[libreoffice-users] How do I stop show sublevels from changing
Hi, I'm using numbering outline for some manuscripts. I would like my numbering to be simple: I. A. 1. a. As default, LibreOffice initially shows all the sublevels: for example, I. A. A.1. A.1.a. I change the show sublevels to 1 by using ToolsOutline numbering. Everything changes as expected in the document. But, when I reopen the doc after saving and closing it, the sublevels are changed back to the default. How do I stop this from happening? -- View this message in context: http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/How-do-I-stop-show-sublevels-from-changing-tp3553459p3553459.html Sent from the Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. -- For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to: users+h...@global.libreoffice.org Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
[libreoffice-users] Re: How do I stop show sublevels from changing
I think I found the answer. When I save the doc as a Word doc (.docx), the number of sublevels changes back to the default upon reopening. However, if I save the doc as .odt, the number of sublevels do not change. Is this a bug? -- View this message in context: http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/How-do-I-stop-show-sublevels-from-changing-tp3553459p3553491.html Sent from the Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. -- For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to: users+h...@global.libreoffice.org Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
Re: [libreoffice-users] Re: How do I stop show sublevels from changing
Hi, gjt wrote (02-12-11 02:42) I think I found the answer. When I save the doc as a Word doc (.docx), the number of sublevels changes back to the default upon reopening. However, if I save the doc as .odt, the number of sublevels do not change. Is this a bug? Indeed this looks as something that is not yet fully implemented in the docx filtering. Anyway I guess it's possible to save the info in the docx file.. regards, -- - Cor - http://nl.libreoffice.org -- For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to: users+h...@global.libreoffice.org Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
Re: [libreoffice-users] Template dialogue
Yes you are able to get copies of the earlier JREs. http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/java/archive-139210.html It takes a little effort to find it, since they do not want you to install the older ones. Although they have version 6 update 29 as the newest, they do not have update 28 in the archive. You have to create an account with Oracle though. To be honest, if you run Linux, I prefer to use whatever the default JRE is. I went to the Package Manager and searched for JRE and I saw the package called default JRE. If you run Windows, or Linux, and do not want to create an account with Oracle, I have most of the Windows versions downloaded, and could download the Linux ones. Then I could send the ones you need via an off-list email. On 12/01/2011 06:06 PM, Tom Davies wrote: Hi :) OpenJDK is also run by Oracle and suffers about the same. I'm not sure about the best version numbers numbers for that either. I don't know if the community that work hard on that are able to free it from Oracle in the way that TDF freed LibreOffice from them. I don't know if it is still possible to get a copy of the older version of java from the Oracle website. You used to have to register at their site to get them. Java dependence is being written out but you still notice slow-downs in wizards, some Extensions, the embedded database (best to use a separate back-end such as Postgresql) and when starting-up LibreOffice Regards from Tom :) --- On Thu, 1/12/11, Lívio Ciprianolcipri...@iol.pt wrote: From: Lívio Ciprianolcipri...@iol.pt Subject: Re: [libreoffice-users] Template dialogue To: users@global.libreoffice.org Date: Thursday, 1 December, 2011, 22:45 On 01 December 2011 10:22:44 Tom Davies wrote: My guess is that you are on 6u24. Hi Tom, I'm using 6u92 :-) But with OpenOffice it's fast. Any hint? Presently I don't have installed LibreOffice, so I can't do some experiments, but any guess if I use openJDK? Regards, Lívio Cipriano -- For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to: users+h...@global.libreoffice.org Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
Re: [libreoffice-users] Re: Unwanted horizontal white hairline rules in PDF in Mac Preview
On 12/01/2011 06:10 PM, NoOp wrote: On 12/01/2011 10:55 AM, bh wrote: I just switched from NeoOffice to LibreOffice on my Mac. LibreOffice is much more reliable! I was getting mysterious disappearances of pictures in NeoOffice and have had no such problems since the switch. But one new problem is that when I export a PDF and then view it in Preview (in MacOS 10.6.8), there are full-width hairline white horizontal rules aligned with the top edge of some JPGs in the document. These rules don't appear when I view the document in Adobe Reader, but they do seem to appear when I /print/ even from Adobe Reader. So I'm guessing the exported PDF has some not-quite-standard feature that isn't working in MacOS. An example is at http://cs.berkeley.edu/~bh/bug.pdf ... Perhaps I'm missing the obvious, but when I view that PDF in Adobe Reader 9.4.6 (linux) I see not hairline white horizontal rules (even at 200% zoom). Nor do I see them in Evince or Okular. Printing from AR 9.4.6 (linux) to an Epson WorkForce 635 doesn't reveal any either. Maybe it's a Mac issue? I was looking at it with the default viewer for Ubuntu 10.04LTS. Whether it is Adobe or not, I do not remember if I installed it, it may not be an issue for everyone. The viewing and the printing that shows the hairline might be a system dependent issue. It could be a resolution issue for printing and viewing. If you print it out with graphics at 150 dots-per-inch, it may be there, or not. At 300 dpi is could be there, or not. At 600 dpi, the same. It could just depend on what the printer settings are at for the print job. For me, I use 300 dpi for standard printing of graphics, but for printing of documents that will be reproduced and given out, I go for 600 dpi or greater. I just printed it out on my Epson Artisan printer. I use US Letter paper so I used shrink to fit page and use the print quality option for text with image. Also I did not use borderless printing. When I looked at the I did not find any hairlines at all. Of course, there was wide borders on the top and bottom of the landscape orientation paper, so to me the original size was not 11 inches by 8.5 inches. Maybe it was 11 by 7.25 originally. So my printing did not show any hairlines. Are you printing it out on an Inkjet printer or a Color Laser printer? I just tried it on an HP Color Laserjet 2600n. No hairline there as well. -- For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to: users+h...@global.libreoffice.org Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
Re: [libreoffice-users] Re: [libreoffice-marketing] Standalone PDF
For Windows, I use doPDF, which places a printer in you printer list that prints to a PDF file. I know that Linux may have a PDF printer option installed by default, but what little testing I have used for it, I find that I prefer to install CUPS-PDF printer and use it. It creates a better file name and has more print options, but it will only place the file in the default PDF folder. I never heard of PDF-Redirect. I went to there site. I wonder what print options it has compared to doPDF and the non-free PDF995 and CutePDF? I have been using doPDF for years on Windows, since I was creating e-newsletter version of the printed ones back in the late 90's and early 00's. I never changed. When I went to Linux as my default desktop platform in Feb 2010, I looked for a good PDF printer. CUPS-PDF was the one that came up in the repository search. So, there are many different ways to print a PDF file, internal-exporting and various PDF printers. You must try a few on your platform and choose which one is the beat for you. On 12/02/2011 06:36 AM, Onyeibo Oku wrote: In Windows you can use PDF-Redirect. Its free and efficient. In Linux, a PDF printer come installed by default in most distributions. No extra installations required - from twohot@device.mobile :) -Original Message- From: Tom Daviestomdavie...@yahoo.co.uk Date: Fri, 2 Dec 2011 11:23:39 To:users@global.libreoffice.org;disc...@documentfoundation.org;market...@global.libreoffice.org;des...@global.libreoffice.org Reply-To: users@global.libreoffice.org Subject: [libreoffice-users] Re: [libreoffice-marketing] Standalone PDF Hi :) No. Most of the apps all go together. Base is sometimes a separate thing that can be added but i don't think Base works on it's own. In GnuLinux (such as Ubuntu, Mageia, RedHat) it might be possible to just use your normal package manager to find and install something else that does a convert to pdf. In Windows there are a few things, perhaps doPDF but they are independant projects. Google search (or Bing or whatever) might help you find a 3rd party app to do the job. Regards from Tom :) --- On Fri, 2/12/11, Paulagen...@yahoo.com wrote: From: Paulagen...@yahoo.com Subject: [libreoffice-marketing] Standalone PDF To: users@global.libreoffice.org, disc...@documentfoundation.org, market...@global.libreoffice.org, des...@global.libreoffice.org Date: Friday, 2 December, 2011, 4:12 Does Libre office have a stand alone PDF application? ie - does Libre provide the PDF editor by itself without all the other features in the 200 MB download - is it possible to install only the PDF tool without all the other features ? All responses appreciated. Thanks, Paula -- For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to: users+h...@global.libreoffice.org Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
Re: [libreoffice-users] Re: [libreoffice-marketing] Standalone PDF
Hi, In Linux (I run Ubuntu.) you can install cups-pdf. When you want to print a document, select cups-pdf as the printer. It has worked very reliably for me. For Windows, I know nothing about doPDF. Source Forge has PDFCreator for Windows, and it is free from spy ware, advertising, etc. Use it like cups-pdf except in Windows. Don On 12/02/2011 06:23 AM, Tom Davies wrote: Hi :) No. Most of the apps all go together. Base is sometimes a separate thing that can be added but i don't think Base works on it's own. In GnuLinux (such as Ubuntu, Mageia, RedHat) it might be possible to just use your normal package manager to find and install something else that does a convert to pdf. In Windows there are a few things, perhaps doPDF but they are independant projects. Google search (or Bing or whatever) might help you find a 3rd party app to do the job. Regards from Tom :) --- On Fri, 2/12/11, Paulagen...@yahoo.com wrote: From: Paulagen...@yahoo.com Subject: [libreoffice-marketing] Standalone PDF To: users@global.libreoffice.org, disc...@documentfoundation.org, market...@global.libreoffice.org, des...@global.libreoffice.org Date: Friday, 2 December, 2011, 4:12 Does Libre office have a stand alone PDF application? ie - does Libre provide the PDF editor by itself without all the other features in the 200 MB download - is it possible to install only the PDF tool without all the other features ? All responses appreciated. Thanks, Paula -- -- For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to: users+h...@global.libreoffice.org Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
[libreoffice-users] Template dialogue
* All the previous versions of Java Runtime Environment are also available at FileHippo (http://www.filehippo.com/download_jre_32/). * It's not necessary to open an account there. * version 6 update 28 is not there either. *=== webmaster for Kracked Press Productions wrote*: date: Fri, Dec 2, 2011 at 5:33 AM Re: [libreoffice-users] Template dialogue Yes you are able to get copies of the earlier JREs. http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/java/archive-139210.html It takes a little effort to find it, since they do not want you to install the older ones. Although they have version 6 update 29 as the newest, they do not have update 28 in the archive. You have to create an account with Oracle though. To be honest, if you run Linux, I prefer to use whatever the default JRE is. I went to the Package Manager and searched for JRE and I saw the package called default JRE. If you run Windows, or Linux, and do not want to create an account with Oracle, I have most of the Windows versions downloaded, and could download the Linux ones. Then I could send the ones you need via an off-list email. -- For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to: users+h...@global.libreoffice.org Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
[libreoffice-users] Re: [libreoffice-marketing] Standalone PDF
krackedpress wrote For Windows, I use doPDF, which places a printer in you printer list that prints to a PDF file. -snip- I never heard of PDF-Redirect. I went to there site. I wonder what print options it has compared to doPDF and the non-free PDF995 and CutePDF? I have been using doPDF for years on Windows, since I was creating e-newsletter version of the printed ones back in the late 90's and early 00's. I never changed. Since LibreOffice is a Free/Libre Open Source Software (FLOSS) project I think we should recommend other FLOSS projects: I use (daily) and recommend PDF Creator (http://sourceforge.net/projects/pdfcreator/) which does exactly the same as doPDF under Windows. -- View this message in context: http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/Re-libreoffice-marketing-Standalone-PDF-tp3554390p3554728.html Sent from the Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. -- For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to: users+h...@global.libreoffice.org Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
[libreoffice-users] Re: Unwanted horizontal white hairline rules in PDF in Mac Preview
I have just viewed this in Adobe Acrobat and it is OK I imported it into Libre 3.4.4 on my iMac using Lion and found that the whole page is covered with a grid. The lines are vertical as well as horizontal. Tink -- View this message in context: http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/Unwanted-horizontal-white-hairline-rules-in-PDF-in-Mac-Preview-tp3552492p3554946.html Sent from the Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. -- For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to: users+h...@global.libreoffice.org Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
Re: [libreoffice-users] Re: Unwanted horizontal white hairline rules in PDF in Mac Preview
Why am I getting these e-mails about white lines, I don't have any white lines This is not a good start First Libre Office has hijacked my word docs and turned them into Note Pad Then your users+subscr...@global.libreoffice.org e-mail address comes back as:- Wait for it!! Sorry, we were unable to deliver your message to the following address. users+subscr...@global.libreoffice.org: Remote host said: 554 5.7.0 Reject, id=09370-06 - SPAM [BODY] Can I please have someone to help me with my problem or I will junk Libre and go back to Open Office.org!!! From: Tinkerer Sent: Friday, December 02, 2011 3:44 PM To: users@global.libreoffice.org Subject: [libreoffice-users] Re: Unwanted horizontal white hairline rules in PDF in Mac Preview I have just viewed this in Adobe Acrobat and it is OK I imported it into Libre 3.4.4 on my iMac using Lion and found that the whole page is covered with a grid. The lines are vertical as well as horizontal. Tink -- View this message in context: http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/Unwanted-horizontal-white-hairline-rules-in-PDF-in-Mac-Preview-tp3552492p3554946.html Sent from the Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. -- For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to: users+h...@global.libreoffice.org Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted -- For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to: users+h...@global.libreoffice.org Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
Re: [libreoffice-users] Re: Unwanted horizontal white hairline rules in PDF in Mac Preview
Why am I getting these e-mails about white lines, I don't have any white lines This is not a good start First Libre Office has hijacked my word docs and turned them into Note Pad Then your users+subscr...@global.libreoffice.org e-mail address comes back as:- Wait for it!! Sorry, we were unable to deliver your message to the following address. users+subscr...@global.libreoffice.org: Remote host said: 554 5.7.0 Reject, id=09370-06 - SPAM [BODY] Can I please have someone to help me with my problem or I will junk Libre and go back to Open Office.org!!! From: Tinkerer From: Tinkerer Sent: Friday, December 02, 2011 3:44 PM To: users@global.libreoffice.org Subject: [libreoffice-users] Re: Unwanted horizontal white hairline rules in PDF in Mac Preview I have just viewed this in Adobe Acrobat and it is OK I imported it into Libre 3.4.4 on my iMac using Lion and found that the whole page is covered with a grid. The lines are vertical as well as horizontal. Tink -- View this message in context: http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/Unwanted-horizontal-white-hairline-rules-in-PDF-in-Mac-Preview-tp3552492p3554946.html Sent from the Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. -- For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to: users+h...@global.libreoffice.org Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted -- For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to: users+h...@global.libreoffice.org Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
Re: [libreoffice-users] Re: [libreoffice-marketing] Standalone PDF
I do not think doPDF if a true FLOSS package, but it is free. I have not worked with PDF-Redirect or PDF Creator before. It might be interesting to see if they can be installed side by side and compare their features. Maybe do the same for the default PDF printer for Linux vs. CUPS-PDF. Maybe have ones that work for MacOSX listed as well. THEN list the options that are part of the Export-to-PDF that is a part of LO. I know I use doPDF and CUPS-PDF when I need to use non-standard fonts [like ones that look like they have snow on the letters or ones that have letters inside Christmas lights], or ding-bats and icon related fonts. Export-to-PDF does not embed those type of fonts, yet. So I need a PDF printer that can embed the needed fonts. It makes the files larger, but they will print exactly they way I want them to. I use CUP-PDF many time a day. Any email, web page, or other non-LO document, that I want saved or printed out later. I print it to PDF then choose which pages I print to paper. I then avoid a lot of pages that I do not need to print out. I saved maybe 2000 sheets of paper that way, plus now that I can print duplex, I can print the PDF file double sided vie the default PDF viewer. LO will not print duplex pages for my inkjet duplex printer. So I must use print to PDF first. On 12/02/2011 09:06 AM, Pedro wrote: krackedpress wrote For Windows, I use doPDF, which places a printer in you printer list that prints to a PDF file. -snip- I never heard of PDF-Redirect. I went to there site. I wonder what print options it has compared to doPDF and the non-free PDF995 and CutePDF? I have been using doPDF for years on Windows, since I was creating e-newsletter version of the printed ones back in the late 90's and early 00's. I never changed. Since LibreOffice is a Free/Libre Open Source Software (FLOSS) project I think we should recommend other FLOSS projects: I use (daily) and recommend PDF Creator (http://sourceforge.net/projects/pdfcreator/) which does exactly the same as doPDF under Windows. -- View this message in context: http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/Re-libreoffice-marketing-Standalone-PDF-tp3554390p3554728.html Sent from the Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. -- For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to: users+h...@global.libreoffice.org Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
[libreoffice-users] Re: Unwanted horizontal white hairline rules in PDF in Mac Preview
When I originally posted this problem I didn't have access to a color printer because I was travelling. Now I'm home and when I print either directly from LibreOffice or via Export PDF and then Preview, there are no white lines. But they're clearly visible on the screen, and they aren't grid lines or tiling problems; they are far from evenly spaced. But since it seems to print correctly, I guess I should downgrade this from a deal-killer to an annoyance. I'll report back if it prints incorrectly on the commercial 11x17 full bleed printer I'll be using for the final document. Thanks, all! -- View this message in context: http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/Unwanted-horizontal-white-hairline-rules-in-PDF-in-Mac-Preview-tp3552492p3555134.html Sent from the Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. -- For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to: users+h...@global.libreoffice.org Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
Re: [libreoffice-users] Template dialogue
I think Oracle removed 28 for some reason. I have update 20-29 [less 28] for Windows. I stick with whatever is in the repository for Linux. I made the mistake of using the online install package ONCE. So I download and use the offline installs whenever that are available. On 12/02/2011 08:59 AM, Stephen Anderson wrote: * All the previous versions of Java Runtime Environment are also available at FileHippo (http://www.filehippo.com/download_jre_32/). * It's not necessary to open an account there. * version 6 update 28 is not there either. *=== webmaster for Kracked Press Productions wrote*: date: Fri, Dec 2, 2011 at 5:33 AM Re: [libreoffice-users] Template dialogue Yes you are able to get copies of the earlier JREs. http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/java/archive-139210.html It takes a little effort to find it, since they do not want you to install the older ones. Although they have version 6 update 29 as the newest, they do not have update 28 in the archive. You have to create an account with Oracle though. To be honest, if you run Linux, I prefer to use whatever the default JRE is. I went to the Package Manager and searched for JRE and I saw the package called default JRE. If you run Windows, or Linux, and do not want to create an account with Oracle, I have most of the Windows versions downloaded, and could download the Linux ones. Then I could send the ones you need via an off-list email. -- For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to: users+h...@global.libreoffice.org Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
Re: [libreoffice-users] Re: Unwanted horizontal white hairline rules in PDF in Mac Preview
As I zoom in more and more, most of the white hairlines started to go away. So it might be a display issue for part of the problem. At 100%, I had a lot of grid lines. At 200% had only about forth of the left. At 300% I had only 3 left. On 12/02/2011 12:13 PM, bh wrote: When I originally posted this problem I didn't have access to a color printer because I was travelling. Now I'm home and when I print either directly from LibreOffice or via Export PDF and then Preview, there are no white lines. But they're clearly visible on the screen, and they aren't grid lines or tiling problems; they are far from evenly spaced. But since it seems to print correctly, I guess I should downgrade this from a deal-killer to an annoyance. I'll report back if it prints incorrectly on the commercial 11x17 full bleed printer I'll be using for the final document. Thanks, all! -- View this message in context: http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/Unwanted-horizontal-white-hairline-rules-in-PDF-in-Mac-Preview-tp3552492p3555134.html Sent from the Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. -- For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to: users+h...@global.libreoffice.org Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
[libreoffice-users] Re: Unwanted horizontal white hairline rules in PDF in Mac Preview
Not for me -- they get clearer and sharper as I zoom in. I'll attach an excerpt from a screenshot. http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/file/n3555176/Preview001.png -- View this message in context: http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/Unwanted-horizontal-white-hairline-rules-in-PDF-in-Mac-Preview-tp3552492p3555176.html Sent from the Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. -- For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to: users+h...@global.libreoffice.org Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
[libreoffice-users] Re: Unwanted horizontal white hairline rules in PDF in Mac Preview
Hi :) Is it a rendering issue? Perhaps an old driver? Codec or something? Is there any way to check such things on a Mac? Regards from Tom :) -- View this message in context: http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/Unwanted-horizontal-white-hairline-rules-in-PDF-in-Mac-Preview-tp3552492p3555302.html Sent from the Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. -- For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to: users+h...@global.libreoffice.org Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
Re: [libreoffice-users] Re: [libreoffice-marketing] Standalone PDF
On 2011-12-02 8:02 AM, webmaster for Kracked Press Productions wrote: I never heard of PDF-Redirect. I went to there site. I wonder what print options it has compared to doPDF and the non-free PDF995 and CutePDF? I have been using doPDF for years on Windows, since I was creating e-newsletter version of the printed ones back in the late 90's and early 00's. I never changed. When I went to Linux as my default desktop platform in Feb 2010, I looked for a good PDF printer. CUPS-PDF was the one that came up in the repository search. So, there are many different ways to print a PDF file, internal-exporting and various PDF printers. You must try a few on your platform and choose which one is the beat for you. I use PDFCreator from PDFforge http://www.pdfforge.org/ which is a virtual printer on Windows like doPDF and many others — but is also Open Source. -- For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to: users+h...@global.libreoffice.org Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
Re: [libreoffice-users] IMPRESS : standard page layouts
Mélodie wrote (02-12-11 12:41) I am wondering if I can modify these? The 2 most useful layouts for me (3 boxes that allow a 1/4 page picture in the top right or bottom right corner) aren't available, and I would like to create them as standard layouts. I haven't been able to find anything on how to do this, any ideas? I don't remember either. You could try to fiddle around it? Or look in BugZilla if an issue already exists. http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/BugReport (Don't hesitate to ask assistance if needed.) I see there is also this: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/BugReport_Details#Presentation where e.g. Formatting should show all bugs with formatting, so maybe also your issue? Cheers, -- - Cor - http://nl.libreoffice.org -- For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to: users+h...@global.libreoffice.org Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
Re: [libreoffice-users] IMPRESS : standard page layouts
Cor Nouws wrote (02-12-11 22:37) You could try to fiddle around it? Just found out that you can at least have some influence. In the slide master (View SLide master) you can resize / move the frame. That influences the size/position of the frames that are choosen with the layouts... -- - Cor - http://nl.libreoffice.org -- For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to: users+h...@global.libreoffice.org Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
Re: [libreoffice-users] Re: Unwanted horizontal white hairline rules in PDF in Mac Preview
No, I did not see the hairline lines there with my zooming in. You did say you do not see it in the last color printing you did? If you see the lines in one place and I see them in a different place[s], it has to be something no associated with the actual file.It must be a monitor viewing issue or something. On 12/02/2011 12:29 PM, bh wrote: Not for me -- they get clearer and sharper as I zoom in. I'll attach an excerpt from a screenshot. http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/file/n3555176/Preview001.png -- View this message in context: http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/Unwanted-horizontal-white-hairline-rules-in-PDF-in-Mac-Preview-tp3552492p3555176.html Sent from the Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. -- For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to: users+h...@global.libreoffice.org Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
[libreoffice-users] Re: Unwanted horizontal white hairline rules in PDF in Mac Preview
I'm sure it's a rendering issue. But it didn't happen when I was using NeoOffice, and I'd like to find out what's different in the PDF to cause it, to see if I can work around the problem. -- View this message in context: http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/Unwanted-horizontal-white-hairline-rules-in-PDF-in-Mac-Preview-tp3552492p3556179.html Sent from the Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. -- For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to: users+h...@global.libreoffice.org Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
Re: [libreoffice-users] Re: Problem with Linux open nouveau video driver
I was not aware of Leigh's advice until I saw your response here. So I found and followed his advice, and, I still see issues. Note that I do still see the driver, however rpm -qa | grep -i nouveau xorg-x11-drv-nouveau-0.0.16-27.20110720gitb806e3f.fc16.x86_64 Then again, I also see all sorts of kmod stuff rpm -qa | grep -i nvidia xorg-x11-drv-nvidia-libs-290.10-1.fc16.x86_64 kmod-nvidia-3.1.2-1.fc16.x86_64-290.10-1.fc16.1.x86_64 nvidia-settings-1.0-13.fc16.x86_64 akmod-nvidia-290.10-1.fc16.1.x86_64 xorg-x11-drv-nvidia-290.10-1.fc16.x86_64 nvidia-xconfig-1.0-11.fc16.x86_64 kmod-nvidia-3.1.1-1.fc16.x86_64-290.06-1.fc16.2.x86_64 kmod-nvidia-3.1.1-2.fc16.x86_64-290.06-1.fc16.3.x86_64 On 12/02/2011 03:18 AM, Onyeibo Oku wrote: If you're running kmod nvidia drivers then you are not running nouveau. Nouveau runs out-of-the-box (fresh installation) and has proven to be more headache-free. I have not noticed this issue. Could this be peculiar to a file? Can you describe steps to replicate it without transferring a sample file? I am presently running nouveau with LO without issues on F16 but I probably haven't gone your route. My experience with kmod-nvidia and the sister akmod-nvidia is that they conflict with nouveau especially if nouveau is not silenced. Did U follow leigh's instructions at forums.fedoraforum.org? - from twohot@device.mobile :) -Original Message- From: Jay Lozierjsloz...@gmail.com Date: Fri, 02 Dec 2011 01:11:58 To:users@global.libreoffice.org Reply-To: users@global.libreoffice.org Subject: Re: [libreoffice-users] Re: Problem with Linux open nouveau video driver On 12/01/2011 10:16 PM, Andrew Douglas Pitonyak wrote: On 12/01/2011 10:05 PM, NoOp wrote: On 11/30/2011 05:04 PM, Jonathan Schultz wrote: Hello, For some time I've found that libreoffice (and openoffice before it) had trouble rendering text with the Linux open 'nouveau' (as opposed to the proprietary NVIDIA) driver. What appears to happen is that everything above a certain point is good, but below it the text simply doesn't appear. I've not seen any other application that has the same problem. I've attached a typical screenshot to demonstrate the effect. It always helps if you: 1) tell others what version of LO you are having issues with (and also if it is from LO or some other source; linux distribution repository or PPA, etc), 2) what OS type and version (there are about thousands of versions of linux). My /guess/ is that you are running some form of Ubuntu, if correct please tell us which version you are running. Cannot comment on this poster, but, I have seen a very similar issue on both OOo and LO. I see this on Linux, not on Windows. I had the problem with Fedora 15 and also Fedora 16. Both are 64-bit versions. I use the KMod drivers for NVidia installed from the repositories. I see the issues with other applications as well, but the primary offenders are OOo and QT. Using Ubuntu 11.04 and 11.10 base and derivatives (Pinguy and Mint), both 64 bit, I have not seen this behavior. AFAIK the drivers were/are ATI Radeon from the repository. The actual drivers were auto-installed on installation and left unchanged. The desktops include both Gnome 2.? and Gnome 3.2. It appears that the problem is limited to the NVidia drivers. -- Andrew Pitonyak My Macro Document: http://www.pitonyak.org/AndrewMacro.odt Info: http://www.pitonyak.org/oo.php -- For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to: users+h...@global.libreoffice.org Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
[libreoffice-users] RE: Video output from Impress
Thanks for your help Drew, I have finished the presentation and put it on to DVD and it works. The method was a bit involved but all worked fairly simply; I created the slideshow in Impress mainly because I wanted to have a scrapbook type of look to it and Impress has a background that just looks like a wire bound book page so I used it. Then the problems started when I tried to output it to DVD, the SWF file produced by Impress didn’t seem to want to open in anything, not even a dedicated Flash Player. S, I then exported each image as a tiff file and used an application called Imagination to produce the slide show, the only complaint was that it didn’t have a transition that looked like a page turning so I used random selection of the many provided instead. Imagination produced a VOB file which I was able to open in DeVeDe and author it to an iso image which I then burned to DVD with K3B. Anyway all a lot of mucking around from one package to another but a more than satisfactory result. Cheers Rod From: drewjensen [via Document Foundation Mail Archive] [mailto:ml-node+s969070n3540591...@n3.nabble.com] Sent: Monday, 28 November 2011 3:18 AM To: rod Subject: RE: Video output from Impress On Sat, 2011-11-26 at 23:42 -0800, rod wrote: Thanks for that Drew, I will download swfdec flash player and try it. I have made a slideshow in Impress, there’s half a gig of it, it is simply a series of still images in four sections with some music in the background with 10s between slide changes; I want to put the presentation onto a DVD that can be played on a standard DVD player. The presentation is on a machine running Ubuntu 11.10 but I can port it to a Windoze machine if necessary. If I’d thought it was going to be this hard I’d have used some other authoring method. The main stumbling block seems to be the SWF file but I’ll try with your recommendation. Hi Rod, Yes, to be fair Impress would not have been my first choice for this at all - and it still might be worth the time to switch to something like OpenShot - if the images are on your disc then putting something like this together should be a very quick exercise. Just to answer the other query here - I tend to use XVidCap for screen captures - but you have to understand that this will not get you a full 25 frames per second, let alone 30 FPS - on my machine I can get maybe 13 FPS if I run Impress and the capture utility under the same host and this means that you have to double all your timings as when the final render is done at 25 FPS. So when I need to do this what I do is use VirtualBox to run Impress in a guest OS (usually OpenSuse) and run the screen capture utility in the Host - this will get me maybe another 4 FPS on the capture without having to drop the quality and or size during capture. Finally - OpenShot is really nice for video effects and not bad for working with audio - but my workflow is usually to use both OpenShot for video transitions and then mix the audio tack(s) into this using PitiVi. I know that sounds a bit convoluted but once you have done it a few times you can get fairly quick. I'll give you an example - a few weeks back I tuned in to a live broadcast by Jono Bacon (canonical) about, amongst other things, loco-teams and at the end of his broadcast he grabs his axe and starts to riff...cool. So - I quick turn on soundrecorder to capture the audio - jump to the Ubuntu wiki and grab a piece of art work - use GIMP to produce a couple quick images for text overlay and use OpenShot to mix it up. Literally 30 minutes after his broadcast is finished I was able to upload this little (a bit rough on audio level..) video: http://baseanswers.com/ubuntu/ubutu200.mp4 [BTW consider this public domain] Anyway - long way to say - if this project is worth doing, you really should consider doing it with the right tools and Impress isn't it, IMO. Best wishes, //drew Cheers Rod From: drewjensen [via Document Foundation Mail Archive] [mailto:[hidden email]] Sent: Sunday, 27 November 2011 11:56 AM To: rod Subject: RE: Video output from Impress Hello Rod On Sat, 2011-11-26 at 20:52 -0600, jorge wrote: Hi I use Swfdec Flash Player to view that kind of files... but it isn't like a movie, it is like a presentation. Right and if all you want is flip chart type stuff then sure output to SWF is fine, but if you are looking for a bit more (custom animations for instance) then what I do is use a screen capture utility to generate the video file. Then I take the raw input into video editors, with not too much effort you can get some decent results. Also before you ask - if you are using Windows, I have no idea what tools to use - if Linux, ask away. Best wishes, //drew Adress: http://swfdec.freedesktop.org/ Regards, Jorge
Re: [libreoffice-users] Re: Problem with Linux open nouveau video driver
What's your output for: lsmod nvidia - from twohot@device.mobile :) -Original Message- From: Andrew Douglas Pitonyak and...@pitonyak.org Date: Fri, 02 Dec 2011 21:57:16 To: users@global.libreoffice.org Reply-To: users@global.libreoffice.org Subject: Re: [libreoffice-users] Re: Problem with Linux open nouveau video driver I was not aware of Leigh's advice until I saw your response here. So I found and followed his advice, and, I still see issues. Note that I do still see the driver, however rpm -qa | grep -i nouveau xorg-x11-drv-nouveau-0.0.16-27.20110720gitb806e3f.fc16.x86_64 Then again, I also see all sorts of kmod stuff rpm -qa | grep -i nvidia xorg-x11-drv-nvidia-libs-290.10-1.fc16.x86_64 kmod-nvidia-3.1.2-1.fc16.x86_64-290.10-1.fc16.1.x86_64 nvidia-settings-1.0-13.fc16.x86_64 akmod-nvidia-290.10-1.fc16.1.x86_64 xorg-x11-drv-nvidia-290.10-1.fc16.x86_64 nvidia-xconfig-1.0-11.fc16.x86_64 kmod-nvidia-3.1.1-1.fc16.x86_64-290.06-1.fc16.2.x86_64 kmod-nvidia-3.1.1-2.fc16.x86_64-290.06-1.fc16.3.x86_64 On 12/02/2011 03:18 AM, Onyeibo Oku wrote: If you're running kmod nvidia drivers then you are not running nouveau. Nouveau runs out-of-the-box (fresh installation) and has proven to be more headache-free. I have not noticed this issue. Could this be peculiar to a file? Can you describe steps to replicate it without transferring a sample file? I am presently running nouveau with LO without issues on F16 but I probably haven't gone your route. My experience with kmod-nvidia and the sister akmod-nvidia is that they conflict with nouveau especially if nouveau is not silenced. Did U follow leigh's instructions at forums.fedoraforum.org? - from twohot@device.mobile :) -Original Message- From: Jay Lozierjsloz...@gmail.com Date: Fri, 02 Dec 2011 01:11:58 To:users@global.libreoffice.org Reply-To: users@global.libreoffice.org Subject: Re: [libreoffice-users] Re: Problem with Linux open nouveau video driver On 12/01/2011 10:16 PM, Andrew Douglas Pitonyak wrote: On 12/01/2011 10:05 PM, NoOp wrote: On 11/30/2011 05:04 PM, Jonathan Schultz wrote: Hello, For some time I've found that libreoffice (and openoffice before it) had trouble rendering text with the Linux open 'nouveau' (as opposed to the proprietary NVIDIA) driver. What appears to happen is that everything above a certain point is good, but below it the text simply doesn't appear. I've not seen any other application that has the same problem. I've attached a typical screenshot to demonstrate the effect. It always helps if you: 1) tell others what version of LO you are having issues with (and also if it is from LO or some other source; linux distribution repository or PPA, etc), 2) what OS type and version (there are about thousands of versions of linux). My /guess/ is that you are running some form of Ubuntu, if correct please tell us which version you are running. Cannot comment on this poster, but, I have seen a very similar issue on both OOo and LO. I see this on Linux, not on Windows. I had the problem with Fedora 15 and also Fedora 16. Both are 64-bit versions. I use the KMod drivers for NVidia installed from the repositories. I see the issues with other applications as well, but the primary offenders are OOo and QT. Using Ubuntu 11.04 and 11.10 base and derivatives (Pinguy and Mint), both 64 bit, I have not seen this behavior. AFAIK the drivers were/are ATI Radeon from the repository. The actual drivers were auto-installed on installation and left unchanged. The desktops include both Gnome 2.? and Gnome 3.2. It appears that the problem is limited to the NVidia drivers. -- Andrew Pitonyak My Macro Document: http://www.pitonyak.org/AndrewMacro.odt Info: http://www.pitonyak.org/oo.php -- For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to: users+h...@global.libreoffice.org Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted -- For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to: users+h...@global.libreoffice.org Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
