[ovirt-users] Re: oVirt 4.3.5/6 HC: Reinstall fails from WEB UI
Can anyone point out if this "https://access.redhat.com/documentation/en-us/red_hat_hyperconverged_infrastructure_for_virtualization/1.6/html-single/automating_rhhi_for_virtualization_deployment/index; works for a 3 node hyperconverged setup in ovirt? I have tried it and seems that every time I get different errors, does not matter if I use Dell HW or HPE HW. Maybe I am not following it properly or not all the full documentation for oVirt HI deployment with ansible is out there for an automated deployment on a 3 node setup, if you can point me to the right documentation I would appreciate it, for now I am only doing WEB UI deployments. thanks, Adrian ___ Users mailing list -- users@ovirt.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@ovirt.org Privacy Statement: https://www.ovirt.org/site/privacy-policy/ oVirt Code of Conduct: https://www.ovirt.org/community/about/community-guidelines/ List Archives: https://lists.ovirt.org/archives/list/users@ovirt.org/message/KPNPJ5VISXKFYQI2LUI5MELSKVFQ5MIA/
[ovirt-users] Re: Fencing Agent using SuperMicro IPMI Fails
>>>Congratulations LOL, yes That's just about right. I'd say I agree with you. The language used in the error output wasn't real clear to me either. I'll have to add something in the docs that say: ***WARNING/*** Fencing will not work on a single host. You must have at least 2 hosts in the cluster for fencing to work properly. ___ Users mailing list -- users@ovirt.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@ovirt.org Privacy Statement: https://www.ovirt.org/site/privacy-policy/ oVirt Code of Conduct: https://www.ovirt.org/community/about/community-guidelines/ List Archives: https://lists.ovirt.org/archives/list/users@ovirt.org/message/DWELA6CNQYGB7RIFG42RSWOCF3ZWUYCE/
[ovirt-users] Re: Fencing Agent using SuperMicro IPMI Fails
Congratulations.. in my case I fail to see that message on the logs quite some time ago so I normally do two or more hosts and then do fencing. On Sun, Oct 20, 2019, 3:37 PM wrote: > Oh wait! Now I see what you mean: > Test failed: Failed to run fence status-check on host > 'vmh.cyber-range.lan'. No other host was available to serve as proxy for > the operation. > > The 2nd host would be the proxy... Well bummer. > ___ > Users mailing list -- users@ovirt.org > To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@ovirt.org > Privacy Statement: https://www.ovirt.org/site/privacy-policy/ > oVirt Code of Conduct: > https://www.ovirt.org/community/about/community-guidelines/ > List Archives: > https://lists.ovirt.org/archives/list/users@ovirt.org/message/3WHRAGIBUL2X7CR5JEZXLSNNR3ASE3Z5/ > ___ Users mailing list -- users@ovirt.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@ovirt.org Privacy Statement: https://www.ovirt.org/site/privacy-policy/ oVirt Code of Conduct: https://www.ovirt.org/community/about/community-guidelines/ List Archives: https://lists.ovirt.org/archives/list/users@ovirt.org/message/AY7KXYCV2SCRYDIF2FHEDLHXF2I2JY5I/
[ovirt-users] Re: Fencing Agent using SuperMicro IPMI Fails
I believe without the inclusion of a developer on this thread it makes sense not to work with a single host because if you're trying to test fencing (via the power management setup) then how the host will fence itself and validate it. This of course when testing with a single host. I believe the option is labeled incorrectly on ovirt because it should not be called power management if you're performing fencing with it. there should be a an explicit button or setup option for fencing and another one for power management things. this leads to confusing terms and this is one of the features that sometimes keep people from testing systems like ovirt and sticking with hyper-v or VMware where options are clearly described. once again it makes no sense to me to test fencing with a single host on my environment. that's why I believe developers failed to document the fact that you need at least two host to test fencing. I could be totally wrong but as I learn ovirt here I have never ever been able to test fencing with a single host, always with two or more hosts previously configured. On Sun, Oct 20, 2019, 3:26 PM wrote: > No just a single host. I didn't see any documentation that said you need > two or more hosts. You could be right. > > I did some further testing by installing ipmitool on my laptop. > [root@lt ~]# ipmitool -v -I lanplus -H 172.30.50.2 -U ADMIN session info > all > Password: > session handle: 0 > slot count: 16 > active sessions : 1 > user id : 2 > privilege level : ADMINISTRATOR > session type : IPMIv2/RMCP+ > channel number: 0x01 > > Maybe a one of the DEVs could chime in and confirm if this is expected > behavior? > ___ > Users mailing list -- users@ovirt.org > To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@ovirt.org > Privacy Statement: https://www.ovirt.org/site/privacy-policy/ > oVirt Code of Conduct: > https://www.ovirt.org/community/about/community-guidelines/ > List Archives: > https://lists.ovirt.org/archives/list/users@ovirt.org/message/WEXT7RKKBKIOFKWMZRSCJJE4U7MQ7LKZ/ > ___ Users mailing list -- users@ovirt.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@ovirt.org Privacy Statement: https://www.ovirt.org/site/privacy-policy/ oVirt Code of Conduct: https://www.ovirt.org/community/about/community-guidelines/ List Archives: https://lists.ovirt.org/archives/list/users@ovirt.org/message/LQLFUC3NEH4TDOJYSKNJI5WRSGBIHPTT/
[ovirt-users] Re: Fencing Agent using SuperMicro IPMI Fails
Oh wait! Now I see what you mean: Test failed: Failed to run fence status-check on host 'vmh.cyber-range.lan'. No other host was available to serve as proxy for the operation. The 2nd host would be the proxy... Well bummer. ___ Users mailing list -- users@ovirt.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@ovirt.org Privacy Statement: https://www.ovirt.org/site/privacy-policy/ oVirt Code of Conduct: https://www.ovirt.org/community/about/community-guidelines/ List Archives: https://lists.ovirt.org/archives/list/users@ovirt.org/message/3WHRAGIBUL2X7CR5JEZXLSNNR3ASE3Z5/
[ovirt-users] Re: Fencing Agent using SuperMicro IPMI Fails
No just a single host. I didn't see any documentation that said you need two or more hosts. You could be right. I did some further testing by installing ipmitool on my laptop. [root@lt ~]# ipmitool -v -I lanplus -H 172.30.50.2 -U ADMIN session info all Password: session handle: 0 slot count: 16 active sessions : 1 user id : 2 privilege level : ADMINISTRATOR session type : IPMIv2/RMCP+ channel number: 0x01 Maybe a one of the DEVs could chime in and confirm if this is expected behavior? ___ Users mailing list -- users@ovirt.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@ovirt.org Privacy Statement: https://www.ovirt.org/site/privacy-policy/ oVirt Code of Conduct: https://www.ovirt.org/community/about/community-guidelines/ List Archives: https://lists.ovirt.org/archives/list/users@ovirt.org/message/WEXT7RKKBKIOFKWMZRSCJJE4U7MQ7LKZ/
[ovirt-users] Re: Fencing Agent using SuperMicro IPMI Fails
You need to have two hosts up and running and members of same ovirt setup. It seems when you set up fencing, one host perform the test on the other one. in my Case I never been able to perform fencing setup properly unless I have a minimum of two nodes working. I use Tyan servers. Same setup/params as yours. Do you have two hosts up and running? On Sun, Oct 20, 2019, 12:58 PM wrote: > I did totally remove that value. It still fails. > ___ > Users mailing list -- users@ovirt.org > To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@ovirt.org > Privacy Statement: https://www.ovirt.org/site/privacy-policy/ > oVirt Code of Conduct: > https://www.ovirt.org/community/about/community-guidelines/ > List Archives: > https://lists.ovirt.org/archives/list/users@ovirt.org/message/LWQA536AZ773IJC5A3ZRU3BVKPZFAZSU/ > ___ Users mailing list -- users@ovirt.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@ovirt.org Privacy Statement: https://www.ovirt.org/site/privacy-policy/ oVirt Code of Conduct: https://www.ovirt.org/community/about/community-guidelines/ List Archives: https://lists.ovirt.org/archives/list/users@ovirt.org/message/TU3WKX7PD3J5BDIJCLMWZXKAB32VHW4A/
[ovirt-users] Re: Fencing Agent using SuperMicro IPMI Fails
I did totally remove that value. It still fails. ___ Users mailing list -- users@ovirt.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@ovirt.org Privacy Statement: https://www.ovirt.org/site/privacy-policy/ oVirt Code of Conduct: https://www.ovirt.org/community/about/community-guidelines/ List Archives: https://lists.ovirt.org/archives/list/users@ovirt.org/message/LWQA536AZ773IJC5A3ZRU3BVKPZFAZSU/
[ovirt-users] Re: Fencing Agent using SuperMicro IPMI Fails
I tried lanplus=0 and totally removing it. The result is the same, test failed. ___ Users mailing list -- users@ovirt.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@ovirt.org Privacy Statement: https://www.ovirt.org/site/privacy-policy/ oVirt Code of Conduct: https://www.ovirt.org/community/about/community-guidelines/ List Archives: https://lists.ovirt.org/archives/list/users@ovirt.org/message/JMP7QZN2CR3BD57U6U5JBWUZXRD4NS2I/
[ovirt-users] Re: Fencing Agent using SuperMicro IPMI Fails
Try switching off the lanplus (maybe remove it at all). Best Regards, Strahil NikolovOn Oct 20, 2019 20:14, jeremy_tourvi...@hotmail.com wrote: > > I am trying to setup my power management fencing agent on the host. > > Address: I put in the IP address of the web page for IPMI. (Which does work > via my web browser without issue) > Username: ADMIN > PW: my_password > Type: ipmilan > Options: lanplus=1 > > I click on the test button and it fails. > > Board Manufacturer: Supermicro > Board Product Name: X11DPi-N > > Any suggestions for troubleshooting? > > > ___ > Users mailing list -- users@ovirt.org > To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@ovirt.org > Privacy Statement: https://www.ovirt.org/site/privacy-policy/ > oVirt Code of Conduct: > https://www.ovirt.org/community/about/community-guidelines/ > List Archives: > https://lists.ovirt.org/archives/list/users@ovirt.org/message/OCFKLRXAOPG4FWGH2DOGSQS4HGGOBPIK/ ___ Users mailing list -- users@ovirt.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@ovirt.org Privacy Statement: https://www.ovirt.org/site/privacy-policy/ oVirt Code of Conduct: https://www.ovirt.org/community/about/community-guidelines/ List Archives: https://lists.ovirt.org/archives/list/users@ovirt.org/message/EAN7MSOQUZDAYAGBS3ENRTXJXNQ5W566/
[ovirt-users] Fencing Agent using SuperMicro IPMI Fails
I am trying to setup my power management fencing agent on the host. Address: I put in the IP address of the web page for IPMI. (Which does work via my web browser without issue) Username: ADMIN PW: my_password Type: ipmilan Options: lanplus=1 I click on the test button and it fails. Board Manufacturer: Supermicro Board Product Name: X11DPi-N Any suggestions for troubleshooting? ___ Users mailing list -- users@ovirt.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@ovirt.org Privacy Statement: https://www.ovirt.org/site/privacy-policy/ oVirt Code of Conduct: https://www.ovirt.org/community/about/community-guidelines/ List Archives: https://lists.ovirt.org/archives/list/users@ovirt.org/message/OCFKLRXAOPG4FWGH2DOGSQS4HGGOBPIK/
[ovirt-users] Ovirt Node 4.3.6 Logical Network Issue - Network Down
I have built a new host and my setup is a single hyperconverged node.. I followed the directions to create a new logical network. I see that the engine has marked the network as being down. (Hosts>Network Interfaces Tab>Setup Host Networks) Here is my network config on the host- [root@vmh ~]# ip a 1: lo: mtu 65536 qdisc noqueue state UNKNOWN group default qlen 1000 link/loopback 00:00:00:00:00:00 brd 00:00:00:00:00:00 inet 127.0.0.1/8 scope host lo valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever inet6 ::1/128 scope host valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever 2: enp96s0f0: mtu 1500 qdisc mq master ovirtmgmt state UP group default qlen 1000 link/ether 0c:c4:7a:f9:b9:88 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff 3: enp96s0f1: mtu 1500 qdisc mq state UP group default qlen 1000 link/ether 0c:c4:7a:f9:b9:89 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff inet 172.30.51.2/30 brd 172.30.51.3 scope global noprefixroute dynamic enp96s0f1 valid_lft 82411sec preferred_lft 82411sec inet6 fe80::d899:439c:5ee8:e292/64 scope link noprefixroute valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever 19: ;vdsmdummy;: mtu 1500 qdisc noop state DOWN group default qlen 1000 link/ether 96:e4:00:aa:71:f7 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff 23: ovs-system: mtu 1500 qdisc noop state DOWN group default qlen 1000 link/ether 36:0f:60:69:e1:2b brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff 24: br-int: mtu 1500 qdisc noop state DOWN group default qlen 1000 link/ether f6:3b:14:e1:15:48 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff 25: ovirtmgmt: mtu 1500 qdisc noqueue state UP group default qlen 1000 link/ether 0c:c4:7a:f9:b9:88 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff inet 172.30.50.3/24 brd 172.30.50.255 scope global dynamic ovirtmgmt valid_lft 84156sec preferred_lft 84156sec inet6 fe80::ec4:7aff:fef9:b988/64 scope link valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever 26: vnet0: mtu 1500 qdisc mq master ovirtmgmt state UNKNOWN group default qlen 1000 link/ether fe:16:3e:50:53:cd brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff inet6 fe80::fc16:3eff:fe50:53cd/64 scope link valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever VLAN 101 is attached to enp96s0f0 which is my ovirtmgmt interface. -IP range 172.30.50.x VLAN 102 is attached to enp96s0f1 which is my storage NIC for gluster. -IP range 172.30.51.x VLAN 103 is attached to enp96s0f1 is intended for most of my VMs that are not infrastructure related. -IP range 192.168.2.x I am pretty confident my router/switch is setup correctly.. As a test, I can go to localhost>networking>add VLAN and assign enp96s0f1 to VLAN 103 and it does get an IP address in the 192.168.2.x range. The host can also ping the 192.168.2.1 gateway. Why doesn't the engine think the VLAN is up? Which logs do I need to review? ___ Users mailing list -- users@ovirt.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@ovirt.org Privacy Statement: https://www.ovirt.org/site/privacy-policy/ oVirt Code of Conduct: https://www.ovirt.org/community/about/community-guidelines/ List Archives: https://lists.ovirt.org/archives/list/users@ovirt.org/message/E6QJMU327EYYOWRAAHCT666ZGQEY6NGS/
