Re: Maven Docker Images
t; > > > > > > > > > > > > nowadays.> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > With docker being mainstream I agree that we can reconsider > > > > > > > > this.> > > > > > > > > > > > > > The docker image build/distribution could perhaps be part > of > > our > > > > > > > > > > > > > > release> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > process.> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > WDYT Carlos ?> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Thu, Oct 19, 2017 at 4:16 AM, Mike Drob < > md...@apache.org > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > wrote:> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I guess the natural follow-on question is whether the > Maven > > > > > > > > > > > > > > community> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > would consider publishing an official set of images? Or > > > > > > > > > > > > > > alternatively> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > whether they should send a takedown notice to protect > their > > > > > > > > brand > > > > > > > > > > > and> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > trademarks...> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 2017-10-18 18:36, "Manfred Moser" < > > ma...@simpligility.com> > > > > > > > > > > > > wrote:> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > No. As you can see from the github URL this is NOT an > > apache > > > > > > > > > > > > URL.> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > https://github.com/carlossg/docker-maven> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Mike Drob wrote on 2017-10-18 16:32:> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hello,> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Are the images at https://hub.docker.com/r/_/maven/ > > > > > > > > > > > > considered to > > > > > > > > > > > > > be> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > official> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > maven docker images and blessed/published by the > PMC?> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks,> > > > > > > > > > > > > Mike> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@maven. > > apache.org > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > For additional commands, e-mail: > > > > users-h...@maven.apache.org> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@maven. > > apache.org> > > > > > > > > > > > For additional commands, e-mail: > > users-h...@maven.apache.org > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: > users-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org > > > > > > > > > > > > > For additional commands, e-mail: > > users-h...@maven.apache.org> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --> > > > > > > > > > -> > > > > > > > > > Arnaud H�ritier> > > > > > > > > > http://aheritier.net> > > > > > > > > > Mail/GTalk: aheritier AT gmail DOT com> > > > > > > > > > Twitter/Skype : aheritier> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > - > > > > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org > > > > > > For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@maven.apache.org > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > WBR > > > > > Maxim aka solomax > > > > > > > > - > > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org > > > > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org > > > > > > > > - > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org > > For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@maven.apache.org > > > > > > > -- > WBR > Maxim aka solomax >
Re: Maven Docker Images
I would start with filing INFRA ticket :) On Fri, Oct 20, 2017 at 12:40 PM, Hervé BOUTEMY wrote: > awesome: there is some common practice we should get into > > do you know if there some docs somewhere? > I suppose there are some credentials associated to publishing to Dockerhub > > Regards, > > Hervé > > Le vendredi 20 octobre 2017, 11:39:22 CEST Maxim Solodovnik a écrit : > > In this case dockerhub is preferable :) > > > > On Fri, Oct 20, 2017 at 11:07 AM, Bindul Bhowmik < > bindulbhow...@gmail.com> > > > > wrote: > > > Maxim, > > > > > > On Thu, Oct 19, 2017 at 7:54 PM, Maxim Solodovnik < > solomax...@gmail.com> > > > > > > wrote: > > > > Hello, > > > > > > > > here is the place for Apache docker images managed by infra and > Apache > > > > projects https://bintray.com/apache/ :) > > > > > > From what I have seen, while there are 4 projects with docker > > > repositories on bintray, there seem to be a lot more at dockerhub [1]. > > > I did a quick search on INFRA JIRA and found that infra has set a few > > > projects up on dockerhub recently [2], for example INFRA-14756 [3] for > > > bookkeeper. > > > > > > Bindul > > > > > > [1] https://hub.docker.com/r/apache/ > > > [2] https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=component%20% > > > 3D%20Docker%20AND%20project%20%3D%20INFRA > > > [3] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-14756 > > > > > > > On Fri, Oct 20, 2017 at 12:30 AM, Hervé BOUTEMY < > herve.bout...@free.fr> > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > great idea > > > > > > > > > > ok, we need a git repo at ASF > > > > > > > > > > what else? > > > > > Is there some sort of release process? some sort of source to > release? > > > > > > > > > > Regards, > > > > > > > > > > Hervé > > > > > > > > > > Le jeudi 19 octobre 2017, 13:47:45 CEST Mike Drob a écrit : > > > > > > Thanks for the pointer, Carlos! I had searched the archives, but > > > > > > maybe I > > > > > > > > > didn't go back far enough. > > > > > > > > > > > > I think moving these Dockerfiles into an ASF repo would be great > for > > > > > > > > > > their > > > > > > > > > > > maintainability. > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > > > > > > > > > Mike > > > > > > > > > > > > On 2017-10-19 03:50, Carlos Sanchez wrote: > > > > > > > Arnaud is correct, I sent an email to users@ back on Fri, Nov > 7, > > > > > > > > > > 2014,> > > > > > > > > > > > > 00:23 when I created the image> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Thu, Oct 19, 2017, 11:12 Arnaud H�ritier > > > > > > wrote:> > > > > > > > > > > > These images are kindly managed by a PMC member of our > project > > > > > > > > > > (Carlos) > > > > > > > > > > > but> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > yes they aren't managed directly by the project> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > We can easily see with him to improve this IMO.> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > When he started that (several years ago) Docker wasn't what > it > > > > > > > > is > > > > > > > > > > > > nowadays.> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > With docker being mainstream I agree that we can reconsider > > > > > > this.> > > > > > > > > > > > The docker image build/distribution could perhaps be part of > our > > > > > > > > > > > > release> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > process.> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > WDYT Carlos ?> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Thu, Oct 19, 2017 at 4:16 AM, Mike Dr
Re: Maven Docker Images
awesome: there is some common practice we should get into do you know if there some docs somewhere? I suppose there are some credentials associated to publishing to Dockerhub Regards, Hervé Le vendredi 20 octobre 2017, 11:39:22 CEST Maxim Solodovnik a écrit : > In this case dockerhub is preferable :) > > On Fri, Oct 20, 2017 at 11:07 AM, Bindul Bhowmik > > wrote: > > Maxim, > > > > On Thu, Oct 19, 2017 at 7:54 PM, Maxim Solodovnik > > > > wrote: > > > Hello, > > > > > > here is the place for Apache docker images managed by infra and Apache > > > projects https://bintray.com/apache/ :) > > > > From what I have seen, while there are 4 projects with docker > > repositories on bintray, there seem to be a lot more at dockerhub [1]. > > I did a quick search on INFRA JIRA and found that infra has set a few > > projects up on dockerhub recently [2], for example INFRA-14756 [3] for > > bookkeeper. > > > > Bindul > > > > [1] https://hub.docker.com/r/apache/ > > [2] https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=component%20% > > 3D%20Docker%20AND%20project%20%3D%20INFRA > > [3] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-14756 > > > > > On Fri, Oct 20, 2017 at 12:30 AM, Hervé BOUTEMY > > > > > > wrote: > > > > great idea > > > > > > > > ok, we need a git repo at ASF > > > > > > > > what else? > > > > Is there some sort of release process? some sort of source to release? > > > > > > > > Regards, > > > > > > > > Hervé > > > > > > > > Le jeudi 19 octobre 2017, 13:47:45 CEST Mike Drob a écrit : > > > > > Thanks for the pointer, Carlos! I had searched the archives, but > > > > maybe I > > > > > > > didn't go back far enough. > > > > > > > > > > I think moving these Dockerfiles into an ASF repo would be great for > > > > > > > > their > > > > > > > > > maintainability. > > > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > > > > > > > Mike > > > > > > > > > > On 2017-10-19 03:50, Carlos Sanchez wrote: > > > > > > Arnaud is correct, I sent an email to users@ back on Fri, Nov 7, > > > > > > > > 2014,> > > > > > > > > > > 00:23 when I created the image> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Thu, Oct 19, 2017, 11:12 Arnaud H�ritier > > > > wrote:> > > > > > > > > > These images are kindly managed by a PMC member of our project > > > > > > > > (Carlos) > > > > > > > > > but> > > > > > > > > > > > > yes they aren't managed directly by the project> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > We can easily see with him to improve this IMO.> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > When he started that (several years ago) Docker wasn't what it > > > > > > > is > > > > > > > > > > nowadays.> > > > > > > > > > > > > With docker being mainstream I agree that we can reconsider > > > > this.> > > > > > > > > > The docker image build/distribution could perhaps be part of our > > > > > > > > > > release> > > > > > > > > > > > > process.> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > WDYT Carlos ?> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Thu, Oct 19, 2017 at 4:16 AM, Mike Drob > > > > > > > > wrote:> > > > > > > > > > > > > I guess the natural follow-on question is whether the Maven > > > > > > > > > > community> > > > > > > > > > > > > > would consider publishing an official set of images? Or > > > > > > > > > > alternatively> > > > > > > > > > > > > > whether they should send a takedown notice to protect their > > > > brand > > > > > > > and> > > > > > > > > > > > > > trademarks...> > > > > > > > > > > > > &g
Re: Maven Docker Images
In this case dockerhub is preferable :) On Fri, Oct 20, 2017 at 11:07 AM, Bindul Bhowmik wrote: > Maxim, > > On Thu, Oct 19, 2017 at 7:54 PM, Maxim Solodovnik > wrote: > > > > Hello, > > > > here is the place for Apache docker images managed by infra and Apache > > projects https://bintray.com/apache/ :) > > From what I have seen, while there are 4 projects with docker > repositories on bintray, there seem to be a lot more at dockerhub [1]. > I did a quick search on INFRA JIRA and found that infra has set a few > projects up on dockerhub recently [2], for example INFRA-14756 [3] for > bookkeeper. > > Bindul > > [1] https://hub.docker.com/r/apache/ > [2] https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=component%20% > 3D%20Docker%20AND%20project%20%3D%20INFRA > [3] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-14756 > > > > > On Fri, Oct 20, 2017 at 12:30 AM, Hervé BOUTEMY > > wrote: > > > > > great idea > > > > > > ok, we need a git repo at ASF > > > > > > what else? > > > Is there some sort of release process? some sort of source to release? > > > > > > Regards, > > > > > > Hervé > > > > > > Le jeudi 19 octobre 2017, 13:47:45 CEST Mike Drob a écrit : > > > > Thanks for the pointer, Carlos! I had searched the archives, but > maybe I > > > > didn't go back far enough. > > > > > > > > I think moving these Dockerfiles into an ASF repo would be great for > > > their > > > > maintainability. > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > > > > > Mike > > > > > > > > On 2017-10-19 03:50, Carlos Sanchez wrote: > > > > > Arnaud is correct, I sent an email to users@ back on Fri, Nov 7, > > > 2014,> > > > > > 00:23 when I created the image> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Thu, Oct 19, 2017, 11:12 Arnaud H�ritier > wrote:> > > > > > > > > > > > These images are kindly managed by a PMC member of our project > > > (Carlos) > > > > > > > > but> > > > > > > > > > > yes they aren't managed directly by the project> > > > > > > > > > > > > We can easily see with him to improve this IMO.> > > > > > > > > > > > > When he started that (several years ago) Docker wasn't what it is > > > > > > > > nowadays.> > > > > > > > > > > With docker being mainstream I agree that we can reconsider > this.> > > > > > > > > > > > > The docker image build/distribution could perhaps be part of our > > > > > > > > release> > > > > > > > > > > process.> > > > > > > > > > > > > WDYT Carlos ?> > > > > > > > > > > > > On Thu, Oct 19, 2017 at 4:16 AM, Mike Drob > > > wrote:> > > > > > > > > > > > > > I guess the natural follow-on question is whether the Maven > > > > > > > > community> > > > > > > > > > > > would consider publishing an official set of images? Or > > > > > > > > alternatively> > > > > > > > > > > > whether they should send a takedown notice to protect their > brand > > > > > > > > and> > > > > > > > > > > > trademarks...> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 2017-10-18 18:36, "Manfred Moser" > > > wrote:> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > No. As you can see from the github URL this is NOT an apache > > > URL.> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > https://github.com/carlossg/docker-maven> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Mike Drob wrote on 2017-10-18 16:32:> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hello,> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Are the images at https://hub.docker.com/r/_/maven/ > > > considered to > > > > > > > > be> > > > > > > > > > > > official> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
Re: Maven Docker Images
Hello, here is the place for Apache docker images managed by infra and Apache projects https://bintray.com/apache/ :) On Fri, Oct 20, 2017 at 12:30 AM, Hervé BOUTEMY wrote: > great idea > > ok, we need a git repo at ASF > > what else? > Is there some sort of release process? some sort of source to release? > > Regards, > > Hervé > > Le jeudi 19 octobre 2017, 13:47:45 CEST Mike Drob a écrit : > > Thanks for the pointer, Carlos! I had searched the archives, but maybe I > > didn't go back far enough. > > > > I think moving these Dockerfiles into an ASF repo would be great for > their > > maintainability. > > > > Thanks, > > > > Mike > > > > On 2017-10-19 03:50, Carlos Sanchez wrote: > > > Arnaud is correct, I sent an email to users@ back on Fri, Nov 7, > 2014,> > > > 00:23 when I created the image> > > > > > > > > > On Thu, Oct 19, 2017, 11:12 Arnaud H�ritier wrote:> > > > > > > > These images are kindly managed by a PMC member of our project > (Carlos) > > > > but> > > > > > > yes they aren't managed directly by the project> > > > > > > > > We can easily see with him to improve this IMO.> > > > > > > > > When he started that (several years ago) Docker wasn't what it is > > > > nowadays.> > > > > > > With docker being mainstream I agree that we can reconsider this.> > > > > > > > > The docker image build/distribution could perhaps be part of our > > > > release> > > > > > > process.> > > > > > > > > WDYT Carlos ?> > > > > > > > > On Thu, Oct 19, 2017 at 4:16 AM, Mike Drob > wrote:> > > > > > > > > > I guess the natural follow-on question is whether the Maven > > > > community> > > > > > > > would consider publishing an official set of images? Or > > > > alternatively> > > > > > > > whether they should send a takedown notice to protect their brand > > > > and> > > > > > > > trademarks...> > > > > > > > > > > On 2017-10-18 18:36, "Manfred Moser" > wrote:> > > > > > > > > > > > No. As you can see from the github URL this is NOT an apache > URL.> > > > > > > > > > > > > https://github.com/carlossg/docker-maven> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Mike Drob wrote on 2017-10-18 16:32:> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hello,> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Are the images at https://hub.docker.com/r/_/maven/ > considered to > > > > be> > > > > > > > official> > > > > > > > > > > > > maven docker images and blessed/published by the PMC?> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks,> > > > > > > > Mike> > > > > -> > > > > > > > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org> > > > > > > > For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@maven.apache.org> > > > > -> > > > > > > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org> > > > > > > For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@maven.apache.org> > > > > -> > > > > > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org> > > > > > For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@maven.apache.org> > > > > > > > > --> > > > > -> > > > > Arnaud H�ritier> > > > > http://aheritier.net> > > > > Mail/GTalk: aheritier AT gmail DOT com> > > > > Twitter/Skype : aheritier> > > > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@maven.apache.org > > -- WBR Maxim aka solomax
Re: Maven Docker Images
great idea ok, we need a git repo at ASF what else? Is there some sort of release process? some sort of source to release? Regards, Hervé Le jeudi 19 octobre 2017, 13:47:45 CEST Mike Drob a écrit : > Thanks for the pointer, Carlos! I had searched the archives, but maybe I > didn't go back far enough. > > I think moving these Dockerfiles into an ASF repo would be great for their > maintainability. > > Thanks, > > Mike > > On 2017-10-19 03:50, Carlos Sanchez wrote: > > Arnaud is correct, I sent an email to users@ back on Fri, Nov 7, 2014,> > > 00:23 when I created the image> > > > > > > On Thu, Oct 19, 2017, 11:12 Arnaud H�ritier wrote:> > > > > > These images are kindly managed by a PMC member of our project (Carlos) > > but> > > > > yes they aren't managed directly by the project> > > > > > > We can easily see with him to improve this IMO.> > > > > > > When he started that (several years ago) Docker wasn't what it is > > nowadays.> > > > > With docker being mainstream I agree that we can reconsider this.> > > > > > > The docker image build/distribution could perhaps be part of our > > release> > > > > process.> > > > > > > WDYT Carlos ?> > > > > > > On Thu, Oct 19, 2017 at 4:16 AM, Mike Drob wrote:> > > > > > > > I guess the natural follow-on question is whether the Maven > > community> > > > > > would consider publishing an official set of images? Or > > alternatively> > > > > > whether they should send a takedown notice to protect their brand > > and> > > > > > trademarks...> > > > > > > > > On 2017-10-18 18:36, "Manfred Moser" wrote:> > > > > > > > > > No. As you can see from the github URL this is NOT an apache URL.> > > > > > > > > > > https://github.com/carlossg/docker-maven> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Mike Drob wrote on 2017-10-18 16:32:> > > > > > > > > > > > Hello,> > > > > > > > > > > > > Are the images at https://hub.docker.com/r/_/maven/ considered to > > be> > > > > > official> > > > > > > > > > > maven docker images and blessed/published by the PMC?> > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks,> > > > > > > Mike> > > -> > > > > > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org> > > > > > > For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@maven.apache.org> > > -> > > > > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org> > > > > > For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@maven.apache.org> > > -> > > > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org> > > > > For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@maven.apache.org> > > > > > > --> > > > -> > > > Arnaud H�ritier> > > > http://aheritier.net> > > > Mail/GTalk: aheritier AT gmail DOT com> > > > Twitter/Skype : aheritier> - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@maven.apache.org
Re: Maven Docker Images
Thanks for the pointer, Carlos! I had searched the archives, but maybe I didn't go back far enough. I think moving these Dockerfiles into an ASF repo would be great for their maintainability. Thanks, Mike On 2017-10-19 03:50, Carlos Sanchez wrote: > Arnaud is correct, I sent an email to users@ back on Fri, Nov 7, 2014,> > 00:23 when I created the image> > > > On Thu, Oct 19, 2017, 11:12 Arnaud H�ritier wrote:> > > > These images are kindly managed by a PMC member of our project (Carlos) but> > > yes they aren't managed directly by the project> > >> > > We can easily see with him to improve this IMO.> > >> > > When he started that (several years ago) Docker wasn't what it is nowadays.> > > With docker being mainstream I agree that we can reconsider this.> > >> > > The docker image build/distribution could perhaps be part of our release> > > process.> > >> > > WDYT Carlos ?> > >> > > On Thu, Oct 19, 2017 at 4:16 AM, Mike Drob wrote:> > >> > > > I guess the natural follow-on question is whether the Maven community> > > > would consider publishing an official set of images? Or alternatively> > > > whether they should send a takedown notice to protect their brand and> > > > trademarks...> > > >> > > > On 2017-10-18 18:36, "Manfred Moser" wrote:> > > > > No. As you can see from the github URL this is NOT an apache URL.> > > > >> > > > > https://github.com/carlossg/docker-maven> > > > >> > > > >> > > > > Mike Drob wrote on 2017-10-18 16:32:> > > > >> > > > > > Hello,> > > > > >> > > > > > Are the images at https://hub.docker.com/r/_/maven/ considered to be> > > > official> > > > > > maven docker images and blessed/published by the PMC?> > > > > >> > > > > > Thanks,> > > > > > Mike> > > > > >> > > > > > -> > > > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org> > > > > > For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@maven.apache.org> > > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > > -> > > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org> > > > > For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@maven.apache.org> > > > >> > > > >> > > >> > > > -> > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org> > > > For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@maven.apache.org> > > >> > > >> > >> > >> > > --> > > -> > > Arnaud H�ritier> > > http://aheritier.net> > > Mail/GTalk: aheritier AT gmail DOT com> > > Twitter/Skype : aheritier> > >> >
Re: Maven Docker Images
Arnaud is correct, I sent an email to users@ back on Fri, Nov 7, 2014, 00:23 when I created the image On Thu, Oct 19, 2017, 11:12 Arnaud Héritier wrote: > These images are kindly managed by a PMC member of our project (Carlos) but > yes they aren't managed directly by the project > > We can easily see with him to improve this IMO. > > When he started that (several years ago) Docker wasn't what it is nowadays. > With docker being mainstream I agree that we can reconsider this. > > The docker image build/distribution could perhaps be part of our release > process. > > WDYT Carlos ? > > On Thu, Oct 19, 2017 at 4:16 AM, Mike Drob wrote: > > > I guess the natural follow-on question is whether the Maven community > > would consider publishing an official set of images? Or alternatively > > whether they should send a takedown notice to protect their brand and > > trademarks... > > > > On 2017-10-18 18:36, "Manfred Moser" wrote: > > > No. As you can see from the github URL this is NOT an apache URL. > > > > > > https://github.com/carlossg/docker-maven > > > > > > > > > Mike Drob wrote on 2017-10-18 16:32: > > > > > > > Hello, > > > > > > > > Are the images at https://hub.docker.com/r/_/maven/ considered to be > > official > > > > maven docker images and blessed/published by the PMC? > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > Mike > > > > > > > > - > > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org > > > > For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@maven.apache.org > > > > > > > > > > > > > - > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org > > > For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@maven.apache.org > > > > > > > > > > - > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org > > For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@maven.apache.org > > > > > > > -- > - > Arnaud Héritier > http://aheritier.net > Mail/GTalk: aheritier AT gmail DOT com > Twitter/Skype : aheritier >
Re: Maven Docker Images
These images are kindly managed by a PMC member of our project (Carlos) but yes they aren't managed directly by the project We can easily see with him to improve this IMO. When he started that (several years ago) Docker wasn't what it is nowadays. With docker being mainstream I agree that we can reconsider this. The docker image build/distribution could perhaps be part of our release process. WDYT Carlos ? On Thu, Oct 19, 2017 at 4:16 AM, Mike Drob wrote: > I guess the natural follow-on question is whether the Maven community > would consider publishing an official set of images? Or alternatively > whether they should send a takedown notice to protect their brand and > trademarks... > > On 2017-10-18 18:36, "Manfred Moser" wrote: > > No. As you can see from the github URL this is NOT an apache URL. > > > > https://github.com/carlossg/docker-maven > > > > > > Mike Drob wrote on 2017-10-18 16:32: > > > > > Hello, > > > > > > Are the images at https://hub.docker.com/r/_/maven/ considered to be > official > > > maven docker images and blessed/published by the PMC? > > > > > > Thanks, > > > Mike > > > > > > - > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org > > > For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@maven.apache.org > > > > > > > > > - > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org > > For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@maven.apache.org > > > > > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@maven.apache.org > > -- - Arnaud Héritier http://aheritier.net Mail/GTalk: aheritier AT gmail DOT com Twitter/Skype : aheritier
Re: Maven Docker Images
I guess the natural follow-on question is whether the Maven community would consider publishing an official set of images? Or alternatively whether they should send a takedown notice to protect their brand and trademarks... On 2017-10-18 18:36, "Manfred Moser" wrote: > No. As you can see from the github URL this is NOT an apache URL. > > https://github.com/carlossg/docker-maven > > > Mike Drob wrote on 2017-10-18 16:32: > > > Hello, > > > > Are the images at https://hub.docker.com/r/_/maven/ considered to be > > official > > maven docker images and blessed/published by the PMC? > > > > Thanks, > > Mike > > > > - > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org > > For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@maven.apache.org > > > > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@maven.apache.org > > - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@maven.apache.org
Re: Maven Docker Images
No. As you can see from the github URL this is NOT an apache URL. https://github.com/carlossg/docker-maven Mike Drob wrote on 2017-10-18 16:32: > Hello, > > Are the images at https://hub.docker.com/r/_/maven/ considered to be official > maven docker images and blessed/published by the PMC? > > Thanks, > Mike > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@maven.apache.org > - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@maven.apache.org
Maven Docker Images
Hello, Are the images at https://hub.docker.com/r/_/maven/ considered to be official maven docker images and blessed/published by the PMC? Thanks, Mike - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@maven.apache.org
