Re: [libreoffice-users] Win64: Scribus too... :-)

2012-11-04 Thread Tom Davies
Hi :)  

Are Cpu cycles to do with multi-core/multi-cpu?  If so it's presumably possible 
for 32bit apps to take advantage.  I think it's just a fluke that most of us 
think that 64bit machines tend to have more than 1 cpu/core and 32bit ones 
don't.  Both technologies became well known around the same time.  


Apparently the 4Gb Ram limit is a limit of the OS, not the apps.  If the OS can 
read/write to more ram then i don't think the apps would be restricted.  
Apparently OSes that are 32bit could read more Ram with a different kernel 
module.  With GnuLinux it's possible to swap-in the different module and i 
kept being  told that it's really easy.  Something like the pae-something 
module.  


Ram is used more efficiently by OpenSource programs, especially when using 
quite a few at the same time.  My whole system is OpenSource apart from a few 
fonts and a couple of codecs and i seldom need even 1Gb.  Movies and even 
fairly hefty games seem quite happy.  I figure that if bits of my ram detiorate 
over time then i could always swap the sticks around to use the ones that 
aren't getting used at the moment.  

If it feels like LO/OO are bumping into ram issues then it's more likely to be 
the limits you set (or the default ones) in

Tools - Options - Memory


If you imagine wires or cables as lanes on a motorway then double the number of 
lanes can carry double the number of cars.  It's just that you don't always 
need to have that many cars on a section of motorway.  
Regards from

Tom :)  







 From: Mas tier3supp...@gmail.com
To: 
Cc: users@global.libreoffice.org users@global.libreoffice.org 
Sent: Sunday, 4 November 2012, 5:03
Subject: Re: [libreoffice-users] Win64: Scribus too... :-)
 
On Sat, Nov 3, 2012 at 6:24 PM, Jay Lozier jsloz...@gmail.com wrote:

 On 11/03/2012 05:14 PM, VA wrote:

 Okay, I'll betray my ignorance. What would be the difference or advantage
 of running a 64 bit LibO vs. a 32 bit LibO?

 Virgil

 IMHO, the practical difference is nil for a typical office use. Some large
 databases will require 64 bit because 32 bit is limited to 4 GB.


 -Original Message- From: James Knott
 Sent: Saturday, November 03, 2012 4:53 PM
 To: LibreOffice
 Subject: Re: [libreoffice-users] Win64: Scribus too... :-)

 rost52 wrote:

 How many LibO user are having wn64 machines? Or better what is the
 percentage of win64 users in the LibO community?


 I'm a Linux user, 64 bits of course, but I have one, 1, count 'em, one
 computer that has 64 bit Windows 7 on it.  Then again, there have been
 64 bit versions of Linux going back 17 - 18 years and I was running 64
 bit Linux for over 5 years, before I had 64 bit Windows.



 --
 Jay Lozier
 jsloz...@gmail.com





Since Libreoffice is a Office product . I don't believe you will see a big
differential in performance as a user . From a programmer view , you can
take advantage of the cpu cycles and memory usage with a 64bit system.

-- 
--
Masekela Walls
Web Security Analyst | Senior Server Administrator
Powserve.com / Gemini ISP Networks


-- 
For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to: users+h...@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted



Re: [libreoffice-users] Win64: Scribus too... :-)

2012-11-04 Thread Mas
On Sun, Nov 4, 2012 at 5:25 AM, Tom Davies tomdavie...@yahoo.co.uk wrote:

 Hi :)
 Are Cpu cycles to do with multi-core/multi-cpu?  If so it's presumably
 possible for 32bit apps to take advantage.  I think it's just a fluke that
 most of us think that 64bit machines tend to have more than 1 cpu/core and
 32bit ones don't.  Both technologies became well known around the same
 time.

 Apparently the 4Gb Ram limit is a limit of the OS, not the apps.  If the
 OS can read/write to more ram then i don't think the apps would be
 restricted.  Apparently OSes that are 32bit could read more Ram with a
 different kernel module.  With GnuLinux it's possible to swap-in the
 different module and i kept being told that it's really easy.  Something
 like the pae-something module.

 Ram is used more efficiently by OpenSource programs, especially when using
 quite a few at the same time.  My whole system is OpenSource apart from a
 few fonts and a couple of codecs and i seldom need even 1Gb.  Movies and
 even fairly hefty games seem quite happy.  I figure that if bits of my ram
 detiorate over time then i could always swap the sticks around to use the
 ones that aren't getting used at the moment.

 If it feels like LO/OO are bumping into ram issues then it's more likely
 to be the limits you set (or the default ones) in

 Tools - Options - Memory


 If you imagine wires or cables as lanes on a motorway then double the
 number of lanes can carry double the number of cars.  It's just that you
 don't always need to have that many cars on a section of motorway.
 Regards from
 Tom :)


CPU Cycles is the process the processor takes to complete a command.
Multiple cores came about due to the current CPU overheating above 4GHZ .
So they started adding more cores to the existing processors to give you
more cpu threads to process commands. So in theory you can have a 3GHZ CPU
with dual cores (2 central processing units) to get the result of a 6ghz
processor.

You are correct, the 4GB limit was imposed by the operating system . 64bit
has been around for years, I believe someone else mention this on the
thread, its not new and unix/linux has been using it.


If you imagine wires or cables as lanes on a motorway then double the
number of lanes can carry double the number of cars.  It's just that you
don't always need to have that many cars on a section of motorway.  

I like that ,
-- 
--
Masekela Walls
Web Security Analyst | Senior Server Administrator
Powserve.com / Gemini ISP Networks

-- 
For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to: users+h...@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted



Re: [libreoffice-users] Win64: Scribus too... :-)

2012-11-04 Thread James Knott

Tom Davies wrote:

Apparently the 4Gb Ram limit is a limit of the OS, not the apps.  If the OS can read/write to 
more ram then i don't think the apps would be restricted.  Apparently OSes that are 32bit 
could read more Ram with a different kernel module.  With GnuLinux it's possible to 
swap-in the different module and i kept being  told that it's really easy.  
Something like the pae-something module.
With PAE, the 32 bit CPU can access more that 4 GB, but Microsoft still 
limits Windows to 4 GB.  With Linux, no there is no such artificial 
limitation.  IIRC, applications are still limited to 4 GB, as they don't 
know how to access more, but the OS can use the greater space and make 
it available to the apps.  With Linux, recently used stuff is retained 
in memory, so that accessing it again is quick.  It will eventually be 
moved to swap, if not recently used.  So, with Linux, the more memory 
available, including beyond 4 GB, the faster the system in general runs.



https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Physical_Address_Extension

--
For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to: users+h...@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted



Re: [libreoffice-users] Win64: Scribus too... :-)

2012-11-04 Thread James Knott

Mas wrote:

I believe someone else mention this on the
thread, its not new and unix/linux has been using it.


Yes, there was a 64 bit version of Linux running on the DEC Alpha, 
followed shortly by the IBM PowerPC around 1994 - 1995.


--
For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to: users+h...@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted



Re: [libreoffice-users] Win64: Scribus too... :-)

2012-11-04 Thread Joep L. Blom

On 04-11-12 13:21, James Knott wrote:

Mas wrote:

I believe someone else mention this on the
thread, its not new and unix/linux has been using it.


Yes, there was a 64 bit version of Linux running on the DEC Alpha,
followed shortly by the IBM PowerPC around 1994 - 1995.

The 64-bit R4000 by MIPS technologies came out in 1992 and was first 
used in Silicon Graphics machines, running IRIX the SGI flavour of UNIX. 
This processor was 64-bit internally but 32-bit externally so only a 
32-bit wide memory-path could be used.Later versions, notably the R8000 
(1994) and the R1000 (1996) were 64-bit internally and externally. In 
1994 SGI licensed the memory architecture, developed by Cray (which it 
bought a few years later) and licensed it, I thought in  2002 to AMD for 
its 64-bit processors. This NUMA architecture is much faster than the 
standard architecture used in other processors and is much more suitable 
for multiprocessor systems.

Joep


--
For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to: users+h...@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted



Re: [libreoffice-users] Win64: Scribus too... :-)

2012-11-03 Thread Mas
On Sat, Nov 3, 2012 at 12:41 AM, rost52 bugquestcon...@online.de wrote:

  May I ask why our devs should work on a win64 version while we are having
 still a few bugs in the 3.6 branch (and also in 3.5.7).

 How many LibO user are having wn64 machines? Or better what is the
 percentage of win64 users in the LibO community?



 On 2012-11-02 20:52, Carlo Strata wrote:

 Dear Everyone,

 are we working forward to LibreOffice-win64?

 Taking a look if there were new Scribus releases I give a look to next
 branch svn 1.4.2
 http://sourceforge.net/**projects/scribus/files/**scribus-svn/1.4.2svn/http://sourceforge.net/projects/scribus/files/scribus-svn/1.4.2svn/

 and I see that... there are an x64 windows build (!!!) that I suppose it
 use the Win64 GhostScript build too
 http://www.ghostscript.com/**download/http://www.ghostscript.com/download/

 Any new in this walk?

 Have a sunny day,

 Carlo




Most of the system on the market are 64bit . since 32bit can run in a
64bit environment I dont see the rush to change the application code to run
under 64bit. keep in mind i am not saying Libreoffice should not or will
not.


there is a high amount of user running Libreoffice under Windows.
-- 
--
Masekela Walls
Web Security Analyst | Senior Server Administrator
Powserve.com / Gemini ISP Networks

-- 
For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to: users+h...@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted



Re: [libreoffice-users] Win64: Scribus too... :-)

2012-11-03 Thread James Knott

rost52 wrote:
How many LibO user are having wn64 machines? Or better what is the 
percentage of win64 users in the LibO community?


I'm a Linux user, 64 bits of course, but I have one, 1, count 'em, one 
computer that has 64 bit Windows 7 on it.  Then again, there have been 
64 bit versions of Linux going back 17 - 18 years and I was running 64 
bit Linux for over 5 years, before I had 64 bit Windows.


--
For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to: users+h...@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted



Re: [libreoffice-users] Win64: Scribus too... :-)

2012-11-03 Thread VA
Okay, I'll betray my ignorance. What would be the difference or advantage of 
running a 64 bit LibO vs. a 32 bit LibO?


Virgil

-Original Message- 
From: James Knott

Sent: Saturday, November 03, 2012 4:53 PM
To: LibreOffice
Subject: Re: [libreoffice-users] Win64: Scribus too... :-)

rost52 wrote:
How many LibO user are having wn64 machines? Or better what is the 
percentage of win64 users in the LibO community?


I'm a Linux user, 64 bits of course, but I have one, 1, count 'em, one
computer that has 64 bit Windows 7 on it.  Then again, there have been
64 bit versions of Linux going back 17 - 18 years and I was running 64
bit Linux for over 5 years, before I had 64 bit Windows.

--
For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to: users+h...@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? 
http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/

Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be 
deleted



--
For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to: users+h...@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted



Re: [libreoffice-users] Win64: Scribus too... :-)

2012-11-03 Thread Jay Lozier

On 11/03/2012 05:14 PM, VA wrote:
Okay, I'll betray my ignorance. What would be the difference or 
advantage of running a 64 bit LibO vs. a 32 bit LibO?


Virgil
IMHO, the practical difference is nil for a typical office use. Some 
large databases will require 64 bit because 32 bit is limited to 4 GB.


-Original Message- From: James Knott
Sent: Saturday, November 03, 2012 4:53 PM
To: LibreOffice
Subject: Re: [libreoffice-users] Win64: Scribus too... :-)

rost52 wrote:
How many LibO user are having wn64 machines? Or better what is the 
percentage of win64 users in the LibO community?


I'm a Linux user, 64 bits of course, but I have one, 1, count 'em, one
computer that has 64 bit Windows 7 on it.  Then again, there have been
64 bit versions of Linux going back 17 - 18 years and I was running 64
bit Linux for over 5 years, before I had 64 bit Windows.




--
Jay Lozier
jsloz...@gmail.com


--
For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to: users+h...@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted



Re: [libreoffice-users] Win64: Scribus too... :-)

2012-11-03 Thread Mas
On Sat, Nov 3, 2012 at 6:24 PM, Jay Lozier jsloz...@gmail.com wrote:

 On 11/03/2012 05:14 PM, VA wrote:

 Okay, I'll betray my ignorance. What would be the difference or advantage
 of running a 64 bit LibO vs. a 32 bit LibO?

 Virgil

 IMHO, the practical difference is nil for a typical office use. Some large
 databases will require 64 bit because 32 bit is limited to 4 GB.


 -Original Message- From: James Knott
 Sent: Saturday, November 03, 2012 4:53 PM
 To: LibreOffice
 Subject: Re: [libreoffice-users] Win64: Scribus too... :-)

 rost52 wrote:

 How many LibO user are having wn64 machines? Or better what is the
 percentage of win64 users in the LibO community?


 I'm a Linux user, 64 bits of course, but I have one, 1, count 'em, one
 computer that has 64 bit Windows 7 on it.  Then again, there have been
 64 bit versions of Linux going back 17 - 18 years and I was running 64
 bit Linux for over 5 years, before I had 64 bit Windows.



 --
 Jay Lozier
 jsloz...@gmail.com



 --
 For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to: users+help@global.libreoffice.**
 org users%2bh...@global.libreoffice.org
 Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/**get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-**
 unsubscribe/http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
 Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.**documentfoundation.org/**
 Netiquette http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
 List archive: 
 http://listarchives.**libreoffice.org/global/users/http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/
 All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be
 deleted


Since Libreoffice is a Office product . I don't believe you will see a big
differential in performance as a user . From a programmer view , you can
take advantage of the cpu cycles and memory usage with a 64bit system.

-- 
--
Masekela Walls
Web Security Analyst | Senior Server Administrator
Powserve.com / Gemini ISP Networks

-- 
For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to: users+h...@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted