Re: 2 sets of backups with Backups?
On 30/04/2024 16:54, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: On Tue, 2024-04-30 at 16:44 +0700, Frederic Muller wrote: Hi! I currently do weekly backups with Backups and Duplicity> I was thinking to add another batch job of daily backup, faster, for specific files and folders that are updated daily. Unfortunately Backups doesn't seem to give the options for 2 batches, or selecting single files. How would you do about that then? I have a NAS to which I plan to copy those files. I use Borgmatic, which runs nightly and has a config file for what I want to backup and how long to keep it. It's also deduplicating and optionally encrypts. poc Thank you very much. I was not aware of this application and will look into it. Fred -- ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: Who moved my journald.conf?
On Tue, May 7, 2024 at 2:20 PM Felix Miata wrote: > Tom Horsley composed on 2024-05-07 14:09 (UTC-0400): > > > I have a bunch of journal setting I normally change in > > /etc/systemd/journald.conf. > > > In fedora40 there doesn't appear to be such a file. > > > Where are journal settings configured these days? > > /etc/systemd/journald.conf.d/ for overrides & customizations. > ++, this. Then, when you perform a system-upgrade and run `rpmconf -a`, you will always get the maintainer's version of the file, and you will always override to suit your taste. Jeff -- ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: Who moved my journald.conf?
On Tue, 07 May 2024 23:22:53 +0100, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: > In that case I assume it was put there under F39. Seems very odd that > the upgrade just kept it in addition to the one in /usr/lib/systemd. Depends. You cannot rely on just "rpm -qf ..." since that only queries the package file list regardless of what the file contents are. And that includes %ghost files which possibly don't exist. Also, it is not only a %ghost file but also still marked as %config, and if it has been modified by you, RPM package upgrades would handle it like a config file. What is in your /etc/systemd/journald.conf file compared with the default in /usr/lib/systemd/journald.conf? -- ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: Who moved my journald.conf?
On Tue, 2024-05-07 at 23:29 +0200, Michael Schwendt wrote: > On Tue, 07 May 2024 21:38:47 +0100, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: > > > It's there on my system, updated from F39: > > > > # rpm -qf /etc/systemd/journald.conf > > systemd-255.4-1.fc40.x86_64 > > No, it's not: > > $ rpm -qcv systemd|grep conf$ > -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 0 Mar 1 01:00 > /etc/X11/xorg.conf.d/00-keyboard.conf > -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 21 Mar 1 01:00 > /etc/dnf/protected.d/systemd.conf > -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 0 Mar 1 01:00 > /etc/locale.conf > -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 0 Mar 1 01:00 > /etc/systemd/journald.conf > -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 0 Mar 1 01:00 > /etc/systemd/logind.conf > -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 0 Mar 1 01:00 > /etc/systemd/system.conf > -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 0 Mar 1 01:00 > /etc/systemd/user.conf > > It's a %ghost config file, which means it is marked as belonging to > the > package (even if it doesn't exist in the directory), so it can be > handled > appropriately on package removal/updates. > > The default file has been moved to /usr/lib/systemd/journald.conf. In that case I assume it was put there under F39. Seems very odd that the upgrade just kept it in addition to the one in /usr/lib/systemd. poc -- ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: Who moved my journald.conf?
Tom Horsley composed on 2024-05-07 14:34 (UTC-0400): > On Tue, 7 May 2024 14:19:46 -0400 Felix Miata wrote: >> /etc/systemd/journald.conf.d/ for overrides & customizations. > A directory which also doesn't exist :-). Like other /etc/**.conf.d/ directories in a systemd environment, it's optional, a place to override things one isn't happy with in the /usr/ tree. # cat /etc/systemd/journal.conf.d/local.conf [Journal] Storage=persistent SystemMaxFiles=10 RuntimeMaxFiles=12 ForwardToConsole=yes TTYPath=/dev/tty10 Audit=no # -- Evolution as taught in public schools is, like religion, based on faith, not based on science. Team OS/2 ** Reg. Linux User #211409 ** a11y rocks! Felix Miata -- ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: What is Castor ? Att.Jonathan Billings.
On May 4, 2024, at 12:28, Roger Heflin wrote: > > castor is someplace on your machine defined as the linux node's hostname. > > dhcp-client does deliver the defined hostname in the dhcp > requests/responses to the router when it asks for the IP address. > > What does 'hostname' report? and 'hostnamectl' report as the hostname? This is the correct answer. “Castor” is your systems host name. Some home router/gateways will remember the hostname a system used as part of their network, and when handing out the same IP to a new host, re-uses the saved hostname. I’ve never encountered one of these devices, but I’ve heard of windows systems and even phones can do this. Set your preferred hostname either in GNOME Settings (or whatever DE’s settings) or with hostnamectl. -- Jonathan Billings -- ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: Who moved my journald.conf?
On Tue, 07 May 2024 21:38:47 +0100, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: > It's there on my system, updated from F39: > > # rpm -qf /etc/systemd/journald.conf > systemd-255.4-1.fc40.x86_64 No, it's not: $ rpm -qcv systemd|grep conf$ -rw-r--r--1 root root0 Mar 1 01:00 /etc/X11/xorg.conf.d/00-keyboard.conf -rw-r--r--1 root root 21 Mar 1 01:00 /etc/dnf/protected.d/systemd.conf -rw-r--r--1 root root0 Mar 1 01:00 /etc/locale.conf -rw-r--r--1 root root0 Mar 1 01:00 /etc/systemd/journald.conf -rw-r--r--1 root root0 Mar 1 01:00 /etc/systemd/logind.conf -rw-r--r--1 root root0 Mar 1 01:00 /etc/systemd/system.conf -rw-r--r--1 root root0 Mar 1 01:00 /etc/systemd/user.conf It's a %ghost config file, which means it is marked as belonging to the package (even if it doesn't exist in the directory), so it can be handled appropriately on package removal/updates. The default file has been moved to /usr/lib/systemd/journald.conf. -- ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: Who moved my journald.conf?
On Tue, 2024-05-07 at 16:54 -0400, Tom Horsley wrote: > On Tue, 07 May 2024 21:38:47 +0100 > Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: > > > # rpm -qf /etc/systemd/journald.conf > > systemd-255.4-1.fc40.x86_64 > > > > Try running 'rpm -V systemd'. > > Everything seems normal, I think they just did some kind of voodoo > to the rpm so it owns the file if it exists, but it doesn't actually > install a file because all the defaults are built in. I guess I just > have to create it myself if I want to change defaults. > -- I'm 100% sure I've never touched this file, so it must have came as part of the package. poc -- ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: Who moved my journald.conf?
On Tue, 07 May 2024 21:38:47 +0100 Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: > # rpm -qf /etc/systemd/journald.conf > systemd-255.4-1.fc40.x86_64 > > Try running 'rpm -V systemd'. Everything seems normal, I think they just did some kind of voodoo to the rpm so it owns the file if it exists, but it doesn't actually install a file because all the defaults are built in. I guess I just have to create it myself if I want to change defaults. -- ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: Who moved my journald.conf?
On Tue, 2024-05-07 at 14:09 -0400, Tom Horsley wrote: > I have a bunch of journal setting I normally change in > /etc/systemd/journald.conf. > > In fedora40 there doesn't appear to be such a file. It's there on my system, updated from F39: # rpm -qf /etc/systemd/journald.conf systemd-255.4-1.fc40.x86_64 Try running 'rpm -V systemd'. poc -- ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: Who moved my journald.conf?
On Tue, 7 May 2024 14:19:46 -0400 Felix Miata wrote: > /etc/systemd/journald.conf.d/ for overrides & customizations. A directory which also doesn't exist :-). -- ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: Who moved my journald.conf?
Tom Horsley composed on 2024-05-07 14:09 (UTC-0400): > I have a bunch of journal setting I normally change in > /etc/systemd/journald.conf. > In fedora40 there doesn't appear to be such a file. > Where are journal settings configured these days? /etc/systemd/journald.conf.d/ for overrides & customizations. -- Evolution as taught in public schools is, like religion, based on faith, not based on science. Team OS/2 ** Reg. Linux User #211409 ** a11y rocks! Felix Miata -- ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: Who moved my journald.conf?
On Tue, 7 May 2024 14:09:57 -0400 Tom Horsley wrote: > I have a bunch of journal setting I normally change in > /etc/systemd/journald.conf. > > In fedora40 there doesn't appear to be such a file. It gets more confusing. If I do (in fedora 40) a rpm -q --list systemd /etc/systemd/journald.conf Appears in the list of files owned by systemd, but if I look in /etc/systemd on a fedora 40 image installed directly from the workstation dvd image, that file doesn't exist. Will it pay attention to the settings if I create it? -- ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Who moved my journald.conf?
I have a bunch of journal setting I normally change in /etc/systemd/journald.conf. In fedora40 there doesn't appear to be such a file. Where are journal settings configured these days? -- ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: Fedora 40 and nouveau
On 07/05/2024 14:07, Andre Robatino wrote: I have a very old computer with GeForce 6150SE nForce 430 integrated video. I had video trouble as well, had been using just "nomodeset" to work around it, but got 1024x768 pincushioned video on my old CRT with 1280x1024 as the maximum resolution. (This is just a backup machine now, that I normally just ssh into to do updates, so I could tolerate it.) The machine is dual boot with Windows 10 where I get normal 1280x1024 video. Probably Windows has a much bigger hardware database and is better able to work around quirky hardware. Anyway, with F40 it wouldn't boot to graphical at all, but I eventually found that adding "nomodeset vga=795" fixes the video and lets it come up in 1280x1024, without pincushioning, like in Windows. (I'm not able to change the video resolution as an ordinary user, in Settings, but I don't care since the resolution is optimal.) Both options are necessary. The video mode numbers are at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/VESA_BIOS_Extensions#Linux_video_mode_numbers . So try "nomodeset vga=XXX" where XXX is the desired mode. Thank you for that - and ISTR that you had posted something similar earlier. I have tried it, and variations on it, but any boot-to-completion still gives me 800x600. I just tried playback of 1920x1080, and it was fine, but ffmpeg used 4 cores all at 90%. Letting the TV do the heavy lifting is better. John -- ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: Fedora 40 and nouveau
I have a very old computer with GeForce 6150SE nForce 430 integrated video. I had video trouble as well, had been using just "nomodeset" to work around it, but got 1024x768 pincushioned video on my old CRT with 1280x1024 as the maximum resolution. (This is just a backup machine now, that I normally just ssh into to do updates, so I could tolerate it.) The machine is dual boot with Windows 10 where I get normal 1280x1024 video. Probably Windows has a much bigger hardware database and is better able to work around quirky hardware. Anyway, with F40 it wouldn't boot to graphical at all, but I eventually found that adding "nomodeset vga=795" fixes the video and lets it come up in 1280x1024, without pincushioning, like in Windows. (I'm not able to change the video resolution as an ordinary user, in Settings, but I don't care since the resolution is optimal.) Both options are necessary. The video mode numbers are at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/VESA_BIOS_Extensions#Linux_video_mode_numbers . So try "nomodeset vga=XXX" where XXX is the desired mode. -- ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: Fedora 40 and nouveau
On 07/05/2024 05:12, Felix Miata wrote: John Pilkington composed on 2024-05-06 12:32 (UTC+0100): Both my old HP boxes have F40 up-to-date. Both are connected to an HDMI tv and vga monitor, but the one dual-booted with Windows has a fixed 800x600 screen size that appears only on the HDMI screen but lacks HDMI audio. I reinstalled the (Fedora provided) nouveau driver on both boxes before these reboots. The boot lines shown give running systems. Most variants that I have tried freeze sooner or later. I still have no idea of how to pre-specify the devices that I want to use. It's not clear to me whether you're trying to solve a video problem, an audio problem, or both, or whether the answers apply to both hosts, or just one. Good luck with your audio. Getting Linux audio to me is inexplicable hocus pocus. Thank you for the various diagnostic quotes from your system. My main reason for posting was to provide info about settings that worked for me, because I find testing of systems that fail to boot frustrating. I have removed xorg-x11-drv-nouveau from the dual-boot box, and applied today's upgrades. It still seems to need "nomodeset" to boot to a working system, still 800x600 and only on the HDMI screen, with line-out audio. Specifying "modesetting" starts well, with both screens active in text mode; but then it jumps to graphical memory images, and shortly after the cursor appears it, and then the whole system, freezes. Continuing John -- ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue