Isolated Networks and VPC in SG enabled Advanced Zone
Hi all, I have a very small cloud which is setup as a Security Group enabled Advanced Zone, some users wondered why they cannot create VPCs for their accounts although the UI button is present. If they try to add a VPC, no Network Offering and no Zone can be chosen on the view. I assume it is due to the the shared network restriction which comes with the Security Group activation, am I right? Moreover, I've found this wiki page written some years ago concering Security Groups in Advanced Zone: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/plugins/servlet/mobile?contentId=30741651#content/view/30741651 In this document, it is mentioned that in future releases, support for SG in Isolated networks will be added as well as a feature support in VPC networks. Are the two features actually planned for future releases? Otherwise the only way to make isolated networks and VPC work on my zone is to reinstall the whole Zone and disabling Security Groups. Best Regards Mevludin
Re: Strange Virtual Router Problem
Yes. I already confirmed that.
+-+
| service_offering_id |
+-+
| 22 |
+-+
++--+---+--+-+-++---+--+-+--+--+-++-+
| id | cpu | speed | ram_size | nw_rate | mc_rate | ha_enabled |
limit_cpu_use | host_tag | default_use | vm_type | sort_key |
is_volatile | deployment_planner | dynamic_scaling_enabled |
++--+---+--+-+-++---+--+-+--+--+-++-+
| 22 |1 | 500 | 256 |NULL |NULL | 1 |
0 | NULL | 1 | domainrouter |0 | 0 | NULL
| 1 |
++--+---+--+-+-++---+--+-+--+--+-++-+
On Thu, Mar 24, 2022 at 10:39 AM Wei ZHOU wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Can you check the database to see if the service offering is correct ?
>
> select service_offering_id from vm_instance where id=1410;
> select * from service_offering where id=;
>
> -Wei
>
>
>
> On Thu, 24 Mar 2022 at 09:23, Curious Pandora wrote:
>
> > Hello all,
> >
> > After dedicating a pod for system vms (might have nothing to do with the
> > problem )
> > the virtual routers stopped working.
> >
> > The routers cannot launch since they are created with 174080kb of
> memory.
> > 174080
> > 174080
> >
> > According to the logs from the management server indeed the creation
> > parameters include a maxram of 170MB.
> >
> >
> >
> [{"com.cloud.agent.api.StartCommand":{"vm":{"id":"1410","name":"r-1410-VM","state":"Starting","type":"DomainRouter","cpus":"1","minSpeed":"166","maxSpeed":"500","
> > 178257920","maxRam":"(170.00 MB) 178257920","arch":"x86_64","os":"Debian
> > GNU/Linux 11 (64-bit)","platformEmulator":"Debian GNU/Linux 11
> > (64-bit)","bootArgs":" template=domP name=r-1410-VM
> >
> > Checking the database i confirmed that:
> > 1) The system offering for is the default "System Offering For Software
> > Router"
> > 2) At ram_size column the correct value "256" is present
> >
> > Cloudstack is at version: 4.16.1
> >
> > --
> > p4nd0ra - the curious
> >
>
--
p4nd0ra - the curious
VMware Template - To read from OVA or NOT
Hi - I feel like I've asked this in the past; however, my developer colleague has me spinning my wheels trying to get his code to work against this VMware/ACS environment. I'm having trouble with deploying a VM instance using a VMware specific template when I DO NOT use the "Read VM Settings from OVA." When I don't use that setting I set the root disk controller as "lsilogicsas" and NIC to "e1000." The VM deploys however the OS never completely loads, just spins at Windows OS "Getting devices ready." Using the SAME image, with the Read OVA setting - the VM instance deploys and loads the OS without issue. Can someone from ShapeBlue or ACS verify that for VMWARE environments the "Read VM settings from OVA" IS or IS NOT required? If in theory, I should be able to deploy a VM from a template where "Read VM Settings from OVA" is OFF - what could be the issue (I assume its something identified in OVA that is not getting loaded/seen from basic ACS API). Many thanks! Mike Mike Corey Technology Senior Consultant, IT CS CTW Operation & Virtualization Service US SAP AMERICA, INC. 3999 West Chester Pike, Newtown Square, 19073 United States T +1 610 661 0905, M +1 484 274 2658, E mike.co...@sap.com [cid:image001.png@01D83F7E.500DA3D0]
Secondary Storage Check Capacity
Hi all! MB someone are changed size of existing Secondary Storage? I have 1 NFS server which I use as Secondary Storage. Now I have to shrink it. If I do it does CS recalculate size of storage? Внимание! Это электронное письмо и все прикрепленные к нему файлы являются конфиденциальными и предназначены исключительно для использования лицом (лицами), которому (которым) оно предназначено. Если Вы не являетесь лицом (лицами), которому (которым) предназначено это письмо, не копируйте и не разглашайте его содержимое и удалите это сообщение и все вложения из Вашей почтовой системы. Любое несанкционированное использование, распространение, раскрытие, печать или копирование этого электронного письма и прикрепленных к нему файлов, кроме как лицом (лицами) которому (которым) они предназначены, является незаконным и запрещено. Принимая во внимание, что передача данных посредством Интернет не является безопасной, мы не несем никакой ответственности за любой потенциальный ущерб, причиненный в результате ошибок при передаче данных или этим сообщением и прикрепленными к нему файлами. Attention! This email and all attachments to it are confidential and are intended solely for use by the person (or persons) referred to (mentioned) as the intended recipient (recipients). If you are not the intended recipient of this email, do not copy or disclose its contents and delete the message and any attachments to it from your e-mail system. Any unauthorized use, dissemination, disclosure, printing or copying of this e-mail and files attached to it, except by the intended recipient, is illegal and is prohibited. Taking into account that data transmission via Internet is not secure, we assume no responsibility for any potential damage caused by data transmission errors or this message and the files attached to it.
VR/SystemVM upgradation after cloudStack upgradation
Hello Guys, We have multiple Cloudstack deployment across all environment, Whenever we upgrade Cloudstack it’s required to upgrade the systemVM templates and routers, sometimes it’s very hard to ask downtime for VR upgradation( for upgrading the VR ). So is there any way or hack so that we won’t need to upgrade the VRs after upgrading the Cloudstack. Because in every case new provisioning won’t happen until we upgrade the VR. Regards, Vivek Kumar -- This message is intended only for the use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient, please delete the original message and any copy of it from your computer system. You are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited unless proper authorization has been obtained for such action. If you have received this communication in error, please notify the sender immediately. Although IndiQus attempts to sweep e-mail and attachments for viruses, it does not guarantee that both are virus-free and accepts no liability for any damage sustained as a result of viruses.
Re: Boot VM into BIOS after deployment
hi piotr, thanks for your Link - as always high quality stuff. But the information there is more about on how to enable UEFI at all. For me it is more the basic task to boot a vm directly into bios mode without juggeling the console proxy to hit f2 at the right time. There has been an issue for this https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/issues/3583 Which lead to an setting, that you can reboot a vm directly to bios from the gui while using vmware. Now my question is, if there is something simila availeable for kvm - or how one can "easily" enter the bios of a deployed VM. regards, chris Am Do., 24. März 2022 um 09:41 Uhr schrieb Piotr Pisz : > Hello, > > Here you will find the information you need: > https://lab.piszki.pl/cloudstack-vm-with-vtpm-and-secure-boot-uefi/ > > Regards, > Piotr > > > -Original Message- > From: vas...@gmx.de > Sent: Wednesday, March 23, 2022 5:29 PM > To: users@cloudstack.apache.org > Subject: Boot VM into BIOS after deployment > > hi everyone, > > currently i am looking for a way to boot a vm into bios / uefi. The > challange for me is, that i would like to enable the actual users to do so > via the GUI / ConsoleProxy GUI. > However using the consoleproxy GUI is kind of challangeing to the actual > booting speed. > I found that there is a option availeable when vmware is used as a > hypervisor... > Is there somthing similar availeable for kvm? How do you manage to boot > into bios / uefi if needed? > > regards, > chris > >
CSEUG Speaker Announcement: Peter Motykowski, AWS
Hi everyone, I am excited to share that at the CSEUG on April 7th, we will have a special speaker: Peter (Motyka) Motykowski - a Sr. Software Development Manager - Customer Engineering at Amazon Web Services (AWS). Peter will present the talk “A Kubernetes CAPI Provider for Apache CloudStack”. And he will be joining us virtually from Denver, Colorado! Discover the new Kubernetes CAPI (Cluster-API) provider for Apache CloudStack "CAPC", enabling you to manage a range of Kubernetes clusters across Apache CloudStack and other supported infrastructure providers! If you still have not registered for the event, do it now: https://events.hubilo.com/cloudstack-european-user-group/register Kind regards,
RE: Boot VM into BIOS after deployment
Hello, Here you will find the information you need: https://lab.piszki.pl/cloudstack-vm-with-vtpm-and-secure-boot-uefi/ Regards, Piotr -Original Message- From: vas...@gmx.de Sent: Wednesday, March 23, 2022 5:29 PM To: users@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Boot VM into BIOS after deployment hi everyone, currently i am looking for a way to boot a vm into bios / uefi. The challange for me is, that i would like to enable the actual users to do so via the GUI / ConsoleProxy GUI. However using the consoleproxy GUI is kind of challangeing to the actual booting speed. I found that there is a option availeable when vmware is used as a hypervisor... Is there somthing similar availeable for kvm? How do you manage to boot into bios / uefi if needed? regards, chris
Re: Strange Virtual Router Problem
Hi,
Can you check the database to see if the service offering is correct ?
select service_offering_id from vm_instance where id=1410;
select * from service_offering where id=;
-Wei
On Thu, 24 Mar 2022 at 09:23, Curious Pandora wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> After dedicating a pod for system vms (might have nothing to do with the
> problem )
> the virtual routers stopped working.
>
> The routers cannot launch since they are created with 174080kb of memory.
> 174080
> 174080
>
> According to the logs from the management server indeed the creation
> parameters include a maxram of 170MB.
>
>
> [{"com.cloud.agent.api.StartCommand":{"vm":{"id":"1410","name":"r-1410-VM","state":"Starting","type":"DomainRouter","cpus":"1","minSpeed":"166","maxSpeed":"500","
> 178257920","maxRam":"(170.00 MB) 178257920","arch":"x86_64","os":"Debian
> GNU/Linux 11 (64-bit)","platformEmulator":"Debian GNU/Linux 11
> (64-bit)","bootArgs":" template=domP name=r-1410-VM
>
> Checking the database i confirmed that:
> 1) The system offering for is the default "System Offering For Software
> Router"
> 2) At ram_size column the correct value "256" is present
>
> Cloudstack is at version: 4.16.1
>
> --
> p4nd0ra - the curious
>
Strange Virtual Router Problem
Hello all,
After dedicating a pod for system vms (might have nothing to do with the
problem )
the virtual routers stopped working.
The routers cannot launch since they are created with 174080kb of memory.
174080
174080
According to the logs from the management server indeed the creation
parameters include a maxram of 170MB.
[{"com.cloud.agent.api.StartCommand":{"vm":{"id":"1410","name":"r-1410-VM","state":"Starting","type":"DomainRouter","cpus":"1","minSpeed":"166","maxSpeed":"500","
178257920","maxRam":"(170.00 MB) 178257920","arch":"x86_64","os":"Debian
GNU/Linux 11 (64-bit)","platformEmulator":"Debian GNU/Linux 11
(64-bit)","bootArgs":" template=domP name=r-1410-VM
Checking the database i confirmed that:
1) The system offering for is the default "System Offering For Software
Router"
2) At ram_size column the correct value "256" is present
Cloudstack is at version: 4.16.1
--
p4nd0ra - the curious
Strange Virtual Router Problem
Hello all,
After dedicating a pod for system vms (might have nothing to do with the
problem )
the virtual routers stopped working.
The routers cannot launch since they are created with 174080kb of memory.
174080
174080
According to the logs from the management server indeed the creation
parameters include a maxram of 170MB.
[{"com.cloud.agent.api.StartCommand":{"vm":{"id":"1410","name":"r-1410-VM","state":"Starting","type":"DomainRouter","cpus":"1","minSpeed":"166","maxSpeed":"500","
178257920","maxRam":"(170.00 MB) 178257920","arch":"x86_64","os":"Debian
GNU/Linux 11 (64-bit)","platformEmulator":"Debian GNU/Linux 11
(64-bit)","bootArgs":" template=domP name=r-1410-VM
Checking the database i confirmed that:
1) The system offering for is the default "System Offering For Software
Router"
2) At ram_size column the correct value "256" is present
Cloudstack is at version: 4.16.1
--
p4nd0ra - the curious
