f21 :: dnf-yum conflicts with yum

[Adrian Sevcenco]

Hi! I am trying that, before f23 is out, to get used with dnf.
As such i am trying to install dnf but also to install the dnf-yum layer
(just in case my reflexes will kick in :) ) but i have an conflict with
yum .. and if i try to remove yum is bad :)

Is there something to be done or just a fresh install of f23?
Thank you!
Adrian



smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org

[389-users] 389DS userPassword and Freeradius

[ozikat]

Hi All,

Recently we would like to extend 389DS user into Radius for account 
authorization and authentication (WiFi with WPA-Enterprise, Portal and etc)


It seems like Freeradius only work with ClearText Password, i.e it 
cannot read password attribute userPassword with SHA-HASHed.


Anyone has workaround and idea on this?

We have freeradius setup, and it seems it doesnt work with MSCHAPv2 ;(

--
Ozikat.
--
389 users mailing list
389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-users

Re: updated f22->f23 using dnf system-upgrade, no significant issues

[Terry Polzin]

Isn't that what you would want?  A non-event?

On Tue, Nov 3, 2015 at 9:42 AM, Neal Becker  wrote:

> A boring update
>
> --
> users mailing list
> users@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
> Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
> Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
>
-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org

F23: ssh keys not recognized after upgrade

[Ranjan Maitra]

Hi,

I upgraded to F23 and things went smoothly. Or so it seemed.

Then I rebooted and tried to get password-less ssh going with the following 
consequences. (Note: some stuff, eg hostname, IP address, etc has been 
blinded.) Did anything change with F23 or something break or am I missing some 
package now? 

Note that password-less ssh worked even a few minutes before the upgrade. Also, 
I am logging into a F22 machine. The machine I am ssh-ing from is an upgraded 
F23.

Many thanks and best wishes,
Ranjan

$ ssh-add
Enter passphrase for /home/user/.ssh/id_rsa: 
Identity added: /home/user/.ssh/id_rsa (/home/user/.ssh/id_rsa)
Identity added: /home/user/.ssh/id_dsa (/home/user/.ssh/id_dsa)
Identity added: /home/user/.ssh/id_ecdsa (/home/user/.ssh/id_ecdsa)

Fine, nothing untoward yet. But then:

$ ssh -vvv remote.machine

OpenSSH_7.1p1, OpenSSL 1.0.2d-fips 9 Jul 2015
debug1: Reading configuration data /home/user/.ssh/config
debug1: /home/user/.ssh/config line 1: Applying options for *
debug1: /home/user/.ssh/config line 3: Applying options for remote.hostname
debug1: Reading configuration data /etc/ssh/ssh_config
debug1: /etc/ssh/ssh_config line 56: Applying options for *
debug2: ssh_connect: needpriv 0
debug1: Connecting to remote.hostname.com.ig [xx.xx.xxx.xxx] port XX.
debug2: fd 3 setting O_NONBLOCK
debug1: fd 3 clearing O_NONBLOCK
debug1: Connection established.
debug3: timeout: 599983 ms remain after connect
debug1: identity file /home/user/.ssh/id_rsa type 1
debug1: key_load_public: No such file or directory
debug1: identity file /home/user/.ssh/id_rsa-cert type -1
debug1: identity file /home/user/.ssh/id_dsa type 2
debug1: key_load_public: No such file or directory
debug1: identity file /home/user/.ssh/id_dsa-cert type -1
debug1: identity file /home/user/.ssh/id_ecdsa type 3
debug1: key_load_public: No such file or directory
debug1: identity file /home/user/.ssh/id_ecdsa-cert type -1
debug1: key_load_public: No such file or directory
debug1: identity file /home/user/.ssh/id_ed25519 type -1
debug1: key_load_public: No such file or directory
debug1: identity file /home/user/.ssh/id_ed25519-cert type -1
debug1: Enabling compatibility mode for protocol 2.0
debug1: Local version string SSH-2.0-OpenSSH_7.1
debug1: Remote protocol version 2.0, remote software version OpenSSH_6.9
debug1: match: OpenSSH_6.9 pat OpenSSH* compat 0x0400
debug2: fd 3 setting O_NONBLOCK
debug1: Authenticating to remote.hostname.com.ig:XX as 'user'
debug3: put_host_port: [remote.hostname.com.ig]:XX
debug3: hostkeys_foreach: reading file "/home/user/.ssh/known_hosts"
debug3: record_hostkey: found key type ECDSA in file 
/home/user/.ssh/known_hosts:8
debug3: load_hostkeys: loaded 1 keys from [remote.hostname.com.ig]:XX
debug3: order_hostkeyalgs: prefer hostkeyalgs: 
ecdsa-sha2-nistp256-cert-...@openssh.com,ecdsa-sha2-nistp384-cert-...@openssh.com,ecdsa-sha2-nistp521-cert-...@openssh.com,ecdsa-sha2-nistp256,ecdsa-sha2-nistp384,ecdsa-sha2-nistp521
debug1: SSH2_MSG_KEXINIT sent
debug1: SSH2_MSG_KEXINIT received
debug2: kex_parse_kexinit: 
curve25519-sha...@libssh.org,ecdh-sha2-nistp256,ecdh-sha2-nistp384,ecdh-sha2-nistp521,diffie-hellman-group-exchange-sha256,diffie-hellman-group-exchange-sha1,diffie-hellman-group14-sha1
debug2: kex_parse_kexinit: 
ecdsa-sha2-nistp256-cert-...@openssh.com,ecdsa-sha2-nistp384-cert-...@openssh.com,ecdsa-sha2-nistp521-cert-...@openssh.com,ecdsa-sha2-nistp256,ecdsa-sha2-nistp384,ecdsa-sha2-nistp521,ssh-ed25519-cert-...@openssh.com,ssh-rsa-cert-...@openssh.com,ssh-ed25519,ssh-rsa
debug2: kex_parse_kexinit: 
chacha20-poly1...@openssh.com,aes128-ctr,aes192-ctr,aes256-ctr,aes128-...@openssh.com,aes256-...@openssh.com,arcfour256,arcfour128,aes128-cbc,3des-cbc,blowfish-cbc,cast128-cbc,aes192-cbc,aes256-cbc,arcfour,rijndael-...@lysator.liu.se
debug2: kex_parse_kexinit: 
chacha20-poly1...@openssh.com,aes128-ctr,aes192-ctr,aes256-ctr,aes128-...@openssh.com,aes256-...@openssh.com,arcfour256,arcfour128,aes128-cbc,3des-cbc,blowfish-cbc,cast128-cbc,aes192-cbc,aes256-cbc,arcfour,rijndael-...@lysator.liu.se
debug2: kex_parse_kexinit: 
umac-64-...@openssh.com,umac-128-...@openssh.com,hmac-sha2-256-...@openssh.com,hmac-sha2-512-...@openssh.com,hmac-sha1-...@openssh.com,umac...@openssh.com,umac-...@openssh.com,hmac-sha2-256,hmac-sha2-512,hmac-sha1,hmac-md5-...@openssh.com,hmac-ripemd160-...@openssh.com,hmac-sha1-96-...@openssh.com,hmac-md5-96-...@openssh.com,hmac-md5,hmac-ripemd160,hmac-ripemd...@openssh.com,hmac-sha1-96,hmac-md5-96
debug2: kex_parse_kexinit: 
umac-64-...@openssh.com,umac-128-...@openssh.com,hmac-sha2-256-...@openssh.com,hmac-sha2-512-...@openssh.com,hmac-sha1-...@openssh.com,umac...@openssh.com,umac-...@openssh.com,hmac-sha2-256,hmac-sha2-512,hmac-sha1,hmac-md5-...@openssh.com,hmac-ripemd160-...@openssh.com,hmac-sha1-96-...@openssh.com,hmac-md5-96-...@openssh.com,hmac-md5,hmac-ripemd160,hmac-ripemd...@openssh.com,hmac-sha1-96,hmac-md5-96
debug2: kex_parse_kexinit: none,z...@openssh.com,zlib
debug2: 

rpm transaction lock error?

[Neal Becker]

I tried installing vivaldi-beta on f23, and got:

 sudo rpm -i ~/Downloads/vivaldi-beta-1.0.303.52-2.x86_64.rpm 
[sudo] password for nbecker: 
warning: /home/nbecker/Downloads/vivaldi-beta-1.0.303.52-2.x86_64.rpm: 
Header V4 RSA/SHA1 Signature, key ID bf1700f8: NOKEY
warning: Generating 2 missing index(es), please wait...
error: can't create transaction lock on /var/lib/rpm/.rpm.lock (Resource 
temporarily unavailable)
error: /tmp/google.sig.gc6XhF: key 1 import failed.
Redirecting to /bin/systemctl start  atd.service

Any ideas on these errors?

-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org

[Fwd: Fedora 23 is here!]

[Mike Chambers]

In case anyone was hiding under a rock, or just happened to miss the
announcement.

Mike

 Forwarded Message 
From: Matthew Miller 
To: annou...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Subject: Fedora 23 is here!
Date: Tue, 3 Nov 2015 09:56:23 -0500

Fedora 23 released
==

It's (approximately) Halloween, so you know what that means — new
Fedora! The Fedora 23 release is here, and it's better than ever
before. We're pleased to bring you the latest incarnations of the three
main Fedora editions — Fedora Workstation, Fedora Cloud, and Fedora
Server, each built with love by the Fedora community to custom-fit your
needs in different areas. Fedora 23 is also available in alternate
desktop Spins, curated software Labs, and special images for the ARM
processor architecture.

If that's all you need to hear, download from https://getfedora.org/,
or if you already use Fedora, follow the simple upgrade steps at
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upgrading.

Otherwise, read on for details.


Fedora Workstation
--

If you're a software developer, laptop or home user, hobbyist,
enthusiast, or student, Fedora Workstation is perfect for you. Fedora
Workstation includes the newest release of the GNOME desktop, which
makes your everyday computing simple, polished, and pleasant.
Experience the sleek interface and powerful tools for yourself —
download Fedora Workstation now.

* https://getfedora.org/workstation

Fedora Server


Fedora Server makes service management simple with RoleKit, a
programmatic interface for quick deployment, and Cockpit, a remote web
GUI. Now in Fedora Server 23, you can manage Kubernetes clusters from
the Cockpit Admin Console, or launch a FreeIPA domain controller from a
kickstart file. Get Fedora Server this morning and have an identity
management solution in place by lunchtime.

* https://getfedora.org/server

Fedora Cloud


Build scale-out computing with Fedora Cloud. The Fedora Cloud Base
image provides a minimal OS platform which can be downloaded for use in
OpenStack, or launched directly into EC2. Fedora Atomic Host takes
things in a more radical direction, providing a specialized system for
running Docker containers and Atomic Apps. Now with Fedora 23, Fedora
Atomic Host will be updated on a two-week cycle to keep at the edge of
emerging technology. Download or launch a Fedora Cloud image for your
chosen cloud provider, or as a Vagrant box for local development.

* https://getfedora.org/cloud/


Spins, Labs, and ARM


Fedora Spins are alternative desktops for Fedora that provide a
different experience than the standard Fedora Workstation edition. For
instance, the Fedora KDE and Fedora Xfce spins provide popular
alternatives to GNOME for Fedora users who enjoy the KDE or Xfce
experience. Fedora 23 also introduces a Cinnamon spin, which provides a
"traditional" desktop layout with the modern GNOME 3 shell.

* https://spins.fedoraproject.org

Fedora Labs are curated collections of software maintained by members
of the Fedora Community where you can find updated live media focused
on Games, Design, Robotics, and more. These may be installed on their
own or as add-ons to existing Fedora installations.

* https://labs.fedoraproject.org

We also provide a version of the Fedora operating system tailored for
running in on ARM-based systems, previously mixed into the Spins page
but now with a dedicated download page.

* https://arm.fedoraproject.org


Updated Components
--

As with every Fedora release, almost every component has a new version,
with improvements across the board. Of particular note, Fedora
Workstation includes the GNOME 3.18 desktop environment and the Libre
Office 5.0 office suite.

Fedora 23 also has important under-the-hood security improvements, with
increased hardening for all compiled software and with insecure SSL3
and RC4 protocols disabled. We've also updated all of the software
installed by default in Fedora Cloud Base Image and Fedora Workstation
to use Python version 3, and the Mono .NET compatible framework is now
at version 4.

Perhaps most importantly, Unicode 8.0 support now enables the crucial
U1F32D character.


Downloads, upgrades, documentation, and common bugs
---

You can start by downloading Fedora 23:

* https://getfedora.org/

If you are upgrading from a previous release of Fedora, refer to:

* http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upgrading

Read the full release notes for Fedora 23:

* https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/Fedora/23/html/Release_Notes/

Fedora 23 common bugs are documented at:

* http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Common_F23_bugs

This page includes information on several known bugs in Fedora 23.
Please be sure to read it before installing!

Contributing


We hope you're as excited as we are about Fedora 23 and look forward to
exploring it yourself. Don't forget — Fedora never stands 

Firefox suddenly defaults to flash again on youtube

[Heinz Diehl]

Hi,

the subject says it all. It came out of nowhere, the only thing I
remember is having used youtube-dl on this machine a singe time
today. Firefox used the HTML5 player on youtube, now flash is back as
the default player, and nothing helps to get rid of it. No downgrade,
no upgrade, only the manual switch to HTML5 on the youtube config
page. Next time, flash is back as the default player.

However, after creating a new user, the default player is html5 for
this one.

Where is the config option, switch or whatever changes the default
player in firefox back to html5 again?

Thanks,
 Heinz
 


-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org

Re: F23beta ----> F23

[Paul Cartwright]

On 11/03/2015 11:08 AM, Terry Polzin wrote:

Seems like a non event, dnf -y update did a few packages this AM.

rpm -q fedora-release returns fedora-release-23-1.noarch,  anyone know 
if this is correct?

dnf -y update
Last metadata expiration check performed 2:47:34 ago on Tue Nov  3 
09:11:56 2015.

Dependencies resolved.
Nothing to do.
Complete!

 rpm -q fedora-release
fedora-release-22-1.noarch

still F22 here.
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org

Re: Problems to boot

[Frank White]

2015-11-03 17:06 GMT+00:00 Erick Ocrospoma :
> Hi,
>
> On 3 November 2015 at 11:46, Frank White  wrote:
>>

>
> Which version of Fedora are you using ?
>

Oh I am sorry I have forgot to say it. It's fedora 21

> I suppose single command is not working because Fedora is using systemd. Try
> to set 'rd.break' instead of single.
>
> Follow this:
> http://linoxide.com/linux-how-to/reset-forgotten-root-password-rhel-centos-7/
>
> Follow the steps, specially autorelabel part, if your Fedora box has SElinux
> enabled this step is necessary.
>

ok, thank you

>> Anyone know how to fix it ?
>> Oh the last thing, my bot does not boot property, I mean it stop at
>> Network manager startup and it does not give me the login prompt on
>> gdm or console.
>>
>> Thank you.
>> --
>> users mailing list
>> users@lists.fedoraproject.org
>> To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
>> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
>> Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
>> Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
>> Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
>
>
>
>
> --
>
>
>
> ~ Happy install !
>
>
>
>
>
> Erick.
>
> ---
>
> IRC :   zerick
> Blog: http://zerick.me
> About :  http://about.me/zerick
> Linux User ID :  549567
>
> --
> users mailing list
> users@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
> Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
> Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
>
-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org

Re: F22 : No sound from firefox or chrome

[sean darcy]

On 10/30/2015 10:11 PM, Ed Greshko wrote:



On 10/31/15 09:44, sean darcy wrote:

On 10/16/2015 07:51 PM, sean darcy wrote:

On F22 XFCE. Sound works with the XFCE media player Parole. But I get no
sound from firefox, chrome or midori (the XFCE browser).

But - I do get sound from the TOR browser. ???

PulseAudio Manager shows as clients:

Chrome input
CubebUtils  - which has a firefox icon next to it

Any help appreciated.

sean


Went to :

http://camendesign.com/code/video_for_everybody/test.html

Chrome audio tested on html5, mp4, ogg and WebM. Video all works, no
audio on any.

firefox audio works for ogg and WebM, but not for html5 or mp4.

midori audio works for WebM, but not html5 or mp4. midori crashes on ogg.

Also tried
http://techslides.com/sample-webm-ogg-and-mp4-video-files-for-html5
Same results.

Is there someplace where audio is muted for specific clients ?


Yes.  If you bring up pavucontrol and go to the "Playback" tab and
Select "Show: Applications" when a application such as chrome is
attempting playback you'll see a section for it where you can mute
and/or set the volume for that application.



paplay Front_Left.wav works. So pulseaudio is not the problem, correct ?

Appreciate some help.

sean



That was it !

Thanks. I owe you a beer.

sean


--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org

Re: Problems to boot

[Erick Ocrospoma]

Hi,

On 3 November 2015 at 11:46, Frank White  wrote:

> Hi,
> I am a new subscriber but an old user, especially on linux.
> I have some problem to boot my box because I changed some files by a live
> cd.
> I lost my root password so tried some old method to change it. I tried
> to boot in single mode but it doesn't worked. After that I change the
> passwd file removing the x character ... but this has broken my box.
>
>
Which version of Fedora are you using ?

I suppose single command is not working because Fedora is using systemd.
Try to set 'rd.break' instead of single.

Follow this:
http://linoxide.com/linux-how-to/reset-forgotten-root-password-rhel-centos-7/

Follow the steps, specially autorelabel part, if your Fedora box has
SElinux enabled this step is necessary.


> I have rid of the following errors on the log:
> Nov  3 17:40:06 localhost dbus-daemon: Could not get password database
> information for UID of current process: User "???" unknown or no
> memory to allocate password entry
> Nov  3 17:40:06 localhost dbus-daemon: Unknown username "root" in
> message bus configuration file
>
> Anyone know how to fix it ?
> Oh the last thing, my bot does not boot property, I mean it stop at
> Network manager startup and it does not give me the login prompt on
> gdm or console.
>
> Thank you.
> --
> users mailing list
> users@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
> Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
> Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
>



-- 



~ Happy install !





Erick.

---

IRC :   zerick
Blog: http://zerick.me
About :  http://about.me/zerick
Linux User ID :  549567
-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org

Re: [Fwd: Fedora 23 is here!]

[Sudhir Khanger]

On Tuesday 03 Nov 2015 11:32:45 AM Mike Chambers wrote:
> In case anyone was hiding under a rock, or just happened to miss the
> announcement.

Are the common bugs resolved via updates after a release has been out for a 
few days? Is the common bugs wiki updated then?

https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Common_F23_bugs

-- 
Regards,
Sudhir Khanger,
sudhirkhanger.com.

-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org

Re: updated f22->f23 using dnf system-upgrade, no significant issues

[Dave Cross]

On 3 November 2015 at 14:42, Neal Becker  wrote:
> A boring update

Yep. Completely uneventful here too. Which is good :-)

-- 
Dave Cross :: d...@dave.org.uk
http://dave.org.uk/
@davorg
-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org

Re: [Fwd: Fedora 23 is here!]

[Paul Cartwright]

I was looking all morning, always showed F22, F23 beta downloads..
now I need to download F23 so I have the CD.. in case :)

On 11/03/2015 12:32 PM, Mike Chambers wrote:

In case anyone was hiding under a rock, or just happened to miss the
announcement.

Mike

 Forwarded Message 
From: Matthew Miller 
To: annou...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Subject: Fedora 23 is here!
Date: Tue, 3 Nov 2015 09:56:23 -0500

Fedora 23 released
==

It's (approximately) Halloween, so you know what that means — new
Fedora! The Fedora 23 release is here, and it's better than ever
before. We're pleased to bring you the latest incarnations of the three
main Fedora editions — Fedora Workstation, Fedora Cloud, and Fedora
Server, each built with love by the Fedora community to custom-fit your
needs in different areas. Fedora 23 is also available in alternate
desktop Spins, curated software Labs, and special images for the ARM
processor architecture.

If that's all you need to hear, download from https://getfedora.org/,
or if you already use Fedora, follow the simple upgrade steps at
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upgrading.

Otherwise, read on for details.


Fedora Workstation
--

If you're a software developer, laptop or home user, hobbyist,
enthusiast, or student, Fedora Workstation is perfect for you. Fedora
Workstation includes the newest release of the GNOME desktop, which
makes your everyday computing simple, polished, and pleasant.
Experience the sleek interface and powerful tools for yourself —
download Fedora Workstation now.

* https://getfedora.org/workstation

Fedora Server


Fedora Server makes service management simple with RoleKit, a
programmatic interface for quick deployment, and Cockpit, a remote web
GUI. Now in Fedora Server 23, you can manage Kubernetes clusters from
the Cockpit Admin Console, or launch a FreeIPA domain controller from a
kickstart file. Get Fedora Server this morning and have an identity
management solution in place by lunchtime.

* https://getfedora.org/server

Fedora Cloud


Build scale-out computing with Fedora Cloud. The Fedora Cloud Base
image provides a minimal OS platform which can be downloaded for use in
OpenStack, or launched directly into EC2. Fedora Atomic Host takes
things in a more radical direction, providing a specialized system for
running Docker containers and Atomic Apps. Now with Fedora 23, Fedora
Atomic Host will be updated on a two-week cycle to keep at the edge of
emerging technology. Download or launch a Fedora Cloud image for your
chosen cloud provider, or as a Vagrant box for local development.

* https://getfedora.org/cloud/


Spins, Labs, and ARM


Fedora Spins are alternative desktops for Fedora that provide a
different experience than the standard Fedora Workstation edition. For
instance, the Fedora KDE and Fedora Xfce spins provide popular
alternatives to GNOME for Fedora users who enjoy the KDE or Xfce
experience. Fedora 23 also introduces a Cinnamon spin, which provides a
"traditional" desktop layout with the modern GNOME 3 shell.

* https://spins.fedoraproject.org

Fedora Labs are curated collections of software maintained by members
of the Fedora Community where you can find updated live media focused
on Games, Design, Robotics, and more. These may be installed on their
own or as add-ons to existing Fedora installations.

* https://labs.fedoraproject.org

We also provide a version of the Fedora operating system tailored for
running in on ARM-based systems, previously mixed into the Spins page
but now with a dedicated download page.

* https://arm.fedoraproject.org


Updated Components
--

As with every Fedora release, almost every component has a new version,
with improvements across the board. Of particular note, Fedora
Workstation includes the GNOME 3.18 desktop environment and the Libre
Office 5.0 office suite.

Fedora 23 also has important under-the-hood security improvements, with
increased hardening for all compiled software and with insecure SSL3
and RC4 protocols disabled. We've also updated all of the software
installed by default in Fedora Cloud Base Image and Fedora Workstation
to use Python version 3, and the Mono .NET compatible framework is now
at version 4.

Perhaps most importantly, Unicode 8.0 support now enables the crucial
U1F32D character.


Downloads, upgrades, documentation, and common bugs
---

You can start by downloading Fedora 23:

* https://getfedora.org/

If you are upgrading from a previous release of Fedora, refer to:

* http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upgrading

Read the full release notes for Fedora 23:

* https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/Fedora/23/html/Release_Notes/

Fedora 23 common bugs are documented at:

* http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Common_F23_bugs

This page includes information on several known bugs in Fedora 23.
Please be sure to read it 

Re: [389-users] DB account master integrated with LDAP

[Mayberry, Alexander]

LDAP is a protocol.
Your directory is a database.

In your scenario, if "application 1" is used in this manner, it would become an 
identity management platform.  As long as this application has the ability to 
update your directory, you can do what you are suggesting.  I would caution 
you, though, with so many accounts, and no idea what your security 
considerations are, you may wish to take a long think on this one.  That's a 
lot of potentially sensitive information.  Combining an application with your 
identity management platform on the same system will increase your risks.  From 
a complexity standpoint, if your application has the ability to act as an 
identity management platform, it may also have the ability to update your 
"application 2" system directly, and eliminate the middle-man.  Or possibly 
"application 2" could be configured to auth directly to "application 1".  
Depending on what type of user management features are available in 
"application 1".

Alexander Mayberry
Enterprise Systems Engineer
SD Group: EIT Infrastructure - OMA
Enterprise.Systems Engineering.Infrastructure

From: 389-users-boun...@lists.fedoraproject.org 
[mailto:389-users-boun...@lists.fedoraproject.org] On Behalf Of Andy Spooner
Sent: Tuesday, November 03, 2015 12:33 PM
To: 389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Subject: [389-users] DB account master integrated with LDAP

I am using ldap to share user account information across two applications. Is 
it possible to using 'Application 1' as the central reference instead of the 
LDAP server? E.g.  Application 1' holds and maintains account information, 
which updates ldap periodically. 'Application 2' will look up LDAP for account 
informations. 'Application 1' is the main system and will hold millions of 
accounts which would operate quicker from the DB without having to refer to 
LDAP for usernames, passwords, etc. 'Application2' will require a small subset 
of users to logon using credentials of users in the master database - which can 
be done via LDAP.
--
389 users mailing list
389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-users

dnf has -y as default now in f32?

[Tom Horsley]

I just installed a virtual machine from the 64 bit f23 workstation
iso file. I'm running the first "dnf update" after the install,
and it just went ahead and started doing the updates.

Didn't it used to only do that if I said -y on the command line?
(I was planning on answering yes anyway, but this seemed
kind of surprising to me).
-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org

Re: [Fwd: Fedora 23 is here!]

[Matthew Miller]

On Wed, Nov 04, 2015 at 12:42:57AM +0530, Sudhir Khanger wrote:
> Are the common bugs resolved via updates after a release has been out for a 
> few days? 

Hopefully. :) It's really on a case-by-case basis some things take
longer than others to fix.


> Is the common bugs wiki updated then?

Usually, yes, when there's an update, the wiki should be edited to
indicate that a fix is available. This doesn't always happen, though.
If you know that there is an update for a particular common bug you're
tracking, feel free to make the edit.

-- 
Matthew Miller

Fedora Project Leader
-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org

Re: akmod-nvidia for f23 when?

[SternData]

On 11/03/2015 02:36 PM, Tom Horsley wrote:

Anyone know when an akmod-nvidia for f23 will show up on
rpmfusion? With a maxwell card, I can't get anything
but a blank screen without the binary nvidia driver
(I keep hoping nvidia and nouveau will work something
out with the firmware downloads, but nouveau still
doesn't work).



rpmfusion isn't there yet.  No 23 under
http://download1.rpmfusion.org/free/fedora/releases/

give it a day or so.

--
-- Steve
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org

Re: password-less ssh in F23

[Alchemist]

2015-11-04 0:06 GMT+02:00 Ranjan Maitra :

> A second machine is now failing to ssh in without a password only after a
> dnf system-upgrade --releasever=23. The machines being ssh-ed into are both
> on Fedora 22 (fully updated). But the machines that are ssh-ing in are on
> Fedora 23 (updated via dnf).
>
> Is anyone else having this issue?
>
> I posted the output of ssh -vvv earlier this morning but please let me
> know if additional information is needed to help me troubleshoot the
> problem.
>
> Many thanks again!
> Ranjan
>
>
Which type of key do you use for auth on that host? DSA keys (not host yet)
is deprecated now (PubkeyAcceptedKeyTypes). Check and confirm that correct
keys are loaded ssh-add -K, or try to restart ssh agent using different
auth socket, f.e in /var/tmp, also check each keyfile by logging in
manually.


>
>
> --
> users mailing list
> users@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
> Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
> Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
>
-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org

password-less ssh in F23

[Ranjan Maitra]

A second machine is now failing to ssh in without a password only after a dnf 
system-upgrade --releasever=23. The machines being ssh-ed into are both on 
Fedora 22 (fully updated). But the machines that are ssh-ing in are on Fedora 
23 (updated via dnf). 

Is anyone else having this issue?

I posted the output of ssh -vvv earlier this morning but please let me know if 
additional information is needed to help me troubleshoot the problem.

Many thanks again!
Ranjan


FREE 3D EARTH SCREENSAVER - Watch the Earth right on your desktop!
Check it out at http://www.inbox.com/earth


-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org

Re: updated f22->f23 using dnf system-upgrade, no significant issues

[Patrick O'Callaghan]

On 3 November 2015 at 21:25, Patrick O'Callaghan 
wrote:

> mount: unknown filesystem type 'btrfs'
>
> I have btrfs-progs. This worked correctly on F22. A dnf search shows a
> storaged-btrfs package which seems to be new (or at least not required in
> F22) but installing it and rebooting makes no difference.
>

Just confirmed that /home does still mount correctly under F22.

poc
-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org

Re: updated f22->f23 using dnf system-upgrade, no significant issues

[Erik P. Olsen]

On 2015-11-03 at 09:42:59 Neal Becker wrote:

> A boring update
> 

Just did F21->F22, equally boring.

-- 
Erik
-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org

Re: updated f22->f23 using dnf system-upgrade, no significant issues

[Paul Cartwright]

On 11/03/2015 03:19 PM, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:


1) Did the dnf update of 3055 packages
2) Rebooted and installed F23 with no errors
3) On booting the new system, got a low-res login (for KDE). 
Investigation showed that the akmod-nvidia race condition bug is still 
there, so installed kmod-nvidia by hand and rebooted.

4) Now I get a text-mode log of update progress, ending with:

[ OK] Reached target Switch Root.
 Starting Switch Root...

2 things..
1, tail /var/log/Xorg.0.log

mine shows this at the end:
[  1478.000] (II) intel(0): Modeline "1280x800"x0.0   71.00  1280 1328 
1360 1440  800 802 808 823 -hsync -vsync (49.3 kHz eP)


maybe change to lightdm? do you have another DM ( WM?) besides KDE?? 
maybe xfce e19...

--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org

akmod-nvidia for f23 when?

[Tom Horsley]

Anyone know when an akmod-nvidia for f23 will show up on
rpmfusion? With a maxwell card, I can't get anything
but a blank screen without the binary nvidia driver
(I keep hoping nvidia and nouveau will work something
out with the firmware downloads, but nouveau still
doesn't work).
-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org

Re: dnf has -y as default now in f32?

[Tom Horsley]

On Tue, 3 Nov 2015 12:11:13 -0800
Rick Stevens wrote:

> Check your /etc/dnf/dnf.conf file and see if you have "assumeyes=true"
> set (defaults to "false").

No assumeyes in there. Maybe I just hit y in my sleep
or something :-).
-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org

Re: updated f22->f23 using dnf system-upgrade, no significant issues

[Patrick O'Callaghan]

On 3 November 2015 at 17:12, Dave Cross  wrote:

> On 3 November 2015 at 14:42, Neal Becker  wrote:
> > A boring update
>
> Yep. Completely uneventful here too. Which is good :-)
>

I wish. The update as such was uneventful, but now I can't get a login
screen.

1) Did the dnf update of 3055 packages
2) Rebooted and installed F23 with no errors
3) On booting the new system, got a low-res login (for KDE). Investigation
showed that the akmod-nvidia race condition bug is still there, so
installed kmod-nvidia by hand and rebooted.
4) Now I get a text-mode log of update progress, ending with:

[ OK] Reached target Switch Root.
 Starting Switch Root...

After which nothing happens. I tried removing the proprietary Nvidia stuff
but it didn't help. I also tried switching to GDM On 3 November 2015 at
14:42, Neal Becker  wrote:
> A boring update

Yep. Completely uneventful here too. Which is good :-)
and SDDM (my usual DM is KDM) and no difference.

There is nothing obviously wrong in journalctl.

I'm out of ideas.

poc
-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org

Re: updated f22->f23 using dnf system-upgrade, no significant issues

[Patrick O'Callaghan]

On 3 November 2015 at 20:25, Paul Cartwright  wrote:

> 2 things..
> 1, tail /var/log/Xorg.0.log
>
> mine shows this at the end:
> [  1478.000] (II) intel(0): Modeline "1280x800"x0.0   71.00  1280 1328
> 1360 1440  800 802 808 823 -hsync -vsync (49.3 kHz eP)
>
>
I see errors both with Nvidia and Nouveau. "/dev/fb0: no such file or
directory"


Aside from that, I've noticed an additional problem: /home is not being
mounted. It's a btrfs filesystem and when trying to mount it manually I get:

mount: unknown filesystem type 'btrfs'

I have btrfs-progs. This worked correctly on F22. A dnf search shows a
storaged-btrfs package which seems to be new (or at least not required in
F22) but installing it and rebooting makes no difference.

How can btrfs not work? Seriously?

poc
-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org

Re: [Fwd: Fedora 23 is here!]

[Joe Zeff]

On 11/03/2015 11:24 AM, Matthew Miller wrote:

On Wed, Nov 04, 2015 at 12:42:57AM +0530, Sudhir Khanger wrote:

>Are the common bugs resolved via updates after a release has been out for a
>few days?

Hopefully. :) It's really on a case-by-case basis some things take
longer than others to fix.




Not only that, it depends on how important the maintainer thinks it is.
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org

Re: dnf has -y as default now in f32?

[Rick Stevens]

On 11/03/2015 11:27 AM, Tom Horsley wrote:

I just installed a virtual machine from the 64 bit f23 workstation
iso file. I'm running the first "dnf update" after the install,
and it just went ahead and started doing the updates.

Didn't it used to only do that if I said -y on the command line?
(I was planning on answering yes anyway, but this seemed
kind of surprising to me).


Check your /etc/dnf/dnf.conf file and see if you have "assumeyes=true"
set (defaults to "false").

--
- Rick Stevens, Systems Engineer, AllDigitalri...@alldigital.com -
- AIM/Skype: therps2ICQ: 226437340   Yahoo: origrps2 -
--
- Real Time, adj.: Here and now, as opposed to fake time, which only -
-occurs there and then   -
--
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org

BTRFS and Nvidia broken on F23

[Patrick O'Callaghan]

(Repeating myself from another thread where this was somewhat OT)

I updated to F23 using the approved dnf method, with no errors. Now I have
an unusable system because /home is not being mounted. It's a btrfs
filesystem and when trying to mount it manually I get:

mount: unknown filesystem type 'btrfs'

I have btrfs-progs. This worked correctly on F22. A dnf search shows a
storaged-btrfs package which seems to be new (or at least not required in
F22) but installing it and rebooting makes no difference.

Booting F22 mounts /home correctly, but I have no desktop as the upgrade
removed my working akmod Nvidia stuff and for some reason Nouveau doesn't
work.

*Not* a happy camper at this point.

poc
-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org

Re: BTRFS and Nvidia broken on F23

[Tom Horsley]

On Wed, 4 Nov 2015 00:28:16 +
Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:

> Booting F22 mounts /home correctly, but I have no desktop as the upgrade
> removed my working akmod Nvidia stuff and for some reason Nouveau doesn't
> work.

This is the sort of thing that makes me always reinstall
from scratch in a virtual machine which I then copy
to a real partition :-).

Perhaps it didn't remove everything that akmod-nvidia does.
Did it leave the blacklist stuff on the kernel command line
that turns nvidia completely off? (I think it has 3 parameters
it adds, something like nouveau.modeset=0 rd.blacklist=nouveau
video=vesa:off).

Or perhaps, like me, you have a maxwell card which won't
work at all with nouveau - in that case you can get it
to boot with vesa video by using all the above kernel
parameters, but saying video=vesa:on (instead of off).

Then you can see what you are typing well enough to reinstall
the nvidia drivers for f22 from rpmfusion.
-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org

Re: BTRFS and Nvidia broken on F23

[Alchemist]

2015-11-04 2:28 GMT+02:00 Patrick O'Callaghan :

> (Repeating myself from another thread where this was somewhat OT)
>
> I updated to F23 using the approved dnf method, with no errors. Now I have
> an unusable system because /home is not being mounted. It's a btrfs
> filesystem and when trying to mount it manually I get:
>
> mount: unknown filesystem type 'btrfs'
>
> I have btrfs-progs. This worked correctly on F22. A dnf search shows a
> storaged-btrfs package which seems to be new (or at least not required in
> F22) but installing it and rebooting makes no difference.
>
> Booting F22 mounts /home correctly, but I have no desktop as the upgrade
> removed my working akmod Nvidia stuff and for some reason Nouveau doesn't
> work.
>
> *Not* a happy camper at this point.
>


Boot F23, login console mode, check

systemctl --failed
systemctl status home.mount
rpm -qa | egrep "btrfs-progs|libblockdev"
lsmod | grep btrfs

and look carefully in
journalctl -p warning


>
> poc
>
> --
> users mailing list
> users@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
> Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
> Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
>
>
-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org

Re: akmod-nvidia for f23 when?

[Tom Horsley]

On Tue, 3 Nov 2015 17:13:21 -0600
SternData wrote:

> rpmfusion isn't there yet.  No 23 under
> http://download1.rpmfusion.org/free/fedora/releases/

You can actually download the f23 repo definitions
by guessing their names given the URL of the f22
definitions, but I guess they aren't populated
yet :-).
-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org

Re: akmod-nvidia for f23 when?

[Kevin Cummings]

On 11/03/15 18:18, Tom Horsley wrote:
> On Tue, 3 Nov 2015 17:13:21 -0600
> SternData wrote:
> 
>> rpmfusion isn't there yet.  No 23 under
>> http://download1.rpmfusion.org/free/fedora/releases/

But, the 23 release rpm is ready for download:

> http://download1.rpmfusion.org/free/fedora/rpmfusion-free-release-23.noarch.rpm

and there is plenty of stuff in:

> http://download1.rpmfusion.org/free/fedora/updates/testing/23/x86_64/

You might do better to enable RPMfusion's updates-testing repos until
the main stuff is populated

> You can actually download the f23 repo definitions
> by guessing their names given the URL of the f22
> definitions, but I guess they aren't populated
> yet :-).
> 

-- 
Kevin J. Cummings
kjch...@verizon.net
cummi...@kjchome.homeip.net
cummi...@kjc386.framingham.ma.us
Registered Linux User #1232 (http://www.linuxcounter.net/)
-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org

Re: password-less ssh in F23

[Ranjan Maitra]

On Wed, 4 Nov 2015 00:34:49 +0200 Alchemist  wrote:

> 2015-11-04 0:06 GMT+02:00 Ranjan Maitra :
> 
> > A second machine is now failing to ssh in without a password only after a
> > dnf system-upgrade --releasever=23. The machines being ssh-ed into are both
> > on Fedora 22 (fully updated). But the machines that are ssh-ing in are on
> > Fedora 23 (updated via dnf).
> >
> > Is anyone else having this issue?
> >
> > I posted the output of ssh -vvv earlier this morning but please let me
> > know if additional information is needed to help me troubleshoot the
> > problem.
> >
> > Many thanks again!
> > Ranjan
> >
> >
> Which type of key do you use for auth on that host? DSA keys (not host yet)
> is deprecated now (PubkeyAcceptedKeyTypes). Check and confirm that correct
> keys are loaded ssh-add -K, or try to restart ssh agent using different
> auth socket, f.e in /var/tmp, also check each keyfile by logging in
> manually.

Thanks! I guess I used dsa and rsa keys. So what kind of keys should I get? Is 
this change/deprecation detailed anywhere? 

Many thanks again!
Ranjan


FREE 3D EARTH SCREENSAVER - Watch the Earth right on your desktop!
Check it out at http://www.inbox.com/earth


-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org

Saving current session does not work

[jd1008]

I used gnome-save-session, logged out and logged back in.
My previous session (5 apps, each with multiple windows in
several different workspaces) we not restored.
So, since I am a mate DT user, I tried mate-session-save
and logged out and back in. Still, my session was not restored.
These are all the mate packages I have installed.
Please let me know if I am missing the required package.

compiz-mate-0.8.8-29.fc22.x86_64
f21-backgrounds-extras-mate-21.1.0-1.fc22.noarch
f21-backgrounds-mate-21.1.0-1.fc22.noarch
f22-backgrounds-mate-22.1.0-1.fc22.noarch
heisenbug-backgrounds-extras-mate-20.0.0-2.fc21.noarch
heisenbug-backgrounds-mate-20.0.0-2.fc21.noarch
imsettings-mate-1.6.8-3.fc22.x86_64
mate-applet-lockkeys-0.2.3-1.fc22.x86_64
mate-applets-1.10.3-1.fc22.x86_64
mate-applet-softupd-0.4.2-1.fc22.x86_64
mate-applet-streamer-0.2.3-1.fc22.x86_64
mate-backgrounds-1.10.0-1.fc22.noarch
mate-calc-1.8.0-3.fc22.x86_64
mate-common-1.10.0-1.fc22.noarch
mate-control-center-1.10.2-1.fc22.x86_64
mate-control-center-devel-1.10.2-1.fc22.x86_64
mate-control-center-filesystem-1.10.2-1.fc22.x86_64
mate-desktop-1.10.2-1.fc22.x86_64
mate-desktop-devel-1.10.2-1.fc22.x86_64
mate-desktop-libs-1.10.2-1.fc22.x86_64
mate-dictionary-1.10.3-1.fc22.x86_64
mate-disk-usage-analyzer-1.10.3-1.fc22.x86_64
mate-icon-theme-1.10.1-1.fc22.noarch
mate-icon-theme-faenza-1.10.0-1.fc22.noarch
mate-media-1.10.0-1.fc22.x86_64
mate-menus-1.10.0-1.fc22.x86_64
mate-menus-devel-1.10.0-1.fc22.x86_64
mate-menus-libs-1.10.0-1.fc22.x86_64
mate-menus-preferences-category-menu-1.10.0-1.fc22.x86_64
mate-netspeed-1.10.2-1.fc22.x86_64
mate-notification-daemon-1.10.2-1.fc22.x86_64
mate-panel-1.10.1-1.fc22.x86_64
mate-panel-devel-1.10.1-1.fc22.x86_64
mate-panel-libs-1.10.1-1.fc22.x86_64
mate-polkit-1.10.2-1.fc22.x86_64
mate-polkit-devel-1.10.2-1.fc22.x86_64
mate-power-manager-1.10.2-1.fc22.x86_64
mate-screensaver-1.10.2-3.fc22.x86_64
mate-screensaver-devel-1.10.2-3.fc22.x86_64
mate-screenshot-1.10.3-1.fc22.x86_64
mate-search-tool-1.10.3-1.fc22.x86_64
mate-sensors-applet-1.10.4-1.fc22.x86_64
mate-sensors-applet-devel-1.10.4-1.fc22.x86_64
mate-session-manager-1.10.2-1.fc22.x86_64
mate-settings-daemon-1.10.2-1.fc22.x86_64
mate-settings-daemon-devel-1.10.2-1.fc22.x86_64
mate-system-log-1.10.3-1.fc22.x86_64
mate-system-monitor-1.10.1-1.fc22.x86_64
mate-terminal-1.10.1-2.fc22.x86_64
mate-themes-1.10.5-1.fc22.noarch
mate-themes-extras-3.16.3-2.fc22.noarch
mate-user-guide-1.10.1-1.fc22.noarch
mate-utils-1.10.3-1.fc22.x86_64
mate-utils-common-1.10.3-1.fc22.noarch
mate-utils-devel-1.10.3-1.fc22.x86_64
schroedinger-cat-backgrounds-extras-mate-18.91.0-3.fc21.noarch
schroedinger-cat-backgrounds-mate-18.91.0-3.fc21.noarch
xmonad-log-applet-mate-2.1.0-8.fc22.x86_64
xmonad-mate-0.11-13.fc22.x86_64
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org

Re: [389-users] DB account master integrated with LDAP

[Andy Spooner]

Thank you for the feedback. I will take a step back to review how we can 
engineer our setup to be efficient and manageable.

From: 
<389-users-boun...@lists.fedoraproject.org>
 on behalf of "Mayberry, Alexander" 
>
Reply-To: 
"389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org" 
<389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org>
Date: Tuesday, 3 November 2015 19:17
To: 
"389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org" 
<389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org>
Subject: Re: [389-users] DB account master integrated with LDAP

LDAP is a protocol.
Your directory is a database.

In your scenario, if "application 1" is used in this manner, it would become an 
identity management platform.  As long as this application has the ability to 
update your directory, you can do what you are suggesting.  I would caution 
you, though, with so many accounts, and no idea what your security 
considerations are, you may wish to take a long think on this one.  That's a 
lot of potentially sensitive information.  Combining an application with your 
identity management platform on the same system will increase your risks.  From 
a complexity standpoint, if your application has the ability to act as an 
identity management platform, it may also have the ability to update your 
"application 2" system directly, and eliminate the middle-man.  Or possibly 
"application 2" could be configured to auth directly to "application 1".  
Depending on what type of user management features are available in 
"application 1".

Alexander Mayberry
Enterprise Systems Engineer
SD Group: EIT Infrastructure - OMA
Enterprise.Systems Engineering.Infrastructure

From: 
389-users-boun...@lists.fedoraproject.org
 [mailto:389-users-boun...@lists.fedoraproject.org] On Behalf Of Andy Spooner
Sent: Tuesday, November 03, 2015 12:33 PM
To: 389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Subject: [389-users] DB account master integrated with LDAP

I am using ldap to share user account information across two applications. Is 
it possible to using 'Application 1' as the central reference instead of the 
LDAP server? E.g.  Application 1' holds and maintains account information, 
which updates ldap periodically. 'Application 2' will look up LDAP for account 
informations. 'Application 1' is the main system and will hold millions of 
accounts which would operate quicker from the DB without having to refer to 
LDAP for usernames, passwords, etc. 'Application2' will require a small subset 
of users to logon using credentials of users in the master database - which can 
be done via LDAP.
--
389 users mailing list
389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-users

Re: password-less ssh in F23

[Alchemist]

2015-11-04 1:53 GMT+02:00 Ranjan Maitra :

> On Wed, 4 Nov 2015 00:34:49 +0200 Alchemist  wrote:
>
> > 2015-11-04 0:06 GMT+02:00 Ranjan Maitra :
> >
> > > A second machine is now failing to ssh in without a password only
> after a
> > > dnf system-upgrade --releasever=23. The machines being ssh-ed into are
> both
> > > on Fedora 22 (fully updated). But the machines that are ssh-ing in are
> on
> > > Fedora 23 (updated via dnf).
> > >
> > > Is anyone else having this issue?
> > >
> > > I posted the output of ssh -vvv earlier this morning but please let me
> > > know if additional information is needed to help me troubleshoot the
> > > problem.
> > >
> > > Many thanks again!
> > > Ranjan
> > >
> > >
> > Which type of key do you use for auth on that host? DSA keys (not host
> yet)
> > is deprecated now (PubkeyAcceptedKeyTypes). Check and confirm that
> correct
> > keys are loaded ssh-add -K, or try to restart ssh agent using different
> > auth socket, f.e in /var/tmp, also check each keyfile by logging in
> > manually.
>
> Thanks! I guess I used dsa and rsa keys. So what kind of keys should I
> get? Is this change/deprecation detailed anywhere?
>
> Many thanks again!
> Ranjan
>

Yes it is detailed in OpenSSH 7.0 release notes. Users should drop DSA and
switch to more secure keys. So if you are using DSA for auth on that host,
try
ssh -o "PubkeyAcceptedKeyTypes ssh-dss" remote.machine



>
> 
> FREE 3D EARTH SCREENSAVER - Watch the Earth right on your desktop!
> Check it out at http://www.inbox.com/earth
>
>
> --
> users mailing list
> users@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
> Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
> Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
>
-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org

Re: password-less ssh in F23

[Ranjan Maitra]

> > > Which type of key do you use for auth on that host? DSA keys (not host
> > yet)
> > > is deprecated now (PubkeyAcceptedKeyTypes). Check and confirm that
> > correct
> > > keys are loaded ssh-add -K, or try to restart ssh agent using different
> > > auth socket, f.e in /var/tmp, also check each keyfile by logging in
> > > manually.
> >
> > Thanks! I guess I used dsa and rsa keys. So what kind of keys should I
> > get? Is this change/deprecation detailed anywhere?
> >
> > Many thanks again!
> > Ranjan
> >
> 
> Yes it is detailed in OpenSSH 7.0 release notes. Users should drop DSA and
> switch to more secure keys. So if you are using DSA for auth on that host,
> try
> ssh -o "PubkeyAcceptedKeyTypes ssh-dss" remote.machine

Thanks! I got it going with ecdsa keys. (Thanks to your tip. I would not have 
been able to figure this out otherwise.)

Best wishes,
Ranjan


FREE 3D EARTH SCREENSAVER - Watch the Earth right on your desktop!
Check it out at http://www.inbox.com/earth


-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org

Re: Firefox suddenly defaults to flash again on youtube

[Tim]

Allegedly, on or about 03 November 2015, Heinz Diehl sent:
> Where is the config option, switch or whatever changes the default
> player in firefox back to html5 again?

What's the difference between the two user profiles?  Accepting/refusing
cookies (could try clearing out the stored cookies for YouTube)?
Allowing/refusing scripting?  Flashblock options?  Logged into YouTube?

-- 
[tim@localhost ~]$ uname -rsvp
Linux 3.9.10-100.fc17.x86_64 #1 SMP Sun Jul 14 01:31:27 UTC 2013 x86_64

All mail to my mailbox is automatically deleted, there is no point
trying to privately email me, I will only read messages posted to the
public lists.


-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org

rpmbuild error on F23

[Ranjan Maitra]

Hi,

I have been having an error on F23 with rpmbuild while building my personal 
rpms. 

Here is the error I have been having. (aNu is a terminal emulator program that 
I have modified from an existing source file, ie evilvte.)


Processing files: aNu-debuginfo-0.1-1.fc23.x86_64
error: Empty %files file /home/maitra/rpmbuild/BUILD/aNu-0.1/debugfiles.list

RPM build errors:
Empty %files file /home/maitra/rpmbuild/BUILD/aNu-0.1/debugfiles.list

I guess the question is: what has changed from F22 to F23 which causes these 
errors. Here is the spec file:

Here is the files section:

%files 
%defattr(-,root,root,-)
%config(noreplace) /usr/share/icons 
/usr/share/applications 
/usr/share/man/ 
/usr/share/pixmaps
/usr/bin/showvte
/usr/bin/aNu
%doc  GPL INSTALL AUTHORS CHANGES

And I have placed the entire spec file at:

$ fpaste aNu.spec
Uploading (2.1KiB)...
WARNING: Could not shorten URL
http://paste.fedoraproject.org/286698/44661012

Any suggestions on what I should do. 

Many thanks and best wishes,
Ranjan

-- 
Important Notice: This mailbox is ignored: e-mails are set to be deleted on 
receipt. Please respond to the mailing list if appropriate. For those needing 
to send personal or professional e-mail, please use appropriate addresses.


Publish your photos in seconds for FREE
TRY IM TOOLPACK at http://www.imtoolpack.com/default.aspx?rc=if4


-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org

Re: [389-users] 389DS userPassword and Freeradius

[ozikat]

Jochen,

Great idea, I will work on Samba auth.

--
Paul Ooi



On 11/4/15 03:35, Jochen Schneider wrote:

On 03/11/15 17:08, ozikat wrote:


Read about that, just wondering anyone got it work with PassSync +
NT-Password hashed.

Or how to store the Password passed on by PassSync into plain text?

Mhhh, you can either change passwordStorageScheme to "CLEAR" (not
recomended) or write the plaintext password to another attribute and
only allow the radius bind DN to access it.
The attribute that passsync updates can be configured in the Windows
registry under "HKEY_LOCALMACHINE\Passsync\Password Field".

If you have all your accounts in AD anyway you could also use freeradius
with samba/ntlm_auth like so:
http://wiki.freeradius.org/guide/FreeRADIUS-Active-Directory-Integration-HOWTO

  J.



--
389 users mailing list
389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-users


--
389 users mailing list
389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-users

updated f22->f23 using dnf system-upgrade, no significant issues

[Neal Becker]

A boring update

-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org

Re: [389-users] 389DS userPassword and Freeradius

[Jochen Schneider]

On 03/11/15 13:36, ozikat wrote:

> Recently we would like to extend 389DS user into Radius for account
> authorization and authentication (WiFi with WPA-Enterprise, Portal and etc)
> 
> It seems like Freeradius only work with ClearText Password, i.e it
> cannot read password attribute userPassword with SHA-HASHed.
> 
> Anyone has workaround and idea on this?
> 
> We have freeradius setup, and it seems it doesnt work with MSCHAPv2 ;(

In order to use MSCHAPv2 with any combination of RADIUS daemon and LDAP
server you have to store plaintext passwords (or NT-Password Hashes) in
your backend. This is not a limitation of freeradius or 389. It's by design.
http://deployingradius.com/documents/protocols/compatibility.html

 J.



smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
--
389 users mailing list
389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-users

F23beta ----> F23

[Terry Polzin]

Seems like a non event, dnf -y update did a few packages this AM.

rpm -q fedora-release returns fedora-release-23-1.noarch,  anyone know if
this is correct?
-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org

Re: updated f22->f23 using dnf system-upgrade, no significant issues

[Ralf Corsepius]

On 11/03/2015 03:42 PM, Neal Becker wrote:

A boring update


Not for me:
# dnf system-upgrade --releasever 23 download
...
Skipping packages with broken dependencies:
 python-pexpect


What's interesting about python-pexpect is its state in the repos:
dl.fedoraproject.org/pub/fedora/linux/updates/23/SRPMS/p/python-pexpect-4.0.1-4.fc23.src.rpm
dl.fedoraproject.org/pub/fedora/linux/development/23/source/SRPMS/p/python-pexpect-3.1-4.fc23.src.rpm
dl.fedoraproject.org/pub/fedora/linux/development/23/i386/os/Packages/p/python-pexpect-3.1-4.fc23.noarch.rpm
dl.fedoraproject.org/pub/fedora/linux/development/23/x86_64/os/Packages/p/python-pexpect-3.1-4.fc23.noarch.rpm

In other words, the 23 update repos in inconsistent shape.

Ralf

--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org

Re: f21 :: dnf-yum conflicts with yum

[Jan Zelený]

On 3. 11. 2015 at 10:49:43, Adrian Sevcenco wrote:
> Hi! I am trying that, before f23 is out, to get used with dnf.
> As such i am trying to install dnf but also to install the dnf-yum layer
> (just in case my reflexes will kick in :) ) but i have an conflict with
> yum .. and if i try to remove yum is bad :)
> 
> Is there something to be done or just a fresh install of f23?
> Thank you!
> Adrian

Well, the reason for the conflict is that dnf-yum transition package provides 
/usr/bin/yum which is also provided by yum itself. In F22 and later, yum was 
renamed to yum-deprecated and can therefore coexist with dnf-yum transition 
package. What you can try is to upgrade yum to version >= 3.4.3-505. Then, 
with sufficiently new dnf, you should be able to install both at the same time.

I haven't tested this but taking the latest versions of dnf, yum and their 
dependencies should be the easiest way to do what you are trying to do.

Thanks
Jan
-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org

Re: F23beta ----> F23

[bitlord]

On Tue, 3 Nov 2015 11:08:56 -0500
Terry Polzin  wrote:

> Seems like a non event, dnf -y update did a few packages this AM.
> 
> rpm -q fedora-release returns fedora-release-23-1.noarch,  anyone
> know if this is correct?

That is OK. 
You can probably expect more updates soon (freeze is over), but it can
take some time. So you are running f23 (final). 
-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org

Problems to boot

[Frank White]

Hi,
I am a new subscriber but an old user, especially on linux.
I have some problem to boot my box because I changed some files by a live cd.
I lost my root password so tried some old method to change it. I tried
to boot in single mode but it doesn't worked. After that I change the
passwd file removing the x character ... but this has broken my box.

I have rid of the following errors on the log:
Nov  3 17:40:06 localhost dbus-daemon: Could not get password database
information for UID of current process: User "???" unknown or no
memory to allocate password entry
Nov  3 17:40:06 localhost dbus-daemon: Unknown username "root" in
message bus configuration file

Anyone know how to fix it ?
Oh the last thing, my bot does not boot property, I mean it stop at
Network manager startup and it does not give me the login prompt on
gdm or console.

Thank you.
-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org