[ovirt-users] Can't upgrade Cluster Compatibility Version
When trying to edit my default clusters compat version from 4.5 to anything newer it fails with " Error while executing action Edit Cluster properties: Internal Engine Error" engine.log contains the very long stack traces: ## 2022-08-31 23:43:08,647Z ERROR [org.ovirt.engine.core.bll.UpdateVmCommand] (default task-26) [590a6527] Error during ValidateFailure.: java.lang.NullPointerException at deployment.engine.ear.bll.jar//org.ovirt.engine.core.bll.UpdateVmCommand.validate(UpdateVmCommand.java:1015) at deployment.engine.ear.bll.jar//org.ovirt.engine.core.bll.CommandBase.internalValidateInTransaction(CommandBase.java:824) at org.ovirt.engine.core.utils//org.ovirt.engine.core.utils.transaction.TransactionSupport.executeInSuppressed(TransactionSupport.java:140) at org.ovirt.engine.core.utils//org.ovirt.engine.core.utils.transaction.TransactionSupport.executeInSuppressed(TransactionSupport.java:157) at deployment.engine.ear.bll.jar//org.ovirt.engine.core.bll.CommandBase.internalValidate(CommandBase.java:803) at deployment.engine.ear.bll.jar//org.ovirt.engine.core.bll.CommandBase.executeAction(CommandBase.java:417) at deployment.engine.ear.bll.jar//org.ovirt.engine.core.bll.executor.DefaultBackendActionExecutor.execute(DefaultBackendActionExecutor.java:13) at deployment.engine.ear.bll.jar//org.ovirt.engine.core.bll.Backend.runAction(Backend.java:450) at deployment.engine.ear.bll.jar//org.ovirt.engine.core.bll.Backend.runActionImpl(Backend.java:432) at deployment.engine.ear.bll.jar//org.ovirt.engine.core.bll.Backend.runInternalAction(Backend.java:638) at jdk.internal.reflect.GeneratedMethodAccessor380.invoke(Unknown Source) at java.base/jdk.internal.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43) at java.base/java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:566) at org.jboss.as.ee@24.0.1.Final//org.jboss.as.ee.component.ManagedReferenceMethodInterceptor.processInvocation(ManagedReferenceMethodInterceptor.java:52) at org.jboss.invocation@1.6.0.Final//org.jboss.invocation.InterceptorContext.proceed(InterceptorContext.java:422) at org.jboss.invocation@1.6.0.Final//org.jboss.invocation.InterceptorContext$Invocation.proceed(InterceptorContext.java:509) at org.jboss.as.weld.common@24.0.1.Final//org.jboss.as.weld.interceptors.Jsr299BindingsInterceptor.delegateInterception(Jsr299BindingsInterceptor.java:79) at org.jboss.as.weld.common@24.0.1.Final//org.jboss.as.weld.interceptors.Jsr299BindingsInterceptor.doMethodInterception(Jsr299BindingsInterceptor.java:89) at org.jboss.as.weld.common@24.0.1.Final//org.jboss.as.weld.interceptors.Jsr299BindingsInterceptor.processInvocation(Jsr299BindingsInterceptor.java:102) at org.jboss.as.ee@24.0.1.Final//org.jboss.as.ee.component.interceptors.UserInterceptorFactory$1.processInvocation(UserInterceptorFactory.java:63) at org.jboss.invocation@1.6.0.Final//org.jboss.invocation.InterceptorContext.proceed(InterceptorContext.java:422) at org.jboss.as.ejb3@24.0.1.Final//org.jboss.as.ejb3.component.invocationmetrics.ExecutionTimeInterceptor.processInvocation(ExecutionTimeInterceptor.java:43) at org.jboss.invocation@1.6.0.Final//org.jboss.invocation.InterceptorContext.proceed(InterceptorContext.java:422) at org.jboss.as.ee@24.0.1.Final//org.jboss.as.ee.concurrent.ConcurrentContextInterceptor.processInvocation(ConcurrentContextInterceptor.java:45) at org.jboss.invocation@1.6.0.Final//org.jboss.invocation.InterceptorContext.proceed(InterceptorContext.java:422) at org.jboss.invocation@1.6.0.Final//org.jboss.invocation.InitialInterceptor.processInvocation(InitialInterceptor.java:40) at org.jboss.invocation@1.6.0.Final//org.jboss.invocation.InterceptorContext.proceed(InterceptorContext.java:422) at org.jboss.invocation@1.6.0.Final//org.jboss.invocation.ChainedInterceptor.processInvocation(ChainedInterceptor.java:53) at org.jboss.as.ee@24.0.1.Final//org.jboss.as.ee.component.interceptors.ComponentDispatcherInterceptor.processInvocation(ComponentDispatcherInterceptor.java:52) at org.jboss.invocation@1.6.0.Final//org.jboss.invocation.InterceptorContext.proceed(InterceptorContext.java:422) at org.jboss.as.ejb3@24.0.1.Final//org.jboss.as.ejb3.component.singleton.SingletonComponentInstanceAssociationInterceptor.processInvocation(SingletonComponentInstanceAssociationInterceptor.java:53) at org.jboss.invocation@1.6.0.Final//org.jboss.invocation.InterceptorContext.proceed(InterceptorContext.java:422) at org.jboss.as.ejb3@24.0.1.Final//org.jboss.as.ejb3.tx.CMTTxInterceptor.invokeInNoTx(CMTTxInterceptor.java:232) at
[ovirt-users] Backporting of Fixes
I'm still running on oVirt 4.3 due to some hardware that will require some extra effort to move to 4.4 we're not quite ready to do yet, and am currently hitting what I believe to be https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1820998 which is fixed in 4.4. I'm wondering if there's a process to request a backport, or should I just open a new bug against 4.3? Thank You - Eric ___ Users mailing list -- users@ovirt.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@ovirt.org Privacy Statement: https://www.ovirt.org/privacy-policy.html oVirt Code of Conduct: https://www.ovirt.org/community/about/community-guidelines/ List Archives: https://lists.ovirt.org/archives/list/users@ovirt.org/message/6CNDJDE4RG6M24O5IKNNLNHELVBWVLPW/
[ovirt-users] Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: Storage Domain won't activate
On 9/4/20, 2:26 PM, "Nir Soffer" wrote: On Fri, Sep 4, 2020 at 5:43 PM Gillingham, Eric J (US 393D) via Users wrote: > > On 9/4/20, 4:50 AM, "Vojtech Juranek" wrote: > > On čtvrtek 3. září 2020 22:49:17 CEST Gillingham, Eric J (US 393D) via Users > wrote: > > how do you remove the fist host, did you put it into maintenance first? I > wonder, how this situation (two lockspaces with conflicting names) can occur. > > You can try to re-initialize the lockspace directly using sanlock command (see > man sanlock), but it would be good to understand the situation first. > > > Just as you said, put into maintenance mode, shut it down, removed it via the engine UI. Eric, it is possible that you shutdown the host too quickly, before it actually disconnected from the lockspace? When engine move a host to maintenance, it does not wait until the host actually move into maintenance. This is actually a bug, so it would be good idea to file a bug about this. That is a possibility, from the UI view it usually takes a bit for the host to show is in maintenance, so I assumed it was an accurate representation of the state. Unfortunately all hosts have since been completely wiped and re-installed, this issue brought down the entire cluster for over a day so I needed to get everything up again ASAP. I did not archive/backup the sanlock logs beforehand, so I can't check for the sanlock events David mentioned. When I cleared the sanlock there were no s or r entries listed in sanlock client status, and there were no other running hosts to obtain other locks, but I don’t fully grok sanlock if there was maybe some lock that existed only on the iscsi space separate from any current or past hosts. ___ Users mailing list -- users@ovirt.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@ovirt.org Privacy Statement: https://www.ovirt.org/privacy-policy.html oVirt Code of Conduct: https://www.ovirt.org/community/about/community-guidelines/ List Archives: https://lists.ovirt.org/archives/list/users@ovirt.org/message/O7LLWCIC76RPOXA4DCE2NTPWAZEBE6FK/
[ovirt-users] Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: Storage Domain won't activate
This is using iscsi storage. I stopped the ovirt broker/agents/vdsm and used
sanlock to remove the locks it was complaining about, but as soon as I started
the ovirt tools up and the engine came online again the same messages
reappeared.
After spending more than a day trying to resolve this nicely I gave up.
Installed ovirt-node on the host I originally removed, added that to the
cluster, then removed and nuked the misbehaving host and did a clean install
there. I did run into an issue where the first host had an empty
hosted-engine.conf, only had the cert and the id settings in it so it wouldn’t
connect properly, but I worked around that by just copying the fully populated
one from the semi-working host and changing the id to match.
No idea if this is the right solution but it _seems_ to be working and my VMs
are back to running, just got too frustrated trying to debug through normal
methods and finding solutions offered via the ovirt tools and documentation.
- Eric
On 9/4/20, 10:59 AM, "Strahil Nikolov" wrote:
Is this a HCI setup ?
If yes, check gluster status (I prefer cli but is also valid in the UI).
gluster pool list
gluster volume status
gluster volume heal info summary
Best Regards,
Strahil Nikolov
В петък, 4 септември 2020 г., 00:38:13 Гринуич+3, Gillingham, Eric J (US
393D) via Users написа:
I recently removed a host from my cluster to upgrade it to 4.4, after I
removed the host from the datacenter VMs started to pause on the second system
they all migrated to. Investigating via the engine showed the storage domain
was showing as "unknown", when I try to activate it via the engine it cycles to
locked then to unknown again.
/var/log/sanlock.log contains a repeating:
add_lockspace
e1270474-108c-4cae-83d6-51698cffebbf:1:/dev/e1270474-108c-4cae-83d6-51698cffebbf/ids:0
conflicts with name of list1 s1
e1270474-108c-4cae-83d6-51698cffebbf:3:/dev/e1270474-108c-4cae-83d6-51698cffebbf/ids:0
vdsm.log contains these (maybe related) snippets:
---
2020-09-03 20:19:53,483+ INFO (jsonrpc/6) [vdsm.api] FINISH
getAllTasksStatuses error=Secured object is not in safe state
from=:::137.79.52.43,36326, flow_id=18031a91,
task_id=8e92f059-743a-48c8-aa9d-e7c4c836337b (api:52)
2020-09-03 20:19:53,483+ ERROR (jsonrpc/6) [storage.TaskManager.Task]
(Task='8e92f059-743a-48c8-aa9d-e7c4c836337b') Unexpected error (task:875)
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/vdsm/storage/task.py", line 882,
in _run
return fn(*args, **kargs)
File "", line 2, in getAllTasksStatuses
File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/vdsm/common/api.py", line 50, in
method
ret = func(*args, **kwargs)
File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/vdsm/storage/hsm.py", line 2201,
in getAllTasksStatuses
allTasksStatus = self._pool.getAllTasksStatuses()
File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/vdsm/storage/securable.py", line
77, in wrapper
raise SecureError("Secured object is not in safe state")
SecureError: Secured object is not in safe state
2020-09-03 20:19:53,483+ INFO (jsonrpc/6) [storage.TaskManager.Task]
(Task='8e92f059-743a-48c8-aa9d-e7c4c836337b') aborting: Task is aborted:
u'Secured object is not in safe state' - code 100 (task:1181)
2020-09-03 20:19:53,483+ ERROR (jsonrpc/6) [storage.Dispatcher] FINISH
getAllTasksStatuses error=Secured object is not in safe state (dispatcher:87)
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/vdsm/storage/dispatcher.py", line
74, in wrapper
result = ctask.prepare(func, *args, **kwargs)
File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/vdsm/storage/task.py", line 108,
in wrapper
return m(self, *a, **kw)
File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/vdsm/storage/task.py", line 1189,
in prepare
raise self.error
SecureError: Secured object is not in safe state
---
2020-09-03 20:44:23,252+ INFO (tasks/2)
[storage.ThreadPool.WorkerThread] START task
76415a77-9d29-4b72-ade1-53207cfc503b (cmd=>, args=None) (thre
adPool:208)
2020-09-03 20:44:23,266+ INFO (tasks/2) [storage.SANLock] Acquiring
host id for domain e1270474-108c-4cae-83d6-51698cffebbf (id=1, wait=True)
(clusterlock:313)
2020-09-03 20:44:23,267+ ERROR (tasks/2) [storage.TaskManager.Task]
(Task='76415a77-9d29-4b72-ade1-53207cfc503b') Unexpected error (task:875)
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/vdsm/storage/task.py", line 882,
in _run
return fn(*args, **kargs)
File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/vdsm/storage/task.py", line 336,
in run
return self.cmd(*self.argslist, **self.argsdict)
File "/usr/lib/python2.7
[ovirt-users] Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: Storage Domain won't activate
On 9/4/20, 4:50 AM, "Vojtech Juranek" wrote: On čtvrtek 3. září 2020 22:49:17 CEST Gillingham, Eric J (US 393D) via Users wrote: > I recently removed a host from my cluster to upgrade it to 4.4, after I > removed the host from the datacenter VMs started to pause on the second > system they all migrated to. Investigating via the engine showed the > storage domain was showing as "unknown", when I try to activate it via the > engine it cycles to locked then to unknown again. > /var/log/sanlock.log contains a repeating: > add_lockspace > e1270474-108c-4cae-83d6-51698cffebbf:1:/dev/e1270474-108c-4cae-83d6-51698cf > febbf/ids:0 conflicts with name of list1 s1 > e1270474-108c-4cae-83d6-51698cffebbf:3:/dev/e1270474-108c-4cae-83d6-51698cf > febbf/ids:0 how do you remove the fist host, did you put it into maintenance first? I wonder, how this situation (two lockspaces with conflicting names) can occur. You can try to re-initialize the lockspace directly using sanlock command (see man sanlock), but it would be good to understand the situation first. Just as you said, put into maintenance mode, shut it down, removed it via the engine UI. ___ Users mailing list -- users@ovirt.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@ovirt.org Privacy Statement: https://www.ovirt.org/privacy-policy.html oVirt Code of Conduct: https://www.ovirt.org/community/about/community-guidelines/ List Archives: https://lists.ovirt.org/archives/list/users@ovirt.org/message/CDLMSS336Z46BNZ4K4IAWO6JBYAHAFDO/
[ovirt-users] Storage Domain won't activate
I recently removed a host from my cluster to upgrade it to 4.4, after I removed
the host from the datacenter VMs started to pause on the second system they all
migrated to. Investigating via the engine showed the storage domain was showing
as "unknown", when I try to activate it via the engine it cycles to locked then
to unknown again.
/var/log/sanlock.log contains a repeating:
add_lockspace
e1270474-108c-4cae-83d6-51698cffebbf:1:/dev/e1270474-108c-4cae-83d6-51698cffebbf/ids:0
conflicts with name of list1 s1
e1270474-108c-4cae-83d6-51698cffebbf:3:/dev/e1270474-108c-4cae-83d6-51698cffebbf/ids:0
vdsm.log contains these (maybe related) snippets:
---
2020-09-03 20:19:53,483+ INFO (jsonrpc/6) [vdsm.api] FINISH
getAllTasksStatuses error=Secured object is not in safe state
from=:::137.79.52.43,36326, flow_id=18031a91,
task_id=8e92f059-743a-48c8-aa9d-e7c4c836337b (api:52)
2020-09-03 20:19:53,483+ ERROR (jsonrpc/6) [storage.TaskManager.Task]
(Task='8e92f059-743a-48c8-aa9d-e7c4c836337b') Unexpected error (task:875)
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/vdsm/storage/task.py", line 882, in
_run
return fn(*args, **kargs)
File "", line 2, in getAllTasksStatuses
File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/vdsm/common/api.py", line 50, in method
ret = func(*args, **kwargs)
File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/vdsm/storage/hsm.py", line 2201, in
getAllTasksStatuses
allTasksStatus = self._pool.getAllTasksStatuses()
File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/vdsm/storage/securable.py", line 77,
in wrapper
raise SecureError("Secured object is not in safe state")
SecureError: Secured object is not in safe state
2020-09-03 20:19:53,483+ INFO (jsonrpc/6) [storage.TaskManager.Task]
(Task='8e92f059-743a-48c8-aa9d-e7c4c836337b') aborting: Task is aborted:
u'Secured object is not in safe state' - code 100 (task:1181)
2020-09-03 20:19:53,483+ ERROR (jsonrpc/6) [storage.Dispatcher] FINISH
getAllTasksStatuses error=Secured object is not in safe state (dispatcher:87)
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/vdsm/storage/dispatcher.py", line 74,
in wrapper
result = ctask.prepare(func, *args, **kwargs)
File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/vdsm/storage/task.py", line 108, in
wrapper
return m(self, *a, **kw)
File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/vdsm/storage/task.py", line 1189, in
prepare
raise self.error
SecureError: Secured object is not in safe state
---
2020-09-03 20:44:23,252+ INFO (tasks/2) [storage.ThreadPool.WorkerThread]
START task 76415a77-9d29-4b72-ade1-53207cfc503b (cmd=>, args=None) (thre
adPool:208)
2020-09-03 20:44:23,266+ INFO (tasks/2) [storage.SANLock] Acquiring host
id for domain e1270474-108c-4cae-83d6-51698cffebbf (id=1, wait=True)
(clusterlock:313)
2020-09-03 20:44:23,267+ ERROR (tasks/2) [storage.TaskManager.Task]
(Task='76415a77-9d29-4b72-ade1-53207cfc503b') Unexpected error (task:875)
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/vdsm/storage/task.py", line 882, in
_run
return fn(*args, **kargs)
File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/vdsm/storage/task.py", line 336, in run
return self.cmd(*self.argslist, **self.argsdict)
File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/vdsm/storage/sp.py", line 317, in
startSpm
self.masterDomain.acquireHostId(self.id)
File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/vdsm/storage/sd.py", line 957, in
acquireHostId
self._manifest.acquireHostId(hostId, wait)
File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/vdsm/storage/sd.py", line 501, in
acquireHostId
self._domainLock.acquireHostId(hostId, wait)
File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/vdsm/storage/clusterlock.py", line
344, in acquireHostId
raise se.AcquireHostIdFailure(self._sdUUID, e)
AcquireHostIdFailure: Cannot acquire host id:
('e1270474-108c-4cae-83d6-51698cffebbf', SanlockException(22, 'Sanlock
lockspace add failure', 'Invalid argument'))
---
Another symptom is in the hosts view of the engine SPM bounces between "Normal"
and "Contending". When it's Normal if I select Management -> Select as SPM I
get "Error while executing action: Cannot force select SPM. Unknown Data Center
status."
I've tried rebooting the one remaining host in the cluster no to avail,
hosted-engine --reinitialize-lockspace also seems to not solve the issue.
I'm kind of stumped as to what else to try, would appreciate any guidance on
how to resolve this.
Thank You
___
Users mailing list -- users@ovirt.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@ovirt.org
Privacy Statement: https://www.ovirt.org/privacy-policy.html
oVirt Code of Conduct:
https://www.ovirt.org/community/about/community-guidelines/
List Archives:
https://lists.ovirt.org/archives/list/users@ovirt.org/message/FMJZV2OEKHPTSTROSPLCQ3WJUIPB6CKL/
