Regarding 'secstorage.session.max ' and Worker threads
Hello All, I wanted to know about Worker threads in SSVM and 'secstorage.session.max' 1. In SSVM, worker threads are responsible for handling the tasks performed on SSVM. 2. 'secstorage.session.max' is the limit on max number of command execution sessions that a SSVM can handle. Does this mean that secstorage.session.max keeps limit on worker threads? I wanted to how exactly they are related. Thank you. Regards, Ravi
Re: Regarding 'secstorage.session.max ' and Worker threads
Hi Ravi, On 05-Sep-2014, at 8:07 am, Ravi K cloud.fanati...@gmail.com wrote: I wanted to know about Worker threads in SSVM and 'secstorage.session.max' 1. In SSVM, worker threads are responsible for handling the tasks performed on SSVM. Yes. secstorage.capacity.standby is a config which is the minimal number of command execution sessions that system is able to serve immediately. secstorage.session.max is another config which is the max number of command execution sessions that a SSVM can handle. 2. 'secstorage.session.max' is the limit on max number of command execution sessions that a SSVM can handle. Does this mean that secstorage.session.max keeps limit on worker threads? Yes, there is an algorithm that determines if we need more secondary storage systemvms to scale up, if we’re not able to satisfy required number of commands by these agents running in SSVM. One way to scale up is also to change the SSVM offering by creating a new offering and setting it on secstorage.service.offering. You may read about the algorithm here: http://support.citrix.com/article/CTX137928 Hope this answers your question. Regards, Rohit Yadav Software Architect, ShapeBlue M. +41 779015219 | rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com Blog: bhaisaab.org | Twitter: @_bhaisaab Find out more about ShapeBlue and our range of CloudStack related services IaaS Cloud Design Buildhttp://shapeblue.com/iaas-cloud-design-and-build// CSForge – rapid IaaS deployment frameworkhttp://shapeblue.com/csforge/ CloudStack Consultinghttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-consultancy/ CloudStack Infrastructure Supporthttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-infrastructure-support/ CloudStack Bootcamp Training Courseshttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/ This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any views or opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Shape Blue Ltd or related companies. If you are not the intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any action based upon its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please contact the sender if you believe you have received this email in error. Shape Blue Ltd is a company incorporated in England Wales. ShapeBlue Services India LLP is a company incorporated in India and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. Shape Blue Brasil Consultoria Ltda is a company incorporated in Brasil and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue SA Pty Ltd is a company registered by The Republic of South Africa and is traded under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue is a registered trademark.
RE: Regarding 'secstorage.session.max ' and Worker threads
For worker related thread pool in SSVM agent check https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Agent+related+thread+pools -Original Message- From: Ravi K [mailto:cloud.fanati...@gmail.com] Sent: Friday, 5 September 2014 11:38 AM To: users@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Regarding 'secstorage.session.max ' and Worker threads Hello All, I wanted to know about Worker threads in SSVM and 'secstorage.session.max' 1. In SSVM, worker threads are responsible for handling the tasks performed on SSVM. 2. 'secstorage.session.max' is the limit on max number of command execution sessions that a SSVM can handle. Does this mean that secstorage.session.max keeps limit on worker threads? I wanted to how exactly they are related. Thank you. Regards, Ravi
Netscaler VPC and multiple inter tiers LB
Hello Folks, I'm testing Netscaler VPX with acs 4.3. I have several VPCs deployed into my cloud. I would like to get my netscaler working with my vpcs. So from what i have tested, it seems that : - i can't share a VPX with more than one VPC ? - in order to get my netscaler working with my vpc, i need to declare it dedicated. So it can't be used both with vpc tiers and isolated networks ? - i can use netscaler with a vpc only with public tier (means external tier) Can you confirm these limitations, or is it due to a misconfiguration of my own networks offerings ? So another question is : How can i achieve ns-lb with several tiers in a vpc ? I have a vpc with web-tier, app-tier and sql-tier : how can i have in the same time, nslb between outside and web-tier, nslb between web-tier and app-tier and nslb between app-tier and sql-tier, having only one VPX ? Thanks four your lights. Regards, Benoit.
Not seeing parallel power on events in vCenter
Hi All, I'm using Cloudstack 4.1.1 against vCenter 5. If I create 5 instances on cloudstack. I see the 5 disks get created in parallel but the power up and power down events do not. Is this expected functionality? Or should power up and power down events occur at the same time? If so is there some configuration around this? If I go into vCenter I can manually power up and power down machines in parallel without issue. Thanks, Ian
NAT problem, VMs like VR can't connect to internet
Hi there, i have a problem with my cloudstack/network setup. I hope somebody can help me. I’m using KVM and on all server is CentOS 6 installed. I have no errors in the logs and all instances are running. Here my current network setup: https://www.dropbox.com/s/nzfiy1ilebugi0k/cloud_network.png?dl=0 https://www.dropbox.com/s/nzfiy1ilebugi0k/cloud_network.png?dl=0 I have a cloudstack advanced network and my virtual servers like the VR can’t connect to the internet or even ping the gateway. I also can’t ping the VR from the public network. The nodes on which the vms are running are able to ping the public network/internet. I have only one gateway, so i created a nat on the management server. So the VM that want connect to my public network must go through an other subnet first. I think my problem have something to do with my iptables (nat) settings. For a better understanding please see my diagram. Does somebody have an idea? I appreciate every advice. If this can not work, what alternatives do i have to create an advanced network with only 1 gateway? Please find below my iptables settings: IPtables of the management server: # Generated by iptables-save v1.4.7 *nat :PREROUTING ACCEPT [1158:172626] :POSTROUTING ACCEPT [119:8872] :OUTPUT ACCEPT [119:8872] -A POSTROUTING -o eth0 -j MASQUERADE # -A POSTROUTING -s 192.168.1.0.0/24 -o eth0 -j MASQUERADE COMMIT # Completed # Generated by iptables-save v1.4.7 *filter :INPUT ACCEPT [119736:288057978] :FORWARD DROP [0:0] :OUTPUT ACCEPT [145743:303840575] -A INPUT -p tcp -m tcp --dport 9090 -j ACCEPT -A INPUT -p tcp -m tcp --dport 8250 -j ACCEPT -A INPUT -p tcp -m tcp --dport 7080 -j ACCEPT -A INPUT -p tcp -m tcp --dport 8080 -j ACCEPT -A INPUT -p tcp -m tcp --dport 3306 -j ACCEPT -A INPUT -s 192.168.1.0/24 -p udp -m state --state NEW -m udp --dport 111 -j ACCEPT -A INPUT -s 192.168.1.0/24 -p tcp -m state --state NEW -m tcp --dport 111 -j ACCEPT -A INPUT -s 192.168.1.0/24 -p tcp -m state --state NEW -m tcp --dport 2049 -j ACCEPT -A INPUT -s 192.168.1.0/24 -p tcp -m state --state NEW -m tcp --dport 32803 -j ACCEPT -A INPUT -s 192.168.1.0/24 -p udp -m state --state NEW -m udp --dport 32769 -j ACCEPT -A INPUT -s 192.168.1.0/24 -p tcp -m state --state NEW -m tcp --dport 892 -j ACCEPT -A INPUT -s 192.168.1.0/24 -p udp -m state --state NEW -m udp --dport 892 -j ACCEPT -A INPUT -s 192.168.1.0/24 -p tcp -m state --state NEW -m tcp --dport 875 -j ACCEPT -A INPUT -s 192.168.1.0/24 -p udp -m state --state NEW -m udp --dport 875 -j ACCEPT -A INPUT -s 192.168.1.0/24 -p tcp -m state --state NEW -m tcp --dport 662 -j ACCEPT -A INPUT -s 192.168.1.0/24 -p udp -m state --state NEW -m udp --dport 662 -j ACCEPT -A FORWARD -i eth0 -o eth1 -m state --state RELATED,ESTABLISHED -j ACCEPT -A FORWARD -i eth1 -o eth0 -j ACCEPT COMMIT # Completed IPtables of the nodes: # Generated by iptables-save v1.4.7 *nat :PREROUTING ACCEPT [0:0] :POSTROUTING ACCEPT [0:0] :OUTPUT ACCEPT [0:0] COMMIT # Completed on Tue Mar 25 14:45:02 2014 # Generated by iptables-save v1.4.7 *mangle :PREROUTING ACCEPT [0:0] :INPUT ACCEPT [0:0] :FORWARD ACCEPT [0:0] :OUTPUT ACCEPT [0:0] :POSTROUTING ACCEPT [0:0] -A POSTROUTING -o virbr0 -p udp -m udp --dport 68 -j CHECKSUM --checksum-fill COMMIT # Completed # Generated by iptables-save v1.4.7 *filter :INPUT ACCEPT [0:0] :FORWARD ACCEPT [0:0] :OUTPUT ACCEPT [0:0] -A INPUT -i virbr0 -p udp -m udp --dport 67 -j ACCEPT -A INPUT -i virbr0 -p tcp -m tcp --dport 67 -j ACCEPT -A INPUT -i virbr0 -p tcp -m tcp --dport 67 -j ACCEPT -A INPUT -i virbr0 -p udp -m udp --dport 53 -j ACCEPT -A INPUT -i virbr0 -p tcp -m tcp --dport 53 -j ACCEPT -A INPUT -p tcp -m tcp --dport 49152:49216 -j ACCEPT -A INPUT -i virbr0 -p udp -m udp --dport 67 -j ACCEPT -A INPUT -i virbr0 -p tcp -m tcp --dport 67 -j ACCEPT -A INPUT -p tcp -m tcp --dport 5900:6100 -j ACCEPT -A INPUT -p tcp -m tcp --dport 16509 -j ACCEPT -A INPUT -m state --state RELATED,ESTABLISHED -j ACCEPT -A INPUT -p icmp -j ACCEPT -A INPUT -i lo -j ACCEPT -A INPUT -p tcp -m state --state NEW -m tcp --dport 22 -j ACCEPT -A INPUT -s 192.168.1.0/24 -p udp -m state --state NEW -m udp --dport 111 -j ACCEPT -A INPUT -s 192.168.1.0/24 -p tcp -m state --state NEW -m tcp --dport 111 -j ACCEPT -A INPUT -s 192.168.1.0/24 -p tcp -m state --state NEW -m tcp --dport 2049 -j ACCEPT -A INPUT -s 192.168.1.0/24 -p tcp -m state --state NEW -m tcp --dport 32803 -j ACCEPT -A INPUT -s 192.168.1.0/24 -p udp -m state --state NEW -m udp --dport 32769 -j ACCEPT -A INPUT -s 192.168.1.0/24 -p tcp -m state --state NEW -m tcp --dport 892 -j ACCEPT -A INPUT -s 192.168.1.0/24 -p udp -m state --state NEW -m udp --dport 892 -j ACCEPT -A INPUT -s 192.168.1.0/24 -p tcp -m state --state NEW -m tcp --dport 875 -j ACCEPT -A INPUT -s 192.168.1.0/24 -p udp -m state --state NEW -m udp --dport 875 -j ACCEPT -A INPUT -s 192.168.1.0/24 -p tcp -m state --state NEW -m tcp --dport 662 -j ACCEPT -A INPUT -s 192.168.1.0/24 -p udp -m state --state NEW
Re: Netscaler VPC and multiple inter tiers LB
Hi Benoit, The limitations that you describes are exactly what the implementation is. Dedicated VPX per VPC, only public LB for one tier. However, there is a reasoning behind this. Since users can control their tier subnets, you may have overlapping. That's why you can't have a shared NetScaler for the VPCs. You can't do inter-tier load balancing using the NetScaler if you have it inside CloudStack. To be honest, we also feel this is a huge problem, and we will likely look at our options. You need to use the Internal LB for that piece. Hope it helps/confirms your thoughts :) Francois On 2014-09-05, 6:03 AM, benoit lair wrote: Hello Folks, I'm testing Netscaler VPX with acs 4.3. I have several VPCs deployed into my cloud. I would like to get my netscaler working with my vpcs. So from what i have tested, it seems that : - i can't share a VPX with more than one VPC ? - in order to get my netscaler working with my vpc, i need to declare it dedicated. So it can't be used both with vpc tiers and isolated networks ? - i can use netscaler with a vpc only with public tier (means external tier) Can you confirm these limitations, or is it due to a misconfiguration of my own networks offerings ? So another question is : How can i achieve ns-lb with several tiers in a vpc ? I have a vpc with web-tier, app-tier and sql-tier : how can i have in the same time, nslb between outside and web-tier, nslb between web-tier and app-tier and nslb between app-tier and sql-tier, having only one VPX ? Thanks four your lights. Regards, Benoit. -- Francois Gaudreault Gestionnaire de Produit | Product Manager - Cloud Platform Services t:514-629-6775 CloudOps Votre partenaire infonuagique | Cloud Solutions Experts 420 rue Guy | Montreal | Quebec | H3J 1S6 w: cloudops.com | tw: @CloudOps_
Re: API calls and keys
I have implemented a few of the cs api calls via php, like listVirtualMachines, using CloudStackClient. I need to implement the view console via a api call. I saw on some net posting's, the url used: http://xx.xx.xx.xx:8080/client/console?cmd=accessvm=xsignature=XX or http://xx.xx.xx.xx:8080/client/api?cmd=accessvm=xsignature=XX http://XXX.XXX.XXX.5:8080/client/console?cmd=accessvm=---- The need is to pass the string to the browser, without exposing the (secret key / api key) signature, which will be showed in the browser url, when the user clicks on the link. Or is there any direct cloudstack api which can be called? Any ideas on this? From: abhisek basu abhisekb...@msn.com To: users@cloudstack.apache.org users@cloudstack.apache.org Cc: d...@cloudstack.apache.org d...@cloudstack.apache.org Sent: Wednesday, 3 September 2014 8:43 PM Subject: Re: API calls and keys You need to generate the signature; sample code us here: http://abhisekbasu.wordpress.com/2013/11/19/how-to-generate-signature-for-cloudstack-api/ You may also consider using login api in your scenario. Sent from my iPhone On 3 Sep 2014, at 8:11 pm, Giri Prasad g_p...@yahoo.com.INVALID wrote: Hello, I am using a html/php script to read in userid, password and domain id from the user. Using CloudStackClient.php, I am able to call most of the api's, like list vm's, and the output seems correct. And I want to use some API's via a href like: http://XXX.XXX.XXX.5:8080/client/api?command=startVirtualMachineid=---- http://XXX.XXX.XXX.5:8080/client/api?command=stopVirtualMachineid=---- http://XXX.XXX.XXX.5:8080/client/console?cmd=accessvm=---- I need to add dynamically the apikey and signature: apiKey=miVr6X7u6bN_sdahOBpjNejPgEsT35eXqjB8CG20YI3yaxXcgpyuaIRmFI_EJTVwZ0nUkkJbPmY3y2bciKwFQ signature=Lxx1DM40AjcXU%2FcaiK8RAP0O1hU%3D since apikey and signature are required, are there, any api's, where I can dynamically, get it from the CS infra, and use the return values, for building the apiKey and signature part of the url. I need to get the apikey and signature dynamically, for a specific user (userid/passwd), and then use it, for building the url. Thanks Regards, Giri Without apikeys and signature: startvirtualmachineresponse cloud-stack-version=4.1.1errorcode401/errorcodeerrortextunable to verify user credentials and/or request signature/errortext/startvirtualmachineresponse console?cmd=access Access denied. Invalid web session or API key in request
Simulator Build Failed
I am trying to build Cloudstack from the source and was able to build Cloudstack following the steps in the documentation. But when I try to build the simulator, I encountered with following errors: [INFO] Scanning for projects... [INFO] [INFO] [INFO] Building Apache CloudStack marvin 4.3.1 [INFO] [INFO] [INFO] --- gmaven-plugin:1.5:execute (setproperty) @ cloud-marvin --- [INFO] [INFO] --- exec-maven-plugin:1.2.1:exec (generate-sources) @ cloud-marvin --- [INFO] [INFO] --- maven-remote-resources-plugin:1.3:process (default) @ cloud-marvin --- [INFO] [INFO] --- maven-site-plugin:3.1:attach-descriptor (attach-descriptor) @ cloud-marvin --- [INFO] [INFO] --- exec-maven-plugin:1.2.1:exec (pre-integration-test) @ cloud-marvin --- Step1 :Parsing Options And Check Went Fine Exception Occurred Under __deployDC : Execute cmd: addcluster failed, due to: errorCode: 431, errorText:Could not find corresponding resource manager for simulator Marvin Initialization Failed [INFO] [INFO] BUILD FAILURE [INFO] [INFO] Total time: 50.773s [INFO] Finished at: Fri Sep 05 03:04:24 IST 2014 [INFO] Final Memory: 31M/235M [INFO] [ERROR] Failed to execute goal org.codehaus.mojo:exec-maven-plugin:1.2.1:exec (pre-integration-test) on project cloud-marvin: Command execution failed. Process exited with an error: 1 (Exit value: 1) - [Help 1] [ERROR] [ERROR] To see the full stack trace of the errors, re-run Maven with the -e switch. [ERROR] Re-run Maven using the -X switch to enable full debug logging. [ERROR] [ERROR] For more information about the errors and possible solutions, please read the following articles: [ERROR] [Help 1] http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MAVEN/MojoExecutionException Is this a problem with the simulator ? What causes this error? Is there a way to fix this and proceed? I have build Cloudstack 4.3 branch. Any help would be appreciated. Thank you. -- ___ [image: photo] *Deepal Jayasekara* Undergraduate, Department Of Computer Science And Engineering University of Moratuwa, Sri Lanka | mobile: +94712070097 | blog: *insiderattack.blogspot.com http://insiderattack.blogspot.com* https://www.facebook.com/deepal.cse10 https://twitter.com/dpjayasekara http://www.linkedin.com/profile/view?id=127692449authType=NAME_SEARCHauthToken=Nn4Zlocale=en_USsrchid=1276924491381815604317srchindex=1srchtotal=1trk=vsrp_people_res_nametrkInfo=VSRPsearchId%3A1276924491381815604317%2CVSRPtargetId%3A127692449%2CVSRPcmpt%3Aprimary
Re: Live migration
Hello,
Looks like migration fails in this scenario:
1.) New internal network, I will call it - NET1
2.) When perform migration to host without running instance with NET1,
live migration fails.
Also, when cloudstack create instance in other host (to which live
migration fails), after that I can live migrate successfully, without
problems.
And again, if I live migrate all instances to one host, I can't migrate
back if there in no running instance with NET1 network.
Sometimes again, VM's fail to launch, problem same, as described here:
http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.apache.cloudstack.devel/41290
Migration error: http://pastebin.com/zhiqdy64
Grep job id from management log: http://pastebin.com/087Q3SRx
Shared networks in Advanced zone looks like not working as I expected,
because in network creation I should put VLAN ID.
On 2014.09.04. 20:56, Mārtiņš Jakubovičs wrote:
Hello Geoff,
Thanks for clarification. I have XenServer 6.2 pool, with all patches. I
can send tomorrow both error logs when I use GRE and when I use VLAN
guest network and live migration fails...
I have 4 nic's, 2 nic's are bonded and are used for management and
storage. 1 public nic (internet). 1 internal nic, for GRE tunnels or as
secondary shared network for internal use.
Can you, please, point me in a way how I can create Advanced networking
with two shared networks? Should I use two Guest networks without Public
network?
Thanks.
On 2014.09.04. 20:08, Geoff Higginbottom wrote:
Hi Martin,
ACS 4.3 Advanced Zone Live Migration certainly does work, both within
the same Pool (using shared storage) , and across Pools / Shared
Storage (assume you are using XenServer as you mention Pool) Live
migration also works across any VMware Host or KVM Host within a Zone,
as long as you have configured Zone wide Primary Storage.
Basic Zone only allows you to have the one Guest Network, but if your
end goal is to have each VM with a NIC on an Internal Network, and a
NIC on a Public Network this can easily be achieved with Advanced
Networking, using Shared Networks.
Advanced Zones with Security Groups do work, what Hypervisor were you
using for this.
Regards
Geoff Higginbottom
D: +44 20 3603 0542 | S: +44 20 3603 0540 | M: +447968161581
geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com
-Original Message-
From: Mārtiņš Jakubovičs [mailto:mart...@vertigs.lv]
Sent: 04 September 2014 15:32
To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Live migration
Hello all,
In ACS 4.3 with advanced zone, live migration works? I tested guest
network with VLAN and GRE, but in both cases pool based live migration
fails.
Is it possible to setup something like basic zone setup, but with two
networks? I want instances with two interfaces, one with public nic,
other with internal nic. I tryed to create advanced zone with security
groups, but it fails.
Thanks.
Find out more about ShapeBlue and our range of CloudStack related
services
IaaS Cloud Design
Buildhttp://shapeblue.com/iaas-cloud-design-and-build//
CSForge – rapid IaaS deployment frameworkhttp://shapeblue.com/csforge/
CloudStack Consultinghttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-consultancy/
CloudStack Infrastructure
Supporthttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-infrastructure-support/
CloudStack Bootcamp Training
Courseshttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/
This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are
intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed.
Any views or opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do
not necessarily represent those of Shape Blue Ltd or related
companies. If you are not the intended recipient of this email, you
must neither take any action based upon its contents, nor copy or show
it to anyone. Please contact the sender if you believe you have
received this email in error. Shape Blue Ltd is a company incorporated
in England Wales. ShapeBlue Services India LLP is a company
incorporated in India and is operated under license from Shape Blue
Ltd. Shape Blue Brasil Consultoria Ltda is a company incorporated in
Brasil and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue SA
Pty Ltd is a company registered by The Republic of South Africa and is
traded under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue is a registered
trademark.
INFO [o.a.c.f.j.i.AsyncJobMonitor] (Job-Executor-64:ctx-4b26da7f) Add job-363
into job monitoring
INFO [c.c.v.VirtualMachineManagerImpl] (Job-Executor-64:ctx-4b26da7f
ctx-b5ed4a77) Migrating VM[User|Demo-Local-6-VM] to
Dest[Zone(Id)-Pod(Id)-Cluster(Id)-Host(Id)-Storage(Volume(Id|Type--Pool(Id))]
: Dest[Zone(7)-Pod(5)-Cluster(5)-Host(24)-Storage()]
WARN [c.c.h.x.r.CitrixResourceBase] (DirectAgent-26:ctx-e3c8d87c) Task failed!
Task record: uuid: 2894db93-aada-c709-a3b7-9a7538c491ad
nameLabel: Async.VM.pool_migrate
nameDescription:
allowedOperations: []
currentOperations: {}
created: Fri Sep
Re: Netscaler VPC and multiple inter tiers LB
Hi Francois, Thanks for your response. So i do not need to do deeper tests in order to confirm what i thought. You confirmed all that i feared. As you said it is a very huge problem. I can understand the problematic to have subnet overlapping with several vpc (although you have several users and not just a sysops dept wanting to manage several vpcs). Here again, it is strange, because vpc tiers are vlans isolated, so you can have several times the same subnet present in two differents vpcs, with 802.1Q isolation, even the netscaler could manage this without trouble, isn't it ? Now reducing the opportunities with my netscaler, i don't understand why i can't do Ns-Lb ith all my tiers inside a vpc : I want to host a web application according to the 3-tier model (web reverse proxy, web app server, sql database server), how can i exploit correctly the tcp multiplexing feature of the Netscaler if once passed the web reverse proxy tier, i do pass my request to a simple (too ?) lb internal vm in order to contact my web app server ? However i imagined to do some internal lb for the external tier (web reverse proxy) and to pass the http(s) request to my web app server through the netscaler. But here again when using NS with VPC, it can only be used for external LB and not internal LB. Would you have another solution for this ? (a tweak into mgmt server db) Or is it just impossible to realize ? Although i have 2 Netscaler into my VPC ? (one for the web reverse proxy tier, another for the web app tier) Thanks for your responses. Benoit. 2014-09-05 13:35 GMT+02:00 Francois Gaudreault fgaudrea...@cloudops.com: Hi Benoit, The limitations that you describes are exactly what the implementation is. Dedicated VPX per VPC, only public LB for one tier. However, there is a reasoning behind this. Since users can control their tier subnets, you may have overlapping. That's why you can't have a shared NetScaler for the VPCs. You can't do inter-tier load balancing using the NetScaler if you have it inside CloudStack. To be honest, we also feel this is a huge problem, and we will likely look at our options. You need to use the Internal LB for that piece. Hope it helps/confirms your thoughts :) Francois On 2014-09-05, 6:03 AM, benoit lair wrote: Hello Folks, I'm testing Netscaler VPX with acs 4.3. I have several VPCs deployed into my cloud. I would like to get my netscaler working with my vpcs. So from what i have tested, it seems that : - i can't share a VPX with more than one VPC ? - in order to get my netscaler working with my vpc, i need to declare it dedicated. So it can't be used both with vpc tiers and isolated networks ? - i can use netscaler with a vpc only with public tier (means external tier) Can you confirm these limitations, or is it due to a misconfiguration of my own networks offerings ? So another question is : How can i achieve ns-lb with several tiers in a vpc ? I have a vpc with web-tier, app-tier and sql-tier : how can i have in the same time, nslb between outside and web-tier, nslb between web-tier and app-tier and nslb between app-tier and sql-tier, having only one VPX ? Thanks four your lights. Regards, Benoit. -- Francois Gaudreault Gestionnaire de Produit | Product Manager - Cloud Platform Services t:514-629-6775 CloudOps Votre partenaire infonuagique | Cloud Solutions Experts 420 rue Guy | Montreal | Quebec | H3J 1S6 w: cloudops.com | tw: @CloudOps_
Unable to create a deployment for VM with available resources
Hi, I have avaiable resources on my host (8 xens), but when I want to create 'big machine' (4 cores with 16GB of RAM) I can't. Only error that are in catalina.out is this: INFO [user.vm.DeployVMCmd] (Job-Executor-98:job-7688) Unable to create a deployment for VM[User|test] com.cloud.exception.InsufficientServerCapacityException: Unable to create a deployment for VM[User|test]Scope=interface com.cloud.dc.DataCenter; id=1 at org.apache.cloudstack.engine.cloud.entity.api.VMEntityManagerImpl.reserveVirtualMachine(VMEntityManagerImpl.java:186) at org.apache.cloudstack.engine.cloud.entity.api.VirtualMachineEntityImpl.reserve(VirtualMachineEntityImpl.java:198) at com.cloud.vm.UserVmManagerImpl.startVirtualMachine(UserVmManagerImpl.java:3870) at com.cloud.vm.UserVmManagerImpl.startVirtualMachine(UserVmManagerImpl.java:3464) at com.cloud.vm.UserVmManagerImpl.startVirtualMachine(UserVmManagerImpl.java:3450) at com.cloud.utils.component.ComponentInstantiationPostProcessor$InterceptorDispatcher.intercept(ComponentInstantiationPostProcessor.java:125) at org.apache.cloudstack.api.command.user.vm.DeployVMCmd.execute(DeployVMCmd.java:379) at com.cloud.api.ApiDispatcher.dispatch(ApiDispatcher.java:162) at com.cloud.async.AsyncJobManagerImpl$1.run(AsyncJobManagerImpl.java:437) at java.util.concurrent.Executors$RunnableAdapter.call(Executors.java:471) at java.util.concurrent.FutureTask$Sync.innerRun(FutureTask.java:334) at java.util.concurrent.FutureTask.run(FutureTask.java:166) at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1145) at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:615) at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:722) If I want to create machine with 4 cores and 8GB of RAM, there is no problem. I have a avaiable resources on my servers to create that specific machine with 4c,16GB. Any ideas? -- Best Regards, Michael
Migration error
Hello,
I create VM and first time migrated successfully. Second migration error
Cloudstack 4.4, xenserver 6.2
Error /var/log/cloudstack/management/management-server.log:
2014-09-05 09:29:46,059 DEBUG [c.c.a.m.DirectAgentAttache]
(DirectAgent-150:ctx-2f13d1ed) Seq 13-4340625615855026180: Executing request
2014-09-05 09:29:46,080 DEBUG [c.c.a.m.DirectAgentAttache]
(DirectAgent-150:ctx-2f13d1ed) Seq 13-4340625615855026180: Response
Received:
2014-09-05 09:29:46,080 DEBUG [c.c.a.t.Request]
(DirectAgent-150:ctx-2f13d1ed) Seq 13-4340625615855026180: Processing:
{ Ans: , MgmtId: 119169995887277, via: 13, Ver: v1, Flags: 10,
[{com.cloud.agent.api.ClusterVMMetaDataSyncAnswer:{_clusterId:1,_isExecuted:false,result:true,wait:0}}]
}
2014-09-05 09:29:46,858 DEBUG [c.c.a.ApiServlet]
(catalina-exec-3:ctx-83b8f412) ===START=== 192.168.11.36 -- GET
command=migrateVirtualMachineWithVolumehostid=2144c7a0-c0fe-4003-a3a7-31a6e6074f5bvirtualmachineid=37f0ac55-94f3-4c27-a318-83e48d6724e4response=jsonsessionkey=%2FiZXhDJVVkXsA%2BF%2FBpWlQmV%2BbEM%3D_=1409923786054
2014-09-05 09:29:46,918 DEBUG [o.a.c.f.j.i.AsyncJobManagerImpl]
(catalina-exec-3:ctx-83b8f412 ctx-d4b68fa7) submit async job-1505,
details: AsyncJobVO {id:1505, userId: 2, accountId: 2, instanceType:
None, instanceId: null, cmd:
org.apache.cloudstack.api.command.admin.vm.MigrateVirtualMachineWithVolumeCmd,
cmdInfo:
{response:json,sessionkey:/iZXhDJVVkXsA+F/BpWlQmV+bEM\u003d,ctxDetails:{\com.cloud.vm.VirtualMachine\:\37f0ac55-94f3-4c27-a318-83e48d6724e4\,\com.cloud.host.Host\:\2144c7a0-c0fe-4003-a3a7-31a6e6074f5b\},virtualmachineid:37f0ac55-94f3-4c27-a318-83e48d6724e4,cmdEventType:VM.MIGRATE,hostid:2144c7a0-c0fe-4003-a3a7-31a6e6074f5b,ctxUserId:2,httpmethod:GET,_:1409923786054,ctxAccountId:2,ctxStartEventId:1636},
cmdVersion: 0, status: IN_PROGRESS, processStatus: 0, resultCode: 0,
result: null, initMsid: 119169995887277, completeMsid: null,
lastUpdated: null, lastPolled: null, created: null}
2014-09-05 09:29:46,919 INFO [o.a.c.f.j.i.AsyncJobMonitor]
(API-Job-Executor-117:ctx-b9105a91 job-1505) Add job-1505 into job
monitoring
2014-09-05 09:29:46,919 DEBUG [o.a.c.f.j.i.AsyncJobManagerImpl]
(API-Job-Executor-117:ctx-b9105a91 job-1505) Executing AsyncJobVO
{id:1505, userId: 2, accountId: 2, instanceType: None, instanceId: null,
cmd:
org.apache.cloudstack.api.command.admin.vm.MigrateVirtualMachineWithVolumeCmd,
cmdInfo:
{response:json,sessionkey:/iZXhDJVVkXsA+F/BpWlQmV+bEM\u003d,ctxDetails:{\com.cloud.vm.VirtualMachine\:\37f0ac55-94f3-4c27-a318-83e48d6724e4\,\com.cloud.host.Host\:\2144c7a0-c0fe-4003-a3a7-31a6e6074f5b\},virtualmachineid:37f0ac55-94f3-4c27-a318-83e48d6724e4,cmdEventType:VM.MIGRATE,hostid:2144c7a0-c0fe-4003-a3a7-31a6e6074f5b,ctxUserId:2,httpmethod:GET,_:1409923786054,ctxAccountId:2,ctxStartEventId:1636},
cmdVersion: 0, status: IN_PROGRESS, processStatus: 0, resultCode: 0,
result: null, initMsid: 119169995887277, completeMsid: null,
lastUpdated: null, lastPolled: null, created: null}
2014-09-05 09:29:46,919 DEBUG [c.c.a.ApiServlet]
(catalina-exec-3:ctx-83b8f412 ctx-d4b68fa7) ===END=== 192.168.11.36 --
GET
command=migrateVirtualMachineWithVolumehostid=2144c7a0-c0fe-4003-a3a7-31a6e6074f5bvirtualmachineid=37f0ac55-94f3-4c27-a318-83e48d6724e4response=jsonsessionkey=%2FiZXhDJVVkXsA%2BF%2FBpWlQmV%2BbEM%3D_=1409923786054
2014-09-05 09:29:47,003 DEBUG [o.a.c.f.j.i.AsyncJobManagerImpl]
(API-Job-Executor-117:ctx-b9105a91 job-1505 ctx-61fde895) Sync job-1506
execution on object VmWorkJobQueue.159
2014-09-05 09:29:47,004 WARN [c.c.u.d.Merovingian2]
(API-Job-Executor-117:ctx-b9105a91 job-1505 ctx-61fde895) Was unable to
find lock for the key vm_instance159 and thread id 1202515378
2014-09-05 09:29:47,290 DEBUG [o.a.c.f.j.i.AsyncJobManagerImpl]
(AsyncJobMgr-Heartbeat-1:ctx-04c93a4f) Execute sync-queue item:
SyncQueueItemVO {id:263, queueId: 910, contentType: AsyncJob, contentId:
1506, lastProcessMsid: null, lastprocessNumber: null, lastProcessTime:
null, created: Fri Sep 05 09:29:47 EDT 2014}
2014-09-05 09:29:47,291 DEBUG [o.a.c.f.j.i.AsyncJobManagerImpl]
(AsyncJobMgr-Heartbeat-1:ctx-04c93a4f) Schedule queued job-1506
2014-09-05 09:29:47,324 INFO [o.a.c.f.j.i.AsyncJobMonitor]
(Work-Job-Executor-50:ctx-4b8faae5 job-1505/job-1506) Add job-1506 into
job monitoring
2014-09-05 09:29:47,324 DEBUG [o.a.c.f.j.i.AsyncJobManagerImpl]
(Work-Job-Executor-50:ctx-4b8faae5 job-1505/job-1506) Executing
AsyncJobVO {id:1506, userId: 2, accountId: 2, instanceType: null,
instanceId: null, cmd: com.cloud.vm.VmWorkMigrate, cmdInfo:
Cannot add instances using template created from snapshot
I followed this https://github.com/imduffy15/GSoC-2014/ and installed apache cloudstack with basic networking in my local machine, and every thing worked smoothly. I can add instances from the built in tiny linux template(cent-os 5.6 64bit) without having any issue. I got a snapshot of the running instance volume and created a template from it. When I try to add an instance using that template I always get *InsufficientServerCapacityException*. According to my dashboard there are enough capacity to add the instance. Any ideas? console: WARN [o.a.c.alerts] (API-Job-Executor-5:ctx-4692c763 job-166 ctx-b141500e) alertType:: 8 // dataCenterId:: 1 // podId:: null // clusterId:: null // message:: Failed to deploy Vm with Id: 29, on Host with Id: null INFO [o.a.c.a.c.a.v.DeployVMCmdByAdmin] (API-Job-Executor-5:ctx-4692c763 job-166 ctx-b141500e) com.cloud.exception.InsufficientServerCapacityException: Unable to create a deployment for VM[User|i-2-29-VM]Scope=interface com.cloud.dc.DataCenter; id=1 INFO [o.a.c.a.c.a.v.DeployVMCmdByAdmin] (API-Job-Executor-5:ctx-4692c763 job-166 ctx-b141500e) Unable to create a deployment for VM[User|i-2-29-VM] com.cloud.exception.InsufficientServerCapacityException: Unable to create a deployment for VM[User|i-2-29-VM]Scope=interface com.cloud.dc.DataCenter; id=1 at org.apache.cloudstack.engine.cloud.entity.api.VMEntityManagerImpl.reserveVirtualMachine(VMEntityManagerImpl.java:214) at org.apache.cloudstack.engine.cloud.entity.api.VirtualMachineEntityImpl.reserve(VirtualMachineEntityImpl.java:200) at com.cloud.vm.UserVmManagerImpl.startVirtualMachine(UserVmManagerImpl.java:3515) at com.cloud.vm.UserVmManagerImpl.startVirtualMachine(UserVmManagerImpl.java:3166) at com.cloud.vm.UserVmManagerImpl.startVirtualMachine(UserVmManagerImpl.java:3154) at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method) at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:57) at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43) at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:606) at org.springframework.aop.support.AopUtils.invokeJoinpointUsingReflection(AopUtils.java:317) at org.springframework.aop.framework.ReflectiveMethodInvocation.invokeJoinpoint(ReflectiveMethodInvocation.java:183) at org.springframework.aop.framework.ReflectiveMethodInvocation.proceed(ReflectiveMethodInvocation.java:150) at org.apache.cloudstack.network.contrail.management.EventUtils$EventInterceptor.invoke(EventUtils.java:106) at org.springframework.aop.framework.ReflectiveMethodInvocation.proceed(ReflectiveMethodInvocation.java:161) at com.cloud.event.ActionEventInterceptor.invoke(ActionEventInterceptor.java:51) at org.springframework.aop.framework.ReflectiveMethodInvocation.proceed(ReflectiveMethodInvocation.java:161) at org.springframework.aop.interceptor.ExposeInvocationInterceptor.invoke(ExposeInvocationInterceptor.java:91) at org.springframework.aop.framework.ReflectiveMethodInvocation.proceed(ReflectiveMethodInvocation.java:172) at org.springframework.aop.framework.JdkDynamicAopProxy.invoke(JdkDynamicAopProxy.java:204) at com.sun.proxy.$Proxy224.startVirtualMachine(Unknown Source) at org.apache.cloudstack.api.command.admin.vm.DeployVMCmdByAdmin.execute(DeployVMCmdByAdmin.java:48) at com.cloud.api.ApiDispatcher.dispatch(ApiDispatcher.java:141) at com.cloud.api.ApiAsyncJobDispatcher.runJob(ApiAsyncJobDispatcher.java:108) at org.apache.cloudstack.framework.jobs.impl.AsyncJobManagerImpl$5.runInContext(AsyncJobManagerImpl.java:503) at org.apache.cloudstack.managed.context.ManagedContextRunnable$1.run(ManagedContextRunnable.java:49) at org.apache.cloudstack.managed.context.impl.DefaultManagedContext$1.call(DefaultManagedContext.java:56) at org.apache.cloudstack.managed.context.impl.DefaultManagedContext.callWithContext(DefaultManagedContext.java:103) at org.apache.cloudstack.managed.context.impl.DefaultManagedContext.runWithContext(DefaultManagedContext.java:53) at org.apache.cloudstack.managed.context.ManagedContextRunnable.run(ManagedContextRunnable.java:46) at org.apache.cloudstack.framework.jobs.impl.AsyncJobManagerImpl$5.run(AsyncJobManagerImpl.java:460) at java.util.concurrent.Executors$RunnableAdapter.call(Executors.java:471) at java.util.concurrent.FutureTask.run(FutureTask.java:262) at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1145) at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:615) at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:745) -- Thanks, Regards, ASH
Error Creating Backup Cloud database
Hello, i'm trying to generate a backup of cloud database but it's generating this error. Any idea why or how can I made a Backup of cloud database? ERROR 1356 (HY000) at line 8807: View 'cloud_test.account_netstats_view' references invalid table(s) or column(s) or function(s) or definer/invoker of view lack rights to use them thanks -- Hollman Eduardo Enciso R. http://algolibre.com @hollman
[CALL FOR SPEAKERS] CloudStack Silicon Valley User Group
Hi all, John Kinsella and I are kicking off the Beginner’s Guide to Apache CloudStack Series and plan to hold 4 meetups over the next 3 months. We’ve had around 170 new members join the CloudStack Silicon Valley User Group this year (there are a total of 465 members in the group as of now). I created a poll within the CloudStack Silicon Valley User Group and there’s quite a few members that have shown interest in the beginner’s series: http://www.meetup.com/CloudStack-Silicon-Valley-User-Group/polls/ We’d like to get a variety of speakers scheduled in for the next 4 meetups. Will anyone be in the San Francisco/ Santa Clara, CA US area during any of the months below and would like to speak on one of the topics? Beginner’s Guide to Apache CloudStack Series: Part 1 – Intro to CloudStack (September 16th). Part 2 – CloudStack Use Cases (September). Part 3 – CloudStack Networking (October). Part 4 – Monitoring CloudStack (November). If you’re interested in speaking at one of the meetups or have any questions, please feel free to reach out to me. Thanks! Cheers, Karen
RE: API calls and keys
What about using POST via AJAX instead of using implied GET in the link? -Original Message- From: Giri Prasad [mailto:g_p...@yahoo.com.INVALID] Sent: Friday, September 05, 2014 4:47 AM To: d...@cloudstack.apache.org; users@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: API calls and keys I have implemented a few of the cs api calls via php, like listVirtualMachines, using CloudStackClient. I need to implement the view console via a api call. I saw on some net posting's, the url used: http://xx.xx.xx.xx:8080/client/console?cmd=accessvm=xsignature=XX or http://xx.xx.xx.xx:8080/client/api?cmd=accessvm=xsignature=XX http://XXX.XXX.XXX.5:8080/client/console?cmd=accessvm=---- The need is to pass the string to the browser, without exposing the (secret key / api key) signature, which will be showed in the browser url, when the user clicks on the link. Or is there any direct cloudstack api which can be called? Any ideas on this? From: abhisek basu abhisekb...@msn.com To: users@cloudstack.apache.org users@cloudstack.apache.org Cc: d...@cloudstack.apache.org d...@cloudstack.apache.org Sent: Wednesday, 3 September 2014 8:43 PM Subject: Re: API calls and keys You need to generate the signature; sample code us here: http://abhisekbasu.wordpress.com/2013/11/19/how-to-generate-signature-for-cloudstack-api/ You may also consider using login api in your scenario. Sent from my iPhone On 3 Sep 2014, at 8:11 pm, Giri Prasad g_p...@yahoo.com.INVALID wrote: Hello, I am using a html/php script to read in userid, password and domain id from the user. Using CloudStackClient.php, I am able to call most of the api's, like list vm's, and the output seems correct. And I want to use some API's via a href like: http://XXX.XXX.XXX.5:8080/client/api?command=startVirtualMachineid=aa aa---- http://XXX.XXX.XXX.5:8080/client/api?command=stopVirtualMachineid=aaa a---- http://XXX.XXX.XXX.5:8080/client/console?cmd=accessvm=--c ccc-- I need to add dynamically the apikey and signature: apiKey=miVr6X7u6bN_sdahOBpjNejPgEsT35eXqjB8CG20YI3yaxXcgpyuaIRmFI_EJT VwZ0nUkkJbPmY3y2bciKwFQ signature=Lxx1DM40AjcXU%2FcaiK8RAP0O1hU%3D since apikey and signature are required, are there, any api's, where I can dynamically, get it from the CS infra, and use the return values, for building the apiKey and signature part of the url. I need to get the apikey and signature dynamically, for a specific user (userid/passwd), and then use it, for building the url. Thanks Regards, Giri Without apikeys and signature: startvirtualmachineresponse cloud-stack-version=4.1.1errorcode401/errorcodeerrortextunabl e to verify user credentials and/or request signature/errortext/startvirtualmachineresponse console?cmd=access Access denied. Invalid web session or API key in request
Changing VPC VR system offering
HI, Where can I assign another System Offering to my VPC VR? I can select it for shared networks, but not VRs Thanks! -- Francois Gaudreault Gestionnaire de Produit | Product Manager - Cloud Platform Services t:514-629-6775 CloudOps Votre partenaire infonuagique | Cloud Solutions Experts 420 rue Guy | Montreal | Quebec | H3J 1S6 w: cloudops.com | tw: @CloudOps_
FreeBSD10 ISO Template not working
Hello, I have just upgraded to cloudstack 4.4 I was previously using 4.2, and I was able to get my FreeBSD10 templates creating VM's on a Xenserver 6.2 server. Now, whenever I try, I am getting a status message of Job failed due to exception Unable to create a deployment for VM[User|i-2-7-VM]. Below are some relevant stack dumps. Any ideas? Thanks! 2014-08-26 17:01:35,207 DEBUG [c.c.h.x.r.CitrixResourceBase] (DirectAgent-333:ctx-06b8cfa3) 1. The VM i-2-7-VM is in Starting state. 2014-08-26 17:01:35,209 WARN [c.c.h.x.r.XenServer620Resource] (DirectAgent-333:ctx-06b8cfa3) XenServer 6.2.0 DOES NOT support Guest OS type FreeBSD (64-bit) 2014-08-26 17:01:35,212 DEBUG [c.c.h.x.r.CitrixResourceBase] (DirectAgent-333:ctx-06b8cfa3) Cannot find template : null on XS version: com.cloud.hypervisor.xen.resource.XenServer620Resource 2014-08-26 17:01:35,212 WARN [c.c.h.x.r.CitrixResourceBase] (DirectAgent-333:ctx-06b8cfa3) Catch Exception: class java.util.NoSuchElementException due to java.util.NoSuchElementException java.util.NoSuchElementException at java.util.LinkedHashMap$LinkedHashIterator.nextEntry(LinkedHashMap.java:396) at java.util.LinkedHashMap$KeyIterator.next(LinkedHashMap.java:405) at com.cloud.hypervisor.xen.resource.CitrixResourceBase.createVmFromTemplate(CitrixResourceBase.java:1302) at com.cloud.hypervisor.xen.resource.CitrixResourceBase.execute(CitrixResourceBase.java:1730) at com.cloud.hypervisor.xen.resource.CitrixResourceBase.executeRequest(CitrixResourceBase.java:504) at com.cloud.hypervisor.xen.resource.XenServer56Resource.executeRequest(XenServer56Resource.java:61) at com.cloud.hypervisor.xen.resource.XenServer610Resource.executeRequest(XenServer610Resource.java:102) at com.cloud.agent.manager.DirectAgentAttache$Task.runInContext(DirectAgentAttache.java:216) at org.apache.cloudstack.managed.context.ManagedContextRunnable$1.run(ManagedContextRunnable.java:49) at org.apache.cloudstack.managed.context.impl.DefaultManagedContext$1.call(DefaultManagedContext.java:56) at org.apache.cloudstack.managed.context.impl.DefaultManagedContext.callWithContext(DefaultManagedContext.java:103) at org.apache.cloudstack.managed.context.impl.DefaultManagedContext.runWithContext(DefaultManagedContext.java:53) at org.apache.cloudstack.managed.context.ManagedContextRunnable.run(ManagedContextRunnable.java:46) at java.util.concurrent.Executors$RunnableAdapter.call(Executors.java:471) at java.util.concurrent.FutureTask.run(FutureTask.java:262) at java.util.concurrent.ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor$ScheduledFutureTask.access$201(ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor.java:178) at java.util.concurrent.ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor$ScheduledFutureTask.run(ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor.java:292) at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1145) at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:615) at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:745) 2014-08-26 17:01:35,213 WARN [c.c.h.x.r.CitrixResourceBase] (DirectAgent-333:ctx-06b8cfa3) Unable to start i-2-7-VM due to java.util.NoSuchElementException at java.util.LinkedHashMap$LinkedHashIterator.nextEntry(LinkedHashMap.java:396) at java.util.LinkedHashMap$KeyIterator.next(LinkedHashMap.java:405) at com.cloud.hypervisor.xen.resource.CitrixResourceBase.createVmFromTemplate(CitrixResourceBase.java:1302) at com.cloud.hypervisor.xen.resource.CitrixResourceBase.execute(CitrixResourceBase.java:1730) at com.cloud.hypervisor.xen.resource.CitrixResourceBase.executeRequest(CitrixResourceBase.java:504) at com.cloud.hypervisor.xen.resource.XenServer56Resource.executeRequest(XenServer56Resource.java:61) at com.cloud.hypervisor.xen.resource.XenServer610Resource.executeRequest(XenServer610Resource.java:102) at com.cloud.agent.manager.DirectAgentAttache$Task.runInContext(DirectAgentAttache.java:216) at org.apache.cloudstack.managed.context.ManagedContextRunnable$1.run(ManagedContextRunnable.java:49) at org.apache.cloudstack.managed.context.impl.DefaultManagedContext$1.call(DefaultManagedContext.java:56) at org.apache.cloudstack.managed.context.impl.DefaultManagedContext.callWithContext(DefaultManagedContext.java:103) at org.apache.cloudstack.managed.context.impl.DefaultManagedContext.runWithContext(DefaultManagedContext.java:53) at org.apache.cloudstack.managed.context.ManagedContextRunnable.run(ManagedContextRunnable.java:46) at java.util.concurrent.Executors$RunnableAdapter.call(Executors.java:471) at java.util.concurrent.FutureTask.run(FutureTask.java:262) at java.util.concurrent.ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor$ScheduledFutureTask.access$201(ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor.java:178) at java.util.concurrent.ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor$ScheduledFutureTask.run(ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor.java:292) at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1145) at
Re: FreeBSD10 ISO Template not working
Hi Derek, I was having similar issue. to resolved, register the ISO as OS Type = Other 64 once you get the Operating System installed go to /usr/ports/sysutility/xen-tools make install clean also install, /usr/ports/sysutility/xe-guest make install clean once that is done: /usr/local/bin/xen-detect and you should be good to go, I am also running CS 4.4 XenServer. Thanks, Motty On Fri, Sep 5, 2014 at 2:23 PM, Derek Cole derek.c...@gmail.com wrote: Hello, I have just upgraded to cloudstack 4.4 I was previously using 4.2, and I was able to get my FreeBSD10 templates creating VM's on a Xenserver 6.2 server. Now, whenever I try, I am getting a status message of Job failed due to exception Unable to create a deployment for VM[User|i-2-7-VM]. Below are some relevant stack dumps. Any ideas? Thanks! 2014-08-26 17:01:35,207 DEBUG [c.c.h.x.r.CitrixResourceBase] (DirectAgent-333:ctx-06b8cfa3) 1. The VM i-2-7-VM is in Starting state. 2014-08-26 17:01:35,209 WARN [c.c.h.x.r.XenServer620Resource] (DirectAgent-333:ctx-06b8cfa3) XenServer 6.2.0 DOES NOT support Guest OS type FreeBSD (64-bit) 2014-08-26 17:01:35,212 DEBUG [c.c.h.x.r.CitrixResourceBase] (DirectAgent-333:ctx-06b8cfa3) Cannot find template : null on XS version: com.cloud.hypervisor.xen.resource.XenServer620Resource 2014-08-26 17:01:35,212 WARN [c.c.h.x.r.CitrixResourceBase] (DirectAgent-333:ctx-06b8cfa3) Catch Exception: class java.util.NoSuchElementException due to java.util.NoSuchElementException java.util.NoSuchElementException at java.util.LinkedHashMap$LinkedHashIterator.nextEntry(LinkedHashMap.java:396) at java.util.LinkedHashMap$KeyIterator.next(LinkedHashMap.java:405) at com.cloud.hypervisor.xen.resource.CitrixResourceBase.createVmFromTemplate(CitrixResourceBase.java:1302) at com.cloud.hypervisor.xen.resource.CitrixResourceBase.execute(CitrixResourceBase.java:1730) at com.cloud.hypervisor.xen.resource.CitrixResourceBase.executeRequest(CitrixResourceBase.java:504) at com.cloud.hypervisor.xen.resource.XenServer56Resource.executeRequest(XenServer56Resource.java:61) at com.cloud.hypervisor.xen.resource.XenServer610Resource.executeRequest(XenServer610Resource.java:102) at com.cloud.agent.manager.DirectAgentAttache$Task.runInContext(DirectAgentAttache.java:216) at org.apache.cloudstack.managed.context.ManagedContextRunnable$1.run(ManagedContextRunnable.java:49) at org.apache.cloudstack.managed.context.impl.DefaultManagedContext$1.call(DefaultManagedContext.java:56) at org.apache.cloudstack.managed.context.impl.DefaultManagedContext.callWithContext(DefaultManagedContext.java:103) at org.apache.cloudstack.managed.context.impl.DefaultManagedContext.runWithContext(DefaultManagedContext.java:53) at org.apache.cloudstack.managed.context.ManagedContextRunnable.run(ManagedContextRunnable.java:46) at java.util.concurrent.Executors$RunnableAdapter.call(Executors.java:471) at java.util.concurrent.FutureTask.run(FutureTask.java:262) at java.util.concurrent.ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor$ScheduledFutureTask.access$201(ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor.java:178) at java.util.concurrent.ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor$ScheduledFutureTask.run(ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor.java:292) at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1145) at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:615) at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:745) 2014-08-26 17:01:35,213 WARN [c.c.h.x.r.CitrixResourceBase] (DirectAgent-333:ctx-06b8cfa3) Unable to start i-2-7-VM due to java.util.NoSuchElementException at java.util.LinkedHashMap$LinkedHashIterator.nextEntry(LinkedHashMap.java:396) at java.util.LinkedHashMap$KeyIterator.next(LinkedHashMap.java:405) at com.cloud.hypervisor.xen.resource.CitrixResourceBase.createVmFromTemplate(CitrixResourceBase.java:1302) at com.cloud.hypervisor.xen.resource.CitrixResourceBase.execute(CitrixResourceBase.java:1730) at com.cloud.hypervisor.xen.resource.CitrixResourceBase.executeRequest(CitrixResourceBase.java:504) at com.cloud.hypervisor.xen.resource.XenServer56Resource.executeRequest(XenServer56Resource.java:61) at com.cloud.hypervisor.xen.resource.XenServer610Resource.executeRequest(XenServer610Resource.java:102) at com.cloud.agent.manager.DirectAgentAttache$Task.runInContext(DirectAgentAttache.java:216) at org.apache.cloudstack.managed.context.ManagedContextRunnable$1.run(ManagedContextRunnable.java:49) at org.apache.cloudstack.managed.context.impl.DefaultManagedContext$1.call(DefaultManagedContext.java:56) at org.apache.cloudstack.managed.context.impl.DefaultManagedContext.callWithContext(DefaultManagedContext.java:103) at org.apache.cloudstack.managed.context.impl.DefaultManagedContext.runWithContext(DefaultManagedContext.java:53) at
Re: FreeBSD10 ISO Template not working
Thanks! I had just stumbled across your thread as I was continuing to search. I was able to get the ISO installed and boot a VM by selecting other. I will try to get those xen-tools installed as well. On Fri, Sep 5, 2014 at 5:30 PM, motty cruz motty.c...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Derek, I was having similar issue. to resolved, register the ISO as OS Type = Other 64 once you get the Operating System installed go to /usr/ports/sysutility/xen-tools make install clean also install, /usr/ports/sysutility/xe-guest make install clean once that is done: /usr/local/bin/xen-detect and you should be good to go, I am also running CS 4.4 XenServer. Thanks, Motty On Fri, Sep 5, 2014 at 2:23 PM, Derek Cole derek.c...@gmail.com wrote: Hello, I have just upgraded to cloudstack 4.4 I was previously using 4.2, and I was able to get my FreeBSD10 templates creating VM's on a Xenserver 6.2 server. Now, whenever I try, I am getting a status message of Job failed due to exception Unable to create a deployment for VM[User|i-2-7-VM]. Below are some relevant stack dumps. Any ideas? Thanks! 2014-08-26 17:01:35,207 DEBUG [c.c.h.x.r.CitrixResourceBase] (DirectAgent-333:ctx-06b8cfa3) 1. The VM i-2-7-VM is in Starting state. 2014-08-26 17:01:35,209 WARN [c.c.h.x.r.XenServer620Resource] (DirectAgent-333:ctx-06b8cfa3) XenServer 6.2.0 DOES NOT support Guest OS type FreeBSD (64-bit) 2014-08-26 17:01:35,212 DEBUG [c.c.h.x.r.CitrixResourceBase] (DirectAgent-333:ctx-06b8cfa3) Cannot find template : null on XS version: com.cloud.hypervisor.xen.resource.XenServer620Resource 2014-08-26 17:01:35,212 WARN [c.c.h.x.r.CitrixResourceBase] (DirectAgent-333:ctx-06b8cfa3) Catch Exception: class java.util.NoSuchElementException due to java.util.NoSuchElementException java.util.NoSuchElementException at java.util.LinkedHashMap$LinkedHashIterator.nextEntry(LinkedHashMap.java:396) at java.util.LinkedHashMap$KeyIterator.next(LinkedHashMap.java:405) at com.cloud.hypervisor.xen.resource.CitrixResourceBase.createVmFromTemplate(CitrixResourceBase.java:1302) at com.cloud.hypervisor.xen.resource.CitrixResourceBase.execute(CitrixResourceBase.java:1730) at com.cloud.hypervisor.xen.resource.CitrixResourceBase.executeRequest(CitrixResourceBase.java:504) at com.cloud.hypervisor.xen.resource.XenServer56Resource.executeRequest(XenServer56Resource.java:61) at com.cloud.hypervisor.xen.resource.XenServer610Resource.executeRequest(XenServer610Resource.java:102) at com.cloud.agent.manager.DirectAgentAttache$Task.runInContext(DirectAgentAttache.java:216) at org.apache.cloudstack.managed.context.ManagedContextRunnable$1.run(ManagedContextRunnable.java:49) at org.apache.cloudstack.managed.context.impl.DefaultManagedContext$1.call(DefaultManagedContext.java:56) at org.apache.cloudstack.managed.context.impl.DefaultManagedContext.callWithContext(DefaultManagedContext.java:103) at org.apache.cloudstack.managed.context.impl.DefaultManagedContext.runWithContext(DefaultManagedContext.java:53) at org.apache.cloudstack.managed.context.ManagedContextRunnable.run(ManagedContextRunnable.java:46) at java.util.concurrent.Executors$RunnableAdapter.call(Executors.java:471) at java.util.concurrent.FutureTask.run(FutureTask.java:262) at java.util.concurrent.ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor$ScheduledFutureTask.access$201(ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor.java:178) at java.util.concurrent.ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor$ScheduledFutureTask.run(ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor.java:292) at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1145) at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:615) at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:745) 2014-08-26 17:01:35,213 WARN [c.c.h.x.r.CitrixResourceBase] (DirectAgent-333:ctx-06b8cfa3) Unable to start i-2-7-VM due to java.util.NoSuchElementException at java.util.LinkedHashMap$LinkedHashIterator.nextEntry(LinkedHashMap.java:396) at java.util.LinkedHashMap$KeyIterator.next(LinkedHashMap.java:405) at com.cloud.hypervisor.xen.resource.CitrixResourceBase.createVmFromTemplate(CitrixResourceBase.java:1302) at com.cloud.hypervisor.xen.resource.CitrixResourceBase.execute(CitrixResourceBase.java:1730) at com.cloud.hypervisor.xen.resource.CitrixResourceBase.executeRequest(CitrixResourceBase.java:504) at com.cloud.hypervisor.xen.resource.XenServer56Resource.executeRequest(XenServer56Resource.java:61) at com.cloud.hypervisor.xen.resource.XenServer610Resource.executeRequest(XenServer610Resource.java:102) at com.cloud.agent.manager.DirectAgentAttache$Task.runInContext(DirectAgentAttache.java:216) at
Re: FreeBSD10 ISO Template not working
no problem, here is what my rc.conf looks like: # cat /etc/rc.conf hostname=ldap ifconfig_xn0=DHCP sshd_enable=YES # Set dumpdev to AUTO to enable crash dumps, NO to disable dumpdev=AUTO xenguest_enable=YES # /usr/local/bin/xen-detect Running in HVM context on Xen v4.1. # pkg info | less xe-guest-utilities-6.0.2_3 FreeBSD VM tools for Citrix XenServer and XCP xen-tools-4.1.3_3 Xen tools within FreeBSD domU Thanks, -Motty On Fri, Sep 5, 2014 at 2:34 PM, Derek Cole derek.c...@gmail.com wrote: Thanks! I had just stumbled across your thread as I was continuing to search. I was able to get the ISO installed and boot a VM by selecting other. I will try to get those xen-tools installed as well. On Fri, Sep 5, 2014 at 5:30 PM, motty cruz motty.c...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Derek, I was having similar issue. to resolved, register the ISO as OS Type = Other 64 once you get the Operating System installed go to /usr/ports/sysutility/xen-tools make install clean also install, /usr/ports/sysutility/xe-guest make install clean once that is done: /usr/local/bin/xen-detect and you should be good to go, I am also running CS 4.4 XenServer. Thanks, Motty On Fri, Sep 5, 2014 at 2:23 PM, Derek Cole derek.c...@gmail.com wrote: Hello, I have just upgraded to cloudstack 4.4 I was previously using 4.2, and I was able to get my FreeBSD10 templates creating VM's on a Xenserver 6.2 server. Now, whenever I try, I am getting a status message of Job failed due to exception Unable to create a deployment for VM[User|i-2-7-VM]. Below are some relevant stack dumps. Any ideas? Thanks! 2014-08-26 17:01:35,207 DEBUG [c.c.h.x.r.CitrixResourceBase] (DirectAgent-333:ctx-06b8cfa3) 1. The VM i-2-7-VM is in Starting state. 2014-08-26 17:01:35,209 WARN [c.c.h.x.r.XenServer620Resource] (DirectAgent-333:ctx-06b8cfa3) XenServer 6.2.0 DOES NOT support Guest OS type FreeBSD (64-bit) 2014-08-26 17:01:35,212 DEBUG [c.c.h.x.r.CitrixResourceBase] (DirectAgent-333:ctx-06b8cfa3) Cannot find template : null on XS version: com.cloud.hypervisor.xen.resource.XenServer620Resource 2014-08-26 17:01:35,212 WARN [c.c.h.x.r.CitrixResourceBase] (DirectAgent-333:ctx-06b8cfa3) Catch Exception: class java.util.NoSuchElementException due to java.util.NoSuchElementException java.util.NoSuchElementException at java.util.LinkedHashMap$LinkedHashIterator.nextEntry(LinkedHashMap.java:396) at java.util.LinkedHashMap$KeyIterator.next(LinkedHashMap.java:405) at com.cloud.hypervisor.xen.resource.CitrixResourceBase.createVmFromTemplate(CitrixResourceBase.java:1302) at com.cloud.hypervisor.xen.resource.CitrixResourceBase.execute(CitrixResourceBase.java:1730) at com.cloud.hypervisor.xen.resource.CitrixResourceBase.executeRequest(CitrixResourceBase.java:504) at com.cloud.hypervisor.xen.resource.XenServer56Resource.executeRequest(XenServer56Resource.java:61) at com.cloud.hypervisor.xen.resource.XenServer610Resource.executeRequest(XenServer610Resource.java:102) at com.cloud.agent.manager.DirectAgentAttache$Task.runInContext(DirectAgentAttache.java:216) at org.apache.cloudstack.managed.context.ManagedContextRunnable$1.run(ManagedContextRunnable.java:49) at org.apache.cloudstack.managed.context.impl.DefaultManagedContext$1.call(DefaultManagedContext.java:56) at org.apache.cloudstack.managed.context.impl.DefaultManagedContext.callWithContext(DefaultManagedContext.java:103) at org.apache.cloudstack.managed.context.impl.DefaultManagedContext.runWithContext(DefaultManagedContext.java:53) at org.apache.cloudstack.managed.context.ManagedContextRunnable.run(ManagedContextRunnable.java:46) at java.util.concurrent.Executors$RunnableAdapter.call(Executors.java:471) at java.util.concurrent.FutureTask.run(FutureTask.java:262) at java.util.concurrent.ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor$ScheduledFutureTask.access$201(ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor.java:178) at java.util.concurrent.ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor$ScheduledFutureTask.run(ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor.java:292) at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1145) at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:615) at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:745) 2014-08-26 17:01:35,213 WARN [c.c.h.x.r.CitrixResourceBase] (DirectAgent-333:ctx-06b8cfa3) Unable to start i-2-7-VM due to java.util.NoSuchElementException at java.util.LinkedHashMap$LinkedHashIterator.nextEntry(LinkedHashMap.java:396) at java.util.LinkedHashMap$KeyIterator.next(LinkedHashMap.java:405) at
