Re: dependency:analyze controversial result
activemq-all, as its name suggests, bundles third-party dependencies in its JAR (rather than declaring them as dependencies), and it happens to include slf4j: http://grepcode.com/snapshot/repo1.maven.org/maven2/org.apache.activemq/activemq-all/5.11.1 So I suppose, the first run finds slf4j classes in activemq-all so it marks the slf4j dependency as "unused declared". Do not ever use "uberjars" as dependencies, and report it upstream if it comes as a transitive dependency of a third party (and in the meantime, exclude the transitive dependency and add the proper non-uberjar dependencies instead). On Wed, May 17, 2017 at 10:14 AM Kristof Meixner < kristof.meix...@fatlenny.net> wrote: > Hi! > > Maybe I was too unclear about the specific problem. > > I've got a project that has org.slf4j:slf4j-api:1.7.12 as dependency as it > uses the Logger in the Java code. The > dependency is declared in POM but comes also as a transitive dependency. > > When running 'dependency:analyze' it is marked as 'unused declared'. When > I remove the dependency from the POM, and run > 'dependency:analyze' again it is marked as 'used undeclared'. Furthermore, > in the first case suddenly another dependency > [1] is marked as 'used undeclared' although it is never used directly. > > Best regards > Kristof > > [1] org.apache.activemq:activemq-all:5.11.1 > > On 05/16/2017 08:13 PM, Alexander Kriegisch wrote: > > Maybe because > > > > a) your project uses dependencies which were never declared explicitly > > in any of your POMs and > > b) at least some of your modules have dependencies declared which are > > not actually used in your code? > > > > What do you think? > > > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@maven.apache.org > >
Re: dependency:analyze controversial result
Hi! Maybe I was too unclear about the specific problem. I've got a project that has org.slf4j:slf4j-api:1.7.12 as dependency as it uses the Logger in the Java code. The dependency is declared in POM but comes also as a transitive dependency. When running 'dependency:analyze' it is marked as 'unused declared'. When I remove the dependency from the POM, and run 'dependency:analyze' again it is marked as 'used undeclared'. Furthermore, in the first case suddenly another dependency [1] is marked as 'used undeclared' although it is never used directly. Best regards Kristof [1] org.apache.activemq:activemq-all:5.11.1 On 05/16/2017 08:13 PM, Alexander Kriegisch wrote: > Maybe because > > a) your project uses dependencies which were never declared explicitly > in any of your POMs and > b) at least some of your modules have dependencies declared which are > not actually used in your code? > > What do you think? > - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@maven.apache.org
Re: dependency:analyze controversial result
Maybe because a) your project uses dependencies which were never declared explicitly in any of your POMs and b) at least some of your modules have dependencies declared which are not actually used in your code? What do you think? -- Alexander Kriegisch https://scrum-master.de Kristof Meixner schrieb am 16.05.2017 19:50: > Hi! > > When I run 'mvn dependency:analyse' on my project several dependencies get > mentioned in the 'Used undeclared > dependencies' as well as in the 'Unused declared dependencies' section. Any > idea why? > > Best regards > Kristof Meixner - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@maven.apache.org
