Re: Aoo 4.1.0

2014-05-16 Thread Isch

Hallo,

habe nichts gemacht, heute läuft es auf alle Fälle ohne Probleme.
Warum? Keine Ahnung.
Von den 5 Mirrors waren die Dateigrößen die WIN mir sagt zwar 
verschieden ich habe einfach die Größte genommen.


Gruß
Christian

Am 06.05.2014 16:02, schrieb Isch:

Hallo,

seit heute wird die neue Version angezeigt, bzw. kann per Download 
bezogen werden.
Doch die WIN - Version habe ich inzwischen von verschiedenen Mirrors 
bezogen, in verschiedenen größen, doch bei allen wird festgestellt. 
Kann nicht installiert werden weil nicht komplett.

Ach ich habe WIN 8.1 ohne Virus etc.. Version 4.0.1 läuft ohne Probleme.

Gruß
Christian

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-de-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-de-h...@openoffice.apache.org




-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-de-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-de-h...@openoffice.apache.org



Re: Integration des dt. Wörterbuches in mein kürzlich install. App Andropen office Ver 1.5

2014-05-16 Thread Heinz-Stefan Neumeyer
Am Donnerstag, den 08.05.2014, 15:36 +0200 schrieb Brosemann:


Hallo Bernd


snip Endloszeile entsorgt snap

Du meinst das Projekt/Programm AdrOpenoffice?

Dann glaube ich, daß Du hier nicht an der richtigen Stelle bist. Was
dort angeboten wird ist keine Bestandteil des OpenOffice- bzw.
Apache-OO-Projektes, sondern eine eigenständige Entwicklung.
Ich kann Dir auch nur so viel sagen, daß man bei alle Versuche an dieses
Projekt selbst heranzukommen auf mehr oder weniger dubiosen asiatischen
Seiten landen. Und das schafft IMHO nicht gerade Vertrauen.

-- 
Gruß Stefan
 
Die e-Mail-Adresse nimmt grundsätzlich keine privaten Nachrichten
entgegen.
Solche bitte an 
 
hsn.neumeyer[dot]arcor.de 
 
senden.
GnuPG-Schluesselkennung für diese Adresse: 7C9AB525
Für dort unverschlüsselt eingehende Nachrichten behalte ich mir vor 
diese nicht zu beachten!


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


Eifügen fehlende Pictograme i.d. Taskleiste

2014-05-16 Thread T. Somogyi
Nochmals: Ich schreibe etwas und möchte z.B. eine Buchstabe oder ein Befehl
rückgängig machen. Ich kann aber die Schaltfläche Rückgängig nicht
betätigen, weil sie grau und inaktiv ist.Diese Schaltfläche funktioniert
nicht.

Aber:
Ich komme langsam zur Ansicht, daß dieses Problem irgendwie mit dem Upgrade
von Windows 8 auf 8.1 zusammenhängt. Da funktionieren einige andere
Programme ebenfalls nicht: Photo Director, Gmail Notifier Pro. Ich habe
deswegen beim HP (Gerätehersteller, auf dessen PC (neu gekauft vor 3
Wochen) Windows 8 und Photo Director vorinstalliert war. Ein Techniker hat
mir das upgrade (8.1) gemacht und ich entdecke täglich was Neues, was nicht
richtig funktioniert.
Also bei HP (Servicepunkt für Zypern, wo ich lebe, befindet sich in
Griechenland) sagte mir, daß alles am Windows 8.1 liegt und ich sollte zum
Windows 8 zurückkehren. Der große Kenner behauptete auch, daß Open Office
sei ein Microsoft Produkt. I
Ich habe auch Microsoft in Nicosia (Servicepunkt für Zypern) gesprochen.
Die nette Dame meinte, daß es in der Tat eventuell am Windows 8.1 liegen
würde, weil es noch nicht ganz ausgereift sei.
Ich will mich diese Tage Schlau machen und Microsoft in USA anrufen. Leider
funktioniert der Serviceknopf zu dem Service nicht (!!!), und so muß ich
mir Microsoft skypen und sie bitten mich anzurufen. Mal sehen, was die zu
sagen haben.

Ach, wo sind die guten Zeiten des Microsoft Office unter Windows XP... Da
hatte ich keine Probleme dieser Art...

Gruß aus Zypern
Tamar Somogyi


Re: Eifügen fehlende Pictograme i.d. Taskleiste

2014-05-16 Thread Dave
Ja ... windows 8.1 und die anderen. Ich habe mittlerweile bei ca. 20
Studentinnen an unserem Fachbereich Ubuntu installiert, und dann hören die
Probleme auf. Ich selbst bin seit mehreren Jahren weg von Windows. Auf
einem 5 Jahre altem iMac habe ich mittlerweile ebenfalls Ubuntu
installiert. Alles problemlos. LG, Dave


2014-05-15 15:11 GMT+02:00 T. Somogyi t.somo...@gmail.com:

 Nochmals: Ich schreibe etwas und möchte z.B. eine Buchstabe oder ein Befehl
 rückgängig machen. Ich kann aber die Schaltfläche Rückgängig nicht
 betätigen, weil sie grau und inaktiv ist.Diese Schaltfläche funktioniert
 nicht.

 Aber:
 Ich komme langsam zur Ansicht, daß dieses Problem irgendwie mit dem Upgrade
 von Windows 8 auf 8.1 zusammenhängt. Da funktionieren einige andere
 Programme ebenfalls nicht: Photo Director, Gmail Notifier Pro. Ich habe
 deswegen beim HP (Gerätehersteller, auf dessen PC (neu gekauft vor 3
 Wochen) Windows 8 und Photo Director vorinstalliert war. Ein Techniker hat
 mir das upgrade (8.1) gemacht und ich entdecke täglich was Neues, was nicht
 richtig funktioniert.
 Also bei HP (Servicepunkt für Zypern, wo ich lebe, befindet sich in
 Griechenland) sagte mir, daß alles am Windows 8.1 liegt und ich sollte zum
 Windows 8 zurückkehren. Der große Kenner behauptete auch, daß Open Office
 sei ein Microsoft Produkt. I
 Ich habe auch Microsoft in Nicosia (Servicepunkt für Zypern) gesprochen.
 Die nette Dame meinte, daß es in der Tat eventuell am Windows 8.1 liegen
 würde, weil es noch nicht ganz ausgereift sei.
 Ich will mich diese Tage Schlau machen und Microsoft in USA anrufen. Leider
 funktioniert der Serviceknopf zu dem Service nicht (!!!), und so muß ich
 mir Microsoft skypen und sie bitten mich anzurufen. Mal sehen, was die zu
 sagen haben.

 Ach, wo sind die guten Zeiten des Microsoft Office unter Windows XP... Da
 hatte ich keine Probleme dieser Art...

 Gruß aus Zypern
 Tamar Somogyi



Re: Suggestion.

2014-05-16 Thread mt

On 14/5/14 at 12:17 PM, j...@jt-mj.net (Julian Thomas) wrote:



As a longtime Star office and now OO user, I am new to styles.  
I'd still like to see some helpful information on how to get 
started with styles (better than 'my pets' and 'my cats'; [I 
tried those tutorials and they didn't work very well for me]) 
and a reference.




Sorry I can't help Julian, I have found no tutorials at all. I'm 
used to learning by reading the manual and then lots of trial 
and error, and after investing many hours doing just that, I 
have found that using styles can save some time with complex documents.


(I write and translate books, so using styles was forced on me 
by my editors, a dozen years ago or so. As of today, I am still 
sort of unsure what amount of time I have *effectively* saved by 
learning how to use styles - but I was given no option, and now 
that I've grown accustomed to styles, it's possible I am 
starting to save time. Twelve years, and many books down the 
track!  :]  )


To those who chimed in to justify styles: it is quite obvious to 
me that you are missing the point. For starters, it sounds like 
you don't really know WordPerfect, and imagine Reveal codes to 
be something other than it was.


But more basically, OpenOffice is for people like Julian and me. 
If people like me and Julian put forward a suggestion, it should 
be the programmer's job to consider it from the user's 
perspective... or shouldn't it??


Again, I would like to say thank you to those who give their 
time for free to build and improve OpenOffice. This includes 
those who put forward useful suggestions from the user's 
perspective :-)


marina


---
List Conduct Guidelines: http://openoffice.apache.org/list-conduct.html
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@openoffice.apache.org



Re: Suggestion.

2014-05-16 Thread Andrea Pescetti

Julian Thomas wrote:

As a longtime Star office and now OO user, I am new to styles.  I'd
still like to see some helpful information on how to get started with
styles (better than 'my pets' and 'my cats'; [I tried those tutorials
and they didn't work very well for me]) and a reference.


We are preparing new documentation under the Apache License here:
https://wiki.openoffice.org/wiki/Documentation/UserGuide/Writer/Styles
Feel free to review and improve it. If you need a wiki account, just ask 
here (this applies to everybody on this list, of course).


Regards,
  Andrea.

---
List Conduct Guidelines: http://openoffice.apache.org/list-conduct.html
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@openoffice.apache.org



Re: Suggestion.

2014-05-16 Thread mt

On 14/5/14 at 4:12 AM, bbyfi...@axion.net (Bruce Byfield) wrote:


On Wednesday 14 May 2014 05:29:45 PM Brian Barker wrote:

At 23:38 14/05/2014 +1000, Marina Tadiello wrote:

In general, and from a user's perspective, Styles are one example of
how common users are encouraged (or forced? :-) to think (program)
and behave like computers.


Yes, manual formatting is available. But using it is kind of 
perverse, because it means doing more work than necessary, and 
cutting yourself off from important features.




Mh, this really depends.


Here's how I describe manual formatting in the introduction to 
the book I'm in the middle of completing:


Office suites are as old as the personal computer. Yet, after 
more than thirty years, few of us have bothered to learn how to 
use them.


Oh, we have learned how to get things done in them. Most of us 
can format a document and print it out, after a fashion. But 
what we haven't learned is to do these things efficiently, 
taking advantage of all the tools that are available.
It is as if we have learned enough about cars to go down hill 
in them and coast across level ground, but never learned about 
the ignition. We get things done, but with more effort and less 
efficiency that we should. Some tasks, like going uphill, we 
don't imagine are even possible because of our limited view.





I'm not disagreeing with you. I'm simply asking that user 
perspective is taken into consideration at least as much as the 
programmer's own.


The starting point ought always to be that computers are there 
to aid humans. And not all humans take to computing as well as 
programmers do. It's just obvious to me - why should it sound so 
strange to programmers? :-)


Also, your comments do not address the main point in my message, 
which was about revealing codes for document options that go 
beyond plain styling.


marina



---
List Conduct Guidelines: http://openoffice.apache.org/list-conduct.html
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@openoffice.apache.org



Re: Please remove me from the email list. thank you.

2014-05-16 Thread 許哲崇
Don't you need us, or don't we need you?
Have a nice day.


2014-05-08 7:49 GMT+08:00 Misty Day timesmith...@att.net:


 On 2014-05-06 18:30, Misty Day wrote:



 --


 Kind Regards,

 Misty Day
 714-982-2619
 www.timesmithing.webstarts.com
 Skype:  misty.day.c.a.p.




Re: not working version of OO4.1.0

2014-05-16 Thread Martin Groenescheij
Under Windows you need to end the soffice.bin and / or soffice.exe 
processes before you can install or uninstall OpenOffice.


On 14-5-2014 22:02, Maurice Dorscheidt wrote:

Hello,

I am getting a bit :o . I downloaded the newest version of OO 4.1.0 
because the older version said: new update available. since I have 
downloaded the new file NOTHING works any more.
I can not install OO because of a fail 1316 some windownsinstaller 
file for Open Office401msi will not work. tried to uninstall the older 
version and clean my PC.

Can not uninstall due to the same failure?

please help! I need OO for school and have to write some reports. my 
time is running out and Open Office worked always and I used it with 
great pleasure but now it gives me a lot of anger and frustration.


Maybe it is just a minor thing I have overlooked, but I do know what 
to do now.


kind regards,

Maurice from Sweden

P.S you can answer in swedish, english or dutch





Re: not working version of OO4.1.0

2014-05-16 Thread Brian Barker

At 14:02 14/05/2014 +0200, Maurice Dorscheidt wrote:
I am getting a bit :o . I downloaded the newest version of OO 4.1.0 
because the older version said: new update available. since I have 
downloaded the new file NOTHING works any more. I can not install OO 
because of a fail 1316 some windows installer file for Open 
Office401msi will not work. tried to uninstall the older version and 
clean my PC. Can not uninstall due to the same failure?


There is nothing wrong with the version of OpenOffice; instead, 
something has become corrupt in your Windows installation that is 
preventing installation or removal. Windows Installer error 1316 
tends to happen if your system is restarted or powered off when a 
previous installation was incomplete. You may need local expert help 
to put things right with your PC before you can successfully install 
and use your new version of OpenOffice.


Here are a few things to try:

o Remember to restart your system whenever prompted to, as well as 
before and after using some of these techniques.


o Do you remember when you first tried to update the product? Use 
Windows' System Restore facility to return your system to a 
checkpoint before the problem occurred. You will now get back to your 
previous version of OpenOffice and can - at your leisure - remove 
this and carry out the new installation correctly.


o Is your current download corrupt? Delete the downloaded 
installation file (not the installed program itself). Go to the web 
site (www.openoffice.org) and download a new copy of the current 
version. Try the installation again.


o Go to Control Panel and attempt use the proper technique to remove 
any versions of OpenOffice listed there.


o Where is your downloaded copy of the new version? If it is not on 
your PC's hard drive, copy it there. Restart your system and try the 
installation again.


o If all this fails, go to 
http://support.microsoft.com/mats/Program_Install_and_Uninstall and 
run the Microsoft Program Install and Uninstall troubleshooter. 
Follow the instructions carefully. Restart your system and try the 
installation again.


I trust this helps.

Brian Barker


---
List Conduct Guidelines: http://openoffice.apache.org/list-conduct.html
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@openoffice.apache.org



Second attempt to send

2014-05-16 Thread Art9ca
X   
  May 15, 2014
 
Dear Ms/Mr? Carson, (at car...@wistly.net)
 
IF YOU CAN THINK OF ANY EARTHLY EXCUSE NOT TO REPLY TO THIS LETTER, PLEASE  
DO SO.
 
Thank you very much for your prompt, and comprehensible, response to my  
take-a-chance query. It was very reassuring -- unfortunately (for you), it  
also emboldens me to refine my questions/fears more specifically.
 
Please pardon the imposition of some history but it may serve to specify  
more exactly my dilemma/uncertainty.
 
I am a retired physician (Internal Medicine, for 50 years) whose hobby has  
long been crosswords. Since 1986 (when I first began constructing puzzles, 
I  have had over 700 published in every medium conceivable here in the USA)
 
In my early constructing days, there was (to me, at least) no computer  
stuff available. I would lay out a page with my ruler, fill in the black 
squares  with pencil and then start constructing. It was a real pain because 
the  
necessary changes as the construction proceeded would make holes in the 
paper --  and that meant starting on another sheet. All this was exceeded in 
frustration  only by the drudgery of typing clues in one column, solutions in 
another -- and  then finding one had to retype the whole thing because of a 
skipped  clue/solution.(I have never learned to type so it's always 
hunt-and-peck for  me). Then the manuscript was snail-mailed to my various 
editors.
 
All this changed when an astrophysicist (I believe) (in England somewhere)  
came up with his 
crossword puzzle constructing software. It is expensive but  all my editors 
want it used. No snail mail, at all, to anyone.
 
You enter his program and start to work. You can put the black squares  
anywhere you want, delete them easily, put them elsewhere, etc. etc. (It's an  
extremely complex program doing all kinds of multi-national puzzles 
diagrams,  etc. I only use the basic American section.)
 
Now the specific specifics: I use the computer to type in the letters for  
the puzzle words, change black squares, etc. Then I choose (still in his  
program) Clues and I make up my definitions, type them in, erase them. etc. 
in  a wonderfully less drudgery manner.
 
I have no idea what his mechanisms are for any of this stuff. Nor would I  
be capable of comprehending them. I just do them,
 
Then, when the puzzle is finished and ready to be attached to my e-mail to  
the editor, I call up the puzzle on my flash drive. My big time editors 
(at  Simon and Schuster, Dell, etc) also have that same program installed so 
all I  have to do is attach my puzzle icon to the e-mail and it gets there 
intact  somehow.
 
BUT, some of the local newspapers and magazines who publish my stuff are  
not in the crossword puzzle business. They are publishing tons of other stuff 
 and have no reason to fork over money for the program.
 
This was the solution arrived at after many trial and error failures::Call  
up the puzzle on the flash drive. (By now it is already a creature of the  
program because it was constructed in that program) Go to file, then 
export  in his program. For some editors, I then switch from whatever appears 
on the  screen to picture. I select Jpeg and now export the puzzle, in 
its changed  form, back to my flash drive, ready to be attached to my e-mail 
to the editor. I  do this twice: once for the GRID page and once for the 
SOLUTION page. Other  editors want these 2 things in PDF (whatever that means) 
rather than picture.  The program easily allows for both the GRID and 
SOLUTION pages to be so  prepared.
 
At last: the problem: (Up until last week, when I downloaded Open Office  
--a freebie -- so that I could access my many Word documents from my XP 
machine.  ((I now have a Dell Inspiron tabletop and Windows 8.1) all that I am 
about to  describe went smoothly both when I had Word on my XP and for the 3 
months I had  only WordPad on my 8.1. 
 
I would call up from my flash drive the puzzle, switch from picture or  
PDF, choose plain text and only CLUES from the File section of the  
program. For the non-big-time editors, I then have to call up CLUES and  
modify/correct it to the extent that I have to type in the formal name of the  
puzzle and the name of the constructor (me) both at top and bottom. I save it 
 and now all is ready to be attached to the e-mail
 
BUT, BUT, last week, when I clicked on clues (to put in the puzzle title  
and my name), for the first time ever a screen came up called ASCII Filter  
Options. It had 3 properties: Character set: Arabic (ISO-8859-6) Default 
fonts:  Times New Roman (I use Arial 10) and Language: English (USA). At the 
bottom of  this screen was: Paragraph break: CR  LF were highlighted while 
CR and LF  by themselves were not highlighted.
 
When I said OK, a new screen opened. It was called Open Office 4.0.1 These  
words now appeared: This document may contain formatting or 

Re: Suggestion.

2014-05-16 Thread Bruce Byfield
On Thursday 15 May 2014 06:03:34 PM mt wrote:
 
 I'm not disagreeing with you. I'm simply asking that user
 perspective is taken into consideration at least as much as the
 programmer's own.

So far as I'm concerned, anything that saves me time and effort is taking my 
perspective as a user into consideration.
 
 Also, your comments do not address the main point in my message,
 which was about revealing codes for document options that go
 beyond plain styling.

I'm not sure what you mean here. Can you give an example of options that go 
beyond plain styling? 

-- 
Bruce Byfield 604-421-7189 (on Pacific time)
blog: https://brucebyfield.wordpress.com
website: http://members.axion.net/~bbyfield/

---
List Conduct Guidelines: http://openoffice.apache.org/list-conduct.html
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@openoffice.apache.org



Re: Suggestion.

2014-05-16 Thread Peter Johansson
On Fri, May 16, 2014 at 12:03 AM, Jim McLaughlin
jjim.mclaugh...@gmail.com wrote:

 What fascinates me is that other than the three defender's of OO
 orthodoxy regarding styles ve. alternative methods, like a WP reveal
 codes approach, the overwhelming majority of posters appear to desire the
 WP/Corel Reveal Codes option to the very steep learning curve of the
 styles  approach.

It is all a matter of where you want to spend your time.  Those who
prefer to spend it up front go with styles.  Those who don't prefer
embedded codes.  Those who prefer embedded codes rarely realize just
how much time they are wasting at the back end on every document, or
how much time they could be saving overall by learning how to use, and
then using styles.

Of course, it is not exactly as simple as this.  Personally, I learned
of and how to use the style model back in 1987 when I learned LaTeX as
that was the only way to drive the spiffy new DEC LN03 laser printer
at my university.  It was around that time when I replaced my Apple 2
with a 286 PC and quickly found WordPerfect absolutely horrid by
comparison.  To this day, I still prefer the semantic mark-up of LaTeX
for text-based document.

Sadly, as brutal as developing styles in TeX can be, developing styles
in a GUI/WYSIWYG is really not all that much better -- at least from
what I have seen from my casual investigation over the years.  But
another sad reality is that while anyone can put in the time and learn
how to use styles, not everyone can learn how to produce an
aesthetically pleasing design.

That said, it then becomes clear that the proper workflow model is to
have *one* person in an organization develop style sheets and then
require  everyone else to actually use them -- regardless of what
software you are using.  Sadly, this model seems to be rarely
implemented.

-p.

---
List Conduct Guidelines: http://openoffice.apache.org/list-conduct.html
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@openoffice.apache.org



Unable to Complete Registration

2014-05-16 Thread Robert Palmer
Dear Users:
   I have been unable to complete registration the the Open 
Office Community Forum. I have registered under the name Bindyi, at address 
bin...@icloud.com. I cannot reregister because the email address is in use, 
but the link to complete registration does not reach my email inbox.

I have requested that the registration key be resent, 
which the site said it did, but I had my inbox open in an adjacent farm, and no 
message arrived.

The online advice given was to contact a forum 
moderator, but i do not know who they are.

My problem with Open Office is that when in Text, and I 
start a numbered list, it works OK until 9, but for 10 and subs, it inserts a 
tab space after each number, which I cannot get rid of.

Kindly send instructions, as to how I may complete 
registration.

Robert


Re: Suggestion.

2014-05-16 Thread Dan Lewis

On 05/14/2014 10:17 PM, Julian Thomas wrote:

On 14 May 2014, at 09:38, mt m...@lockedbags.org wrote:


While I have learned how to (use and) appreciate the Styles features, I agree that not 
everything in every given text document is prone to being styled.

As a longtime Star office and now OO user, I am new to styles.  I'd still like 
to see some helpful information on how to get started with styles (better than 
'my pets' and 'my cats'; [I tried those tutorials and they didn't work very 
well for me]) and a reference.

jt


---
List Conduct Guidelines: http://openoffice.apache.org/list-conduct.html
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@openoffice.apache.org


 Chapter 6 and 7 of the Writer Guide available at this link:
https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Documentation/Publications#LibreOffice_Writer_Guide

--Dan

---
List Conduct Guidelines: http://openoffice.apache.org/list-conduct.html
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@openoffice.apache.org



Re: Suggestion

2014-05-16 Thread Brian Barker

At 18:03 15/05/2014 +1000, Marina Tadiello wrote:
I'm simply asking that user perspective is taken into consideration 
at least as much as the programmer's own. The starting point ought 
always to be that computers are there to aid humans. And not all 
humans take to computing as well as programmers do. It's just 
obvious to me - why should it sound so strange to programmers? :-)


Come, come: this is entirely a straw man! No-one writing user 
software fails to take users and their humanity into account - and 
you do the very kind developers of OpenOffice (with whom, for the 
avoidance of doubt, I have no connection) a serious disservice by 
suggesting that they do. The styles you deplore are surely designed 
with users and their needs in mind, not with any convenience of 
programming. Your desire for the software to be user-friendly is of 
course spot on, but your conclusion that this end is provided by 
reveal codes is totally wrong.


It's interesting that you failed to reply to my earlier comments (not 
that you have any responsibility to do so, of course) and that you 
excised my comments from the message to which you did reply (though 
unhelpfully leaving my name in). What should we deduce from this: 
that my suggestions were so much to the point that you cannot fault them?!


Since you are still asking for a low-level approach to word 
processing on the pretext of wanting a high-level approach, it may be 
worth exercising the argument further. There are three possible 
reasons, I suggest, for wanting reveal codes.


1. The first is that you actually want to be able to see *how* the 
program works - in other words, you are a geek and want to think like 
a programmer, not like a true user. There is nothing wrong with that: 
it's like the person who buys a new gadget and wants - before s/he 
uses it - to take it apart and see not how to use it but how it 
actually works. This person, when they look at a car with the 
prospect of buying it, does not sit in the driving seat and get the 
feel of the controls, but instead opens the bonnet and starts 
fiddling with the engine components. You claim not to be this person, 
but you nevertheless ask to see the innards of the program.


2. The second possibility is that you are dissatisfied with the way 
that OpenOffice (in particular, Writer) displays the structure (as 
distinct from the appearance) of any document. You perhaps inherit a 
document from elsewhere and need to know how to modify it as you 
need. For that, you need to be able to see its structure. I have to 
say that I cannot disagree with such a suggestion! In case anyone 
doesn't know what I mean, let me give a simple example. Suppose you 
have two similar-looking tables with one immediately following the 
other - with no intervening element, that is. There is no easy way to 
see immediately that you have two tables and not just one, longer 
table. But the two cases behave differently, and you need to know 
which you have in order to be able to handle the document 
efficiently. (Yes, there are ways to see which you have, but they are 
indirect and not very obvious.) The solution to this, though, is to 
improve the display of document structure, not to ask to look inside 
the program. If you need to know when your car is low on fuel, you 
ask for a fuel gauge on the dashboard, not an external dipstick on 
the fuel tank.


3. When you revealed codes in Word Perfect, you could, I think, 
tinker with them: you could edit the codes directly, deleting one 
here and entering a new one there. Indeed, I think that was their 
purpose: Word Perfect would sometime get itself in a twist and end up 
with inconsistent tags in a document - and the solution offered by 
its developers was to show the user the internal workings of the 
program and insist that they tinkered with them to achieve what was 
necessary. In this way, they were insisting that users (temporarily?) 
became programmers, not (as you seem to think) the other way about. 
But as soon as you allow users to *modify* any such tags, you 
immediately lose the integrity of the tags: it's just as easy to 
delete one tag of a pair and leave the other or to add an unbalanced 
tag or to insert a misspelled one as to do something meaningful. Word 
Perfect offered a facility for you to sort out its mistakes, but what 
you are asking for is a recipe for users' creating confused and 
incorrect documents.


It's perhaps also worth saying that the idea of reveal codes 
implies the existence of such codes in the first place. In other 
words, you are assuming that the internal model of the program labels 
the structure through tags - as a mark-up language does. But this is 
only one way for programs and documents to behave - and many don't.


Do you know the best way? My ideal word processor would not be at all 
wysiwyg; instead it would concentrate on displaying plain text with 
all the structure of the document. You would not see the appearance 
of the 

Re: Rory Server Failure

2014-05-16 Thread japples

I got impatient - how do I resubscribe to the list?

Thank you
Jack

Rory O'Farrell wrote:

On Wed, 14 May 2014 17:21:00 -0700
Robert Palmer bin...@icloud.com wrote:

  

Dear Users:
   I have been unable to complete registration the the Open 
Office Community Forum. I have registered under the name Bindyi, at address 
bin...@icloud.com. I cannot reregister because the email address is in use, 
but the link to complete registration does not reach my email inbox.

I have requested that the registration key be resent, 
which the site said it did, but I had my inbox open in an adjacent farm, and no 
message arrived.

The online advice given was to contact a forum 
moderator, but i do not know who they are.

My problem with Open Office is that when in Text, and I 
start a numbered list, it works OK until 9, but for 10 and subs, it inserts a 
tab space after each number, which I cannot get rid of.

Kindly send instructions, as to how I may complete 
registration.

Robert



Due to a server failure there is backlog which was 9 million emails, but which 
is now down to a couple of million; your response is probably still in that 
backlog. I'm seeing a lag of 8-10 hours on some of my emails through that 
server, which is probably controlled by a push-down stack - list in, first out.

The problem with the numbered list is that the first tab is set too close to  
the digits. When one goes over 9, the indent jumps to the next tab. The answer 
is simple - adjust the first tab to be a little bigger, or simple delete it, so 
that the numbering, be it 1-9 or 10-99, uses the second (now become the first) 
tab.


  


Re: Saving word processor text:

2014-05-16 Thread Rory O'Farrell
On Thu, 15 May 2014 08:40:08 -0400
Michael mmassar...@comcast.net wrote:

 When I save my work in the Open Office word processor it becomes distorted. I 
 use win 7 Home Edition. What could be the possible cause for this. I can save 
 Open Office templates and other work, just not the word processor text. 
 Please respond ASAP. Thank You!

We need more information. In what format are you saving. What sort of 
distortion?


-- 
Rory O'Farrell ofarr...@iol.ie

---
List Conduct Guidelines: http://openoffice.apache.org/list-conduct.html
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@openoffice.apache.org



Re: Unable to Complete Registration

2014-05-16 Thread Rory O'Farrell
On Wed, 14 May 2014 17:21:00 -0700
Robert Palmer bin...@icloud.com wrote:

 Dear Users:
I have been unable to complete registration the the 
 Open Office Community Forum. I have registered under the name Bindyi, at 
 address bin...@icloud.com. I cannot reregister because the email address is 
 in use, but the link to complete registration does not reach my email inbox.
 
   I have requested that the registration key be resent, 
 which the site said it did, but I had my inbox open in an adjacent farm, and 
 no message arrived.
 
   The online advice given was to contact a forum 
 moderator, but i do not know who they are.
 
   My problem with Open Office is that when in Text, and I 
 start a numbered list, it works OK until 9, but for 10 and subs, it inserts a 
 tab space after each number, which I cannot get rid of.
 
   Kindly send instructions, as to how I may complete 
 registration.
 
 Robert

Due to a server failure there is backlog which was 9 million emails, but which 
is now down to a couple of million; your response is probably still in that 
backlog. I'm seeing a lag of 8-10 hours on some of my emails through that 
server, which is probably controlled by a push-down stack - list in, first out.

The problem with the numbered list is that the first tab is set too close to  
the digits. When one goes over 9, the indent jumps to the next tab. The answer 
is simple - adjust the first tab to be a little bigger, or simple delete it, so 
that the numbering, be it 1-9 or 10-99, uses the second (now become the first) 
tab.


-- 
Rory O'Farrell ofarr...@iol.ie

---
List Conduct Guidelines: http://openoffice.apache.org/list-conduct.html
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@openoffice.apache.org



Re: OPENOFFICE USERS LIST -- PLEASE READ

2014-05-16 Thread sam zeleski
Thanks.


On Sat, May 10, 2014 at 10:50 AM, Rob Weir robw...@apache.org wrote:

 The Apache mailing lists have been down due to a hardware failure.
 More information can be found on the ASF Infrastructure blog here:

 https://blogs.apache.org/infra/entry/mail_outage

 If you are reading this note that means that the lists are back up
 (yeah!) and the queued up list traffic is now being delivered.   When
 this happens, expect some confusion, including:

 1) List subscribers surprised or confused by the sudden surge of
 traffic as the queued up emails are delivered.

 2) Some requests to unsubscribe because of 1) above.

 3) Some repeat emails from people who didn't get a response to their
 original posts because the lists were down.  Some of them may be
 irate.

 4) Some test emails from people trying to figure out why their email
 was not coming through.

 So it will be messy  Let's not make this messier than it is.
 Consider this note (and the linked blog post) to be an adequate
 response to anyone asking about the mail outage.  I'd recommend
 focusing on any backed up product support questions.

 Thanks for your patience and understanding!

 Regards,

 -Rob, Your Friendly List Moderator

 ---
 List Conduct Guidelines: http://openoffice.apache.org/list-conduct.html
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
 For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@openoffice.apache.org




-- 
Reduce, Repair, Reuse, Recycle


Re: Link a cell in spreadsheet to a folder in 'my docs'

2014-05-16 Thread Andrea Pescetti

On 12/05/2014 Bentalls Bracknell wrote:

Is it possible to change a cell to a button and link to a folder in 'my docs' 
please?


To link to a folder, use Insert - Hyperlink and use file:/// as 
target. You can then refine it to specify the exact folder. You can 
probably turn this into a button following the same pattern, but it is 
simpler to use a normal hyperlink.


Regards,
  Andrea.

---
List Conduct Guidelines: http://openoffice.apache.org/list-conduct.html
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@openoffice.apache.org



Re: OpenOffice mac

2014-05-16 Thread Andrea Pescetti

On 12/05/2014 mt wrote:

On 8/5/14 at 7:33 PM, der_...@rocketmail.com (der_ron) wrote:

Please could you make new releases available on mac osx 10.6?
10.6 is 5 years old ...

Is there somewhere an explanation of what older Mac users are missing
out on?


It is a purely technical choice we had to make to take advantage of 
64-bit Mac OS X applications and avoid the dependency on now deprecated 
build tools. It was discussed at length on the dev list, since it was 
clear that we needed to drop support for older Mac OS X releases in 
order to better support the newer ones.


See https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=122301 and the Release 
Notes 
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/AOO+4.1+Release+Notes 
for more information.


It is unlikely that support for Mac OS X 10.6 or earlier is restored in 
future; to be precise, it is considered to be a huge task and not worth 
the effort; but if volunteers show up who can either port OpenOffice 
4.1.0 to older Mac OS X systems or provide extended support/bugfixes 
port for version 4.0.1 on older Mac OS X systems, they will be welcome.


Regards,
  Andrea.

---
List Conduct Guidelines: http://openoffice.apache.org/list-conduct.html
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@openoffice.apache.org



Re: not working version of OO4.1.0

2014-05-16 Thread Rory O'Farrell
On Wed, 14 May 2014 14:02:30 +0200
Maurice Dorscheidt fam.barbap...@hotmail.se wrote:

 Hello,
 
 I am getting a bit :o . I downloaded the newest version of OO 4.1.0 
 because the older version said: new update available. since I have 
 downloaded the new file NOTHING works any more.
 I can not install OO because of a fail 1316 some windownsinstaller file 
 for Open Office401msi will not work. tried to uninstall the older 
 version and clean my PC.
 Can not uninstall due to the same failure?
 
 please help! I need OO for school and have to write some reports. my 
 time is running out and Open Office worked always and I used it with 
 great pleasure but now it gives me a lot of anger and frustration.
 
 Maybe it is just a minor thing I have overlooked, but I do know what to 
 do now.
 
 kind regards,
 
 Maurice from Sweden
 
 P.S you can answer in swedish, english or dutch

Possible solutions at this site
http://www.error1316.com/

If no success post to 
https://forum.openoffice.org/en/forum/


-- 
Rory O'Farrell ofarr...@iol.ie

---
List Conduct Guidelines: http://openoffice.apache.org/list-conduct.html
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@openoffice.apache.org



Re: Suggestion.

2014-05-16 Thread circulars
Thinking on, all of the attributes of a style are listed in one of the 
organizer tab in the 'paragraph style' dialog, which would seem to go quite 
some way towards meeting the needs of those who liked the reveal codes feature. 
(It is accessible on a mac by control clicking in the style concerned, then 
selecting 'edit paragraph style... ' from the menu. Presumably a left (?) click 
on other operating systems.)
Maybe if this were more readily accessible via the drop down menus and an icon 
(neither seem to exist at present) and the facility flagged up prominently in 
help, including an entry titled 'reveal codes', this would help to keep folk 
happy?
More generally, am not sure the 'blame the user' approach which seems to be 
developing in this thread is constructive or conducive with community. Better 
we recognise that there is going to be a very wide diversity of abilities, 
opinions and ways of working amongst 100 million plus users, respect those, 
allow for flexibility where that can be reasonably achieved, and aim for a 
simple and intuitive user interface without the need for steep learning curves 
where they can possibly be avoided.

- Original Message -
From: Brian Barker
Sent: 05/14/14 05:29 PM
To: users@openoffice.apache.org
Subject: Re: Suggestion.

At 23:38 14/05/2014 +1000, Marina Tadiello wrote: In general, and from a 
user's perspective, Styles are one example of how common users are encouraged 
(or forced? :-) to think (program) and behave like computers. It's perhaps 
worth pointing out that the truth is diametrically opposite to this claim! 
Users who ask to reveal codes are asking to look at the inner workings of the 
program and to see how (they perceive that) it and the computer actually work. 
Developers who offer facilities such as styles are allowing users to use 
programs and computers in the way *the users* think, not how the machinery 
does. If you want, say, a paragraph to be indented, you want the paragraph 
indented, pure and simple. And that's what styles allow you to say. If you 
prefer the codes, you need to say Start indenting the text from this point 
onwards and separately Stop the indenting of text that you have been 
practising up to now. That's the way programs and computers may need to think, 
but it i
 s not the way real users do naturally. Have you ever been asked to 
double-space a document? Probably. Has anyone ever asked you instead to set 
double spacing at the beginning of the document and then turn it off at the 
end? Of course not: that's not how people think and speak! This is not 
necessarily the best way to ensure user satisfaction. 1. Remember that local 
formatting is still available: no-one is forced to use styles. 2. Many users 
are most satisfied using a word processor as if it were a typewriter. Their 
satisfaction should not be allowed to limit the advancement of software and 
facilities that can be appreciated by others. Brian Barker 
--- List Conduct Guidelines: 
http://openoffice.apache.org/list-conduct.html To unsubscribe, e-mail: 
users-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: 
users-h...@openoffice.apache.org


Fwd: not working version of OO4.1.0

2014-05-16 Thread Martin Groenescheij

As your not subscribed you will not see any of the responses you question.

 Original Message 
Subject:not working version of OO4.1.0
Date:   Wed, 14 May 2014 14:02:30 +0200
From:   Maurice Dorscheidt fam.barbap...@hotmail.se
Reply-To:   users@openoffice.apache.org
To: users@openoffice.apache.org



Hello,

I am getting a bit :o . I downloaded the newest version of OO 4.1.0
because the older version said: new update available. since I have
downloaded the new file NOTHING works any more.
I can not install OO because of a fail 1316 some windownsinstaller file
for Open Office401msi will not work. tried to uninstall the older
version and clean my PC.
Can not uninstall due to the same failure?

please help! I need OO for school and have to write some reports. my
time is running out and Open Office worked always and I used it with
great pleasure but now it gives me a lot of anger and frustration.

Maybe it is just a minor thing I have overlooked, but I do know what to
do now.

kind regards,

Maurice from Sweden

P.S you can answer in swedish, english or dutch





Re: PASSWORD CHANGE

2014-05-16 Thread Hagar Delest

Le 07/05/2014 00:50, Kay Schenk a écrit :

On 05/06/2014 03:24 PM, JOSEPH A. BUDRECKI JR wrote:

HELLO

I HAVE BEEN TRYING TO CHANGE MY PASSWORD AND CAN'T GET INTO A LINK TO DO
THIS . IS THERE ANY HELP AVAILABLE FOR THIS . JAB


What system does this password apply to?



For the record, you've an account in the forum (username = joebud).
Click the forgotten password link to get a reactivation link.

As a courtesy I have sent a copy of this reply to you as well as to the mailing list. 
Do Not reply to me personally but just to the list at 
users@openoffice.apache.org - replies to my personal email address will be 
ignored.

Since you are not subscribed to this list you may not see all the replies to 
your query.
To subscribe Apache OpenOffice mailing lists go to
http://openoffice.apache.org/mailing-lists.html
NB: this is more a message for the users mailing list than for the devs.

For user support you can also use The OpenOffice.org Community Forum
https://forum.openoffice.org/en/forum/

Regards,
Hagar

---
List Conduct Guidelines: http://openoffice.apache.org/list-conduct.html
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@openoffice.apache.org



Re: not working version of OO4.1.0

2014-05-16 Thread Maurice Dorscheidt

Hello,

The message says:

failure 1316 and due to this I can not uninstall the older version of 
OO4.0.1

due to the same error I can not install the newest version 4.1.0

I tried to uninstall but it requests the missing 401.msi.

I don't know what to do?

Maurice



Carson Chittom skrev 15-5-2014 0:55:

Maurice Dorscheidt fam.barbap...@hotmail.se writes:


I am getting a bit :o . I downloaded the newest version of OO 4.1.0
because the older version said: new update available. since I have
downloaded the new file NOTHING works any more.

I understand that you're frustrated, but NOTHING works is not a
summary of your problem(s) that enables us to help you.  What are you
trying to do?  What is OpenOffice doing when you do that?  What error
message (if any) do you see?  What operating system is this on?  (Seems
like Windows from what's in your message, but it never hurts to ask.)


I can not install OO because of a fail 1316 some windownsinstaller
file for Open Office401msi will not work. tried to uninstall the older
version and clean my PC.

What does the error message say?  What error to you get when you try to
uninstall the older version?  Can you install/uninstall other software?


---
List Conduct Guidelines: http://openoffice.apache.org/list-conduct.html
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@openoffice.apache.org









Re: not working version of OO4.1.0

2014-05-16 Thread Jim McLaughlin
Google 401.msi

The msi extension is a  Microsift Installer file.

I found a series of conversations back in November, 2013 regarding 401.msi
errors for OO with a  purported link to a file source to fix thise errors.
Following is what I found:

*openoffice401*.*msi* download -
2sharedhttp://www.2shared.com/file/4iqcHDSx/openoffice401.html
www.2shared.com/file/4iqcHDSx/openoffice*401*.html
Nov 13, 2013 - Here you can download file *openoffice401*. 2shared gives
you an excellent opportunity to store your files here and share them with
others.

There are a whole lot more references to 401.msi on Google, but I'm not
going to look at all of them since I'm not having the problem.  You might
want to Google 401.msi yourself.


IF YOU DOWNLOAD A FILE FROM THE WILD, BE SURE YOUR ANTIVIRUS PROTECTIONS
ARE WORKING, and examine the download carefully for trojans, virii,, and
other nastiness before installing it anywhere.

I had a  similar issue with an HP printer which wanted a TrayApp.msi.
That is an HP written installer file for a feature for my HP printer.  I
felt safer with a  file from HP, but still ran it through Kaspersky before
using it.  The .msi from HP did solve my printer issue.  I have no idea if
the 401.msi out there in the wild will solve your OO issue.

If you do try the 401.msi, please let us all know what happens.

Good luck.


On Thu, May 15, 2014 at 3:33 AM, Maurice Dorscheidt 
fam.barbap...@hotmail.se wrote:

 Hello,

 The message says:

 failure 1316 and due to this I can not uninstall the older version of
 OO4.0.1
 due to the same error I can not install the newest version 4.1.0

 I tried to uninstall but it requests the missing 401.msi.

 I don't know what to do?

 Maurice



 Carson Chittom skrev 15-5-2014 0:55:

 Maurice Dorscheidt fam.barbap...@hotmail.se writes:

  I am getting a bit :o . I downloaded the newest version of OO 4.1.0
 because the older version said: new update available. since I have
 downloaded the new file NOTHING works any more.

 I understand that you're frustrated, but NOTHING works is not a
 summary of your problem(s) that enables us to help you.  What are you
 trying to do?  What is OpenOffice doing when you do that?  What error
 message (if any) do you see?  What operating system is this on?  (Seems
 like Windows from what's in your message, but it never hurts to ask.)


  I can not install OO because of a fail 1316 some windownsinstaller
 file for Open Office401msi will not work. tried to uninstall the older
 version and clean my PC.

 What does the error message say?  What error to you get when you try to
 uninstall the older version?  Can you install/uninstall other software?



 ---
 List Conduct Guidelines: http://openoffice.apache.org/list-conduct.html
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
 For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@openoffice.apache.org









Re: Problem with impress

2014-05-16 Thread 許哲崇
Please try 'Character Map' in 'System Tools' in 'Accessories' in Windows
start menu.
Character Map can put much more characters into your file than keyboard.


2014-05-03 20:52 GMT+08:00 Brian Barker b.m.bar...@btinternet.com:

 At 19:23 03/05/2014 +0700, René or Brigit Noname wrote:

 In Impress I can not found this icon [pilcrow] for display not printable
 sign. How can activate them?


 I don't think you can. You could copy any text and paste it into a text
 (Writer) document, which will then display some of what you need: you could
 spot double spaces, paragraph breaks, inappropriate tabs, and so on. This
 may (or may not) be a workaround.

 Here's another trick: you can search for non-printing characters using
 [:cntrl:] . This will discover some such characters in a presentation, but
 not all. You can also search for tabs using \t - and so on.

 I trust this helps.

 Brian Barker


 ---
 List Conduct Guidelines: http://openoffice.apache.org/list-conduct.html
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
 For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@openoffice.apache.org




Re: Suggestion.

2014-05-16 Thread Felmon Davis

On Wed, 14 May 2014, Brian Barker wrote:



[...]

Have you ever been asked to double-space a document? Probably. Has anyone 
ever asked you instead to set double spacing at the beginning of the document 
and then turn it off at the end? Of course not: that's not how people think 
and speak!





[sorry for snipping so much context!]

I probably don't grasp your idea here but there's nothing unhuman 
about being asked to set double-spacing from one spot in a document to 
another (or more plausibly, to indent from here to there).


of course this is a very good use for styles. I use both styles and 
direct formatting ('like a typewriter') according to my needs and 
purposes though since 'default formatting' is itself a 'style', I 
guess one always uses styles.


not directed at you specifically but I see no need to be dogmatic; I'm 
happy enough with using these tools to fit my needs but I definitely 
would love it if 'reveal codes' were possible as I've run across 
situations where there's a bit of code 'stuck' somewhere doing devilry 
and it's hard to find. cutting and pasting in again without formatting 
is clumsy.


F.


--
Felmon Davis

It's hard to keep your shirt on when you're getting something off your chest.

---
List Conduct Guidelines: http://openoffice.apache.org/list-conduct.html
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@openoffice.apache.org



Re: Suggestion.

2014-05-16 Thread Jim McLaughlin
This has been a  very interesting thread.

It has also been the single most posted to thread I've seen in the six or
so months I've been a subscrber to this group.

What fascinates me is that other than the three defender's of OO
orthodoxy regarding styles ve. alternative methods, like a WP reveal
codes approach, the overwhelming majority of posters appear to desire the
WP/Corel Reveal Codes option to the very steep learning curve of the
styles  approach.

Food for thought.

If the programmers behind OO want to provide a word processor which will
attract users, and avoid the very high costs of the MJKS or Corel products,
those programmers might want to seriously consider the efficacy of
providing what the users who have expressed an opinion appear to want,
rather tahn take the ...my way or the highway... approach expresseed here
so far.

Not trying to start a pissing contest.  Just pointing out what the
admittedly unscientifif opinion sample in this thread has so far shown.

Is there a  technical reason why a Corel/WP Reveal Codes function can not
be implemented in 5.x.x?


On Wed, May 14, 2014 at 3:38 PM, Doug dmcgarr...@optonline.net wrote:


 On 05/14/2014 02:12 PM, Bruce Byfield wrote:

 On Wednesday 14 May 2014 05:29:45 PM Brian Barker wrote:

 At 23:38 14/05/2014 +1000, Marina Tadiello wrote:

 In general, and from a user's perspective, Styles are one example of
 how common users are encouraged (or forced? :-) to think (program)
 and behave like computers.

 Yes, manual formatting is available. But using it is kind of perverse,
 because
 it means doing more work than necessary, and cutting yourself off from
 important features.

 Here's how I describe manual formatting in the introduction to the book
 I'm in
 the middle of completing:

 Office suites are as old as the personal computer. Yet, after more than
 thirty
 years, few of us have bothered to learn how to use them.

 Oh, we have learned how to get things done in them. Most of us can
 format a
 document and print it out, after a fashion. But what we haven't learned
 is to
 do these things efficiently, taking advantage of all the tools that are
 available.

 It is as if we have learned enough about cars to go down hill in them and
 coast across level ground, but never learned about the ignition. We get
 things
 done, but with more effort and less efficiency that we should. Some
 tasks, like
 going uphill, we don't imagine are even possible because of our limited
 view.

  I, being an enemy of styles, in general, explain myself thusly: I
 probably
 never write anything more than three pages long. I am not writing a book.
 I don't have chapters. I don't use bulletted lists, altho I might if
 bullets were easier to use _without_ styles! I don't have Front Pages or
 whatever chapter heads are called in fancy books. I don't have chapters
 at all, so I don't need pages that end in the middle before going on with
 my text.  I don't even indent paragraphs, but if I wanted to, it would be
 no big deal to push the tab key. (Actually, most word-processors have a
 format command that would do that for me, if I wanted it.) And since I
 don't write books, or edit them  or publish them, i don't need a desktop
 publisher, which is what _I_ think OO/LO are aiming to be.

 On the other hand, if I needed a desktop publisher, and didn't want to
 or could not afford to purchase a professional one, I would certainly
 look at the possibility of learning and using OO/LO. From what I read
 in these lists, that would be a real possibility. Someone who is willing to
 spend the time to actually write a book can probably afford the time to
 learn desktop publishing.

 One more thing: I am not in any way trying to dissuade anyone from
 learning OO/LO, if that's what they want. I am, however, pointing out
 that it is hardly worth the effort for the average memo writer, letter
 writer, or even article writer. It would be like a numismatist learning
 metallurgy!

 I rest my case.

 --doug




 ---
 List Conduct Guidelines: http://openoffice.apache.org/list-conduct.html
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
 For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@openoffice.apache.org




openoffice4.1.0

2014-05-16 Thread lam maizy
 Dear sir,

I had upgrade the version of open office 4.1.0, after installed it when I open 
the old file, somethings can't run as the same before, example the company head 
address, how can I do to fit it properly, thank you for your attention.
---
List Conduct Guidelines: http://openoffice.apache.org/list-conduct.html
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@openoffice.apache.org



Re: Suggestion.

2014-05-16 Thread Bruce Byfield
On Thursday 15 May 2014 09:03:13 PM Jim McLaughlin wrote:

 the overwhelming majority of posters appear to desire the
 WP/Corel Reveal Codes option 

Really? I don't mean to be contentious, but I didn't see an overwhelming 
majority on either side.

 If the programmers behind OO want to provide a word processor which will
 attract users, and avoid the very high costs of the MJKS or Corel products,
 those programmers might want to seriously consider the efficacy of
 providing what the users who have expressed an opinion appear to want,
 rather tahn take the ...my way or the highway... approach expresseed here
 so far.

All major office suites, including WordPefect, are most efficient when styles 
are 
used. OpenOffice Writer is an extreme example of using styles, but that's also 
what makes it so powerful. And for some people, like the writers of technical 
manuals, styles are absolutely essential for their work.

Writer does allow you to format manually, if you really insist. In fact, some 
innovations, such as the sidebar, chiefly aid manually formatting. However, I 
would hate, for example, to create a table of contents without heading styles; 
I would have to go through the entire document and create each entry one at a 
time, instead of having them ready to use when I want the TOC.

But you can only accommodate people's unwillingness to learn or to help 
themselves so far. You wouldn't expect to sit down and play a game without 
learning how it was structured, so why would you expect to do so with an office 
suite? Beyond a certain point, people have to help themselves.

If people don't want to learn how to use Writer the way it was designed, they 
might be better off with some simpler tool. AbiWord might be a good choice for 
such people; it's one of the few word processors I know that might be said to 
be oriented towards manual formatting.

 
 Is there a  technical reason why a Corel/WP Reveal Codes function can not
 be implemented in 5.x.x?

See my previous post about past discussions of the subject. One potential 
problem is that unlike WordPerfect, OpenOffice doesn't store information in a 
single file. An OpenOffice file is really a collection of several compressed 
files. 

Under these circumstances, a Reveal Code feature is not impossible, but it is 
more complicated than in WordPerfect. It means another way for files to corrupt 
as information passes back and forth between the actual files and the Reveal 
Code Screen, and would be high maintenance, since every new feature would 
require revisions to it.

I don't speak for anyone except myself. However, given that there is a lot to 
do already with maintaining and cleaning the aging code, I doubt that 
developers would make Reveal Codes a high priority unless there was a lot more 
enthusiasm that has been shown so far. 

-- 
Bruce Byfield 604-421-7189 (on Pacific time)
blog: https://brucebyfield.wordpress.com
website: http://members.axion.net/~bbyfield/

---
List Conduct Guidelines: http://openoffice.apache.org/list-conduct.html
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@openoffice.apache.org



Re: Suggestion.

2014-05-16 Thread Peter Johansson
On Fri, May 16, 2014 at 3:12 AM, mt m...@lockedbags.org wrote:

 To those who chimed in to justify styles: it is quite obvious to me that you
 are missing the point. For starters, it sounds like you don't really know
 WordPerfect, and imagine Reveal codes to be something other than it was.

I can't speak for the others, but as someone who worked helpdesk
support in the days of WordPerfect 4.2 I am well aware of what reveal
codes does.  Fixing peoples fubared documents in reveal codes what 90%
of that job.

If your word processor requires reveal codes to fix formatting issues
it is fundamentally flawed in other ways.  The proper fix is *not* to
add reveal codes, but rather to address the fundamental problems
directly so that reveal codes is not necessary in the first place.

-p.

---
List Conduct Guidelines: http://openoffice.apache.org/list-conduct.html
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@openoffice.apache.org



Re: Suggestion.

2014-05-16 Thread Julian Thomas


 But more basically, OpenOffice is for people like Julian and me. If people 
 like me and Julian put forward a suggestion, it should be the programmer's 
 job to consider it from the user's perspective... or shouldn't it??
On 16 May 2014, at 03:12, mt m...@lockedbags.org wrote:

 Sorry I can't help Julian, I have found no tutorials at all. I'm used to 
 learning by reading the manual and then lots of trial and error, and after 
 investing many hours doing just that, I have found that using styles can save 
 some time with complex documents.

As I said earlier, I'm struggling with styles [since it seems to be the way to 
go, I need to get up to speed] but need something more than 'my pets' and 'my 
cats' - particularly with regard to list formatting [mixing numbered lists and 
bulleted subitems under the numbered items; this has always been a major hassle 
without styles].

curmedgeon on
Features without good documentation are barely usable.

/curmedgeon off

jt


---
List Conduct Guidelines: http://openoffice.apache.org/list-conduct.html
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@openoffice.apache.org



Re: Suggestion.

2014-05-16 Thread James Knott
On 05/16/2014 09:29 PM, Bruce Byfield wrote:
 If people don't want to learn how to use Writer the way it was designed, they 
 might be better off with some simpler tool.

Notepad?  ;-)


---
List Conduct Guidelines: http://openoffice.apache.org/list-conduct.html
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@openoffice.apache.org