:seiz...@infoblox.com Subject: IP Address assigned by CS is not passed to new instance VM Hello, We are trying to create a new instance with basic networking setup using CentOS 6.0 ISO. Cloudstack assigns the correct IP Address (in my case: 10.60.176.110) to this new centOS instance, but once you log into this VM, check ifconfig and /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcfg-eth0, the IP Address and default gateway information are not passed through correctly. The same issue with hostname instead of centos-107, it shows as localhost.localdomain. Please see attached screenshots. Has anyone experienced the similar issue? Our environment: 1. CS 4.2 2. XenServer 6.0.2 3. CentOS 6.0 ISO Thanks, Cindy
Re: How to limit network's throughput?
What is the hypervisor you are using? Do you see that the hypervisor has set the right value for the Guest NIC? Thanks, SWAMY On 02/08/13 9:49 AM, Tao Lin linba...@gmail.com wrote: Hi,all: I tried to limit VMs' network throughput but failed to do so.I first set the global setting of vm.network.throttling.rate to 8 (it means 8 Mb/s, 1MB/s )and restarted management-server, then created an service offering in which the Network-Rate option was limited to 1MB.Finally I started a new VM.However, the settings seemed not work because the VM's network throughput was able to reach to 11MB/s which is the maximum value of my switch. I'm working with CS4.1,CentOS6.4, and using KVM as the hypervisor.All the machines including VMs are located on a single subnet of 192.168.1.0/24.
[Doc] Non Contiguous VLAN Ranges for Review
Hi, Non Contiguous VLAN Ranges documentation is ready for review. The doc is attached at https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-804. Please see section 11.9.2. Non Contiguous VLAN Ranges (88), and provide your feedback. Regards -Radhika
Re: 答复: IP Address assigned by CS is not passed to new instance VM
Hi Swamy, Thanks for the reply. I will check on this tomorrow. Can you please tell me the guidelines for making a template out of a vm. What configuration changes do we need to make on the vm used for creating a template. I also had an extension to this issue. Cloudstack assigns 172.18.145.15 to my guest vm, but when I looked into the Vm using console and ifconfig returns 172.18.145.70. Hence I couldn't ssh to the vm. My concern here is about the discrepancy observed with the ipaddresses. Thanks Sriharsha. Sent from my iPhone On Aug 1, 2013, at 21:29, Venkata SwamyBabu Budumuru venkataswamybabu.budum...@citrix.com wrote: Hi Sriharsha, Can you check the following on your router? 1. When you start the VM. Do you see the VM's MAC, IP info being recorded in /etc/dhcphosts.txt file on your router VM? 2. Also please make sure that /etc/dnsmasq.conf on your router contains the following lines Dhcp-range=IP From your guest subnet/router's guest IP,static Few other checks might help you here: On your Guest VM, (I) Are you sure that eth0 is what your current interface active? Please check ifconfig -a or dmesg to see what eth interfaces are created by system. (II) If it is something else other than eth0, can you try dhclient ethX and see whether that works or not? Thanks, SWAMY On 02/08/13 9:10 AM, sriharsha work sriharsha.w...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, Even I have the same issue. Doing as suggested below only helps sometimes. But this method doesn't help while automating VM creation and running scripts after the VM is launched. Thanks Sriharsha Sent from my iPhone On Aug 1, 2013, at 20:08, Yan Ke yan...@yonyou.com wrote: Have you tried to bring-up eht0 and restart the network service? Just try: ifconfig eth0 up; service network restart; On 2013年08月02日 09:51, Jerry Jiang wrote: Hi Cindy, I faced the same issue days ago, and asked in this mail thread. It seems there is CS bug in basic network. You could try with advanced network to see the bug is there or not. Thanks -Jerry -邮件原件- 发件人: Chiradeep Vittal [mailto:chiradeep.vit...@citrix.com] 发送时间: 2013年8月2日 星期五 5:51 收件人: users@cloudstack.apache.org; Soheil Eizadi 主题: Re: IP Address assigned by CS is not passed to new instance VM You cannot attach anything or use HTML on Apache mailing lists. Can you try and bring up the interface up manually ifconfig eth0 up dhclient eth0 Does the built-in template work? On 8/1/13 2:45 PM, Cindy Jiang cji...@infoblox.com wrote: Somehow I can't attach screenshots. So I copy the outputs of this CentOS instance here. As you can see, the ethernet0 interface configuration doesn't contain any ip address or default gateway information, even though Cloudstack assigns these information correctly. [root@localhost network-scripts]# ifconfig loLink encap:Local Loopback inet addr:127.0.0.1 Mask:255.0.0.0 inet6 addr: ::1/128 Scope:Host UP LOOPBACK RUNNING MTU:16436 Metric:1 RX packets:0 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0 TX packets:0 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0 collisions:0 txqueuelen:0 RX bytes:0 (0.0 b) TX bytes:0 (0.0 b) [root@localhost network-scripts]# hostname Localhost.localdomain [root@localhost network-scripts]# cat ifcfg-eth0 DEVICE=eth0 HWADDR=06:57:6E:00:00:2A NM_CONTROLLED=yes ONBOOT=no From: Cindy Jiang cji...@infoblox.commailto:cji...@infoblox.com Reply-To: users@cloudstack.apache.orgmailto:users@cloudstack.apache.org users@cloudstack.apache.orgmailto:users@cloudstack.apache.org Date: Thursday, August 1, 2013 2:34 PM To: users@cloudstack.apache.orgmailto:users@cloudstack.apache.org users@cloudstack.apache.orgmailto:users@cloudstack.apache.org, Soheil Eizadi seiz...@infoblox.commailto:seiz...@infoblox.com Subject: Re: IP Address assigned by CS is not passed to new instance VM Attach the screenshots [cid:CFDFC580-184D-4F0E-AF41-5AF18794D413][cid:7E1641EF-DEBC-4A25-90B3- 3B1 32C1A66B0] [cid:DA5AC137-FC18-4A63-9367-7583EB1A6940] From: Cindy Jiang cji...@infoblox.commailto:cji...@infoblox.com Reply-To: users@cloudstack.apache.orgmailto:users@cloudstack.apache.org users@cloudstack.apache.orgmailto:users@cloudstack.apache.org Date: Thursday, August 1, 2013 2:24 PM To: users@cloudstack.apache.orgmailto:users@cloudstack.apache.org users@cloudstack.apache.orgmailto:users@cloudstack.apache.org, Soheil Eizadi seiz...@infoblox.commailto:seiz...@infoblox.com Subject: IP Address assigned by CS is not passed to new instance VM Hello, We are trying to create a new instance with basic networking setup using CentOS 6.0 ISO. Cloudstack assigns the correct IP Address (in my case: 10.60.176.110) to this new centOS instance, but once you log into this VM, check ifconfig and /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcfg-eth0, the IP Address and default gateway information are not passed through correctly. The same issue with hostname instead of
答复: 答复: IP Address assigned by CS is not passed to new instance VM
For me, this only occurs after a refresh CentOS 6.4 guest installation. And I think it's due to CentOS not enabling eht0 by default. If you're facing the same problem as I mentioned above, just edit the '/etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcfg-eth0', specify the 'onboot' properties' value as yes. -邮件原件- 发件人: users-return-8747-yanke1=yonyou@cloudstack.apache.org [mailto:users-return-8747-yanke1=yonyou@cloudstack.apache.org] 代表 sriharsha work 发送时间: 2013年8月2日 11:41 收件人: users@cloudstack.apache.org 主题: Re: 答复: IP Address assigned by CS is not passed to new instance VM Hi, Even I have the same issue. Doing as suggested below only helps sometimes. But this method doesn't help while automating VM creation and running scripts after the VM is launched. Thanks Sriharsha Sent from my iPhone On Aug 1, 2013, at 20:08, Yan Ke yan...@yonyou.com wrote: Have you tried to bring-up eht0 and restart the network service? Just try: ifconfig eth0 up; service network restart; On 2013年08月02日 09:51, Jerry Jiang wrote: Hi Cindy, I faced the same issue days ago, and asked in this mail thread. It seems there is CS bug in basic network. You could try with advanced network to see the bug is there or not. Thanks -Jerry -邮件原件- 发件人: Chiradeep Vittal [mailto:chiradeep.vit...@citrix.com] 发送时间: 2013年8月2日 星期五 5:51 收件人: users@cloudstack.apache.org; Soheil Eizadi 主题: Re: IP Address assigned by CS is not passed to new instance VM You cannot attach anything or use HTML on Apache mailing lists. Can you try and bring up the interface up manually ifconfig eth0 up dhclient eth0 Does the built-in template work? On 8/1/13 2:45 PM, Cindy Jiang cji...@infoblox.com wrote: Somehow I can't attach screenshots. So I copy the outputs of this CentOS instance here. As you can see, the ethernet0 interface configuration doesn't contain any ip address or default gateway information, even though Cloudstack assigns these information correctly. [root@localhost network-scripts]# ifconfig loLink encap:Local Loopback inet addr:127.0.0.1 Mask:255.0.0.0 inet6 addr: ::1/128 Scope:Host UP LOOPBACK RUNNING MTU:16436 Metric:1 RX packets:0 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0 TX packets:0 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0 collisions:0 txqueuelen:0 RX bytes:0 (0.0 b) TX bytes:0 (0.0 b) [root@localhost network-scripts]# hostname Localhost.localdomain [root@localhost network-scripts]# cat ifcfg-eth0 DEVICE=eth0 HWADDR=06:57:6E:00:00:2A NM_CONTROLLED=yes ONBOOT=no From: Cindy Jiang cji...@infoblox.commailto:cji...@infoblox.com Reply-To: users@cloudstack.apache.orgmailto:users@cloudstack.apache.org users@cloudstack.apache.orgmailto:users@cloudstack.apache.org Date: Thursday, August 1, 2013 2:34 PM To: users@cloudstack.apache.orgmailto:users@cloudstack.apache.org users@cloudstack.apache.orgmailto:users@cloudstack.apache.org, Soheil Eizadi seiz...@infoblox.commailto:seiz...@infoblox.com Subject: Re: IP Address assigned by CS is not passed to new instance VM Attach the screenshots [cid:CFDFC580-184D-4F0E-AF41-5AF18794D413][cid:7E1641EF-DEBC-4A25-90 B3- 3B1 32C1A66B0] [cid:DA5AC137-FC18-4A63-9367-7583EB1A6940] From: Cindy Jiang cji...@infoblox.commailto:cji...@infoblox.com Reply-To: users@cloudstack.apache.orgmailto:users@cloudstack.apache.org users@cloudstack.apache.orgmailto:users@cloudstack.apache.org Date: Thursday, August 1, 2013 2:24 PM To: users@cloudstack.apache.orgmailto:users@cloudstack.apache.org users@cloudstack.apache.orgmailto:users@cloudstack.apache.org, Soheil Eizadi seiz...@infoblox.commailto:seiz...@infoblox.com Subject: IP Address assigned by CS is not passed to new instance VM Hello, We are trying to create a new instance with basic networking setup using CentOS 6.0 ISO. Cloudstack assigns the correct IP Address (in my case: 10.60.176.110) to this new centOS instance, but once you log into this VM, check ifconfig and /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcfg-eth0, the IP Address and default gateway information are not passed through correctly. The same issue with hostname instead of centos-107, it shows as localhost.localdomain. Please see attached screenshots. Has anyone experienced the similar issue? Our environment: 1. CS 4.2 2. XenServer 6.0.2 3. CentOS 6.0 ISO Thanks, Cindy
