Re: [ovirt-users] Network redundancy with Manual balancing per VLAN
Well, yes. That's actually the name VMware uses.
If it bring similar functionalities then that's the solution. Thanks for
sharing. looks pretty intresting.
Fernando
Em 27/06/2016 09:39, Fabrice Bacchella escreveu:
Isn't teaming[1] the futur, instead of bonding ?
[1] http://rhelblog.redhat.com/2014/06/23/team-driver/
Le 27 juin 2016 à 14:31, Fernando Frediani
<fernando.fredi...@upx.com.br <mailto:fernando.fredi...@upx.com.br>>
a écrit :
Thanks for the reply.
Perhaps is the case of contacting the maintainer of Linux Bond module
and see if there is room for this feature to be implement anytime.
OVS is great in the coming future, but Bond module is still something
very handy that simplify the things a lot.
Thanks
Fernando
Em 27/06/2016 03:00, Edward Haas escreveu:
On Sun, Jun 26, 2016 at 4:37 PM, Yevgeny Zaspitsky
<yzasp...@redhat.com> wrote:
Dan, Edy,
Could you guys answer this?
IIUC, the requirements are:
* stream the traffic of few VLANs(network roles) through a
single bond
* be able to bind a VLAN to a bond slave with an option of
fallback
* have redundancy
* assign different QoS to every VLAN (my addition)
I guess this is a new RFC that we do not support currently, but
would we be able to provide in any future?
-- Forwarded message --
From: *Fernando Frediani* <fernando.fredi...@upx.com.br>
Date: Sat, Jun 25, 2016 at 11:17 PM
Subject: [ovirt-users] Network redundancy with Manual balancing
per VLAN
To: users@ovirt.org <mailto:users@ovirt.org>
Hello,
In VMware it is possible to bond two network interfaces and for
each Portgroup (equivalent to a VLAN) is possible to tell which
of the physical interfaces underneath it you wish the traffic to
flow primarily and which stays as secondary(bond mode=1
equivalent). So for certain VLANs (Management, Live Migration,
etc) is possible to force traffic flow via one physical NIC of
the bond and for other VLANs (Virtual Machine's traffic) outs
via the other NIC with failover to each other should a cable or
switch fails.
This is specially good for better utilize the fewer NICs
available and still have redundancy.
In oVirt it is also possible to have bonds, but would it still
be possible to do that same and favor the traffic per VLAN basis
? I guess it is something related to Linux Bond module but
perhaps someone has done this already.
Thanks
Fernando
___
Users mailing list
Users@ovirt.org <mailto:Users@ovirt.org>
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Hello Fernando,
As you mentioned, oVirt is using the Linux Bond and the solution you
are looking for is not supported.
The oVirt way to handle this is by applying QoS on the networks,
providing the guaranteed rates for each and utilizing the bond for
throughput beyond the one link limit.
With the introduction of OVS as an alternative networking
infrastructure for the hosts, you could create a hook that
implements some special functionality, but ovs is not in yet.
Thanks,
Edy.
___
Users mailing list
Users@ovirt.org <mailto:Users@ovirt.org>
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
___
Users mailing list
Users@ovirt.org
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Re: [ovirt-users] Network redundancy with Manual balancing per VLAN
Isn't teaming[1] the futur, instead of bonding ? [1] http://rhelblog.redhat.com/2014/06/23/team-driver/ > Le 27 juin 2016 à 14:31, Fernando Frediani <fernando.fredi...@upx.com.br> a > écrit : > > Thanks for the reply. > > Perhaps is the case of contacting the maintainer of Linux Bond module and see > if there is room for this feature to be implement anytime. OVS is great in > the coming future, but Bond module is still something very handy that > simplify the things a lot. > > Thanks > Fernando > > Em 27/06/2016 03:00, Edward Haas escreveu: >> >> >> On Sun, Jun 26, 2016 at 4:37 PM, Yevgeny Zaspitsky < >> <mailto:yzasp...@redhat.com>yzasp...@redhat.com >> <mailto:yzasp...@redhat.com>> wrote: >> Dan, Edy, >> >> Could you guys answer this? >> >> IIUC, the requirements are: >> stream the traffic of few VLANs(network roles) through a single bond >> be able to bind a VLAN to a bond slave with an option of fallback >> have redundancy >> assign different QoS to every VLAN (my addition) >> I guess this is a new RFC that we do not support currently, but would we be >> able to provide in any future? >> >> -- Forwarded message -- >> From: Fernando Frediani < >> <mailto:fernando.fredi...@upx.com.br>fernando.fredi...@upx.com.br >> <mailto:fernando.fredi...@upx.com.br>> >> Date: Sat, Jun 25, 2016 at 11:17 PM >> Subject: [ovirt-users] Network redundancy with Manual balancing per VLAN >> To: users@ovirt.org <mailto:users@ovirt.org> >> >> >> Hello, >> >> In VMware it is possible to bond two network interfaces and for each >> Portgroup (equivalent to a VLAN) is possible to tell which of the physical >> interfaces underneath it you wish the traffic to flow primarily and which >> stays as secondary(bond mode=1 equivalent). So for certain VLANs >> (Management, Live Migration, etc) is possible to force traffic flow via one >> physical NIC of the bond and for other VLANs (Virtual Machine's traffic) >> outs via the other NIC with failover to each other should a cable or switch >> fails. >> >> This is specially good for better utilize the fewer NICs available and still >> have redundancy. >> >> In oVirt it is also possible to have bonds, but would it still be possible >> to do that same and favor the traffic per VLAN basis ? I guess it is >> something related to Linux Bond module but perhaps someone has done this >> already. >> >> >> >> Thanks >> >> Fernando >> >> ___ >> Users mailing list >> Users@ovirt.org <mailto:Users@ovirt.org> >> http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users >> <http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users> >> >> >> Hello Fernando, >> >> As you mentioned, oVirt is using the Linux Bond and the solution you are >> looking for is not supported. >> The oVirt way to handle this is by applying QoS on the networks, providing >> the guaranteed rates for each and utilizing the bond for throughput beyond >> the one link limit. >> >> With the introduction of OVS as an alternative networking infrastructure for >> the hosts, you could create a hook that implements some special >> functionality, but ovs is not in yet. >> >> Thanks, >> Edy. >> >> > > ___ > Users mailing list > Users@ovirt.org > http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users ___ Users mailing list Users@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Re: [ovirt-users] Network redundancy with Manual balancing per VLAN
Thanks for the reply.
Perhaps is the case of contacting the maintainer of Linux Bond module
and see if there is room for this feature to be implement anytime. OVS
is great in the coming future, but Bond module is still something very
handy that simplify the things a lot.
Thanks
Fernando
Em 27/06/2016 03:00, Edward Haas escreveu:
On Sun, Jun 26, 2016 at 4:37 PM, Yevgeny Zaspitsky
<yzasp...@redhat.com <mailto:yzasp...@redhat.com>> wrote:
Dan, Edy,
Could you guys answer this?
IIUC, the requirements are:
* stream the traffic of few VLANs(network roles) through a
single bond
* be able to bind a VLAN to a bond slave with an option of fallback
* have redundancy
* assign different QoS to every VLAN (my addition)
I guess this is a new RFC that we do not support currently, but
would we be able to provide in any future?
-- Forwarded message --
From: *Fernando Frediani* <fernando.fredi...@upx.com.br
<mailto:fernando.fredi...@upx.com.br>>
Date: Sat, Jun 25, 2016 at 11:17 PM
Subject: [ovirt-users] Network redundancy with Manual balancing
per VLAN
To: users@ovirt.org <mailto:users@ovirt.org>
Hello,
In VMware it is possible to bond two network interfaces and for
each Portgroup (equivalent to a VLAN) is possible to tell which of
the physical interfaces underneath it you wish the traffic to flow
primarily and which stays as secondary(bond mode=1 equivalent). So
for certain VLANs (Management, Live Migration, etc) is possible to
force traffic flow via one physical NIC of the bond and for other
VLANs (Virtual Machine's traffic) outs via the other NIC with
failover to each other should a cable or switch fails.
This is specially good for better utilize the fewer NICs available
and still have redundancy.
In oVirt it is also possible to have bonds, but would it still be
possible to do that same and favor the traffic per VLAN basis ? I
guess it is something related to Linux Bond module but perhaps
someone has done this already.
Thanks
Fernando
___
Users mailing list
Users@ovirt.org <mailto:Users@ovirt.org>
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Hello Fernando,
As you mentioned, oVirt is using the Linux Bond and the solution you
are looking for is not supported.
The oVirt way to handle this is by applying QoS on the networks,
providing the guaranteed rates for each and utilizing the bond for
throughput beyond the one link limit.
With the introduction of OVS as an alternative networking
infrastructure for the hosts, you could create a hook that implements
some special functionality, but ovs is not in yet.
Thanks,
Edy.
___
Users mailing list
Users@ovirt.org
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Re: [ovirt-users] Network redundancy with Manual balancing per VLAN
On Sun, Jun 26, 2016 at 4:37 PM, Yevgeny Zaspitsky <yzasp...@redhat.com> wrote: > Dan, Edy, > > Could you guys answer this? > > IIUC, the requirements are: > >- stream the traffic of few VLANs(network roles) through a single bond >- be able to bind a VLAN to a bond slave with an option of fallback >- have redundancy >- assign different QoS to every VLAN (my addition) > > I guess this is a new RFC that we do not support currently, but would we > be able to provide in any future? > > -- Forwarded message -- > From: Fernando Frediani <fernando.fredi...@upx.com.br> > Date: Sat, Jun 25, 2016 at 11:17 PM > Subject: [ovirt-users] Network redundancy with Manual balancing per VLAN > To: users@ovirt.org > > > Hello, > > In VMware it is possible to bond two network interfaces and for each > Portgroup (equivalent to a VLAN) is possible to tell which of the physical > interfaces underneath it you wish the traffic to flow primarily and which > stays as secondary(bond mode=1 equivalent). So for certain VLANs > (Management, Live Migration, etc) is possible to force traffic flow via one > physical NIC of the bond and for other VLANs (Virtual Machine's traffic) > outs via the other NIC with failover to each other should a cable or switch > fails. > > This is specially good for better utilize the fewer NICs available and > still have redundancy. > > In oVirt it is also possible to have bonds, but would it still be possible > to do that same and favor the traffic per VLAN basis ? I guess it is > something related to Linux Bond module but perhaps someone has done this > already. > > > Thanks > > Fernando > > ___ > Users mailing list > Users@ovirt.org > http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users > > Hello Fernando, As you mentioned, oVirt is using the Linux Bond and the solution you are looking for is not supported. The oVirt way to handle this is by applying QoS on the networks, providing the guaranteed rates for each and utilizing the bond for throughput beyond the one link limit. With the introduction of OVS as an alternative networking infrastructure for the hosts, you could create a hook that implements some special functionality, but ovs is not in yet. Thanks, Edy. ___ Users mailing list Users@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Re: [ovirt-users] Network redundancy with Manual balancing per VLAN
Dan, Edy, Could you guys answer this? IIUC, the requirements are: - stream the traffic of few VLANs(network roles) through a single bond - be able to bind a VLAN to a bond slave with an option of fallback - have redundancy - assign different QoS to every VLAN (my addition) I guess this is a new RFC that we do not support currently, but would we be able to provide in any future? -- Forwarded message -- From: Fernando Frediani <fernando.fredi...@upx.com.br> Date: Sat, Jun 25, 2016 at 11:17 PM Subject: [ovirt-users] Network redundancy with Manual balancing per VLAN To: users@ovirt.org Hello, In VMware it is possible to bond two network interfaces and for each Portgroup (equivalent to a VLAN) is possible to tell which of the physical interfaces underneath it you wish the traffic to flow primarily and which stays as secondary(bond mode=1 equivalent). So for certain VLANs (Management, Live Migration, etc) is possible to force traffic flow via one physical NIC of the bond and for other VLANs (Virtual Machine's traffic) outs via the other NIC with failover to each other should a cable or switch fails. This is specially good for better utilize the fewer NICs available and still have redundancy. In oVirt it is also possible to have bonds, but would it still be possible to do that same and favor the traffic per VLAN basis ? I guess it is something related to Linux Bond module but perhaps someone has done this already. Thanks Fernando ___ Users mailing list Users@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users ___ Users mailing list Users@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
[ovirt-users] Network redundancy with Manual balancing per VLAN
Hello, In VMware it is possible to bond two network interfaces and for each Portgroup (equivalent to a VLAN) is possible to tell which of the physical interfaces underneath it you wish the traffic to flow primarily and which stays as secondary(bond mode=1 equivalent). So for certain VLANs (Management, Live Migration, etc) is possible to force traffic flow via one physical NIC of the bond and for other VLANs (Virtual Machine's traffic) outs via the other NIC with failover to each other should a cable or switch fails. This is specially good for better utilize the fewer NICs available and still have redundancy. In oVirt it is also possible to have bonds, but would it still be possible to do that same and favor the traffic per VLAN basis ? I guess it is something related to Linux Bond module but perhaps someone has done this already. Thanks Fernando ___ Users mailing list Users@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
