copr-selinux dependencies Fedora 22

[Jon LaBadie]

Trying to update on F22.  DNF reports copr-selinux
version 1.40 is available to replace v1.35 but it
can not due to "broken dependencies".

rpm says "policycoreutils-python-utils" is required but not
installed.  "policycoreutils-python" is installed and dnf
says it required package is not available.

rpmfind shows the "policycoreutils-python-utils" available
for F23, but not for F22.

Suggestions for how to resolve the situation?
I don't anticipate using copr, perhaps remove it?
Do any system functions depend upon copr installation?

Jon
-- 
Jon H. LaBadie  jo...@jgcomp.com
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org

Re: audio problems

[gil]

is more similar to http://forums.debian.net/viewtopic.php?f=6=110572

regards

.g


Il 24/05/2016 21:06, stan ha scritto:

On Tue, 24 May 2016 18:37:37 +0200
gil  wrote:


i changed the old video card because was broken ... i always used the
sound card on the motherboard ... until now ...
thanks
regards
.g

I recently had problems with sound because pulseaudio was upgraded to a
new version, and I had a personal configuration file in
~/.config/pulse/daemon.conf pointing to the old library directory.

It was pointing to an old library path, and overriding the new library
path, with
dl-search-path=
Once I commented that line, everything started working.  You could try
that.

I should have thought of this sooner.

--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org

--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org

Re: audio problems

[gil]

Il 24/05/2016 20:59, Samuel Sieb ha scritto:

On 05/24/2016 09:37 AM, gil wrote:

Il 24/05/2016 18:15, Samuel Sieb ha scritto:

Did you know if you do ALT-PRTSC, it only includes the active window,
not the entire screen.


yes but dont work


Maybe it's just a Gnome feature then.


There are more controls to the right, can you get a screenshot of
those as well?  Go to the right until those arrows are gone and then
take a screenshot.


https://gil.fedorapeople.org/alsamixer1.png


Nothing obvious there...


I have noticed those, but as far as I can tell, they won't help and I
would recommend removing any changes you have made so far. ALSA is
recognizing your card and is able to play to it.  The question is

no is does not do that. recognized only that one which i dont use(less)
aka GK208 HDMI/DP Audio Controller Digital stereo


Why do you say that?  You just showed me alsamixer with the controls 
for your motherboard sound card and earlier you showed aplay playing 
to it. You also said that the kde sound settings showed the builtin 
audio as well.  It's just that there is no sound getting to the output 
jack for some reason and I'm out of ideas.



cleanup ~/.config/pulse /etc/pulse/ and re installed pulseaudio


Could you try putting the previous video card back in and see if maybe
the problem is a conflict with the new card?

i changed the old video card because was broken ... i always used the
sound card on the motherboard ... until now ...


The video card was completely dead?

yes

Do you have any other video cards you could try?

no
I'm just wondering if somehow there is a conflict between the two hda 
audio devices.  It's the only thing you changed that could have 
affected this.

the speakers remain mute
thanks
regards
.g

--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org

--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org

Re: audio problems

[gil]

Il 24/05/2016 21:06, stan ha scritto:

On Tue, 24 May 2016 18:37:37 +0200
gil  wrote:


i changed the old video card because was broken ... i always used the
sound card on the motherboard ... until now ...
thanks
regards
.g

I recently had problems with sound because pulseaudio was upgraded to a
new version, and I had a personal configuration file in
~/.config/pulse/daemon.conf pointing to the old library directory.

It was pointing to an old library path, and overriding the new library
path, with
dl-search-path=
Once I commented that line, everything started working.  You could try
that.

I should have thought of this sooner.

thanks, but it not my case
regards
.g

--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org

--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org

Re: New kernel will not boot after upgrade from fedora-21 to fedora-22

[Bill Perkins]

On 2016.05.24 15:45, Chris Murphy wrote:
> On Mon, May 23, 2016 at 11:13 PM, Bill Perkins 
> wrote:
> >
> > I have this system that I have been using that was running Fedora
> 21.
> > I just updated it today (Monday) to Fedora 22.  It is an old Dell
> > Optiplex GX620 with two 2TB disk drives set up with two partitions
> > each in a RAID One configuration.  LVM2 runs on top of the second
> > partition with several logical volumes.  This system had been
> running
> > just fine before I did the upgrade.  After the upgrade, the system
> will
> > not boot using one of the new Fedora 22 kernels.  It boots just 
> fine
> > using one of the old Fedora 21 kernels that did not get replaced
> during
> > the upgrade.
> >
> > I can get the system up using one of the new kernels, but I have to
> > wait until it stops at a Dracut prompt.  I then manual run "mdadm 
> --
> > assemble --scan" to get the RAID One partitions assembled, and "lvm
> > vgchange -a y" to get the Volume Group built.  After that, I issue
> an
> > "exit" and the system completes the boot process.  I need to figure
> out
> > why this system will not boot without intervention.  Any 
> suggestions
> > would be appreciated.
> >
> > I have tried to rebuild the initramfs with dracut, no joy doing
> that.
> >
> > Here is some of the data:
> >
> > # cat /etc/mdadm.conf
> > MAILADDR root
> > AUTO +imsm +1.x -all
> > ARRAY /dev/md0 metadata=0.90 
> UUID=c45384af:aa8fc7ca:7eebaeb8:f0ca1523
> > ARRAY /dev/md1 metadata=1.2 name=test3.localnet:md1
> > UUID=524079c6:521ca76f:126164a9:3232e116
> >
> > # cat /etc/fstab
> > UUID=5a1848ce-cff6-4c1f-a622-dc1fe5f06d55 /boot ext3 defaults 1 2
> > UUID=762b53d0-b5a0-41dc-b804-d339fa58b119 swap  swap defaults 0 0
> > /dev/mapper/vg0-lv1 /   ext4 defaults 1 1
> > /dev/mapper/vg0-lv2 /usr/local  ext4 defaults 1 2
> > /dev/mapper/vg0-lv3 /varext4 defaults 1 2
> > /dev/mapper/vg0-lv4 /tmpext4 defaults 1 2
> > /dev/mapper/vg0-lv5 /optext4 defaults 1 2
> > /dev/mapper/vg0-lv6 /home   ext4 defaults 1 2
> > /dev/mapper/vg0-lv7 /work   ext4 defaults 1 2
> > /dev/sr0/cd0auto  noauto,owner,user,ro0 0
> >
> > # uname -a
> > Linux redwood 4.4.9-200.fc22.x86_64 #1 SMP Fri May 6 17:42:20 UTC
> 2016
> > x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
> 
> Can you put up journalctl -b somewhere?
> 
> 
> -- 
> Chris Murphy
> 
> 

Chris,

This link should work:

http://roo.grnwood.net/redwood-journal-b-160524.gz

Gzip file is 692,498 bytes.  Original file is 11,702,620 bytes.

Thank you for looking at this problem.

Bill


--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org

Re: Posting to the Fedora message boards

[Ed Greshko]

On 05/25/16 04:19, Stephen Morris wrote:

Yes, slightly off topic.  So, if you have additional questions feel free to 
make direct
contact.
>
> How do you configure Tbird for the way you use the mail service (different 
> retention
> periods on folders and only downloading mail you are interested in), as 
> relative to the
> retention period of mail on the remote server, the version of Tbird I am 
> using appears
> to only provide 1 setting relative to retention on the server which I have 
> set to 7
> days, rather than as I used to have it set to, to delete when downloaded (Are 
> you
> implementing it via folder level mail rules?). Experience also indicates that 
> this
> setting doesn't work properly anyway (I haven't determined yet whether this 
> failure was
> relative to imap or pop) as the mailbox at the isp's end retained mail that 
> was
> significantly older than than the retention period threshold. I also ran into 
> the issue
> when I switched to imap that for several days afterwards I got duplicate 
> emails in my
> Tbird inbox. My isp's support guys were unable to explain why, and also not 
> explain why
> it was the all the emails that were duplicated did not physically exist in 
> their mailbox
> and emails for the same days that were not duplicated still existed in their 
> mailbox.

The email retention policy is a function available in T-Bird.  It isn't an IMAP 
server
function.

Simply right-click on any folder and select "Properties".  One of the tabs will 
be
"Retention Policy" which you can set for each folder.

I have no problems with this feature.  Changes made to the policy may not have 
immediate
effect but can be "forced" by right-clicking on the folder and selecting 
"Compact".

When you have an issue with copies of the the same email appearing in a folder 
this is
normally resolved by going to the Properties of the folder and selecting 
"Repair Folder"
on the General Information tab.

>
> How do you work around the stated functionality of imap, that if you have a 
> mail sitting
> in your inbox in Tbird and that mail is deleted from the server mailbox it is
> automatically deleted from your Tbird inbox as well. When I mentioned to my 
> isp's
> support that I wanted to retain old emails in my inbox and that functionality 
> would not
> work for me, they told me if I wanted to do that then I would have to switch 
> back to pop
> because I would not get it using Imap.?
>
I don't have this problem since if I want to delete an email from my inbox or a 
folder I
actually want to delete it.  If I wanted to delete a message that was on the 
server but
retain a copy I would simply create a folder under "Local Folders" in T-Bird 
and copy/move
the email to that folder.

-- 
You're Welcome Zachary Quinto
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org

Re: Posting to the Fedora message boards

[Patrick O'Callaghan]

On Wed, 2016-05-25 at 06:19 +1000, Stephen Morris wrote:
> How do you configure Tbird for the way you use the mail service 
> (different retention periods on folders and only downloading mail
> you 
> are interested in), as relative to the retention period of mail on
> the 
> remote server, the version of Tbird I am using appears to only
> provide 1 
> setting relative to retention on the server which I have set to 7
> days, 
> rather than as I used to have it set to, to delete when downloaded
> (Are 
> you implementing it via folder level mail rules?). Experience also 
> indicates that this setting doesn't work properly anyway (I haven't 
> determined yet whether this failure was relative to imap or pop) as
> the 
> mailbox at the isp's end retained mail that was significantly older
> than 
> than the retention period threshold. I also ran into the issue when
> I 
> switched to imap that for several days afterwards I got duplicate
> emails 
> in my Tbird inbox. My isp's support guys were unable to explain why,
> and 
> also not explain why it was the all the emails that were duplicated
> did 
> not physically exist in their mailbox and emails for the same days
> that 
> were not duplicated still existed in their mailbox.

I don't know why you're having this problem, but it has nothing to do
with IMAP per se. IMAP has no concept of a retention period. Looks like
your difficulties arise from something in your TBird configuration but
as I use Evolution I couldn't say what it is.

poc
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org

Re: Posting to the Fedora message boards

[Stephen Morris]

On 24/05/16 10:59, Ed Greshko wrote:

On 05/24/16 08:53, Ed Greshko wrote:


No.  I should have mentioned that I have a retention policy set for each list.  
Some for
30 days, some for 14.

Oh, the policy is set in my T-Bird client.   I don't think gmail itself offers 
this.

But since I use IMAP all clients I use see the same contents.

(Sorry to have left off that detail.  A bit distracted this AM)
Hi Ed, just to be a bit off topic here, I used Thunderbird as well, and 
as of the last couple of months, using Imap, mainly because of not being 
able to get pop to work when I upgraded my internet service from adsl to 
cable, and my isp not understanding that when you connect your cable 
service to a different domain to what their adsl services are connected 
to, and they create a userid in the new domain of the same name as the 
orginal one, that in Tbird to continue to use the original mailbox you 
have to add the domain name to your login credentials. Using Imap does 
not alleviate this, I just found this when I couldn't get Imap to work 
for the same reason, and the isp's support guys were of no help in 
identifying this.


How do you configure Tbird for the way you use the mail service 
(different retention periods on folders and only downloading mail you 
are interested in), as relative to the retention period of mail on the 
remote server, the version of Tbird I am using appears to only provide 1 
setting relative to retention on the server which I have set to 7 days, 
rather than as I used to have it set to, to delete when downloaded (Are 
you implementing it via folder level mail rules?). Experience also 
indicates that this setting doesn't work properly anyway (I haven't 
determined yet whether this failure was relative to imap or pop) as the 
mailbox at the isp's end retained mail that was significantly older than 
than the retention period threshold. I also ran into the issue when I 
switched to imap that for several days afterwards I got duplicate emails 
in my Tbird inbox. My isp's support guys were unable to explain why, and 
also not explain why it was the all the emails that were duplicated did 
not physically exist in their mailbox and emails for the same days that 
were not duplicated still existed in their mailbox.


How do you work around the stated functionality of imap, that if you 
have a mail sitting in your inbox in Tbird and that mail is deleted from 
the server mailbox it is automatically deleted from your Tbird inbox as 
well. When I mentioned to my isp's support that I wanted to retain old 
emails in my inbox and that functionality would not work for me, they 
told me if I wanted to do that then I would have to switch back to pop 
because I would not get it using Imap.?


regards,
Steve



--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org

[389-users] Solaris and 389-ds

[zarko]

Hi, we've been using 389-ds running on RedHat7, our ldap clients are many 
devices and RedHat Linux, now we want to add Solaris 10/11. 

We have DUAProfile created and Solaris 11 ldap client initiation was 
successful, with command : 
"ldapclient -v init -a domainname= -a profileName=solaris11 
".

The command "ldapclient list" show:
NS_LDAP_FILE_VERSION= 2.0
NS_LDAP_SERVERS= 
NS_LDAP_SEARCH_BASEDN= dc=,dc=com
NS_LDAP_SEARCH_SCOPE= sub
NS_LDAP_SEARCH_TIME= 30
NS_LDAP_CACHETTL= 43200
NS_LDAP_PROFILE= solaris11
NS_LDAP_SERVICE_SEARCH_DESC= passwd:l=AMER,dc=,dc=com?sub
NS_LDAP_SERVICE_SEARCH_DESC= shadow:l=AMER,dc=,dc=com?sub
NS_LDAP_SERVICE_SEARCH_DESC= group:ou=Groups,dc=,dc=com?sub
NS_LDAP_BIND_TIME= 10
NS_LDAP_ATTRIBUTEMAP= group:gidnumber=gidNumber
NS_LDAP_ATTRIBUTEMAP= passwd:gidnumber=gidNumber
NS_LDAP_ATTRIBUTEMAP= passwd:uidnumber=uidNumber
NS_LDAP_ATTRIBUTEMAP= passwd:homedirectory=homeDirectory
NS_LDAP_ATTRIBUTEMAP= passwd:loginshell=loginShell
NS_LDAP_ATTRIBUTEMAP= shadow:userpassword=userPassword
NS_LDAP_OBJECTCLASSMAP= shadow:shadowAccount=posixaccount
NS_LDAP_OBJECTCLASSMAP= group:posixGroup=posixgroup
NS_LDAP_OBJECTCLASSMAP= passwd:posixAccount=posixaccount

Some other relevant files' configurations are:

# grep ldap /etc/nsswitch.conf
passwd: files ldap
group:  files ldap
netgroup:   ldap
automount:  files ldap
printers:   user files ldap


# cat /etc/pam.d/login
authrequisite   pam_authtok_get.so.1debug
authrequiredpam_dhkeys.so.1 debug
authrequiredpam_unix_cred.so.1  debug
#auth   binding pam_unix_auth.so.1  server_policy
authsufficient  pam_unix_auth.so.1  server_policy   debug
authrequiredpam_ldap.so.1   debug


# cat /etc/pam.d/other | grep -v ^# | grep -v ^$
authdefinitive  pam_user_policy.so.1debug
authrequisite   pam_authtok_get.so.1debug
authrequiredpam_dhkeys.so.1 debug
authrequiredpam_unix_cred.so.1  debug
authsufficient  pam_unix_auth.so.1  server_policy   debug
authrequiredpam_ldap.so.1   debug
account requisite   pam_roles.so.1
account definitive  pam_user_policy.so.1
account requiredpam_unix_account.so.1
account requiredpam_tsol_account.so.1
session definitive  pam_user_policy.so.1
session requiredpam_unix_session.so.1
passworddefinitive  pam_user_policy.so.1
passwordinclude pam_authtok_common
passwordrequiredpam_authtok_store.so.1

Unfortunately, LDAP client cannot SSH, the logs are

 sshd[2497]: [ID 293258 auth.warning] libsldap: Status: 50  Mesg: LDAP ERROR 
(50): Insufficient access.
 sshd[2497]: [ID 717705 auth.debug] pam_user_policy: pam_sm_authenticate(flags 
= 0x1, argc = 1)
 sshd[2497]: [ID 771769 auth.debug] pam_user_policy: find_pam_policy: 
pam_policy = NULL for user 'zare'
 sshd[2497]: [ID 634615 auth.debug] pam_authtok_get:pam_sm_authenticate: flags 
= 1
 sshd[2497]: [ID 896952 auth.debug] pam_unix_auth: entering 
pam_sm_authenticate()
 sshd[2497]: [ID 285619 auth.debug] ldap pam_sm_authenticate(sshd-kbdint zare), 
flags = 1
 sshd[2497]: [ID 316739 auth.error] pam_ldap: no legal authentication method 
configured
 sshd[2497]: [ID 800047 auth.info] Keyboard-interactive (PAM) userauth 
failed[9] while authenticating: Authentication failed
 sshd[2497]: [ID 800047 auth.notice] Failed keyboard-interactive for zdudic 
from 10.211.55.1 port 52876 ssh2
 sshd[2497]: [ID 717705 auth.debug] pam_user_policy: pam_sm_authenticate(flags 
= 0x1, argc = 1)
 sshd[2497]: [ID 771769 auth.debug] pam_user_policy: find_pam_policy: 
pam_policy = NULL for user 'zare'
 sshd[2497]: [ID 634615 auth.debug] pam_authtok_get:pam_sm_authenticate: flags 
= 1


Any help is appreciated, thanks. 
--
389-users mailing list
389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: lost sound -

[Bob Goodwin]

On 05/24/16 15:24, Samuel Sieb wrote:

On 05/24/2016 12:16 PM, Bob Goodwin wrote:

[bobg@Box10 ~]$ rpm -qV pulseaudio
missing /usr/lib64/pulse-7.1/modules/libalsa-util.so

There's your answer.  Somehow that file got deleted.  "dnf reinstall 
pulseaudio" and you should be fine.

--

+

Good, "dnf reinstall pulseaudio" fixed the problem. I had to reboot for 
it to be effective.


I can't imagine what I might have done to break that. I dnf removed and 
reinstalled Balsa a few times, other than that perhaps something that 
happened with a dnf upgrade?


Thunderbird filters my messages and I have recorded announcements that 
tell me who sent a message so I can hear who it is and judge if it needs 
an immediate response when I am not here at the computer. Works well for 
me ...


I will add this to my notes.

Thanks much,

Bob


--
Bob Goodwin - Zuni, Virginia, USA
http://www.qrz.com/db/W2BOD
box10  FEDORA-23/64bit LINUX XFCE POP3
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org

Re: New kernel will not boot after upgrade from fedora-21 to fedora-22

[Chris Murphy]

On Mon, May 23, 2016 at 11:13 PM, Bill Perkins  wrote:
>
> I have this system that I have been using that was running Fedora 21.
> I just updated it today (Monday) to Fedora 22.  It is an old Dell
> Optiplex GX620 with two 2TB disk drives set up with two partitions
> each in a RAID One configuration.  LVM2 runs on top of the second
> partition with several logical volumes.  This system had been running
> just fine before I did the upgrade.  After the upgrade, the system will
> not boot using one of the new Fedora 22 kernels.  It boots just fine
> using one of the old Fedora 21 kernels that did not get replaced during
> the upgrade.
>
> I can get the system up using one of the new kernels, but I have to
> wait until it stops at a Dracut prompt.  I then manual run "mdadm --
> assemble --scan" to get the RAID One partitions assembled, and "lvm
> vgchange -a y" to get the Volume Group built.  After that, I issue an
> "exit" and the system completes the boot process.  I need to figure out
> why this system will not boot without intervention.  Any suggestions
> would be appreciated.
>
> I have tried to rebuild the initramfs with dracut, no joy doing that.
>
> Here is some of the data:
>
> # cat /etc/mdadm.conf
> MAILADDR root
> AUTO +imsm +1.x -all
> ARRAY /dev/md0 metadata=0.90 UUID=c45384af:aa8fc7ca:7eebaeb8:f0ca1523
> ARRAY /dev/md1 metadata=1.2 name=test3.localnet:md1
> UUID=524079c6:521ca76f:126164a9:3232e116
>
> # cat /etc/fstab
> UUID=5a1848ce-cff6-4c1f-a622-dc1fe5f06d55 /boot ext3 defaults 1 2
> UUID=762b53d0-b5a0-41dc-b804-d339fa58b119 swap  swap defaults 0 0
> /dev/mapper/vg0-lv1 /   ext4 defaults 1 1
> /dev/mapper/vg0-lv2 /usr/local  ext4 defaults 1 2
> /dev/mapper/vg0-lv3 /varext4 defaults 1 2
> /dev/mapper/vg0-lv4 /tmpext4 defaults 1 2
> /dev/mapper/vg0-lv5 /optext4 defaults 1 2
> /dev/mapper/vg0-lv6 /home   ext4 defaults 1 2
> /dev/mapper/vg0-lv7 /work   ext4 defaults 1 2
> /dev/sr0/cd0auto  noauto,owner,user,ro0 0
>
> # uname -a
> Linux redwood 4.4.9-200.fc22.x86_64 #1 SMP Fri May 6 17:42:20 UTC 2016
> x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux

Can you put up journalctl -b somewhere?


-- 
Chris Murphy
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org

Re: lost sound -

[stan]

On Tue, 24 May 2016 15:30:15 -0400
Bob Goodwin  wrote:

> This was the closest thing I could find:
> 
> [bobg@Box10 ~]$ locate pulse/daemon.conf
> /etc/pulse/daemon.conf

That's the system file.  It seems you don't have a personal
configuration file, so my idea doesn't apply to you.

To be absolutely sure, do   
ls -an ~/.config/pulse
If it's empty, you don't have it.

But given that you were missing one of the libraries that pulse
expected to find, you should consider doing a reinstall of pulseaudio
to see if it will pick up that missing library.

dnf reinstall pulseaudio

If it's still not there, this seems to be a packaging error, and you
should open a bugzilla against pulseaudio.  What happens if you run the
locate command on libalsa-util.so?
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org

Re: lost sound -

[Bob Goodwin]

On 05/24/16 15:01, stan wrote:

I recently had problems with sound because pulseaudio was upgraded to a
new version, and I had a personal configuration file in
~/.config/pulse/daemon.conf pointing to the old library directory.

It was pointing to an old library path, and overriding the new library
path, with
dl-search-path=
Once I commented that line, everything started working.  You could try
that.

Failing that, there has been a recent thread about things to try when
sound isn't working in this mailing list, called 'audio problems'.  You
could read that, and try those suggestions.
--

+

This was the closest thing I could find:

[bobg@Box10 ~]$ locate pulse/daemon.conf
/etc/pulse/daemon.conf

[bobg@Box10 ~]$ cat /etc/pulse/daemon.conf
# This file is part of PulseAudio.

it's a long file, I didn't see anything like the situation you described 
but, would I recognize a problem? Maybe not ...


Yes, I was trying some of the things in the 'audio problems' thread ...

--
Bob Goodwin - Zuni, Virginia, USA
http://www.qrz.com/db/W2BOD
box10  FEDORA-23/64bit LINUX XFCE POP3
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org

Re: lost sound -

[Samuel Sieb]

On 05/24/2016 12:16 PM, Bob Goodwin wrote:

[bobg@Box10 ~]$ rpm -qV pulseaudio
missing /usr/lib64/pulse-7.1/modules/libalsa-util.so

There's your answer.  Somehow that file got deleted.  "dnf reinstall 
pulseaudio" and you should be fine.

--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org

Re: lost sound -

[Bob Goodwin]

On 05/24/16 15:04, Samuel Sieb wrote:

On 05/24/2016 11:15 AM, Bob Goodwin wrote:

Additional information from journalctl:

May 24 12:29:08 Box10 pulseaudio[1776]: [pulseaudio] ltdl-bind-now.c:
Failed to open module /usr/lib64/pulse-7.1/modules/module-alsa-card.so:
libalsa-util.so: cannot open shared object file: No such file or 
directory


What is the output of the following commands?
rpm -q pulseaudio
rpm -qV pulseaudio
rpm -qf /usr/lib64/pulse-7.1/modules/libalsa-util.so
ls -l /usr/lib64/pulse-7.1/modules/libalsa-util.so
--

+

[bobg@Box10 ~]$ rpm -q pulseaudio
pulseaudio-7.1-1.fc23.1.x86_64

[bobg@Box10 ~]$ rpm -qV pulseaudio
missing /usr/lib64/pulse-7.1/modules/libalsa-util.so

[bobg@Box10 ~]$ rpm -qf /usr/lib64/pulse-7.1/modules/libalsa-util.so
pulseaudio-7.1-1.fc23.1.x86_64

[bobg@Box10 ~]$ ls -l /usr/lib64/pulse-7.1/modules/libalsa-util.so
ls: cannot access /usr/lib64/pulse-7.1/modules/libalsa-util.so: No such 
file or directory


--
Bob Goodwin - Zuni, Virginia, USA
http://www.qrz.com/db/W2BOD
box10  FEDORA-23/64bit LINUX XFCE POP3
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org

Re: audio problems

[stan]

On Tue, 24 May 2016 18:37:37 +0200
gil  wrote:

> i changed the old video card because was broken ... i always used the 
> sound card on the motherboard ... until now ...
> thanks
> regards
> .g

I recently had problems with sound because pulseaudio was upgraded to a
new version, and I had a personal configuration file in
~/.config/pulse/daemon.conf pointing to the old library directory.

It was pointing to an old library path, and overriding the new library
path, with
dl-search-path=
Once I commented that line, everything started working.  You could try
that.  

I should have thought of this sooner.

--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org

Re: lost sound -

[Samuel Sieb]

On 05/24/2016 11:15 AM, Bob Goodwin wrote:

Additional information from journalctl:

May 24 12:29:08 Box10 pulseaudio[1776]: [pulseaudio] ltdl-bind-now.c:
Failed to open module /usr/lib64/pulse-7.1/modules/module-alsa-card.so:
libalsa-util.so: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory


What is the output of the following commands?
rpm -q pulseaudio
rpm -qV pulseaudio
rpm -qf /usr/lib64/pulse-7.1/modules/libalsa-util.so
ls -l /usr/lib64/pulse-7.1/modules/libalsa-util.so
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org

Re: lost sound -

[stan]

On Tue, 24 May 2016 14:15:58 -0400
Bob Goodwin  wrote:

> On 05/24/16 12:42, Bob Goodwin wrote:
> > I lost my sound in this F-23 computer a few days ago which causes
> > some inconvenience.
> >
> > PulseAudio volume control shows signal in Output but Configuration 
> > shows "No card available for configuration."
> >
> > Any help appreciated,

I recently had problems with sound because pulseaudio was upgraded to a
new version, and I had a personal configuration file in
~/.config/pulse/daemon.conf pointing to the old library directory.

It was pointing to an old library path, and overriding the new library
path, with
dl-search-path=
Once I commented that line, everything started working.  You could try
that.

Failing that, there has been a recent thread about things to try when
sound isn't working in this mailing list, called 'audio problems'.  You
could read that, and try those suggestions.
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org

Re: audio problems

[Samuel Sieb]

On 05/24/2016 09:37 AM, gil wrote:

Il 24/05/2016 18:15, Samuel Sieb ha scritto:

Did you know if you do ALT-PRTSC, it only includes the active window,
not the entire screen.


yes but dont work


Maybe it's just a Gnome feature then.


There are more controls to the right, can you get a screenshot of
those as well?  Go to the right until those arrows are gone and then
take a screenshot.


https://gil.fedorapeople.org/alsamixer1.png


Nothing obvious there...


I have noticed those, but as far as I can tell, they won't help and I
would recommend removing any changes you have made so far.  ALSA is
recognizing your card and is able to play to it.  The question is

no is does not do that. recognized only that one which i dont use(less)
aka GK208 HDMI/DP Audio Controller Digital stereo


Why do you say that?  You just showed me alsamixer with the controls for 
your motherboard sound card and earlier you showed aplay playing to it. 
You also said that the kde sound settings showed the builtin audio as 
well.  It's just that there is no sound getting to the output jack for 
some reason and I'm out of ideas.



Could you try putting the previous video card back in and see if maybe
the problem is a conflict with the new card?

i changed the old video card because was broken ... i always used the
sound card on the motherboard ... until now ...


The video card was completely dead?  Do you have any other video cards 
you could try?  I'm just wondering if somehow there is a conflict 
between the two hda audio devices.  It's the only thing you changed that 
could have affected this.

--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org

Re: lost sound -

[Bob Goodwin]

On 05/24/16 12:42, Bob Goodwin wrote:
I lost my sound in this F-23 computer a few days ago which causes some 
inconvenience.


PulseAudio volume control shows signal in Output but Configuration 
shows "No card available for configuration."


Any help appreciated,

Bob


+
Additional information from journalctl:

[root@Box10 bobg]# journalctl -f -p warning
-- Logs begin at Tue 2015-09-22 15:47:16 EDT. --
May 24 12:29:05 Box10 org.a11y.atspi.Registry[1679]: Xlib: extension 
"XEVIE" missing on display ":0".
May 24 12:29:08 Box10 org.gnome.OnlineAccounts[1427]: 
goa-daemon-Message: goa-daemon version 3.18.4 starting
May 24 12:29:08 Box10 pulseaudio[1776]: [pulseaudio] ltdl-bind-now.c: 
Failed to open module /usr/lib64/pulse-7.1/modules/module-alsa-card.so: 
libalsa-util.so: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory
May 24 12:29:08 Box10 pulseaudio[1776]: [pulseaudio] module.c: Failed to 
open module "module-alsa-card".
May 24 12:29:08 Box10 pulseaudio[1776]: [pulseaudio] ltdl-bind-now.c: 
Failed to open module /usr/lib64/pulse-7.1/modules/module-alsa-card.so: 
libalsa-util.so: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory
May 24 12:29:08 Box10 pulseaudio[1776]: [pulseaudio] module.c: Failed to 
open module "module-alsa-card".
May 24 12:29:09 Box10 pulseaudio[1836]: [pulseaudio] pid.c: Daemon 
already running.
May 24 12:29:09 Box10 org.gnome.Identity[1427]: (process:1833): 
libgoaidentity-WARNING **: GoaKerberosIdentityManager: Using polling for 
change notification for credential cache type 'KEYRING'
May 24 12:29:33 Box10 pulseaudio[1776]: [pulseaudio] bluez5-util.c: 
GetManagedObjects() failed: org.freedesktop.DBus.Error.NoReply: Did not 
receive a reply. Possible causes include: the remote application did not 
send a reply, the message bus security policy blocked the reply, the 
reply timeout expired, or the network connection was broken.
May 24 13:29:13 Box10 org.gnome.evolution.dataserver.Sources5[1427]: ** 
(evolution-source-registry:1938): WARNING **: 
secret_service_search_sync: must specify at least one attribute to match


--
Bob Goodwin - Zuni, Virginia, USA
http://www.qrz.com/db/W2BOD
box10  FEDORA-23/64bit LINUX XFCE POP3
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org

Re: Posting to the Fedora message boards

[Mike Wright]

On 05/24/2016 09:46 AM, Tom Horsley wrote:

On Tue, 24 May 2016 10:53:01 -0400
Paul W. Frields wrote:


later we hope to give
you the option to see more of what you like, and less of what you
don't.


Like maybe getting the plain text message bodies rendered in fixed width
fonts so code snippits and such come out displayed reasonably?


+1 - especially since they may contain code or command examples
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org

Re: Posting to the Fedora message boards

[Tom Horsley]

On Tue, 24 May 2016 10:53:01 -0400
Paul W. Frields wrote:

> later we hope to give
> you the option to see more of what you like, and less of what you
> don't.

Like maybe getting the plain text message bodies rendered in fixed width
fonts so code snippits and such come out displayed reasonably?
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org

lost sound -

[Bob Goodwin]

I lost my sound in this F-23 computer a few days ago which causes some 
inconvenience.


PulseAudio volume control shows signal in Output but Configuration shows 
"No card available for configuration."


Any help appreciated,

Bob

--
Bob Goodwin - Zuni, Virginia, USA
http://www.qrz.com/db/W2BOD
box10  FEDORA-23/64bit LINUX XFCE POP3
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org

Re: audio problems

[gil]

Il 24/05/2016 18:15, Samuel Sieb ha scritto:

On 05/24/2016 09:01 AM, gil wrote:

Il 24/05/2016 17:47, Samuel Sieb ha scritto:

On 05/24/2016 07:43 AM, gil wrote:

Il 24/05/2016 16:04, stan ha scritto:
If you do an  alsamixer -c 0  , and look at master, is there MM at 
the

bottom?  If there is, press M to unmute, and try again. That unmutes
the output in alsa, whereas the other is for pulse.

master is at the max value and have 00 at the bottom.


That should not be possible, but would explain the problem. What
happens if you try to change the volume?


nothing is happening


I think you missed a "1" in the previous message.  The number is 
"100", not "00". :-)



Can you get a screenshot of alsamixer?

https://gil.fedorapeople.org/alsamixer.png


Did you know if you do ALT-PRTSC, it only includes the active window, 
not the entire screen.



yes but dont work
There are more controls to the right, can you get a screenshot of 
those as well?  Go to the right until those arrows are gone and then 
take a screenshot.



https://gil.fedorapeople.org/alsamixer1.png
I assume you plugged the speakers into the same jack they were in 
before, but can you double-check?  Most motherboards have several 
audio jacks now and it's easy to plug into the wrong one.  Also, the 
front middle output is muted, try bringing that up as well.



yes, labelled as "line out"

sorry for the question but you have noticed all my changes to resolve
this problem (/etc/*)?


I have noticed those, but as far as I can tell, they won't help and I 
would recommend removing any changes you have made so far. ALSA is 
recognizing your card and is able to play to it.  The question is 
no is does not do that. recognized only that one which i dont use(less) 
aka GK208 HDMI/DP Audio Controller Digital stereo

just why is there no sound coming out?

Could you try putting the previous video card back in and see if maybe 
the problem is a conflict with the new card?
i changed the old video card because was broken ... i always used the 
sound card on the motherboard ... until now ...

thanks
regards
.g

--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org


--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org

Re: audio problems

[Samuel Sieb]

On 05/24/2016 09:01 AM, gil wrote:

Il 24/05/2016 17:47, Samuel Sieb ha scritto:

On 05/24/2016 07:43 AM, gil wrote:

Il 24/05/2016 16:04, stan ha scritto:

If you do an  alsamixer -c 0  , and look at master, is there MM at the
bottom?  If there is, press M to unmute, and try again.  That unmutes
the output in alsa, whereas the other is for pulse.

master is at the max value and have 00 at the bottom.


That should not be possible, but would explain the problem.  What
happens if you try to change the volume?


nothing is happening


I think you missed a "1" in the previous message.  The number is "100", 
not "00". :-)



Can you get a screenshot of alsamixer?

https://gil.fedorapeople.org/alsamixer.png


Did you know if you do ALT-PRTSC, it only includes the active window, 
not the entire screen.


There are more controls to the right, can you get a screenshot of those 
as well?  Go to the right until those arrows are gone and then take a 
screenshot.


I assume you plugged the speakers into the same jack they were in 
before, but can you double-check?  Most motherboards have several audio 
jacks now and it's easy to plug into the wrong one.  Also, the front 
middle output is muted, try bringing that up as well.



sorry for the question but you have noticed all my changes to resolve
this problem (/etc/*)?


I have noticed those, but as far as I can tell, they won't help and I 
would recommend removing any changes you have made so far.  ALSA is 
recognizing your card and is able to play to it.  The question is just 
why is there no sound coming out?


Could you try putting the previous video card back in and see if maybe 
the problem is a conflict with the new card?

--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org

Re: audio problems

[gil]

Il 24/05/2016 17:47, Samuel Sieb ha scritto:

On 05/24/2016 07:43 AM, gil wrote:

Il 24/05/2016 16:04, stan ha scritto:

If you do an  alsamixer -c 0  , and look at master, is there MM at the
bottom?  If there is, press M to unmute, and try again.  That unmutes
the output in alsa, whereas the other is for pulse.

master is at the max value and have 00 at the bottom.

That should not be possible, but would explain the problem.  What 
happens if you try to change the volume?



nothing is happening

Can you get a screenshot of alsamixer?

https://gil.fedorapeople.org/alsamixer.png
sorry for the question but you have noticed all my changes to resolve 
this problem (/etc/*)?

regards
.g

--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org

--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org

Re: audio problems

[Samuel Sieb]

On 05/24/2016 07:43 AM, gil wrote:

Il 24/05/2016 16:04, stan ha scritto:

If you do an  alsamixer -c 0  , and look at master, is there MM at the
bottom?  If there is, press M to unmute, and try again.  That unmutes
the output in alsa, whereas the other is for pulse.

master is at the max value and have 00 at the bottom.

That should not be possible, but would explain the problem.  What 
happens if you try to change the volume?


Can you get a screenshot of alsamixer?
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org

Re: Posting to the Fedora message boards

[Peter G.]

Tim wrote:

> As far as I'm
> concerned, they're only of use for someone who wants to 
solve a
> particular problem, and not be part of any on-going 
participation.

I participate where I think my input could be useful, but Iǘe 
learned to stay out of conversations where the extent of my 
knowledge isn't going to add to the conversation. As such, 
aside from some newbie help and testing feedback, my use is 
primarily for problem-solving h/t

Yes, I think Hyperkitty has potential, PWF :-) I like the FAS 
account (I've had one for years, but there is getting to be a 
bit more that one can do with the login :-)
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org

Re: Balsa -

[Bob Goodwin]

On 05/22/16 05:05, Tim wrote:

Tim:

>>I've uploaded some screenshots from my installation, here:
>>http://imgur.com/a/f11EE

+

I have tried to respond to this message a number of times without 
success due, at least in part, to problems with my ISP's email system, 
presently when I try to send that particular responding message to the 
list via gmail instead of the Wildblue.net I get:


"Technical details of permanent failure:
Google tried to deliver your message, but it was rejected by the server for the 
recipient domain wildblue.net by mx.wildblue.net. [69.168.102.194].

The error that the other server returned was:
554 5.7.1 [P4] Message blocked due to spam content in the message."

It appears the "spam" is the url's for several screenshots I included in my 
message.

When sent via Wildblue there is no error message, apparently it is just spam 
and dumped without notice.

In addition I found that they had disabled my e-mail account which lead to 
problems with my list subscription, the whole mess has been a nightmare with a 
lot of time spent on the telephone. There has been no explanation for any of 
this.

I am still interested in making balsa work and will get back to it eventually.

Bob


--
Bob Goodwin - Zuni, Virginia, USA
http://www.qrz.com/db/W2BOD
box10  FEDORA-23/64bit LINUX XFCE POP3
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org

Re: Posting to the Fedora message boards

[Paul W. Frields]

On Mon, May 23, 2016 at 07:56:28PM -, Peter Gueckel wrote:
> While a long-time user, I never liked getting all of the messages in
> my email box, considering that only 5% or so are relevant to me. The
> digest form has the additional problem of how to reply to a
> post. Then, I discovered Gmane a few years back.I was bothered
> somewhat by using a third party interface and, it seemed, that not
> 100% of the posts ever showed up, depending on who posted where. It
> has worked well for me, but I had to set up the news program,
> typically knode, which also took a fair bit of time. Nothing ever
> seemed satisfactory.
> 
> This morning I discovered Fedora's own web interface. I never even
> knew it existed!!! I think it could be the best solution
> yet... although sometimes it seems slow.

I'm assuming you mean Hyperkitty, for example via this very thread:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org/thread/EMTHXHLEKP3KAAEX3433KKKINLZAW4WO/

> What have you found to be he easiest, most convenient, etc. method
> of accessing the message boards?

This really differs by person.  The great thing about Hyperkitty is it
doesn't change the use of email for those who prefer that old school
method.  In fact, I'm writing a response to you right now on Mutt, my
text based email client, where I read mail and compose replies.

But I could just as easily login to Hyperkitty, and compose a reply
there.  There are also ways to rank messages; later we hope to give
you the option to see more of what you like, and less of what you
don't.

-- 
Paul W. Frieldshttp://paul.frields.org/
  gpg fingerprint: 3DA6 A0AC 6D58 FEC4 0233  5906 ACDB C937 BD11 3717
  http://redhat.com/   -  -  -  -   http://pfrields.fedorapeople.org/
The open source story continues to grow: http://opensource.com
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org

Re: audio problems

[gil]

Il 24/05/2016 16:04, stan ha scritto:

On Tue, 24 May 2016 09:09:22 +0200
gil  wrote:


Il 24/05/2016 08:49, Samuel Sieb ha scritto:

On 05/23/2016 03:13 PM, gil wrote:

$ aplay -D plughw:0,0 /usr/share/sounds/purple/alert.wav
Playing WAVE '/usr/share/sounds/purple/alert.wav' : Signed 16 bit
Little Endian, Rate 22050 Hz, Mono
$ aplay -D plughw:0,1 /usr/share/sounds/purple/alert.wav
Playing WAVE '/usr/share/sounds/purple/alert.wav' : Signed 16 bit
Little Endian, Rate 22050 Hz, Mono
$ aplay -D plughw:1,3 /usr/share/sounds/purple/alert.wav
Playing WAVE '/usr/share/sounds/purple/alert.wav' : Signed 16 bit
Little Endian, Rate 22050 Hz, Mono
$ aplay -D plughw:1,7 /usr/share/sounds/purple/alert.wav
Playing WAVE '/usr/share/sounds/purple/alert.wav' : Signed 16 bit
Little Endian, Rate 22050 Hz, Mono
  

Did you hear anything from any of these?  The first one should have
played the sound.

No I have heard nothing.
speakers level are set at max value

alsa is working fine.  So, this is a configuration issue.

Is max you mention for the pulse setting that shows a single bar when
running alsamixer?

Hi
yes but now point to SBx00 Azalia, but again no sound

If you do an  alsamixer -c 0  , and look at master, is there MM at the
bottom?  If there is, press M to unmute, and try again.  That unmutes
the output in alsa, whereas the other is for pulse.

master is at the max value and have 00 at the bottom.

i edit /etc/modprobe.d/soundcard.conf
now have this content/s

alias snd-card-0 snd-hda-intel
alias sound-slot-0 snd-hda-intel
options snd-hda-intel index=0 model=auto vid=1002 pid=4383

vid and pid take by
$  lspci -nn |grep -i audio
00:14.2 Audio device [0403]: Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. [AMD/ATI] 
SBx00 Azalia (Intel HDA) [1002:4383] (rev 40)
04:00.1 Audio device [0403]: NVIDIA Corporation GK208 HDMI/DP Audio 
Controller [10de:0e0f] (rev a1)


thanks
.g

--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org

--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org

Re: audio problems

[stan]

On Tue, 24 May 2016 09:09:22 +0200
gil  wrote:

> Il 24/05/2016 08:49, Samuel Sieb ha scritto:
> > On 05/23/2016 03:13 PM, gil wrote:  
> >> $ aplay -D plughw:0,0 /usr/share/sounds/purple/alert.wav
> >> Playing WAVE '/usr/share/sounds/purple/alert.wav' : Signed 16 bit
> >> Little Endian, Rate 22050 Hz, Mono
> >> $ aplay -D plughw:0,1 /usr/share/sounds/purple/alert.wav
> >> Playing WAVE '/usr/share/sounds/purple/alert.wav' : Signed 16 bit
> >> Little Endian, Rate 22050 Hz, Mono
> >> $ aplay -D plughw:1,3 /usr/share/sounds/purple/alert.wav
> >> Playing WAVE '/usr/share/sounds/purple/alert.wav' : Signed 16 bit
> >> Little Endian, Rate 22050 Hz, Mono
> >> $ aplay -D plughw:1,7 /usr/share/sounds/purple/alert.wav
> >> Playing WAVE '/usr/share/sounds/purple/alert.wav' : Signed 16 bit
> >> Little Endian, Rate 22050 Hz, Mono
> >>  
> > Did you hear anything from any of these?  The first one should have 
> > played the sound.  
> No I have heard nothing.
> speakers level are set at max value

alsa is working fine.  So, this is a configuration issue.

Is max you mention for the pulse setting that shows a single bar when
running alsamixer?

If you do an  alsamixer -c 0  , and look at master, is there MM at the
bottom?  If there is, press M to unmute, and try again.  That unmutes
the output in alsa, whereas the other is for pulse.
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org

Re: Posting to the Fedora message boards

[maderios]

On 05/23/2016 09:56 PM, Peter Gueckel wrote:

What have you found to be he easiest, most convenient, etc. method of accessing 
the message boards?

Hi
I use gmail imap account with thunderbird, it works fine.

--
Maderios
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org

Re: Posting to the Fedora message boards

[Tim]

On Mon, 2016-05-23 at 19:56 +, Peter Gueckel wrote:
> I discovered Gmane a few years back.I was bothered somewhat by using a
> third party interface and, it seemed, that not 100% of the posts ever
> showed up, depending on who posted where. It has worked well for me,
> but I had to set up the news program, typically knode, which also took
> a fair bit of time.

I can't see that setting up gmail and filtering is going to be any
*easier* than using a news client with a news server (like gmane).  But
it *may* be more practical, if it gives you a better searching ability.

For what it's worth, I always found usenet the most practical for the
kind of thing this mailing list does.  News clients tended to be geared
towards handling masses of mail (proper threading, auto purging,
ignoring, watching, etc), most mail clients are awful at it, and awful
at quoting.  And usenet doesn't require you to expose an email address
to abuse.

Websites are a pain, you can manage the odd one, but having to
separately log into several different websites to keep abreast of a
number of things is a major chore.  And you have to deal with designers
who like to continuously re-engineer the service.  As far as I'm
concerned, they're only of use for someone who wants to solve a
particular problem, and not be part of any on-going participation.


-- 
tim@localhost ~]$ uname -rsvp

Linux 3.19.8-100.fc20.i686 #1 SMP Tue May 12 17:42:35 UTC 2015 i686

All mail to my mailbox is automatically deleted, there is no point trying
to privately email me, I will only read messages posted to the public lists.

George Orwell's '1984' was supposed to be a warning against tyranny, not
a set of instructions for supposedly democratic governments.
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org

Re: Posting to the Fedora message boards

[Patrick O'Callaghan]

On Mon, 2016-05-23 at 18:23 -0600, Peter G.  wrote:
> I'll look into how IMAP might help me manage it all. Gmail 
> claims they 'do' mailing lists, so maybe there's a way to 
> make it do what I want.

Gmail don't do mailing lists in the sense we usually mean here. They
have something called Google Groups, which is fairly different.

That said, I access Gmail via IMAP and use Evolution to read my mailing
lists, which works fine.

poc
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org

strange behaviour of yumex-dnf

[Antonio M]

during last few days when I try to update/install/remove any package by
graphical interface I get:

g-io-error-quark:
GDBus.Error:org.freedesktop.DBus.Python.AttributeError: Traceback
(most recent call last):
  File "/usr/lib64/python3.4/site-packages/dbus/service.py", line 707,
in _message_cb
retval = candidate_method(self, *args, **keywords)
  File "/usr/lib/python3.4/site-packages/dnfdaemon/server/__init__.py",
line 83, in newFunc
rc = func(*args, **kwargs)
  File "/usr/share/dnfdaemon/dnfdaemon-system", line 537, in RunTransaction
result = self.run_transaction()
  File "/usr/lib/python3.4/site-packages/dnfdaemon/server/__init__.py",
line 564, in run_transaction
self._check_gpg_signatures(to_dnl)
  File "/usr/lib/python3.4/site-packages/dnfdaemon/server/__init__.py",
line 713, in _check_gpg_signatures
result, errmsg = self.base.sigCheckPkg(po)
  File "/usr/lib/python3.4/site-packages/dnf/util.py", line 79, in __getattr__
% (C.__name__, name))
AttributeError: 'Base' object has no attribute 'sigCheckPkg'
 (36)

what's going on??

Anyway I files a bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1339107




Antonio Montagnani

Linux Fedora 23 (Workstation)
inviato da Gmail
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org

Re: audio problems

[gil]

Il 24/05/2016 08:49, Samuel Sieb ha scritto:

On 05/23/2016 03:13 PM, gil wrote:

$ aplay -D plughw:0,0 /usr/share/sounds/purple/alert.wav
Playing WAVE '/usr/share/sounds/purple/alert.wav' : Signed 16 bit Little
Endian, Rate 22050 Hz, Mono
$ aplay -D plughw:0,1 /usr/share/sounds/purple/alert.wav
Playing WAVE '/usr/share/sounds/purple/alert.wav' : Signed 16 bit Little
Endian, Rate 22050 Hz, Mono
$ aplay -D plughw:1,3 /usr/share/sounds/purple/alert.wav
Playing WAVE '/usr/share/sounds/purple/alert.wav' : Signed 16 bit Little
Endian, Rate 22050 Hz, Mono
$ aplay -D plughw:1,7 /usr/share/sounds/purple/alert.wav
Playing WAVE '/usr/share/sounds/purple/alert.wav' : Signed 16 bit Little
Endian, Rate 22050 Hz, Mono

Did you hear anything from any of these?  The first one should have 
played the sound.

No I have heard nothing.
speakers level are set at max value
thanks
.g

--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org

--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org

Re: audio problems

[Samuel Sieb]

On 05/23/2016 03:13 PM, gil wrote:

$ aplay -D plughw:0,0 /usr/share/sounds/purple/alert.wav
Playing WAVE '/usr/share/sounds/purple/alert.wav' : Signed 16 bit Little
Endian, Rate 22050 Hz, Mono
$ aplay -D plughw:0,1 /usr/share/sounds/purple/alert.wav
Playing WAVE '/usr/share/sounds/purple/alert.wav' : Signed 16 bit Little
Endian, Rate 22050 Hz, Mono
$ aplay -D plughw:1,3 /usr/share/sounds/purple/alert.wav
Playing WAVE '/usr/share/sounds/purple/alert.wav' : Signed 16 bit Little
Endian, Rate 22050 Hz, Mono
$ aplay -D plughw:1,7 /usr/share/sounds/purple/alert.wav
Playing WAVE '/usr/share/sounds/purple/alert.wav' : Signed 16 bit Little
Endian, Rate 22050 Hz, Mono

Did you hear anything from any of these?  The first one should have 
played the sound.

--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org