Re: CGIs gehen nicht mehr
On Tue, 9 Aug 2005, Sven Löschner wrote: Ich habe einen Linux 9.0 Server, der bisher mit einem Apache 2.0.48 mit Was ist Linux 9.0? Confixx (ist in diesem Falle zumindest zu erwähnen) lief. Auf jeden Fall hatte ich kein Problem mit irgendwelchen CGIs. Jetzt habe ich einen neuen Server (2.0.54) aufgesetzt. Ich lade u.A. auch mod_cgi und susexec. Aber ich bekomme bei sämtlichen CGIs die Fehlermeldung Serverfehler, Error 500, Premature end of script headers: hello.cgi . [...] Hat noch jemand einen Tipp? Logfiles lesen. -- Apache HTTP Server Mailing List users-de unsubscribe-Anfragen an [EMAIL PROTECTED] sonstige Anfragen an [EMAIL PROTECTED] --
RE: CGIs gehen nicht mehr
Logfiles lesen. Ok, womit wir bei dem nächsten Problem wären, wie ich gerade sehe: meine logfile suexec.log ist nicht vorhanden...also wenn ich suexec2 -V aufrufe, steht da: -D AP_DOC_ROOT=/srv/www/htdocs -D AP_GID_MIN=96 -D AP_HTTPD_USER=wwwrun -D AP_LOG_EXEC=/var/log/apache2/suexec.log -D AP_SAFE_PATH=/usr/local/bin:/usr/bin:/bin -D AP_UID_MIN=96 -D AP_USERDIR_SUFFIX=public_html Die Log-Datei ist aber nicht vorhanden Die Apache-Log meldet aber, das Suexec erfolgreich gestartet wurde. -- Apache HTTP Server Mailing List users-de unsubscribe-Anfragen an [EMAIL PROTECTED] sonstige Anfragen an [EMAIL PROTECTED] --
Re: Sprungmarken in der httpd.conf?
am dienstag, 9. august 2005, morgens um 9:49 uhr hast du geschrieben: Hast du evtl. schon mal nach anderen Programmen geschaut, die eventuell auf den Proxy-Einsatz spezialisiert sind (z.B. Squid) oder muss es unbedingt Apache sein? (nur aus Interesse) Hallo Paul, das freut mich jetzt, dass doch noch jemand auf meine unqualifizierte Frage antwortet. Apache scheint für uns nach umfangreicher Recherche die einzige Lösung zu sein (zumindest ohne unverhältnismässigen Aufwand). Wir haben uns bereits mit diversen Proxy-Tools beschäftigt, insbesondere mit Squid. Aus verschiedenen Gründen sind wir schliesslich bei Apache gelandet. Bevor ich mich eingehend mit Apache beschäftige und damit beginne, die Bücher durchzuackern, wollte ich erst rausfinden, ob unser Vorhaben mit Apache überhaupt realisierbar ist. Aus diesem Grund muten meine Fragen wohl auch etwas komisch oder zumindest unbeholfen an... Bis jetzt sehe ich leider immer noch keine Lösung, wie ich anhand eines Variablenwertes in der Apache-Config gewisse Filter und Umleitungen ausführen lassen kann. Ich habe zwar rausgefunden, dass ich bei mod_rewrite- und mod_ext_filter-Regeln angeben kann, dass diese jeweils nur gelanden werden, wenn eine bestimmte Umgebungsvariable _vorhanden_ ist. Allerdings konnte ich nicht rausfinden, ob die Regeln auch über einen bestimmten _Wert_ einer Variable ausgelöst werden können. So das z.B. eine Umleitung nur aktiv ist, wenn der Wert einer Variable der Zahl 023 entspricht. Zudem muss ich noch rausfinden, wie ein Perl-Script gleich zu Beginn einer Anfage ausgewertet werden kann. Sonst fehlt mir später bei meinen Regeln der Wert der erwähnten Variable, die mit Hilfe eines Cookies und einer DB gewonnen wird. bitte produziere kein ToFu (Textoben, Fullquote unten), danke. Wird in Zukunft hoffentlich nicht mehr passieren. -- Gruss Bernhard -- Apache HTTP Server Mailing List users-de unsubscribe-Anfragen an [EMAIL PROTECTED] sonstige Anfragen an [EMAIL PROTECTED] --
Re: Re: Sprungmarken in der httpd.conf?
Hallo Bernhard, Astrid (Kess) hat den entscheidenden Hinweis gegeben: Du brauchst keine Sprungmarken, du musst entsprechende Container definieren. Allerdings schreibst Du in Deiner Antwort, dass Du 100 verschiedene Profile hast und dass Du eine Variable hast, anhand deren Wert Du jeweils andere Umleitungs- und Filterregeln aktivieren möchtest. Anders formuliert hast Du also eine Url, die an einer bestimmten Stelle den Wert Deiner Variablen beinhaltet. Beispiel: http://reimann-systemberatung.de/contact/contact_de.html?userid=1 Hier hätte die Variable userid den Wert 1. Um nun anhand des Wertes verschiedene Einstellungen vorzunehmen, kann Dir mod_rewrite (in Deinem Fall im Zusammenspiel mit mod_proxy) helfen. mod_rewrite erlaubt es, mit Hilfe von regulären Ausdrücken die URL zu untersuchen und den Wert der Variablen zu extrahieren. Anschließend kannst Du innerhalb einer RewriteRule mit Hilfe der Option [P] mod_proxy ansprechen. Für solche einfachen Sachen wie im og. Beispiel reicht eine einzige RewriteRule, unabhängig davon, ob Du 100 oder 1000 Profile hast. Beispiele dazu findest Du unter http://httpd.apache.org/docs/2.0/mod/mod_rewrite.html und unter http://httpd.apache.org/docs/2.0/misc/rewriteguide.html Gruß Marcus Reimann M. Reimann Systemberatung http://www.reimann-systemberatung.de -- Apache HTTP Server Mailing List users-de unsubscribe-Anfragen an [EMAIL PROTECTED] sonstige Anfragen an [EMAIL PROTECTED] --
RE: CGIs gehen nicht mehr
Hallo, Ok, womit wir bei dem nächsten Problem wären, wie ich gerade sehe: meine logfile suexec.log ist nicht vorhanden...also wenn ich suexec2 -V aufrufe, steht da: Check mal ob die suexec2 auch die richtigen Rechte besitzt: chmod 4755 /usr/lib/apache2/suexec2 Bei z.Bsp. debian nach einem apt-get install apache2 löscht er die rechte immer, daher würde ich das mal checken, kann ja sein das es daran leigt. Mit freundlichen Grüssen Thomas Goik http://www.echtwahr.de http://www.echtwahr.com -- Apache HTTP Server Mailing List users-de unsubscribe-Anfragen an [EMAIL PROTECTED] sonstige Anfragen an [EMAIL PROTECTED] --
Re: Sprungmarken in der httpd.conf?
am dienstag, 9. august 2005, abends um 8:34 uhr hast du geschrieben:
Anders formuliert hast Du also eine Url, die an einer bestimmten
Stelle den Wert Deiner Variablen beinhaltet.
Beispiel:
http://reimann-systemberatung.de/contact/contact_de.html?userid=1
Hier hätte die Variable userid den Wert 1.
Um nun anhand des Wertes verschiedene Einstellungen vorzunehmen,
kann Dir mod_rewrite (in Deinem Fall im Zusammenspiel mit
mod_proxy) helfen.
Dieser Lösungsansatz klingt vielversprechend. Daran habe ich ehrlich
gesagt noch gar nicht gedacht.
Das würde allerdings voraussetzen, dass ich die URI von der Datei,
welche vom Proxy-User angefordert wird, gleich zu Beginn von einem
Perl-Script um den String mit der Variable (?userid=1) ergänze.
Kann ich irgendwie erreichen, dass dieses Script gleich ganz zu Beginn
ausgeführt wird?
Zumindest die Umleitungen und Bildmanipulationen (im Zusammenhang mit
Apache::ImageMagick) würden so sicherlich klappen.
So das z.B.
eine Umleitung nur aktiv ist, wenn der Wert einer Variable der Zahl
023 entspricht.
Beispiel für mod_rewrite:
RewriteCond %{ENV:variable} 023
vgl. dazu
http://httpd.apache.org/docs/2.0/mod/mod_rewrite.html#rewritecond
Juhuu! Das wird ja immer besser. Genau diese Bedingung würde mein
Problem ja lösen. Vielen herzlichen Dank fürs Nachschlagen. Werde mir
gleich die Seite ausdrucken und gründlich studieren.
Den Cookie könnte mod_rewrite ebenfalls mit RewriteCond %{HTTP_COOKIE}
auslesen, aber ich glaube, Du bist mit den Cookies auf dem Holzweg.
Dein Browser wird sicherlich Cookies mit den Webservern austauschen,
die Du besuchst, aber wieso sollte Dein Browser einen Cookie an
einen dazwischengeschalteten Browser-Proxy (und dafür möchtest Du
den Apache ja gerne missbrauchen) senden?
Also das Cookie wird dem User per PHP nach dem einloggen zugesteckt.
Ein Perl-Script (mod_perl) schaut nur welche id darin ist und schaut
in einer MySQL-DB, welches Level der Proxy-User hat. Dieses Userlevel
wird dann als Variable gesetzt.
%{HTTP_COOKIE} würde sich also nicht eignen, weil die nötige Variable
noch nicht im Cookie steht.
Wenn ich das Perl-Script zum auslesen des Cookies hinbringe und das
gleich zu Beginn (noch vor den mod_rewrite-Anweisungen) ausführen
lassen könnte, würde von mir aus gesehen also alles klappen :)
FÜr das, was Ihr in Eurer Projektarbeit umsetzen wollt, würde ich
Euch generell eher empfehlen, einen kleinen Proxy-Server mit der
Programmiersprache Eurer Wahl selbst zu schreiben. Für Perl gibt es
einige Tutorials, die erläutern, wie man einen HTTP-Proxy baut.
Danke. Werde die Tutorials morgen mal gründlich studieren. Ich denke
aber trotzdem, dass es einfacher wäre, den Apache und seine
Filter-Module zu missbrauchen ;)
--
Einen schönen Gruss
Bernhard
--
Apache HTTP Server Mailing List users-de
unsubscribe-Anfragen an [EMAIL PROTECTED]
sonstige Anfragen an [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] httpd file config
Hello again, I am trying to get all of the bugs out of my install. I found that I was still using php4 instead of php5 and wanted to change that.I madesureI had the correct php.ini installed in C:\Windows and i got a message saying thatthere were two different module complieings. So I went snooping around in my httpd.conf file and found that I was still trying to use the old dll's so Ireplaced these lines; LoadModule php4_module C:\php\php4apache2.dllAddType application/x-httpd-php .php4 .php .htm .php3 .inc .fireAddType application/x-httpd-php-source .phps with these lines; LoadModule php5_module C:\PHP1\php5apache2.dllAddType application/x-httpd-php .php4 .php .htm .php3 .inc .fireAddType application/x-httpd-php-source .phpsPHPIniDir C:/PHP They are two totlay seperate php folders. I took everything to do with php4 and put it all in the php4 folder so no files are in any system path. I am running on windows XP.
Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] mod_rewrite vs Content Management Systems
--- Brian Candler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Not exactly - I'm suggesting doing this with mod_rewrite but with an external rewriting program. Something like this (untested):snip Thanks for all the tips. I'm just on the verge of learning how to make my basic CMS script, so I hope to tackle this in the next few weeks. Start your day with Yahoo! - make it your home page http://www.yahoo.com/r/hs - The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project. See URL:http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html for more info. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] from the digest: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unable to Upload files through my application
Nope, not stupid problem. You will never know it might help others ;)On 8/9/05, Mohit Kumar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:The access rights on the folder were not correct. Hance it was not able to upload the file. Sorry for taking up so much time on the forum for a stupid problem. On 8/8/05, Scott Hamm [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Pray tell what was the solution? On 8/8/05, Mohit Kumar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Thanks guys I got it up and running finally. On 8/5/05, Joshua Slive [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 8/5/05, Mohit Kumar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:[Thu Aug 04 22:44:53 2005] [error] [client 127.0.0.1] Unable to PUT new contents for /mohit/howlinuxworks_ch3.pdf.[403, #0] [Thu Aug 04 22:44:53 2005] [error] [client 127.0.0.1 ] (13)Permission denied: An error occurred while opening a resource.[500, #0]Does the User/Group specified in httpd.conf have write access to therelevant file/directory? Joshua.- The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project.See URL: http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html for more info.To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] from the digest: [EMAIL PROTECTED]For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Please avoid sending me Word or PowerPoint attachments.See http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/no-word-attachments.html -- Please avoid sending me Word or PowerPoint attachments.See http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/no-word-attachments.html
Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Problem with logrotate causing segfaults with apache
On 8/8/05, Rheault_Rob [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I am using Apache 1.3.27 and logrotate 2.6. I have noticed recently that core files are being generated roughly at the same time that my logrotate cron job runs to rotate my apache log files. Has anyone else experienced this problem and if so what did you do to resolve it. Load the core dumps in a debugger to see what the cause is. Joshua. - The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project. See URL:http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html for more info. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] from the digest: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Environment Variable contamination between vhosts - 1.3.33
On 8/8/05, Marc Powell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Well... no luck there. PHP's Rasmus Lerdorf said in direct response to my inquiry -- These variables are set by Apache and PHP repopulates them on each request, so I don't really see how PHP could be causing this. -Rasmus I feel like the middleman in a he-said-she-said fight ;) Judging by a Google search for his name, he should certainly be in the know. Any other suggestions? Did you tell him that the variables are correct in CGI scripts but not in php pages? That seems pretty conclusive to me. Joshua. - The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project. See URL:http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html for more info. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] from the digest: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] Redirect in .htaccess w/ FileInfo off.
Hi, New problem. We wouldf very much love to allow users to use Redirect in .htaccess but must disallow FileInfo to turn off things like PHP. FileInfo is needed to allow Redirect. Is there any way to either re-enable redirect specifically without allowing FineInfo? I'm thinking no and it's a little upsetting that Apache doesn't seem to have finer granularity here unless I'm missing something. Oh, using 1.3 here, but 2.0 appears to have the same problem. Thank you kindly. --- Chris Johnson |Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Systems Administrator |Web: http://www.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/~johnson NMR Center |Voice:617.726.0949 Mass. General Hospital |FAX: 617.726.7422 149 (2301) 13th Street |Reality is merely an illusion, albeit a very Charlestown, MA., 02129 USA | persistant one. Albert Einstein --- - The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project. See URL:http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html for more info. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] from the digest: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Environment Variable contamination between vhosts - 1.3.33
-Original Message-
From: Joshua Slive [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, August 09, 2005 8:14 AM
To: users@httpd.apache.org
Subject: Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Environment Variable contamination between
vhosts - 1.3.33
On 8/8/05, Marc Powell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Well... no luck there. PHP's Rasmus Lerdorf said in direct response
to
my inquiry --
These variables are set by Apache and PHP repopulates them on each
request, so I don't really see how PHP could be causing this.
-Rasmus
I feel like the middleman in a he-said-she-said fight ;) Judging by
a
Google search for his name, he should certainly be in the know.
Any other suggestions?
Did you tell him that the variables are correct in CGI scripts but not
in php pages? That seems pretty conclusive to me.
Yes, and provided the exact script used --
Using --
#!/usr/bin/perl
##
## printenv -- demo CGI program which just prints its environment
##
print Content-type: text/plain\n\n;
foreach $var (sort(keys(%ENV))) {
$val = $ENV{$var};
$val =~ s|\n|\\n|g;
$val =~ s||\\|g;
print ${var}=\${val}\\n;
}
I do not see the issue. This is why the apache guys thought it was a php
issue.
--
Marc
-
The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project.
See URL:http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html for more info.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
from the digest: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Redirect in .htaccess w/ FileInfo off.
On 8/9/05, Chris Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, New problem. We wouldf very much love to allow users to use Redirect in .htaccess but must disallow FileInfo to turn off things like PHP. FileInfo is needed to allow Redirect. Is there any way to either re-enable redirect specifically without allowing FineInfo? I'm thinking no and it's a little upsetting that Apache doesn't seem to have finer granularity here unless I'm missing something. Oh, using 1.3 here, but 2.0 appears to have the same problem. No, there is no direct way to do this. But there are plenty of other ways to accomplish the same goal. For example: 1. Allow FileInfo but use a php_admin_flag engine off or similar setting to assure that php can't be used. 2. Allow FileInfo but use other administrative measures to keep your users in line. (A rule with posted consequences for violations plus a simple cron job for enforcement should work fine.) Joshua. - The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project. See URL:http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html for more info. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] from the digest: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Redirect in .htaccess w/ FileInfo off.
On Tue, 9 Aug 2005, Joshua Slive wrote: On 8/9/05, Chris Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, New problem. We wouldf very much love to allow users to use Redirect in .htaccess but must disallow FileInfo to turn off things like PHP. FileInfo is needed to allow Redirect. Is there any way to either re-enable redirect specifically without allowing FineInfo? I'm thinking no and it's a little upsetting that Apache doesn't seem to have finer granularity here unless I'm missing something. Oh, using 1.3 here, but 2.0 appears to have the same problem. No, there is no direct way to do this. But there are plenty of other ways to accomplish the same goal. For example: 1. Allow FileInfo but use a php_admin_flag engine off or similar setting to assure that php can't be used. Turns off php true, but there's also perl. Is there anything like this for mod_perl at all? 2. Allow FileInfo but use other administrative measures to keep your users in line. (A rule with posted consequences for violations plus a simple cron job for enforcement should work fine.) Joshua. Yeah. Problem there is that this is an after thie horse has escaped deal. True I can do nasty things but only after my server is trashed. --- Chris Johnson |Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Systems Administrator |Web: http://www.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/~johnson NMR Center |Voice:617.726.0949 Mass. General Hospital |FAX: 617.726.7422 149 (2301) 13th Street |The two most abundant things in the Universe Charlestown, MA., 02129 USA | are hydrogen and stupidity. Harlan Ellison --- - The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project. See URL:http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html for more info. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] from the digest: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] Patch against httpd-2.0.49 Bug#: 10722
Hello, I am trying to setup Reverse Proxy Server on Windows 2003 machine. I am using Apache 2.0. One of the software we are deploying uses cookies and javascript for redirect and that caused problem with the reverse proxy modules I had. I was suggested to apply patch for bug #10722 (http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10722). However, I don't have windows compiler to create DLL file for mod_proxy. Does anyone has mod_proxy.dll for this patch? Thanks in advance. Regards, Shahzad Bhatti Integrated Software Specialists http://www.issintl.com 1901 North Roselle Road, Suite 450 Schaumburg, IL 60195 Phone: 847-558-5342 Fax: 847-240-5073 - The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project. See URL:http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html for more info. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] from the digest: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] Why does Apache use up all my memory?
I read an earlier thread on memory consumption (http://tinyurl.com/bly4d), which may be related to my problem... but because of some differences, I'm not so sure. Any help would be appreciated! I have an Apache 2.0.54 server on a Gentoo Linux (2.6.11) box which has 1Gig RAM and an additional 1Gig swap space. The server handles a lot of people downloading sermons from our church website (which are no larger than 18Meg MP3 files), but I can't figure out how to keep the server from running out of memory. Here's my Apache2 prefork configuration: IfModule prefork.c StartServers 5 MinSpareServers 5 MaxSpareServers 10 MaxClients 20 MaxRequestsPerChild 5000 /IfModule And here's what the Apache /server-status URL showed earlier today (I had just restarted the server, but it immediately filled up with download requests, all from the same guy, apparently using a download accelerator judging by the duplicate requests): Srv PID M CPUReq Request 0-015822W 0.48 0GET /out/181.mp3 HTTP/1.1 1-015823W 0.001742573500GET /out/388.mp3 HTTP/1.1 2-015824W 0.001742573499GET /out/238.mp3 HTTP/1.1 3-015825W 0.001742573499GET /out/504.mp3 HTTP/1.1 4-015826W 0.001742573496GET /out/388.mp3 HTTP/1.1 5-015832W 0.001742572495GET /out/801.mp3 HTTP/1.1 6-015834W 0.001742571493GET /out/504.mp3 HTTP/1.1 7-015835W 0.001742571489GET /out/504.mp3 HTTP/1.1 8-015838W 0.001742570476GET /out/388.mp3 HTTP/1.1 9-015839W 0.001742570484GET /out/504.mp3 HTTP/1.1 10-015840W 0.60 0GET /out/238.mp3 HTTP/1.1 11-015841W 0.001742570477GET /out/388.mp3 HTTP/1.1 12-015846W 0.25 0GET /out/181.mp3 HTTP/1.1 13-015847W 0.001742569347GET /out/181.mp3 HTTP/1.1 14-015848W 0.001742568761GET /out/801.mp3 HTTP/1.1 15-015849W 0.001742568761GET /out/801.mp3 HTTP/1.1 16-015852W 0.19 0GET /out/181.mp3 HTTP/1.1 17-015853W 0.17 0GET /out/801.mp3 HTTP/1.1 18-015854W 0.22 0GET /out/504.mp3 HTTP/1.1 19-015855W 0.28 0GET /server-status HTTP/1.1 And here's a portion of what top showed at the same time: top - 18:09:59 up 64 days, 7:08, 3 users, load avg: 21.62, 10.57, 4.70 Tasks: 154 total, 1 running, 143 sleeping, 1 stopped, 9 zombie Cpu(s): 0.8% us, 2.3% sy, 0.0% ni, 0.0% id, 96.3% wa, 0.3% hi, 0.2% si Mem: 1034276k total, 1021772k used,12504k free, 6004k buffers Swap: 1030316k total, 985832k used,44484k free,83812k cached PID USER PR NI VIRT RES SHR S %CPU %MEMTIME+ COMMAND 15846 apache16 0 132m 89m 1968 S 0.3 8.9 0:01.46 apache2 15840 apache17 0 130m 83m 2008 D 0.0 8.3 0:00.90 apache2 15849 apache16 0 120m 82m 1968 S 0.3 8.1 0:01.02 apache2 15852 apache16 0 120m 81m 1968 S 0.3 8.1 0:00.91 apache2 15848 apache16 0 109m 73m 2008 S 0.3 7.2 0:00.85 apache2 15855 apache16 0 107m 70m 2076 D 0.3 7.0 0:00.76 apache2 15822 apache17 0 179m 55m 1968 D 0.3 5.5 0:00.88 apache2 15854 apache16 0 98024 55m 1968 D 0.0 5.5 0:00.58 apache2 15853 apache18 0 98.9m 53m 2000 S 0.0 5.3 0:00.51 apache2 15847 apache17 0 86884 52m 1968 D 0.0 5.2 0:00.42 apache2 15841 apache17 0 110m 36m 1964 D 0.3 3.6 0:00.64 apache2 15826 apache17 0 173m 20m 1968 D 0.0 2.0 0:00.57 apache2 15825 apache16 0 97.7m 19m 1968 D 0.0 1.9 0:00.36 apache2 15834 apache16 0 117m 14m 1968 D 0.3 1.5 0:00.42 apache2 15839 apache17 0 115m 12m 1968 D 0.0 1.2 0:00.40 apache2 15838 apache15 0 182m 12m 1968 D 0.0 1.2 0:00.59 apache2 15823 apache16 0 180m 11m 1968 D 0.0 1.1 0:00.65 apache2 15824 apache15 0 103m 9980 1968 D 0.0 1.0 0:00.27 apache2 15832 apache16 0 116m 9112 1968 D 0.0 0.9 0:00.29 apache2 15835 apache16 0 162m 8844 1968 D 0.0 0.9 0:00.41 apache2 (everything else listed on top below this was less than 0.5 for %MEM) The memory usage swelled very fast as the download requests came in, and based on previous experience, the server would have slowed to a crawl and possible crashed as it tried to save itself if I hadn't run killall apache2 at this point. So it seems like this guy's 19 download requests are enough to pretty much exhaust my 1 Gig of physical RAM and 1 Gig of swap space. That just
Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Redirect in .htaccess w/ FileInfo off.
On 8/9/05, Chris Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Tue, 9 Aug 2005, Joshua Slive wrote: 1. Allow FileInfo but use a php_admin_flag engine off or similar setting to assure that php can't be used. Turns off php true, but there's also perl. Is there anything like this for mod_perl at all? Almost certainly yes. I'm not a mod_perl expert, but PerlOptions -Enable seems to do it. There's also SetHandler default-handler and Options -ExecCGI Joshua. - The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project. See URL:http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html for more info. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] from the digest: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Environment Variable contamination between vhosts - 1.3.33
These variables are set by Apache and PHP repopulates them on each request, so I don't really see how PHP could be causing this. Perhaps shared memory? Joost - The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project. See URL:http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html for more info. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] from the digest: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] Managing enterprise deployments of Apache
greetings fellow Apache users, i've been looking around for solutions for managing enterprise (or just larger) deployments of apache and have found some older projects (comanche, mohawk, etc) that seem to be out of date and long since abandoned. i've also found the Novell Apache Manager which looks like what i'm searching for, but it has next to no documentation. it also seems to be lacking pieces that would make it possible to use. anyway, on to my point. is there any OSS solutions (or any for that matter, OSS or not) that anyone is using with success? i'm looking for the ability to manage current deployments/configurations (httpd.conf) and roll out new deployments quickly and efficiently. i figured i would ask the list before i started devoting my time to rolling my own solution (that time would be better used contributing to something already existing). thanks for any ideas or information you have, -nathan benson - The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project. See URL:http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html for more info. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] from the digest: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [Fwd: ApacheCon US 2005 CFP slightly extended]
I don't think I've seen an announcement for the ApacheCon US Call for Papers on this list. A little last minute, but check the link below for more details. Original Message Subject: ApacheCon US 2005 CFP slightly extended Date: Tue, 09 Aug 2005 16:09:30 -0400 From: Rich Bowen [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] Since folks are always rushing to get their talks in at the last minute, we've extended the CFP just slightly to allow you to get in under the wire. The new deadline is THURSDAY, AUGUST 11th, 23:59 PACIFIC TIME (USA). Talks received after this time *cannot* be considered, since we will be starting our meeting Friday morning to choose the talks which will be scheduled. Thanks -- Rich, for the ApacheCon Planners http://apachecon.com/ - The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project. See URL:http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html for more info. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] from the digest: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mod_proxy/mod_proxy_html
Hello, I am trying to setup Reverse Proxy Server on Windows 2003 machine. I am using Apache 2.0. The application uses a single-sign-on software, which redirects to the application upon successful authentication. So, the user first accesses http://extranet.myserver.com/myapp, which is name of apache reverse proxy server. It redirects to the single-sign-on application https://extranet.myserver.com/sso Now, internally the application uses internal server names, so after successful login, the sso application uses 302/Location field in the header to redirect to the application server. However this is not caught by mod_proxy and user can't access to the application. Is there any way to catch this at the reverse proxy so that it can rewrite the internal server name. Thanks in advance. Regards, Shahzad Bhatti Integrated Software Specialists http://www.issintl.com 1901 North Roselle Road, Suite 450 Schaumburg, IL 60195 Phone: 847-558-5342 Fax: 847-240-5073 - The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project. See URL:http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html for more info. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] from the digest: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] Virtual Hosts public_html Folder
This is how most of my virtual hosts are set up: VirtualHost *:80 ServerName geoworld ServerAlias geoworld *.geoworld DocumentRoot c:\sites\geoworld /VirtualHost However, I read somewhere that it's better to put your sites inside a folder named public_html, then set up your virtual host like this: VirtualHost *:80 ServerName geozoo ServerAlias geozoo *.geozoo DocumentRoot c:\sites\geozoo\public_html /VirtualHost Can anyone tell me if that's better and why? I've set a couple sites up like that, and everything seems to work OK, but I don't want to go to the trouble of changing all my sites if there's no real advantage. Thanks. __ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com - The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project. See URL:http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html for more info. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] from the digest: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Virtual Hosts public_html Folder
David Blomstrom wrote: This is how most of my virtual hosts are set up: VirtualHost *:80 ServerName geoworld ServerAlias geoworld *.geoworld DocumentRoot c:\sites\geoworld /VirtualHost However, I read somewhere that it's better to put your sites inside a folder named public_html, then set up your virtual host like this: VirtualHost *:80 ServerName geozoo ServerAlias geozoo *.geozoo DocumentRoot c:\sites\geozoo\public_html /VirtualHost Can anyone tell me if that's better and why? I've set a couple sites up like that, and everything seems to work OK, but I don't want to go to the trouble of changing all my sites if there's no real advantage. The second alternative is probably better for most installations. Remember that any file that lies under the document root is potentially visible to all the world. Any files that will never be served via Apache should not be under the document root. Having that extra layer of directories gives you more flexibility in organizing and controlling your files. Of course there's no reason why the document root needs to be called 'public_html' in particular. - The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project. See URL:http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html for more info. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] from the digest: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Virtual Hosts public_html Folder
Oops, I think I goofed. I should have clarified that these are for my LOCAL sites. All my online sites are insisde a folder named public_html. Do your comments still stand - is it a good idea to put my websites inside folders named public_html even on my computer? Thanks. --- John Hicks [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: David Blomstrom wrote: This is how most of my virtual hosts are set up: VirtualHost *:80 ServerName geoworld ServerAlias geoworld *.geoworld DocumentRoot c:\sites\geoworld /VirtualHost However, I read somewhere that it's better to put your sites inside a folder named public_html, then set up your virtual host like this: VirtualHost *:80 ServerName geozoo ServerAlias geozoo *.geozoo DocumentRoot c:\sites\geozoo\public_html /VirtualHost Can anyone tell me if that's better and why? I've set a couple sites up like that, and everything seems to work OK, but I don't want to go to the trouble of changing all my sites if there's no real advantage. The second alternative is probably better for most installations. Remember that any file that lies under the document root is potentially visible to all the world. Any files that will never be served via Apache should not be under the document root. Having that extra layer of directories gives you more flexibility in organizing and controlling your files. Of course there's no reason why the document root needs to be called 'public_html' in particular. Start your day with Yahoo! - make it your home page http://www.yahoo.com/r/hs - The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project. See URL:http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html for more info. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] from the digest: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Virtual Hosts public_html Folder
It was thus said that the Great David Blomstrom once stated: Oops, I think I goofed. I should have clarified that these are for my LOCAL sites. All my online sites are insisde a folder named public_html. Do your comments still stand - is it a good idea to put my websites inside folders named public_html even on my computer? It's neither here nor there. public_html came about as a means for people with accounts on a Unix system to put their homepages. Back when I was in college, with an account on the Computer Science and Engineering Unix system, all a user had to do was create a public_html directory [1] in their home directory (in my case, my home directory was /home/spc, so my website would served up from /home/spc/public_html/---for my friend Ken, his home directory was /home/ken and his homepage would be /home/ken/public_html/) and was referenced via a URL like: http://www.cse.fau.edu/~spc/ So that's where the public_html portion comes from (and in Apache, one would do UserDir public_html Directory /home/*/public_html # stuff to limit what could be done # in the user's homepages /Directory Now, on to your question---what directory you use really depends upon what you need done with the site. For the sites that I directly control, I have the following: /http/spc/sites/ This directory contains all the sites I own (or host for my friends). The /http/ directory contains all web related data on the server, and the spc/ directory beneath that is where my sites are stored (there are several different groups---this makes it easy to keep track of who owns what). Under sites/ I have, for example: www.conman.org/ boston.conman.org/ bible.conman.org/ www.flummux.org/ dw.flummux.org/ www.hhgproject.org/ As you can see, some of my domains have (what I later learned were called) sub-domains---I just treat them as seperate sites as far as Apache is concerned. Under each of these I typically have: htdocs/ cgi-bin/ Although I could have called both of these by other names---I could have used html, httpdocs, web, public_html or heck, even Fred if I were so inclined. Yes, the structure is a bit deep, but it allows me the ability to store all data associated with a site under its own directory, even if not all of it is directly served by Apache. For instance, under my boston.conman.org site, I have: htdocs/ # static pages for my blog cgi-bin/# CGI scripts journal/# where the templates and database (roughly) # for my blog is stored. This has all the information pertaining to my site www.conman.org. /http is the location of *all* the webpages served up by the server. spc is where all *my* sites are stored (there are several groups here), Within the sites/ directory, I have directories for each site I serve up, and inside htdocs/ # web pages cgi-bin/# CGI scripts The reason I include the full name instead of just the domain name is because a few of my sites have sub-domains that have content---for instance within /http/spc/sites/boston.conman.org/ I have: htdocs/ # static pages for my blog cgi-bin/# CGI scripts journal/# data files for my blog, including templates and # entries notify/ # scripts used to notify people via email when # I make updates Now, if what you have works, by all means, continue using it. My method works for me (and I use this structure, more or less [2], across several servers and about 1,200 sites), it may not for you. -spc (There's more than one way to do it ... ) [1] If you are unsure what I mean by directory, think folder---I personally find the Windows stuff a bit confusing and prefer Unix. [2] There are some groups where the structure is: /http/group/domain/logs # log files /http/group/domain/web # webpages /http/group/domain/web/cgi-bin/ # CGI scripts Similar to the structure I use, but just slightly different names and a slightly different layout. Thanks. --- John Hicks [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: David Blomstrom wrote: This is how most of my virtual hosts are set up: VirtualHost *:80 ServerName geoworld ServerAlias geoworld *.geoworld DocumentRoot c:\sites\geoworld /VirtualHost However, I read somewhere that it's better to put your sites inside a folder named public_html, then set up your virtual host like this: VirtualHost *:80 ServerName geozoo ServerAlias geozoo *.geozoo DocumentRoot
