Re: XenServer 6.5 - Security Groups
The security groups are working but with errors. All the recommended settings are in place. In the log files there are many delete failures like: Failed to delete rule log file /var/run/cloud/i-2-4-VM.ip 10.51.212.24-cloud.log:2015-04-17 11:45:08DEBUG [root] Ignoring failure to delete rules for vm i-2-4-VM 10.51.212.24-cloud.log:2015-04-17 11:45:08DEBUG [root] Ignoring failure to delete rules for vm i-2-4-VM 10.51.212.24-cloud.log:2015-04-17 11:45:09DEBUG [root] Ignoring failure to delete ebtables chain for vm i-2-4-VM 10.51.212.24-cloud.log:2015-04-17 11:45:09DEBUG [root] Creating ipset chain i-2-4-VM 10.51.212.24-cloud.log:2015-04-17 11:45:09DEBUG [root] Writing log to /var/run/cloud/i-2-4-VM.log 10.51.212.24-cloud.log:2015-04-17 11:45:09DEBUG [root] Programmed default rules for vm i-2-4-VM 10.51.212.24-cloud.log:2015-04-17 11:45:09DEBUG [root] No change in default info set of vm i-2-4-VM 10.51.212.24-cloud.log:2015-04-17 11:45:09DEBUG [root] Seqno increased from -1 to 17: reprogamming ingress rules for vm i-2-4-VM 10.51.212.24-cloud.log:2015-04-17 11:45:09DEBUG [root] Programming network rules for vm i-2-4-VM seqno=17 numrules=3 signature=fd07c7713376d8906fb71eb8328224ca guestIp=10.170.20.61, update iptables, reason=seqno_change_or_sig_change 10.51.212.24-cloud.log:2015-04-17 11:45:09DEBUG [root] ['iptables', '-I', 'i-2-4-VM', '-p', 'icmp', '--icmp-type', 'any', '-j', 'ACCEPT'] 10.51.212.24-cloud.log:2015-04-17 11:45:09DEBUG [root] ipset chain already existsi-2-4-VM_tcp_22_22 Looks like due to delete failure the subsequent rule change fails to apply ? -abhi On 21-Apr-2015, at 9:56 am, Koushik Das koushik@citrix.com wrote: What is the output of cat /etc/sysctl.conf? Update it as per http://cloudstack-installation.readthedocs.org/en/latest/hypervisor/xenserver.html. If there was an upgrade from XS 6.2 to XS 6.5, then changes to sysctl.conf is not persisted. On 21-Apr-2015, at 6:24 AM, Tim Mackey tmac...@gmail.com wrote: Geoff, was this a fresh install of both XenServer and CloudStack, or was there any post install steps or upgrades? I'm thinking of setting this up and tracing things tomorrow. Might be good to get your logs to compare against what I see. On Apr 20, 2015 3:24 PM, Geoff Higginbottom geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com wrote: FYI we have just re-deployed the environment using ACS 4.4.3 and XenServer 6.2 and now it is all working as expected. We now need to work out if the problem is with ACS 4.5.1 or XenServer 6.5 Regards Geoff Higginbottom D: +44 20 3603 0542 | S: +44 20 3603 0540 | M: +447968161581 geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com -Original Message- From: Geoff Higginbottom [mailto:geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com] Sent: 20 April 2015 17:52 To: users@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: RE: XenServer 6.5 - Security Groups Many thank Somesh Regards Geoff Higginbottom D: +44 20 3603 0542 | S: +44 20 3603 0540 | M: +447968161581 geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com -Original Message- From: Somesh Naidu [mailto:somesh.na...@citrix.com] Sent: 20 April 2015 15:55 To: users@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: RE: XenServer 6.5 - Security Groups I am running 4.5.0. I probably don't use my lab setup that often to encounter these inconsistencies. I will look for any XS hotfixes that have fixes around this area and let you know if I find one. Somesh CloudPlatform Escalations Citrix Systems, Inc. -Original Message- From: Geoff Higginbottom [mailto:geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com] Sent: Monday, April 20, 2015 10:42 AM To: users@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: RE: XenServer 6.5 - Security Groups We are currently testing a 4.5.1 CloudStack deployment with XenServer 6.5 and the Security Groups are very temperamental. Sometimes they allow traffic, sometimes they block it. Lots of errors in the cloud.log file on the XenServer saying failed to update iptables etc Regards Geoff Higginbottom D: +44 20 3603 0542 | S: +44 20 3603 0540 | M: +447968161581 geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com -Original Message- From: Somesh Naidu [mailto:somesh.na...@citrix.com] Sent: 20 April 2015 15:38 To: users@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: RE: XenServer 6.5 - Security Groups I am running that in my lab and haven't encountered any issues. But note I may not be covering a whole lot of use cases. Any specific issues that you are facing? Somesh CloudPlatform Escalations Citrix Systems, Inc. From: Geoff Higginbottom [mailto:geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com] Sent: Monday, April 20, 2015 10:12 AM To: users@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: XenServer 6.5 - Security Groups Hi, Is anyone using XenServer 6.5 with a Basic Zone with Security Groups, and if so, are you experiencing any problems? Regards Geoff Higginbottom CTO / Cloud Architect [Description: Mail Logo Bottom Align] D: +44 20 3603 0542tel:+442036030542 | S: +44 20 3603 0540tel:
Re: Custom disk size at cloudstack UI
Vadim, No, it will only work with KVM. Should you decide to switch hypervisors, this is how you do it, edit this file on your install: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/blob/master/ui/scripts/ui-custom/instanceWizard.js#L424-437 and set var custom = to false instead of what is there. Then gzip the file (all the files are gzipped, this is how they are served by default to increase speed). HTH Lucian -- Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology! Nux! www.nux.ro - Original Message - From: Vadim Kimlaychuk vadim.kimlayc...@elion.ee To: users@cloudstack.apache.org Sent: Tuesday, 21 April, 2015 07:00:36 Subject: RE: Custom disk size at cloudstack UI Nux, I have ACS 4.5.1 RC2 and XenServer 6.5 with latest patchset. Is it possible to implement it there? Vadim. -Original Message- From: Nux! [mailto:n...@li.nux.ro] Sent: Tuesday, April 21, 2015 2:17 AM To: users@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: Custom disk size at cloudstack UI Vadim, That only works for KVM btw. On which ACS version are you? There are different methods.. Lucian -- Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology! Nux! www.nux.ro - Original Message - From: Vadim Kimlaychuk vadim.kimlayc...@elion.ee To: users@cloudstack.apache.org Sent: Monday, 20 April, 2015 14:38:06 Subject: Custom disk size at cloudstack UI Hello all, I remember there is an option at CS UI that opens hidden element to show input field for custom disk size at VM addition wizard. Can someone point me to the file location I need to change in order to use custom disk size functionality? Thank you, Vadim Kimlaychuk
Re: Custom disk size at cloudstack UI
There was a patch on reviewboard for initial XenServer root resize functionality, but it was never merged or followed up. -- Erik On Tue, Apr 21, 2015 at 8:00 AM, Vadim Kimlaychuk vadim.kimlayc...@elion.ee wrote: Nux, I have ACS 4.5.1 RC2 and XenServer 6.5 with latest patchset. Is it possible to implement it there? Vadim. -Original Message- From: Nux! [mailto:n...@li.nux.ro] Sent: Tuesday, April 21, 2015 2:17 AM To: users@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: Custom disk size at cloudstack UI Vadim, That only works for KVM btw. On which ACS version are you? There are different methods.. Lucian -- Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology! Nux! www.nux.ro - Original Message - From: Vadim Kimlaychuk vadim.kimlayc...@elion.ee To: users@cloudstack.apache.org Sent: Monday, 20 April, 2015 14:38:06 Subject: Custom disk size at cloudstack UI Hello all, I remember there is an option at CS UI that opens hidden element to show input field for custom disk size at VM addition wizard. Can someone point me to the file location I need to change in order to use custom disk size functionality? Thank you, Vadim Kimlaychuk
Re: Change Network Service Offering
Hi Andrija, Thank you Yes, Trying to Change 'EXISTING GUEST' Network - which is not giving 'EDIT' option. Changed the Network Offering ID in networks table 'network_offering_id'. (The new Offering ID) Its working Fine. However, if tried to changing for 'HA Router' option, its giving below message - though Public Network is defined. * Log 2015-04-21 12:11:45,903 ERROR [c.c.n.r.VirtualNetworkApplianceManagerImpl] (Job-Executor-48:ctx-5b1aa750 ctx-063468f9) Didn't support redundant virtual router without public network! Thanks.. On Tue, Apr 21, 2015 at 10:56 AM, Koushik Das koushik@citrix.com wrote: For getting compatible offering, the following properties are compared: - It shouldn't be a system offering - It should be in enabled state - Guest type, Traffic type and Specify vlan properties should be same as existing offering -Original Message- From: Sanjeev N [mailto:sanj...@apache.org] Sent: Tuesday, 21 April 2015 10:38 To: users@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: Change Network Service Offering It is possible to change the network offering for existing guest network as well from UI/API. On Mon, Apr 20, 2015 at 1:25 PM, Andrija Panic andrija.pa...@gmail.com wrote: Please let me know if you manage to change service offering for EXISTING GUEST network - this was NOT possible/supported some release ago - I had to manually, change offering ID, in the network table (particular guest network - I changed network_offering_id to point to new network offering - I added some additional services, beside already exsting ones on current network offering). thx On 20 April 2015 at 08:16, Koushik Das koushik@citrix.com wrote: For changing network offering you need to go to the network list view in UI. Select the network that you want to edit and then change the offering. Also for getting a list of compatible network offerings to update to, run listNetworkOfferings API passing the network id as shown below http://localhost:8080/client/api?command=listNetworkOfferingsnetworki d=50361114-2058-4122-acb2-ea7b10e9eadfresponse=jsonsessionkey=%2BBkt 5J81vZiZ2fCzJX6QhT9Qcjk%3D_=1429509086198 -Koushik -Original Message- From: James Scott [mailto:james59sc...@gmail.com] Sent: Monday, 20 April 2015 8:18 To: users@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Change Network Service Offering Hi As per the cloudstack Documentation, while trying to 'Change Network Service Offering' for Guest Network, 'Edit' Option supposed to be there in CloudStack Console, but its not appearing. Can we change that by editing in Database vminstance table. Also if we want to delete and recreate also, Delete Network Option is also not working, - with below message in Log File. ***Log Message WARN [o.a.c.e.o.NetworkOrchestrator] (Job-Executor-22:ctx-68b621b5 ctx-3835f973) Can't delete the network, not all user vms are expunged. Vm VM[User|testvm1] is in Stopped state *** Is this known issue, In fact there were many VMs in 'Expunging' Changed manually to 'Destroyed', still could not delete the network... (CloudStack Version is 4.3.0.1) Thank you.. -- Andrija Panić
RE: XenServer 6.5 - Security Groups
@Tim - this was a fresh install of both ACS 4.5 and XenServer 6.5 @Koushik - /etc/sysctl.conf was correctly configured, and Linux Bridge was enabled etc FYI we have now performed a code review and cannot see any differences between 4.4. and 4.5 relating to Security Groups, so the current thinking is its related to XenServer 6.5 Regards Geoff Higginbottom D: +44 20 3603 0542 | S: +44 20 3603 0540 | M: +447968161581 geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com -Original Message- From: Koushik Das [mailto:koushik@citrix.com] Sent: 21 April 2015 05:26 To: users@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: XenServer 6.5 - Security Groups What is the output of cat /etc/sysctl.conf? Update it as per http://cloudstack-installation.readthedocs.org/en/latest/hypervisor/xenserver.html. If there was an upgrade from XS 6.2 to XS 6.5, then changes to sysctl.conf is not persisted. On 21-Apr-2015, at 6:24 AM, Tim Mackey tmac...@gmail.com wrote: Geoff, was this a fresh install of both XenServer and CloudStack, or was there any post install steps or upgrades? I'm thinking of setting this up and tracing things tomorrow. Might be good to get your logs to compare against what I see. On Apr 20, 2015 3:24 PM, Geoff Higginbottom geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com wrote: FYI we have just re-deployed the environment using ACS 4.4.3 and XenServer 6.2 and now it is all working as expected. We now need to work out if the problem is with ACS 4.5.1 or XenServer 6.5 Regards Geoff Higginbottom D: +44 20 3603 0542 | S: +44 20 3603 0540 | M: +447968161581 geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com -Original Message- From: Geoff Higginbottom [mailto:geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com] Sent: 20 April 2015 17:52 To: users@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: RE: XenServer 6.5 - Security Groups Many thank Somesh Regards Geoff Higginbottom D: +44 20 3603 0542 | S: +44 20 3603 0540 | M: +447968161581 geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com -Original Message- From: Somesh Naidu [mailto:somesh.na...@citrix.com] Sent: 20 April 2015 15:55 To: users@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: RE: XenServer 6.5 - Security Groups I am running 4.5.0. I probably don't use my lab setup that often to encounter these inconsistencies. I will look for any XS hotfixes that have fixes around this area and let you know if I find one. Somesh CloudPlatform Escalations Citrix Systems, Inc. -Original Message- From: Geoff Higginbottom [mailto:geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com] Sent: Monday, April 20, 2015 10:42 AM To: users@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: RE: XenServer 6.5 - Security Groups We are currently testing a 4.5.1 CloudStack deployment with XenServer 6.5 and the Security Groups are very temperamental. Sometimes they allow traffic, sometimes they block it. Lots of errors in the cloud.log file on the XenServer saying failed to update iptables etc Regards Geoff Higginbottom D: +44 20 3603 0542 | S: +44 20 3603 0540 | M: +447968161581 geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com -Original Message- From: Somesh Naidu [mailto:somesh.na...@citrix.com] Sent: 20 April 2015 15:38 To: users@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: RE: XenServer 6.5 - Security Groups I am running that in my lab and haven't encountered any issues. But note I may not be covering a whole lot of use cases. Any specific issues that you are facing? Somesh CloudPlatform Escalations Citrix Systems, Inc. From: Geoff Higginbottom [mailto:geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com] Sent: Monday, April 20, 2015 10:12 AM To: users@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: XenServer 6.5 - Security Groups Hi, Is anyone using XenServer 6.5 with a Basic Zone with Security Groups, and if so, are you experiencing any problems? Regards Geoff Higginbottom CTO / Cloud Architect [Description: Mail Logo Bottom Align] D: +44 20 3603 0542tel:+442036030542 | S: +44 20 3603 0540tel: +442036030540 | M: +447968161581tel:+447968161581 geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.commailto:geoff.higginbottom@shapeblue. com | http://secure-web.cisco.com/1_m6FCDbSUBvddH6wuttV8bB9VyxT7_ZrQdTyy8rP 6zdZKcxYpIktkHNIjZklPdlONoacLb2wS34ty66n-dfvn7WNlvJGXbkgF-rfzXJIBVgky V1bWAuhg1ncLBIz0-ryRfTsoRfwGBsEIt25u879S1c92XJ8aaph3rzYIY6Uiu8jaw0-Pb MR0566HUKmboL-/http%3A%2F%2Fwww.shapeblue.com htp://http:/ secure-web.cisco.com/1wlSAn7D75G6NWQjnyhpieSqjDnAwYRwKZrJ72dxbEczCABP jXADRKyn6yB7bVLg9qX8BOLiQhHMSkV1rTaJ3hvk6hQ4ZzHbyevQP48d5wh6D6YO3kcvr 3rOn_PWYrsvxVV9sr6C6aGf_HdUQ3FT_1PNOgdKuZ9jugNdc1URHALWNa7pbbFucbfGdv ls3-lSD/http%3A%2F%2Fwww.shapeblue.com%2F | Twitter:@cloudstackguruhttps://twitter.com/#!/cloudstackguru ShapeBlue Ltd, 53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London, WC2N 4HS Find out more about ShapeBlue and our range of CloudStack related services IaaS Cloud Design Build http://secure-web.cisco.com/1ELd3cItcRBs-I31ofdP3jOF-t5vDpGEXoTGIusTh WjIMyrHdvguDFWxEKII1DpOPXKDDDImob8MuTMkIOh0DfliYEz52VWpOigayNR-6cF6Dz
RE: Custom disk size at cloudstack UI
Nux, I have ACS 4.5.1 RC2 and XenServer 6.5 with latest patchset. Is it possible to implement it there? Vadim. -Original Message- From: Nux! [mailto:n...@li.nux.ro] Sent: Tuesday, April 21, 2015 2:17 AM To: users@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: Custom disk size at cloudstack UI Vadim, That only works for KVM btw. On which ACS version are you? There are different methods.. Lucian -- Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology! Nux! www.nux.ro - Original Message - From: Vadim Kimlaychuk vadim.kimlayc...@elion.ee To: users@cloudstack.apache.org Sent: Monday, 20 April, 2015 14:38:06 Subject: Custom disk size at cloudstack UI Hello all, I remember there is an option at CS UI that opens hidden element to show input field for custom disk size at VM addition wizard. Can someone point me to the file location I need to change in order to use custom disk size functionality? Thank you, Vadim Kimlaychuk
Netwok offerings
Hi all, Need you advice regarding network offers. I have ACS with advanced networking implemented. VPC works fine. But probably not all clients need to have VPC. How can I offer public IP address from IP pool (shared?) without creating VPC ?? For example client just need 1 VM with public IP address and that’s it. Vadim Kimlaychuk P.S. I use VLAN isolation method for all the networks.
RE: Netwok offerings
Hi Vadim, You can use the 'Shared Network' offering for this, and assign a Public IP range. Just be aware that if you are using different NICs on your Hypervisors for Public and Guest traffic, the Shared Network is still treated as Guest traffic so you need to ensure the VLAN you assign to the Shared Network is mapped to the Guest NIC etc Regards Geoff Higginbottom D: +44 20 3603 0542 | S: +44 20 3603 0540 | M: +447968161581 geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com -Original Message- From: Vadim Kimlaychuk [mailto:vadim.kimlayc...@elion.ee] Sent: 21 April 2015 07:07 To: users@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Netwok offerings Hi all, Need you advice regarding network offers. I have ACS with advanced networking implemented. VPC works fine. But probably not all clients need to have VPC. How can I offer public IP address from IP pool (shared?) without creating VPC ?? For example client just need 1 VM with public IP address and that’s it. Vadim Kimlaychuk P.S. I use VLAN isolation method for all the networks. Find out more about ShapeBlue and our range of CloudStack related services IaaS Cloud Design Buildhttp://shapeblue.com/iaas-cloud-design-and-build// CSForge – rapid IaaS deployment frameworkhttp://shapeblue.com/csforge/ CloudStack Consultinghttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-consultancy/ CloudStack Software Engineeringhttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-software-engineering/ CloudStack Infrastructure Supporthttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-infrastructure-support/ CloudStack Bootcamp Training Courseshttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/ This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any views or opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Shape Blue Ltd or related companies. If you are not the intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any action based upon its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please contact the sender if you believe you have received this email in error. Shape Blue Ltd is a company incorporated in England Wales. ShapeBlue Services India LLP is a company incorporated in India and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. Shape Blue Brasil Consultoria Ltda is a company incorporated in Brasil and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue SA Pty Ltd is a company registered by The Republic of South Africa and is traded under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue is a registered trademark.
Re: XenServer 6.5 - Security Groups
Geoff, I just went through the changelog for ipset, and its a pretty safe bet that's where the problems are. In XenServer 6.2, ipset is version 4.5 while XenServer 6.5 uses ipset version 6.11. With version 5, upstream did a major rewrite of ipset. iptables also changed, but it's not as dramatic. I'm going to try and build with Rohit's change and test tonight or tomorrow. -tim On Tue, Apr 21, 2015 at 2:41 AM, Abhinandan Prateek abhinandan.prat...@shapeblue.com wrote: The security groups are working but with errors. All the recommended settings are in place. In the log files there are many delete failures like: Failed to delete rule log file /var/run/cloud/i-2-4-VM.ip 10.51.212.24-cloud.log:2015-04-17 11:45:08DEBUG [root] Ignoring failure to delete rules for vm i-2-4-VM 10.51.212.24-cloud.log:2015-04-17 11:45:08DEBUG [root] Ignoring failure to delete rules for vm i-2-4-VM 10.51.212.24-cloud.log:2015-04-17 11:45:09DEBUG [root] Ignoring failure to delete ebtables chain for vm i-2-4-VM 10.51.212.24-cloud.log:2015-04-17 11:45:09DEBUG [root] Creating ipset chain i-2-4-VM 10.51.212.24-cloud.log:2015-04-17 11:45:09DEBUG [root] Writing log to /var/run/cloud/i-2-4-VM.log 10.51.212.24-cloud.log:2015-04-17 11:45:09DEBUG [root] Programmed default rules for vm i-2-4-VM 10.51.212.24-cloud.log:2015-04-17 11:45:09DEBUG [root] No change in default info set of vm i-2-4-VM 10.51.212.24-cloud.log:2015-04-17 11:45:09DEBUG [root] Seqno increased from -1 to 17: reprogamming ingress rules for vm i-2-4-VM 10.51.212.24-cloud.log:2015-04-17 11:45:09DEBUG [root] Programming network rules for vm i-2-4-VM seqno=17 numrules=3 signature=fd07c7713376d8906fb71eb8328224ca guestIp=10.170.20.61, update iptables, reason=seqno_change_or_sig_change 10.51.212.24-cloud.log:2015-04-17 11:45:09DEBUG [root] ['iptables', '-I', 'i-2-4-VM', '-p', 'icmp', '--icmp-type', 'any', '-j', 'ACCEPT'] 10.51.212.24-cloud.log:2015-04-17 11:45:09DEBUG [root] ipset chain already existsi-2-4-VM_tcp_22_22 Looks like due to delete failure the subsequent rule change fails to apply ? -abhi On 21-Apr-2015, at 9:56 am, Koushik Das koushik@citrix.com wrote: What is the output of cat /etc/sysctl.conf? Update it as per http://cloudstack-installation.readthedocs.org/en/latest/hypervisor/xenserver.html. If there was an upgrade from XS 6.2 to XS 6.5, then changes to sysctl.conf is not persisted. On 21-Apr-2015, at 6:24 AM, Tim Mackey tmac...@gmail.com wrote: Geoff, was this a fresh install of both XenServer and CloudStack, or was there any post install steps or upgrades? I'm thinking of setting this up and tracing things tomorrow. Might be good to get your logs to compare against what I see. On Apr 20, 2015 3:24 PM, Geoff Higginbottom geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com wrote: FYI we have just re-deployed the environment using ACS 4.4.3 and XenServer 6.2 and now it is all working as expected. We now need to work out if the problem is with ACS 4.5.1 or XenServer 6.5 Regards Geoff Higginbottom D: +44 20 3603 0542 | S: +44 20 3603 0540 | M: +447968161581 geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com -Original Message- From: Geoff Higginbottom [mailto:geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com] Sent: 20 April 2015 17:52 To: users@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: RE: XenServer 6.5 - Security Groups Many thank Somesh Regards Geoff Higginbottom D: +44 20 3603 0542 | S: +44 20 3603 0540 | M: +447968161581 geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com -Original Message- From: Somesh Naidu [mailto:somesh.na...@citrix.com] Sent: 20 April 2015 15:55 To: users@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: RE: XenServer 6.5 - Security Groups I am running 4.5.0. I probably don't use my lab setup that often to encounter these inconsistencies. I will look for any XS hotfixes that have fixes around this area and let you know if I find one. Somesh CloudPlatform Escalations Citrix Systems, Inc. -Original Message- From: Geoff Higginbottom [mailto:geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com] Sent: Monday, April 20, 2015 10:42 AM To: users@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: RE: XenServer 6.5 - Security Groups We are currently testing a 4.5.1 CloudStack deployment with XenServer 6.5 and the Security Groups are very temperamental. Sometimes they allow traffic, sometimes they block it. Lots of errors in the cloud.log file on the XenServer saying failed to update iptables etc Regards Geoff Higginbottom D: +44 20 3603 0542 | S: +44 20 3603 0540 | M: +447968161581 geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com -Original Message- From: Somesh Naidu [mailto:somesh.na...@citrix.com] Sent: 20 April 2015 15:38 To: users@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: RE: XenServer 6.5 - Security Groups I am running that in my lab and haven't encountered any issues. But note I may not be covering a whole
root password for hosts: needed past setup?
Hi, When adding a host, the webUI asks for a username and password to connect to the new host. Is this only used for the initial setup over ssh, or is this used later on as well? We tend to disable passwords as much as possible, in favour of ssh keys, and I was wondering if I could safely remove the passwords once the Host has gone through the initial setup? Regards, Frank Louwers
Re: AW: cpu overprovisioning
I have not looked at the code, but that seems odd. Restarting VMs instances to update the resource usage/resource availability when changing the overprovisioning factor. On Tue, Apr 21, 2015 at 12:51 PM, S. Brüseke - proIO GmbH s.brues...@proio.com wrote: Please try to stop and start the vm. Maybe reboot is not working here. You should start to see more free CPU after the first vm. Mit freundlichen Grüßen / With kind regards, Swen Brüseke -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: Ugo Vasi [mailto:ugo.v...@procne.it] Gesendet: Dienstag, 21. April 2015 16:40 An: users@cloudstack.apache.org Betreff: Re: AW: cpu overprovisioning Hi Swen, I try rebboting 2 vm but the amount of cpu MHz is not changed. Do I have to restart all vm before you see a change? Il 21/04/2015 16:16, S. Brüseke - proIO GmbH ha scritto: This is because the factor of overprovisioning is attached to the instance too! And this factor is only changing after rebooting the instance. So after a change of cpu.overprovisioning.factor you need to reboot all instances on this cluster which were running before this change was made. Mit freundlichen Grüßen / With kind regards, Swen Brüseke -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: Ugo Vasi [mailto:ugo.v...@procne.it] Gesendet: Dienstag, 21. April 2015 16:06 An: users@cloudstack.apache.org Betreff: Re: cpu overprovisioning If I change the over-provisioning ratio in cluster-relative settings (infrastructure-cluser-cluster-name-settings) the dashboard show the sum of real GHz the overprovisioned amount of GHz (324GHz) as aspected, but after a while also the sum of Ghz is multiplied by the same factor making it unnecessary... Il 21/04/2015 15:26, Bharat Kumar ha scritto: In case of cloudstack, cpu capacity for host is total of cpus * no of Ghz * overporvisoning. total capacity = sum of capacities of individual hosts. Thanks, Bharat. On 21-Apr-2015, at 6:49 pm, Abhinandan Prateek abhinandan.prat...@shapeblue.com wrote: Available CPU will be 3 times the actual CPU when over provisioned by 3. The UI not showing the over provisioned value seems like a bug. -abhi On 21-Apr-2015, at 6:34 pm, Ugo Vasi ugo.v...@procne.it wrote: Hi all, we have a cluster of three machines with 16 CPU at 2.2GHz each and we have set a cpu-overprovizioning to 3. I would expect that the CPU system capacity of the dashboard appear with the sum of megahertz CPUs multiplied by three instead I get the real sum (108MHz). I do not understand if this overprovisioning allows me to allocate more MHz of real ones asthe documentation say since in reality the virtual machines occupy on average only 20% of the computing power. thanks in advance -- U g o V a s iugo.v...@procne.it P r o c n e s.r.l) via Cotonificio 45 33010 Tavagnacco IT phone: +390432486523 fax: +390432486523 Le informazioni contenute in questo messaggio sono riservate e confidenziali ed è vietata la diffusione in qualunque modo eseguita. Qualora Lei non fosse la persona a cui il presente messaggio è destinato, La invitiamo ad eliminarlo e a non leggerlo, dandocene gentilmente comunicazione. Per qualsiasi informazione si prega di contattare supp...@procne.it . Rif. D.L. 196/2003 Find out more about ShapeBlue and our range of CloudStack related services IaaS Cloud Design Buildhttp://secure-web.cisco.com/1Yol7cn0c4CnDObcpSirV3DCPZ0WVdvOa3L hGNjqR1LC8fdUx8eCLTnMMSoshd9HpKAnV6UPQ_yMd3M-1eZw2Ta-m7j5KgANh1cCgIkU g7gUvZUUMIkYZDZDpYP9IDOTuw6o3kuFAtJGiF0j7g8WWr6r9HIr7CqwJi047V_38MGrr r_r5JkLvVUoDdjYuhuBW/http%3A%2F%2Fshapeblue.com%2Fiaas-cloud-design-a nd-build%2F%2F CSForge - rapid IaaS deployment frameworkhttp://secure-web.cisco.com/1QG_8HfqAJxyrN85oTEHIYNcbRgpmjr Akp0COA-UIvjKFK3VDTqCkj9wp1e8W2JML6G56lRvuJpQMr5faxHOlQGVsy3eWivku7VX STR7Z_reGWbZS3mVJGbFxehTWTUAsA_HOfZ_i-dHdhIuYwCSXyx0PRQcIdyEE51ZlHghI wpl_CcVK4rj2EVlq5FWSNjbo/http%3A%2F%2Fshapeblue.com%2Fcsforge%2F CloudStack Consultinghttp://secure-web.cisco.com/1Jd9xC30lbTOK4Yz24hsK-SYyFxcaJ 15JHz5Aat3Lyd0qe4l_RGA3YuQAxdRlfgsKaT6hI61qwykCBNqiJRWwlaPIeK_FNJxaJt TYZ9o6c9gUZUI1GDDw2fGIesLOAjS5FnkfMjK4oqpmjkwKOCLxeXnBDDSoZhjQjyBB65K 27drcx_ll0lovUbqvBoz1HRfM/http%3A%2F%2Fshapeblue.com%2Fcloudstack-con sultancy%2F CloudStack Software Engineeringhttp://secure-web.cisco.com/10UUubQoT9nA8gFa_q8Qn0och7aMN dFTHV-Yar0Ga9h9N4I3YNAockHpCCMMiqhnaECX7ZcolpDZ0IWds3ca9SDAQ_9hoGadj_ YhjpPvW95NwJlv15UDNFNs8r99wke8pQl6BKjgzv94SQuWHueziP1J7X8G7uzAbyj7qqQ IjwV8qqxyV81xYENQyXC13qHt9/http%3A%2F%2Fshapeblue.com%2Fcloudstack-so ftware-engineering%2F CloudStack Infrastructure Supporthttp://secure-web.cisco.com/1tHfpu6yxqCTFv4ED5hd1IzUqlDUAasw9 gn30YT3ucOvb0PNffUKzHjrKXCpTie0_dZ2a1Veui99C8Qp-p9CiKkobjVQ7pQow2X2A6 AYXKH5HwcPQ4zvZuLr30h5QBdE3MjtkFm_PM2JKk7WRAhtnukS0nvUJnIY1CzNyvezE5Y Vmd8PpcV-eZRBptj4Mv_5i/http%3A%2F%2Fshapeblue.com%2Fcloudstack-infras
cpu overprovisioning
Hi all, we have a cluster of three machines with 16 CPU at 2.2GHz each and we have set a cpu-overprovizioning to 3. I would expect that the CPU system capacity of the dashboard appear with the sum of megahertz CPUs multiplied by three instead I get the real sum (108MHz). I do not understand if this overprovisioning allows me to allocate more MHz of real ones asthe documentation say since in reality the virtual machines occupy on average only 20% of the computing power. thanks in advance -- U g o V a s iugo.v...@procne.it P r o c n e s.r.l) via Cotonificio 45 33010 Tavagnacco IT phone: +390432486523 fax: +390432486523 Le informazioni contenute in questo messaggio sono riservate e confidenziali ed è vietata la diffusione in qualunque modo eseguita. Qualora Lei non fosse la persona a cui il presente messaggio è destinato, La invitiamo ad eliminarlo e a non leggerlo, dandocene gentilmente comunicazione. Per qualsiasi informazione si prega di contattare supp...@procne.it . Rif. D.L. 196/2003
Re: cpu overprovisioning
Available CPU will be 3 times the actual CPU when over provisioned by 3. The UI not showing the over provisioned value seems like a bug. -abhi On 21-Apr-2015, at 6:34 pm, Ugo Vasi ugo.v...@procne.it wrote: Hi all, we have a cluster of three machines with 16 CPU at 2.2GHz each and we have set a cpu-overprovizioning to 3. I would expect that the CPU system capacity of the dashboard appear with the sum of megahertz CPUs multiplied by three instead I get the real sum (108MHz). I do not understand if this overprovisioning allows me to allocate more MHz of real ones asthe documentation say since in reality the virtual machines occupy on average only 20% of the computing power. thanks in advance -- U g o V a s iugo.v...@procne.it P r o c n e s.r.l) via Cotonificio 45 33010 Tavagnacco IT phone: +390432486523 fax: +390432486523 Le informazioni contenute in questo messaggio sono riservate e confidenziali ed è vietata la diffusione in qualunque modo eseguita. Qualora Lei non fosse la persona a cui il presente messaggio è destinato, La invitiamo ad eliminarlo e a non leggerlo, dandocene gentilmente comunicazione. Per qualsiasi informazione si prega di contattare supp...@procne.it . Rif. D.L. 196/2003 Find out more about ShapeBlue and our range of CloudStack related services IaaS Cloud Design Buildhttp://shapeblue.com/iaas-cloud-design-and-build// CSForge – rapid IaaS deployment frameworkhttp://shapeblue.com/csforge/ CloudStack Consultinghttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-consultancy/ CloudStack Software Engineeringhttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-software-engineering/ CloudStack Infrastructure Supporthttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-infrastructure-support/ CloudStack Bootcamp Training Courseshttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/ This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any views or opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Shape Blue Ltd or related companies. If you are not the intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any action based upon its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please contact the sender if you believe you have received this email in error. Shape Blue Ltd is a company incorporated in England Wales. ShapeBlue Services India LLP is a company incorporated in India and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. Shape Blue Brasil Consultoria Ltda is a company incorporated in Brasil and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue SA Pty Ltd is a company registered by The Republic of South Africa and is traded under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue is a registered trademark.
Re: CoreOS/Docker - a new blog series
Hi Phillip, Many thanks for getting back to me. I managed to get it working by following this guide yesterday (might be useful for someone else): http://help.ninefold.com/servers/how_to_create_a_coreos_server/ I put the user-data into a file with my generated token and then convert it to base64 with: base64 -w 0 coreos-userdata Server was then launched with cloudmonkey: deploy virtualmachine -userdata=base64stringFromAbove -name core01 -(other params for zone, template etc) deploy virtualmachine -userdata=base64stringFromAbove -name core02 -(other params for zone, template etc) etc.. Just need to script this now to automatically create farms. Seems to work fine! One piece of good advice seems to be that if you are setting up a CoreOS cluster using fleet, if any of the VMs fail to deploy completely, the best thing is to get a fresh discovery token and re-deploy all of the VMs. It does not seem to be easy to clear a 'failed' record from the discovery database. I found this as well, great to hear it wasn't just me. Cheers! On Tue, Apr 21, 2015 at 1:35 AM, Phillip Kent phillip.k...@xmlsoup.com wrote: Hi cs user, I have not so far had any issues with using discovery and passing the discovery URL via userdata. If you are using a 'Private with Gateway Services' network this simple 'cloud-config' file should work: https://github.com/Interoute/CoreOS-and-VDC/blob/master/cloud-config-template-simple And the new VM will pull its config from the virtual router. My CS setup uses Advanced Networking, so I don't know how this goes with the Basic networking/Security groups. One piece of good advice seems to be that if you are setting up a CoreOS cluster using fleet, if any of the VMs fail to deploy completely, the best thing is to get a fresh discovery token and re-deploy all of the VMs. It does not seem to be easy to clear a 'failed' record from the discovery database. BTW, I will be publishing soon a couple more blogs on CoreOS clusters and fleet. Keep an eye on: http://cloudstore.interoute.com/main/knowledge-centre/blog - Phillip -- Forwarded message -- From: cs user acldstk...@gmail.com To: users@cloudstack.apache.org Cc: Date: Mon, 20 Apr 2015 10:07:54 +0100 Subject: Ah, I managed to get the sshkeypair working with this template! :) http://dl.openvm.eu/cloudstack/coreos/x86_64/ Just need to get discovery working now. On Mon, Apr 20, 2015 at 8:58 AM, cs user acldstk...@gmail.com wrote: Hi All, Thanks for the blog post Phillip, very impressive! :) I've had a play with coreos/cloudstack myself, but it's been pretty manual and the SSH public key has been baked into the template. I guess I'm missing something very simple here, but how is everyone managing to set the following via the dhcp router metadata? ssh_authorized_keys: - ssh-rsa B3NzaC1yc2EDAQABAAABAQC0g+ZTxC7weoIJLUafOgrm+h. Are you creating a script on the coreos template which curls against the router the first time it boots? Cheers!
Re: CoreOS/Docker - a new blog series
Did a presentation on cloud-init at CloudStackDays in Austin last week, I've covered use of user-data with CoreOS. http://www.slideshare.net/CloudOps2005/cloudops-cloudstack-days-austin-april-2015 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IV-vTL4fjHE On Mon, Apr 20, 2015 at 8:35 PM, Phillip Kent phillip.k...@xmlsoup.com wrote: Hi cs user, I have not so far had any issues with using discovery and passing the discovery URL via userdata. If you are using a 'Private with Gateway Services' network this simple 'cloud-config' file should work: https://github.com/Interoute/CoreOS-and-VDC/blob/master/cloud-config-template-simple And the new VM will pull its config from the virtual router. My CS setup uses Advanced Networking, so I don't know how this goes with the Basic networking/Security groups. One piece of good advice seems to be that if you are setting up a CoreOS cluster using fleet, if any of the VMs fail to deploy completely, the best thing is to get a fresh discovery token and re-deploy all of the VMs. It does not seem to be easy to clear a 'failed' record from the discovery database. BTW, I will be publishing soon a couple more blogs on CoreOS clusters and fleet. Keep an eye on: http://cloudstore.interoute.com/main/knowledge-centre/blog - Phillip -- Forwarded message -- From: cs user acldstk...@gmail.com To: users@cloudstack.apache.org Cc: Date: Mon, 20 Apr 2015 10:07:54 +0100 Subject: Ah, I managed to get the sshkeypair working with this template! :) http://dl.openvm.eu/cloudstack/coreos/x86_64/ Just need to get discovery working now. On Mon, Apr 20, 2015 at 8:58 AM, cs user acldstk...@gmail.com wrote: Hi All, Thanks for the blog post Phillip, very impressive! :) I've had a play with coreos/cloudstack myself, but it's been pretty manual and the SSH public key has been baked into the template. I guess I'm missing something very simple here, but how is everyone managing to set the following via the dhcp router metadata? ssh_authorized_keys: - ssh-rsa B3NzaC1yc2EDAQABAAABAQC0g+ZTxC7weoIJLUafOgrm+h. Are you creating a script on the coreos template which curls against the router the first time it boots? Cheers!
RE: Custom disk size at cloudstack UI
Thank you Nux! I will stay as is. It is too complicated right now to change hypervisor Regards, Vadim. -Original Message- From: Nux! [mailto:n...@li.nux.ro] Sent: Tuesday, April 21, 2015 9:34 AM To: users@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: Custom disk size at cloudstack UI Vadim, No, it will only work with KVM. Should you decide to switch hypervisors, this is how you do it, edit this file on your install: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/blob/master/ui/scripts/ui-custom/instanceWizard.js#L424-437 and set var custom = to false instead of what is there. Then gzip the file (all the files are gzipped, this is how they are served by default to increase speed). HTH Lucian -- Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology! Nux! www.nux.ro - Original Message - From: Vadim Kimlaychuk vadim.kimlayc...@elion.ee To: users@cloudstack.apache.org Sent: Tuesday, 21 April, 2015 07:00:36 Subject: RE: Custom disk size at cloudstack UI Nux, I have ACS 4.5.1 RC2 and XenServer 6.5 with latest patchset. Is it possible to implement it there? Vadim. -Original Message- From: Nux! [mailto:n...@li.nux.ro] Sent: Tuesday, April 21, 2015 2:17 AM To: users@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: Custom disk size at cloudstack UI Vadim, That only works for KVM btw. On which ACS version are you? There are different methods.. Lucian -- Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology! Nux! www.nux.ro - Original Message - From: Vadim Kimlaychuk vadim.kimlayc...@elion.ee To: users@cloudstack.apache.org Sent: Monday, 20 April, 2015 14:38:06 Subject: Custom disk size at cloudstack UI Hello all, I remember there is an option at CS UI that opens hidden element to show input field for custom disk size at VM addition wizard. Can someone point me to the file location I need to change in order to use custom disk size functionality? Thank you, Vadim Kimlaychuk
RE: Netwok offerings
Geoff, I am using one NIC (bond) for public and guest traffic. Public is tagged as 500, guest VLANs 600-632. But I am still a bit lost in details. Assume I have B-class public network: 192.2.1.0/24 with GW at my router - 192.2.1.1. I would like to have 32 IP dedicated to VPC and 128 dedicated to shared public IP pool. VPC IP-s are taken from admin public network defined during set-up. So I have. 1. VPC net -- tag:500, 192.2.1.0/27, gw 192.2.1.1, range 2-31 usable IPs 2. Shared public IP range -- tag:500, 192.2.1.32/25, gw 192.2.1.33, range 34-126 usable But this will not work, because IP ranges overlap. How do I partition? The other question -- what device will play gw - 192.2.1.33 role ? Will it be cloudstack with VR or should I register it manually on external router ? Thank you in advance, Vadim. -Original Message- From: Geoff Higginbottom [mailto:geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com] Sent: Tuesday, April 21, 2015 9:13 AM To: users@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: RE: Netwok offerings Hi Vadim, You can use the 'Shared Network' offering for this, and assign a Public IP range. Just be aware that if you are using different NICs on your Hypervisors for Public and Guest traffic, the Shared Network is still treated as Guest traffic so you need to ensure the VLAN you assign to the Shared Network is mapped to the Guest NIC etc Regards Geoff Higginbottom D: +44 20 3603 0542 | S: +44 20 3603 0540 | M: +447968161581 geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com -Original Message- From: Vadim Kimlaychuk [mailto:vadim.kimlayc...@elion.ee] Sent: 21 April 2015 07:07 To: users@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Netwok offerings Hi all, Need you advice regarding network offers. I have ACS with advanced networking implemented. VPC works fine. But probably not all clients need to have VPC. How can I offer public IP address from IP pool (shared?) without creating VPC ?? For example client just need 1 VM with public IP address and that’s it. Vadim Kimlaychuk P.S. I use VLAN isolation method for all the networks. Find out more about ShapeBlue and our range of CloudStack related services IaaS Cloud Design Buildhttp://shapeblue.com/iaas-cloud-design-and-build// CSForge – rapid IaaS deployment frameworkhttp://shapeblue.com/csforge/ CloudStack Consultinghttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-consultancy/ CloudStack Software Engineeringhttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-software-engineering/ CloudStack Infrastructure Supporthttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-infrastructure-support/ CloudStack Bootcamp Training Courseshttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/ This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any views or opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Shape Blue Ltd or related companies. If you are not the intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any action based upon its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please contact the sender if you believe you have received this email in error. Shape Blue Ltd is a company incorporated in England Wales. ShapeBlue Services India LLP is a company incorporated in India and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. Shape Blue Brasil Consultoria Ltda is a company incorporated in Brasil and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue SA Pty Ltd is a company registered by The Republic of South Africa and is traded under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue is a registered trademark.
Re: AW: cpu overprovisioning
Hi Swen, I try rebboting 2 vm but the amount of cpu MHz is not changed. Do I have to restart all vm before you see a change? Il 21/04/2015 16:16, S. Brüseke - proIO GmbH ha scritto: This is because the factor of overprovisioning is attached to the instance too! And this factor is only changing after rebooting the instance. So after a change of cpu.overprovisioning.factor you need to reboot all instances on this cluster which were running before this change was made. Mit freundlichen Grüßen / With kind regards, Swen Brüseke -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: Ugo Vasi [mailto:ugo.v...@procne.it] Gesendet: Dienstag, 21. April 2015 16:06 An: users@cloudstack.apache.org Betreff: Re: cpu overprovisioning If I change the over-provisioning ratio in cluster-relative settings (infrastructure-cluser-cluster-name-settings) the dashboard show the sum of real GHz the overprovisioned amount of GHz (324GHz) as aspected, but after a while also the sum of Ghz is multiplied by the same factor making it unnecessary... Il 21/04/2015 15:26, Bharat Kumar ha scritto: In case of cloudstack, cpu capacity for host is total of cpus * no of Ghz * overporvisoning. total capacity = sum of capacities of individual hosts. Thanks, Bharat. On 21-Apr-2015, at 6:49 pm, Abhinandan Prateek abhinandan.prat...@shapeblue.com wrote: Available CPU will be 3 times the actual CPU when over provisioned by 3. The UI not showing the over provisioned value seems like a bug. -abhi On 21-Apr-2015, at 6:34 pm, Ugo Vasi ugo.v...@procne.it wrote: Hi all, we have a cluster of three machines with 16 CPU at 2.2GHz each and we have set a cpu-overprovizioning to 3. I would expect that the CPU system capacity of the dashboard appear with the sum of megahertz CPUs multiplied by three instead I get the real sum (108MHz). I do not understand if this overprovisioning allows me to allocate more MHz of real ones asthe documentation say since in reality the virtual machines occupy on average only 20% of the computing power. thanks in advance -- U g o V a s iugo.v...@procne.it P r o c n e s.r.l) via Cotonificio 45 33010 Tavagnacco IT phone: +390432486523 fax: +390432486523 Le informazioni contenute in questo messaggio sono riservate e confidenziali ed è vietata la diffusione in qualunque modo eseguita. Qualora Lei non fosse la persona a cui il presente messaggio è destinato, La invitiamo ad eliminarlo e a non leggerlo, dandocene gentilmente comunicazione. Per qualsiasi informazione si prega di contattare supp...@procne.it . Rif. D.L. 196/2003 Find out more about ShapeBlue and our range of CloudStack related services IaaS Cloud Design Buildhttp://secure-web.cisco.com/1Yol7cn0c4CnDObcpSirV3DCPZ0WVdvOa3L hGNjqR1LC8fdUx8eCLTnMMSoshd9HpKAnV6UPQ_yMd3M-1eZw2Ta-m7j5KgANh1cCgIkU g7gUvZUUMIkYZDZDpYP9IDOTuw6o3kuFAtJGiF0j7g8WWr6r9HIr7CqwJi047V_38MGrr r_r5JkLvVUoDdjYuhuBW/http%3A%2F%2Fshapeblue.com%2Fiaas-cloud-design-a nd-build%2F%2F CSForge - rapid IaaS deployment frameworkhttp://secure-web.cisco.com/1QG_8HfqAJxyrN85oTEHIYNcbRgpmjr Akp0COA-UIvjKFK3VDTqCkj9wp1e8W2JML6G56lRvuJpQMr5faxHOlQGVsy3eWivku7VX STR7Z_reGWbZS3mVJGbFxehTWTUAsA_HOfZ_i-dHdhIuYwCSXyx0PRQcIdyEE51ZlHghI wpl_CcVK4rj2EVlq5FWSNjbo/http%3A%2F%2Fshapeblue.com%2Fcsforge%2F CloudStack Consultinghttp://secure-web.cisco.com/1Jd9xC30lbTOK4Yz24hsK-SYyFxcaJ 15JHz5Aat3Lyd0qe4l_RGA3YuQAxdRlfgsKaT6hI61qwykCBNqiJRWwlaPIeK_FNJxaJt TYZ9o6c9gUZUI1GDDw2fGIesLOAjS5FnkfMjK4oqpmjkwKOCLxeXnBDDSoZhjQjyBB65K 27drcx_ll0lovUbqvBoz1HRfM/http%3A%2F%2Fshapeblue.com%2Fcloudstack-con sultancy%2F CloudStack Software Engineeringhttp://secure-web.cisco.com/10UUubQoT9nA8gFa_q8Qn0och7aMN dFTHV-Yar0Ga9h9N4I3YNAockHpCCMMiqhnaECX7ZcolpDZ0IWds3ca9SDAQ_9hoGadj_ YhjpPvW95NwJlv15UDNFNs8r99wke8pQl6BKjgzv94SQuWHueziP1J7X8G7uzAbyj7qqQ IjwV8qqxyV81xYENQyXC13qHt9/http%3A%2F%2Fshapeblue.com%2Fcloudstack-so ftware-engineering%2F CloudStack Infrastructure Supporthttp://secure-web.cisco.com/1tHfpu6yxqCTFv4ED5hd1IzUqlDUAasw9 gn30YT3ucOvb0PNffUKzHjrKXCpTie0_dZ2a1Veui99C8Qp-p9CiKkobjVQ7pQow2X2A6 AYXKH5HwcPQ4zvZuLr30h5QBdE3MjtkFm_PM2JKk7WRAhtnukS0nvUJnIY1CzNyvezE5Y Vmd8PpcV-eZRBptj4Mv_5i/http%3A%2F%2Fshapeblue.com%2Fcloudstack-infras tructure-support%2F CloudStack Bootcamp Training Courseshttp://secure-web.cisco.com/1x7d61M2SDzx2SvrIj9y8lD6Eepy3dddj EIFHasGDV_PPBn4EwtHVaqqdWSD1VShX_OR-DKgxqKGgB-dO7jrsSLYkWAw7UE1EeKQdH I4RW9BPnlYREiTeAcWT3YeOlfQh9EzHqk1uXnuftQxPCbewMDyEcqAzM6O-6r7R7sYuIx I6xPdCoei7JH2Bkpsljdp-/http%3A%2F%2Fshapeblue.com%2Fcloudstack-traini ng%2F This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any views or opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Shape Blue Ltd or related companies. If you are not the intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any action based upon its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please contact the sender if you
AW: cpu overprovisioning
This is because the factor of overprovisioning is attached to the instance too! And this factor is only changing after rebooting the instance. So after a change of cpu.overprovisioning.factor you need to reboot all instances on this cluster which were running before this change was made. Mit freundlichen Grüßen / With kind regards, Swen Brüseke -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: Ugo Vasi [mailto:ugo.v...@procne.it] Gesendet: Dienstag, 21. April 2015 16:06 An: users@cloudstack.apache.org Betreff: Re: cpu overprovisioning If I change the over-provisioning ratio in cluster-relative settings (infrastructure-cluser-cluster-name-settings) the dashboard show the sum of real GHz the overprovisioned amount of GHz (324GHz) as aspected, but after a while also the sum of Ghz is multiplied by the same factor making it unnecessary... Il 21/04/2015 15:26, Bharat Kumar ha scritto: In case of cloudstack, cpu capacity for host is total of cpus * no of Ghz * overporvisoning. total capacity = sum of capacities of individual hosts. Thanks, Bharat. On 21-Apr-2015, at 6:49 pm, Abhinandan Prateek abhinandan.prat...@shapeblue.com wrote: Available CPU will be 3 times the actual CPU when over provisioned by 3. The UI not showing the over provisioned value seems like a bug. -abhi On 21-Apr-2015, at 6:34 pm, Ugo Vasi ugo.v...@procne.it wrote: Hi all, we have a cluster of three machines with 16 CPU at 2.2GHz each and we have set a cpu-overprovizioning to 3. I would expect that the CPU system capacity of the dashboard appear with the sum of megahertz CPUs multiplied by three instead I get the real sum (108MHz). I do not understand if this overprovisioning allows me to allocate more MHz of real ones asthe documentation say since in reality the virtual machines occupy on average only 20% of the computing power. thanks in advance -- U g o V a s iugo.v...@procne.it P r o c n e s.r.l) via Cotonificio 45 33010 Tavagnacco IT phone: +390432486523 fax: +390432486523 Le informazioni contenute in questo messaggio sono riservate e confidenziali ed è vietata la diffusione in qualunque modo eseguita. Qualora Lei non fosse la persona a cui il presente messaggio è destinato, La invitiamo ad eliminarlo e a non leggerlo, dandocene gentilmente comunicazione. Per qualsiasi informazione si prega di contattare supp...@procne.it . Rif. D.L. 196/2003 Find out more about ShapeBlue and our range of CloudStack related services IaaS Cloud Design Buildhttp://secure-web.cisco.com/1Yol7cn0c4CnDObcpSirV3DCPZ0WVdvOa3L hGNjqR1LC8fdUx8eCLTnMMSoshd9HpKAnV6UPQ_yMd3M-1eZw2Ta-m7j5KgANh1cCgIkU g7gUvZUUMIkYZDZDpYP9IDOTuw6o3kuFAtJGiF0j7g8WWr6r9HIr7CqwJi047V_38MGrr r_r5JkLvVUoDdjYuhuBW/http%3A%2F%2Fshapeblue.com%2Fiaas-cloud-design-a nd-build%2F%2F CSForge - rapid IaaS deployment frameworkhttp://secure-web.cisco.com/1QG_8HfqAJxyrN85oTEHIYNcbRgpmjr Akp0COA-UIvjKFK3VDTqCkj9wp1e8W2JML6G56lRvuJpQMr5faxHOlQGVsy3eWivku7VX STR7Z_reGWbZS3mVJGbFxehTWTUAsA_HOfZ_i-dHdhIuYwCSXyx0PRQcIdyEE51ZlHghI wpl_CcVK4rj2EVlq5FWSNjbo/http%3A%2F%2Fshapeblue.com%2Fcsforge%2F CloudStack Consultinghttp://secure-web.cisco.com/1Jd9xC30lbTOK4Yz24hsK-SYyFxcaJ 15JHz5Aat3Lyd0qe4l_RGA3YuQAxdRlfgsKaT6hI61qwykCBNqiJRWwlaPIeK_FNJxaJt TYZ9o6c9gUZUI1GDDw2fGIesLOAjS5FnkfMjK4oqpmjkwKOCLxeXnBDDSoZhjQjyBB65K 27drcx_ll0lovUbqvBoz1HRfM/http%3A%2F%2Fshapeblue.com%2Fcloudstack-con sultancy%2F CloudStack Software Engineeringhttp://secure-web.cisco.com/10UUubQoT9nA8gFa_q8Qn0och7aMN dFTHV-Yar0Ga9h9N4I3YNAockHpCCMMiqhnaECX7ZcolpDZ0IWds3ca9SDAQ_9hoGadj_ YhjpPvW95NwJlv15UDNFNs8r99wke8pQl6BKjgzv94SQuWHueziP1J7X8G7uzAbyj7qqQ IjwV8qqxyV81xYENQyXC13qHt9/http%3A%2F%2Fshapeblue.com%2Fcloudstack-so ftware-engineering%2F CloudStack Infrastructure Supporthttp://secure-web.cisco.com/1tHfpu6yxqCTFv4ED5hd1IzUqlDUAasw9 gn30YT3ucOvb0PNffUKzHjrKXCpTie0_dZ2a1Veui99C8Qp-p9CiKkobjVQ7pQow2X2A6 AYXKH5HwcPQ4zvZuLr30h5QBdE3MjtkFm_PM2JKk7WRAhtnukS0nvUJnIY1CzNyvezE5Y Vmd8PpcV-eZRBptj4Mv_5i/http%3A%2F%2Fshapeblue.com%2Fcloudstack-infras tructure-support%2F CloudStack Bootcamp Training Courseshttp://secure-web.cisco.com/1x7d61M2SDzx2SvrIj9y8lD6Eepy3dddj EIFHasGDV_PPBn4EwtHVaqqdWSD1VShX_OR-DKgxqKGgB-dO7jrsSLYkWAw7UE1EeKQdH I4RW9BPnlYREiTeAcWT3YeOlfQh9EzHqk1uXnuftQxPCbewMDyEcqAzM6O-6r7R7sYuIx I6xPdCoei7JH2Bkpsljdp-/http%3A%2F%2Fshapeblue.com%2Fcloudstack-traini ng%2F This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any views or opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Shape Blue Ltd or related companies. If you are not the intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any action based upon its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please contact the sender if you believe you have received this email in error. Shape Blue Ltd is a company incorporated in England
Re: cpu overprovisioning
When you say instance, did you mean CS web application instance? On Tue, Apr 21, 2015 at 11:16 AM, S. Brüseke - proIO GmbH s.brues...@proio.com wrote: This is because the factor of overprovisioning is attached to the instance too! And this factor is only changing after rebooting the instance. So after a change of cpu.overprovisioning.factor you need to reboot all instances on this cluster which were running before this change was made. Mit freundlichen Grüßen / With kind regards, Swen Brüseke -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: Ugo Vasi [mailto:ugo.v...@procne.it] Gesendet: Dienstag, 21. April 2015 16:06 An: users@cloudstack.apache.org Betreff: Re: cpu overprovisioning If I change the over-provisioning ratio in cluster-relative settings (infrastructure-cluser-cluster-name-settings) the dashboard show the sum of real GHz the overprovisioned amount of GHz (324GHz) as aspected, but after a while also the sum of Ghz is multiplied by the same factor making it unnecessary... Il 21/04/2015 15:26, Bharat Kumar ha scritto: In case of cloudstack, cpu capacity for host is total of cpus * no of Ghz * overporvisoning. total capacity = sum of capacities of individual hosts. Thanks, Bharat. On 21-Apr-2015, at 6:49 pm, Abhinandan Prateek abhinandan.prat...@shapeblue.com wrote: Available CPU will be 3 times the actual CPU when over provisioned by 3. The UI not showing the over provisioned value seems like a bug. -abhi On 21-Apr-2015, at 6:34 pm, Ugo Vasi ugo.v...@procne.it wrote: Hi all, we have a cluster of three machines with 16 CPU at 2.2GHz each and we have set a cpu-overprovizioning to 3. I would expect that the CPU system capacity of the dashboard appear with the sum of megahertz CPUs multiplied by three instead I get the real sum (108MHz). I do not understand if this overprovisioning allows me to allocate more MHz of real ones asthe documentation say since in reality the virtual machines occupy on average only 20% of the computing power. thanks in advance -- U g o V a s iugo.v...@procne.it P r o c n e s.r.l) via Cotonificio 45 33010 Tavagnacco IT phone: +390432486523 fax: +390432486523 Le informazioni contenute in questo messaggio sono riservate e confidenziali ed è vietata la diffusione in qualunque modo eseguita. Qualora Lei non fosse la persona a cui il presente messaggio è destinato, La invitiamo ad eliminarlo e a non leggerlo, dandocene gentilmente comunicazione. Per qualsiasi informazione si prega di contattare supp...@procne.it . Rif. D.L. 196/2003 Find out more about ShapeBlue and our range of CloudStack related services IaaS Cloud Design Buildhttp://secure-web.cisco.com/1Yol7cn0c4CnDObcpSirV3DCPZ0WVdvOa3L hGNjqR1LC8fdUx8eCLTnMMSoshd9HpKAnV6UPQ_yMd3M-1eZw2Ta-m7j5KgANh1cCgIkU g7gUvZUUMIkYZDZDpYP9IDOTuw6o3kuFAtJGiF0j7g8WWr6r9HIr7CqwJi047V_38MGrr r_r5JkLvVUoDdjYuhuBW/http%3A%2F%2Fshapeblue.com%2Fiaas-cloud-design-a nd-build%2F%2F CSForge - rapid IaaS deployment frameworkhttp://secure-web.cisco.com/1QG_8HfqAJxyrN85oTEHIYNcbRgpmjr Akp0COA-UIvjKFK3VDTqCkj9wp1e8W2JML6G56lRvuJpQMr5faxHOlQGVsy3eWivku7VX STR7Z_reGWbZS3mVJGbFxehTWTUAsA_HOfZ_i-dHdhIuYwCSXyx0PRQcIdyEE51ZlHghI wpl_CcVK4rj2EVlq5FWSNjbo/http%3A%2F%2Fshapeblue.com%2Fcsforge%2F CloudStack Consultinghttp://secure-web.cisco.com/1Jd9xC30lbTOK4Yz24hsK-SYyFxcaJ 15JHz5Aat3Lyd0qe4l_RGA3YuQAxdRlfgsKaT6hI61qwykCBNqiJRWwlaPIeK_FNJxaJt TYZ9o6c9gUZUI1GDDw2fGIesLOAjS5FnkfMjK4oqpmjkwKOCLxeXnBDDSoZhjQjyBB65K 27drcx_ll0lovUbqvBoz1HRfM/http%3A%2F%2Fshapeblue.com%2Fcloudstack-con sultancy%2F CloudStack Software Engineeringhttp://secure-web.cisco.com/10UUubQoT9nA8gFa_q8Qn0och7aMN dFTHV-Yar0Ga9h9N4I3YNAockHpCCMMiqhnaECX7ZcolpDZ0IWds3ca9SDAQ_9hoGadj_ YhjpPvW95NwJlv15UDNFNs8r99wke8pQl6BKjgzv94SQuWHueziP1J7X8G7uzAbyj7qqQ IjwV8qqxyV81xYENQyXC13qHt9/http%3A%2F%2Fshapeblue.com%2Fcloudstack-so ftware-engineering%2F CloudStack Infrastructure Supporthttp://secure-web.cisco.com/1tHfpu6yxqCTFv4ED5hd1IzUqlDUAasw9 gn30YT3ucOvb0PNffUKzHjrKXCpTie0_dZ2a1Veui99C8Qp-p9CiKkobjVQ7pQow2X2A6 AYXKH5HwcPQ4zvZuLr30h5QBdE3MjtkFm_PM2JKk7WRAhtnukS0nvUJnIY1CzNyvezE5Y Vmd8PpcV-eZRBptj4Mv_5i/http%3A%2F%2Fshapeblue.com%2Fcloudstack-infras tructure-support%2F CloudStack Bootcamp Training Courseshttp://secure-web.cisco.com/1x7d61M2SDzx2SvrIj9y8lD6Eepy3dddj EIFHasGDV_PPBn4EwtHVaqqdWSD1VShX_OR-DKgxqKGgB-dO7jrsSLYkWAw7UE1EeKQdH I4RW9BPnlYREiTeAcWT3YeOlfQh9EzHqk1uXnuftQxPCbewMDyEcqAzM6O-6r7R7sYuIx I6xPdCoei7JH2Bkpsljdp-/http%3A%2F%2Fshapeblue.com%2Fcloudstack-traini ng%2F This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any views or opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Shape Blue Ltd or related companies. If you are not the intended recipient of this email, you must
VPC Private gateway not being removed
Unfortunately, I fat fingered a VLAN in a VPC Private gateway I was
setting up. I removed it using the UI without any errors, but when I
go to create the new one, I get the following error: Private network
for the vlan: vlan://4000 and cidr 10.233.5.0/24 already exists for
Vpc 16 in zone AusZone1
I also tried removing it via cloudmonkey.
(local) mycloudmonkey delete privategateway
id=340b56bb-ee01-49be-84b4-9e54fd2af83d
.Error
Async job ed15f016-fd7e-48fb-b92c-0ea07302bffb failed
Error 530, Invalid private gateway id
accountid = a9d7423c-a02e-11e4-b7f0-00505695fae7
cmd = org.apache.cloudstack.api.command.admin.vpc.DeletePrivateGatewayCmd
created = 2015-04-21T06:38:36-0700
jobid = ed15f016-fd7e-48fb-b92c-0ea07302bffb
jobprocstatus = 0
jobresult:
errorcode = 530
errortext = Invalid private gateway id
jobresultcode = 530
jobresulttype = object
jobstatus = 2
userid = a9d755d8-a02e-11e4-b7f0-00505695fae7
Looking at the database, the problem becomes somewhat clear:
mysql select id,uuid,domain_id,state,removed,ip4_address from vpc_gateways;
++--+---+--+-+--+
| id | uuid | domain_id | state|
removed | ip4_address |
++--+---+--+-+--+
| 1 | 63a9f6f7-dbe2-4825-a3e2-17e3892c0ded | 1 | Ready|
NULL| 10.233.51.92 |
| 2 | 340b56bb-ee01-49be-84b4-9e54fd2af83d | 1 | Removing |
2015-04-20 21:28:53 | 10.233.5.11 |
++--+---+--+-+--+
2 rows in set (0.00 sec)
Unfortunately I don't have the logs from initially removing the VPC. I
can try and re-create this If needed, but I need to get this
environment fixed before I do anything else. Will setting the
state=Removed on the gateway entry in the database correct this?
Here are the logs from the management-server.log when trying to remove
the VPC via the UI:
2015-04-21 06:36:16,036 DEBUG [c.c.a.m.AgentManagerImpl]
(AgentManager-Handler-15:null) SeqA 9-315848: Processing Seq 9-315848:
{ Cmd , MgmtId: -1, via: 9, Ver: v1, Flags: 11,
[{com.cloud.agent.api.ConsoleProxyLoadReportCommand:{_proxyVmId:78,_loadInfo:{\n
\connections\: []\n},wait:0}}] }
2015-04-21 06:36:16,049 DEBUG [c.c.a.m.AgentManagerImpl]
(AgentManager-Handler-15:null) SeqA 9-315848: Sending Seq 9-315848: {
Ans: , MgmtId: 345050016868, via: 9, Ver: v1, Flags: 100010,
[{com.cloud.agent.api.AgentControlAnswer:{result:true,wait:0}}]
}
2015-04-21 06:36:16,853 DEBUG [c.c.a.m.AgentManagerImpl]
(AgentManager-Handler-2:null) Ping from 15
2015-04-21 06:36:16,877 DEBUG [c.c.a.m.AgentManagerImpl]
(AgentManager-Handler-4:null) Ping from 9
2015-04-21 06:36:20,715 DEBUG [c.c.a.ApiServlet]
(catalina-exec-6:ctx-62b2ea0a) ===START=== 10.233.51.176 -- GET
command=createPrivateGatewaysourcenatsupported=falseresponse=jsonsessionkey=sFXaEOKvIpqQArupbqZuPX6wYOo%3Dphysicalnetworkid=63a1c53c-b799-452a-ad15-3e0ef582c456vpcid=0fef5e73-b916-4505-8760-4321a3763bf6ipaddress=10.233.5.12gateway=10.233.5.1netmask=255.255.255.0vlan=4000aclid=9599b3fe-a02e-11e4-b7f0-00505695fae7_=1429623380716
2015-04-21 06:36:20,761 DEBUG [c.c.n.v.VpcManagerImpl]
(catalina-exec-6:ctx-62b2ea0a ctx-ebd9cd79) Creating Private gateway
for VPC [VPC [16-RSIDevNet]
2015-04-21 06:36:20,762 INFO [c.c.n.v.VpcManagerImpl]
(catalina-exec-6:ctx-62b2ea0a ctx-ebd9cd79) creating new network for
vpc [VPC [16-RSIDevNet] using broadcast uri: 4000
2015-04-21 06:36:20,774 DEBUG [c.c.n.NetworkServiceImpl]
(catalina-exec-6:ctx-62b2ea0a ctx-ebd9cd79) Private network already
exists: Ntwk[2a99ce65-36b0-432e-8fd8-f748a26aabdf|Guest|5]
2015-04-21 06:36:20,776 DEBUG [c.c.u.d.T.Transaction]
(catalina-exec-6:ctx-62b2ea0a ctx-ebd9cd79) Rolling back the
transaction: Time = 15 Name = catalina-exec-6; called by
-TransactionLegacy.rollback:900-TransactionLegacy.removeUpTo:843-TransactionLegacy.close:667-Transaction.execute:41-NetworkServiceImpl.createPrivateNetwork:3991-NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0:-2-NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke:57-DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke:43-Method.invoke:606-AopUtils.invokeJoinpointUsingReflection:317-ReflectiveMethodInvocation.invokeJoinpoint:183-ReflectiveMethodInvocation.proceed:150
2015-04-21 06:36:20,790 INFO [c.c.a.ApiServer]
(catalina-exec-6:ctx-62b2ea0a ctx-ebd9cd79) Private network for the
vlan: vlan://4000 and cidr 10.233.5.0/24 already exists for Vpc 16
in zone AusZone1
2015-04-21 06:36:20,790 DEBUG [c.c.a.ApiServlet]
(catalina-exec-6:ctx-62b2ea0a ctx-ebd9cd79) ===END=== 10.233.51.176
-- GET
Re: cpu overprovisioning
If I change the over-provisioning ratio in cluster-relative settings (infrastructure-cluser-cluster-name-settings) the dashboard show the sum of real GHz the overprovisioned amount of GHz (324GHz) as aspected, but after a while also the sum of Ghz is multiplied by the same factor making it unnecessary... Il 21/04/2015 15:26, Bharat Kumar ha scritto: In case of cloudstack, cpu capacity for host is total of cpus * no of Ghz * overporvisoning. total capacity = sum of capacities of individual hosts. Thanks, Bharat. On 21-Apr-2015, at 6:49 pm, Abhinandan Prateek abhinandan.prat...@shapeblue.com wrote: Available CPU will be 3 times the actual CPU when over provisioned by 3. The UI not showing the over provisioned value seems like a bug. -abhi On 21-Apr-2015, at 6:34 pm, Ugo Vasi ugo.v...@procne.it wrote: Hi all, we have a cluster of three machines with 16 CPU at 2.2GHz each and we have set a cpu-overprovizioning to 3. I would expect that the CPU system capacity of the dashboard appear with the sum of megahertz CPUs multiplied by three instead I get the real sum (108MHz). I do not understand if this overprovisioning allows me to allocate more MHz of real ones asthe documentation say since in reality the virtual machines occupy on average only 20% of the computing power. thanks in advance -- U g o V a s iugo.v...@procne.it P r o c n e s.r.l) via Cotonificio 45 33010 Tavagnacco IT phone: +390432486523 fax: +390432486523 Le informazioni contenute in questo messaggio sono riservate e confidenziali ed è vietata la diffusione in qualunque modo eseguita. Qualora Lei non fosse la persona a cui il presente messaggio è destinato, La invitiamo ad eliminarlo e a non leggerlo, dandocene gentilmente comunicazione. Per qualsiasi informazione si prega di contattare supp...@procne.it . Rif. D.L. 196/2003 Find out more about ShapeBlue and our range of CloudStack related services IaaS Cloud Design Buildhttp://secure-web.cisco.com/1Yol7cn0c4CnDObcpSirV3DCPZ0WVdvOa3LhGNjqR1LC8fdUx8eCLTnMMSoshd9HpKAnV6UPQ_yMd3M-1eZw2Ta-m7j5KgANh1cCgIkUg7gUvZUUMIkYZDZDpYP9IDOTuw6o3kuFAtJGiF0j7g8WWr6r9HIr7CqwJi047V_38MGrrr_r5JkLvVUoDdjYuhuBW/http%3A%2F%2Fshapeblue.com%2Fiaas-cloud-design-and-build%2F%2F CSForge – rapid IaaS deployment frameworkhttp://secure-web.cisco.com/1QG_8HfqAJxyrN85oTEHIYNcbRgpmjrAkp0COA-UIvjKFK3VDTqCkj9wp1e8W2JML6G56lRvuJpQMr5faxHOlQGVsy3eWivku7VXSTR7Z_reGWbZS3mVJGbFxehTWTUAsA_HOfZ_i-dHdhIuYwCSXyx0PRQcIdyEE51ZlHghIwpl_CcVK4rj2EVlq5FWSNjbo/http%3A%2F%2Fshapeblue.com%2Fcsforge%2F CloudStack Consultinghttp://secure-web.cisco.com/1Jd9xC30lbTOK4Yz24hsK-SYyFxcaJ15JHz5Aat3Lyd0qe4l_RGA3YuQAxdRlfgsKaT6hI61qwykCBNqiJRWwlaPIeK_FNJxaJtTYZ9o6c9gUZUI1GDDw2fGIesLOAjS5FnkfMjK4oqpmjkwKOCLxeXnBDDSoZhjQjyBB65K27drcx_ll0lovUbqvBoz1HRfM/http%3A%2F%2Fshapeblue.com%2Fcloudstack-consultancy%2F CloudStack Software Engineeringhttp://secure-web.cisco.com/10UUubQoT9nA8gFa_q8Qn0och7aMNdFTHV-Yar0Ga9h9N4I3YNAockHpCCMMiqhnaECX7ZcolpDZ0IWds3ca9SDAQ_9hoGadj_YhjpPvW95NwJlv15UDNFNs8r99wke8pQl6BKjgzv94SQuWHueziP1J7X8G7uzAbyj7qqQIjwV8qqxyV81xYENQyXC13qHt9/http%3A%2F%2Fshapeblue.com%2Fcloudstack-software-engineering%2F CloudStack Infrastructure Supporthttp://secure-web.cisco.com/1tHfpu6yxqCTFv4ED5hd1IzUqlDUAasw9gn30YT3ucOvb0PNffUKzHjrKXCpTie0_dZ2a1Veui99C8Qp-p9CiKkobjVQ7pQow2X2A6AYXKH5HwcPQ4zvZuLr30h5QBdE3MjtkFm_PM2JKk7WRAhtnukS0nvUJnIY1CzNyvezE5YVmd8PpcV-eZRBptj4Mv_5i/http%3A%2F%2Fshapeblue.com%2Fcloudstack-infrastructure-support%2F CloudStack Bootcamp Training Courseshttp://secure-web.cisco.com/1x7d61M2SDzx2SvrIj9y8lD6Eepy3dddjEIFHasGDV_PPBn4EwtHVaqqdWSD1VShX_OR-DKgxqKGgB-dO7jrsSLYkWAw7UE1EeKQdHI4RW9BPnlYREiTeAcWT3YeOlfQh9EzHqk1uXnuftQxPCbewMDyEcqAzM6O-6r7R7sYuIxI6xPdCoei7JH2Bkpsljdp-/http%3A%2F%2Fshapeblue.com%2Fcloudstack-training%2F This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any views or opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Shape Blue Ltd or related companies. If you are not the intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any action based upon its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please contact the sender if you believe you have received this email in error. Shape Blue Ltd is a company incorporated in England Wales. ShapeBlue Services India LLP is a company incorporated in India and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. Shape Blue Brasil Consultoria Ltda is a company incorporated in Brasil and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue SA Pty Ltd is a company registered by The Republic of South Africa and is traded under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue is a registered trademark. -- U g o V a s iugo.v...@procne.it P r o c n e s.r.l) via Cotonificio 45 33010 Tavagnacco IT phone: +390432486523 fax: +390432486523 Le informazioni contenute in questo messaggio sono riservate e
RE: Netwok offerings
I have figured out how to partition network properly, but the only problem I got after guest VM got public IP from the shared pool - malfunctioninig console. Since there is only one IP on guest VM - public there is no need for Console proxy VM I suppose. So I am getting timeout while trying to open console using UI. Will look how to fix it. Vadim. -Original Message- From: Vadim Kimlaychuk [mailto:vadim.kimlayc...@elion.ee] Sent: Tuesday, April 21, 2015 10:20 AM To: users@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: RE: Netwok offerings Geoff, I am using one NIC (bond) for public and guest traffic. Public is tagged as 500, guest VLANs 600-632. But I am still a bit lost in details. Assume I have B-class public network: 192.2.1.0/24 with GW at my router - 192.2.1.1. I would like to have 32 IP dedicated to VPC and 128 dedicated to shared public IP pool. VPC IP-s are taken from admin public network defined during set-up. So I have. 1. VPC net -- tag:500, 192.2.1.0/27, gw 192.2.1.1, range 2-31 usable IPs 2. Shared public IP range -- tag:500, 192.2.1.32/25, gw 192.2.1.33, range 34-126 usable But this will not work, because IP ranges overlap. How do I partition? The other question -- what device will play gw - 192.2.1.33 role ? Will it be cloudstack with VR or should I register it manually on external router ? Thank you in advance, Vadim. -Original Message- From: Geoff Higginbottom [mailto:geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com] Sent: Tuesday, April 21, 2015 9:13 AM To: users@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: RE: Netwok offerings Hi Vadim, You can use the 'Shared Network' offering for this, and assign a Public IP range. Just be aware that if you are using different NICs on your Hypervisors for Public and Guest traffic, the Shared Network is still treated as Guest traffic so you need to ensure the VLAN you assign to the Shared Network is mapped to the Guest NIC etc Regards Geoff Higginbottom D: +44 20 3603 0542 | S: +44 20 3603 0540 | M: +447968161581 geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com -Original Message- From: Vadim Kimlaychuk [mailto:vadim.kimlayc...@elion.ee] Sent: 21 April 2015 07:07 To: users@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Netwok offerings Hi all, Need you advice regarding network offers. I have ACS with advanced networking implemented. VPC works fine. But probably not all clients need to have VPC. How can I offer public IP address from IP pool (shared?) without creating VPC ?? For example client just need 1 VM with public IP address and that’s it. Vadim Kimlaychuk P.S. I use VLAN isolation method for all the networks. Find out more about ShapeBlue and our range of CloudStack related services IaaS Cloud Design Buildhttp://shapeblue.com/iaas-cloud-design-and-build// CSForge – rapid IaaS deployment frameworkhttp://shapeblue.com/csforge/ CloudStack Consultinghttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-consultancy/ CloudStack Software Engineeringhttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-software-engineering/ CloudStack Infrastructure Supporthttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-infrastructure-support/ CloudStack Bootcamp Training Courseshttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/ This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any views or opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Shape Blue Ltd or related companies. If you are not the intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any action based upon its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please contact the sender if you believe you have received this email in error. Shape Blue Ltd is a company incorporated in England Wales. ShapeBlue Services India LLP is a company incorporated in India and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. Shape Blue Brasil Consultoria Ltda is a company incorporated in Brasil and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue SA Pty Ltd is a company registered by The Republic of South Africa and is traded under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue is a registered trademark.
AW: AW: cpu overprovisioning
Please try to stop and start the vm. Maybe reboot is not working here. You should start to see more free CPU after the first vm. Mit freundlichen Grüßen / With kind regards, Swen Brüseke -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: Ugo Vasi [mailto:ugo.v...@procne.it] Gesendet: Dienstag, 21. April 2015 16:40 An: users@cloudstack.apache.org Betreff: Re: AW: cpu overprovisioning Hi Swen, I try rebboting 2 vm but the amount of cpu MHz is not changed. Do I have to restart all vm before you see a change? Il 21/04/2015 16:16, S. Brüseke - proIO GmbH ha scritto: This is because the factor of overprovisioning is attached to the instance too! And this factor is only changing after rebooting the instance. So after a change of cpu.overprovisioning.factor you need to reboot all instances on this cluster which were running before this change was made. Mit freundlichen Grüßen / With kind regards, Swen Brüseke -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: Ugo Vasi [mailto:ugo.v...@procne.it] Gesendet: Dienstag, 21. April 2015 16:06 An: users@cloudstack.apache.org Betreff: Re: cpu overprovisioning If I change the over-provisioning ratio in cluster-relative settings (infrastructure-cluser-cluster-name-settings) the dashboard show the sum of real GHz the overprovisioned amount of GHz (324GHz) as aspected, but after a while also the sum of Ghz is multiplied by the same factor making it unnecessary... Il 21/04/2015 15:26, Bharat Kumar ha scritto: In case of cloudstack, cpu capacity for host is total of cpus * no of Ghz * overporvisoning. total capacity = sum of capacities of individual hosts. Thanks, Bharat. On 21-Apr-2015, at 6:49 pm, Abhinandan Prateek abhinandan.prat...@shapeblue.com wrote: Available CPU will be 3 times the actual CPU when over provisioned by 3. The UI not showing the over provisioned value seems like a bug. -abhi On 21-Apr-2015, at 6:34 pm, Ugo Vasi ugo.v...@procne.it wrote: Hi all, we have a cluster of three machines with 16 CPU at 2.2GHz each and we have set a cpu-overprovizioning to 3. I would expect that the CPU system capacity of the dashboard appear with the sum of megahertz CPUs multiplied by three instead I get the real sum (108MHz). I do not understand if this overprovisioning allows me to allocate more MHz of real ones asthe documentation say since in reality the virtual machines occupy on average only 20% of the computing power. thanks in advance -- U g o V a s iugo.v...@procne.it P r o c n e s.r.l) via Cotonificio 45 33010 Tavagnacco IT phone: +390432486523 fax: +390432486523 Le informazioni contenute in questo messaggio sono riservate e confidenziali ed è vietata la diffusione in qualunque modo eseguita. Qualora Lei non fosse la persona a cui il presente messaggio è destinato, La invitiamo ad eliminarlo e a non leggerlo, dandocene gentilmente comunicazione. Per qualsiasi informazione si prega di contattare supp...@procne.it . Rif. D.L. 196/2003 Find out more about ShapeBlue and our range of CloudStack related services IaaS Cloud Design Buildhttp://secure-web.cisco.com/1Yol7cn0c4CnDObcpSirV3DCPZ0WVdvOa3L hGNjqR1LC8fdUx8eCLTnMMSoshd9HpKAnV6UPQ_yMd3M-1eZw2Ta-m7j5KgANh1cCgIkU g7gUvZUUMIkYZDZDpYP9IDOTuw6o3kuFAtJGiF0j7g8WWr6r9HIr7CqwJi047V_38MGrr r_r5JkLvVUoDdjYuhuBW/http%3A%2F%2Fshapeblue.com%2Fiaas-cloud-design-a nd-build%2F%2F CSForge - rapid IaaS deployment frameworkhttp://secure-web.cisco.com/1QG_8HfqAJxyrN85oTEHIYNcbRgpmjr Akp0COA-UIvjKFK3VDTqCkj9wp1e8W2JML6G56lRvuJpQMr5faxHOlQGVsy3eWivku7VX STR7Z_reGWbZS3mVJGbFxehTWTUAsA_HOfZ_i-dHdhIuYwCSXyx0PRQcIdyEE51ZlHghI wpl_CcVK4rj2EVlq5FWSNjbo/http%3A%2F%2Fshapeblue.com%2Fcsforge%2F CloudStack Consultinghttp://secure-web.cisco.com/1Jd9xC30lbTOK4Yz24hsK-SYyFxcaJ 15JHz5Aat3Lyd0qe4l_RGA3YuQAxdRlfgsKaT6hI61qwykCBNqiJRWwlaPIeK_FNJxaJt TYZ9o6c9gUZUI1GDDw2fGIesLOAjS5FnkfMjK4oqpmjkwKOCLxeXnBDDSoZhjQjyBB65K 27drcx_ll0lovUbqvBoz1HRfM/http%3A%2F%2Fshapeblue.com%2Fcloudstack-con sultancy%2F CloudStack Software Engineeringhttp://secure-web.cisco.com/10UUubQoT9nA8gFa_q8Qn0och7aMN dFTHV-Yar0Ga9h9N4I3YNAockHpCCMMiqhnaECX7ZcolpDZ0IWds3ca9SDAQ_9hoGadj_ YhjpPvW95NwJlv15UDNFNs8r99wke8pQl6BKjgzv94SQuWHueziP1J7X8G7uzAbyj7qqQ IjwV8qqxyV81xYENQyXC13qHt9/http%3A%2F%2Fshapeblue.com%2Fcloudstack-so ftware-engineering%2F CloudStack Infrastructure Supporthttp://secure-web.cisco.com/1tHfpu6yxqCTFv4ED5hd1IzUqlDUAasw9 gn30YT3ucOvb0PNffUKzHjrKXCpTie0_dZ2a1Veui99C8Qp-p9CiKkobjVQ7pQow2X2A6 AYXKH5HwcPQ4zvZuLr30h5QBdE3MjtkFm_PM2JKk7WRAhtnukS0nvUJnIY1CzNyvezE5Y Vmd8PpcV-eZRBptj4Mv_5i/http%3A%2F%2Fshapeblue.com%2Fcloudstack-infras tructure-support%2F CloudStack Bootcamp Training Courseshttp://secure-web.cisco.com/1x7d61M2SDzx2SvrIj9y8lD6Eepy3dddj EIFHasGDV_PPBn4EwtHVaqqdWSD1VShX_OR-DKgxqKGgB-dO7jrsSLYkWAw7UE1EeKQdH I4RW9BPnlYREiTeAcWT3YeOlfQh9EzHqk1uXnuftQxPCbewMDyEcqAzM6O-6r7R7sYuIx I6xPdCoei7JH2Bkpsljdp-/http%3A%2F%2Fshapeblue.com%2Fcloudstack-traini ng%2F
AW: cpu overprovisioning
By instance I mean VM. Mit freundlichen Grüßen / With kind regards, Swen Brüseke -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: Rafael Weingartner [mailto:rafaelweingart...@gmail.com] Gesendet: Dienstag, 21. April 2015 16:28 An: users@cloudstack.apache.org Betreff: Re: cpu overprovisioning When you say instance, did you mean CS web application instance? On Tue, Apr 21, 2015 at 11:16 AM, S. Brüseke - proIO GmbH s.brues...@proio.com wrote: This is because the factor of overprovisioning is attached to the instance too! And this factor is only changing after rebooting the instance. So after a change of cpu.overprovisioning.factor you need to reboot all instances on this cluster which were running before this change was made. Mit freundlichen Grüßen / With kind regards, Swen Brüseke -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: Ugo Vasi [mailto:ugo.v...@procne.it] Gesendet: Dienstag, 21. April 2015 16:06 An: users@cloudstack.apache.org Betreff: Re: cpu overprovisioning If I change the over-provisioning ratio in cluster-relative settings (infrastructure-cluser-cluster-name-settings) the dashboard show the sum of real GHz the overprovisioned amount of GHz (324GHz) as aspected, but after a while also the sum of Ghz is multiplied by the same factor making it unnecessary... Il 21/04/2015 15:26, Bharat Kumar ha scritto: In case of cloudstack, cpu capacity for host is total of cpus * no of Ghz * overporvisoning. total capacity = sum of capacities of individual hosts. Thanks, Bharat. On 21-Apr-2015, at 6:49 pm, Abhinandan Prateek abhinandan.prat...@shapeblue.com wrote: Available CPU will be 3 times the actual CPU when over provisioned by 3. The UI not showing the over provisioned value seems like a bug. -abhi On 21-Apr-2015, at 6:34 pm, Ugo Vasi ugo.v...@procne.it wrote: Hi all, we have a cluster of three machines with 16 CPU at 2.2GHz each and we have set a cpu-overprovizioning to 3. I would expect that the CPU system capacity of the dashboard appear with the sum of megahertz CPUs multiplied by three instead I get the real sum (108MHz). I do not understand if this overprovisioning allows me to allocate more MHz of real ones asthe documentation say since in reality the virtual machines occupy on average only 20% of the computing power. thanks in advance -- U g o V a s iugo.v...@procne.it P r o c n e s.r.l) via Cotonificio 45 33010 Tavagnacco IT phone: +390432486523 fax: +390432486523 Le informazioni contenute in questo messaggio sono riservate e confidenziali ed è vietata la diffusione in qualunque modo eseguita. Qualora Lei non fosse la persona a cui il presente messaggio è destinato, La invitiamo ad eliminarlo e a non leggerlo, dandocene gentilmente comunicazione. Per qualsiasi informazione si prega di contattare supp...@procne.it . Rif. D.L. 196/2003 Find out more about ShapeBlue and our range of CloudStack related services IaaS Cloud Design Buildhttp://secure-web.cisco.com/1Yol7cn0c4CnDObcpSirV3DCPZ0WVdvOa 3L hGNjqR1LC8fdUx8eCLTnMMSoshd9HpKAnV6UPQ_yMd3M-1eZw2Ta-m7j5KgANh1cCgI kU g7gUvZUUMIkYZDZDpYP9IDOTuw6o3kuFAtJGiF0j7g8WWr6r9HIr7CqwJi047V_38MG rr r_r5JkLvVUoDdjYuhuBW/http%3A%2F%2Fshapeblue.com%2Fiaas-cloud-design -a nd-build%2F%2F CSForge - rapid IaaS deployment frameworkhttp://secure-web.cisco.com/1QG_8HfqAJxyrN85oTEHIYNcbRgpm jr Akp0COA-UIvjKFK3VDTqCkj9wp1e8W2JML6G56lRvuJpQMr5faxHOlQGVsy3eWivku7 VX STR7Z_reGWbZS3mVJGbFxehTWTUAsA_HOfZ_i-dHdhIuYwCSXyx0PRQcIdyEE51ZlHg hI wpl_CcVK4rj2EVlq5FWSNjbo/http%3A%2F%2Fshapeblue.com%2Fcsforge%2F CloudStack Consultinghttp://secure-web.cisco.com/1Jd9xC30lbTOK4Yz24hsK-SYyFxc aJ 15JHz5Aat3Lyd0qe4l_RGA3YuQAxdRlfgsKaT6hI61qwykCBNqiJRWwlaPIeK_FNJxa Jt TYZ9o6c9gUZUI1GDDw2fGIesLOAjS5FnkfMjK4oqpmjkwKOCLxeXnBDDSoZhjQjyBB6 5K 27drcx_ll0lovUbqvBoz1HRfM/http%3A%2F%2Fshapeblue.com%2Fcloudstack-c on sultancy%2F CloudStack Software Engineeringhttp://secure-web.cisco.com/10UUubQoT9nA8gFa_q8Qn0och7a MN dFTHV-Yar0Ga9h9N4I3YNAockHpCCMMiqhnaECX7ZcolpDZ0IWds3ca9SDAQ_9hoGad j_ YhjpPvW95NwJlv15UDNFNs8r99wke8pQl6BKjgzv94SQuWHueziP1J7X8G7uzAbyj7q qQ IjwV8qqxyV81xYENQyXC13qHt9/http%3A%2F%2Fshapeblue.com%2Fcloudstack- so ftware-engineering%2F CloudStack Infrastructure Supporthttp://secure-web.cisco.com/1tHfpu6yxqCTFv4ED5hd1IzUqlDUAas w9 gn30YT3ucOvb0PNffUKzHjrKXCpTie0_dZ2a1Veui99C8Qp-p9CiKkobjVQ7pQow2X2 A6 AYXKH5HwcPQ4zvZuLr30h5QBdE3MjtkFm_PM2JKk7WRAhtnukS0nvUJnIY1CzNyvezE 5Y Vmd8PpcV-eZRBptj4Mv_5i/http%3A%2F%2Fshapeblue.com%2Fcloudstack-infr as tructure-support%2F CloudStack Bootcamp Training Courseshttp://secure-web.cisco.com/1x7d61M2SDzx2SvrIj9y8lD6Eepy3dd dj EIFHasGDV_PPBn4EwtHVaqqdWSD1VShX_OR-DKgxqKGgB-dO7jrsSLYkWAw7UE1EeKQ dH I4RW9BPnlYREiTeAcWT3YeOlfQh9EzHqk1uXnuftQxPCbewMDyEcqAzM6O-6r7R7sYu Ix
Announcing Apache™ CloudStack™ v4.4.3
Mature, easy-to-deploy Open Source Cloud computing software platform boasts improved efficiency and performance. The Apache CloudStack project announced the immediate availability of Apache CloudStack v4.4.3, the latest version of the turnkey Open Source cloud computing software platform used for creating private-, public-, and hybrid cloud environments. Apache CloudStack clouds enable billions of dollars' worth of business transactions annually across their clouds, and its maturity and stability has led it to has become the Open Source platform for many service providers to set up on-demand, elastic public cloud computing services, as well as enterprises and others to set up a private or hybrid cloud for use by their own employees. While working hard on a new release we managed to backport many stabilizing fixes to this maintenance release. Both for 4.5 and the next version work is going hard and I am happy that we managed to bring out this fix release for users of prior versions. Daan Hoogland, member of the Apache CloudStack Project Management Committee and release manager for version 4.4. Lauded by Gartner Group, CloudStack includes an intuitive user interface and rich APIs for managing the compute, networking, software, and storage infrastructure resources. CloudStack v4.4.3 reflects dozens of fixes A complete overview of all new enhancements can be found in the project release notes at http://docs.cloudstack.apache.org/projects/cloudstack-release-notes/en/4.4.3/ CloudStack has been used by thousands of organizations worldwide and is in use/production at Alcatel-Lucent, Autodesk, BT Cloud, China Telecom, DATACAENTER Services, DataPipe, Edmunds.com, Exoscale, GreenQloud, Hokkaido University, IDC Frontier, Ikoula, KDDI, KT/Korea Telecom, LeaseWeb, NTT, Orange, PCextreme, Schuberg Philis, Shopzilla, Slovak Telekom, SunGard AS, Taiwan Mobile, Tata, Trader Media Group, TomTom, University of Melbourne, University of Sao Paolo, Verizon, WebMD and Zynga, among others. CloudStack originated at Cloud.com, which was acquired by Citrix in 2011. CloudStack was submitted to the Apache Incubator in April 2012 and graduated as an Apache Software Foundation Top-level Project in March 2013. Availability CloudStack v4.4.3 is available immediately as a free download from http://cloudstack.apache.org/downloads.html. Apache CloudStack software is released under the Apache License v2.0. Governance and Oversight Apache CloudStack is overseen by a self-selected team of active contributors to the project. A Project Management Committee (PMC) guides the Project's day-to-day operations, including community development and product releases. Get Involved! Apache CloudStack welcomes contribution and community participation through mailing lists as well as attending face-to-face MeetUps, developer trainings, and user events. Catch CloudStack in action at the CloudStack Days CloudStack Days Tokyo 2015, 2nd June 2015, http://events.linuxfoundation.org/events/cloudstack-tokyo CloudStack Days Seattle 2015 , 20th August 2015, http://events.linuxfoundation.org/events/cloudstack-seattle and CloudStack Collaboration Conference 2015 in Dublin, 8th and 9th of October 2015, http://cloudstackcollab.org -- Daan
Re: 4.3 - 4.4.2 upgrade All hosts in 'alert' or disconnected state
Did you change the network backend mode from bridge to openvswitch on the xen servers ? If yes please change it back to bridge mode. On Sat, Apr 18, 2015 at 8:23 PM, STEENBLIK Jason jason.steenb...@leonteq.com wrote: I just did an upgrade to 4.4.2 from 4.3. After the upgrade all of the hosts (all xenserver 6.2) are in alert or disconnected state. I'm not able to stop/start/restart any VMs currently. The errors are below. I only have basic zones. Anybody seen this before? 2015-04-18 16:49:03,378 WARN [c.c.h.x.r.CitrixResourceBase] (DirectAgent-112:ctx-fb8d492c) Failed to configure brige firewall 2015-04-18 16:49:03,379 WARN [c.c.h.x.r.CitrixResourceBase] (DirectAgent-112:ctx-fb8d492c) Check host 10.30.22.152 for CSP is installed or not and check network mode for bridge 2015-04-18 16:49:03,379 WARN [c.c.h.x.d.XcpServerDiscoverer] (AgentTaskPool-7:ctx-4ed84f13) Unable to setup agent 76 due to Failed to configure brige firewall 2015-04-18 16:49:03,379 INFO [c.c.u.e.CSExceptionErrorCode] (AgentTaskPool-7:ctx-4ed84f13) Could not find exception: com.cloud.exception.ConnectionException in error code list for exceptions 2015-04-18 16:49:03,379 WARN [c.c.a.m.AgentManagerImpl] (AgentTaskPool-7:ctx-4ed84f13) Monitor XcpServerDiscoverer says there is an error in the connect process for 76 due to Reinitialize agent after setup. 2015-04-18 16:49:03,379 INFO [c.c.a.m.AgentManagerImpl] (AgentTaskPool-7:ctx-4ed84f13) Host 76 is disconnecting with event AgentDisconnected 2015-04-18 16:49:03,395 WARN [c.c.r.ResourceManagerImpl] (AgentTaskPool-7:ctx-4ed84f13) Unable to connect due to com.cloud.exception.ConnectionException: Reinitialize agent after setup. at com.cloud.hypervisor.xen.discoverer.XcpServerDiscoverer.processConnect(XcpServerDiscoverer.java:657) at com.cloud.agent.manager.AgentManagerImpl.notifyMonitorsOfConnection(AgentManagerImpl.java:518) at com.cloud.agent.manager.AgentManagerImpl.handleDirectConnectAgent(AgentManagerImpl.java:1431) at com.cloud.resource.ResourceManagerImpl.createHostAndAgent(ResourceManagerImpl.java:1765) at com.cloud.resource.ResourceManagerImpl.createHostAndAgent(ResourceManagerImpl.java:1891) at sun.reflect.GeneratedMethodAccessor102.invoke(Unknown Source) at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43) at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:606) at org.springframework.aop.support.AopUtils.invokeJoinpointUsingReflection(AopUtils.java:317) at org.springframework.aop.framework.ReflectiveMethodInvocation.invokeJoinpoint(ReflectiveMethodInvocation.java:183) at org.springframework.aop.framework.ReflectiveMethodInvocation.proceed(ReflectiveMethodInvocation.java:150) at org.springframework.aop.interceptor.ExposeInvocationInterceptor.invoke(ExposeInvocationInterceptor.java:91) at org.springframework.aop.framework.ReflectiveMethodInvocation.proceed(ReflectiveMethodInvocation.java:172) at org.springframework.aop.framework.JdkDynamicAopProxy.invoke(JdkDynamicAopProxy.java:204) at com.sun.proxy.$Proxy148.createHostAndAgent(Unknown Source) at com.cloud.agent.manager.AgentManagerImpl$SimulateStartTask.runInContext(AgentManagerImpl.java:1073) at org.apache.cloudstack.managed.context.ManagedContextRunnable$1.run(ManagedContextRunnable.java:49) at org.apache.cloudstack.managed.context.impl.DefaultManagedContext$1.call(DefaultManagedContext.java:56) at org.apache.cloudstack.managed.context.impl.DefaultManagedContext.callWithContext(DefaultManagedContext.java:103) at org.apache.cloudstack.managed.context.impl.DefaultManagedContext.runWithContext(DefaultManagedContext.java:53) at org.apache.cloudstack.managed.context.ManagedContextRunnable.run(ManagedContextRunnable.java:46) at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1145) at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:615) at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:745) Jason Steenblik LEONTEQ SECURITIES AG IT INFRASTRUCTURE Direct: +41 58 800 12 56 | Mobile: +41 79 299 20 96 | Fax +41 58 800 1010 | jason.steenb...@leonteq.commailto:jason.steenb...@leonteq.com Brandschenkestrasse 90 | P.O. Box 1686 | CH - 8002 Zurich | i...@leonteq.commailto:i...@leonteq.com | www.leonteq.com http://www.leonteq.com/ === The Leonteq Mail Gateway made the following annotation === This e-mail is confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, you should not copy it, re-transmit it, use it or disclose its contents, but should return it to the sender immediately and delete the copy from your system. Leonteq Securities is not responsible for, nor endorses, any opinion, recommendation, conclusion, solicitation, offer or agreement or any information contained in
Re: Problem with SMB/CIFS primary storage version 4.5 hyperv Host
Hi Thomas,
Is your SMB storage server and Hyper-v host are part of AD ? I don't see
any AD account details in the logs provided.
Did you give full control on the SMB share to both the Hyper-v host and AD
user?
Thanks,
Sanjeev
On Mon, Apr 20, 2015 at 3:50 PM, Tischner, Thomas thomas.tisch...@qsc.de
wrote:
Hi,
i try to add a cifs primary storage via the web wizard and get the
following errors:
management-sever logs:
--
2015-04-20 09:43:17,041 DEBUG [c.c.h.h.r.HypervDirectConnectResource]
(DirectAgent-460:ctx-e813c1b2) (logid:e1495dea) POST response is
[{com.cloud.agent.api.ModifyStoragePoolAnswer:{result:false,details:Failed
to add storage pool 747b562d-1f88-39fe-b1d2-784be7d4a7ef, please verify
your pool
details,localPath:\\172.16.19.1\SMB3_PRI,templateInfo:{},poolInfo:{uuid:null,host:172.16.19.1,hostPath:/SMB3_PRI,localPath:\\172.16.19.1\SMB3_PRI,poolType:SMB,capacityBytes:0,availableBytes:0},contextMap:{}}}]
2015-04-20 09:43:17,042 DEBUG [c.c.h.h.r.HypervDirectConnectResource]
(DirectAgent-460:ctx-e813c1b2) (logid:e1495dea) executeRequest received
response
[{com.cloud.agent.api.ModifyStoragePoolAnswer:{poolInfo:{host:172.16.19.1,localPath:172.16.19.1\\SMB3_PRI,hostPath:/SMB3_PRI,poolType:SMB,capacityBytes:0,availableBytes:0},templateInfo:{},result:false,details:Failed
to add storage pool 747b562d-1f88-39fe-b1d2-784be7d4a7ef, please verify
your pool details,contextMap:{},wait:0}}]
2015-04-20 09:43:17,046 DEBUG [c.c.a.t.Request]
(DirectAgent-460:ctx-e813c1b2) (logid:e1495dea) Seq 4-114841790497947749:
Processing: { Ans: , MgmtId: 146454695956, via: 4, Ver: v1, Flags: 10,
[{com.cloud.agent.api.ModifyStoragePoolAnswer:{poolInfo:{host:172.16.19.1,localPath:172.16.19.1\\SMB3_PRI,hostPath:/SMB3_PRI,poolType:SMB,capacityBytes:0,availableBytes:0},templateInfo:{},result:false,details:Failed
to add storage pool 747b562d-1f88-39fe-b1d2-784be7d4a7ef, please verify
your pool details,wait:0}}] }
2015-04-20 09:43:17,047 DEBUG [c.c.a.m.AgentManagerImpl]
(catalina-exec-22:ctx-21cdb536 ctx-a8ee493e) (logid:e1495dea) Details from
executing class com.cloud.agent.api.ModifyStoragePoolCommand: Failed to add
storage pool 747b562d-1f88-39fe-b1d2-784be7d4a7ef, please verify your pool
details
2015-04-20 09:43:17,047 WARN [o.a.c.alerts]
(catalina-exec-22:ctx-21cdb536 ctx-a8ee493e) (logid:e1495dea) alertType::
7 // dataCenterId:: 1 // podId:: 1 // clusterId:: null // message:: Unable
to attach storage pool18 to the host4
2015-04-20 09:43:17,050 WARN
[o.a.c.s.d.l.CloudStackPrimaryDataStoreLifeCycleImpl]
(catalina-exec-22:ctx-21cdb536 ctx-a8ee493e) (logid:e1495dea) Unable to
establish a connection between Host[-4-Routing] and
org.apache.cloudstack.storage.datastore.PrimaryDataStoreImpl@70a08dbf
com.cloud.utils.exception.CloudRuntimeException: Unable establish
connection from storage head to storage pool 18 due to Failed to add
storage pool 747b562d-1f88-39fe-b1d2-784be7d4a7ef, please verify your pool
details18
at
org.apache.catalina.valves.ErrorReportValve.invoke(ErrorReportValve.java:102)
2015-04-20 09:43:17,051 WARN
[o.a.c.s.d.l.CloudStackPrimaryDataStoreLifeCycleImpl]
(catalina-exec-22:ctx-21cdb536 ctx-a8ee493e) (logid:e1495dea) No host can
access storage pool
org.apache.cloudstack.storage.datastore.PrimaryDataStoreImpl@70a08dbf on
cluster 1
2015-04-20 09:43:17,052 DEBUG [c.c.s.StorageManagerImpl]
(catalina-exec-22:ctx-21cdb536 ctx-a8ee493e) (logid:e1495dea) Failed to add
data store: Failed to access storage pool
com.cloud.utils.exception.CloudRuntimeException: Failed to access storage
pool
at
org.apache.catalina.valves.ErrorReportValve.invoke(ErrorReportValve.java:102)
2015-04-20 09:43:17,054 DEBUG [c.c.s.StorageManagerImpl]
(catalina-exec-22:ctx-21cdb536 ctx-a8ee493e) (logid:e1495dea) Failed to
clean up storage pool: null
2015-04-20 09:43:17,054 INFO [c.c.a.ApiServer]
(catalina-exec-22:ctx-21cdb536 ctx-a8ee493e) (logid:e1495dea) Failed to add
data store: Failed to access storage pool
--
Hyperv-host logs:
2015-04-20 11:44:16,810 [5] ERROR HypervResource.HypervResourceController
[7cfd733e-b230-4d4b-9923-d9df6a45647c] - Failed to add storage pool
747b562d-1f88-39fe-b1d2-784be7d4a7ef, please verify your pool details
2015-04-20 11:44:16,810 [5] INFO HypervResource.HypervResourceController
[7cfd733e-b230-4d4b-9923-d9df6a45647c] -
com.cloud.agent.api.ModifyStoragePoolCommand{
add: true,
pool: {
id: 18,
uuid: 747b562d-1f88-39fe-b1d2-784be7d4a7ef,
host: 172.16.19.1,
path: /SMB3_PRI,
port: 445,
type: SMB
},
localPath: /mnt//747b562d-1f88-39fe-b1d2-784be7d4a7ef,
contextMap: {
logid: e1495dea
},
wait: 0
}
2015-04-20 11:44:16,810 [5] INFO HypervResource.HypervResourceController
[7cfd733e-b230-4d4b-9923-d9df6a45647c] - {
com.cloud.agent.api.ModifyStoragePoolAnswer: {
result: false,
details: Failed to add storage pool
747b562d-1f88-39fe-b1d2-784be7d4a7ef, please
Re: cpu overprovisioning
Hi, The change in cpu overcommit factor will not change the amount of resource that are available to you. It will change the way you want to use the free resource available at that time. It won’t change what was already allocated. for example if you have deployed the VMs with overcommit say 2 and after a while you change the overcommit to 3, the used resource will be scaled based on the change. changing the overcommit cannot create resource. It can only change the way you want to use the free resource. So now after the change in overcommit you can deploy 3 times more VMs (of a given service offering) than usual using the the resource that is free at the time of changing the overcommit value. The perviously allocated resource cannot be freed until you restart the VMs. This link will tell you how resource allocation calculations are made. https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/CPU+and+RAM+Overcommit Thanks, Bharat. On 21-Apr-2015, at 11:20 pm, Rafael Weingärtner rafaelweingart...@gmail.commailto:rafaelweingart...@gmail.com wrote: I have not looked at the code, but that seems odd. Restarting VMs instances to update the resource usage/resource availability when changing the overprovisioning factor. On Tue, Apr 21, 2015 at 12:51 PM, S. Brüseke - proIO GmbH s.brues...@proio.commailto:s.brues...@proio.com wrote: Please try to stop and start the vm. Maybe reboot is not working here. You should start to see more free CPU after the first vm. Mit freundlichen Grüßen / With kind regards, Swen Brüseke -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: Ugo Vasi [mailto:ugo.v...@procne.it] Gesendet: Dienstag, 21. April 2015 16:40 An: users@cloudstack.apache.orgmailto:users@cloudstack.apache.org Betreff: Re: AW: cpu overprovisioning Hi Swen, I try rebboting 2 vm but the amount of cpu MHz is not changed. Do I have to restart all vm before you see a change? Il 21/04/2015 16:16, S. Brüseke - proIO GmbH ha scritto: This is because the factor of overprovisioning is attached to the instance too! And this factor is only changing after rebooting the instance. So after a change of cpu.overprovisioning.factor you need to reboot all instances on this cluster which were running before this change was made. Mit freundlichen Grüßen / With kind regards, Swen Brüseke -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: Ugo Vasi [mailto:ugo.v...@procne.it] Gesendet: Dienstag, 21. April 2015 16:06 An: users@cloudstack.apache.orgmailto:users@cloudstack.apache.org Betreff: Re: cpu overprovisioning If I change the over-provisioning ratio in cluster-relative settings (infrastructure-cluser-cluster-name-settings) the dashboard show the sum of real GHz the overprovisioned amount of GHz (324GHz) as aspected, but after a while also the sum of Ghz is multiplied by the same factor making it unnecessary... Il 21/04/2015 15:26, Bharat Kumar ha scritto: In case of cloudstack, cpu capacity for host is total of cpus * no of Ghz * overporvisoning. total capacity = sum of capacities of individual hosts. Thanks, Bharat. On 21-Apr-2015, at 6:49 pm, Abhinandan Prateek abhinandan.prat...@shapeblue.commailto:abhinandan.prat...@shapeblue.com wrote: Available CPU will be 3 times the actual CPU when over provisioned by 3. The UI not showing the over provisioned value seems like a bug. -abhi On 21-Apr-2015, at 6:34 pm, Ugo Vasi ugo.v...@procne.itmailto:ugo.v...@procne.it wrote: Hi all, we have a cluster of three machines with 16 CPU at 2.2GHz each and we have set a cpu-overprovizioning to 3. I would expect that the CPU system capacity of the dashboard appear with the sum of megahertz CPUs multiplied by three instead I get the real sum (108MHz). I do not understand if this overprovisioning allows me to allocate more MHz of real ones asthe documentation say since in reality the virtual machines occupy on average only 20% of the computing power. thanks in advance -- U g o V a s iugo.v...@procne.itmailto:ugo.v...@procne.it P r o c n e s.r.l) via Cotonificio 45 33010 Tavagnacco IT phone: +390432486523 fax: +390432486523 Le informazioni contenute in questo messaggio sono riservate e confidenziali ed è vietata la diffusione in qualunque modo eseguita. Qualora Lei non fosse la persona a cui il presente messaggio è destinato, La invitiamo ad eliminarlo e a non leggerlo, dandocene gentilmente comunicazione. Per qualsiasi informazione si prega di contattare supp...@procne.itmailto:supp...@procne.it . Rif. D.L. 196/2003 Find out more about ShapeBlue and our range of CloudStack related services IaaS Cloud Design Buildhttp://secure-web.cisco.com/1Yol7cn0c4CnDObcpSirV3DCPZ0WVdvOa3L hGNjqR1LC8fdUx8eCLTnMMSoshd9HpKAnV6UPQ_yMd3M-1eZw2Ta-m7j5KgANh1cCgIkU g7gUvZUUMIkYZDZDpYP9IDOTuw6o3kuFAtJGiF0j7g8WWr6r9HIr7CqwJi047V_38MGrr r_r5JkLvVUoDdjYuhuBW/http%3A%2F%2Fshapeblue.comhttp://2Fshapeblue.com%2Fiaas-cloud-design-a nd-build%2F%2F CSForge - rapid IaaS deployment frameworkhttp://secure-web.cisco.com/1QG_8HfqAJxyrN85oTEHIYNcbRgpmjr
Re: cpu overprovisioning
Can we fix the dashboard to reflect the available capacity given an over commit ? On 22-Apr-2015, at 9:56 am, Bharat Kumar bharat.ku...@citrix.com wrote: Also In case of change in the overcommit value the total capacity will change instantaneously, but the used resource and the total available will change when the capacity checker thread runs. The interval at which this will run can be changed from the global settings. Thanks, Bharat. On 22-Apr-2015, at 9:50 am, Bharat Kumar bharat.ku...@citrix.com wrote: Hi, The change in cpu overcommit factor will not change the amount of resource that are available to you. It will change the way you want to use the free resource available at that time. It won’t change what was already allocated. for example if you have deployed the VMs with overcommit say 2 and after a while you change the overcommit to 3, the used resource will be scaled based on the change. changing the overcommit cannot create resource. It can only change the way you want to use the free resource. So now after the change in overcommit you can deploy 3 times more VMs (of a given service offering) than usual using the the resource that is free at the time of changing the overcommit value. The perviously allocated resource cannot be freed until you restart the VMs. This link will tell you how resource allocation calculations are made. https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/CPU+and+RAM+Overcommit Thanks, Bharat. On 21-Apr-2015, at 11:20 pm, Rafael Weingärtner rafaelweingart...@gmail.commailto:rafaelweingart...@gmail.com wrote: I have not looked at the code, but that seems odd. Restarting VMs instances to update the resource usage/resource availability when changing the overprovisioning factor. On Tue, Apr 21, 2015 at 12:51 PM, S. Brüseke - proIO GmbH s.brues...@proio.commailto:s.brues...@proio.com wrote: Please try to stop and start the vm. Maybe reboot is not working here. You should start to see more free CPU after the first vm. Mit freundlichen Grüßen / With kind regards, Swen Brüseke -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: Ugo Vasi [mailto:ugo.v...@procne.it] Gesendet: Dienstag, 21. April 2015 16:40 An: users@cloudstack.apache.orgmailto:users@cloudstack.apache.org Betreff: Re: AW: cpu overprovisioning Hi Swen, I try rebboting 2 vm but the amount of cpu MHz is not changed. Do I have to restart all vm before you see a change? Il 21/04/2015 16:16, S. Brüseke - proIO GmbH ha scritto: This is because the factor of overprovisioning is attached to the instance too! And this factor is only changing after rebooting the instance. So after a change of cpu.overprovisioning.factor you need to reboot all instances on this cluster which were running before this change was made. Mit freundlichen Grüßen / With kind regards, Swen Brüseke -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: Ugo Vasi [mailto:ugo.v...@procne.it] Gesendet: Dienstag, 21. April 2015 16:06 An: users@cloudstack.apache.orgmailto:users@cloudstack.apache.org Betreff: Re: cpu overprovisioning If I change the over-provisioning ratio in cluster-relative settings (infrastructure-cluser-cluster-name-settings) the dashboard show the sum of real GHz the overprovisioned amount of GHz (324GHz) as aspected, but after a while also the sum of Ghz is multiplied by the same factor making it unnecessary... Il 21/04/2015 15:26, Bharat Kumar ha scritto: In case of cloudstack, cpu capacity for host is total of cpus * no of Ghz * overporvisoning. total capacity = sum of capacities of individual hosts. Thanks, Bharat. On 21-Apr-2015, at 6:49 pm, Abhinandan Prateek abhinandan.prat...@shapeblue.commailto:abhinandan.prat...@shapeblue.com wrote: Available CPU will be 3 times the actual CPU when over provisioned by 3. The UI not showing the over provisioned value seems like a bug. -abhi On 21-Apr-2015, at 6:34 pm, Ugo Vasi ugo.v...@procne.itmailto:ugo.v...@procne.it wrote: Hi all, we have a cluster of three machines with 16 CPU at 2.2GHz each and we have set a cpu-overprovizioning to 3. I would expect that the CPU system capacity of the dashboard appear with the sum of megahertz CPUs multiplied by three instead I get the real sum (108MHz). I do not understand if this overprovisioning allows me to allocate more MHz of real ones asthe documentation say since in reality the virtual machines occupy on average only 20% of the computing power. thanks in advance -- U g o V a s iugo.v...@procne.itmailto:ugo.v...@procne.it P r o c n e s.r.l) via Cotonificio 45 33010 Tavagnacco IT phone: +390432486523 fax: +390432486523 Le informazioni contenute in questo messaggio sono riservate e confidenziali ed è vietata la diffusione in qualunque modo eseguita. Qualora Lei non fosse la persona a cui il presente messaggio è destinato, La invitiamo ad eliminarlo e a non leggerlo, dandocene gentilmente comunicazione. Per
RE: XenServer 6.5 - Security Groups
Would it make sense to use nethash or iphash based on the ipset version? In Rohit's change I see that for both XS 6.2 and 6.5 nethash is used. -Original Message- From: Tim Mackey [mailto:tmac...@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, 22 April 2015 0:11 To: users@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: XenServer 6.5 - Security Groups Geoff, I just went through the changelog for ipset, and its a pretty safe bet that's where the problems are. In XenServer 6.2, ipset is version 4.5 while XenServer 6.5 uses ipset version 6.11. With version 5, upstream did a major rewrite of ipset. iptables also changed, but it's not as dramatic. I'm going to try and build with Rohit's change and test tonight or tomorrow. -tim On Tue, Apr 21, 2015 at 2:41 AM, Abhinandan Prateek abhinandan.prat...@shapeblue.com wrote: The security groups are working but with errors. All the recommended settings are in place. In the log files there are many delete failures like: Failed to delete rule log file /var/run/cloud/i-2-4-VM.ip 10.51.212.24-cloud.log:2015-04-17 11:45:08DEBUG [root] Ignoring failure to delete rules for vm i-2-4-VM 10.51.212.24-cloud.log:2015-04-17 11:45:08DEBUG [root] Ignoring failure to delete rules for vm i-2-4-VM 10.51.212.24-cloud.log:2015-04-17 11:45:09DEBUG [root] Ignoring failure to delete ebtables chain for vm i-2-4-VM 10.51.212.24-cloud.log:2015-04-17 11:45:09DEBUG [root] Creating ipset chain i-2-4-VM 10.51.212.24-cloud.log:2015-04-17 11:45:09DEBUG [root] Writing log to /var/run/cloud/i-2-4-VM.log 10.51.212.24-cloud.log:2015-04-17 11:45:09DEBUG [root] Programmed default rules for vm i-2-4-VM 10.51.212.24-cloud.log:2015-04-17 11:45:09DEBUG [root] No change in default info set of vm i-2-4-VM 10.51.212.24-cloud.log:2015-04-17 11:45:09DEBUG [root] Seqno increased from -1 to 17: reprogamming ingress rules for vm i-2-4-VM 10.51.212.24-cloud.log:2015-04-17 11:45:09DEBUG [root] Programming network rules for vm i-2-4-VM seqno=17 numrules=3 signature=fd07c7713376d8906fb71eb8328224ca guestIp=10.170.20.61, update iptables, reason=seqno_change_or_sig_change 10.51.212.24-cloud.log:2015-04-17 11:45:09DEBUG [root] ['iptables', '-I', 'i-2-4-VM', '-p', 'icmp', '--icmp-type', 'any', '-j', 'ACCEPT'] 10.51.212.24-cloud.log:2015-04-17 11:45:09DEBUG [root] ipset chain already existsi-2-4-VM_tcp_22_22 Looks like due to delete failure the subsequent rule change fails to apply ? -abhi On 21-Apr-2015, at 9:56 am, Koushik Das koushik@citrix.com wrote: What is the output of cat /etc/sysctl.conf? Update it as per http://cloudstack-installation.readthedocs.org/en/latest/hypervisor/xenserver.html. If there was an upgrade from XS 6.2 to XS 6.5, then changes to sysctl.conf is not persisted. On 21-Apr-2015, at 6:24 AM, Tim Mackey tmac...@gmail.com wrote: Geoff, was this a fresh install of both XenServer and CloudStack, or was there any post install steps or upgrades? I'm thinking of setting this up and tracing things tomorrow. Might be good to get your logs to compare against what I see. On Apr 20, 2015 3:24 PM, Geoff Higginbottom geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com wrote: FYI we have just re-deployed the environment using ACS 4.4.3 and XenServer 6.2 and now it is all working as expected. We now need to work out if the problem is with ACS 4.5.1 or XenServer 6.5 Regards Geoff Higginbottom D: +44 20 3603 0542 | S: +44 20 3603 0540 | M: +447968161581 geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com -Original Message- From: Geoff Higginbottom [mailto:geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com] Sent: 20 April 2015 17:52 To: users@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: RE: XenServer 6.5 - Security Groups Many thank Somesh Regards Geoff Higginbottom D: +44 20 3603 0542 | S: +44 20 3603 0540 | M: +447968161581 geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com -Original Message- From: Somesh Naidu [mailto:somesh.na...@citrix.com] Sent: 20 April 2015 15:55 To: users@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: RE: XenServer 6.5 - Security Groups I am running 4.5.0. I probably don't use my lab setup that often to encounter these inconsistencies. I will look for any XS hotfixes that have fixes around this area and let you know if I find one. Somesh CloudPlatform Escalations Citrix Systems, Inc. -Original Message- From: Geoff Higginbottom [mailto:geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com] Sent: Monday, April 20, 2015 10:42 AM To: users@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: RE: XenServer 6.5 - Security Groups We are currently testing a 4.5.1 CloudStack deployment with XenServer 6.5 and the Security Groups are very temperamental. Sometimes they allow traffic, sometimes they block it. Lots of errors in the cloud.log file on the XenServer saying failed to update iptables etc Regards Geoff Higginbottom D: +44 20 3603 0542 | S: +44 20 3603
Re: cpu overprovisioning
Also In case of change in the overcommit value the total capacity will change instantaneously, but the used resource and the total available will change when the capacity checker thread runs. The interval at which this will run can be changed from the global settings. Thanks, Bharat. On 22-Apr-2015, at 9:50 am, Bharat Kumar bharat.ku...@citrix.com wrote: Hi, The change in cpu overcommit factor will not change the amount of resource that are available to you. It will change the way you want to use the free resource available at that time. It won’t change what was already allocated. for example if you have deployed the VMs with overcommit say 2 and after a while you change the overcommit to 3, the used resource will be scaled based on the change. changing the overcommit cannot create resource. It can only change the way you want to use the free resource. So now after the change in overcommit you can deploy 3 times more VMs (of a given service offering) than usual using the the resource that is free at the time of changing the overcommit value. The perviously allocated resource cannot be freed until you restart the VMs. This link will tell you how resource allocation calculations are made. https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/CPU+and+RAM+Overcommit Thanks, Bharat. On 21-Apr-2015, at 11:20 pm, Rafael Weingärtner rafaelweingart...@gmail.commailto:rafaelweingart...@gmail.com wrote: I have not looked at the code, but that seems odd. Restarting VMs instances to update the resource usage/resource availability when changing the overprovisioning factor. On Tue, Apr 21, 2015 at 12:51 PM, S. Brüseke - proIO GmbH s.brues...@proio.commailto:s.brues...@proio.com wrote: Please try to stop and start the vm. Maybe reboot is not working here. You should start to see more free CPU after the first vm. Mit freundlichen Grüßen / With kind regards, Swen Brüseke -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: Ugo Vasi [mailto:ugo.v...@procne.it] Gesendet: Dienstag, 21. April 2015 16:40 An: users@cloudstack.apache.orgmailto:users@cloudstack.apache.org Betreff: Re: AW: cpu overprovisioning Hi Swen, I try rebboting 2 vm but the amount of cpu MHz is not changed. Do I have to restart all vm before you see a change? Il 21/04/2015 16:16, S. Brüseke - proIO GmbH ha scritto: This is because the factor of overprovisioning is attached to the instance too! And this factor is only changing after rebooting the instance. So after a change of cpu.overprovisioning.factor you need to reboot all instances on this cluster which were running before this change was made. Mit freundlichen Grüßen / With kind regards, Swen Brüseke -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: Ugo Vasi [mailto:ugo.v...@procne.it] Gesendet: Dienstag, 21. April 2015 16:06 An: users@cloudstack.apache.orgmailto:users@cloudstack.apache.org Betreff: Re: cpu overprovisioning If I change the over-provisioning ratio in cluster-relative settings (infrastructure-cluser-cluster-name-settings) the dashboard show the sum of real GHz the overprovisioned amount of GHz (324GHz) as aspected, but after a while also the sum of Ghz is multiplied by the same factor making it unnecessary... Il 21/04/2015 15:26, Bharat Kumar ha scritto: In case of cloudstack, cpu capacity for host is total of cpus * no of Ghz * overporvisoning. total capacity = sum of capacities of individual hosts. Thanks, Bharat. On 21-Apr-2015, at 6:49 pm, Abhinandan Prateek abhinandan.prat...@shapeblue.commailto:abhinandan.prat...@shapeblue.com wrote: Available CPU will be 3 times the actual CPU when over provisioned by 3. The UI not showing the over provisioned value seems like a bug. -abhi On 21-Apr-2015, at 6:34 pm, Ugo Vasi ugo.v...@procne.itmailto:ugo.v...@procne.it wrote: Hi all, we have a cluster of three machines with 16 CPU at 2.2GHz each and we have set a cpu-overprovizioning to 3. I would expect that the CPU system capacity of the dashboard appear with the sum of megahertz CPUs multiplied by three instead I get the real sum (108MHz). I do not understand if this overprovisioning allows me to allocate more MHz of real ones asthe documentation say since in reality the virtual machines occupy on average only 20% of the computing power. thanks in advance -- U g o V a s iugo.v...@procne.itmailto:ugo.v...@procne.it P r o c n e s.r.l) via Cotonificio 45 33010 Tavagnacco IT phone: +390432486523 fax: +390432486523 Le informazioni contenute in questo messaggio sono riservate e confidenziali ed è vietata la diffusione in qualunque modo eseguita. Qualora Lei non fosse la persona a cui il presente messaggio è destinato, La invitiamo ad eliminarlo e a non leggerlo, dandocene gentilmente comunicazione. Per qualsiasi informazione si prega di contattare supp...@procne.itmailto:supp...@procne.it . Rif. D.L. 196/2003 Find out more about
