[libreoffice-users] UNO XTextTable.getCellNames() ordering
Hello, This is a follow-up question to the forum thread: https://forum.openoffice.org/en/forum/viewtopic.php?f=20=87294=409289#p409289 I am trying to find a definite answer to the ordering returned by getCellNames(): https://www.openoffice.org/api/docs/common/ref/com/sun/star/text/XTextTable.html#getCellNames Is there any order in the returned sequence, or is no order guaranteed? I noted that the sequence seems to contain the table’s cell names in left-to-right (cols) and top-to-bottom (rows) order, but that may be accidental. Thanks, Jens -- Jens Tröger http://savage.light-speed.de/ -- To unsubscribe e-mail to: users+unsubscr...@global.libreoffice.org Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
[libreoffice-users] Re: Starting libreoffice 5.1.4.2 in listening mode
On 02/03/2017 11:26 AM, anne-ology wrote: Just 'searched' for 'listening modes' & 'listening modes in LO'; under the first, there are numerous manuals, etc. - under the second, nil. Hoping this helps you locate that for which you're searching, Once I changed LO to libreoffice I got some hits. Most of them I had seen already but there was a couple of new ones and one of them actually worked. Thanks, Jim From: JimDate: Thu, Feb 2, 2017 at 8:02 PM Subject: [libreoffice-users] Starting libreoffice 5.1.4.2 in listening mode To: users@global.libreoffice.org I have been trying to start LO in listening mode so I can connect to it with a external Python macro. I've tried various 'helloworld' examples and I get errors with all of them. Such as: __main__.NoConnectException: Connector : couldn't connect to socket (Success) _main__.DisposedException: Binary URP bridge disposed during call Googling hasn't been any help. Could someone please show me a short example of how to do this? Thanks, Jim -- To unsubscribe e-mail to: users+unsubscr...@global.libreoffice.org Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
Re: [libreoffice-users] LibreOffice Help in version 5.3.0.3
Did you install the separate help package for 5.3.0.3? http://www.libreoffice.org/download/download/?type=deb-x86_64=5.3.0=pick On Sat, Feb 4, 2017 at 12:47 PM, M Henri Daywrote: > After upgrading recently to (the Swedish version of) LibreOffice 5.3.0.3, > I find that I can no longer access LibreOffice Help - clicking on the > Help-button and then LibreOffice Help (F1) instead opens a new browser > window. This in contrast to the situation in LibreOffice 5.2.4.2, in which > the same procedure opens, as expected, to the help pages > > A bug ? Has anyone else experienced this ?... > > Henri > > -- > To unsubscribe e-mail to: users+unsubscr...@global.libreoffice.org > Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to- > unsubscribe/ > Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette > List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/ > All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be > deleted > -- To unsubscribe e-mail to: users+unsubscr...@global.libreoffice.org Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
[libreoffice-users] LibreOffice Help in version 5.3.0.3
After upgrading recently to (the Swedish version of) LibreOffice 5.3.0.3, I find that I can no longer access LibreOffice Help - clicking on the Help-button and then LibreOffice Help (F1) instead opens a new browser window. This in contrast to the situation in LibreOffice 5.2.4.2, in which the same procedure opens, as expected, to the help pages A bug ? Has anyone else experienced this ?... Henri -- To unsubscribe e-mail to: users+unsubscr...@global.libreoffice.org Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
Re: [libreoffice-users] Zoom control in the 5.3 status bar
2017-02-03 3:25 GMT+01:00 MR ZenWiz: > This seems to be missing, or maybe I clicke don something that made it > go away, but I can't find anything to help turn it back on. > > Is this a new "feature?" The help command does not seem to show it > being absent, but I don't see it any more. > > Thanks. > > MR The zoom button can be enabled by following the procedure outlined here : https://help.libreoffice.org/Common/Adding_Buttons_to_Toolbars Henri -- To unsubscribe e-mail to: users+unsubscr...@global.libreoffice.org Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
Re: [libreoffice-users] LO 5.3 glitches
Having spent a lifetime in problem handling and feature request I do not agree with Tom. Here's my take- Bugs: - Anything that used to work and doesn't anymore is a bug (introduced by an update). Of course set aside features which are announced to be obsolete. - Anything not working which is supposed to work according requirements and/or documentation - Anything that causes LO to crash Feature requests: - Anything that is not in requirements and/or documentation - Anything users can't reasonably expect to work, but is desirable As such, bugs need to be solved (since they shouldn't be there in the first place :-)). Feature requests on the other hand is, once approved, new work in the pipeline, and we have to see when and if developers get time for it. Rob. On 4 feb. 2017, at 16:37, M Henri Day wrote: > 2017-02-03 20:13 GMT+01:00 James E. Lang: > >> That's an interesting point of view Tom. >> >> In my opinion any unannounced regression is a proper subject for a bug >> report and a new capability is the subject for a feature request. But, I'm >> not a developer. >> >> It would be nice if ordinary dictionary definitions applied to the words >> used! >> >> -- >> Jim >> >> -Original Message- >> From: Tom Davies >> To: "users@global.libreoffice.org" >> Sent: Fri, 03 Feb 2017 7:44 >> Subject: Re: [libreoffice-users] LO 5.3 glitches >> >> Hi :) >> Right now is a good time to post bug-reports and "feature requests". >> >> "Feature requests" are what most 'normal' (ie non-devs) of us think of as >> bugs. It includes features that used to work but now don't and features >> that don't quite work at all. >> >> "Bug reports" are only things that cause the program or entire system to >> crash (or that escalate privileges to super-users/ super-user/ >> administrator - but as normal users we probably wouldn't notice such >> escalation). In chatting with each other we often call things "bugs" or >> say a thing is "buggy" but if it doesn't crash the system or cause it to >> close unexpectedly, then it doesn't fit the developers notion of "bug", so >> there is no point posting a bug-report about it - instead post as a >> feature-request. >> >> Similarly with the term "stable". However badly a thing behaves, such as >> familiar functionality suddenly not working, then the devs don't think of >> that as showing the program is unstable. A program is only unstable if it >> crashes (or maybe that escalation thing) or if it crashes the whole >> system. LibreOffice is particularly unlikely to do either of those things >> - there is a measurement of that sort of stability and LibreOffice scores >> extraordinarily highly, far above much more respected or well-known >> software. >> >> It is nice to hear about good issues with new the branch of LibreOffice >> as it allows us to be better prepared for the questions that 'normal' users >> are likely to ask on this mailing list. However reporting an issue to this >> mailing list is extremely unlikely to result in the issue being (what we >> would probably refer to as being) fixed. >> >> >> Right now is probably the best time for doing proper bug-reports and >> feature-requests because it's the time when the greatest percentage of devs >> are focused on this branch and most interested in it's outcomes. >> >> Regards from >> Tom :) >> > > The usage with which I am familiar corresponds to that mentioned by James > above ; i e, > «any unannounced regression is a proper subject for a bug report and a new > capability is the subject for a feature request» > > > Henri > > -- > To unsubscribe e-mail to: users+unsubscr...@global.libreoffice.org > Problems? > http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ > Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette > List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/ > All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted -- To unsubscribe e-mail to: users+unsubscr...@global.libreoffice.org Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
Re: [libreoffice-users] LO 5.3 glitches
2017-02-03 20:13 GMT+01:00 James E. Lang: > That's an interesting point of view Tom. > > In my opinion any unannounced regression is a proper subject for a bug > report and a new capability is the subject for a feature request. But, I'm > not a developer. > > It would be nice if ordinary dictionary definitions applied to the words > used! > > -- > Jim > > -Original Message- > From: Tom Davies > To: "users@global.libreoffice.org" > Sent: Fri, 03 Feb 2017 7:44 > Subject: Re: [libreoffice-users] LO 5.3 glitches > > Hi :) > Right now is a good time to post bug-reports and "feature requests". > > "Feature requests" are what most 'normal' (ie non-devs) of us think of as > bugs. It includes features that used to work but now don't and features > that don't quite work at all. > > "Bug reports" are only things that cause the program or entire system to > crash (or that escalate privileges to super-users/ super-user/ > administrator - but as normal users we probably wouldn't notice such > escalation). In chatting with each other we often call things "bugs" or > say a thing is "buggy" but if it doesn't crash the system or cause it to > close unexpectedly, then it doesn't fit the developers notion of "bug", so > there is no point posting a bug-report about it - instead post as a > feature-request. > > Similarly with the term "stable". However badly a thing behaves, such as > familiar functionality suddenly not working, then the devs don't think of > that as showing the program is unstable. A program is only unstable if it > crashes (or maybe that escalation thing) or if it crashes the whole > system. LibreOffice is particularly unlikely to do either of those things > - there is a measurement of that sort of stability and LibreOffice scores > extraordinarily highly, far above much more respected or well-known > software. > > It is nice to hear about good issues with new the branch of LibreOffice > as it allows us to be better prepared for the questions that 'normal' users > are likely to ask on this mailing list. However reporting an issue to this > mailing list is extremely unlikely to result in the issue being (what we > would probably refer to as being) fixed. > > > Right now is probably the best time for doing proper bug-reports and > feature-requests because it's the time when the greatest percentage of devs > are focused on this branch and most interested in it's outcomes. > > Regards from > Tom :) > The usage with which I am familiar corresponds to that mentioned by James above ; i e, «any unannounced regression is a proper subject for a bug report and a new capability is the subject for a feature request» Henri -- To unsubscribe e-mail to: users+unsubscr...@global.libreoffice.org Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted