Wrapping my mind around networking...
I'm working on a private cloud using cloudstack and im stuck on which networking topology i should chose. Our network is segregated by VLANS and each department has it's own VLAN. I want to add each department into CloudStack as a project and then add users into each project. Each project should have it's own VLAN. So the KVM hosts have two physical NIC's. One dedicated purely for NFS and the other for the rest of the networking. eth0 - General networking, VLAN trunk enabled eth1 - NFS, no VLAN trunking enabled. In the Basic mode i should be able to setup a single physical network with management labeled to eth0, storage labeled to eth1, and guest labeled to br0 (which is attached to eth0). But in this scenario how can i tell each project to tag it's guests traffic to a different VLAN? Advanced mode seems way to complex for what i want to do. I don't need a public network. We have a hardware gateway for that. I don’t need any virtual routers or anything like that as well. I just need a guest to boot tagged to a specific VLAN and the gateway should handle the DHCP and routing.
Re: Wrapping my mind around networking...
On Thu, May 28, 2015 at 11:11 PM, Alex McWhirter alexmcwhir...@triadic.us wrote: I'm working on a private cloud using cloudstack and im stuck on which networking topology i should chose. Our network is segregated by VLANS and each department has it's own VLAN. I want to add each department into CloudStack as a project and then add users into each project. Each project should have it's own VLAN. So the KVM hosts have two physical NIC's. One dedicated purely for NFS and the other for the rest of the networking. eth0 - General networking, VLAN trunk enabled eth1 - NFS, no VLAN trunking enabled. In the Basic mode i should be able to setup a single physical network with management labeled to eth0, storage labeled to eth1, and guest labeled to br0 (which is attached to eth0). But in this scenario how can i tell each project to tag it's guests traffic to a different VLAN? Advanced mode seems way to complex for what i want to do. I don't need a public network. We have a hardware gateway for that. I don’t need any virtual routers or anything like that as well. I just need a guest to boot tagged to a specific VLAN and the gateway should handle the DHCP and routing. Basic network doesn't support multiple isolated networks (AFAIK). You would probably want to check out shared networks in advanced mode, that'll let you use your hardware router etc. I think you still need to provide a small public range for system vms and such, but your tenants won't have to use that, they can rely on shared networks. -- Erik
Re: Wrapping my mind around networking...
On 05/28/2015 05:16 PM, Erik Weber wrote: On Thu, May 28, 2015 at 11:11 PM, Alex McWhirter alexmcwhir...@triadic.us wrote: I'm working on a private cloud using cloudstack and im stuck on which networking topology i should chose. Our network is segregated by VLANS and each department has it's own VLAN. I want to add each department into CloudStack as a project and then add users into each project. Each project should have it's own VLAN. So the KVM hosts have two physical NIC's. One dedicated purely for NFS and the other for the rest of the networking. eth0 - General networking, VLAN trunk enabled eth1 - NFS, no VLAN trunking enabled. In the Basic mode i should be able to setup a single physical network with management labeled to eth0, storage labeled to eth1, and guest labeled to br0 (which is attached to eth0). But in this scenario how can i tell each project to tag it's guests traffic to a different VLAN? Advanced mode seems way to complex for what i want to do. I don't need a public network. We have a hardware gateway for that. I don’t need any virtual routers or anything like that as well. I just need a guest to boot tagged to a specific VLAN and the gateway should handle the DHCP and routing. Basic network doesn't support multiple isolated networks (AFAIK). You would probably want to check out shared networks in advanced mode, that'll let you use your hardware router etc. I think you still need to provide a small public range for system vms and such, but your tenants won't have to use that, they can rely on shared networks. Do i have the wrong idea on what the public network is? Im taking public as in actual public IP space on the internet? Or is it something different like the network the management server uses to talk to the KVM hosts? Essentially how it's setup now it VLAN 2 - Management Server, KVM Hosts, and MySQL VLAN 3 - NFS Servers and Clients VLAN 16 through 128 - Each Departments VLAN The hardware gateway sits on all of these VLAN's and provides DHCP and internet routing.
Re: Wrapping my mind around networking...
So in other words, the public network can be any network that has internet access? I doesn't necessarily have to provide public ip adddress, but at least IP addresses that are routable to the internet? On 05/28/2015 05:35 PM, Erik Weber wrote: On Thu, May 28, 2015 at 11:21 PM, Alex McWhirter alexmcwhir...@triadic.us wrote: On 05/28/2015 05:16 PM, Erik Weber wrote: On Thu, May 28, 2015 at 11:11 PM, Alex McWhirter alexmcwhir...@triadic.us wrote: I'm working on a private cloud using cloudstack and im stuck on which networking topology i should chose. Our network is segregated by VLANS and each department has it's own VLAN. I want to add each department into CloudStack as a project and then add users into each project. Each project should have it's own VLAN. So the KVM hosts have two physical NIC's. One dedicated purely for NFS and the other for the rest of the networking. eth0 - General networking, VLAN trunk enabled eth1 - NFS, no VLAN trunking enabled. In the Basic mode i should be able to setup a single physical network with management labeled to eth0, storage labeled to eth1, and guest labeled to br0 (which is attached to eth0). But in this scenario how can i tell each project to tag it's guests traffic to a different VLAN? Advanced mode seems way to complex for what i want to do. I don't need a public network. We have a hardware gateway for that. I don’t need any virtual routers or anything like that as well. I just need a guest to boot tagged to a specific VLAN and the gateway should handle the DHCP and routing. Basic network doesn't support multiple isolated networks (AFAIK). You would probably want to check out shared networks in advanced mode, that'll let you use your hardware router etc. I think you still need to provide a small public range for system vms and such, but your tenants won't have to use that, they can rely on shared networks. Do i have the wrong idea on what the public network is? Im taking public as in actual public IP space on the internet? Or is it something different like the network the management server uses to talk to the KVM hosts? Just to clarify why there is a distinct public network - not all companies/organizations/whatever allow internet access from (all) their networks. This way we're able to ensure that those VMs who needs it, usually system vms and routers, have internet access, while things like management and storage networks doesn't require that access.
Re: Wrapping my mind around networking...
Correct. Public netowrk,is the one attached to VR, SSVM, CPVM (public NIC inside these system VMs) On 29 May 2015 at 00:04, Alex McWhirter alexmcwhir...@triadic.us wrote: So in other words, the public network can be any network that has internet access? I doesn't necessarily have to provide public ip adddress, but at least IP addresses that are routable to the internet? On 05/28/2015 05:35 PM, Erik Weber wrote: On Thu, May 28, 2015 at 11:21 PM, Alex McWhirter alexmcwhir...@triadic.us wrote: On 05/28/2015 05:16 PM, Erik Weber wrote: On Thu, May 28, 2015 at 11:11 PM, Alex McWhirter alexmcwhir...@triadic.us wrote: I'm working on a private cloud using cloudstack and im stuck on which networking topology i should chose. Our network is segregated by VLANS and each department has it's own VLAN. I want to add each department into CloudStack as a project and then add users into each project. Each project should have it's own VLAN. So the KVM hosts have two physical NIC's. One dedicated purely for NFS and the other for the rest of the networking. eth0 - General networking, VLAN trunk enabled eth1 - NFS, no VLAN trunking enabled. In the Basic mode i should be able to setup a single physical network with management labeled to eth0, storage labeled to eth1, and guest labeled to br0 (which is attached to eth0). But in this scenario how can i tell each project to tag it's guests traffic to a different VLAN? Advanced mode seems way to complex for what i want to do. I don't need a public network. We have a hardware gateway for that. I don’t need any virtual routers or anything like that as well. I just need a guest to boot tagged to a specific VLAN and the gateway should handle the DHCP and routing. Basic network doesn't support multiple isolated networks (AFAIK). You would probably want to check out shared networks in advanced mode, that'll let you use your hardware router etc. I think you still need to provide a small public range for system vms and such, but your tenants won't have to use that, they can rely on shared networks. Do i have the wrong idea on what the public network is? Im taking public as in actual public IP space on the internet? Or is it something different like the network the management server uses to talk to the KVM hosts? Just to clarify why there is a distinct public network - not all companies/organizations/whatever allow internet access from (all) their networks. This way we're able to ensure that those VMs who needs it, usually system vms and routers, have internet access, while things like management and storage networks doesn't require that access. -- Andrija Panić
Re: Wrapping my mind around networking...
On Fri, May 29, 2015 at 12:04 AM, Alex McWhirter alexmcwhir...@triadic.us wrote: So in other words, the public network can be any network that has internet access? I doesn't necessarily have to provide public ip adddress, but at least IP addresses that are routable to the internet? Yes. Your cloudstack users should probably have access to those IP addresses. Note that if you plan on using regular isolated networks (ie. not shared networks), they will use one or more IP addresses from the public pool, and should be available to the end users. -- Erik
RE: Cloudstack 4.3.2 with KVM system template from shapeblue not supported by qemu version
Thanks Rohit Andrija, I hereby confirm that the command sent by Andrija worked fine and the template spinned on Centos 6.6, after running the following command from Ubuntu 14 qemu-img convert -f qcow2 systemvm64template-4.3-kvm.qcow2 -O qcow2 -o compat=0.10 systemvm64template-4.3-kvm.qcowold -Original Message- From: Rohit Yadav [mailto:rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com] Sent: Wednesday, May 27, 2015 10:45 PM To: users@cloudstack.apache.org Cc: d...@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: Cloudstack 4.3.2 with KVM system template from shapeblue not supported by qemu version I’ll fix our 4.3 systemvm template to be compatible with older versions. This has been fixed for 4.4 and 4.5. On 26-May-2015, at 10:30 am, Andrija Panic andrija.pa...@gmail.com wrote: Just convert the template (use some newer ubuntu version of qemu-img) to qcow2 version 2... They provide qcow2 version 3, you need version 2 for centos something like (but please google and confirm): qemu-img convert -f qcow2 /var/lib/libvirt/images/qcow2v3.img -O qcow2 -o compat=0.10 /var/lib/libvirt/images/qcow2v2.img On 26 May 2015 at 05:09, Amin Samir amin.sa...@opencloud.net.au wrote: Hello, We are using Cloudstack 4.3.2 from shapeblue repo, along with KVM template dated 2015-01-28, our environment is as follows: 1) Cloud stack management server Centos 6.6, with Cloudstack 4.3.2 2) Centos 6.6 KVM with the cloudstack-agent installed from shapeblue repo 3) FreeNAS 9.3 for NFS primary secondary storage. 4) Advanced zone We have configured cloubr0 on eth0 in a single physical network, modified the labels during the zone launch to match the bridge names on the host. However System vm cannot launch due the following error in the agent: uses a qcow2 feature which is not supported by this qemu version: QCOW version 3 Anyone please help with this issue, shall we use another system template. Thanks in advance. -- Andrija Panić Regards, Rohit Yadav Software Architect, ShapeBlue M. +91 88 262 30892 | rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com Blog: bhaisaab.org | Twitter: @_bhaisaab Find out more about ShapeBlue and our range of CloudStack related services IaaS Cloud Design Buildhttp://shapeblue.com/iaas-cloud-design-and-build// CSForge – rapid IaaS deployment frameworkhttp://shapeblue.com/csforge/ CloudStack Consultinghttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-consultancy/ CloudStack Software Engineeringhttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-software-engineering/ CloudStack Infrastructure Supporthttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-infrastructure-support/ CloudStack Bootcamp Training Courseshttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/ This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any views or opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Shape Blue Ltd or related companies. If you are not the intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any action based upon its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please contact the sender if you believe you have received this email in error. Shape Blue Ltd is a company incorporated in England Wales. ShapeBlue Services India LLP is a company incorporated in India and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. Shape Blue Brasil Consultoria Ltda is a company incorporated in Brasil and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue SA Pty Ltd is a company registered by The Republic of South Africa and is traded under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue is a registered trademark.
Change Cluster pool master
Hello, I want just to be sure. Is it safe change running cluster's XenServer's pool master (xe pool-designate-new-master host-uuid=uuid)? In XenServer pool without CloudStack it works great and without issues, but how about with CloudStack?
Re: Change Cluster pool master
Hi, What versions are you running? There's been some changes regarding electing of master in newer versions to rely on XenServer HA instead of CloudStack electing a new master so you might take a look at this good article from Remi: http://blog.remibergsma.com/2015/05/23/making-xenserver-and-cloudstack-sing-and-dance-together-again/ Shouldn't be a problem if you're running one of those CloudStack versions. At least I haven't experienced any problems doing this previously. -thinktwo
system VMs on local storage
Hi, we are thinking about to use only local storage in our CS installation. We are using XenServer 6.2 SP1 as hypervisor. What about System VMs? Is it okay to change system.vm.use.local.storage to true and then migrate all System VMs and Router VMs to local storage? Is it wise to put System VMs on local storage? Thank for sharing your experience! Mit freundlichen Grüßen / With kind regards, Swen Brüseke - proIO GmbH - Geschäftsführer: Swen Brüseke Sitz der Gesellschaft: Frankfurt am Main USt-IdNr. DE 267 075 918 Registergericht: Frankfurt am Main - HRB 86239 Diese E-Mail enthält vertrauliche und/oder rechtlich geschützte Informationen. Wenn Sie nicht der richtige Adressat sind oder diese E-Mail irrtümlich erhalten haben, informieren Sie bitte sofort den Absender und vernichten Sie diese Mail. Das unerlaubte Kopieren sowie die unbefugte Weitergabe dieser Mail sind nicht gestattet. This e-mail may contain confidential and/or privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient (or have received this e-mail in error) please notify the sender immediately and destroy this e-mail. Any unauthorized copying, disclosure or distribution of the material in this e-mail is strictly forbidden.
AW: system VMs on local storage
Hi Glenn, will CS create the SystemVMs after a XenServer failure automatically? We do not want to use shared storage at all. Mit freundlichen Grüßen / With kind regards, Swen Brüseke -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: Glenn Wagner [mailto:glenn.wag...@shapeblue.com] Gesendet: Donnerstag, 28. Mai 2015 11:13 An: users@cloudstack.apache.org; S. Brüseke - proIO GmbH Betreff: RE: system VMs on local storage Hi, I honestly would not put the System VM's on local Storage on a Production environment, if you have a Xenserver failure the System VM's will go down, You will need to recreate them causing downtime. Glenn Wagner Senior Consultant, South Africa Phone: +27 21 527 0091 | Mobile: +27 73 917 4111 glenn.wag...@shapeblue.com | www.shapeblue.com | Twitter:@shapeBlue ShapeBlue SA (Pty) Ltd, 2nd Floor, Oudehuis Centre, 122 Main Rd, Somerset West, Cape Town 7130 -Original Message- From: S. Brüseke - proIO GmbH [mailto:s.brues...@proio.com] Sent: 28 May 2015 10:58 AM To: users@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: system VMs on local storage Hi, we are thinking about to use only local storage in our CS installation. We are using XenServer 6.2 SP1 as hypervisor. What about System VMs? Is it okay to change system.vm.use.local.storage to true and then migrate all System VMs and Router VMs to local storage? Is it wise to put System VMs on local storage? Thank for sharing your experience! Mit freundlichen Grüßen / With kind regards, Swen Brüseke - proIO GmbH - Geschäftsführer: Swen Brüseke Sitz der Gesellschaft: Frankfurt am Main USt-IdNr. DE 267 075 918 Registergericht: Frankfurt am Main - HRB 86239 Diese E-Mail enthält vertrauliche und/oder rechtlich geschützte Informationen. Wenn Sie nicht der richtige Adressat sind oder diese E-Mail irrtümlich erhalten haben, informieren Sie bitte sofort den Absender und vernichten Sie diese Mail. Das unerlaubte Kopieren sowie die unbefugte Weitergabe dieser Mail sind nicht gestattet. This e-mail may contain confidential and/or privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient (or have received this e-mail in error) please notify the sender immediately and destroy this e-mail. Any unauthorized copying, disclosure or distribution of the material in this e-mail is strictly forbidden. Find out more about ShapeBlue and our range of CloudStack related services IaaS Cloud Design Buildhttp://shapeblue.com/iaas-cloud-design-and-build// CSForge – rapid IaaS deployment frameworkhttp://shapeblue.com/csforge/ CloudStack Consultinghttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-consultancy/ CloudStack Software Engineeringhttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-software-engineering/ CloudStack Infrastructure Supporthttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-infrastructure-support/ CloudStack Bootcamp Training Courseshttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/ This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any views or opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Shape Blue Ltd or related companies. If you are not the intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any action based upon its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please contact the sender if you believe you have received this email in error. Shape Blue Ltd is a company incorporated in England Wales. ShapeBlue Services India LLP is a company incorporated in India and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. Shape Blue Brasil Consultoria Ltda is a company incorporated in Brasil and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue SA Pty Ltd is a company registered by The Republic of South Africa and is traded under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue is a registered trademark. - proIO GmbH - Geschäftsführer: Swen Brüseke Sitz der Gesellschaft: Frankfurt am Main USt-IdNr. DE 267 075 918 Registergericht: Frankfurt am Main - HRB 86239 Diese E-Mail enthält vertrauliche und/oder rechtlich geschützte Informationen. Wenn Sie nicht der richtige Adressat sind oder diese E-Mail irrtümlich erhalten haben, informieren Sie bitte sofort den Absender und vernichten Sie diese Mail. Das unerlaubte Kopieren sowie die unbefugte Weitergabe dieser Mail sind nicht gestattet. This e-mail may contain confidential and/or privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient (or have received this e-mail in error) please notify the sender immediately and destroy this e-mail. Any unauthorized copying, disclosure or distribution of the material in this e-mail is strictly forbidden.
AW: AW: system VMs on local storage
thank you! So it would make sense to keep a nfs shared storage only for SystemVMs? Can we use our secondary storage for this? Mit freundlichen Grüßen / With kind regards, Swen Brüseke proIO GmbH Kleyerstr. 79 - 89 / Tor 13 D-60326 Frankfurt am Main Mail: s.brues...@proio.com Tel: +(49) (0) 69 739049-15 Fax: +(49) (0) 69 739049-25 Web: www.proio.com - Support - Mail: supp...@proio.com 24h: +(49) (0) 1805 522 855 -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: Prashant Kumar Mishra [mailto:prashantkumar.mis...@citrix.com] Gesendet: Donnerstag, 28. Mai 2015 14:59 An: users@cloudstack.apache.org Betreff: Re: AW: system VMs on local storage 1-To recreate router vm you need to stop-start any existing vm or deploy a new vm . 2-In case if you are changing storage(shared to local or local to share) you need to destroy existing router vm and follow step 1. On 5/28/15, 6:12 PM, S. Brüseke - proIO GmbH s.brues...@proio.com wrote: How do you recreate VRs? Mit freundlichen Grüßen / With kind regards, Swen Brüseke -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: Koushik Das [mailto:koushik@citrix.com] Gesendet: Donnerstag, 28. Mai 2015 14:30 An: users@cloudstack.apache.org Betreff: Re: system VMs on local storage SSVM and CPVM will be started simultaneously. But virtual routers won't get created automatically. On 28-May-2015, at 5:51 PM, S. Brüseke - proIO GmbH s.brues...@proio.com wrote: Hi Prashant, so the only downside is that it will take some time until CS created all SystemVMs after a host crash? Will CS create SystemVMs one by one? Mit freundlichen Grüßen / With kind regards, Swen Brüseke -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: Prashant Kumar Mishra [mailto:prashantkumar.mis...@citrix.com] Gesendet: Donnerstag, 28. Mai 2015 14:12 An: users@cloudstack.apache.org Betreff: Re: AW: system VMs on local storage Yes , if your zone is in enabled state and system vm went down , CS will try to bring them up on shared/local storage depend on current system.vm.use.local.storage settings . On 5/28/15, 5:19 PM, S. Brüseke - proIO GmbH s.brues...@proio.com wrote: Hi Glenn, will CS create the SystemVMs after a XenServer failure automatically? We do not want to use shared storage at all. Mit freundlichen Grüßen / With kind regards, Swen Brüseke -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: Glenn Wagner [mailto:glenn.wag...@shapeblue.com] Gesendet: Donnerstag, 28. Mai 2015 11:13 An: users@cloudstack.apache.org; S. Brüseke - proIO GmbH Betreff: RE: system VMs on local storage Hi, I honestly would not put the System VM's on local Storage on a Production environment, if you have a Xenserver failure the System VM's will go down, You will need to recreate them causing downtime. Glenn Wagner Senior Consultant, South Africa Phone: +27 21 527 0091 | Mobile: +27 73 917 4111 glenn.wag...@shapeblue.com | www.shapeblue.com | Twitter:@shapeBlue ShapeBlue SA (Pty) Ltd, 2nd Floor, Oudehuis Centre, 122 Main Rd, Somerset West, Cape Town 7130 -Original Message- From: S. Brüseke - proIO GmbH [mailto:s.brues...@proio.com] Sent: 28 May 2015 10:58 AM To: users@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: system VMs on local storage Hi, we are thinking about to use only local storage in our CS installation. We are using XenServer 6.2 SP1 as hypervisor. What about System VMs? Is it okay to change system.vm.use.local.storage to true and then migrate all System VMs and Router VMs to local storage? Is it wise to put System VMs on local storage? Thank for sharing your experience! Mit freundlichen Grüßen / With kind regards, Swen Brüseke - proIO GmbH - Geschäftsführer: Swen Brüseke Sitz der Gesellschaft: Frankfurt am Main USt-IdNr. DE 267 075 918 Registergericht: Frankfurt am Main - HRB 86239 Diese E-Mail enthält vertrauliche und/oder rechtlich geschützte Informationen. Wenn Sie nicht der richtige Adressat sind oder diese E-Mail irrtümlich erhalten haben, informieren Sie bitte sofort den Absender und vernichten Sie diese Mail. Das unerlaubte Kopieren sowie die unbefugte Weitergabe dieser Mail sind nicht gestattet. This e-mail may contain confidential and/or privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient (or have received this e-mail in error) please notify the sender immediately and destroy this e-mail. Any unauthorized copying, disclosure or distribution of the material in this e-mail is strictly forbidden. Find out more about ShapeBlue and our range of CloudStack related services IaaS Cloud Design Buildhttp://secure-web.cisco.com/1dYmNXcpqRQ4xMQy8yCKTrGSQaWN6hV3Cu o Ig 11a tTedR7-uxNmPD5eRyhs9cqh-RJ__Q9a5GlyOpZv6fZdddcg0OzTeAwpLrvQxK3BIQGTe e sv IvS r6VYLK_-KkXUlV6J6lRwaLZDlCKv8EvEQgDo2tz7k-MM84I94oI3Vj1Gb24JeHSV6g38 n wp ANW JekyS/http%3A%2F%2Fshapeblue.com%2Fiaas-cloud-design-and-build%2F%2F CSForge rapid IaaS deployment
Re: Change Cluster pool master
Hi, The commit was added to the 4.3 branch on Dec 3, 2014: https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;h=305d8ae CloudStack 4.3.2 was released in January 2015, so I would say it was included. https://blogs.apache.org/cloudstack/entry/announce_announcing_apache_cloudstack_4 Since XenServer itself is handling HA on the pool, I'd say you can safely run 'xe pool-designate-new-master' to elect a new master. CloudStack will pick this up automatically. Regards, Remi 2015-05-28 9:33 GMT+02:00 Mārtiņš Jakubovičs mart...@vertigs.lv: I am running ASC 4.3.2 and XenServer 6.2 with XS62ESP1013 patch. On 2015.05.28. 10:30, Glenn Wagner wrote: Hello, What version of Xenserver and Cloudstack are you running? Glenn Wagner Senior Consultant, South Africa Phone: +27 21 527 0091 | Mobile: +27 73 917 4111 glenn.wag...@shapeblue.com | www.shapeblue.com | Twitter:@shapeBlue ShapeBlue SA (Pty) Ltd, 2nd Floor, Oudehuis Centre, 122 Main Rd, Somerset West, Cape Town 7130 -Original Message- From: Mārtiņš Jakubovičs [mailto:mart...@vertigs.lv] Sent: 28 May 2015 09:09 AM To: users@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Change Cluster pool master Hello, I want just to be sure. Is it safe change running cluster's XenServer's pool master (xe pool-designate-new-master host-uuid=uuid)? In XenServer pool without CloudStack it works great and without issues, but how about with CloudStack? Find out more about ShapeBlue and our range of CloudStack related services IaaS Cloud Design Build http://shapeblue.com/iaas-cloud-design-and-build// CSForge – rapid IaaS deployment frameworkhttp://shapeblue.com/csforge/ CloudStack Consultinghttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-consultancy/ CloudStack Software Engineering http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-software-engineering/ CloudStack Infrastructure Support http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-infrastructure-support/ CloudStack Bootcamp Training Courses http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/ This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any views or opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Shape Blue Ltd or related companies. If you are not the intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any action based upon its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please contact the sender if you believe you have received this email in error. Shape Blue Ltd is a company incorporated in England Wales. ShapeBlue Services India LLP is a company incorporated in India and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. Shape Blue Brasil Consultoria Ltda is a company incorporated in Brasil and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue SA Pty Ltd is a company registered by The Republic of South Africa and is traded under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue is a registered trademark.
Re: Change Cluster pool master
Thanks! On 2015.05.28. 15:09, Remi Bergsma wrote: Hi, The commit was added to the 4.3 branch on Dec 3, 2014: https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;h=305d8ae CloudStack 4.3.2 was released in January 2015, so I would say it was included. https://blogs.apache.org/cloudstack/entry/announce_announcing_apache_cloudstack_4 Since XenServer itself is handling HA on the pool, I'd say you can safely run 'xe pool-designate-new-master' to elect a new master. CloudStack will pick this up automatically. Regards, Remi 2015-05-28 9:33 GMT+02:00 Mārtiņš Jakubovičs mart...@vertigs.lv: I am running ASC 4.3.2 and XenServer 6.2 with XS62ESP1013 patch. On 2015.05.28. 10:30, Glenn Wagner wrote: Hello, What version of Xenserver and Cloudstack are you running? Glenn Wagner Senior Consultant, South Africa Phone: +27 21 527 0091 | Mobile: +27 73 917 4111 glenn.wag...@shapeblue.com | www.shapeblue.com | Twitter:@shapeBlue ShapeBlue SA (Pty) Ltd, 2nd Floor, Oudehuis Centre, 122 Main Rd, Somerset West, Cape Town 7130 -Original Message- From: Mārtiņš Jakubovičs [mailto:mart...@vertigs.lv] Sent: 28 May 2015 09:09 AM To: users@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Change Cluster pool master Hello, I want just to be sure. Is it safe change running cluster's XenServer's pool master (xe pool-designate-new-master host-uuid=uuid)? In XenServer pool without CloudStack it works great and without issues, but how about with CloudStack? Find out more about ShapeBlue and our range of CloudStack related services IaaS Cloud Design Build http://shapeblue.com/iaas-cloud-design-and-build// CSForge – rapid IaaS deployment frameworkhttp://shapeblue.com/csforge/ CloudStack Consultinghttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-consultancy/ CloudStack Software Engineering http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-software-engineering/ CloudStack Infrastructure Support http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-infrastructure-support/ CloudStack Bootcamp Training Courses http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/ This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any views or opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Shape Blue Ltd or related companies. If you are not the intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any action based upon its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please contact the sender if you believe you have received this email in error. Shape Blue Ltd is a company incorporated in England Wales. ShapeBlue Services India LLP is a company incorporated in India and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. Shape Blue Brasil Consultoria Ltda is a company incorporated in Brasil and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue SA Pty Ltd is a company registered by The Republic of South Africa and is traded under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue is a registered trademark.
Re: AW: system VMs on local storage
Yes , if your zone is in enabled state and system vm went down , CS will try to bring them up on shared/local storage depend on current system.vm.use.local.storage settings . On 5/28/15, 5:19 PM, S. Brüseke - proIO GmbH s.brues...@proio.com wrote: Hi Glenn, will CS create the SystemVMs after a XenServer failure automatically? We do not want to use shared storage at all. Mit freundlichen Grüßen / With kind regards, Swen Brüseke -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: Glenn Wagner [mailto:glenn.wag...@shapeblue.com] Gesendet: Donnerstag, 28. Mai 2015 11:13 An: users@cloudstack.apache.org; S. Brüseke - proIO GmbH Betreff: RE: system VMs on local storage Hi, I honestly would not put the System VM's on local Storage on a Production environment, if you have a Xenserver failure the System VM's will go down, You will need to recreate them causing downtime. Glenn Wagner Senior Consultant, South Africa Phone: +27 21 527 0091 | Mobile: +27 73 917 4111 glenn.wag...@shapeblue.com | www.shapeblue.com | Twitter:@shapeBlue ShapeBlue SA (Pty) Ltd, 2nd Floor, Oudehuis Centre, 122 Main Rd, Somerset West, Cape Town 7130 -Original Message- From: S. Brüseke - proIO GmbH [mailto:s.brues...@proio.com] Sent: 28 May 2015 10:58 AM To: users@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: system VMs on local storage Hi, we are thinking about to use only local storage in our CS installation. We are using XenServer 6.2 SP1 as hypervisor. What about System VMs? Is it okay to change system.vm.use.local.storage to true and then migrate all System VMs and Router VMs to local storage? Is it wise to put System VMs on local storage? Thank for sharing your experience! Mit freundlichen Grüßen / With kind regards, Swen Brüseke - proIO GmbH - Geschäftsführer: Swen Brüseke Sitz der Gesellschaft: Frankfurt am Main USt-IdNr. DE 267 075 918 Registergericht: Frankfurt am Main - HRB 86239 Diese E-Mail enthält vertrauliche und/oder rechtlich geschützte Informationen. Wenn Sie nicht der richtige Adressat sind oder diese E-Mail irrtümlich erhalten haben, informieren Sie bitte sofort den Absender und vernichten Sie diese Mail. Das unerlaubte Kopieren sowie die unbefugte Weitergabe dieser Mail sind nicht gestattet. This e-mail may contain confidential and/or privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient (or have received this e-mail in error) please notify the sender immediately and destroy this e-mail. Any unauthorized copying, disclosure or distribution of the material in this e-mail is strictly forbidden. Find out more about ShapeBlue and our range of CloudStack related services IaaS Cloud Design Buildhttp://secure-web.cisco.com/1dYmNXcpqRQ4xMQy8yCKTrGSQaWN6hV3CuoIg11a tTedR7-uxNmPD5eRyhs9cqh-RJ__Q9a5GlyOpZv6fZdddcg0OzTeAwpLrvQxK3BIQGTeesvIvS r6VYLK_-KkXUlV6J6lRwaLZDlCKv8EvEQgDo2tz7k-MM84I94oI3Vj1Gb24JeHSV6g38nwpANW JekyS/http%3A%2F%2Fshapeblue.com%2Fiaas-cloud-design-and-build%2F%2F CSForge rapid IaaS deployment frameworkhttp://secure-web.cisco.com/1c3DThpdAoMLpcII1DUg4mb77LEBA8F47u6r _3GRCRkgV7i8PzG1Y5Y0XmXhnvTaXXy-lPJKaS0bZGnLc40yXglmoSo5ETEKKOW0Zr45ZFTXao QtOF6JrMMKIF-EzLy4LLsb0my3uHt6xrUlvPspMsY47e-7AZO1uxdrRrM5vYNpmrj3JHkDsn1k 0beubo5Mp/http%3A%2F%2Fshapeblue.com%2Fcsforge%2F CloudStack Consultinghttp://secure-web.cisco.com/1_IL8Rn9bKuPzhdLeJKPw2Ej4Kr2BCDuYMl U7I1pHQCnxmKmrAuRwp6qoIHRQdQc0Vu7Ql1RGVb1BkO8dyTricX8p7w-wN9nuDcecE-FgEXte 7pF9ddfZV_BRO4y2RkbMp8fe05TFRNmzoNQITeQZ2ztjU-5EgAk20qetQZeqxfE3Kqrt4HdC2a kdrUI6Ph4E/http%3A%2F%2Fshapeblue.com%2Fcloudstack-consultancy%2F CloudStack Software Engineeringhttp://secure-web.cisco.com/138uz6eUEWimRjLZUGUdElT3G29pRsqBVF 9ILB39CNDFAq5H-DCSgHcURR69gu2YvPgsr9bqqP0hwMbT6GvRBkWyLkqLsQgCjr3O25isxzcL 3qWrozWWCUinjhJ4YBwN_pUS0qJlDHWgY7FPfhDjveaY4Olo9W8jv7--bIrlsf9ESbyRbgNmmN tectVP5i2ul/http%3A%2F%2Fshapeblue.com%2Fcloudstack-software-engineering%2 F CloudStack Infrastructure Supporthttp://secure-web.cisco.com/11EBpBbT6Pgt-_ei9szQxDq74yMhUaXJP0C9Fr DWdCS0BL8x8yBi-alFE2EusPeJprg6GZHUQ6026IYhBpZeDfmLUQlANyN70XBbXFhZ23Yxe17v qDRu-fbzcpExdZirjsp3I5SWOY5b7Nzn-kVjSgHa5sGlcJUtUZrVkRghl7yHAxqSVODAhebnpy TkPXE8w/http%3A%2F%2Fshapeblue.com%2Fcloudstack-infrastructure-support%2F CloudStack Bootcamp Training Courseshttp://secure-web.cisco.com/1j_s3pZ4AyTCLWjFpmvOAq76V6KZfUhiwdT0Dp y6Kf9wggW63JYjZWebwZwBf_iOZo-DQyrWy6VFGIMFzJNEUnH8IPoV7itBSAn7wvG2BlPkH2om pe0tdiXuU2_kOCGoyT4DJSAzECe3HirB_H_3A3IKQYUIXLtJFevlLHe4OEbXGtizArkn-OHejk OcjCgIb/http%3A%2F%2Fshapeblue.com%2Fcloudstack-training%2F This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any views or opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Shape Blue Ltd or related companies. If you are not the intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any action based upon its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please contact the sender if you believe you have received this email in error. Shape
Re: system VMs on local storage
SSVM and CPVM will be started simultaneously. But virtual routers won't get created automatically. On 28-May-2015, at 5:51 PM, S. Brüseke - proIO GmbH s.brues...@proio.com wrote: Hi Prashant, so the only downside is that it will take some time until CS created all SystemVMs after a host crash? Will CS create SystemVMs one by one? Mit freundlichen Grüßen / With kind regards, Swen Brüseke -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: Prashant Kumar Mishra [mailto:prashantkumar.mis...@citrix.com] Gesendet: Donnerstag, 28. Mai 2015 14:12 An: users@cloudstack.apache.org Betreff: Re: AW: system VMs on local storage Yes , if your zone is in enabled state and system vm went down , CS will try to bring them up on shared/local storage depend on current system.vm.use.local.storage settings . On 5/28/15, 5:19 PM, S. Brüseke - proIO GmbH s.brues...@proio.com wrote: Hi Glenn, will CS create the SystemVMs after a XenServer failure automatically? We do not want to use shared storage at all. Mit freundlichen Grüßen / With kind regards, Swen Brüseke -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: Glenn Wagner [mailto:glenn.wag...@shapeblue.com] Gesendet: Donnerstag, 28. Mai 2015 11:13 An: users@cloudstack.apache.org; S. Brüseke - proIO GmbH Betreff: RE: system VMs on local storage Hi, I honestly would not put the System VM's on local Storage on a Production environment, if you have a Xenserver failure the System VM's will go down, You will need to recreate them causing downtime. Glenn Wagner Senior Consultant, South Africa Phone: +27 21 527 0091 | Mobile: +27 73 917 4111 glenn.wag...@shapeblue.com | www.shapeblue.com | Twitter:@shapeBlue ShapeBlue SA (Pty) Ltd, 2nd Floor, Oudehuis Centre, 122 Main Rd, Somerset West, Cape Town 7130 -Original Message- From: S. Brüseke - proIO GmbH [mailto:s.brues...@proio.com] Sent: 28 May 2015 10:58 AM To: users@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: system VMs on local storage Hi, we are thinking about to use only local storage in our CS installation. We are using XenServer 6.2 SP1 as hypervisor. What about System VMs? Is it okay to change system.vm.use.local.storage to true and then migrate all System VMs and Router VMs to local storage? Is it wise to put System VMs on local storage? Thank for sharing your experience! Mit freundlichen Grüßen / With kind regards, Swen Brüseke - proIO GmbH - Geschäftsführer: Swen Brüseke Sitz der Gesellschaft: Frankfurt am Main USt-IdNr. DE 267 075 918 Registergericht: Frankfurt am Main - HRB 86239 Diese E-Mail enthält vertrauliche und/oder rechtlich geschützte Informationen. Wenn Sie nicht der richtige Adressat sind oder diese E-Mail irrtümlich erhalten haben, informieren Sie bitte sofort den Absender und vernichten Sie diese Mail. Das unerlaubte Kopieren sowie die unbefugte Weitergabe dieser Mail sind nicht gestattet. This e-mail may contain confidential and/or privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient (or have received this e-mail in error) please notify the sender immediately and destroy this e-mail. Any unauthorized copying, disclosure or distribution of the material in this e-mail is strictly forbidden. Find out more about ShapeBlue and our range of CloudStack related services IaaS Cloud Design Buildhttp://secure-web.cisco.com/1dYmNXcpqRQ4xMQy8yCKTrGSQaWN6hV3CuoIg 11a tTedR7-uxNmPD5eRyhs9cqh-RJ__Q9a5GlyOpZv6fZdddcg0OzTeAwpLrvQxK3BIQGTeesv IvS r6VYLK_-KkXUlV6J6lRwaLZDlCKv8EvEQgDo2tz7k-MM84I94oI3Vj1Gb24JeHSV6g38nwp ANW JekyS/http%3A%2F%2Fshapeblue.com%2Fiaas-cloud-design-and-build%2F%2F CSForge rapid IaaS deployment frameworkhttp://secure-web.cisco.com/1c3DThpdAoMLpcII1DUg4mb77LEBA8F47 u6r _3GRCRkgV7i8PzG1Y5Y0XmXhnvTaXXy-lPJKaS0bZGnLc40yXglmoSo5ETEKKOW0Zr45ZFT Xao QtOF6JrMMKIF-EzLy4LLsb0my3uHt6xrUlvPspMsY47e-7AZO1uxdrRrM5vYNpmrj3JHkDs n1k 0beubo5Mp/http%3A%2F%2Fshapeblue.com%2Fcsforge%2F CloudStack Consultinghttp://secure-web.cisco.com/1_IL8Rn9bKuPzhdLeJKPw2Ej4Kr2BCDu YMl U7I1pHQCnxmKmrAuRwp6qoIHRQdQc0Vu7Ql1RGVb1BkO8dyTricX8p7w-wN9nuDcecE-FgE Xte 7pF9ddfZV_BRO4y2RkbMp8fe05TFRNmzoNQITeQZ2ztjU-5EgAk20qetQZeqxfE3Kqrt4Hd C2a kdrUI6Ph4E/http%3A%2F%2Fshapeblue.com%2Fcloudstack-consultancy%2F CloudStack Software Engineeringhttp://secure-web.cisco.com/138uz6eUEWimRjLZUGUdElT3G29pRsq BVF 9ILB39CNDFAq5H-DCSgHcURR69gu2YvPgsr9bqqP0hwMbT6GvRBkWyLkqLsQgCjr3O25isx zcL 3qWrozWWCUinjhJ4YBwN_pUS0qJlDHWgY7FPfhDjveaY4Olo9W8jv7--bIrlsf9ESbyRbgN mmN tectVP5i2ul/http%3A%2F%2Fshapeblue.com%2Fcloudstack-software-engineerin g%2 F CloudStack Infrastructure Supporthttp://secure-web.cisco.com/11EBpBbT6Pgt-_ei9szQxDq74yMhUaXJP0C 9Fr DWdCS0BL8x8yBi-alFE2EusPeJprg6GZHUQ6026IYhBpZeDfmLUQlANyN70XBbXFhZ23Yxe 17v qDRu-fbzcpExdZirjsp3I5SWOY5b7Nzn-kVjSgHa5sGlcJUtUZrVkRghl7yHAxqSVODAheb npy TkPXE8w/http%3A%2F%2Fshapeblue.com%2Fcloudstack-infrastructure-support% 2F CloudStack
Re: AW: system VMs on local storage
1-To recreate router vm you need to stop-start any existing vm or deploy a new vm . 2-In case if you are changing storage(shared to local or local to share) you need to destroy existing router vm and follow step 1. On 5/28/15, 6:12 PM, S. Brüseke - proIO GmbH s.brues...@proio.com wrote: How do you recreate VRs? Mit freundlichen Grüßen / With kind regards, Swen Brüseke -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: Koushik Das [mailto:koushik@citrix.com] Gesendet: Donnerstag, 28. Mai 2015 14:30 An: users@cloudstack.apache.org Betreff: Re: system VMs on local storage SSVM and CPVM will be started simultaneously. But virtual routers won't get created automatically. On 28-May-2015, at 5:51 PM, S. Brüseke - proIO GmbH s.brues...@proio.com wrote: Hi Prashant, so the only downside is that it will take some time until CS created all SystemVMs after a host crash? Will CS create SystemVMs one by one? Mit freundlichen Grüßen / With kind regards, Swen Brüseke -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: Prashant Kumar Mishra [mailto:prashantkumar.mis...@citrix.com] Gesendet: Donnerstag, 28. Mai 2015 14:12 An: users@cloudstack.apache.org Betreff: Re: AW: system VMs on local storage Yes , if your zone is in enabled state and system vm went down , CS will try to bring them up on shared/local storage depend on current system.vm.use.local.storage settings . On 5/28/15, 5:19 PM, S. Brüseke - proIO GmbH s.brues...@proio.com wrote: Hi Glenn, will CS create the SystemVMs after a XenServer failure automatically? We do not want to use shared storage at all. Mit freundlichen Grüßen / With kind regards, Swen Brüseke -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: Glenn Wagner [mailto:glenn.wag...@shapeblue.com] Gesendet: Donnerstag, 28. Mai 2015 11:13 An: users@cloudstack.apache.org; S. Brüseke - proIO GmbH Betreff: RE: system VMs on local storage Hi, I honestly would not put the System VM's on local Storage on a Production environment, if you have a Xenserver failure the System VM's will go down, You will need to recreate them causing downtime. Glenn Wagner Senior Consultant, South Africa Phone: +27 21 527 0091 | Mobile: +27 73 917 4111 glenn.wag...@shapeblue.com | www.shapeblue.com | Twitter:@shapeBlue ShapeBlue SA (Pty) Ltd, 2nd Floor, Oudehuis Centre, 122 Main Rd, Somerset West, Cape Town 7130 -Original Message- From: S. Brüseke - proIO GmbH [mailto:s.brues...@proio.com] Sent: 28 May 2015 10:58 AM To: users@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: system VMs on local storage Hi, we are thinking about to use only local storage in our CS installation. We are using XenServer 6.2 SP1 as hypervisor. What about System VMs? Is it okay to change system.vm.use.local.storage to true and then migrate all System VMs and Router VMs to local storage? Is it wise to put System VMs on local storage? Thank for sharing your experience! Mit freundlichen Grüßen / With kind regards, Swen Brüseke - proIO GmbH - Geschäftsführer: Swen Brüseke Sitz der Gesellschaft: Frankfurt am Main USt-IdNr. DE 267 075 918 Registergericht: Frankfurt am Main - HRB 86239 Diese E-Mail enthält vertrauliche und/oder rechtlich geschützte Informationen. Wenn Sie nicht der richtige Adressat sind oder diese E-Mail irrtümlich erhalten haben, informieren Sie bitte sofort den Absender und vernichten Sie diese Mail. Das unerlaubte Kopieren sowie die unbefugte Weitergabe dieser Mail sind nicht gestattet. This e-mail may contain confidential and/or privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient (or have received this e-mail in error) please notify the sender immediately and destroy this e-mail. Any unauthorized copying, disclosure or distribution of the material in this e-mail is strictly forbidden. Find out more about ShapeBlue and our range of CloudStack related services IaaS Cloud Design Buildhttp://secure-web.cisco.com/1dYmNXcpqRQ4xMQy8yCKTrGSQaWN6hV3Cuo Ig 11a tTedR7-uxNmPD5eRyhs9cqh-RJ__Q9a5GlyOpZv6fZdddcg0OzTeAwpLrvQxK3BIQGTee sv IvS r6VYLK_-KkXUlV6J6lRwaLZDlCKv8EvEQgDo2tz7k-MM84I94oI3Vj1Gb24JeHSV6g38n wp ANW JekyS/http%3A%2F%2Fshapeblue.com%2Fiaas-cloud-design-and-build%2F%2F CSForge rapid IaaS deployment frameworkhttp://secure-web.cisco.com/1c3DThpdAoMLpcII1DUg4mb77LEBA8F 47 u6r _3GRCRkgV7i8PzG1Y5Y0XmXhnvTaXXy-lPJKaS0bZGnLc40yXglmoSo5ETEKKOW0Zr45Z FT Xao QtOF6JrMMKIF-EzLy4LLsb0my3uHt6xrUlvPspMsY47e-7AZO1uxdrRrM5vYNpmrj3JHk Ds n1k 0beubo5Mp/http%3A%2F%2Fshapeblue.com%2Fcsforge%2F CloudStack Consultinghttp://secure-web.cisco.com/1_IL8Rn9bKuPzhdLeJKPw2Ej4Kr2BC Du YMl U7I1pHQCnxmKmrAuRwp6qoIHRQdQc0Vu7Ql1RGVb1BkO8dyTricX8p7w-wN9nuDcecE-F gE Xte 7pF9ddfZV_BRO4y2RkbMp8fe05TFRNmzoNQITeQZ2ztjU-5EgAk20qetQZeqxfE3Kqrt4 Hd C2a kdrUI6Ph4E/http%3A%2F%2Fshapeblue.com%2Fcloudstack-consultancy%2F CloudStack Software Engineeringhttp://secure-web.cisco.com/138uz6eUEWimRjLZUGUdElT3G29pR sq BVF
Re: enable local storage
I think they will not appear as a device in CS UI. On Thu, May 28, 2015 at 10:33 AM, S. Brüseke - proIO GmbH s.brues...@proio.com wrote: Hi, I installed new disks in some of our XenServer hosts and added the raid to the XenServer-host. Now I need to add this new storage to CS. I enabled local storage for the zone, but I am still unable to see the new local storage as primary storage. Is there some kind of cron which needs to run before I see this storage on infrastructure tab in CS UI? Does the local storage needs to use a specific name or can I use a random name as name-label inside XenServer? Mit freundlichen Grüßen / With kind regards, Swen Brüseke - proIO GmbH - Geschäftsführer: Swen Brüseke Sitz der Gesellschaft: Frankfurt am Main USt-IdNr. DE 267 075 918 Registergericht: Frankfurt am Main - HRB 86239 Diese E-Mail enthält vertrauliche und/oder rechtlich geschützte Informationen. Wenn Sie nicht der richtige Adressat sind oder diese E-Mail irrtümlich erhalten haben, informieren Sie bitte sofort den Absender und vernichten Sie diese Mail. Das unerlaubte Kopieren sowie die unbefugte Weitergabe dieser Mail sind nicht gestattet. This e-mail may contain confidential and/or privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient (or have received this e-mail in error) please notify the sender immediately and destroy this e-mail. Any unauthorized copying, disclosure or distribution of the material in this e-mail is strictly forbidden. -- Rafael Weingärtner
Re: AW: system VMs on local storage
Why not :) just dont modify global variable to create system VMs on local, and create appropraite compute offerings with Local storage type (and disk offerings Local storage type) SSVM/CPVM afaik, dont do any heavy writing. Export another NFS path for shared Primary Storage... On 28 May 2015 at 15:05, S. Brüseke - proIO GmbH s.brues...@proio.com wrote: thank you! So it would make sense to keep a nfs shared storage only for SystemVMs? Can we use our secondary storage for this? Mit freundlichen Grüßen / With kind regards, Swen Brüseke proIO GmbH Kleyerstr. 79 - 89 / Tor 13 D-60326 Frankfurt am Main Mail: s.brues...@proio.com Tel: +(49) (0) 69 739049-15 Fax: +(49) (0) 69 739049-25 Web: www.proio.com - Support - Mail: supp...@proio.com 24h: +(49) (0) 1805 522 855 -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: Prashant Kumar Mishra [mailto:prashantkumar.mis...@citrix.com] Gesendet: Donnerstag, 28. Mai 2015 14:59 An: users@cloudstack.apache.org Betreff: Re: AW: system VMs on local storage 1-To recreate router vm you need to stop-start any existing vm or deploy a new vm . 2-In case if you are changing storage(shared to local or local to share) you need to destroy existing router vm and follow step 1. On 5/28/15, 6:12 PM, S. Brüseke - proIO GmbH s.brues...@proio.com wrote: How do you recreate VRs? Mit freundlichen Grüßen / With kind regards, Swen Brüseke -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: Koushik Das [mailto:koushik@citrix.com] Gesendet: Donnerstag, 28. Mai 2015 14:30 An: users@cloudstack.apache.org Betreff: Re: system VMs on local storage SSVM and CPVM will be started simultaneously. But virtual routers won't get created automatically. On 28-May-2015, at 5:51 PM, S. Brüseke - proIO GmbH s.brues...@proio.com wrote: Hi Prashant, so the only downside is that it will take some time until CS created all SystemVMs after a host crash? Will CS create SystemVMs one by one? Mit freundlichen Grüßen / With kind regards, Swen Brüseke -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: Prashant Kumar Mishra [mailto:prashantkumar.mis...@citrix.com] Gesendet: Donnerstag, 28. Mai 2015 14:12 An: users@cloudstack.apache.org Betreff: Re: AW: system VMs on local storage Yes , if your zone is in enabled state and system vm went down , CS will try to bring them up on shared/local storage depend on current system.vm.use.local.storage settings . On 5/28/15, 5:19 PM, S. Brüseke - proIO GmbH s.brues...@proio.com wrote: Hi Glenn, will CS create the SystemVMs after a XenServer failure automatically? We do not want to use shared storage at all. Mit freundlichen Grüßen / With kind regards, Swen Brüseke -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: Glenn Wagner [mailto:glenn.wag...@shapeblue.com] Gesendet: Donnerstag, 28. Mai 2015 11:13 An: users@cloudstack.apache.org; S. Brüseke - proIO GmbH Betreff: RE: system VMs on local storage Hi, I honestly would not put the System VM's on local Storage on a Production environment, if you have a Xenserver failure the System VM's will go down, You will need to recreate them causing downtime. Glenn Wagner Senior Consultant, South Africa Phone: +27 21 527 0091 | Mobile: +27 73 917 4111 glenn.wag...@shapeblue.com | www.shapeblue.com | Twitter:@shapeBlue ShapeBlue SA (Pty) Ltd, 2nd Floor, Oudehuis Centre, 122 Main Rd, Somerset West, Cape Town 7130 -Original Message- From: S. Brüseke - proIO GmbH [mailto:s.brues...@proio.com] Sent: 28 May 2015 10:58 AM To: users@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: system VMs on local storage Hi, we are thinking about to use only local storage in our CS installation. We are using XenServer 6.2 SP1 as hypervisor. What about System VMs? Is it okay to change system.vm.use.local.storage to true and then migrate all System VMs and Router VMs to local storage? Is it wise to put System VMs on local storage? Thank for sharing your experience! Mit freundlichen Grüßen / With kind regards, Swen Brüseke - proIO GmbH - Geschäftsführer: Swen Brüseke Sitz der Gesellschaft: Frankfurt am Main USt-IdNr. DE 267 075 918 Registergericht: Frankfurt am Main - HRB 86239 Diese E-Mail enthält vertrauliche und/oder rechtlich geschützte Informationen. Wenn Sie nicht der richtige Adressat sind oder diese E-Mail irrtümlich erhalten haben, informieren Sie bitte sofort den Absender und vernichten Sie diese Mail. Das unerlaubte Kopieren sowie die unbefugte Weitergabe dieser Mail sind nicht gestattet. This e-mail may contain confidential and/or privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient (or have received this e-mail in error) please notify the sender immediately and destroy this e-mail. Any unauthorized copying, disclosure or distribution of the material in this e-mail is strictly forbidden. Find out more about ShapeBlue and our
enable local storage
Hi, I installed new disks in some of our XenServer hosts and added the raid to the XenServer-host. Now I need to add this new storage to CS. I enabled local storage for the zone, but I am still unable to see the new local storage as primary storage. Is there some kind of cron which needs to run before I see this storage on infrastructure tab in CS UI? Does the local storage needs to use a specific name or can I use a random name as name-label inside XenServer? Mit freundlichen Grüßen / With kind regards, Swen Brüseke - proIO GmbH - Geschäftsführer: Swen Brüseke Sitz der Gesellschaft: Frankfurt am Main USt-IdNr. DE 267 075 918 Registergericht: Frankfurt am Main - HRB 86239 Diese E-Mail enthält vertrauliche und/oder rechtlich geschützte Informationen. Wenn Sie nicht der richtige Adressat sind oder diese E-Mail irrtümlich erhalten haben, informieren Sie bitte sofort den Absender und vernichten Sie diese Mail. Das unerlaubte Kopieren sowie die unbefugte Weitergabe dieser Mail sind nicht gestattet. This e-mail may contain confidential and/or privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient (or have received this e-mail in error) please notify the sender immediately and destroy this e-mail. Any unauthorized copying, disclosure or distribution of the material in this e-mail is strictly forbidden.
Re: enable local storage
Do a host reconnect or management server restart. They will automatically be show under primary storage. On Thu, May 28, 2015 at 19:03 PM, S. Brüseke - proIO GmbH s.brues...@proio.com wrote: Hi, I installed new disks in some of our XenServer hosts and added the raid to the XenServer-host. Now I need to add this new storage to CS. I enabled local storage for the zone, but I am still unable to see the new local storage as primary storage. Is there some kind of cron which needs to run before I see this storage on infrastructure tab in CS UI? Does the local storage needs to use a specific name or can I use a random name as name-label inside XenServer? Mit freundlichen Grüßen / With kind regards, Swen Brüseke - proIO GmbH - Geschäftsführer: Swen Brüseke Sitz der Gesellschaft: Frankfurt am Main USt-IdNr. DE 267 075 918 Registergericht: Frankfurt am Main - HRB 86239 Diese E-Mail enthält vertrauliche und/oder rechtlich geschützte Informationen. Wenn Sie nicht der richtige Adressat sind oder diese E-Mail irrtümlich erhalten haben, informieren Sie bitte sofort den Absender und vernichten Sie diese Mail. Das unerlaubte Kopieren sowie die unbefugte Weitergabe dieser Mail sind nicht gestattet. This e-mail may contain confidential and/or privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient (or have received this e-mail in error) please notify the sender immediately and destroy this e-mail. Any unauthorized copying, disclosure or distribution of the material in this e-mail is strictly forbidden. -- - Sent from Windows Phone ~Rajani
AW: enable local storage
Is it possible to attach only specific local storage to CS? We using raid1 for XenServer installation and during installation xs created local storage of the rest of this raid1. We installed a new raid5 with ssd and named it localSSD. This is the local storage with I want CS installing instances on. Mit freundlichen Grüßen / With kind regards, Swen Brüseke -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: Koushik Das [mailto:koushik@citrix.com] Gesendet: Donnerstag, 28. Mai 2015 15:57 An: users@cloudstack.apache.org Betreff: Re: enable local storage After enabling local storage for zone, MS restart is required for local storage to be discovered for already added hosts. For new hosts it gets added at the time of adding host. On 28-May-2015, at 7:03 PM, S. Brüseke - proIO GmbH s.brues...@proio.com wrote: Hi, I installed new disks in some of our XenServer hosts and added the raid to the XenServer-host. Now I need to add this new storage to CS. I enabled local storage for the zone, but I am still unable to see the new local storage as primary storage. Is there some kind of cron which needs to run before I see this storage on infrastructure tab in CS UI? Does the local storage needs to use a specific name or can I use a random name as name-label inside XenServer? Mit freundlichen Grüßen / With kind regards, Swen Brüseke - proIO GmbH - Geschäftsführer: Swen Brüseke Sitz der Gesellschaft: Frankfurt am Main USt-IdNr. DE 267 075 918 Registergericht: Frankfurt am Main - HRB 86239 Diese E-Mail enthält vertrauliche und/oder rechtlich geschützte Informationen. Wenn Sie nicht der richtige Adressat sind oder diese E-Mail irrtümlich erhalten haben, informieren Sie bitte sofort den Absender und vernichten Sie diese Mail. Das unerlaubte Kopieren sowie die unbefugte Weitergabe dieser Mail sind nicht gestattet. This e-mail may contain confidential and/or privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient (or have received this e-mail in error) please notify the sender immediately and destroy this e-mail. Any unauthorized copying, disclosure or distribution of the material in this e-mail is strictly forbidden. - proIO GmbH - Geschäftsführer: Swen Brüseke Sitz der Gesellschaft: Frankfurt am Main USt-IdNr. DE 267 075 918 Registergericht: Frankfurt am Main - HRB 86239 Diese E-Mail enthält vertrauliche und/oder rechtlich geschützte Informationen. Wenn Sie nicht der richtige Adressat sind oder diese E-Mail irrtümlich erhalten haben, informieren Sie bitte sofort den Absender und vernichten Sie diese Mail. Das unerlaubte Kopieren sowie die unbefugte Weitergabe dieser Mail sind nicht gestattet. This e-mail may contain confidential and/or privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient (or have received this e-mail in error) please notify the sender immediately and destroy this e-mail. Any unauthorized copying, disclosure or distribution of the material in this e-mail is strictly forbidden.
