[ANN] Complete JCL to Slf4j migration
Hi, Some time ago I asked how to globally suppress inclusion of a dependency. This was necessary to exclude commons-logging from my application. The question was unanswered. I still did not find a solution so I wrote my own version of a commons-logging release to fool Maven and get rid of JCL. You can read about the why and how on my blog: http://day-to-day-stuff.blogspot.com/2007/07/no-more-commons-logging.html Regards, Erik. -- Erik van Oosten http://2008.rubyenrails.nl/ http://www.day-to-day-stuff.blogspot.com/ -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/-ANN--Complete-JCL-to-Slf4j-migration-tf4109124s177.html#a11685072 Sent from the Maven - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: [ANN] Complete JCL to Slf4j migration
Hi Erik, Erik van Oosten wrote on Thursday, July 19, 2007 11:16 AM: Hi, Some time ago I asked how to globally suppress inclusion of a dependency. This was necessary to exclude commons-logging from my application. The question was unanswered. I still did not find a solution so I wrote my own version of a commons-logging release to fool Maven and get rid of JCL. You can read about the why and how on my blog: http://day-to-day-stuff.blogspot.com/2007/07/no-more-commons-l ogging.html in any case it would be better to use a version like 99.0-does-not-exist to mark it explicitly. I bet people will not like having to answering questions about JCL 9.0 on the JC-lists. It does not help, if you make a note in your blog and an artifact referencing this dep is later published to Maven central. - Jörg - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: [ANN] Complete JCL to Slf4j migration
Good idea, I'll change it immediately. Regards, Erik. Jörg Schaible wrote: Hi Erik, Erik van Oosten wrote on Thursday, July 19, 2007 11:16 AM: Hi, Some time ago I asked how to globally suppress inclusion of a dependency. This was necessary to exclude commons-logging from my application. The question was unanswered. I still did not find a solution so I wrote my own version of a commons-logging release to fool Maven and get rid of JCL. You can read about the why and how on my blog: http://day-to-day-stuff.blogspot.com/2007/07/no-more-commons-l ogging.html in any case it would be better to use a version like 99.0-does-not-exist to mark it explicitly. I bet people will not like having to answering questions about JCL 9.0 on the JC-lists. It does not help, if you make a note in your blog and an artifact referencing this dep is later published to Maven central. - Jörg - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/-ANN--Complete-JCL-to-Slf4j-migration-tf4109124s177.html#a11685434 Sent from the Maven - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
