Re: Network Manage your network connections
Hello Martin, Abusively I did throw away the upper panel , I reinstalled it and with the Add to panel utility I installed the needed apps like network speed , brightnes , updates etc. The nm-network applet to manage your network coniguration (VPN etc.) does not functionate anymore. When given application in terminal I get the following message : nm-applet 2407 warning could not register with accessibility bus did not receive a reply Possible causes : the remote application did not send a reply ,the message bus security policy policy blocked the reply , time out , network connection broken . NM-applet 2407 warning failed to register as an agent (32), an agent with this ID already registered for this user. Is there a way to solve this problem ? Op Thu, 09 Jul 2015 16:53:18 +0200 schreef Martin Cigorraga martincigorr...@gmail.com: Hello Ger, Could you please elaborate a bit further? What kind of issues are you having? What did you do to try to solve them? -Martin On Thu, Jul 9, 2015, 11:49 Ger van Dijck ger.vandi...@dommel.be wrote: Hello , I have a question : My Network applet in the upper command bar does not fuctionate anymore. Is there a way to repair it ? Greetings , Ger van Dijck. -- Gemaakt met Opera's e-mailprogramma: http://www.opera.com/mail/ -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org -- Gemaakt met Opera's revolutionaire e-mailprogramma: http://www.opera.com/mail/ -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: aeskulap and dicom files
On Fri, 2015-07-10 at 10:16 +0800, Ed Greshko wrote: On 07/10/15 09:20, Gregory P. Ennis wrote: Looks like aeskulap was not included in F22. I had it on F21 and before. It was a very decent dicom viewer. Does anyone know why this was not included in F22. It was a good product. Looking at their website, http://aeskulap.nongnu.org/, it doesn't appear to be a very active or maintained application. The last release was in 2007. It is possible that with changes to system libraries other factors it became too hard to build and maintain? If you need it, why don't you try downloading the F21 rpm and installing it on your F22 system. -- Sorta what I want to say when folks habitually complain about Fedora - https://youtu.be/ZArl8fTfub4 Ed, Thanks for your response. That was a good idea, but I did not get very far : [root@HmGe f21]# rpm -Uhvf aeskulap-0.2.2-0.19beta1.fc21.x86_64.rpm error: Failed dependencies: libdcmdata.so.3.6()(64bit) is needed by aeskulap-0.2.2 -0.19beta1.fc21.x86_64 libdcmimage.so.3.6()(64bit) is needed by aeskulap-0.2.2 -0.19beta1.fc21.x86_64 libdcmimgle.so.3.6()(64bit) is needed by aeskulap-0.2.2 -0.19beta1.fc21.x86_64 libdcmjpeg.so.3.6()(64bit) is needed by aeskulap-0.2.2 -0.19beta1.fc21.x86_64 libdcmnet.so.3.6()(64bit) is needed by aeskulap-0.2.2 -0.19beta1.fc21.x86_64 libijg12.so.3.6()(64bit) is needed by aeskulap-0.2.2 -0.19beta1.fc21.x86_64 libijg16.so.3.6()(64bit) is needed by aeskulap-0.2.2 -0.19beta1.fc21.x86_64 libijg8.so.3.6()(64bit) is needed by aeskulap-0.2.2 -0.19beta1.fc21.x86_64 liboflog.so.3.6()(64bit) is needed by aeskulap-0.2.2 -0.19beta1.fc21.x86_64 libofstd.so.3.6()(64bit) is needed by aeskulap-0.2.2 -0.19beta1.fc21.x86_64 I have tried to contact the maintainer of f21 aeskulap, sanjay.an...@gmail.com, to see if I could persuade him to maintain the package for f22, but I he has not responded yet. This was really an excellent product even though the developer has not added to it since 2007. If anyone else has ideas I would appreciate suggestions. Greg -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: aeskulap and dicom files
On Sat, 2015-07-11 at 17:48 +0100, John Austin wrote: On Sat, 2015-07-11 at 11:00 -0500, Gregory P. Ennis wrote: On Fri, 2015-07-10 at 10:16 +0800, Ed Greshko wrote: On 07/10/15 09:20, Gregory P. Ennis wrote: Looks like aeskulap was not included in F22. I had it on F21 and before. It was a very decent dicom viewer. Does anyone know why this was not included in F22. It was a good product. Looking at their website, http://aeskulap.nongnu.org/, it doesn't appear to be a very active or maintained application. The last release was in 2007. It is possible that with changes to system libraries other factors it became too hard to build and maintain? If you need it, why don't you try downloading the F21 rpm and installing it on your F22 system. -- Sorta what I want to say when folks habitually complain about Fedora - https://youtu.be/ZArl8fTfub4 Ed, Thanks for your response. That was a good idea, but I did not get very far : [root@HmGe f21]# rpm -Uhvf aeskulap-0.2.2-0.19beta1.fc21.x86_64.rpm error: Failed dependencies: libdcmdata.so.3.6()(64bit) is needed by aeskulap-0.2.2 -0.19beta1.fc21.x86_64 libdcmimage.so.3.6()(64bit) is needed by aeskulap-0.2.2 -0.19beta1.fc21.x86_64 libdcmimgle.so.3.6()(64bit) is needed by aeskulap-0.2.2 -0.19beta1.fc21.x86_64 libdcmjpeg.so.3.6()(64bit) is needed by aeskulap-0.2.2 -0.19beta1.fc21.x86_64 libdcmnet.so.3.6()(64bit) is needed by aeskulap-0.2.2 -0.19beta1.fc21.x86_64 libijg12.so.3.6()(64bit) is needed by aeskulap-0.2.2 -0.19beta1.fc21.x86_64 libijg16.so.3.6()(64bit) is needed by aeskulap-0.2.2 -0.19beta1.fc21.x86_64 libijg8.so.3.6()(64bit) is needed by aeskulap-0.2.2 -0.19beta1.fc21.x86_64 liboflog.so.3.6()(64bit) is needed by aeskulap-0.2.2 -0.19beta1.fc21.x86_64 libofstd.so.3.6()(64bit) is needed by aeskulap-0.2.2 -0.19beta1.fc21.x86_64 I have tried to contact the maintainer of f21 aeskulap, sanjay.an...@gmail.com, to see if I could persuade him to maintain the package for f22, but I he has not responded yet. This was really an excellent product even though the developer has not added to it since 2007. If anyone else has ideas I would appreciate suggestions. Greg Hi This worked OK for me I don't even think I needed to download aeskulap separately 2015_07_10 Down loaded aeskulap-0.2.2-0.19beta1.fc21.x86_64.rpm from F21 mirror Installed on F22 as follows dnf --nogpgcheck --releasever=21 install aeskulap-0.2.2 -0.19beta1.fc21.x86_64.rpm Hope it helps John = === = === = Package Arch Version Repository Size = === = === = Installing: CharLS x86_64 1.0-8.fc21 fedora 66 k aeskulapx86_64 0.2.2-0.19beta1.fc21 @commandline 1.1 M dcmtk x86_64 3.6.0-18.fc21 fedora 3.9 M gconfmm26 x86_64 2.28.3-8.fc21 fedora 46 k libglademm24x86_64 2.6.7-11.fc21 fedora 42 k Transaction Summary = === = === = Install 5 Packages John, Can you give me a list of what repositories you are using. Here is what I got Greg [root@HmGe f21]#
Re: fedora 22: KDE Application Launcher treeview
On Sat, 11 Jul 2015 19:04:00 +0200 Maurizio Marini mau...@datalogica.com wrote: 2. changing from one window application to another cause a screen flickering It seems that flickering is fixed using system settings / hardware section / Display and Monitor / compositor: scale method - crisp My hw is an Asus Notebook X73B with Radeon HD 7074M smime.p7s Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: aeskulap and dicom files
On Sat, 2015-07-11 at 11:00 -0500, Gregory P. Ennis wrote: On Fri, 2015-07-10 at 10:16 +0800, Ed Greshko wrote: On 07/10/15 09:20, Gregory P. Ennis wrote: Looks like aeskulap was not included in F22. I had it on F21 and before. It was a very decent dicom viewer. Does anyone know why this was not included in F22. It was a good product. Looking at their website, http://aeskulap.nongnu.org/, it doesn't appear to be a very active or maintained application. The last release was in 2007. It is possible that with changes to system libraries other factors it became too hard to build and maintain? If you need it, why don't you try downloading the F21 rpm and installing it on your F22 system. -- Sorta what I want to say when folks habitually complain about Fedora - https://youtu.be/ZArl8fTfub4 Ed, Thanks for your response. That was a good idea, but I did not get very far : [root@HmGe f21]# rpm -Uhvf aeskulap-0.2.2-0.19beta1.fc21.x86_64.rpm error: Failed dependencies: libdcmdata.so.3.6()(64bit) is needed by aeskulap-0.2.2 -0.19beta1.fc21.x86_64 libdcmimage.so.3.6()(64bit) is needed by aeskulap-0.2.2 -0.19beta1.fc21.x86_64 libdcmimgle.so.3.6()(64bit) is needed by aeskulap-0.2.2 -0.19beta1.fc21.x86_64 libdcmjpeg.so.3.6()(64bit) is needed by aeskulap-0.2.2 -0.19beta1.fc21.x86_64 libdcmnet.so.3.6()(64bit) is needed by aeskulap-0.2.2 -0.19beta1.fc21.x86_64 libijg12.so.3.6()(64bit) is needed by aeskulap-0.2.2 -0.19beta1.fc21.x86_64 libijg16.so.3.6()(64bit) is needed by aeskulap-0.2.2 -0.19beta1.fc21.x86_64 libijg8.so.3.6()(64bit) is needed by aeskulap-0.2.2 -0.19beta1.fc21.x86_64 liboflog.so.3.6()(64bit) is needed by aeskulap-0.2.2 -0.19beta1.fc21.x86_64 libofstd.so.3.6()(64bit) is needed by aeskulap-0.2.2 -0.19beta1.fc21.x86_64 I have tried to contact the maintainer of f21 aeskulap, sanjay.an...@gmail.com, to see if I could persuade him to maintain the package for f22, but I he has not responded yet. This was really an excellent product even though the developer has not added to it since 2007. If anyone else has ideas I would appreciate suggestions. Greg Hi This worked OK for me I don't even think I needed to download aeskulap separately 2015_07_10 Down loaded aeskulap-0.2.2-0.19beta1.fc21.x86_64.rpm from F21 mirror Installed on F22 as follows dnf --nogpgcheck --releasever=21 install aeskulap-0.2.2-0.19beta1.fc21.x86_64.rpm Hope it helps John = Package Arch Version Repository Size = Installing: CharLS x86_64 1.0-8.fc21 fedora 66 k aeskulapx86_64 0.2.2-0.19beta1.fc21@commandline 1.1 M dcmtk x86_64 3.6.0-18.fc21 fedora 3.9 M gconfmm26 x86_64 2.28.3-8.fc21 fedora 46 k libglademm24x86_64 2.6.7-11.fc21 fedora 42 k Transaction Summary = Install 5 Packages -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away:
Re: A Fedora history question.
On 07/11/2015 11:00 AM, Kevin Fenzi wrote: On Fri, 10 Jul 2015 20:52:31 -0600 jd1008 jd1...@gmail.com wrote: Guys! No. I mean first release according a wicki, was dubbed by RH as 0.8 not 8.0 back in 1993??? Which wiki? I don't recall ever hearing about 0.8/0.9 versions... kevin https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/History_of_Red_Hat_Linux release labeled n/a is what I am referring to as 0.8 -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: GNOME applications do not respect the chosen XFCE style
On Fri, 10 Jul 2015 22:36:17 +0100 Paul Smith phh...@gmail.com wrote: Dear All, I am running XFCE on Fedora 22. And my problem is that the GNOME applications does not obey to the windows style I have chosen for XFCE applications. Any idea how to solve this problem? Thanks in advance, Xfce is gtk2 based, most gnome3 applications are gtk3 based. Setting a gtk2 theme won't change any gtk3 apps. So, make sure you have a gtk3 based them to set them to. xfce-theme-manager package might be of help (it lets you see all the themes you have installed/available and lets you tweak and set them). kevin pgpAPs4OEOA_F.pgp Description: OpenPGP digital signature -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: A Fedora history question.
On Fri, 10 Jul 2015 20:52:31 -0600 jd1008 jd1...@gmail.com wrote: Guys! No. I mean first release according a wicki, was dubbed by RH as 0.8 not 8.0 back in 1993??? Which wiki? I don't recall ever hearing about 0.8/0.9 versions... kevin pgp5IuK1l03hh.pgp Description: OpenPGP digital signature -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: fedora 22: KDE Application Launcher treeview
On Sat, 11 Jul 2015 19:04:00 +0200 Maurizio Marini mau...@datalogica.com wrote: I will ask on each mailing list, but in the meantime, please help me with KDE Apllication Launcher: I have ever used it in a tree-view manner, classic view now I am not able to find where reset it to this view Found! Right click on Panel Button, then Alternatives... Then you can select Application Launcher Application Menu -m smime.p7s Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
fedora 22: KDE Application Launcher treeview
I am very disappointed, after more than 15 upgrade of Fedora w/out reinstalling, 22 is a messy: 1. claws addressbook tab completion when selecting recipients does not work 2. changing from one window application to another cause a screen flickering 3. look and feel is very different by previous release I will ask on each mailing list, but in the meantime, please help me with KDE Apllication Launcher: I have ever used it in a tree-view manner, classic view now I am not able to find where reset it to this view -m smime.p7s Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: aeskulap and dicom files
On 11.07.2015, John Austin wrote: dnf --nogpgcheck --releasever=21 install aeskulap-0.2.2-0.19beta1.fc21.x86_64.rpm On my F22 machine, this ends up with: Error: package aeskulap-0.2.2-0.20beta1.fc21.x86_64 requires libdcmdata.so.3.6()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed Btw: there is also ginkgo-cadx. It's not as good as aeskulap, and doesn't compile on Fedora (but does on Arch). Here's the error: /usr/local/src/srcpkg/ginkgocadx-3.6.1.1367.34/src/cadxcore/api/initwx.cpp:67:42: fatal error: vtkThreadedStreamingPipeline.h: No such file or directory This is because vtkThreadedStreamingPipeline.h was removed from vtk. So if anybody wants to spend some time on it... (not me). -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: A Fedora history question.
On 07/10/2015 07:52 PM, jd1008 wrote: I mean first release according a wicki, was dubbed by RH as 0.8 not 8.0 back in 1993??? As far as I know, there's no remaining archive of the original beta releases of Red Hat Linux. -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: aeskulap and dicom files
On Sat, 11 Jul 2015 11:00:52 -0500 Gregory P. Ennis po...@pomec.net wrote: Looking at their website, http://aeskulap.nongnu.org/, it doesn't appear to be a very active or maintained application. The last release was in 2007. It is possible that with changes to system libraries other factors it became too hard to build and maintain? Just tried to rebuild aeskulap on F22. Too many errors. What about http://amide.sourceforge.net/ ? Rebuild was done without any problems. Dependencies are in Fedora repository. I can see demo images (error on the initial window). Unfortunately i can't find the CD with my own images to look at it. If you have problems to rebuild the package, i can send you .rpm and .srpm. BR, Bob -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: A Fedora history question.
On 07/11/2015 06:59 PM, Gordon Messmer wrote: On 07/10/2015 07:52 PM, jd1008 wrote: I mean first release according a wicki, was dubbed by RH as 0.8 not 8.0 back in 1993??? As far as I know, there's no remaining archive of the original beta releases of Red Hat Linux. Sigh!! :( I enjoy running and comparing those old first releases. Did you see the page at https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/History_of_Red_Hat_Linux ? -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: [389-users] 389-ds access.log parsing - turning LDAP request type into an audit event
On Mon, 2015-07-06 at 08:00 -0600, Rich Megginson wrote: On 07/03/2015 05:49 AM, Burn Alting wrote: Has anyone authored code to parse a 389 Directory Server's access.log file(s) with an aim of generating audit events based around the LDAP request type. Basically, take the log sequence [21/Apr/2007:11:39:51 -0700] conn=11 fd=608 slot=608 connection from 207.1.153.51 to 192.18.122.139 [21/Apr/2007:11:39:51 -0700] conn=11 op=0 BIND dn=cn=Directory Manager method=128 version=3 [21/Apr/2007:11:39:51 -0700] conn=11 op=0 RESULT err=0 tag=97 nentries=0 etime=0 [21/Apr/2007:11:39:51 -0700] conn=11 op=1 SRCH base=dc=example,dc=com scope=2 filter=(uid=bjensen) [21/Apr/2007:11:39:51 -0700] conn=11 op=1 RESULT err=0 tag=101 nentries=1 etime=1000 notes=U [21/Apr/2007:11:39:51 -0700] conn=11 op=2 UNBIND [21/Apr/2007:11:39:51 -0700] conn=11 op=2 fd=608 closed - U1 And turn this into an audit event with a date/time (21/Apr/2007:11:39:51 -0700), a client location (207.1.153.51), server location (192.18.122.139), a user (cn=Directory Manager), an event (SRCH) and event metadata of (query - base=dc=example,dc=com scope=2 filter=(uid=bjensen), result set size - 1, timetaken = 1000 sec, etc) The logconv.pl script seems to do all sorts of analysis, but no event representation. This sounds like a request for a new feature. Would you be able to write up a description of the new feature based on http://www.port389.org/docs/389ds/design/design-template.html? If so, I will post it to the 389 wiki and assign a ticket. Rich, Find the write up below. Regards Burn Alting Title - Parse audit-able events from 389/directory server access logs Overview A utility is required to parse 389/directory server access logs whose output is a well defined record (event) of the LDAP request and any resultant responses. Each event would contain the initiating host address and the current authenticated DN to make subsequent entity access analysis more efficient. In essence, generate a single event for every operation (common op=) performed for a unique connection. The events need to be well formed and consideration given to further downstream parsing. As the access log records are well documented, the output event should minimize changes to the content (if changed at all). The utility would need to support time based queries. That is, generate events between a given start and end time. Note that if the connection and authentication occurs BEFORE the given start time, this detail still needs to decorate the event output. The utility would need to indicate if the authenticated DN or initiating client could not be ascertained. That is, the information is NOT in the file(s) processed. Optionally can ignore internal operations. Use Cases - The following cases show a logfile extract and resultant parsed output. The output is in XML. Other well formed and parsable output could be chosen (eg json) - the intent is that downstream capability needs to parse the information. #1 Extract: [21/Apr/2009:11:39:51 -0700] conn=11 fd=608 slot=608 connection from 207.1.153.57 to 192.18.122.139 [21/Apr/2009:11:39:51 -0700] conn=11 op=0 BIND dn=cn=Directory Manager method=128 version=3 [21/Apr/2009:11:39:51 -0700] conn=11 op=0 RESULT err=0 tag=97 nentries=0 etime=0 [21/Apr/2009:11:39:51 -0700] conn=11 op=1 SRCH base=dc=example,dc=com scope=2 filter=(mobile=+1 123 456-7890) [21/Apr/2009:11:39:51 -0700] conn=11 op=1 RESULT err=0 tag=101 nentries=1 etime=3 notes=U [21/Apr/2009:11:39:51 -0700] conn=11 op=2 UNBIND [21/Apr/2009:11:39:51 -0700] conn=11 op=2 fd=608 closed - U1 Resultant sub-extract and Event output: [21/Apr/2009:11:39:51 -0700] conn=11 fd=608 slot=608 connection from 207.1.153.57 to 192.18.122.139 [21/Apr/2009:11:39:51 -0700] conn=11 op=0 BIND dn=cn=Directory Manager method=128 version=3 [21/Apr/2009:11:39:51 -0700] conn=11 op=0 RESULT err=0 tag=97 nentries=0 etime=0 Event DateTime21/Apr/2009:11:39:51 -0700/DateTime Client207.1.153.57/Client Server192.18.122.139/Server Connection11/Connection Operation0/Operation AuthenticatedDNcn=Directory Manager/AuthenticatedDN ActionBIND/Action Requests RequestBIND dn=quot;cn=Directory Managerquot; method=128 version=3/Request /Requests Responses ResponseRESULT err=0 tag=97 nentries=0 etime=0/Response /Responses /Event [21/Apr/2009:11:39:51 -0700] conn=11 op=1 SRCH base=dc=example,dc=com scope=2 filter=(mobile=+1 123 456-7890) [21/Apr/2009:11:39:51 -0700] conn=11 op=1 RESULT err=0 tag=101 nentries=1 etime=3 notes=U Event DateTime21/Apr/2009:11:39:51 -0700/DateTime Client207.1.153.57/Client Server192.18.122.139/Server Connection11/Connection Operation1/Operation AuthenticatedDNcn=Directory Manager/AuthenticatedDN ActionSRCH/Action Requests RequestSRCH base=quot;dc=example,dc=comquot; scope=2 filter=quot;(mobile=+1 123 456-7890)quot;/Request
Re: Fedora21/22 grub doesn't recognize my raid1/LVM partitions
On Sat, 11 Jul 2015, John Wright wrote: I have 2 500G hard drives partitioned with a few 'normal' partitions for /boot, swap, etc but mostly in a raid 1 array, which is divided into several LVM partitions. For many Fedora releases, I have done fresh installs, preserving the /home LVM partition, and rotating the root partition among several 30-40G LVM partitions for /. This has always worked splendidly until Fedora 21/22. Recently I decided that it was time to move up to Fedora 22, and with failing that, to Fedora 21. I have tried several Fedora 22 and Fedora 21. live install disks (desktop, server) and the server isos. With the live disks, the installer doesn't see my existing LVM partitions, so I can't try to install into them. With the 21 and 22 server isos, the installer sees the LVM partitions and appears to proceed normally, but the final reboot boots into a grub rescue shell, and the only partition visible to this shell is my /boot partition. I also tried the Fedora 22 netinstall iso, which also ultimately resulted in reboot into the grub rescue shell. I have googled several variations of 'grub doesn't recognize LVM partitions' without turning up anything helpful. Have there been changes to the LVM software that might result in an incompatibility between grub and older LVM versions? Best, -jmw- Bug report filed, bugzilla Bug 1242193 -jmw- -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: GNOME applications do not respect the chosen XFCE style
On 07/11/2015 07:02 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote: On Fri, 10 Jul 2015 22:36:17 +0100 Paul Smith phh...@gmail.com wrote: Dear All, I am running XFCE on Fedora 22. And my problem is that the GNOME applications does not obey to the windows style I have chosen for XFCE applications. Any idea how to solve this problem? Thanks in advance, Xfce is gtk2 based, most gnome3 applications are gtk3 based. Setting a gtk2 theme won't change any gtk3 apps. So, make sure you have a gtk3 based them to set them to. Could you be more verbose. What exactly are people supposed to install and which themes/settinga are known to work? At least I have not been able to find any xfce/gtk2/gtk3 theme combo which harmonizes well with gnome3-apps under xfce on fc22 and deserves to be named functional. IMO, it's all an annoying and dysfunctional mess. Ralf -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: fedora 22: KDE Application Launcher treeview
On Sat, 2015-07-11 at 19:42 +0200, Maurizio Marini wrote: On Sat, 11 Jul 2015 19:04:00 +0200 Maurizio Marini mau...@datalogica.com wrote: 2. changing from one window application to another cause a screen flickering It seems that flickering is fixed using system settings / hardware section / Display and Monitor / compositor: scale method - crisp My hw is an Asus Notebook X73B with Radeon HD 7074M Glad you managed to fix your problems. For future reference, you can as k KDE questions on the Fedora KDE list. See https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/kde poc -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Fedora21/22 grub doesn't recognize my raid1/LVM partitions
I have 2 500G hard drives partitioned with a few 'normal' partitions for /boot, swap, etc but mostly in a raid 1 array, which is divided into several LVM partitions. For many Fedora releases, I have done fresh installs, preserving the /home LVM partition, and rotating the root partition among several 30-40G LVM partitions for /. This has always worked splendidly until Fedora 21/22. Recently I decided that it was time to move up to Fedora 22, and with failing that, to Fedora 21. I have tried several Fedora 22 and Fedora 21. live install disks (desktop, server) and the server isos. With the live disks, the installer doesn't see my existing LVM partitions, so I can't try to install into them. With the 21 and 22 server isos, the installer sees the LVM partitions and appears to proceed normally, but the final reboot boots into a grub rescue shell, and the only partition visible to this shell is my /boot partition. I also tried the Fedora 22 netinstall iso, which also ultimately resulted in reboot into the grub rescue shell. I have googled several variations of 'grub doesn't recognize LVM partitions' without turning up anything helpful. Have there been changes to the LVM software that might result in an incompatibility between grub and older LVM versions? Best, -jmw- -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: fedora 22: KDE Application Launcher treeview
On 07/11/2015 10:20 AM, Maurizio Marini wrote: On Sat, 11 Jul 2015 19:04:00 +0200 Maurizio Marini mau...@datalogica.com wrote: I will ask on each mailing list, but in the meantime, please help me with KDE Apllication Launcher: I have ever used it in a tree-view manner, classic view now I am not able to find where reset it to this view Found! Right click on Panel Button, then Alternatives... Then you can select Application Launcher Application Menu Unfortunately there is still no way to get rid of the Search field, which steals focus, and removes the ability to access application launcher entries via the keyboard. Jon -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: Fedora21/22 grub doesn't recognize my raid1/LVM partitions
On Sat, Jul 11, 2015 at 4:25 PM, John Wright jwrig...@san.rr.com wrote: I have 2 500G hard drives partitioned with a few 'normal' partitions for /boot, swap, etc but mostly in a raid 1 array, which is divided into several LVM partitions. For many Fedora releases, I have done fresh installs, preserving the /home LVM partition, and rotating the root partition among several 30-40G LVM partitions for /. This has always worked splendidly until Fedora 21/22. Recently I decided that it was time to move up to Fedora 22, and with failing that, to Fedora 21. I have tried several Fedora 22 and Fedora 21. live install disks (desktop, server) and the server isos. With the live disks, the installer doesn't see my existing LVM partitions, so I can't try to install into them. With the 21 and 22 server isos, the installer sees the LVM partitions and appears to proceed normally, but the final reboot boots into a grub rescue shell, and the only partition visible to this shell is my /boot partition. I also tried the Fedora 22 netinstall iso, which also ultimately resulted in reboot into the grub rescue shell. I have googled several variations of 'grub doesn't recognize LVM partitions' without turning up anything helpful. Have there been changes to the LVM software that might result in an incompatibility between grub and older LVM versions? I'm pretty sure GRUB doesn't understand LVM thin volumes, and maybe not LVM RAID. But otherwise there are no changes I'm aware of that would prevent this from working. It sounds more likely there's some sort of udev or multipath confusion at boot time from lives that's helping to cause misidentification. All I can suggest is to file a bug report against anaconda. Boot the live media, launch the installer, go to custom partitioning, and then before changing anything, drop to tty2, go into /tmp and collect the logs. What I usually do is: tar -acf f22analogs.tar.gz *log scp f22analogs.tar.gz chris@blah.local:~/Desktop/ And there untar it, and file a bug, attaching each log file as a separate attachment. Then post the bug URL here. If I get a moment to reproduce it in Rawhide, then I'll update the bug and hopefully it gets fixed for Fedora 23. Assuming it's a bug. It's also possible I'll find a work around, in which case I'll put that in the bug report also. -- Chris Murphy -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
