CloudStack-UI New Release is Out - 1.0.4

[Ivan Kudryavtsev]

Hello, community.

We are happy to announce the next release of the CloudStack-UI — 1.0.5.
The release includes a lot of bug fixes and usability improvements. We have
spend two months improving the code, implementing new features and fixing
bugs found after the initial release. We missed the announces about 1.0.1 —
1.0.4 releases waiting while the most of the found bugs to be fixed. The
code was switched to Angular 4 to support the latest stack.

Links:

The release can be found at GitHub releases (
https://github.com/bwsw/cloudstack-ui/releases/tag/1.0.5)
Prepared Docker image is available at Dockerhub (
https://hub.docker.com/r/bwsw/cloudstack-ui/). You can pull it with: docker
pull bwsw/cloudstack-ui:1.0.5
The project changelog is here:
https://github.com/bwsw/cloudstack-ui/wiki/Changelog
Deployment guide and project info can be found at GitHub pages:
https://bwsw.github.io/cloudstack-ui/

Close Plans:

We are quite close for the development of our first two plugins which will
be presented at the CloudStack European User Group meetup in London, 17
aug.
The first plugin is clientless SSH console to VM, based on the code:
https://github.com/bwsw/webshell

The second plugin is charting plugin which is purposed to display
"realtime" CPU/RAM/NETIO/DISKIO stats for KVM VMs and based on the code:
https://github.com/bwsw/cs-pulse-sensor
https://github.com/bwsw/cs-pulse-server


All questions, considerations and notes are welcomed.
PS: If someone is willing to share the information about the project,
please just do it)

-- 
With best regards, Ivan Kudryavtsev
Bitworks Software, Ltd.
Cell: +7-923-414-1515
WWW: http://bitworks.software/ 

Re: KVM hypervm and HA

[Ivan Kudryavtsev]

Hi, Victor. They both will be moved automatically to a new host by ACS.

12 июл. 2017 г. 5:23 пользователь "victor"  написал:

> Hello,
>
>  I have a cloudstack system with one management server, one nfs server and
> two kvm hypervm host servers. Initially I configured cloudstack  with
> hypervm1, so the system vm  and console proxy gets created in it. Lately I
> have added hypervm2 and created few instances in it. So my doubt is the
> following.
>
> 
>
> 1, If hypervm 1 is down which contain system-vm,console-proxy and
> router-vm, then what will happen.
>
> 2, If hypervm 1 is down completely and we couldn't make it up, will the
> system vm,console proxy and router vm will be switched to hypervm2
> automatically.  If it is not automatically, then is there any option for
> that.
>
> 
>
> Regards
>
> Victor
>
>

Re: Anyone using XenServer 7 in production environment

[Pierre-Luc Dion]

The only issue I'm aware is that the xentool ISO change name in 7.1 and
CloudStack must be updated to support that new ISO file. Otherwise, look
like we just need a new set of OStype mapping and we would be good to
support XS7.1...




On Wed, May 24, 2017 at 2:21 PM, Vivek Kumar 
wrote:

> Thanks Marty
>
> On Wed, 24 May 2017 at 8:36 PM, Marty Godsey  wrote:
>
>> Vivek,
>>
>> I use XenServer 7 in production and it works great. No compatibility
>> issues and I did see performance gains. As mentioned by David though,
>> XenServer 7.1 does NOT work with ACS yet. I spun up lab to test this and it
>> did not work. I don't think this would be difficult to implement since
>> there was not too many changes from 7.0 to 7.1.
>> .
>> Regards,
>> Marty Godsey
>> Principal Engineer
>> nSource Solutions, LLC
>>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Vivek Kumar [mailto:vivek.ku...@indiqus.com]
>> Sent: Wednesday, May 24, 2017 3:23 AM
>> To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
>> Subject: Anyone using XenServer 7 in production environment
>>
>> Hello Guys,
>>
>> We are planning to go ACS  with XenServer 7 in production  so just want
>> to  know the feedback ?
>>
>> Vivek Kumar
>> Virtualization and Cloud Consultant
>>
>>
>> --
>
> *Vivek Kumar*
> Virtualization and Cloud Consultant
>
> [image: http://www.indiqus.com/images/logo.jpg]  
> *I*ndi*Q*us Technologies Pvt Ltd
> A-98, LGF, C.R.Park, New Delhi - 110019
> *O* +91 11 4055 1409 <+91%2011%204055%201409> ( 24*7 Support HelpLine )|
> *M* +91 7503460090 <+91%2075034%2060090>
> www.indiqus.com  
>

KVM hypervm and HA

[victor]

Hello,

 I have a cloudstack system with one management server, one nfs server 
and two kvm hypervm host servers. Initially I configured cloudstack  
with hypervm1, so the system vm  and console proxy gets created in it. 
Lately I have added hypervm2 and created few instances in it. So my 
doubt is the following.




1, If hypervm 1 is down which contain system-vm,console-proxy and 
router-vm, then what will happen.


2, If hypervm 1 is down completely and we couldn't make it up, will the 
system vm,console proxy and router vm will be switched to hypervm2 
automatically.  If it is not automatically, then is there any option for 
that.




Regards

Victor

Re: [DISCUSS] CloudStack 4.9.3.0 (LTS)

[Wido den Hollander]

Hi,

I would suggest: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2131

Serious issue with Ubuntu 16.04 and statistics gathering on KVM.

Wido

> Op 11 juli 2017 om 11:49 schreef Rohit Yadav :
> 
> 
> Hi Sean,
> 
> 
> Thanks for sharing.
> 
> 
> - Rohit
> 
> 
> From: Sean Lair 
> Sent: 11 July 2017 03:41:17
> To: d...@cloudstack.apache.org
> Cc: users@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: RE: [DISCUSS] CloudStack 4.9.3.0 (LTS)
> 
> Here are three issues we ran into in 4.9.2.0.  We have been running all of 
> these fixes for several months without issues.  The code changes are all very 
> easy/small, but had a big impact for us.
> 
> I'd respectfully suggest they go into 4.9.3.0:
> 
> https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2041 (VR related jobs scheduled and 
> run twice on mgmt servers)
> https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2040 (Bug in monitoring of S2S VPNs 
> - also exists in 4.10)
> https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1966 (IPSEC VPNs do not work after 
> vRouter reboot)
> 
> Thanks
> Sean
> 
> rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com 
> www.shapeblue.com
> 53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London  WC2N 4HSUK
> @shapeblue
>   
>  
> 
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: Rohit Yadav [mailto:rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com]
> Sent: Friday, July 7, 2017 1:14 AM
> To: d...@cloudstack.apache.org
> Cc: users@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: [DISCUSS] CloudStack 4.9.3.0 (LTS)
> 
> All,
> 
> 
> With 4.10.0.0 voted, I would like to start some initial discussion around the 
> next minor LTS release 4.9.3.0. At the moment I don't have a timeline, plans 
> or dates to share but I would like to engage with the community to gather 
> list of issues, commits, PRs that we should consider for the next LTS release 
> 4.9.3.0.
> 
> 
> To reduce our test and QA scope, we don't want to consider changes that are 
> new feature, or enhancements but strictly blockers/critical/major bugfixes 
> and security related fixes, and we can consider reverting any already 
> committed/merged PR(s) on 4.9 branch (committed since 4.9.2.0).
> 
> 
> Please go through list of commits since 4.9.2.0 (you can also run, git log 
> 4.9.2.0..4.9) and let us know if there is any change we should consider 
> reverting:
> 
> https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/commits/4.9
> 
> 
> I started backporting some 
> fixes on the 4.9 branch, please go through the following PR and raise 
> objections on changes/commits that we should not backport or revert:
> 
> https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2052
> 
> 
> Lastly, please also share any PRs that we should consider reviewing+merging 
> on 4.9 branch for the 4.9.3.0 release effort.
> 
> 
> - Rohit
> 
> rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com
> www.shapeblue.com
> 53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London  WC2N 4HSUK @shapeblue
> 
> 
>

Re: KVM VM Snapshots

[Rubens Malheiro]

Thank you SI
This will be incredible! and revolutionary.

Cloudstack WINS!

On Tue, Jul 11, 2017 at 11:21 AM, Simon Weller 
wrote:

> The new VM Snapshot functionality for KVM supports disk and memory snaps.
> This means you can recover a VM to a port in time, so assuming that's what
> you are asking, yes it's hot.
>
> It does rely on QCOW2 disk formats right now.
>
>
> - Si
>
>
> 
> From: Rubens Malheiro 
> Sent: Monday, July 10, 2017 7:44 PM
> To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: Re: KVM VM Snapshots
>
> Sorry to mess up
> But a version 4.10 supported snapshot in KVM will it be hot?
> On Mon, 10 Jul 2017 at 21:28 Simon Weller  wrote:
>
> > Asai,
> >
> > 4.10 was approved last week. It should hit the repos with the next few
> > days.
> >
> > - Si
> >
> > Simon Weller/615-312-6068
> >
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Asai [a...@globalchangemusic.org]
> > Received: Monday, 10 Jul 2017, 4:49PM
> > To: users@cloudstack.apache.org [users@cloudstack.apache.org]
> > Subject: Re: KVM VM Snapshots
> >
> > Rather than 9.10 I meant 4.10.  Rather than 9.2 I meant 4.9.2. Sorry.
> >
> >
> > On 7/10/2017 2:46 PM, Asai wrote:
> > > Greetings,
> > >
> > > Back in January there was a push to integrate the KVM snapshotting
> > > ability into the 9.10 trunk.  I think this did get merged in, but 9.10
> > > doesn't seem to be anywhere near release yet, so wondering if the devs
> > > can push the KVM snapshotting patch into the 9.2 trunk and release as
> > > a minor update?
> > >
> > > Asai
> > >
> >
> >
>

Re: KVM VM Snapshots

[Simon Weller]

The new VM Snapshot functionality for KVM supports disk and memory snaps. This 
means you can recover a VM to a port in time, so assuming that's what you are 
asking, yes it's hot.

It does rely on QCOW2 disk formats right now.


- Si



From: Rubens Malheiro 
Sent: Monday, July 10, 2017 7:44 PM
To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: KVM VM Snapshots

Sorry to mess up
But a version 4.10 supported snapshot in KVM will it be hot?
On Mon, 10 Jul 2017 at 21:28 Simon Weller  wrote:

> Asai,
>
> 4.10 was approved last week. It should hit the repos with the next few
> days.
>
> - Si
>
> Simon Weller/615-312-6068
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Asai [a...@globalchangemusic.org]
> Received: Monday, 10 Jul 2017, 4:49PM
> To: users@cloudstack.apache.org [users@cloudstack.apache.org]
> Subject: Re: KVM VM Snapshots
>
> Rather than 9.10 I meant 4.10.  Rather than 9.2 I meant 4.9.2. Sorry.
>
>
> On 7/10/2017 2:46 PM, Asai wrote:
> > Greetings,
> >
> > Back in January there was a push to integrate the KVM snapshotting
> > ability into the 9.10 trunk.  I think this did get merged in, but 9.10
> > doesn't seem to be anywhere near release yet, so wondering if the devs
> > can push the KVM snapshotting patch into the 9.2 trunk and release as
> > a minor update?
> >
> > Asai
> >
>
>

Re: [DISCUSS] CloudStack 4.9.3.0 (LTS)

[Rohit Yadav]

Hi Sean,


Thanks for sharing.


- Rohit


From: Sean Lair 
Sent: 11 July 2017 03:41:17
To: d...@cloudstack.apache.org
Cc: users@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: RE: [DISCUSS] CloudStack 4.9.3.0 (LTS)

Here are three issues we ran into in 4.9.2.0.  We have been running all of 
these fixes for several months without issues.  The code changes are all very 
easy/small, but had a big impact for us.

I'd respectfully suggest they go into 4.9.3.0:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2041 (VR related jobs scheduled and 
run twice on mgmt servers)
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2040 (Bug in monitoring of S2S VPNs - 
also exists in 4.10)
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1966 (IPSEC VPNs do not work after 
vRouter reboot)

Thanks
Sean

rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com 
www.shapeblue.com
53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London  WC2N 4HSUK
@shapeblue
  
 


-Original Message-
From: Rohit Yadav [mailto:rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com]
Sent: Friday, July 7, 2017 1:14 AM
To: d...@cloudstack.apache.org
Cc: users@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: [DISCUSS] CloudStack 4.9.3.0 (LTS)

All,


With 4.10.0.0 voted, I would like to start some initial discussion around the 
next minor LTS release 4.9.3.0. At the moment I don't have a timeline, plans or 
dates to share but I would like to engage with the community to gather list of 
issues, commits, PRs that we should consider for the next LTS release 4.9.3.0.


To reduce our test and QA scope, we don't want to consider changes that are new 
feature, or enhancements but strictly blockers/critical/major bugfixes and 
security related fixes, and we can consider reverting any already 
committed/merged PR(s) on 4.9 branch (committed since 4.9.2.0).


Please go through list of commits since 4.9.2.0 (you can also run, git log 
4.9.2.0..4.9) and let us know if there is any change we should consider 
reverting:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/commits/4.9


I started backporting some 
fixes on the 4.9 branch, please go through the following PR and raise 
objections on changes/commits that we should not backport or revert:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2052


Lastly, please also share any PRs that we should consider reviewing+merging on 
4.9 branch for the 4.9.3.0 release effort.


- Rohit

rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com
www.shapeblue.com
53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London  WC2N 4HSUK @shapeblue

Re: [JOB OPPORTUNITY] LeaseWeb is looking for CloudStack Developer

[Wei ZHOU]

Guys,

If you want to know more information about the position or the
company/department/team, please feel free to contact me or our recruiter.

-Wei



2017-07-11 3:05 GMT+02:00 ilya :

> Hi Folks,
>
> Promised to help LeaseWeb recruiter with posting Job to "dev" and "user"
> list - apology for cross posting.
>
> Please reach out to recruiter directly, job description can be seen here:
>
> https://drive.google.com/open?id=0B06G3DVBuP9zQXRwMzVKZTJOVlU
>
> Recruiter for this position can be reached here:
> https://www.linkedin.com/in/darwinbpoveda/
>
> Regards
> ilya
>