Re: aeskulap and dicom files
On Jul 11, 2015 12:38 PM, Gregory P. Ennis po...@pomec.net wrote: [root@HmGe f21]# rpm -Uhvf aeskulap-0.2.2-0.19beta1.fc21.x86_64.rpm error: Failed dependencies: `rpm` knows about dependencies but does not pull other packages to resolve them. That's dnf's job. Use dnf, do not use rpm directly. ... John, Can you give me a list of what repositories you are using. Here is what I got Greg [root@HmGe f21]# dnf --nogpgcheck --releasever=21 install aeskulap -0.2.2-0.19beta1.fc21.x86_64.rpm Extra Packages for Enterprise Linux 7 - x86_64 1.2 MB/s | 9.3 MB 00:07 You are not running Enterprise Linux 7. This repo is not for Fedora. Using it will cause conflicts and unpredictable problems. --Pete -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: aeskulap and dicom files
You are not running Enterprise Linux 7. This repo is not for Fedora. Using it will cause conflicts and unpredictable problems. --Pete Thanks Pete finally figured that out too. Greg -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: aeskulap and dicom files
Date: Sun, 12 Jul 2015 06:43:50 -0500 On Sun, 2015-07-12 at 19:35 +0800, Ed Greshko wrote: On 07/12/15 19:23, Gregory P. Ennis wrote: Thank you for your reply. I had to remove f22 dcmtk before this would work, but at least I have my DICOM viewer back. Thanks again! You're welcome. You may want to add an exclude in your dnf.conf for the F21 packages so they get skipped the next time you do an update to your system. -- Sorta what I want to say when folks habitually complain about Fedora - https://youtu.be/ZArl8fTfub4 -- Everyone, I have been in dialog with the Fedora maintainer of aeskulap, Ankur Sinha, and he is working to get it ready for F22. He has filled a bug report for dcmtk. Ankur's response to one of my e-mails is as follows: No worries. I looked at the error, but it probably requires me to look into dcmtk changes to fix it. I've filed a bug here for the time being: https://github.com/pipelka/aeskulap/issues/2 This seems to be the original author of aeskulap, so I'm hopeful that we'll have a fix. Greg -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: aeskulap and dicom files
On 12/07/15 07:35, Ed Greshko wrote: You may want to add an exclude in your dnf.conf for the F21 packages so they get skipped the next time you do an update to your system. . Where does the exclude go, other than in the update commend perhaps, I didn't see a place in dnf.conf? Bob -- Bob Goodwin - Zuni, Virginia, USA http://www.qrz.com/db/W2BOD box10 FEDORA-22/64bit LINUX XFCE -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: aeskulap and dicom files
On 07/12/15 19:23, Gregory P. Ennis wrote: Thank you for your reply. I had to remove f22 dcmtk before this would work, but at least I have my DICOM viewer back. Thanks again! You're welcome. You may want to add an exclude in your dnf.conf for the F21 packages so they get skipped the next time you do an update to your system. -- Sorta what I want to say when folks habitually complain about Fedora - https://youtu.be/ZArl8fTfub4 -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: aeskulap and dicom files
On 07/12/15 01:38, Gregory P. Ennis wrote: Can you give me a list of what repositories you are using. Here is what I got I used dnf -- nogpgcheck --releasever=21 install aeskulap And it install just fine as well. It installed a total of 5 packages from F21. CharLS x86_64 1.0-8.fc21fedora66 k aeskulap x86_64 0.2.2-0.19beta1.fc21 fedora 1.1 M dcmtk x86_64 3.6.0-18.fc21 fedora 3.9 M gconfmm26 x86_64 2.28.3-8.fc21 fedora46 k libglademm24 x86_64 2.6.7-11.fc21 fedora42 k And I found that dcmtk supplied libdcmdata.so.3.6 -- Sorta what I want to say when folks habitually complain about Fedora - https://youtu.be/ZArl8fTfub4 -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: aeskulap and dicom files
On 07/12/15 00:48, John Austin wrote: This worked OK for me I don't even think I needed to download aeskulap separately 2015_07_10 Down loaded aeskulap-0.2.2-0.19beta1.fc21.x86_64.rpm from F21 mirror Installed on F22 as follows dnf --nogpgcheck --releasever=21 install aeskulap-0.2.2-0.19beta1.fc21.x86_64.rpm Yes, that would be the best way to go. I got my test VM back up and working and dnf --nogpgcheck --releasever=21 install aeskulap worked fine for me as well. -- Sorta what I want to say when folks habitually complain about Fedora - https://youtu.be/ZArl8fTfub4 -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: aeskulap and dicom files
On 07/12/15 21:39, Bob Goodwin - Zuni, Virginia, USA wrote: On 12/07/15 07:35, Ed Greshko wrote: You may want to add an exclude in your dnf.conf for the F21 packages so they get skipped the next time you do an update to your system. . Where does the exclude go, other than in the update commend perhaps, I didn't see a place in dnf.conf? man dnf.conf has all the gory details. Read the section Options for Both [Main] and Repo -- Sorta what I want to say when folks habitually complain about Fedora - https://youtu.be/ZArl8fTfub4 -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: aeskulap and dicom files
On 07/12/15 22:29, Bob Goodwin - Zuni, Virginia, USA wrote: gpgcheck=1 installonly_limit=3 clean_requirements_on_remove=true exclude=fc21 Do you think this would be sufficient, or perhaps it needs exclude=*fc21? Googling hasn't helped ... In this particular case I would make it exclude=CharLS,dcmtk,gconfmm26,libglademm24 Since those are the packages needed from F21 to get aeskulap from F21 to run. It is clear from other info that updating dcmtk will break it since it supplies a different version of a needed library. -- Sorta what I want to say when folks habitually complain about Fedora - https://youtu.be/ZArl8fTfub4 -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: aeskulap and dicom files
On Sun, 2015-07-12 at 16:20 +0800, Ed Greshko wrote: On 07/12/15 01:38, Gregory P. Ennis wrote: Can you give me a list of what repositories you are using. Here is what I got I used dnf -- nogpgcheck --releasever=21 install aeskulap And it install just fine as well. It installed a total of 5 packages from F21. CharLS x86_64 1.0-8.fc21fedora 66 k aeskulap x86_64 0.2.2-0.19beta1.fc21 fedora 1.1 M dcmtk x86_64 3.6.0-18.fc21 fedora 3.9 M gconfmm26 x86_64 2.28.3-8.fc21 fedora 46 k libglademm24 x86_64 2.6.7-11.fc21 fedora 42 k And I found that dcmtk supplied libdcmdata.so.3.6 -- Sorta what I want to say when folks habitually complain about Fedora - https://youtu.be/ZArl8fTfub4 Ed, Thank you for your reply. I had to remove f22 dcmtk before this would work, but at least I have my DICOM viewer back. Thanks again! I also received some communication from Ankur Sinha who is the maintainer, and it appears that putting aeskulap in f22 is on todo list. Thanks again to all of you to help me get this functionally on f22. Greg -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: aeskulap and dicom files
On Sun, 2015-07-12 at 19:35 +0800, Ed Greshko wrote: On 07/12/15 19:23, Gregory P. Ennis wrote: Thank you for your reply. I had to remove f22 dcmtk before this would work, but at least I have my DICOM viewer back. Thanks again! You're welcome. You may want to add an exclude in your dnf.conf for the F21 packages so they get skipped the next time you do an update to your system. -- Sorta what I want to say when folks habitually complain about Fedora - https://youtu.be/ZArl8fTfub4 Great thought thanks!!! Greg -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: aeskulap and dicom files
On 12/07/15 09:55, Ed Greshko wrote: Where does the exclude go, other than in the update commend perhaps, I didn't see a place in dnf.conf? man dnf.conf has all the gory details. Read the section Options for Both [Main] and Repo . [main] gpgcheck=1 installonly_limit=3 clean_requirements_on_remove=true exclude=fc21 Do you think this would be sufficient, or perhaps it needs exclude=*fc21? Googling hasn't helped ... -- Bob Goodwin - Zuni, Virginia, USA http://www.qrz.com/db/W2BOD box10 FEDORA-22/64bit LINUX XFCE -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: aeskulap and dicom files
On 12/07/15 10:36, Ed Greshko wrote: In this particular case I would make it exclude=CharLS,dcmtk,gconfmm26,libglademm24 Since those are the packages needed from F21 to get aeskulap from F21 to run. It is clear from other info that updating dcmtk will break it since it supplies a different version of a needed library. . Ok, did that. Will see how it goes. Thanks, Bob -- Bob Goodwin - Zuni, Virginia, USA http://www.qrz.com/db/W2BOD box10 FEDORA-22/64bit LINUX XFCE -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: aeskulap and dicom files
On Fri, 2015-07-10 at 10:16 +0800, Ed Greshko wrote: On 07/10/15 09:20, Gregory P. Ennis wrote: Looks like aeskulap was not included in F22. I had it on F21 and before. It was a very decent dicom viewer. Does anyone know why this was not included in F22. It was a good product. Looking at their website, http://aeskulap.nongnu.org/, it doesn't appear to be a very active or maintained application. The last release was in 2007. It is possible that with changes to system libraries other factors it became too hard to build and maintain? If you need it, why don't you try downloading the F21 rpm and installing it on your F22 system. -- Sorta what I want to say when folks habitually complain about Fedora - https://youtu.be/ZArl8fTfub4 Ed, Thanks for your response. That was a good idea, but I did not get very far : [root@HmGe f21]# rpm -Uhvf aeskulap-0.2.2-0.19beta1.fc21.x86_64.rpm error: Failed dependencies: libdcmdata.so.3.6()(64bit) is needed by aeskulap-0.2.2 -0.19beta1.fc21.x86_64 libdcmimage.so.3.6()(64bit) is needed by aeskulap-0.2.2 -0.19beta1.fc21.x86_64 libdcmimgle.so.3.6()(64bit) is needed by aeskulap-0.2.2 -0.19beta1.fc21.x86_64 libdcmjpeg.so.3.6()(64bit) is needed by aeskulap-0.2.2 -0.19beta1.fc21.x86_64 libdcmnet.so.3.6()(64bit) is needed by aeskulap-0.2.2 -0.19beta1.fc21.x86_64 libijg12.so.3.6()(64bit) is needed by aeskulap-0.2.2 -0.19beta1.fc21.x86_64 libijg16.so.3.6()(64bit) is needed by aeskulap-0.2.2 -0.19beta1.fc21.x86_64 libijg8.so.3.6()(64bit) is needed by aeskulap-0.2.2 -0.19beta1.fc21.x86_64 liboflog.so.3.6()(64bit) is needed by aeskulap-0.2.2 -0.19beta1.fc21.x86_64 libofstd.so.3.6()(64bit) is needed by aeskulap-0.2.2 -0.19beta1.fc21.x86_64 I have tried to contact the maintainer of f21 aeskulap, sanjay.an...@gmail.com, to see if I could persuade him to maintain the package for f22, but I he has not responded yet. This was really an excellent product even though the developer has not added to it since 2007. If anyone else has ideas I would appreciate suggestions. Greg -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: aeskulap and dicom files
On Sat, 2015-07-11 at 17:48 +0100, John Austin wrote: On Sat, 2015-07-11 at 11:00 -0500, Gregory P. Ennis wrote: On Fri, 2015-07-10 at 10:16 +0800, Ed Greshko wrote: On 07/10/15 09:20, Gregory P. Ennis wrote: Looks like aeskulap was not included in F22. I had it on F21 and before. It was a very decent dicom viewer. Does anyone know why this was not included in F22. It was a good product. Looking at their website, http://aeskulap.nongnu.org/, it doesn't appear to be a very active or maintained application. The last release was in 2007. It is possible that with changes to system libraries other factors it became too hard to build and maintain? If you need it, why don't you try downloading the F21 rpm and installing it on your F22 system. -- Sorta what I want to say when folks habitually complain about Fedora - https://youtu.be/ZArl8fTfub4 Ed, Thanks for your response. That was a good idea, but I did not get very far : [root@HmGe f21]# rpm -Uhvf aeskulap-0.2.2-0.19beta1.fc21.x86_64.rpm error: Failed dependencies: libdcmdata.so.3.6()(64bit) is needed by aeskulap-0.2.2 -0.19beta1.fc21.x86_64 libdcmimage.so.3.6()(64bit) is needed by aeskulap-0.2.2 -0.19beta1.fc21.x86_64 libdcmimgle.so.3.6()(64bit) is needed by aeskulap-0.2.2 -0.19beta1.fc21.x86_64 libdcmjpeg.so.3.6()(64bit) is needed by aeskulap-0.2.2 -0.19beta1.fc21.x86_64 libdcmnet.so.3.6()(64bit) is needed by aeskulap-0.2.2 -0.19beta1.fc21.x86_64 libijg12.so.3.6()(64bit) is needed by aeskulap-0.2.2 -0.19beta1.fc21.x86_64 libijg16.so.3.6()(64bit) is needed by aeskulap-0.2.2 -0.19beta1.fc21.x86_64 libijg8.so.3.6()(64bit) is needed by aeskulap-0.2.2 -0.19beta1.fc21.x86_64 liboflog.so.3.6()(64bit) is needed by aeskulap-0.2.2 -0.19beta1.fc21.x86_64 libofstd.so.3.6()(64bit) is needed by aeskulap-0.2.2 -0.19beta1.fc21.x86_64 I have tried to contact the maintainer of f21 aeskulap, sanjay.an...@gmail.com, to see if I could persuade him to maintain the package for f22, but I he has not responded yet. This was really an excellent product even though the developer has not added to it since 2007. If anyone else has ideas I would appreciate suggestions. Greg Hi This worked OK for me I don't even think I needed to download aeskulap separately 2015_07_10 Down loaded aeskulap-0.2.2-0.19beta1.fc21.x86_64.rpm from F21 mirror Installed on F22 as follows dnf --nogpgcheck --releasever=21 install aeskulap-0.2.2 -0.19beta1.fc21.x86_64.rpm Hope it helps John = === = === = Package Arch Version Repository Size = === = === = Installing: CharLS x86_64 1.0-8.fc21 fedora 66 k aeskulapx86_64 0.2.2-0.19beta1.fc21 @commandline 1.1 M dcmtk x86_64 3.6.0-18.fc21 fedora 3.9 M gconfmm26 x86_64 2.28.3-8.fc21 fedora 46 k libglademm24x86_64 2.6.7-11.fc21 fedora 42 k Transaction Summary = === = === = Install 5 Packages John, Can you give me a list of what repositories you are using. Here is what I got Greg [root@HmGe f21]#
Re: aeskulap and dicom files
On Sat, 2015-07-11 at 11:00 -0500, Gregory P. Ennis wrote: On Fri, 2015-07-10 at 10:16 +0800, Ed Greshko wrote: On 07/10/15 09:20, Gregory P. Ennis wrote: Looks like aeskulap was not included in F22. I had it on F21 and before. It was a very decent dicom viewer. Does anyone know why this was not included in F22. It was a good product. Looking at their website, http://aeskulap.nongnu.org/, it doesn't appear to be a very active or maintained application. The last release was in 2007. It is possible that with changes to system libraries other factors it became too hard to build and maintain? If you need it, why don't you try downloading the F21 rpm and installing it on your F22 system. -- Sorta what I want to say when folks habitually complain about Fedora - https://youtu.be/ZArl8fTfub4 Ed, Thanks for your response. That was a good idea, but I did not get very far : [root@HmGe f21]# rpm -Uhvf aeskulap-0.2.2-0.19beta1.fc21.x86_64.rpm error: Failed dependencies: libdcmdata.so.3.6()(64bit) is needed by aeskulap-0.2.2 -0.19beta1.fc21.x86_64 libdcmimage.so.3.6()(64bit) is needed by aeskulap-0.2.2 -0.19beta1.fc21.x86_64 libdcmimgle.so.3.6()(64bit) is needed by aeskulap-0.2.2 -0.19beta1.fc21.x86_64 libdcmjpeg.so.3.6()(64bit) is needed by aeskulap-0.2.2 -0.19beta1.fc21.x86_64 libdcmnet.so.3.6()(64bit) is needed by aeskulap-0.2.2 -0.19beta1.fc21.x86_64 libijg12.so.3.6()(64bit) is needed by aeskulap-0.2.2 -0.19beta1.fc21.x86_64 libijg16.so.3.6()(64bit) is needed by aeskulap-0.2.2 -0.19beta1.fc21.x86_64 libijg8.so.3.6()(64bit) is needed by aeskulap-0.2.2 -0.19beta1.fc21.x86_64 liboflog.so.3.6()(64bit) is needed by aeskulap-0.2.2 -0.19beta1.fc21.x86_64 libofstd.so.3.6()(64bit) is needed by aeskulap-0.2.2 -0.19beta1.fc21.x86_64 I have tried to contact the maintainer of f21 aeskulap, sanjay.an...@gmail.com, to see if I could persuade him to maintain the package for f22, but I he has not responded yet. This was really an excellent product even though the developer has not added to it since 2007. If anyone else has ideas I would appreciate suggestions. Greg Hi This worked OK for me I don't even think I needed to download aeskulap separately 2015_07_10 Down loaded aeskulap-0.2.2-0.19beta1.fc21.x86_64.rpm from F21 mirror Installed on F22 as follows dnf --nogpgcheck --releasever=21 install aeskulap-0.2.2-0.19beta1.fc21.x86_64.rpm Hope it helps John = Package Arch Version Repository Size = Installing: CharLS x86_64 1.0-8.fc21 fedora 66 k aeskulapx86_64 0.2.2-0.19beta1.fc21@commandline 1.1 M dcmtk x86_64 3.6.0-18.fc21 fedora 3.9 M gconfmm26 x86_64 2.28.3-8.fc21 fedora 46 k libglademm24x86_64 2.6.7-11.fc21 fedora 42 k Transaction Summary = Install 5 Packages -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away:
Re: aeskulap and dicom files
On 11.07.2015, John Austin wrote: dnf --nogpgcheck --releasever=21 install aeskulap-0.2.2-0.19beta1.fc21.x86_64.rpm On my F22 machine, this ends up with: Error: package aeskulap-0.2.2-0.20beta1.fc21.x86_64 requires libdcmdata.so.3.6()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed Btw: there is also ginkgo-cadx. It's not as good as aeskulap, and doesn't compile on Fedora (but does on Arch). Here's the error: /usr/local/src/srcpkg/ginkgocadx-3.6.1.1367.34/src/cadxcore/api/initwx.cpp:67:42: fatal error: vtkThreadedStreamingPipeline.h: No such file or directory This is because vtkThreadedStreamingPipeline.h was removed from vtk. So if anybody wants to spend some time on it... (not me). -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: aeskulap and dicom files
On Sat, 11 Jul 2015 11:00:52 -0500 Gregory P. Ennis po...@pomec.net wrote: Looking at their website, http://aeskulap.nongnu.org/, it doesn't appear to be a very active or maintained application. The last release was in 2007. It is possible that with changes to system libraries other factors it became too hard to build and maintain? Just tried to rebuild aeskulap on F22. Too many errors. What about http://amide.sourceforge.net/ ? Rebuild was done without any problems. Dependencies are in Fedora repository. I can see demo images (error on the initial window). Unfortunately i can't find the CD with my own images to look at it. If you have problems to rebuild the package, i can send you .rpm and .srpm. BR, Bob -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
aeskulap and dicom files
Everyone, Looks like aeskulap was not included in F22. I had it on F21 and before. It was a very decent dicom viewer. Does anyone know why this was not included in F22. It was a good product. Greg Ennis -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: aeskulap and dicom files
On 07/10/15 09:20, Gregory P. Ennis wrote: Looks like aeskulap was not included in F22. I had it on F21 and before. It was a very decent dicom viewer. Does anyone know why this was not included in F22. It was a good product. Looking at their website, http://aeskulap.nongnu.org/, it doesn't appear to be a very active or maintained application. The last release was in 2007. It is possible that with changes to system libraries other factors it became too hard to build and maintain? If you need it, why don't you try downloading the F21 rpm and installing it on your F22 system. -- Sorta what I want to say when folks habitually complain about Fedora - https://youtu.be/ZArl8fTfub4 -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
