These images are kindly managed by a PMC member of our project (Carlos) but yes they aren't managed directly by the project
We can easily see with him to improve this IMO. When he started that (several years ago) Docker wasn't what it is nowadays. With docker being mainstream I agree that we can reconsider this. The docker image build/distribution could perhaps be part of our release process. WDYT Carlos ? On Thu, Oct 19, 2017 at 4:16 AM, Mike Drob <[email protected]> wrote: > I guess the natural follow-on question is whether the Maven community > would consider publishing an official set of images? Or alternatively > whether they should send a takedown notice to protect their brand and > trademarks... > > On 2017-10-18 18:36, "Manfred Moser" <[email protected]> wrote: > > No. As you can see from the github URL this is NOT an apache URL. > > > > https://github.com/carlossg/docker-maven > > > > > > Mike Drob wrote on 2017-10-18 16:32: > > > > > Hello, > > > > > > Are the images at https://hub.docker.com/r/_/maven/ considered to be > official > > > maven docker images and blessed/published by the PMC? > > > > > > Thanks, > > > Mike > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > > > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > > -- ----- Arnaud Héritier http://aheritier.net Mail/GTalk: aheritier AT gmail DOT com Twitter/Skype : aheritier
