Deleting Compute Offering

2015-08-13 Thread S . Brüseke - proIO GmbH
Hi,

I need to delete a Compute Offering because it is using a storage tag of a 
primary storage which we want to get rid of in the future and I do not want 
users to still be able to deploy new VMs on this primary storage. Of course it 
is easy to delete the offering, but what will happen with existing VMs using 
this offering?
Will I be still able to use live migration and start/stop them?
We re using CS 4.3

Mit freundlichen Grüßen / With kind regards,

Swen Brüseke



- proIO GmbH -
Geschäftsführer: Swen Brüseke
Sitz der Gesellschaft: Frankfurt am Main

USt-IdNr. DE 267 075 918
Registergericht: Frankfurt am Main - HRB 86239

Diese E-Mail enthält vertrauliche und/oder rechtlich geschützte Informationen. 
Wenn Sie nicht der richtige Adressat sind oder diese E-Mail irrtümlich erhalten 
haben, 
informieren Sie bitte sofort den Absender und vernichten Sie diese Mail. 
Das unerlaubte Kopieren sowie die unbefugte Weitergabe dieser Mail sind nicht 
gestattet. 

This e-mail may contain confidential and/or privileged information. 
If you are not the intended recipient (or have received this e-mail in error) 
please notify 
the sender immediately and destroy this e-mail.  
Any unauthorized copying, disclosure or distribution of the material in this 
e-mail is strictly forbidden. 




RE: Register iso so slow.

2015-08-13 Thread Vadim Kimlaychuk
Use route -n to see what your default gateway is. If you have wrong GW - you 
will not be able to reach anything outside network. It should not be always 
x.x.x.1, but usually is.

Vadim.

-Original Message-
From: Borhan Asgharnejad [mailto:b.asgharne...@gmail.com] 
Sent: Wednesday, August 12, 2015 8:57 PM
To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: Register iso so slow.

my gateway is 192.168.76.2, could the problem cause the Gateway? i read in 
quick installation need /24 network with gateway XXX.XXX.XXX.1.
i install centos 6.6 on vmware workstation. and setup cloud stack on it.

On Wed, Aug 12, 2015 at 10:23 PM, Borhan Asgharnejad  b.asgharne...@gmail.com 
wrote:

 hi Sam
 yes i did it. but still the problem exist.

 On Wed, Aug 12, 2015 at 10:15 PM, Sam Ceylani 
 s...@mistercertified.com
 wrote:

 Borhan, did you try running your server at port 8080? there are some 
 hard coded stuff for this port in the code and secstorage allowed 
 sites etc. I asked this yesterday but couldnt get an answer from you 
 :)

 Sent from my iPhone

  On Aug 12, 2015, at 1:02 PM, Borhan Asgharnejad 
 b.asgharne...@gmail.com wrote:
 
  sorry set secstorage.allowed.internal.sites to 192.168.76.0/24 
  http://192.168.76.9/24
 
  On Wed, Aug 12, 2015 at 9:07 PM, Borhan Asgharnejad 
 b.asgharne...@gmail.com
  wrote:
 
  hi
  this is ssvm check result and of course i set 
  secstorage.allowed.internal.sites to 192.168.76.9/24. but after
 register
  iso it just create empty file in 192.168.76.5:/secondary (i mean 
  the
 size
  of file 0kb)
 
 
  First DNS server is  8.8.8.8
  PING 8.8.8.8 (8.8.8.8): 48 data bytes
  56 bytes from 8.8.8.8: icmp_seq=0 ttl=128 time=670.263 ms
  56 bytes from 8.8.8.8: icmp_seq=1 ttl=128 time=749.591 ms
  --- 8.8.8.8 ping statistics ---
  2 packets transmitted, 2 packets received, 0% packet loss 
  round-trip min/avg/max/stddev = 670.263/709.927/749.591/39.664 ms
  Good: Can ping DNS server
  
  Good: DNS resolves download.cloud.com 
  
  nfs is currently mounted
  Mount point is 
  /mnt/SecStorage/74b7fe22-5937-3f2a-b2a2-8f9dbdc54631
  Good: Can write to mount point
  
  Management server is 192.168.76.5. Checking connectivity.
  Good: Can connect to management server port 8250 
  
  Good: Java process is running
  
  Tests Complete. Look for ERROR or WARNING above.
 
  On Wed, Aug 12, 2015 at 7:32 PM, Somesh Naidu 
  somesh.na...@citrix.com
 
  wrote:
 
  Hi Borhan,
 
  i figure out when i try get iso
  file on SSVM by wget command (wget 
  http://192.168.76.5/isoname.iso) http://10.39.1.9/isoname.iso 
  say cannot write to 'isoname http://10.39.1.9/isoname.iso.iso' (No 
  space left on device).
 
  This probably won't work if you were using SSVM's root disk as a
 target
  for download as it size is limited to 2 GB.
 
  I believe this is internal IP 192.168.76.5, if that's true, 
  have you added this IP to the global config
 secstorage.allowed.internal.sites?
 
  Also, as Prashant and Sam recommended, validate all is fine with 
  SSVM
 by
  performing troubleshooting as mentioned on the wiki.
 
  Regards,
  Somesh
 
 
  -Original Message-
  From: Sam Ceylani [mailto:s...@mistercertified.com]
  Sent: Wednesday, August 12, 2015 2:58 AM
  To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
  Subject: RE: Register iso so slow.
 
  It only accepts it on port 8080 don’t ask me why, in theory yes 
  port
 80
  is ok and yes you can but I never get it to work, try running 
  your web server on port 8080 and give it a try :)
 
  -Original Message-
  From: Vadim Kimlaychuk [mailto:vadim.kimlayc...@elion.ee]
  Sent: Wednesday, August 12, 2015 2:55 AM
  To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
  Subject: RE: Register iso so slow.
 
  Hi, Borhan
 
 Is your SSVM up and agent status is connected?  Can you
 confirm
  that troubleshooting SSVM (
 
 https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/SSVM,+template
 s,+Secondary+storage+troubleshooting
 )
  gives OK status?
 
  Regards,
 
  Vadim.
 
 
  -Original Message-
  From: Borhan Asgharnejad [mailto:b.asgharne...@gmail.com]
  Sent: Wednesday, August 12, 2015 9:44 AM
  To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
  Subject: Re: Register iso so slow.
 
  Hi Vadiam
  The SSVM and CPVM is running and up.
  The status of registering iso is null, and i figure out when i 
  try get iso file on SSVM by wget command (wget
 http://192.168.76.5/isoname.iso) 
  http://10.39.1.9/isoname.iso say cannot write to 'isoname  
  http://10.39.1.9/isoname.iso.iso' (No space left on device). i 
  have problem to register iso could you please tell me what can i 
  do. by
 the way
  i have about 400 GB free space on secondary storage.
 
  On Wed, Aug 12, 2015 at 9:45 AM, Vadim Kimlaychuk  
  vadim.kimlayc...@elion.ee
  wrote:
 
  Hello Borhan,
 

Re: Register iso so slow.

2015-08-13 Thread Borhan Asgharnejad
Hi
My Problem already exist.
As I check ssvm troubleshooting i notice something about systemVM.ISO What
is it and how check if  it is patch correct in my cloudstack.
i see it in my management server and it has 54.6 MB size
/usr/share/cloudstack-common/vms/systemvm.iso.

On Thu, Aug 13, 2015 at 12:40 AM, Borhan Asgharnejad 
b.asgharne...@gmail.com wrote:

 not working at all.

 On Wed, Aug 12, 2015 at 11:44 PM, Sam Ceylani s...@mistercertified.com
 wrote:

 First you need to tell me if it is slow or not working at all? Both
 requires different troubleshooting...

 -Original Message-
 From: Borhan Asgharnejad [mailto:b.asgharne...@gmail.com]
 Sent: Wednesday, August 12, 2015 1:57 PM
 To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
 Subject: Re: Register iso so slow.

 my gateway is 192.168.76.2, could the problem cause the Gateway? i read
 in quick installation need /24 network with gateway XXX.XXX.XXX.1.
 i install centos 6.6 on vmware workstation. and setup cloud stack on it.

 On Wed, Aug 12, 2015 at 10:23 PM, Borhan Asgharnejad 
 b.asgharne...@gmail.com wrote:

  hi Sam
  yes i did it. but still the problem exist.
 
  On Wed, Aug 12, 2015 at 10:15 PM, Sam Ceylani
  s...@mistercertified.com
  wrote:
 
  Borhan, did you try running your server at port 8080? there are some
  hard coded stuff for this port in the code and secstorage allowed
  sites etc. I asked this yesterday but couldnt get an answer from you
  :)
 
  Sent from my iPhone
 
   On Aug 12, 2015, at 1:02 PM, Borhan Asgharnejad 
  b.asgharne...@gmail.com wrote:
  
   sorry set secstorage.allowed.internal.sites to 192.168.76.0/24
   http://192.168.76.9/24
  
   On Wed, Aug 12, 2015 at 9:07 PM, Borhan Asgharnejad 
  b.asgharne...@gmail.com
   wrote:
  
   hi
   this is ssvm check result and of course i set
   secstorage.allowed.internal.sites to 192.168.76.9/24. but after
  register
   iso it just create empty file in 192.168.76.5:/secondary (i mean
   the
  size
   of file 0kb)
  
  
   First DNS server is  8.8.8.8
   PING 8.8.8.8 (8.8.8.8): 48 data bytes
   56 bytes from 8.8.8.8: icmp_seq=0 ttl=128 time=670.263 ms
   56 bytes from 8.8.8.8: icmp_seq=1 ttl=128 time=749.591 ms
   --- 8.8.8.8 ping statistics ---
   2 packets transmitted, 2 packets received, 0% packet loss
   round-trip min/avg/max/stddev = 670.263/709.927/749.591/39.664 ms
   Good: Can ping DNS server
   
   Good: DNS resolves download.cloud.com
   
   nfs is currently mounted
   Mount point is
   /mnt/SecStorage/74b7fe22-5937-3f2a-b2a2-8f9dbdc54631
   Good: Can write to mount point
   
   Management server is 192.168.76.5. Checking connectivity.
   Good: Can connect to management server port 8250
   
   Good: Java process is running
   
   Tests Complete. Look for ERROR or WARNING above.
  
   On Wed, Aug 12, 2015 at 7:32 PM, Somesh Naidu
   somesh.na...@citrix.com
  
   wrote:
  
   Hi Borhan,
  
   i figure out when i try get iso
   file on SSVM by wget command (wget
   http://192.168.76.5/isoname.iso) http://10.39.1.9/isoname.iso
   say cannot write to 'isoname http://10.39.1.9/isoname.iso.iso'
 (No space left on device).
  
   This probably won't work if you were using SSVM's root disk as a
  target
   for download as it size is limited to 2 GB.
  
   I believe this is internal IP 192.168.76.5, if that's true,
   have you added this IP to the global config
  secstorage.allowed.internal.sites?
  
   Also, as Prashant and Sam recommended, validate all is fine with
   SSVM
  by
   performing troubleshooting as mentioned on the wiki.
  
   Regards,
   Somesh
  
  
   -Original Message-
   From: Sam Ceylani [mailto:s...@mistercertified.com]
   Sent: Wednesday, August 12, 2015 2:58 AM
   To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
   Subject: RE: Register iso so slow.
  
   It only accepts it on port 8080 don’t ask me why, in theory yes
   port
  80
   is ok and yes you can but I never get it to work, try running
   your web server on port 8080 and give it a try :)
  
   -Original Message-
   From: Vadim Kimlaychuk [mailto:vadim.kimlayc...@elion.ee]
   Sent: Wednesday, August 12, 2015 2:55 AM
   To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
   Subject: RE: Register iso so slow.
  
   Hi, Borhan
  
  Is your SSVM up and agent status is connected?  Can you
  confirm
   that troubleshooting SSVM (
  
  https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/SSVM,+template
  s,+Secondary+storage+troubleshooting
  )
   gives OK status?
  
   Regards,
  
   Vadim.
  
  
   -Original Message-
   From: Borhan Asgharnejad [mailto:b.asgharne...@gmail.com]
   Sent: Wednesday, August 12, 2015 9:44 AM
   To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
   Subject: Re: Register iso so slow.
  
   Hi Vadiam
   The SSVM and CPVM is running and up.
   The status of registering iso is 

RE: Deleting Compute Offering

2015-08-13 Thread Vadim Kimlaychuk
Hello Swen,

If I am not mistaken - you can't delete offering if it is used. You 
will get an error. First -- you must assign new offering and then remove the 
old one

Vadim.

-Original Message-
From: S. Brüseke - proIO GmbH [mailto:s.brues...@proio.com] 
Sent: Thursday, August 13, 2015 1:29 PM
To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Deleting Compute Offering

Hi,

I need to delete a Compute Offering because it is using a storage tag of a 
primary storage which we want to get rid of in the future and I do not want 
users to still be able to deploy new VMs on this primary storage. Of course it 
is easy to delete the offering, but what will happen with existing VMs using 
this offering?
Will I be still able to use live migration and start/stop them?
We re using CS 4.3

Mit freundlichen Grüßen / With kind regards,

Swen Brüseke



- proIO GmbH -
Geschäftsführer: Swen Brüseke
Sitz der Gesellschaft: Frankfurt am Main

USt-IdNr. DE 267 075 918
Registergericht: Frankfurt am Main - HRB 86239

Diese E-Mail enthält vertrauliche und/oder rechtlich geschützte Informationen. 
Wenn Sie nicht der richtige Adressat sind oder diese E-Mail irrtümlich erhalten 
haben, informieren Sie bitte sofort den Absender und vernichten Sie diese Mail. 
Das unerlaubte Kopieren sowie die unbefugte Weitergabe dieser Mail sind nicht 
gestattet. 

This e-mail may contain confidential and/or privileged information. 
If you are not the intended recipient (or have received this e-mail in error) 
please notify the sender immediately and destroy this e-mail.  
Any unauthorized copying, disclosure or distribution of the material in this 
e-mail is strictly forbidden. 




[PROMOTE] CloudStack Silicon Valley User Group Meetup - September 10th, 2015

2015-08-13 Thread Karen Vuong
Hi all,



If you’re going to be in the Silicon Valley on September 10th - then join
us! The next CloudStack Silicon Valley Meetup has been scheduled for
Thursday, September 10th at Nuage Networks in Mountain View, CA. We have a
packed agenda with talks around CloudStack, SDN, NFV and Virtualization.



Date: Thursday, September 10th

Time: 6:00pm – 9:00pm

Address:  Nuage Networks, 755 Ravendale Dr., Mountain View, CA

Event link:
http://www.meetup.com/CloudStack-Silicon-Valley-User-Group/events/224611294/



Help Promote:



Click-to-tweet: http://ctt.ec/UN6Yb - RSVP now for the #CloudStack Silicon
Valley meetup on Sept 10! #NFV #SDN #Virtualization #Cloud all in one
meetup - clds.co/1gDYDmT



Click-to-tweet: http://ctt.ec/5ytK8 - Join the #CloudStack Silicon Valley
meetup on Sept 10! Thanks to @nuagenetworks for sponsoring - clds.co/1gDYDmT
#NFV #SDN #Cloud



Thanks,



Karen


RE: CloudStack安装后,系统vm无法启动

2015-08-13 Thread 孟纪超
HI Tony我觉得你可以按照如下思路去检查:1. 在仪表盘查看二级存储有无容量显示2. 手动在虚拟化主机mount 
nfs的路径,看能否mount,并检查是否可以写入3. 在虚拟化节点上查看有无自动挂载主存储,并检查主存储是否可以写入
希望能够帮到你,谢谢!

Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2015 10:53:36 +0800
From: xutao3...@sina.com
To: users-cn@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: CloudStack安装后,系统vm无法启动

如题:安装之后,系统vm无法启动,请各位大神帮忙看看



tail -100f /var/log/cloudstack/management/management-server.log
2015-08-12 10:46:04,414 ERROR [c.c.v.VmWorkJobDispatcher] 
(Work-Job-Executor-89:ctx-8e8e74c8 job-1/job-265) Unable to complete AsyncJobVO 
{id:265, userId: 1, accountId: 1, instanceType: null, instanceId: null, cmd: 
com.cloud.vm.VmWorkStart, cmdInfo: 
rO0ABXNyABhjb20uY2xvdWQudm0uVm1Xb3JrU3RhcnR9cMGsvxz73gIAC0oABGRjSWRMAAZhdm9pZHN0ADBMY29tL2Nsb3VkL2RlcGxveS9EZXBsb3ltZW50UGxhbm5lciRFeGNsdWRlTGlzdDtMAAljbHVzdGVySWR0ABBMamF2YS9sYW5nL0xvbmc7TAAGaG9zdElkcQB-AAJMAAtqb3VybmFsTmFtZXQAEkxqYXZhL2xhbmcvU3RyaW5nO0wAEXBoeXNpY2FsTmV0d29ya0lkcQB-AAJMAAdwbGFubmVycQB-AANMAAVwb2RJZHEAfgACTAAGcG9vbElkcQB-AAJMAAlyYXdQYXJhbXN0AA9MamF2YS91dGlsL01hcDtMAA1yZXNlcnZhdGlvbklkcQB-AAN4cgATY29tLmNsb3VkLnZtLlZtV29ya5-ZtlbwJWdrAgAESgAJYWNjb3VudElkSgAGdXNlcklkSgAEdm1JZEwAC2hhbmRsZXJOYW1lcQB-AAN4cAABAAEANHQAGVZpcnR1YWxNYWNoaW5lTWFuYWdlckltcGwAAHBwcHBwcHBwcHA,
 cmdVersion: 0, status: IN_PROGRESS, processStatus: 0, resultCode: 0, result: 
null, initMsid: 75489454944000, completeMsid: null, lastUpdated: null, 
lastPolled: null, created: Wed Aug 12 10:45:59 CST 2015}, job origin:1
com.cloud.exception.InsufficientServerCapacityException: Unable to create a 
deployment for VM[SecondaryStorageVm|s-52-VM]Scope=interface 
com.cloud.dc.DataCenter; id=1
at 
com.cloud.vm.VirtualMachineManagerImpl.orchestrateStart(VirtualMachineManagerImpl.java:947)
at 
com.cloud.vm.VirtualMachineManagerImpl.orchestrateStart(VirtualMachineManagerImpl.java:4480)
at sun.reflect.GeneratedMethodAccessor254.invoke(Unknown Source)
at 
sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43)
at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:606)
at 
com.cloud.vm.VmWorkJobHandlerProxy.handleVmWorkJob(VmWorkJobHandlerProxy.java:107)
at 
com.cloud.vm.VirtualMachineManagerImpl.handleVmWorkJob(VirtualMachineManagerImpl.java:4636)
at com.cloud.vm.VmWorkJobDispatcher.runJob(VmWorkJobDispatcher.java:103)
at 
org.apache.cloudstack.framework.jobs.impl.AsyncJobManagerImpl$5.runInContext(AsyncJobManagerImpl.java:537)
at 
org.apache.cloudstack.managed.context.ManagedContextRunnable$1.run(ManagedContextRunnable.java:49)
at 
org.apache.cloudstack.managed.context.impl.DefaultManagedContext$1.call(DefaultManagedContext.java:56)
at 
org.apache.cloudstack.managed.context.impl.DefaultManagedContext.callWithContext(DefaultManagedContext.java:103)
at 
org.apache.cloudstack.managed.context.impl.DefaultManagedContext.runWithContext(DefaultManagedContext.java:53)
at 
org.apache.cloudstack.managed.context.ManagedContextRunnable.run(ManagedContextRunnable.java:46)
at 
org.apache.cloudstack.framework.jobs.impl.AsyncJobManagerImpl$5.run(AsyncJobManagerImpl.java:494)
at 
java.util.concurrent.Executors$RunnableAdapter.call(Executors.java:471)
at java.util.concurrent.FutureTask.run(FutureTask.java:262)
at 
java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1145)
at 
java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:615)
at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:744)
2015-08-12 10:46:04,416 DEBUG [o.a.c.f.j.i.AsyncJobManagerImpl] 
(Work-Job-Executor-89:ctx-8e8e74c8 job-1/job-265) Complete async job-265, 
jobStatus: FAILED, resultCode: 0, result: 

RE: Register iso so slow.

2015-08-13 Thread Somesh Naidu
@Sam,

About running the webserver on port 80, we have this running in multiple 
environments when using internal sites and it seems to work fine.

@Borhan,
1. have you ever been able to register a template/ISO in this environment?
2. what hypervisor is being used? Xenserver?
3. have you tried to recreate SSVM to see if that helps?
4. were you able to spot any errors in either management or agent (SSVM) logs 
related to this operation?
5. look for this template in template_store_ref, what state is it in?

Regards,
Somesh


-Original Message-
From: Borhan Asgharnejad [mailto:b.asgharne...@gmail.com] 
Sent: Thursday, August 13, 2015 4:55 AM
To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: Register iso so slow.

Hi
My Problem already exist.
As I check ssvm troubleshooting i notice something about systemVM.ISO What
is it and how check if  it is patch correct in my cloudstack.
i see it in my management server and it has 54.6 MB size
/usr/share/cloudstack-common/vms/systemvm.iso.

On Thu, Aug 13, 2015 at 12:40 AM, Borhan Asgharnejad 
b.asgharne...@gmail.com wrote:

 not working at all.

 On Wed, Aug 12, 2015 at 11:44 PM, Sam Ceylani s...@mistercertified.com
 wrote:

 First you need to tell me if it is slow or not working at all? Both
 requires different troubleshooting...

 -Original Message-
 From: Borhan Asgharnejad [mailto:b.asgharne...@gmail.com]
 Sent: Wednesday, August 12, 2015 1:57 PM
 To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
 Subject: Re: Register iso so slow.

 my gateway is 192.168.76.2, could the problem cause the Gateway? i read
 in quick installation need /24 network with gateway XXX.XXX.XXX.1.
 i install centos 6.6 on vmware workstation. and setup cloud stack on it.

 On Wed, Aug 12, 2015 at 10:23 PM, Borhan Asgharnejad 
 b.asgharne...@gmail.com wrote:

  hi Sam
  yes i did it. but still the problem exist.
 
  On Wed, Aug 12, 2015 at 10:15 PM, Sam Ceylani
  s...@mistercertified.com
  wrote:
 
  Borhan, did you try running your server at port 8080? there are some
  hard coded stuff for this port in the code and secstorage allowed
  sites etc. I asked this yesterday but couldnt get an answer from you
  :)
 
  Sent from my iPhone
 
   On Aug 12, 2015, at 1:02 PM, Borhan Asgharnejad 
  b.asgharne...@gmail.com wrote:
  
   sorry set secstorage.allowed.internal.sites to 192.168.76.0/24
   http://192.168.76.9/24
  
   On Wed, Aug 12, 2015 at 9:07 PM, Borhan Asgharnejad 
  b.asgharne...@gmail.com
   wrote:
  
   hi
   this is ssvm check result and of course i set
   secstorage.allowed.internal.sites to 192.168.76.9/24. but after
  register
   iso it just create empty file in 192.168.76.5:/secondary (i mean
   the
  size
   of file 0kb)
  
  
   First DNS server is  8.8.8.8
   PING 8.8.8.8 (8.8.8.8): 48 data bytes
   56 bytes from 8.8.8.8: icmp_seq=0 ttl=128 time=670.263 ms
   56 bytes from 8.8.8.8: icmp_seq=1 ttl=128 time=749.591 ms
   --- 8.8.8.8 ping statistics ---
   2 packets transmitted, 2 packets received, 0% packet loss
   round-trip min/avg/max/stddev = 670.263/709.927/749.591/39.664 ms
   Good: Can ping DNS server
   
   Good: DNS resolves download.cloud.com
   
   nfs is currently mounted
   Mount point is
   /mnt/SecStorage/74b7fe22-5937-3f2a-b2a2-8f9dbdc54631
   Good: Can write to mount point
   
   Management server is 192.168.76.5. Checking connectivity.
   Good: Can connect to management server port 8250
   
   Good: Java process is running
   
   Tests Complete. Look for ERROR or WARNING above.
  
   On Wed, Aug 12, 2015 at 7:32 PM, Somesh Naidu
   somesh.na...@citrix.com
  
   wrote:
  
   Hi Borhan,
  
   i figure out when i try get iso
   file on SSVM by wget command (wget
   http://192.168.76.5/isoname.iso) http://10.39.1.9/isoname.iso
   say cannot write to 'isoname http://10.39.1.9/isoname.iso.iso'
 (No space left on device).
  
   This probably won't work if you were using SSVM's root disk as a
  target
   for download as it size is limited to 2 GB.
  
   I believe this is internal IP 192.168.76.5, if that's true,
   have you added this IP to the global config
  secstorage.allowed.internal.sites?
  
   Also, as Prashant and Sam recommended, validate all is fine with
   SSVM
  by
   performing troubleshooting as mentioned on the wiki.
  
   Regards,
   Somesh
  
  
   -Original Message-
   From: Sam Ceylani [mailto:s...@mistercertified.com]
   Sent: Wednesday, August 12, 2015 2:58 AM
   To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
   Subject: RE: Register iso so slow.
  
   It only accepts it on port 8080 don’t ask me why, in theory yes
   port
  80
   is ok and yes you can but I never get it to work, try running
   your web server on port 8080 and give it a try :)
  
   -Original Message-
   From: Vadim Kimlaychuk 

Urgent Issue : Cloudstack VM HA not working

2015-08-13 Thread Fedi Ben Ali
hello ,


I'm working on cloudstack 4.4.2 and xenserver 6.2 cluster with 5 hosts, i
 deployed many virtual machines  with compute offerings having ha feature
enabled.

But when i stops one of the pools hosts , happens all VM steel set to
running on cloudstack and no ha is done.

Even when i stop a vm from the inside (setting command init 0 ) ,cloudstack
suppose to restart the VM ,but he is not doing so.

This is very weird but can any one help ,this sooo urgent .

Thx