Re: gnome/XFCE desktop wallpaper problem - it won't stay!

2011-06-13 Thread Joe Zeff
On 06/12/2011 08:53 AM, BeartoothHOS wrote:
   Did you start wallpapoz and not turn it off? It'll do that.

I beg to differ.  I use wallpapoz on both my desktop and my laptop and 
haven't had the slightest difficulty because of it.
-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines


Re: Adieu, Fedora

2011-06-13 Thread Joe Zeff
On 06/12/2011 05:07 PM, James McKenzie wrote:
 he decision has been made, for
 us by others, that the desktop will move into the 21st Century.

I would rather say that certain people have decided what the desktop of 
the 21st Century will be and have also decided that the rest of us will 
have no choice but to go along with them.  Who knows; they may be right, 
but if so, I'll stick with the desktop of the Second Millennium, TYVM, 
and if that means no longer using Gnome, then that's what I'll do. 
However, I do hope that all of you who continue with Gnome are happy 
with it because, as has been pointed out many times, Linux is all about 
choice, and there's room for many different ways of doing things.
-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines


Re: Adieu, Fedora

2011-06-13 Thread Joe Zeff
On 06/12/2011 07:54 PM, James McKenzie wrote:
 People are tired of using poor quality software written
 to a broken OS.

Say rather that most people are so used to badly written software and a 
broken OS that they don't realize how bad things are; they think it's 
normal.

Right now, I'm house sitting for Jerry Pournelle 
(http://www.jerrypournelle.com) the BYTE columnist and SF author.  For 
years he's been calling both Unix and Linux an employment program for 
gurus.  Mind you, he does stuff on his Windows boxes that most power 
users couldn't understand, but that's different; he understands DOS 
commands.  I'm still trying, off and on, to get him to take another look 
at Linux.  Not Fedora, Ubuntu, because if he's going to try Linux, he's 
going to need a distro that's as easy to use as possible because he has 
neither the time nor the inclination for the learning curve that Fedora 
would require.  Still, if I can get him to see how good it is, we'll 
have a vocal and highly-visible advocate on our side.  (Please note that 
he's not too much of a Windows fanatic.  I think he has at least one 
Linux server here, and I know he's experimented with recent Macs and had 
good things to say about them.)  So getting a Good Word about Linux from 
his is worth getting because there are a lot of people out there who 
heed his word.

The point is, you have to match the distro to the user, not the other 
way around.  If the OP isn't happy with Fedora, I hope he finds a distro 
he likes better.
-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines


Re: OT: allow ordinary user to read /var/log/audit/audit.log

2011-06-13 Thread Hiisi
On 12 June 2011 17:30, Andre Speelmans fedora-l...@cosiso.nl wrote:
 Surely I can. I just thought there should be the other way. Say, thru
 sudo. Well, it seems that changing file attributes is the only way
 here.

 Add this to the Cmnd_alias:
 less  /var/log/audit/audit.log

When I'm trying to save /etc/sudoers with the folloeing line:

Cmnd_Alias HOSPES = /sbin/service, /sbin/chkconfig,
/usr/sbin/setsebool, /sbin/restorecon, /usr/sbin/semanage,
/usr/sbin/setenforce, less  /var/log/audit/audit.log
it falls with error:
/etc/sudoers: syntax error near line 34 

What's wrong with it?

 --
 Kind regards,

 André
--
Hiisi
-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines


Re: Adieu, Fedora

2011-06-13 Thread mike cloaked
On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 5:38 AM, Marcus D. Leech mle...@ripnet.com wrote:

 Yup, man pages aren't very friendly for newbs.  But they aren't really
 intended for that audience.
  They're intended as handy reference documents, rather than tutorials.
 Some of them are better
  written than others.  Unfortunately, not all software developers are
 also skilled technical writers.
  Sad fact.  In a well-funded corporate effort, there'd be tech writers
 working alongside the developers.
  The fact is that more competent software developers are drawn to the
 open-source world than
  tech writers.

A lot of information on how to do things in linux actually comes from
lists exactly like this one!  There is a need for some simple startup
tips for the new user, and to a large extent a new user will likely
have had his/her system installed by someone else who knows how to do
the install, rather than converting from Windows themselves (though it
does happen of course) - and remember that the vast majority of
Windows users never did or ever will do an install themselves - they
buy a laptop or desktop, and hit the power button - and it all comes
to life.  If a Linux geek installs a system, be it F14, F15, or any
other, on behalf of an existing Windows user, and then gives the new
Fedora system to the user they will largely be able to work with it
with only a little help initially - they may need help with
configuring a mail client, but that would be the same for Windows
users too.

Many people would be happy with a web browser, a music player, and a
picture viewer, plus printer - after that many programs for a typical
user get much less use time.

I think that in that instance an average Windows user confronted with
a new linux system, and shown how to login would be off and running
quite quickly - the problem arises when something does not work -
and in the case of Windows that is also where the user gets very stuck
and often then either calls in an expert, or tries to fix it
him/her-self - often producing a broken system that needs an expert
calling in also! Much the same for inexperienced linux users too!   I
have installed linux for friends and relatives, and remain the
expert helping hand for when things go wrong. For a Windows system
there is always the fallback to take the machine down to the local
PCworld or similar where technicians will try to fix the machine or
re-install the system - that commercial route is not usually available
to linux noobs.

However there are wiki pages for linux, as well as the Fedora lists
and similar and are a superb and valuable resource, and also some very
excellent help written on dedicated web pages (such as the kde web
pages) - and although we often grumble when something is broken in
linux, and specifically Fedora, we are actually in a very fortunate
position that we have bugzilla to which not only other users respond,
but also developers - it may take time but usually there is a solution
in the end - and we always have to remember that we are riding the
cutting edge! Quite often linux experts provide wonderful levels of
direct help and advice on Fedora lists and similar.  Show me rapid
responses to Windows bugs?  Where and how do Windows problems get
fixed with an interactive dialogue with the reporter? It doesn't!

So despite the Fedora issues with systemd, and gnome3, currently -
these are being worked on - and although it may take a release cycle
to fix some of the issues we are actually still the best in the
business, so let's not forget our real position.

-- 
mike c
-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines


Re: Adieu, Fedora

2011-06-13 Thread mike cloaked
On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 6:11 AM, Antonio Olivares
olivares14...@yahoo.com wrote:

 Why?  There are many people out there that play games, and for gaming no OS 
 out there, no Crossover, wine, ..., Virtual machines out there beat windows.  
 Most of the games are for windows and till linux  creates games that are on 
 par with the ones that are played in windows.


It is perfectly possible to run Fedora, with a Windows VM, and then
play the games in the VM!  That way you get the security of linux with
the wonderful fallback if the Windows VM get messed up - just pull the
VM back from that backup file that you of course always keep up to
date - and you are done - none of that install, reboot, update,
reboot, update, reboot, install new game package, reboot, update,
reboot, reboot, reboot - oh dear have I overused the reboot word by
one!

Despite the problems Fedora still rocks!

-- 
mike c
-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines


Re: OT: allow ordinary user to read /var/log/audit/audit.log

2011-06-13 Thread Ed Greshko
On 06/13/2011 03:02 PM, Hiisi wrote:
 On 12 June 2011 17:30, Andre Speelmans fedora-l...@cosiso.nl wrote:
 Surely I can. I just thought there should be the other way. Say, thru
 sudo. Well, it seems that changing file attributes is the only way
 here.
 Add this to the Cmnd_alias:
 less  /var/log/audit/audit.log

 When I'm trying to save /etc/sudoers with the folloeing line:

 Cmnd_Alias HOSPES = /sbin/service, /sbin/chkconfig,
 /usr/sbin/setsebool, /sbin/restorecon, /usr/sbin/semanage,
 /usr/sbin/setenforce, less  /var/log/audit/audit.log
 it falls with error:
 /etc/sudoers: syntax error near line 34 

 What's wrong with it?

Full path to less?/usr/bin/less


-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines


Re: Is yum dependency resolution upside down?

2011-06-13 Thread Michael Schwendt
On Mon, 13 Jun 2011 12:55:02 +0800, KP wrote:

 I don't know if it is yum, the package group definitions or the package
 dependencies that are wrong - but no matter who is to blame - the result is
 definitely not intuitive (or imho correct)...

You read the dependencies backwards.

 Below are a few examples:
 
 # yum -C groupremove Dial-up Networking Support
 
 Is removing ppp - and NetworkManager for dependencies:
 --
 Removing:
  pppi686 2.4.5-12.fc14  @updates  752 
 k
 Removing for dependencies:
  NetworkManager i686 1:0.8.4-1.fc14 @updates  5.5 
 M
  NetworkManager-gnome   i686 1:0.8.4-1.fc14 @updates  1.5 
 M
  NetworkManager-openvpn i686 1:0.8.1-1.fc14 
 @anaconda-InstallationRepo-201010211
  NetworkManager-vpnci686 1:0.8.1-1.fc14 
 @anaconda-InstallationRepo-201010211
 --
 
 NetworkManager is part of (installed) System Tools group - not dial-up modem
 so why does it even consider to remove it?

Notice the Removing and Removing for dependencies headers.
If you remove ppp, you cannot keep any packages that depend on ppp.
Your option in such a scenario is to remove leaf packages only, or to
erase individual packages (with either Yum or RPM).

$ repoquery --whatrequires ppp
ppp-0:2.4.5-17.fc15.x86_64
NetworkManager-1:0.8.999-2.git20110509.fc15.x86_64
NetworkManager-1:0.8.9997-2.git20110531.fc15.x86_64
NetworkManager-pptp-1:0.8.999-1.fc15.x86_64
bluemodem-0:0.7-6.fc15.x86_64
kdenetwork-7:4.6.2-2.fc15.x86_64
kdenetwork-7:4.6.3-1.fc15.x86_64
ppp-0:2.4.5-17.fc15.x86_64
pptp-0:1.7.2-12.fc15.x86_64
rp-pppoe-0:3.10-8.fc15.x86_64
synce-serial-0:0.11-5.fc15.x86_64
wvdial-0:1.61-4.fc15.x86_64
xfce4-modemlights-plugin-0:0.1.3.99-7.fc15.x86_64
xl2tpd-0:1.2.7-3.fc15.x86_64

For your other non-detailed examples, one would need to look at the
details (= the dependencies) to understand why something would be removed.
-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines


Re: Adieu, Fedora

2011-06-13 Thread Alan Cox
 The point is, you have to match the distro to the user, not the other 
 way around.  If the OP isn't happy with Fedora, I hope he finds a distro 
 he likes better.

The primary end user Linux UI is Android. In that sense the argument is
over for the moment.

Alan
-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines


Re: Is yum dependency resolution upside down?

2011-06-13 Thread Klaus Pedersen
On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 4:31 PM, Michael Schwendt mschwe...@gmail.com wrote:

 You read the dependencies backwards.
[...]
 If you remove ppp, you cannot keep any packages that depend on ppp.

Remember that what I wanted was to remove Dial-up Networking Support - it is
not expected that this operation should remove all Networking!

Just as when I tried to remove Electronic Lab - it is not expected that this
operation should remove eclipse, fonts and screensavers, right?

I am pretty sure I had fonts and screensavers before I installed drawtiming
and openocd. Do you see what I mean?

 Your option in such a scenario is to remove leaf packages only, or to
 erase individual packages (with either Yum or RPM).

Good point - I can remove NetworkManager and eclipse myself !! :-P

My point is that groupremove doesn't do the right thing. If I installed
eclipse using Fedora Eclipse then I don't want it automatically removed when
I uninstall something unrelated because of complicated indirect dependencies.

The same way I don't want to uninstall NetworkManager from the group
System Tools, when I try to remove the group Dial-up Networking Support.
-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines


Printer still not working with LibreOffice, etc.

2011-06-13 Thread Lawrence E Graves
Fedora 15 is still flushing my printer.
-- 
Lawrence E Graves lgra...@risingstarmbc.com

-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines


Re: OT: allow ordinary user to read /var/log/audit/audit.log

2011-06-13 Thread Hiisi
On 13 June 2011 11:52, Ed Greshko ed.gres...@greshko.com wrote:
--SNIP--

 Cmnd_Alias HOSPES = /sbin/service, /sbin/chkconfig,
 /usr/sbin/setsebool, /sbin/restorecon, /usr/sbin/semanage,
 /usr/sbin/setenforce, less  /var/log/audit/audit.log
 it falls with error:
 /etc/sudoers: syntax error near line 34 

 What's wrong with it?

 Full path to less?    /usr/bin/less



Yeah, now it works!
Spasibo, Eduard.
--
Hiisi
-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines


software time lock and web access control

2011-06-13 Thread Javier Perez
Hi
Is there any easy to use and setup program to control web access for a user?
also to set time of day allowed usage of certain programs?
This for a home computer using Fedora 14.

I know maybe a combintion of IPTABLES and probably SQUID should do the
trick, but

1. I want something easy to use and modify, not something that would force
me to open the gusts of the system up.
2. Likewise, I am not sure if I can block stuff on a user basis with
IPTABLES and SQUID. As Far as I have read, whatever configuration I set up
with them, will work the same for ALL Users.

So far I just started studying this issue an I am just beginning my
research, I just want to be pointed at on the right direction.

In the end I know once kids learn enough they will be able to bypass all
these walls, but I will deal with it when I reach that level...

-- 
--
 /\_/\
 |O O|  pepeb...@gmail.com
  Javier Perez
   While the night runs
   toward the day...
  m m   Pepebuho watches
from his high perch.
-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines


Re: outdated Tor version in Fedora (missing security fixes)

2011-06-13 Thread Daniel J Walsh
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

On 06/10/2011 11:38 PM, Fennix wrote:
 On Sat, Jun 11, 2011 at 8:30 AM, Christoph A. cas...@gmail.com
 mailto:cas...@gmail.com wrote:
 
 -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
 Hash: SHA512
 
 On 06/10/2011 06:28 PM, Fennix wrote:
  As to the SELinux policy questions...I am not sure. I have always
 compiled
  and the TOR package has always worked without any SELinux
 complaints so for
  this question I have never looked into this.
 
 the output of the following command would provide the answer to the
 tor_t question:
 ps auxZ|grep /tor
 (executed on the host running the self compiled Tor)
 
 
 The result I get is as follows:
 
 unconfined_u:unconfined_r:unconfined_t:s0-s0:c0.c1023 root 14189 0.0 
 0.0 4432 760 pts/1 S+ 11:36   0:00 grep --color=auto /torH
 
 /fennix
 
Has the tor executable location changed or is the label missing.

# restorecon -v PATHTO-TOR

Should change the label to tor_exec_t for either

/usr/bin/tor
/usr/sbin/tor

If you are using a different path, you can change the label using

# chcon -t tor_exec_t PATHTO-TOR

Or make the change permanently with

# semanage fcontext -a -t tor_exec_t PATHTO-TOR
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/

iEYEARECAAYFAk32AosACgkQrlYvE4MpobM88wCfUSk5K4UPwKtM0LQ7bDn0rtET
uSUAnRtgoWssqqTf+eTfyP/rHr/DVY85
=jxRo
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines


Re: Adieu, Fedora

2011-06-13 Thread Dave Ihnat
On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 08:42:57AM +0100, mike cloaked wrote:
 A lot of information on how to do things in linux actually comes from
 lists exactly like this one!

Well, yes.  As does a lot of help for Windows, and Mac...  But the newbies
won't see them.

And they won't do the Tour in XP, or Vista, or 7--I've been a consultant
for over 30 years, and nobody I've helped or worked with has *ever* done
the Tour that they've admitted to me.

They ask me, or others.  They look for books; just looking on Amazon in
books with the keyword Windows gives top choices (just picking the
starter books):

  Windows 7 For Dummies
  Microsoft Operating Systems
  Windows 7: The Missing Manual
  Windows 7 Inside Out
  Windows 7 Step by Step
  Windows 7 For Seniors for Dummies

And it goes on...and on...for pages.  54,050 results (although we all know
what counts such as that mean, it's apples to apples for similar searches.)

Now, look for Linux--again, only picking the starter books:

  Linux in a Nutshell
  Beginning Ubuntu Linux
  Linux for Dummies
  Practical Guide to Ubuntu Linux
  Linux All-in-One For Dummies
  Practical Unix/Linux (For the Rest of Us)

But there are 7,391 results.

Differences?  Well, clearly, far fewer hits than for Windows.  But
qualitatively:

  o The first couple of pages of the Linux search show far, far more
guru/kernel/CLI/development hits, fewer general-user beginner hits (I
had to go more pages in to get the same count of six beginner books.)

  o The distro that shows up most often is Ubuntu.  They're doing something
right--that's getting the attention of the authors.

So if they're inclined to learn about a system, most often I've been asked
Is there a book?, not Should I take the Tour? (well, the latter, never.)

But the other problem is simple familiarity--by now, Windows 7, almost
all users have gone through at least one Windows OS (XP--I'm not counting
Vista); many have worked on two or more.  There *is* a continuity in
behavior, operation, and expectation; even Windows 7 shows its roots
going back to Windows 95 in the UI.  And users crave that comfortable
familiarity; when trying something new, abnormal behavior will strike
hardest, and frustration with what should be simple tasks will cost much
more.

An excellent example--just this weekend, a friend who's technologically
savvy in her field (oceanographic research) and very well-inclined to
Linux decided to try to install a dual-boot Ubuntu/Windows XP system.

We all know that graphics support has been the bugaboo (right ahead of
wireless); recent Ubuntu distros (and probably others) have gotten pretty
darn good at detecting and properly setting up adapters.  Unfortunately,
hers wasn't one of them--so there was an immediate Arrgh! from her.
Worse, Grub didn't properly see her USB keyboard, so now she's not able to
go back to her XP installation.  Sure, the Grub thing is (probably) a BIOS
configuration problem--legacy USB probably needs to be turned on--but the
tolerance for such problems is low in a new installation, especially with
the fear of losing the current working OS installation.

And yes, xrandr helped--once she reached out--and, well, let her tell it:

I finally found the xwindows manager - that did recognize the Sony
monitor and allowed me to change the resolution so that I can see
the entire desktop.

The boot problem remains.  And I have a new problem... after watching
me go through this, the other member of the household is not keen
on this OS experiment, so I may just use that new disk I have for an
XP reinstall.  We noticed Ubuntu is not much faster booting or running
at all than the old installation of XP it does shut down faster.

So here's a well-disposed, intelligent but non-CS user who's actually
worked through the first major problem, and has a probable solution
for the second--but even so, is thinking of giving up because of those
issues--partly because of pressure from others in the house, partly
because she hasn't been able to get to the point of investigating the
system because of starter's unfamiliarity and initial problems that
colored the experience.

We need to get more beginner docco out there--and get it to people.  Maybe
downloading a Linux distro results in an E-Mail to the user with a link to
How Linux is Different from Windows--which is a video, and a text
document, and maybe a downloadable E-Book--that describes what they're
going to see, and how to do the same things in Linux they commonly have to
do in Windows, and how to solve common installation problems--and avoids
fanboi/religious rants while doing so.  (No, this doesn't exist, AFAIK).

Cheers,
--
Dave Ihnat
dih...@dminet.com
-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines


Re: Adieu, Fedora

2011-06-13 Thread Tom Horsley
On Mon, 13 Jun 2011 07:36:20 -0500
Dave Ihnat wrote:

 And users crave that comfortable
 familiarity; when trying something new, abnormal behavior will strike
 hardest, and frustration with what should be simple tasks will cost much
 more.

This problem extends even to phones :-). It was several weeks before
I discovered long press on my first (android) smart phone. Apparently
everyone just knows that long press is the equivalent on a touch
screen of right click with a mouse. There was a tutorial app on
the phone, but the only thing it talked about was the onscreen
keyboard.
-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines


Re: Is yum dependency resolution upside down?

2011-06-13 Thread Michael Schwendt
On Mon, 13 Jun 2011 17:48:12 +0800, KP wrote:

 On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 4:31 PM, Michael Schwendt wrote:
 
  You read the dependencies backwards.
 [...]
  If you remove ppp, you cannot keep any packages that depend on ppp.
 
 Remember that what I wanted was to remove Dial-up Networking Support - it is
 not expected that this operation should remove all Networking!

Then what is it supposed to do instead?

yum groupinfo 'Dial-up Networking Support' tells that ppp is a
Mandatory Package in that group. If you wanted to remove ppp, you would
need to remove everything that requires ppp. Do you understand that?
If so, you can tell Yum to exit its confirmation check by answering no.

 Just as when I tried to remove Electronic Lab - it is not expected that this
 operation should remove eclipse, fonts and screensavers, right?

Not right. At least the font packages you've mentioned are part of
that group:

$ yum groupinfo 'Electronic Lab'|grep font
   xorg-x11-fonts-100dpi
   xorg-x11-fonts-ISO8859-1-100dpi
   xorg-x11-fonts-ISO8859-9-100dpi
   xorg-x11-fonts-Type1

Same for several eclipse packages, which probably are required by
eclipse and hence can only be removed if eclipse gets removed as well:

$ yum groupinfo 'Electronic Lab'|grep ecli
   eclipse-cdt
   eclipse-dltk-tcl
   eclipse-eclox
   eclipse-epic
   eclipse-subclipse
   eclipse-texlipse
   eclipse-veditor

 I am pretty sure I had fonts and screensavers before I installed drawtiming
 and openocd. Do you see what I mean?

Not yet. Have you read the man yum section about groupremove and
remove yet?

Both commands are not the exact opposite of groupinstall and install due
to dependencies on additional packages. A groupinstall can add required packages
not listed in the group. Same for a normal install. yum install foo may pull
in packages that would not be removed by yum remove foo. A groupremove tries
to remove all packages listed in the group plus anything that depends on them,
which can be packages listed also in other groups.
-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines


Re: Is yum dependency resolution upside down?

2011-06-13 Thread Rahul Sundaram
On 06/13/2011 07:03 PM, Michael Schwendt wrote
 Both commands are not the exact opposite of groupinstall and install due
 to dependencies on additional packages. A groupinstall can add required 
 packages
 not listed in the group. Same for a normal install. yum install foo may pull
 in packages that would not be removed by yum remove foo. A groupremove tries
 to remove all packages listed in the group plus anything that depends on them,
 which can be packages listed also in other groups.

Also, if someone installed a group and wants to revert,  I recommend
using yum history undo instead of group remove

Rahul

-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines


Tweetdeck like Twitter client for your Fedora 14 desktop

2011-06-13 Thread valent.turko...@gmail.com
http://fusionlinux.org/2011/06/13/tweetdeck-like-twitter-client-for-your-fedora-14-desktop/

Twitter is badly broken on Fedora 14 because all currently available
twitter clients (like pino, qwit and mitter) don’t work with oauth
bazed twitter authorization.

Don’t fret, Turpial comes to the rescue. Turpial is twitter client
like Tweetdeck for Linux. Turpial is written in Python and aims to be
an application with low consumption of resources and integrates into
user’s desktop without sacrificing any functionality.

Turpial is awailable via fedora-updates-testing repo so to install it
follow these steps:
 1. open terminal window
 2. become root: su -
 3. install turpial: yum install turpial --enablerepo=updates-testing

It is needles to say that Fusion Linux in next release will have
Turpial enabled by default.

Check out some other cool articles on our Fusion Linux Blog and don’t
miss Fusion Linux Forums.


-- 
follow me - www.twitter.com/valentt  http://kernelreloaded.blog385.com
linux, anime, spirituality, wireless, scuba, linuxmce smart home, zwave
ICQ: 2125241, Skype: valent.turkovic, MSN: valent.turko...@hotmail.com
-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines


Re: Tweetdeck like Twitter client for your Fedora 14 desktop

2011-06-13 Thread Steven Stern
On 06/13/2011 08:47 AM, valent.turko...@gmail.com wrote:
 http://fusionlinux.org/2011/06/13/tweetdeck-like-twitter-client-for-your-fedora-14-desktop/

 Twitter is badly broken on Fedora 14 because all currently available
 twitter clients (like pino, qwit and mitter) don�t work with oauth
 bazed twitter authorization.

 Don�t fret, Turpial comes to the rescue. Turpial is twitter client
 like Tweetdeck for Linux. Turpial is written in Python and aims to be
 an application with low consumption of resources and integrates into
 user�s desktop without sacrificing any functionality.

 Turpial is awailable via fedora-updates-testing repo so to install it
 follow these steps:
   1. open terminal window
   2. become root: su -
   3. install turpial: yum install turpial --enablerepo=updates-testing

 It is needles to say that Fusion Linux in next release will have
 Turpial enabled by default.

 Check out some other cool articles on our Fusion Linux Blog and don�t
 miss Fusion Linux Forums.



Very nice.  One request:  Enable login for bit.ly so I can track my 
short URLs as I do through the bit.ly toolbar.

-- 
-- Steve
-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines


Re: git patch comments

2011-06-13 Thread Michael Cronenworth
Todd Zullinger wrote:
 For git commits, you should use the format:

 $subject

 $body

That's how the git patches are created. If it is supposed to work then 
it is a bug because it is not working that way. I'll get this posted to 
the git list/bugzilla when I can. Thanks.
-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines


Re: Adieu, Fedora

2011-06-13 Thread James McKenzie
On Sun, Jun 12, 2011 at 9:06 PM, Phil Savoie psavoie1...@rogers.com wrote:
 On 12/06/2011 11:12 PM, David wrote:
 I see. Now I understand you completely. Since Linux is user supported. I
 am sure that the developers would welcome any tutorials that you would
 write and provide. That is the way the Linux works.

 As for the folks in Redmond? I doubt that they will loose a minute of
 sleep over your efforts unless you really, really put forth major
 efforts in this respect.

 Have a good day.

 James,

 No point in arguing with this guy.
I'm not going to argue with him.  I'm pointing out why Linux is not
the rage on the desktop.  I know that RH folks lurk here and I will
respond to their messages in a civil and clear tone.  Remember, some
folks need training wheels on their bikes.  Some just crash until they
get it right (I was the latter.)  Some have their parents hold their
hands/seat.  Computer users are cut from the same silk and thus I am
one of those that charges ahead and if the system crashes, I rebuild
and start over...
James
-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines


sudoku-savant

2011-06-13 Thread Andrew Gray
Hi 

sudoku-savant is far too small 9x9 on 1600x1200 screen it needs ability
to resize the gui please 

Gnome3 F15 


-- 
Andrew Gray andr...@linnetsol.co.uk
linnet Solutions ltd


-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines


Re: Is yum dependency resolution upside down?

2011-06-13 Thread Klaus Pedersen
On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 9:33 PM, Michael Schwendt mschwe...@gmail.com wrote:
 Remember that what I wanted was to remove Dial-up Networking Support - it 
 is
 not expected that this operation should remove all Networking!

 Then what is it supposed to do instead?

 yum groupinfo 'Dial-up Networking Support' tells that ppp is a
 Mandatory Package in that group. If you wanted to remove ppp, you would
 need to remove everything that requires ppp. Do you understand that?

I agree that if I explicitly ask to remove ppp then yum is supposed to
remove dependencies.

What I don't understand is how naive the group commands are working.

If ppp is a member of two groups then it shouldn't be removed until both
groups are removed, no?

And for the other example :

 Not right. At least the font packages you've mentioned are part of
 that group:

 $ yum groupinfo 'Electronic Lab'|grep font
   xorg-x11-fonts-100dpi
   xorg-x11-fonts-ISO8859-1-100dpi
   xorg-x11-fonts-ISO8859-9-100dpi
   xorg-x11-fonts-Type1

Please don't tell me that having fonts as default packages in the
Electronic Lab makes sense - if a package in the Electronic Lab
group need fonts then that dependency should be handled in the
*package* dependency and not as group members.
-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines


Re: sudoku-savant

2011-06-13 Thread Steve Searle
Around 03:13pm on Monday, June 13, 2011 (UK time), Andrew Gray scrawled:

 Hi 
 
 sudoku-savant is far too small 9x9 on 1600x1200 screen it needs ability
 to resize the gui please 

Use bugzilla to request feature changes - the developers are unlikely to
see your email on this list.

Steve

-- 
 
Website:  www.stevesearle.com
Twitter:  @ReddishShift
Facebook: www.facebook.com/steve.searle

 15:47:31 up 10 days,  6:14,  1 user,  load average: 0.03, 0.06, 0.01


pgpB86Or3IlKV.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines


Genesi Efika MX netbook - opinions? (Maybe OT)

2011-06-13 Thread Zoltan Hoppar
HI Guys,

I have seen this little machine, and I would like to know from the
owners who are using it daily? What is the general opinion about it?
Is it capable to run at least Fedora F12-F13? Or webOS?

Thanks,
Zoltan

-- 
PGP:  06853DF7
-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines


Re: Genesi Efika MX netbook - opinions? (Maybe OT)

2011-06-13 Thread Alan Cox
On Mon, 13 Jun 2011 09:36:56 +0200
Zoltan Hoppar hopp...@gmail.com wrote:

 HI Guys,
 
 I have seen this little machine, and I would like to know from the
 owners who are using it daily? What is the general opinion about it?
 Is it capable to run at least Fedora F12-F13? Or webOS?

I thought all the Genesi devices were ARM based if so you'll need an ARM
distro with support for that specific board.

Alan

-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines


Re: gnome/XFCE desktop wallpaper problem - it won't stay!

2011-06-13 Thread BeartoothHOS
On Sun, 12 Jun 2011 23:23:35 -0700, Joe Zeff wrote:

 On 06/12/2011 08:53 AM, BeartoothHOS wrote:
  Did you start wallpapoz and not turn it off? It'll do that.
 
 I beg to differ.  I use wallpapoz on both my desktop and my laptop and
 haven't had the slightest difficulty because of it.

Do you have it set to show different backgrounds of different 
workspaces?

-- 
Beartooth Staffwright, Neo-Redneck Not Quite Clueless Power User
I have precious (very precious!) little idea where up is.


-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines


Re: git patch comments

2011-06-13 Thread Todd Zullinger
Michael Cronenworth wrote:
 That's how the git patches are created. If it is supposed to work then
 it is a bug because it is not working that way. I'll get this posted to
 the git list/bugzilla when I can. Thanks.

There isn't any git bugzilla, so just mailing the git list is the way
to go.  However, I'm still curious to see a git formatted patch that
is affected here.  I use git am regularly and have never seen this.

I just tested it by creating a commit message containing the following
text:

This is a test

Changes made:
- foo
- bar
- baz

I then use git format-patch -1, switched to a new branch and use git
am to apply this patch.  The formatting was correct.

-- 
ToddOpenPGP - KeyID: 0xBEAF0CE3 | URL: www.pobox.com/~tmz/pgp
~~
I do not believe in the collective wisdom of individual ignorance.
-- Thomas Carlyle



pgp1dDZVmTNAs.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines


Re: git patch comments

2011-06-13 Thread Michael Cronenworth
Todd Zullinger wrote:
 However, I'm still curious to see a git formatted patch that
 is affected here.  I use git am regularly and have never seen this.

I would post one, but they are proprietary.

I double checked the patches and indeed they are formatted as:

line 1
line 2
line 3

Testing the following formatting of:

line 1

line 2
line 3

results in the expected formatting. Slightly annoying behavior but 
easily worked around. Thanks.
-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines


Re: Genesi Efika MX netbook - opinions? (Maybe OT)

2011-06-13 Thread Itamar Reis Peixoto
On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 4:36 AM, Zoltan Hoppar hopp...@gmail.com wrote:
 HI Guys,

 I have seen this little machine, and I would like to know from the
 owners who are using it daily? What is the general opinion about it?
 Is it capable to run at least Fedora F12-F13? Or webOS?

 Thanks,
 Zoltan

 --
 PGP:  06853DF7


you should ask in fedora-arm mailing list.

yes, it works well with fedora-13, the people of panama loved my
presentation about fedora-arm in fudcon-panama

I think the people in fudcon-millan will talk about fedora-arm too.

I am using kernel + f13 image from Dennis Gilmore

http://ausil.us/smartbook/

I have both smartbook and smarttop and works very well.





Itamar Reis Peixoto
msn, google talk: ita...@ispbrasil.com.br
+55 11 4063 5033 (FIXO SP)
+55 34 9158 9329 (TIM)
+55 34 8806 3989 (OI)
+55 34 3221 8599 (FIXO MG)
-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines


Re: git patch comments

2011-06-13 Thread Bruno Wolff III
On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 10:32:59 -0500,
  Michael Cronenworth m...@cchtml.com wrote:
 
 I double checked the patches and indeed they are formatted as:
 
 line 1
 line 2
 line 3
 
 Testing the following formatting of:
 
 line 1
 
 line 2
 line 3
 
 results in the expected formatting. Slightly annoying behavior but 
 easily worked around. Thanks.

The lines before the first blank line are the subject. You need to have
that blank line if you add other comments.
-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines


Re: Is yum dependency resolution upside down?

2011-06-13 Thread Michael Schwendt
On Mon, 13 Jun 2011 22:40:09 +0800, KP wrote:

 I agree that if I explicitly ask to remove ppp then yum is supposed to
 remove dependencies.
 
 What I don't understand is how naive the group commands are working.

Well, if you want to go down that road, discussing this could reach a
sudden end. ;) Suggesting a different implemention is better taken to Yum
upstream's mailing-list.

Basically, groups are just lists of packages, with additional attributes
for the packages (such as mandatory, default, optional) to subdivide
them helpfully. A groupinstall is used to install a list of packages,
a groupremove is used to remove the same list of packages.

 If ppp is a member of two groups then it shouldn't be removed until both
 groups are removed, no?

IMO, that's a matter of definition. If you find ppp on your system, and
assuming [1] it is part of two groups, how to tell whether it was installed
due to installing group G1 or G2? And if ppp were not required by anything
else, why would it be wrong to remove it as part of G1 without specifying G2?
I mean, you asked to remove the packages from group G1, why imply that you
want to keep some of them due to another group they're in? Btw, you would see
the same dependencies when running plain yum remove ppp or rpm --erase ppp.

[1] ppp isn't part of two groups, is it?

 And for the other example :
 
  Not right. At least the font packages you've mentioned are part of
  that group:
 
  $ yum groupinfo 'Electronic Lab'|grep font
    xorg-x11-fonts-100dpi
    xorg-x11-fonts-ISO8859-1-100dpi
    xorg-x11-fonts-ISO8859-9-100dpi
    xorg-x11-fonts-Type1
 
 Please don't tell me that having fonts as default packages in the
 Electronic Lab makes sense - if a package in the Electronic Lab
 group need fonts then that dependency should be handled in the
 *package* dependency and not as group members.

You could raise that question on the Electronic Lab's list:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/electronic-lab

It could be that they consider these font packages worthwhile for their
spin, but without making any or all of the apps depend on all these
font packages. Along the same line, I could use Emacs with the fonts
as installed by the default Fedora Desktop spin, but I add xorg-x11-fonts-misc
nevertheless for the config files I use.
-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines


Burning Video DVD Howto

2011-06-13 Thread james tate
Fedora 15/Kde4 .

I have tried to burn burn a one hour videos using K3B

File  New Project  New Video Dvd Project , It creates a VIDEO_TS and 
AUDIO_TS , but if I  select a AVI or mp4 video to the Project, I get the 
following Error;

Could not determine size of resulting image file.

Is there a howto for k3b that explains this more in depth ?


-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines


Re: Is yum dependency resolution upside down?

2011-06-13 Thread Joe Zeff
On 06/13/2011 06:33 AM, Michael Schwendt wrote:
 On Mon, 13 Jun 2011 17:48:12 +0800, KP wrote:

 Remember that what I wanted was to remove Dial-up Networking Support - it 
 is
 not expected that this operation should remove all Networking!

 Then what is it supposed to do instead?


If you can install Networking without installing Dial-up Networking 
Support, you should be able to remove the latter without otherwise 
affecting the former.
-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines


Re: gnome/XFCE desktop wallpaper problem - it won't stay!

2011-06-13 Thread Joe Zeff
On 06/13/2011 08:10 AM, BeartoothHOS wrote:
   Do you have it set to show different backgrounds of different
 workspaces?

I was going to originally, but ended up with having all of them change 
backgrounds together but randomly.
-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines


Re: software time lock and web access control

2011-06-13 Thread Bruno Wolff III
On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 07:21:46 -0500,
  Javier Perez pepeb...@gmail.com wrote:
 
 I know maybe a combintion of IPTABLES and probably SQUID should do the
 trick, but

You can probably just use iptables and a cron job. iptables has a way to
check packets associated with particular users. So you should be able to
block common ports used for web traffic or all traffic not destined for the
local network for particular users.
-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines


Re: Adieu, Fedora

2011-06-13 Thread les
On Sun, 2011-06-12 at 20:04 -0700, James McKenzie wrote:
 el...
 
 I would love to see the folks in Redmond squirm.  Windows has so many 
 problems that it should be banned from anywhere where reliability is 
 key.  Go to your local hospital and see what they are running.  It 
 scares me that they are running WindowsXP/Vista/Seven on the front end 
 and WindowsServer on the back.  I would, from a security viewpoint, love 
 to see this replaced with Linux and running a secure UI program.  This 
 is easier on Linux than Windows...
 
 James McKenzie
Not only do I agree with this, but I recently purchased a new laptop for
work.  It came with Windows 7 Home Premium.  I then began bringing up
the utilities for my work.  The first one took two days to get working.
The second took 3 weeks, and I ended up having to go to the top version
of windows 7, an additional 100+US$.  I haven't upgraded to F15 yet, but
the other tools I use on a daily basis are all installed and working,
and the reload time to get everything going on F14 was 8 hours, not
counting the download time.  If you add the download time and the
upgrade time over DSL, it took a total of 23.5 hours.  I routinely use
over 30 applications on Linux, and only 6 on windows.  So guess which I
prefer.  

My Linux systems are still the best in my work, in my hobbies, and only
fall short in gaming, but mostly I haven't looked up any Linux gaming
sites, because I only really like one game, Age of Empires III, which I
play on Windows by dual booting my computer.

Regards,
Les H

-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines


Re: git patch comments

2011-06-13 Thread Todd Zullinger
Bruno Wolff III wrote:
 On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 10:32:59 -0500,
   Michael Cronenworth m...@cchtml.com wrote:

 I double checked the patches and indeed they are formatted as:

 line 1
 line 2
 line 3

 Testing the following formatting of:

 line 1

 line 2
 line 3

 results in the expected formatting. Slightly annoying behavior but
 easily worked around. Thanks.

 The lines before the first blank line are the subject. You need to
 have that blank line if you add other comments.

Indeed.  And if line1, line2 and line3 represent different changes,
they properly belong in seperate commits.  Since git lets you commit
locally and it's incredibly fast, the old habits of pushing multiple
disparate changes in one commit is a habit that should go away.

Git even makes it pretty easy to make a small series of changes to
various files, then add them as individual commits using 'git add -p'
and 'git rebase', among other methods.

-- 
ToddOpenPGP - KeyID: 0xBEAF0CE3 | URL: www.pobox.com/~tmz/pgp
~~
There are a thousand hacking at the branches of evil to one who is
striking at the root.
-- Henry David Thoreau



pgpmZMRBtvkLF.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines


Installing Tweetdeck - unsolvable?

2011-06-13 Thread Steven Stern
For the next person who might run into this

I've installed Adobe Air (yes, but let's not go there) from the adobe 
linux repo and now I'm trying to get it to install Tweetdeck.

The installation falls apart:  Here's a snippet from the install log:

Adobe AIR Application Installer:19463][INFO] Converting unpackaged 
application to a native installation package in /tmp/FlashTmp.mRNCss
[Adobe AIR Application Installer:19463][ERR] Native installation package 
creation failed: [ErrorEvent type=error bubbles=false cancelable=false 
eventPhase=2 text=Unhandled exception Error: Error creating the package 
/opt/Adobe AIR/Versions/1.0/Resources/rpmbuilder error : Could not load 
the library: librpmbuild.so, librpmbuild.so: cannot open shared object 
file: No such file or directory;

I don't have a librpmbuild.so file.  But there are these:

$ locate librpmbuild.so
/usr/lib/librpmbuild.so.2
/usr/lib/librpmbuild.so.2.0.0

The solution is to install the package rpm-devel?  Nope, because it 
fails later. The problem is that the Air installer is looking for an API 
call that no longer exists.  A bugzilla 
(https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=692381) indicates that 
that's just too bad.

I have reported the issue through Adobe's bug tracking system.


-- 
-- Steve
-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines


Re: Is yum dependency resolution upside down?

2011-06-13 Thread Michael Schwendt
On Mon, 13 Jun 2011 09:09:46 -0700, JZ wrote:

 On 06/13/2011 06:33 AM, Michael Schwendt wrote:
  On Mon, 13 Jun 2011 17:48:12 +0800, KP wrote:
 
  Remember that what I wanted was to remove Dial-up Networking Support - 
  it is
  not expected that this operation should remove all Networking!
 
  Then what is it supposed to do instead?
 
 
 If you can install Networking without installing Dial-up Networking 
 Support, you should be able to remove the latter without otherwise 
 affecting the former.

How would you install Networking?

-- 
$ yum grouplist|grep -i network
   Dial-up Networking Support
   Network Servers
   Legacy Network Server
-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines


Fedora 15 Doesn't started

2011-06-13 Thread Navdeep Singh Sidhu
I hv got a problem. I have purchased a dell studio laptop with these config.
i7 processor 2.2 GHZ boost up to 3.3
8 GB ram
2 GB nvidia 540m graphics card
Intel hd graphics card
750 GB hardisk.

so the main problem is when i boot fedora 15 it doesn't show any screen. i
have installed it on my portable seagate 500 GB hardisk. previously i had
used fedora 14 and fedora 13. they all boot well and worked fine. but fedora
15 don't show any screen after booting on my system. But on my brothers
laptop it works fine. May be it is a GNOME3 doesn't have support of my
graphics card or anything else. Can somebody help me? Please.


I have installed on my system via live usb but not on my laptop, by using
another laptop. First I created a live usb of Fedora 15 using Unetbootin.
then i tried to boot from it on my laptop. But shows an error

 - Dropping to debug shell.
 sh: can't access tty: job control turned off
 dracut:/#


as i had told you earlier. then i tried to boot the live usb on another
laptop that is HP pavilion dv 2700 with
-Intel Core 2 duo processor 1.8GHz
-2gb ram
-256Mb nividia geforce 8600 m graphics card.
-160 gb hardisk

fedora 15 live usb boots well on that system without any error and GNOME3
also supports it's hardware.
then i attached my portable hardisk to that system and started the
installation process. During the installation process i formatted my fedora
14 partition  install fedora 15 to it. Then i installed another Linux
distro backtrack5 to my portable hardisk on another partition by replacing
Ubuntu 10.10. Both these distro works fine on HP laptop but not on my dell.
fedora 15 doesn't show any screen after booting but Backtrack5 works
correctly. there is no problem with GRUB or any installation. I think it
doesn't support my laptop's hardware.
I had also tried to boot at run level 1, but it gives some Intel Mux call
failed error with

 - Dropping to debug shell.
  sh: can't access tty: job control turned off
  dracut:/#

thanks for help, I had tried to boot fedora 15 at run level 1,3,5. But no
one seems to work for me.

Please somebody help me i want to experience Fedora 15 on my laptop?

Regards
Navdeep Singh
-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines


Re: Fedora 15 Doesn't started

2011-06-13 Thread fedora
Is possibly the boot manager not correctly installed? Do you get any 
boot screen with kernel-name?
Otherwise, try to boot from your recovery/installation CD, go into 
recover and set up your boot manager.

suomi

On 2011-06-13 19:26, Navdeep Singh Sidhu wrote:
 I hv got a problem. I have purchased a dell studio laptop with these config.
 i7 processor 2.2 GHZ boost up to 3.3
 8 GB ram
 2 GB nvidia 540m graphics card
 Intel hd graphics card
 750 GB hardisk.

 so the main problem is when i boot fedora 15 it doesn't show any screen.
 i have installed it on my portable seagate 500 GB hardisk. previously i
 had used fedora 14 and fedora 13. they all boot well and worked fine.
 but fedora 15 don't show any screen after booting on my system. But on
 my brothers laptop it works fine. May be it is a GNOME3 doesn't have
 support of my graphics card or anything else. Can somebody help me?
 Please.


 I have installed on my system via live usb but not on my laptop, by
 using another laptop. First I created a live usb of Fedora 15 using
 Unetbootin. then i tried to boot from it on my laptop. But shows an error

   - Dropping to debug shell.
   sh: can't access tty: job control turned off
   dracut:/#
  

 as i had told you earlier. then i tried to boot the live usb on another
 laptop that is HP pavilion dv 2700 with
 -Intel Core 2 duo processor 1.8GHz
 -2gb ram
 -256Mb nividia geforce 8600 m graphics card.
 -160 gb hardisk

 fedora 15 live usb boots well on that system without any error and
 GNOME3 also supports it's hardware.
 then i attached my portable hardisk to that system and started the
 installation process. During the installation process i formatted my
 fedora 14 partition  install fedora 15 to it. Then i installed another
 Linux distro backtrack5 to my portable hardisk on another partition by
 replacing Ubuntu 10.10. Both these distro works fine on HP laptop but
 not on my dell. fedora 15 doesn't show any screen after booting but
 Backtrack5 works correctly. there is no problem with GRUB or any
 installation. I think it doesn't support my laptop's hardware.
 I had also tried to boot at run level 1, but it gives some Intel Mux
 call failed error with

   - Dropping to debug shell.
sh: can't access tty: job control turned off
dracut:/#

 thanks for help, I had tried to boot fedora 15 at run level 1,3,5. But
 no one seems to work for me.

 Please somebody help me i want to experience Fedora 15 on my laptop?

 Regards
 Navdeep Singh

-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines


Re: software time lock and web access control

2011-06-13 Thread Arthur Dent
On Mon, 2011-06-13 at 07:21 -0500, Javier Perez wrote:
 Hi
 Is there any easy to use and setup program to control web access for a
 user? also to set time of day allowed usage of certain programs?
 This for a home computer using Fedora 14.
 
 I know maybe a combintion of IPTABLES and probably SQUID should do the
 trick, but
 
 1. I want something easy to use and modify, not something that would
 force me to open the gusts of the system up.
 2. Likewise, I am not sure if I can block stuff on a user basis with
 IPTABLES and SQUID. As Far as I have read, whatever configuration I
 set up with them, will work the same for ALL Users.
 
 So far I just started studying this issue an I am just beginning my
 research, I just want to be pointed at on the right direction.
 
 In the end I know once kids learn enough they will be able to bypass
 all these walls, but I will deal with it when I reach that level...

Check out SquidGuard http://www.squidguard.org/

Available in the Fedora repos...

Quite easy to configure as long as you have squid running OK.




signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines


Re: gnome/XFCE desktop wallpaper problem - it won't stay!

2011-06-13 Thread BeartoothHOS
On Mon, 13 Jun 2011 09:14:09 -0700, Joe Zeff wrote:

 On 06/13/2011 08:10 AM, BeartoothHOS wrote:
  Do you have it set to show different backgrounds of different
 workspaces?
 
 I was going to originally, but ended up with having all of them change
 backgrounds together but randomly.

OK, that probably explains the difference. I do. When I grab a 
pic I want for a background, and then click a vacant workspace to take a 
look, it shows the new one for a few seconds, and then goes to the 
preset. When it first started doing that, I had forgotten I'd played with 
wallpapoz, and was thoroughly bewildered for a couple days.

-- 
Beartooth Staffwright, Neo-Redneck Not Quite Clueless Power User
I have precious (very precious!) little idea where up is.


-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines


Re: Adieu, Fedora

2011-06-13 Thread Alan Evans
On Sun, Jun 12, 2011 at 7:37 PM, David wrote:
 I disagree. He makes a very valid point. New installs of Windows always
 come up with a tutorial and helper app. I have never seen anything like
 that on Linux

 Really? Seriously?

 What New installs of Windows of Windows are you referring to? None
 that I have seen do this. Version numbers of Windows? Dates of install?
 I can't think of any.

I don't really have a horse in this race, but I remember such apps and
popups myself. And it didn't take me but ten seconds to google an
example:

http://techsalsa.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/12/take-tour-windows-xp.png

Arguments about the usefulness of this are perhaps in order, but to
argue that it didn't exist at all seems silly to me.

-Alan
-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines


Re: Fedora 15 Doesn't started

2011-06-13 Thread Timothy Murphy
Navdeep Singh Sidhu wrote:

 so the main problem is when i boot fedora 15 it doesn't show any screen.

It's not clear (to me, at least) precisely what you mean.
Does the grub screen come up, and you choose Fedora-15,
and then it goes wrong?
Or does nothing at all come up on the screen?

In any case, if it were me I'd download and burn a Fedora Live CD,
and see if that worked.

If that didn't work, I'd download and burn a Knoppix CD,
and look at the setup with that, in particular /boot/grub/grub.conf
(if nothing ever appears on the screen).


-- 
Timothy Murphy  
e-mail: gayleard /at/ eircom.net
tel: +353-86-2336090, +353-1-2842366
s-mail: School of Mathematics, Trinity College, Dublin 2, Ireland

-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines


Re: Is yum dependency resolution upside down?

2011-06-13 Thread Joe Zeff
On 06/13/2011 10:12 AM, Michael Schwendt wrote:
 How would you install Networking?

Well, I generally make sure that it's selected when I install Fedora. 
Checking, I find that there's a directory on this box, /etc/ppp so it 
must have been brought in with everything else.  However, I don't see 
why removing it would take out everything else in Networking.  I won't 
say that there's no good reason for it, but I will say that it's not 
clear to me why that would happen.  Does anybody on the list know?
-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines


Re: gnome/XFCE desktop wallpaper problem - it won't stay!

2011-06-13 Thread Joe Zeff
On 06/13/2011 11:16 AM, BeartoothHOS wrote:
 When it first started doing that, I had forgotten I'd played with
 wallpapoz, and was thoroughly bewildered for a couple days.

Email the maintainer.  I had trouble with it when I first switched from 
Gnome to XFCE, and he had a fix for it within a day or so.
-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines


Re: Adieu, Fedora

2011-06-13 Thread John Aldrich
On Sun June 12 2011, Stephen Bunn wrote:
 
 Seriously? You aren't really trying to argue the point that windows has
 better documentation than GNU/Linux.
 
 That and the *goal* shouldn't be who has the most users.  The *goal*
 should be a desktop that does what the user base needs it to do. The
 GNU/Linux user communities need to stop this nonsense of trying to
 compete with Windows and/or OS X.  Instead we should be focusing on
 building an operating system that works for the existing user base. If
 its good other people *will* learn it.

No, I think that Windows is just more user-friendly and does more hand-
holding than Linux. I think we need to get out of the mindset of we don't 
want 'everybody' using linux because then it wouldn't be cool. It often 
seems that's the attitude that a lot of people have, and I think we ought 
to be doing more to encourage joe 6pack to pick up a copy of Linux and 
install it over Windows.
-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines


Re: Adieu, Fedora

2011-06-13 Thread Marcus D. Leech
On 13/06/2011 3:01 PM, John Aldrich wrote:

 No, I think that Windows is just more user-friendly and does more hand-
 holding than Linux. I think we need to get out of the mindset of we don't
 want 'everybody' using linux because then it wouldn't be cool. It often
 seems that's the attitude that a lot of people have, and I think we ought
 to be doing more to encourage joe 6pack to pick up a copy of Linux and
 install it over Windows.
Well sure.  But let's not go down the path of lobotomizing it to the 
point where it has achieved
   glorified typewriter status.  Which is, I'm afraid, where most 
people's mindset is about computers
   in general, and Windows in particular.

If we make the system so stupid that it can't be used for further 
development of  the system, then we've
   failed gloriously.

It should never reach the point that the Fedora developer feels tempted 
to reach for something else, because
   the system he's developing for is inadequate for the task of developing.





-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines


Re: Is yum dependency resolution upside down?

2011-06-13 Thread Michael Schwendt
On Mon, 13 Jun 2011 11:47:49 -0700, JZ wrote:

  How would you install Networking?
 
 Well, I generally make sure that it's selected when I install Fedora. 

Really? Do you add/choose a particular package group for it? Or do you
visit potential groups in search for ppp and place a checkmark next to
ppp there?

Or do you rely on the default install to include PPP support?
As I've shown, there is no Networking group, but there is the
Dial-up Networking Support group.

 Checking, I find that there's a directory on this box, /etc/ppp so it 
 must have been brought in with everything else.  However, I don't see 
 why removing it would take out everything else in Networking.  I won't 
 say that there's no good reason for it, but I will say that it's not 
 clear to me why that would happen.  Does anybody on the list know?

That has been explained at the beginning of this thread.

$ repoquery --whatrequires ppp
ppp-0:2.4.5-17.fc15.x86_64
NetworkManager-1:0.8.999-2.git20110509.fc15.x86_64
NetworkManager-1:0.8.9997-2.git20110531.fc15.x86_64
NetworkManager-pptp-1:0.8.999-1.fc15.x86_64
bluemodem-0:0.7-6.fc15.x86_64
kdenetwork-7:4.6.2-2.fc15.x86_64
kdenetwork-7:4.6.3-1.fc15.x86_64
ppp-0:2.4.5-17.fc15.x86_64
pptp-0:1.7.2-12.fc15.x86_64
rp-pppoe-0:3.10-8.fc15.x86_64
synce-serial-0:0.11-5.fc15.x86_64
wvdial-0:1.61-4.fc15.x86_64
xfce4-modemlights-plugin-0:0.1.3.99-7.fc15.x86_64
xl2tpd-0:1.2.7-3.fc15.x86_64
-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines


Re: Adieu, Fedora

2011-06-13 Thread Kam Leo
On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 2:14 AM, Alan Cox a...@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk wrote:
 The point is, you have to match the distro to the user, not the other
 way around.  If the OP isn't happy with Fedora, I hope he finds a distro
 he likes better.

 The primary end user Linux UI is Android. In that sense the argument is
 over for the moment.

 Alan


I agree. Android is growing and has more eyeballs/users. Due to sheer
numbers it will become the de facto GUI.
-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines


Re: Adieu, Fedora

2011-06-13 Thread Patrick Bartek
--- On Sun, 6/12/11, Andras Simon sza...@gmail.com wrote:

 On 6/13/11, Patrick Bartek bartek...@yahoo.com
 wrote:
 
 [...]
 
  Considered XFCE and LXDE instead, but
  decided the best option was to abandon the Desktop GUI
 environment
  all-together in favor of a well-featured window
 manager, simple launch bar
  for most used apps, floating menus for the others, and
 a terminal or two.  I
  don't really need all the other crap.  Not even
 3D.
 
 Welcome to the club :-) I never understood what these
 desktop
 environments give mankind that a window manager doesn't.
 But then I
 never launch programs; they are either running all the
 time
 (Firefox, Emacs, c) or are started from the command
 line (mplayer,
 xpdf, ...). (I'm nevertheless using Xfce on a netbook,
 because I was
 too lazy to fight the system :-))
 
  My primary choice is Debian 6, 64-bit, and
 Openbox.  I've been testing both
  in VirtualBox for a few months.  So far, so
 good.
 
 I think the difference between running a distro virtualized
 and on
 your real computer is like the difference between dating
 someone and
 marrying her :-) But I hope it turns out well for you!

Running Debian in a VM was not for check system compatibility (That's already 
been done), but to experiment with doing a Base install and then adding and 
configuring the rest of the system piece by piece to gain the leanest, most 
efficient system without resorting to the Linux-From-Scatch approach.  After 
all, most of the hardware is at least 6 years old.  So, by today's standards, 
for a desktop, it's OLD, and I need it to maintain usability for another 2 to 3 
years.  At that time, I'll decide whether to build another or abandon the 
traditional box concept entirely.  
 
 Good luck,

Thanks.

B

-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines


Re: Adieu, Fedora

2011-06-13 Thread Patrick Bartek
--- On Sun, 6/12/11, Digimer li...@alteeve.com wrote:


 On 06/12/2011 06:08 PM, Patrick
 Bartek wrote:
  It's been a nice ride these past 7 years with Fedora
  as my primary OS, but it's time to move on.  My current
  [snip]
 
 Every distro exists to fit a niche. That Fedora is not the
 one for your 
 needs is fine, and I hope Debian 6 works well for you. As a
 former 
 Debian/Ubuntu user now on CentOS/RHEL and Fedora, I've
 moved around, too.
 
 The strength on Linux is the choice available to it's
 users.

One of the reasons I chose Linux 10 years ago when I switched from the Amiga.

B
-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines


Re: Adieu, Fedora

2011-06-13 Thread John Aldrich
On Mon June 13 2011, Marcus D. Leech wrote:
 
 Well sure.  But let's not go down the path of lobotomizing it to the
 point where it has achieved
glorified typewriter status.  Which is, I'm afraid, where most
 people's mindset is about computers
in general, and Windows in particular.
 
 If we make the system so stupid that it can't be used for further
 development of  the system, then we've
failed gloriously.
 
 It should never reach the point that the Fedora developer feels tempted
 to reach for something else, because
the system he's developing for is inadequate for the task of
 developing.

No, I would not advocate lobotomizing linux either. I just think it would 
be extremely helpful if we had  something similar to the tour that XP 
takes you on (if you let it) when you first install. Not to mention the 
helper that comes up when you're installing it and finishing the 
configuration.

I just think we need some n00b tools to help ease new users into Linux 
that advanced users can ignore or at least tell to go away. I mean, can 
you imagine handing some random person on the street a laptop with Fedora 
installed and saying here you go...  Most of them would probably have no 
idea what to do.
-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines


Re: Is yum dependency resolution upside down?

2011-06-13 Thread Joe Zeff
On 06/13/2011 12:20 PM, Michael Schwendt wrote:
 Really? Do you add/choose a particular package group for it? Or do you
 visit potential groups in search for ppp and place a checkmark next to
 ppp there?

 Or do you rely on the default install to include PPP support?
 As I've shown, there is no Networking group, but there is the
 Dial-up Networking Support group.

I have never, knowingly, installed it on this laptop.  I did, however, 
make sure that Networking Support was installed when I first installed 
Fedora 13.  Although I have used dial-up support under Linux, by the 
time I got this box I no longer had an account with ppp access, so I've 
never had a reason before to check for it.  How it came in I don't know, 
and I'm not interested in experimenting to find out if I can remove it 
without removing anything else.  I'm just mentioning that it's here.
-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines


Re: Adieu, Fedora

2011-06-13 Thread Joe Zeff
On 06/13/2011 12:25 PM, Patrick Bartek wrote:
 After all, most of the hardware is at least 6 years old.  So, by today's 
 standards, for a desktop, it's OLD, and I need it to maintain usability for 
 another 2 to 3 years.

The mobo and CPU on my main desktop box go back to '03, and I'm not in a 
position to consider an upgrade.  F14 works fine for me, although it's 
starting to slow down a tad as things get more memory intensive. (The 
biggest problem is that the mobo is maxed out at 1Gig, even though the 
chip can handle twice that.)  Of course, your needs are probably 
significantly different, and a merely 6 year old box may well be too 
old for you.
-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines


Current preupgrade?

2011-06-13 Thread BeartoothHOS

Some weeks ago, when preupgrade led or could lead to F15 Beta, I 
tried it and got royally snarled up. I never did get Gnome3 to boot 
properly on that machine, and finally installed Scientific Linux, which I 
also wanted to try. (I like it.)

I'm thinking I might want to try F15 again. I got a look at it 
with Gnome3 by running a live CD -- and didn't do very well. So I'd like 
also to be able to run Xfce instead of Gnome3. Is there a way to do that?
Alt-F2 to gnome-terminal to root to yum install xfce, maybe?
-- 
Beartooth Staffwright, Neo-Redneck Not Quite Clueless Power User
I have precious (very precious!) little idea where up is.


-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines


RE: Adieu, Fedora

2011-06-13 Thread Damian Rodriguez Sanchez


 

-
Visite o estande da Itautec no CIAB, maior evento de Tecnologiapara o 
setor financeiro, e conheça soluções inovadoras
15 a 17 de junho - Transamérica Expo Center - São Paulo - SP
Inscreva-se no site www.ciab.com.br

www.itautec.com.br
twitter.com/itautec
facebook.com/itautec
-

-Original Message-
 No, I would not advocate lobotomizing linux either. I just think it
 would
 be extremely helpful if we had  something similar to the tour that XP
 takes you on (if you let it) when you first install. Not to mention the
 helper that comes up when you're installing it and finishing the
 configuration.

Yes, and a cute little dog when you do a file search would be nice too!




0
-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines


nss_ldap + sssd for hostname resolution

2011-06-13 Thread Luc Lalonde
Hello Folks,

I can't seem to get a combination that was working with Fedora 13 to work with 
Fedora 15.

In Fedora 13 I would use these settings in /etc/nsswitch.conf:

hosts:  files dns ldap

And in /etc/ldap.conf:

nss_base_hosts  ou=Hosts,dc=foobar,dc=org?one

If I try to do this on Fedora 15, it doesn't work at all.   Is there a way to 
do this without having to install 'nss_ldap'?   I also would like to get the 
'netgroups' from LDAP... this was also working with Fedora 13.

As it is now, I'm using 'nis' as a workaround for these mappings when I should 
be doing it with 'ldap'.

Thank You!


-- 
Luc Lalonde, analyste
-
Département de génie informatique:
École polytechnique de Montréal
(514) 340-4711 x5049
luc.lalo...@polymtl.ca
-
-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines


Re: Adieu, Fedora

2011-06-13 Thread Patrick Bartek
--- On Sun, 6/12/11, Fernando Cassia fcas...@gmail.com wrote:

 Patrick Bartek bartek...@yahoo.com
 wrote:
  It's been a nice ride these past 7 years with Fedora
 as my primary OS, but it's time to move on.
 
 This reminds me of OS/2 users on oS/2 maling list who
 often  decided
 that not only they had to change OS, they had to write a
 long tirade
 telling others why they decided to leave, and why their
 once-favorite
 OS was doomed.
 
 As is sharing their grief with the rest of the community
 were of some
 use for anyone.

No grief.  No tirade.  No insults.  Just a polite good-bye and an explanation 
of why.  Any organization deserves at least that much from one of its members.

 I say: good riddance!

Why does my switching distros bother you so much that you need to resort to 
insults to slake that animosity?

B
-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines


OT: RE: Adieu, Fedora

2011-06-13 Thread Fred Erickson

 Yes, and a cute little dog when you do a file search would be nice too!
 

Speaking of cute little dogs...maybe someone should redo M$ Bob for
Linux...we could call it Linux Boob :-)

-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines


Re: nss_ldap + sssd for hostname resolution

2011-06-13 Thread Nalin Dahyabhai
On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 03:45:50PM -0400, Luc Lalonde wrote:
 Hello Folks,
 
 I can't seem to get a combination that was working with Fedora 13 to work 
 with Fedora 15.
 
 In Fedora 13 I would use these settings in /etc/nsswitch.conf:
 
 hosts:  files dns ldap

I really would recommend not doing that -- the LDAP client libraries
tend to depend on hostname resolution, so using them for hostname
resolution has often caused problems when 'files' or 'dns' couldn't come
up with an answer that was asked for while connecting to the directory
server.  In those cases, the nss_ldap module would then recurse into
itself.  If the host name resolution path involved taking a lock, the
process would get stuck, and if it didn't, it would encounter the same
problem and keep recursing until it crashed.

 And in /etc/ldap.conf:
 
 nss_base_hosts  ou=Hosts,dc=foobar,dc=org?one
 
 If I try to do this on Fedora 15, it doesn't work at all.   Is there a way to 
 do this without having to install 'nss_ldap'?   I also would like to get the 
 'netgroups' from LDAP... this was also working with Fedora 13.

If you're using nss-pam-ldapd, you'd want to put something like this in
your /etc/nslcd.conf and make sure the nslcd service is started:
  base hosts ou=Hosts,dc=foobar,dc=org?one

HTH,

Nalin
-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines


Re: Adieu, Fedora

2011-06-13 Thread Patrick Bartek
--- On Sun, 6/12/11, JD jd1...@gmail.com wrote:

 On 06/12/2011 03:08 PM, Patrick
 Bartek wrote:
  It's been a nice ride these past 7 years with Fedora
  as my primary OS, but it's time to move on.  My current
 
  [snip]

 As was stated in a recent response on this list, Fedora is
 always in 
 test mode, so
 will always change rapidly.
 
 You will find that Debian uses very old releases of kernel
 and user apps 
 and libs,
 thus much of the new advances are not available for it from
 it's vanilla 
 repos.

Not all that old.  I'm running kernel 2.6.32-5-amd64 on the Debian 6 VM, which 
I haven't checked lately to see if there's an update.  My current kernel for 
F12 is 2.6.32.26-175 64-bit.  Not that much difference.  Remember, my hardware 
is 6 years old.  Plus, I can always recompile.

 Also, if you are looking for support over many years, are
 you sure that 
 it is actively
 supported and new bugs fixed in this release version you
 have chosen?

One of the reasons I chose Debian.  Support usually lasts around 4 to 5 years 
for everything.  They just stopped support on Debian 4 this past February.  4 
was released April 2007.  So, 4 years.  A nice run.  All I'll need for now.

B
-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines


Re: nss_ldap + sssd for hostname resolution

2011-06-13 Thread Stephen Gallagher
On Mon, 2011-06-13 at 15:45 -0400, Luc Lalonde wrote:
 Hello Folks,
 
 I can't seem to get a combination that was working with Fedora 13 to
 work with Fedora 15.
 
 In Fedora 13 I would use these settings in /etc/nsswitch.conf:
 
 hosts:  files dns ldap
 
 And in /etc/ldap.conf:
 
 nss_base_hosts  ou=Hosts,dc=foobar,dc=org?one
 
 If I try to do this on Fedora 15, it doesn't work at all.   Is there a
 way to do this without having to install 'nss_ldap'?   I also would
 like to get the 'netgroups' from LDAP... this was also working with
 Fedora 13.
 

Fedora 15 switched to nss-pam-ldapd, which uses the /etc/nslcd.conf file
instead of /etc/ldap.conf (which was easy to confuse with the config
file for openldap).


SSSD now supports netgroups in Fedora 15, so you can just use
netgroups: files sss

We don't yet support the 'hosts' map, see
https://fedorahosted.org/sssd/ticket/359


 As it is now, I'm using 'nis' as a workaround for these mappings when I
 should be doing it with 'ldap'.
 
 Thank You!
 
 
 -- Luc Lalonde, analyste
 -
 Département de génie informatique: École polytechnique de Montréal
 (514) 340-4711 x5049 luc.lalo...@polymtl.ca
 -




signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines


Still some mysteie about FC15

2011-06-13 Thread Aaron Konstam
Well I was on vacation so I only installed FC15 today.
And some strange tings occurred.
1, The wiki pages on systemd say that chkconfig --less
does not work. That is not true. I know its a wiki and I can make
changes. Well maybe sometime.
2. The method for making the cursor's focus become active when you move
the cursor onto a window is well hidden. Why should that be. As far as I
can find the only  way to do that is to install gconf-editor and change 
/apps/metacity/general/focus_mode from clean to sloppy. That is not too
obvious. Does anyone  know another way to do it?
3. Someone needs to give the  Gnome3 people a lesson on instructional
videos. They go too fast so the use of workspaces and lining up 2 widows
next to each other  are still a mystery. Does anyone have better
explanation of these topics.
4. Why are things like gnotes not installed by default?

That is enough for now. I will keep working on it.
-- 
===
Sanity is the trademark of a weak mind. -- Mark Harrold
===
Aaron Konstam telephone: (210) 656-0355 e-mail: akons...@sbcglobal.net

-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines


Re: nss_ldap + sssd for hostname resolution

2011-06-13 Thread Nalin Dahyabhai
On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 04:00:45PM -0400, Nalin Dahyabhai wrote:
 If you're using nss-pam-ldapd, you'd want to put something like this in
 your /etc/nslcd.conf and make sure the nslcd service is started:
   base hosts ou=Hosts,dc=foobar,dc=org?one

Strike that.  It would actually be more like:
base hosts ou=Hosts,dc=foobar,dc=org
scope hosts one

Cheers,

Nalin
-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines


Re: Current preupgrade?

2011-06-13 Thread suvayu ali
On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 12:38 PM, BeartoothHOS bearto...@comcast.net wrote:
 yum install xfce

# yum groupinstall xfce

-- 
Suvayu

Open source is the future. It sets us free.
-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines


Re: Is yum dependency resolution upside down?

2011-06-13 Thread Michael Schwendt
On Mon, 13 Jun 2011 12:33:38 -0700, JZ wrote:

 I have never, knowingly, installed it on this laptop.  I did, however, 
 make sure that Networking Support was installed when I first installed 
 Fedora 13.  Although I have used dial-up support under Linux, by the 
 time I got this box I no longer had an account with ppp access, so I've 
 never had a reason before to check for it.  How it came in I don't know, 
 and I'm not interested in experimenting to find out if I can remove it 
 without removing anything else.  I'm just mentioning that it's here.

There you're pretty much off-topic. ;-)
-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines


Still some mysteries about FC15

2011-06-13 Thread Aaron Konstam

TO FIX A MANGLED SUBJECT LINE

Well I was on vacation so I only installed FC15 today.
And some strange tings occurred.
1, The wiki pages on systemd say that chkconfig --less
does not work. That is not true. I know its a wiki and I can make
changes. Well maybe sometime.
2. The method for making the cursor's focus become active when you move
the cursor onto a window is well hidden. Why should that be. As far as I
can find the only  way to do that is to install gconf-editor and change 
/apps/metacity/general/focus_mode from clean to sloppy. That is not too
obvious. Does anyone  know another way to do it?
3. Someone needs to give the  Gnome3 people a lesson on instructional
videos. They go too fast so the use of workspaces and lining up 2 widows
next to each other  are still a mystery. Does anyone have better
explanation of these topics.
4. Why are things like gnotes not installed by default?

That is enough for now. I will keep working on it.
-- 
===
Sanity is the trademark of a weak mind. -- Mark Harrold
===
Aaron Konstam telephone: (210) 656-0355 e-mail: akons...@sbcglobal.net

-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines

-- 
===
When among apes, one must play the ape.
===
Aaron Konstam telephone: (210) 656-0355 e-mail: akons...@sbcglobal.net

-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines


Re: Current preupgrade?

2011-06-13 Thread Ranjan Maitra
I have never had any success with preupgrade so have sworn off it.
Instead, I have used yum following the instructions at:

http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/YumUpgradeFaq#Fedora_14_-.3E_Fedora_15

It was effortless this last time around.

It appears, however, that you would like to use XFCE instead of G3. In
that case, why not do a clear install from the F15 LiveCD XFCE spin?

Many thanks and best wishes,
Ranjan


On Mon, 13 Jun 2011 14:38:18 -0500 BeartoothHOS bearto...@comcast.net
wrote:

 
   Some weeks ago, when preupgrade led or could lead to F15 Beta, I 
 tried it and got royally snarled up. I never did get Gnome3 to boot 
 properly on that machine, and finally installed Scientific Linux, which I 
 also wanted to try. (I like it.)
 
   I'm thinking I might want to try F15 again. I got a look at it 
 with Gnome3 by running a live CD -- and didn't do very well. So I'd like 
 also to be able to run Xfce instead of Gnome3. Is there a way to do that?
 Alt-F2 to gnome-terminal to root to yum install xfce, maybe?
 -- 
 Beartooth Staffwright, Neo-Redneck Not Quite Clueless Power User
 I have precious (very precious!) little idea where up is.
 
 
 -- 
 users mailing list
 users@lists.fedoraproject.org
 To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
 Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
 
-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines


Re: Still some mysteie about FC15

2011-06-13 Thread Michael Schwendt
On Mon, 13 Jun 2011 15:14:56 -0500, AK wrote:

 Well I was on vacation so I only installed FC15 today.
 And some strange tings occurred.
 1, The wiki pages on systemd say that chkconfig --less
 does not work. That is not true. I know its a wiki and I can make
 changes. Well maybe sometime.

--less? Do you mean --list? If so, the latter really isn't accurate.
It even warns about that:

Note: This output shows SysV services only and does not include native
  systemd services. SysV configuration data might be overridden by native
  systemd configuration.

 2. The method for making the cursor's focus become active when you move
 the cursor onto a window is well hidden. Why should that be. As far as I
 can find the only  way to do that is to install gconf-editor and change 
 /apps/metacity/general/focus_mode from clean to sloppy. That is not too
 obvious. Does anyone  know another way to do it?

Not yet.

$ gconftool-2 --set -t bool /apps/metacity/general/auto_raise true
$ gconftool-2 --set -t int /apps/metacity/general/auto_raise_delay 700
$ gconftool-2 --set -t string /apps/metacity/general/focus_mode mouse
  (defaults to click)

 3. Someone needs to give the  Gnome3 people a lesson on instructional
 videos. They go too fast so the use of workspaces and lining up 2 widows
 next to each other  are still a mystery. Does anyone have better
 explanation of these topics.

I click'n'hold a window's title bar and move the mouse pointer against the
screen's left or right border. The 50% area the window will take, if I
release the mouse button, is displayed on the screen with a blue overlay.

 4. Why are things like gnotes not installed by default?

gnote? Can't answer that. Probably it isn't integrated well with the GNOME 
Shell yet.
-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines


Re: Is yum dependency resolution upside down?

2011-06-13 Thread Joe Zeff
On 06/13/2011 01:19 PM, Michael Schwendt wrote:
 There you're pretty much off-topic. ;-)

Not quite.  My thinking is that if it comes in with the rest of 
Networking, there's a reason, even if I don't know what it is.  For all 
I know it might simply be that that's how it was set up back when most 
people only had dial-up service and that nobody's bothered to change it 
because it doesn't take up enough room to worry about.  And, if so, that 
might explain why taking it out takes our the rest of Network Services: 
nobody's thought to take a look at it and see if that still makes sense.
-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines


Re: NetworkManager cannot connect automatically to hidden network. nm-applet shows *really* big icons

2011-06-13 Thread Andrew Parker
On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 10:56 AM, Joshua C. joshua...@googlemail.com wrote:
 After upgrading to f15 the nm-applet cannot automatically connect to
 hidden wlan networks. It sees them and I can connect to them manually.
 The connect automatically checkbox is clicked.

 Another problem is that the nm-applet looks really awkward. As you can
 see from the attached screenshot the icons are *really* big. Maybe
 this is connected to gtk or other graphical manager. Has anyone else
 seen this problem on kde? Should I file a bug report?

I get this on KDE too.  I also get the icon on the system tray is
blank.  There is space for it and if I click on it I get the menu, but
its not always there.
-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines


Re: Default browser problem -

2011-06-13 Thread Tim Evans

 Something's seriously broken and changing the default apps just doesn't
 work consistently. This applies throughout the Gnome3 shell. You need
 to edit ~/.thunderbird/yourprofile/ and edit mimeTypes.rdf:

 Find and edit the stanzas referencing firefox. The should be for http,
 https, and ftp.


 As I noted in the other thread on this topic, this did not resolve my
 problem. Matter of fact, my laptop running F15 using the very same rdf
 file fails to open any browser from Thunderbird

 Same problem here, only on F14 with Tbird 5 beta 1.

As an additional data point (I think the something's seriously broken 
statement has some truth to it), I removed Chrome altogether from my 
system, leaving FireFox as the only browser.  After re-starting 
Thunderbird, clicking on links in it does nothing at all--FireFox is not 
invoked.

Thunderbird's error console reports:

Error: uncaught exception: [Exception... Component returned failure 
code: 0x80004005 (NS_ERROR_FAILURE) 
[nsIExternalProtocolService.loadUrl]  nsresult: 0x80004005 
(NS_ERROR_FAILURE)  location: JS frame :: 
chrome://communicator/content/contentAreaClick.js :: openLinkExternally 
:: line 188  data: no]

Don't understand this completely, but it seems clear it tried to open 
Chrome.

Re-installing Chrome reverts to previously reported behavior--all links 
in Thunderbird open Chrome, not FireFox.

-- 
Tim Evans, TKEvans.com, Inc.|   5 Chestnut Court
UNIX System Admin Consulting|   Owings Mills, MD 21117
http://www.tkevans.com/ |   443-394-3864
http://www.come-here.com/News/  |   tkev...@tkevans.com
-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines


Re: Still some mysteie about FC15

2011-06-13 Thread Aaron Konstam
On Mon, 2011-06-13 at 22:29 +0200, Michael Schwendt wrote:
  Well I was on vacation so I only installed FC15 today.
  And some strange tings occurred.
  1, The wiki pages on systemd say that chkconfig --less
  does not work. That is not true. I know its a wiki and I can make
  changes. Well maybe sometime.
 
 --less? Do you mean --list? If so, the latter really isn't accurate.
 It even warns about that: 

I did mean chkconfig --list
That works on my machine. Are you saying it does not?
-- 
===
Man usually avoids attributing cleverness to somebody else -- unless it
is an enemy. -- Albert Einstein
===
Aaron Konstam telephone: (210) 656-0355 e-mail: akons...@sbcglobal.net

-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines


Re: Is yum dependency resolution upside down?

2011-06-13 Thread Michael Schwendt
On Mon, 13 Jun 2011 13:44:45 -0700, JZ wrote:

 On 06/13/2011 01:19 PM, Michael Schwendt wrote:
  There you're pretty much off-topic. ;-)
 
 Not quite.  My thinking is that if it comes in with the rest of 
 Networking, there's a reason, even if I don't know what it is.  For all 
 I know it might simply be that that's how it was set up back when most 
 people only had dial-up service and that nobody's bothered to change it 
 because it doesn't take up enough room to worry about.  And, if so, that 
 might explain why taking it out takes our the rest of Network Services: 
 nobody's thought to take a look at it and see if that still makes sense.

Now you only repeat [albeit with many words] what has been explained
before. Do I need to repeat that package ppp is a dependency of
NetworkManager and that by removing ppp you need to remove
NetworkManager, too?

$ repoquery --whatrequires ppp
ppp-0:2.4.5-17.fc15.x86_64
NetworkManager-1:0.8.999-2.git20110509.fc15.x86_64
NetworkManager-1:0.8.9997-2.git20110531.fc15.x86_64
NetworkManager-pptp-1:0.8.999-1.fc15.x86_64
bluemodem-0:0.7-6.fc15.x86_64
kdenetwork-7:4.6.2-2.fc15.x86_64
kdenetwork-7:4.6.3-1.fc15.x86_64
ppp-0:2.4.5-17.fc15.x86_64
pptp-0:1.7.2-12.fc15.x86_64
rp-pppoe-0:3.10-8.fc15.x86_64
synce-serial-0:0.11-5.fc15.x86_64
wvdial-0:1.61-4.fc15.x86_64
xfce4-modemlights-plugin-0:0.1.3.99-7.fc15.x86_64
xl2tpd-0:1.2.7-3.fc15.x86_64
-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines


Re: Adieu, Fedora

2011-06-13 Thread John Aldrich
On Mon June 13 2011, Dave Ihnat wrote:
 
 We need to get more beginner docco out there--and get it to people. 
 Maybe downloading a Linux distro results in an E-Mail to the user with
 a link to How Linux is Different from Windows--which is a video, and
 a text document, and maybe a downloadable E-Book--that describes what
 they're going to see, and how to do the same things in Linux they
 commonly have to do in Windows, and how to solve common installation
 problems--and avoids fanboi/religious rants while doing so.  (No, this
 doesn't exist, AFAIK).
 
That's a VERY good idea... maybe even have a beginner's setup and an 
advanced user setup where the beginner setup asks things like what's 
your email address and automatically sets up a default email client for 
them so they can *receive* the email. :D
-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines


Re: Is yum dependency resolution upside down?

2011-06-13 Thread Matthew Saltzman
On Mon, 2011-06-13 at 23:02 +0200, Michael Schwendt wrote: 
 On Mon, 13 Jun 2011 13:44:45 -0700, JZ wrote:
 
  On 06/13/2011 01:19 PM, Michael Schwendt wrote:
   There you're pretty much off-topic. ;-)
  
  Not quite.  My thinking is that if it comes in with the rest of 
  Networking, there's a reason, even if I don't know what it is.  For all 
  I know it might simply be that that's how it was set up back when most 
  people only had dial-up service and that nobody's bothered to change it 
  because it doesn't take up enough room to worry about.  And, if so, that 
  might explain why taking it out takes our the rest of Network Services: 
  nobody's thought to take a look at it and see if that still makes sense.
 
 Now you only repeat [albeit with many words] what has been explained
 before. Do I need to repeat that package ppp is a dependency of
 NetworkManager and that by removing ppp you need to remove
 NetworkManager, too?

That's a feature of dependency analysis: NetworkManager expects to be
able to control ppp connections.  In order to do that, it needs ppp. So
if you remove ppp, NetworkManager thinks it is itself broken.  But if
you never intend to use NetworkManager to control ppp connections, it
would seem that you could install NetworkManager without installing ppp.
It would never break if you never ask it to do that.

But there's no easy way to manage these sorts of conditional
dependencies.  So the simple solution is to just install all the
software that NetworkManager thinks it needs to run under all use cases.
After all, if you never use that feature, the only drawback is a tiny
amount of wasted disk space (and maybe some minor annoyance on the part
of package purists 8^).

 
 $ repoquery --whatrequires ppp
 ppp-0:2.4.5-17.fc15.x86_64
 NetworkManager-1:0.8.999-2.git20110509.fc15.x86_64
 NetworkManager-1:0.8.9997-2.git20110531.fc15.x86_64
 NetworkManager-pptp-1:0.8.999-1.fc15.x86_64
 bluemodem-0:0.7-6.fc15.x86_64
 kdenetwork-7:4.6.2-2.fc15.x86_64
 kdenetwork-7:4.6.3-1.fc15.x86_64
 ppp-0:2.4.5-17.fc15.x86_64
 pptp-0:1.7.2-12.fc15.x86_64
 rp-pppoe-0:3.10-8.fc15.x86_64
 synce-serial-0:0.11-5.fc15.x86_64
 wvdial-0:1.61-4.fc15.x86_64
 xfce4-modemlights-plugin-0:0.1.3.99-7.fc15.x86_64
 xl2tpd-0:1.2.7-3.fc15.x86_64
 

-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines


Re: Current preupgrade?

2011-06-13 Thread BeartoothHOS
On Mon, 13 Jun 2011 13:19:11 -0700, suvayu ali wrote:

 yum groupinstall xfce

Done, with thanks. Stay tuned.



-- 
Beartooth Staffwright, Neo-Redneck Not Quite Clueless Power User
I have precious (very precious!) little idea where up is.


-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines


Re: Is yum dependency resolution upside down?

2011-06-13 Thread Joe Zeff
On 06/13/2011 02:02 PM, Michael Schwendt wrote:
 Now you only repeat [albeit with many words] what has been explained
 before. Do I need to repeat that package ppp is a dependency of
 NetworkManager and that by removing ppp you need to remove
 NetworkManager, too?

No, I'm not repeating what's been said before; I'm suggesting an 
*explanation* for this behaviour, which is more than anybody else has 
even tried.
-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines


ltsp fedora 14

2011-06-13 Thread François Patte
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Bonsoir,

I need to install thin clients with fedora 14, It seems that ltsp
disappeared from fedora

Where can I find rpm of ltsp compatible with f14?

Thank you.

F.P.

- --
François Patte
UFR de mathématiques et informatique
Université Paris Descartes
45, rue des Saints Pères
F-75270 Paris Cedex 06
Tél. +33 (0)1 8394 5849
http://www.math-info.univ-paris5.fr/~patte
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/

iEYEARECAAYFAk32f8IACgkQdE6C2dhV2JUipwCffVhsoOgtSg3tuvZPzYEUmHUW
iZIAoMrNpbcvIyTWq8lqx5q5N4u1rGoN
=iVGY
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines


Re: Printer still not working with LibreOffice, etc.

2011-06-13 Thread Christopher A. Williams
On Mon, 2011-06-13 at 12:29 +0200, Antonio M wrote: 
 2011/6/13 Lawrence E Graves lgra...@risingstarmbc.com:
  Fedora 15 is still flushing my printer.
  --
  Lawrence E Graves lgra...@risingstarmbc.com
 
 
 
 a lot of informations from your post ;-)
 I doubt that anybody can help youat least make and model of
 printer, I suggest

Actually - I had an offline conversation with the OP.

This is a legitimate issue. He has a printer (I believe a Brother MFC
series - don't remember which), that has been configured on F15 x86-64
on a USB port. Launching a test print job from from the Printer
Configuration applet produces a properly formatted test page.

Attempting to open and print a document from LibreOffice does nothing.
According to the system messages, the print job clearly spools to the
print queue, but the printer seems to be just flushing the print job and
doing nothing, but it is apparently not returning any errors other than
a Successfully Printed message (which, clearly did not happen).

I would hazard to guess that, since printing from LibreOffice to my HP
OfficeJet 6500 series printer works, that this issue may be with the way
LibreOffice and the Brother Print drivers are (not) working together.

Just a thought anyway.

Cheers,

Chris

-- 

==
Only two things are infinite,
the universe and human stupidity,
and I'm not sure about the former.

-- Albert Einstein




-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines


Re: Is yum dependency resolution upside down?

2011-06-13 Thread Joe Zeff
On 06/13/2011 02:18 PM, Matthew Saltzman wrote:
 That's a feature of dependency analysis: NetworkManager expects to be
 able to control ppp connections.  In order to do that, it needs ppp. So
 if you remove ppp, NetworkManager thinks it is itself broken.  But if
 you never intend to use NetworkManager to control ppp connections, it
 would seem that you could install NetworkManager without installing ppp.
 It would never break if you never ask it to do that.

Thank you; asked and answered.  I'd prefer to have Network Services be a 
dependency of ppp rather than the other way around, but as we both point 
out, the space involved is trivial.
-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines


Re: Printer still not working with LibreOffice, etc.

2011-06-13 Thread Steven Stern
On 06/13/2011 04:31 PM, Christopher A. Williams wrote:
 On Mon, 2011-06-13 at 12:29 +0200, Antonio M wrote:
 2011/6/13 Lawrence E Graveslgra...@risingstarmbc.com:
 Fedora 15 is still flushing my printer.
 --
 Lawrence E Graveslgra...@risingstarmbc.com



 a lot of informations from your post ;-)
 I doubt that anybody can help youat least make and model of
 printer, I suggest

 Actually - I had an offline conversation with the OP.

 This is a legitimate issue. He has a printer (I believe a Brother MFC
 series - don't remember which), that has been configured on F15 x86-64
 on a USB port. Launching a test print job from from the Printer
 Configuration applet produces a properly formatted test page.

 Attempting to open and print a document from LibreOffice does nothing.
 According to the system messages, the print job clearly spools to the
 print queue, but the printer seems to be just flushing the print job and
 doing nothing, but it is apparently not returning any errors other than
 a Successfully Printed message (which, clearly did not happen).

 I would hazard to guess that, since printing from LibreOffice to my HP
 OfficeJet 6500 series printer works, that this issue may be with the way
 LibreOffice and the Brother Print drivers are (not) working together.

 Just a thought anyway.

 Cheers,

 Chris

I suppose a workaround would be to export as PDF then print from the PDF 
app, but that really stinks.  I had issues with libreOffice crashing 
when trying to print, but some update recently seems to have fixed that.

-- 
-- Steve
-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines


Re: NetworkManager cannot connect automatically to hidden network. nm-applet shows *really* big icons

2011-06-13 Thread Joshua C.
2011/6/13 Andrew Parker andrewpar...@bigfoot.com:
 On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 10:56 AM, Joshua C. joshua...@googlemail.com wrote:
 After upgrading to f15 the nm-applet cannot automatically connect to
 hidden wlan networks. It sees them and I can connect to them manually.
 The connect automatically checkbox is clicked.

 Another problem is that the nm-applet looks really awkward. As you can
 see from the attached screenshot the icons are *really* big. Maybe
 this is connected to gtk or other graphical manager. Has anyone else
 seen this problem on kde? Should I file a bug report?

 I get this on KDE too.  I also get the icon on the system tray is
 blank.  There is space for it and if I click on it I get the menu, but
 its not always there.
 --
 users mailing list
 users@lists.fedoraproject.org
 To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
 Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines


I'll test with the lastest
NetworkManager-0.8.9997-3.git20110613.fc15.x86_64 and see if this has
been fixed. According to the changelog - core: fix automatic handling
of hidden WiFi networks (rh #707406) at least the first problem
should have been fixed. I've also copied the maintainer of the
package.
-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines


Re: Still some mysteries about FC15

2011-06-13 Thread Antonio Olivares
Aaron, 

--- On Mon, 6/13/11, Aaron Konstam akons...@sbcglobal.net wrote:

 From: Aaron Konstam akons...@sbcglobal.net
 Subject: Still some mysteries about FC15
 To: users users@lists.fedoraproject.org
 Date: Monday, June 13, 2011, 1:22 PM
 
 TO FIX A MANGLED SUBJECT LINE

 3. Someone needs to give the  Gnome3 people a lesson
 on instructional
 videos. They go too fast so the use of workspaces and
 lining up 2 widows
 next to each other  are still a mystery. Does anyone
 have better
 explanation of these topics.

``lining up 2 widows`` for who?  2 widows, I would bet that you meant windows 
right?   You can set one running program and with the mouse move it to the left 
till you can see it going to the middle and then you can do something similarly 
with another program in another windows but to the right and have two windows 
side by side. :)  This is what you mean right?


They do this so we can switch between two applications quickly and/or view two 
things at once?, others can share more.  I don't have too many windows open at 
once :( 

 That is enough for now. I will keep working on it.
 -- 

Regards,

Antonio 
-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines


Re: Adieu, Fedora

2011-06-13 Thread suvayu ali
On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 5:36 AM, Dave Ihnat dih...@dminet.com wrote:
 We need to get more beginner docco out there--and get it to people.  Maybe
 downloading a Linux distro results in an E-Mail to the user with a link to
 How Linux is Different from Windows--which is a video, and a text
 document, and maybe a downloadable E-Book--that describes what they're
 going to see, and how to do the same things in Linux they commonly have to
 do in Windows, and how to solve common installation problems--and avoids
 fanboi/religious rants while doing so.  (No, this doesn't exist, AFAIK).


file:///usr/share/doc/HTML/fedora-release-notes/en-US/index.html

or,

file:///usr/share/doc/HTML/fedora-release-notes/your_lang_env/index.html

Isn't this easy to follow? Maybe there could be a one time splash
screen reminding a new user on first login that the documentation is
already on their system.

-- 
Suvayu

Open source is the future. It sets us free.
-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines


Re: F12 -- F14 upgrade unsuccessful

2011-06-13 Thread Kevin J. Cummings
On 06/11/2011 02:43 PM, Andrew Jamison wrote:
 I have heard if you plan to upgrade in this manner it is best to upgrade from 
 f12 to f13 then from 13 - 14 due to the rapid change in technologies from f12 
 to f14 but again this just what I have heard not sure if this is actually the 
 case

According to my yum logs, I upgraded F11 to F12 on my laptop in April of 
2010.  Then, in November, I upgraded directly from F12 to F14.  I 
probably used pre-upgrade for both upgrades.  My laptop is now a 
doorstop (I need a new one), so I can't verify much beyond looking at my 
old logs.

As I recall, I couldn't go direct from F11 to F13 without the 
intermediate step of F12.  Previous to F11, I had been running F9. 
Previous to that my laptop came with FC6 installed.

-- 
Kevin J. Cummings
kjch...@rcn.com
cummi...@kjchome.homeip.net
cummi...@kjc386.framingham.ma.us
Registered Linux User #1232 (http://counter.li.org)
-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines


Should Gnome 3 implement WPAD, or not?

2011-06-13 Thread Sam Varshavchik

I have WPAD configured on my LAN.

Configuring Firefox to Auto-detect proxy settings correctly picks up my  
WPAD-designated proxy in Firefox. I can confirm that Firefox is loading my  
proxy settings, and is using them properly.


However, as far as I can tell, libproxy does absolutely nothing. In F15's  
Network Settings, I have the Proxy method set to Automatic with a blank  
URL. According to the description below the prompt, I'm let to believe that  
this should result in Gnome picking up my WPAD configuration file. As best  
as I can determine that's what Web Proxy Autodiscover is used when a  
Configuration URL is not provided means.


However, the proxy CLI tool returns direct:// for every URL. Looking into  
the libproxy package, it looks like native libproxy support for WPAD has  
been ripped out in F15, and replaced with a hook to retrieve the proxy  
settings from Gnome. And, as I said, I get direct:// for any URL. As far  
as I can tell, Gnome is ignoring my WPAD completely.


Has anyone gotten WPAD working correctly in F15/Gnome 3?I looked at the hits  
for wpad.dat on my web server. I see the hits, but all of them carry  
Firefox's user agent string. I see no hits on wpad.dat that I can attribute  
to Gnome retrieving it.


Can anyone confirm if:

* you can demonstrate that you have Gnome 3 picking up your WPAD settings, or

* whether the blurb in the network proxy settings indicates something other  
than WPAD




pgpt8nmmAqfj9.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines


Re: Adieu, Fedora

2011-06-13 Thread Tom H
On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 4:02 PM, Patrick Bartek bartek...@yahoo.com wrote:

 Not all that old. I'm running kernel 2.6.32-5-amd64 on the Debian 6 VM, which
 I haven't checked lately to see if there's an update. My current kernel for 
 F12
 is 2.6.32.26-175 64-bit. Not that much difference. Remember, my hardware
 is 6 years old. Plus, I can always recompile.

For pure Debian 6, you'll have 2.6.32 until Debian 7's released in
the same way that RHEL 6 and Ubuntu 10.04 are pegged to 2.6.32 for
their lifetimes.

If you want a newer kernel (or newer anything else), you can either
use the backport repositories or enable the testing/unstable ones
(unless you want to recompile).
-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines


Re: Still some mysteries about FC15

2011-06-13 Thread Rahul Sundaram
On 06/14/2011 01:52 AM, Aaron Konstam wrote:FC15 today.
 1, The wiki pages on systemd say that chkconfig --less
 does not work. That is not true. I know its a wiki and I can make
 changes. Well maybe sometime.

Please be more specific.

 4. Why are things like gnotes not installed by default?

You mean Gnote?  It needs to ported to GTK 3 and integrate better with
the shell

Rahul
-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines


Re: Still some mysteie about FC15

2011-06-13 Thread Rahul Sundaram
On 06/14/2011 02:31 AM, Aaron Konstam wrote:
 On Mon, 2011-06-13 at 22:29 +0200, Michael Schwendt wrote:
 Well I was on vacation so I only installed FC15 today.
 And some strange tings occurred.
 1, The wiki pages on systemd say that chkconfig --less
 does not work. That is not true. I know its a wiki and I can make
 changes. Well maybe sometime.
 --less? Do you mean --list? If so, the latter really isn't accurate.
 It even warns about that: 
 I did mean chkconfig --list
 That works on my machine. Are you saying it does not?

Where exactly in the wiki does it say it won't work? 

Rahul

-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines


Re: Adieu, Fedora

2011-06-13 Thread john wendel
On 06/13/2011 12:21 PM, Kam Leo wrote:
 On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 2:14 AM, Alan Coxa...@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk  wrote:
 The point is, you have to match the distro to the user, not the other
 way around.  If the OP isn't happy with Fedora, I hope he finds a distro
 he likes better.

 The primary end user Linux UI is Android. In that sense the argument is
 over for the moment.

 Alan


 I agree. Android is growing and has more eyeballs/users. Due to sheer
 numbers it will become the de facto GUI.


So, how do I get it as my Fedora desktop on my Intel/AMD based PC?

John

-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines


After logging out in gnome3 or xfce, I still see some of the user's processes

2011-06-13 Thread Joachim Backes
If a user runs a gnome3 or xfce session and then logs out, not all
processes are killed. I see at least pulseaudio running.

The most processes I saw after having logged out, were:

 9371 ?00:00:00 menu-cached
12441 ?00:00:00 pulseaudio
12448 ?00:00:00 gconf-helper
12592 ?00:00:00 gnome-keyring-d

Somebody sees this too?

Kind regards

-- 
Joachim Backes joachim.bac...@rhrk.uni-kl.de

http://www.rhrk.uni-kl.de/~backes



smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines


weird behaviour of gnome-terminal in xfce or LXDE sessions

2011-06-13 Thread Joachim Backes
After choosing xfce or LXDE as my favorite desktop and logging in and
then starting gnome-terminal, I see a weird effect: gnome-terminal is
popped up in a normal size, but then the width shrinks automatically and
slowly to about the half width. How to get rid of this behaviour?
This happens even width freshly created users.

All comments are welcome.

Kind regards
-- 
Joachim Backes joachim.bac...@rhrk.uni-kl.de

http://www.rhrk.uni-kl.de/~backes



smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines


Re: After logging out in gnome3 or xfce, I still see some of the user's processes

2011-06-13 Thread Ed Greshko
On 06/14/2011 01:32 PM, Joachim Backes wrote:
 If a user runs a gnome3 or xfce session and then logs out, not all
 processes are killed. I see at least pulseaudio running.

 The most processes I saw after having logged out, were:

  9371 ?00:00:00 menu-cached
 12441 ?00:00:00 pulseaudio
 12448 ?00:00:00 gconf-helper
 12592 ?00:00:00 gnome-keyring-d

 Somebody sees this too?


Well, I see it...and then I don't..

After logout these processes hang around for maybe 15~30 seconds after
the login screen is presented.
But do go away

Do yours remain?
-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines


Re: weird behaviour of gnome-terminal in xfce or LXDE sessions

2011-06-13 Thread Ed Greshko
On 06/14/2011 01:38 PM, Joachim Backes wrote:
 After choosing xfce or LXDE as my favorite desktop and logging in and
 then starting gnome-terminal, I see a weird effect: gnome-terminal is
 popped up in a normal size, but then the width shrinks automatically and
 slowly to about the half width. How to get rid of this behaviour?
 This happens even width freshly created users.

 All comments are welcome.


Same thing happens here.  But, quickly...not slowly.  I don't know how
to fix it...but sounds like candidate for a bugzilla.

-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines


Re: After logging out in gnome3 or xfce, I still see some of the user's processes

2011-06-13 Thread Joachim Backes
On 06/14/2011 07:41 AM, Ed Greshko wrote:
 On 06/14/2011 01:32 PM, Joachim Backes wrote:
 If a user runs a gnome3 or xfce session and then logs out, not all
 processes are killed. I see at least pulseaudio running.

 The most processes I saw after having logged out, were:

  9371 ?00:00:00 menu-cached
 12441 ?00:00:00 pulseaudio
 12448 ?00:00:00 gconf-helper
 12592 ?00:00:00 gnome-keyring-d

 Somebody sees this too?

 
 Well, I see it...and then I don't..
 
 After logout these processes hang around for maybe 15~30 seconds after
 the login screen is presented.
 But do go away
 
 Do yours remain?

1. pulseaudio and gconf-helper disappear after about 30 secs
2. gnome-keyring-daemon and menu-cached remain. It seems they are immune
against logout.

Kind regards

-- 
Joachim Backes joachim.bac...@rhrk.uni-kl.de

http://www.rhrk.uni-kl.de/~backes



smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines


  1   2   >