Re: [Users] unable to start vm in 3.3 and f19 with gluster
On 09/25/2013 02:10 AM, Gianluca Cecchi wrote: Hello, I'm testing GlusterFS on 3.3 with fedora 19 systems. One engine (ovirt) + 2 nodes (ovnode01 and ovnode02) Successfully created gluster volume composed by two bricks (one for each vdsm node) distributed replicated Suggestion: If page http://www.ovirt.org/Features/GlusterFS_Storage_Domain is the reference, perhaps it would be better to explicitly specify that one has to start the created volume before going to add a storage domain based on the created volume. Not knowing Gluster could lead to think that the start phase is responsibility of storage domain creation itself ... its a wiki - please edit/fix it ;) ___ Users mailing list Users@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Re: [Users] unable to start vm in 3.3 and f19 with gluster
So it seems the probelm is file=gluster://ovnode01/gv01/20042e7b-0929-48ca-ad40-2a2aa22f0689/images/d004045e-620b-4d90-8a7f-6c6d26393a08/dff09892-bc60-4de5-85c0-2a1fa215a161,if=none,id=drive-virtio-disk0,format=raw,serial=d004045e-620b-4d90-8a7f-6c6d26393a08,cache=none,werror=stop,rerror=stop,aio=threads: Gluster connection failed for server=ovnode01 port=0 volume=gv01 image=20042e7b-0929-48ca-ad40-2a2aa22f0689/images/d004045e-620b-4d90-8a7f-6c6d26393a08/dff09892-bc60-4de5-85c0-2a1fa215a161 transport=tcp qemu-system-x86_64: -drive file=gluster://ovnode01/gv01/20042e7b-0929-48ca-ad40-2a2aa22f0689/images/d004045e-620b-4d90-8a7f-6c6d26393a08/dff09892-bc60-4de5-85c0-2a1fa215a161,if=none,id=drive-virtio-disk0,format=raw,serial=d004045e-620b-4d90-8a7f-6c6d26393a08,cache=none,werror=stop,rerror=stop,aio=threads: could not open disk image it is the same in qemu.log of both hosts On the other one I have: 2013-09-25 05:42:35.454+: starting up LC_ALL=C PATH=/usr/local/sbin:/usr/local/bin:/usr/sbin:/usr/bin QEMU_AUDIO_DRV=spice /usr/bin/qemu-kvm -name C6 -S -machine pc-1.0,accel=kvm,usb=off -cpu Nehalem -m 2048 -smp 1,sockets=1,cores=1,threads=1 -uuid 409c5dbe-5e70-40de-bf73-46ef484ea2d7 -smbios type=1,manufacturer=oVirt,product=oVirt Node,version=19-3,serial=421FAF48-83D1-08DC-F2ED-F2894F8BC56D,uuid=409c5dbe-5e70-40de-bf73-46ef484ea2d7 -no-user-config -nodefaults -chardev socket,id=charmonitor,path=/var/lib/libvirt/qemu/C6.monitor,server,nowait -mon chardev=charmonitor,id=monitor,mode=control -rtc base=2013-09-25T05:42:35,driftfix=slew -no-shutdown -device piix3-usb-uhci,id=usb,bus=pci.0,addr=0x1.0x2 -device virtio-scsi-pci,id=scsi0,bus=pci.0,addr=0x4 -device virtio-serial-pci,id=virtio-serial0,bus=pci.0,addr=0x5 -drive if=none,id=drive-ide0-1-0,readonly=on,format=raw,serial= -device ide-cd,bus=ide.1,unit=0,drive=drive-ide0-1-0,id=ide0-1-0 -drive file=gluster://ovnode01/gv01/20042e7b-0929-48ca-ad40-2a2aa22f0689/images/d004045e-620b-4d90-8a7f-6c6d26393a08/dff09892-bc60-4de5-85c0-2a1fa215a161,if=none,id=drive-virtio-disk0,format=raw,serial=d004045e-620b-4d90-8a7f-6c6d26393a08,cache=none,werror=stop,rerror=stop,aio=threads -device virtio-blk-pci,scsi=off,bus=pci.0,addr=0x6,drive=drive-virtio-disk0,id=virtio-disk0,bootindex=1 -netdev tap,fd=27,id=hostnet0,vhost=on,vhostfd=28 -device virtio-net-pci,netdev=hostnet0,id=net0,mac=00:1a:4a:bb:9f:10,bus=pci.0,addr=0x3 -chardev socket,id=charchannel0,path=/var/lib/libvirt/qemu/channels/409c5dbe-5e70-40de-bf73-46ef484ea2d7.com.redhat.rhevm.vdsm,server,nowait -device virtserialport,bus=virtio-serial0.0,nr=1,chardev=charchannel0,id=channel0,name=com.redhat.rhevm.vdsm -chardev socket,id=charchannel1,path=/var/lib/libvirt/qemu/channels/409c5dbe-5e70-40de-bf73-46ef484ea2d7.org.qemu.guest_agent.0,server,nowait -device virtserialport,bus=virtio-serial0.0,nr=2,chardev=charchannel1,id=channel1,name=org.qemu.guest_agent.0 -chardev spicevmc,id=charchannel2,name=vdagent -device virtserialport,bus=virtio-serial0.0,nr=3,chardev=charchannel2,id=channel2,name=com.redhat.spice.0 -spice tls-port=5900,addr=0,x509-dir=/etc/pki/vdsm/libvirt-spice,tls-channel=main,tls-channel=display,tls-channel=inputs,tls-channel=cursor,tls-channel=playback,tls-channel=record,tls-channel=smartcard,tls-channel=usbredir,seamless-migration=on -k en-us -vga qxl -global qxl-vga.ram_size=67108864 -global qxl-vga.vram_size=67108864 -device virtio-balloon-pci,id=balloon0,bus=pci.0,addr=0x7 qemu-system-x86_64: -drive file=gluster://ovnode01/gv01/20042e7b-0929-48ca-ad40-2a2aa22f0689/images/d004045e-620b-4d90-8a7f-6c6d26393a08/dff09892-bc60-4de5-85c0-2a1fa215a161,if=none,id=drive-virtio-disk0,format=raw,serial=d004045e-620b-4d90-8a7f-6c6d26393a08,cache=none,werror=stop,rerror=stop,aio=threads: Gluster connection failed for server=ovnode01 port=0 volume=gv01 image=20042e7b-0929-48ca-ad40-2a2aa22f0689/images/d004045e-620b-4d90-8a7f-6c6d26393a08/dff09892-bc60-4de5-85c0-2a1fa215a161 transport=tcp qemu-system-x86_64: -drive file=gluster://ovnode01/gv01/20042e7b-0929-48ca-ad40-2a2aa22f0689/images/d004045e-620b-4d90-8a7f-6c6d26393a08/dff09892-bc60-4de5-85c0-2a1fa215a161,if=none,id=drive-virtio-disk0,format=raw,serial=d004045e-620b-4d90-8a7f-6c6d26393a08,cache=none,werror=stop,rerror=stop,aio=threads: could not open disk image gluster://ovnode01/gv01/20042e7b-0929-48ca-ad40-2a2aa22f0689/images/d004045e-620b-4d90-8a7f-6c6d26393a08/dff09892-bc60-4de5-85c0-2a1fa215a161: No data available 2013-09-25 05:42:38.620+: shutting down Currently iptables as setup by install is this (I checked to set up iptables from the gui when I added the host) Do I have to add anything for gluster? [root@ovnode01 qemu]# iptables -L -n Chain INPUT (policy ACCEPT) target prot opt source destination ACCEPT all -- 0.0.0.0/00.0.0.0/0state RELATED,ESTABLISHED ACCEPT all -- 0.0.0.0/00.0.0.0/0 ACCEPT tcp -- 0.0.0.0/00.0.0.0/0tcp dpt:54321 ACCEPT tcp
Re: [Users] unable to start vm in 3.3 and f19 with gluster
On 09/25/2013 11:36 AM, Gianluca Cecchi wrote: qemu-system-x86_64: -drive file=gluster://ovnode01/gv01/20042e7b-0929-48ca-ad40-2a2aa22f0689/images/d004045e-620b-4d90-8a7f-6c6d26393a08/dff09892-bc60-4de5-85c0-2a1fa215a161,if=none,id=drive-virtio-disk0,format=raw,serial=d004045e-620b-4d90-8a7f-6c6d26393a08,cache=none,werror=stop,rerror=stop,aio=threads: Gluster connection failed for server=ovnode01 port=0 volume=gv01 image=20042e7b-0929-48ca-ad40-2a2aa22f0689/images/d004045e-620b-4d90-8a7f-6c6d26393a08/dff09892-bc60-4de5-85c0-2a1fa215a161 transport=tcp qemu-system-x86_64: -drive file=gluster://ovnode01/gv01/20042e7b-0929-48ca-ad40-2a2aa22f0689/images/d004045e-620b-4d90-8a7f-6c6d26393a08/dff09892-bc60-4de5-85c0-2a1fa215a161,if=none,id=drive-virtio-disk0,format=raw,serial=d004045e-620b-4d90-8a7f-6c6d26393a08,cache=none,werror=stop,rerror=stop,aio=threads: could not open disk image gluster://ovnode01/gv01/20042e7b-0929-48ca-ad40-2a2aa22f0689/images/d004045e-620b-4d90-8a7f-6c6d26393a08/dff09892-bc60-4de5-85c0-2a1fa215a161: No data available 2013-09-25 05:42:32.291+: shutting down Have the following configuration changes been done? 1) gluster volume set volname server.allow-insecure on 2) Edit /etc/glusterfs/glusterd.vol on all gluster nodes to contain this line: option rpc-auth-allow-insecure on Post 2), restarting glusterd would be necessary. Regards, Vijay ___ Users mailing list Users@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Re: [Users] unable to start vm in 3.3 and f19 with gluster
On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 8:11 AM, Vijay Bellur wrote: Have the following configuration changes been done? 1) gluster volume set volname server.allow-insecure on 2) Edit /etc/glusterfs/glusterd.vol on all gluster nodes to contain this line: option rpc-auth-allow-insecure on Post 2), restarting glusterd would be necessary. Regards, Vijay No, because I didn't find find this kind of info anywhere... ;-) Done on both hosts (step 1 only one time) and I see that the gui detects the change in volume setting. Now the VM can start (I see the qemu process on ovnode02) but it seems to remain in hourglass state icon. After 5 minutes it still remains in executing phase in tasks Eventually I'm going to restart the nodes completely ___ Users mailing list Users@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Re: [Users] unable to start vm in 3.3 and f19 with gluster
On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 8:02 AM, Itamar Heim wrote: Suggestion: If page http://www.ovirt.org/Features/GlusterFS_Storage_Domain is the reference, perhaps it would be better to explicitly specify that one has to start the created volume before going to add a storage domain based on the created volume. Not knowing Gluster could lead to think that the start phase is responsibility of storage domain creation itself ... its a wiki - please edit/fix it ;) I was in doubt because it is not explictly set as wiki but more as infra ... I'll do ___ Users mailing list Users@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Re: [Users] unable to start vm in 3.3 and f19 with gluster
On 09/25/2013 11:51 AM, Gianluca Cecchi wrote: On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 8:11 AM, Vijay Bellur wrote: Have the following configuration changes been done? 1) gluster volume set volname server.allow-insecure on 2) Edit /etc/glusterfs/glusterd.vol on all gluster nodes to contain this line: option rpc-auth-allow-insecure on Post 2), restarting glusterd would be necessary. Regards, Vijay No, because I didn't find find this kind of info anywhere... ;-) The feature page wiki does provide this information but it gets missed in the details. Should we highlight it more? Done on both hosts (step 1 only one time) and I see that the gui detects the change in volume setting. Now the VM can start (I see the qemu process on ovnode02) but it seems to remain in hourglass state icon. After 5 minutes it still remains in executing phase in tasks Let us know how this goes. -Vijay ___ Users mailing list Users@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Re: [Users] vdsm Domain monitor error
if the domain no longer exists than the problem is not in the host at all.
your problem is that you have db entries and when you try to remove them
a command is sent to the vdsm (since engine has no idea you removed the
domain) and you will fail to remove it since vdsm is sending an error.
what you need to do is destroy the domain in the UI (domains tab -
select the domain - right click - destroy). this should clean all the
db entries related to that domain.
On 09/24/2013 09:27 PM, Eduardo Ramos wrote:
I think I found it, but I don't know how to remove:
/sbin/lvm vgs --config devices { preferred_names =
[\^/dev/mapper/\] ignore_suspended_devices=1 write_cache_state=0
disable_after_error_count=3 filter = [
\a%36000eb396eb9c0540033|3600508b1001c80dabd7195030a341559%\,
\r%.*%\ ] } global { locking_type=1 prioritise_write_locks=1
wait_for_locks=1 } backup { retain_min = 50 retain_days = 0 }
--noheadings --units b --nosuffix --separator '|' -o tags
In the return, there it is:
MDT_POOL_DOMAINS=*0226b818-59a6-41bc-8590-91f520aa7859:Active*44c332da29-ba9f-4c94-8fa9-346bb8e04e2a:Active4451eb6183-157d-4015-ae0f-1c7ffb1731c0:Active440e0be898-6e04-4469-bb32-91f3cf8146d1:Active,MDT__SHA_CKSUM=0ccf56122a8384461c8da7b0eda19e9bdcbd23bf
Any idea to remove it?
On 09/24/2013 02:14 PM, Eduardo Ramos wrote:
This storage domains don't exist anymore. There is an entry in
postgres with:
Domain VMExport was forcibly removed by admin@internal
It was a NFS Export domain.
Is there any chance it is causing problem with iscsi data domain
operations? Now I can create disks and VMs, but I can't remove them.
I tried export a VM, and the engine.log returned me this:
2013-09-24 14:03:05,180 ERROR
[org.ovirt.engine.core.vdsbroker.vdsbroker.BrokerCommandBase]
(pool-3-thread-33) [547e3abf] Failed in MoveImageGroupVDS method
2013-09-24 14:03:05,182 ERROR
[org.ovirt.engine.core.vdsbroker.vdsbroker.BrokerCommandBase]
(pool-3-thread-33) [547e3abf] Error code MoveImageError and error
message IRSGenericException: IRSErrorException: Failed to
MoveImageGroupVDS, error = Error moving image:
('spUUID=9dbc7bb1-c460-4202-8f10-862d2ed3ed9a,
srcDomUUID=c332da29-ba9f-4c94-8fa9-346bb8e04e2a,
dstDomUUID=51eb6183-157d-4015-ae0f-1c7ffb1731c0,
imgUUID=483d8af2-beb2-45cc-b73e-4597e31a6fc0, vmUUID=, op=1,
force=false, postZero=false force=false',)
2013-09-24 14:03:05,184 ERROR
[org.ovirt.engine.core.vdsbroker.irsbroker.IrsBrokerCommand]
(pool-3-thread-33) [547e3abf] IrsBroker::Failed::MoveImageGroupVDS
due to: IRSErrorException: IRSGenericException: IRSErrorException:
Failed to MoveImageGroupVDS, error = Error moving image:
('spUUID=9dbc7bb1-c460-4202-8f10-862d2ed3ed9a,
srcDomUUID=c332da29-ba9f-4c94-8fa9-346bb8e04e2a,
dstDomUUID=51eb6183-157d-4015-ae0f-1c7ffb1731c0,
imgUUID=483d8af2-beb2-45cc-b73e-4597e31a6fc0, vmUUID=, op=1,
force=false, postZero=false force=false',)
On 09/24/2013 01:09 PM, Dafna Ron wrote:
vdsm cannot find your storage.
check your storage and network connection to it.
On 09/24/2013 03:31 PM, Eduardo Ramos wrote:
Hi all!
I'm getting a strange error in on my SPM:
Message from syslogd@darwin at Sep 24 11:19:58 ...
�11vdsm Storage.DomainMonitorThread ERROR Error while collecting
domain 0226b818-59a6-41bc-8590-91f520aa7859 monitoring
information#012Traceback (most recent call last):#012 File
/usr/share/vdsm/storage/domainMonitor.py, line 182, in
_monitorDomain#012 self.domain = sdCache.produce(self.sdUUID)#012
File /usr/share/vdsm/storage/sdc.py, line 97, in produce#012
domain.getRealDomain()#012 File /usr/share/vdsm/storage/sdc.py,
line 52, in getRealDomain#012 return
self._cache._realProduce(self._sdUUID)#012 File
/usr/share/vdsm/storage/sdc.py, line 121, in _realProduce#012
domain = self._findDomain(sdUUID)#012 File
/usr/share/vdsm/storage/sdc.py, line 152, in _findDomain#012
raise
se.StorageDomainDoesNotExist(sdUUID)#012StorageDomainDoesNotExist:
Storage domain does not exist:
(u'0226b818-59a6-41bc-8590-91f520aa7859',)
I also can not remove disks. When I try,immediatly appears on the
'Events' log of webadmin:
*Data Center is being initialized, please wait for initialization
to complete.*
*User eduardo.ramos failed to initiate removing of disk
012.167_teste_InfoDoc_Disk1 from domain VMs.*
Could someone help me?
Thanks
___
Users mailing list
Users@ovirt.org
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
___
Users mailing list
Users@ovirt.org
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
--
Dafna Ron
___
Users mailing list
Users@ovirt.org
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Re: [Users] Migration issues with ovirt 3.3
No, it doesn't succeed neither. I've also noticed that in the Gluster Swift secction it appears to me everything as Not installed, except the memcached that appears as Down, could this has something to do with all these? The private chat was my bad I think, I've only answered to you in some point, sorry! Thanks! 2013/9/25 Dan Kenigsberg dan...@redhat.com On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 10:40:30AM -0300, emi...@gmail.com wrote: I've created a new debian VM. I've restarted the vdsm on the source and destination host and after try the migration now I received the following message: Migration failed due to Error: Fatal error during migration (VM: debian-test2, Source: ovirt1, Destination: ovirt2). Do you think that with a clean instalation of the host could this be solved? No. We have a real bug on re-connecting to VMs on startup. But why are we in a private chat? Please report it as a reply to the mailing list thread. But let me verify: if you start a VM and then migrate (no vdsm restart), does migration succede? Dan. -- *Emiliano Tortorella* +598 98941176 emi...@gmail.com ___ Users mailing list Users@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Re: [Users] Glance with oVirt
On 09/24/2013 08:24 PM, Itamar Heim wrote: On 09/24/2013 06:06 PM, Jason Brooks wrote: On Tue, 2013-09-24 at 16:15 +0200, Riccardo Brunetti wrote: Dear ovirt users. I'm trying to setup an oVirt 3.3 installation using an already existing OpenStack glance service as an external provider. When I define the external provider, I put: Openstack Image as Type the glance service endpoint as URL (ie. http://xx.xx.xx.xx:9292) I used the openstack public url. check Requires Authentication put the administrator user/password/tenant in the following fields. Unfortunately the connection test always fails and the glance provider doesn't work in ovirt. You also need to run this from the command line (of your engine): engine-config --set KeystoneAuthUrl=http://host.fqdn:35357 maybe open a bug on missing a warning keystone is not configured when trying to use glance/neutron with authentication? And then restart the ovirt-engine service. Jason In the engine.log I can see: 2013-09-24 15:57:30,665 INFO [org.ovirt.engine.core.bll.provider.TestProviderConnectivityCommand] (ajp--127.0.0.1-8702-3) Running command: TestProviderConnectivityCommand internal: false. Entities affected : ID: aaa0----123456789aaa Type: System 2013-09-24 15:57:30,671 ERROR [org.ovirt.engine.core.bll.provider.TestProviderConnectivityCommand] (ajp--127.0.0.1-8702-3) Command org.ovirt.engine.core.bll.provider.TestProviderConnectivityCommand throw Vdc Bll exception. With error message VdcBLLException: (Failed with VDSM error PROVIDER_FAILURE and code 5050) 2013-09-24 15:57:30,674 ERROR [org.ovirt.engine.core.bll.provider.TestProviderConnectivityCommand] (ajp--127.0.0.1-8702-3) Transaction rolled-back for command: org.ovirt.engine.core.bll.provider.TestProviderConnectivityCommand. The glance URL is reachable from the oVirt engine host, but looking with tcpdump on the glance service I noticed that no connections come up --- when I use requires authentication --- a connection happens if --- I do not use requires authentication --- (even if the test fails ultimately) My OS is CentOS-6.4 and my packages are the following: [root@rhvmgr03 ovirt-engine]# rpm -qa | grep ovi ovirt-host-deploy-1.1.1-1.el6.noarch ovirt-log-collector-3.3.0-1.el6.noarch ovirt-engine-cli-3.3.0.4-1.el6.noarch ovirt-engine-webadmin-portal-3.3.0-4.el6.noarch ovirt-engine-tools-3.3.0-4.el6.noarch ovirt-release-el6-8-1.noarch ovirt-engine-sdk-python-3.3.0.6-1.el6.noarch ovirt-iso-uploader-3.3.0-1.el6.noarch ovirt-host-deploy-java-1.1.1-1.el6.noarch ovirt-engine-userportal-3.3.0-4.el6.noarch ovirt-engine-backend-3.3.0-4.el6.noarch ovirt-engine-setup-3.3.0-4.el6.noarch ovirt-engine-3.3.0-4.el6.noarch ovirt-image-uploader-3.3.0-1.el6.noarch ovirt-engine-lib-3.3.0-4.el6.noarch ovirt-engine-restapi-3.3.0-4.el6.noarch ovirt-engine-dbscripts-3.3.0-4.el6.noarch Do you have some suggestion to debug or solve this issue? Thanks a lot. Best Regards R. Brunetti ___ Users mailing list Users@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users ___ Users mailing list Users@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users Dear all. Unfortunately I did manage to work out only the first step of the procedure. I can successfully define the glance external provider and from the storage tab I can list the images available in glance, but when I try to import an image (ie. a Fedora19 qcow2 image which is working inside OpenStack) the disk is stuck in Illegal state and in the logs (ovirt-engine) I see messages like: 2013-09-25 16:01:37,740 INFO [org.ovirt.engine.core.bll.AsyncTaskManager] (DefaultQuartzScheduler_Worker-71) Polling and updating Async Tasks: 2 tasks, 2 tasks to poll now 2013-09-25 16:01:37,775 INFO [org.ovirt.engine.core.bll.SPMAsyncTask] (DefaultQuartzScheduler_Worker-71) BaseAsyncTask::OnTaskEndSuccess: Task 32982d1d-543c-4015-8b02-4b0f3f7ac45a (Parent Command ImportRepoImage, Parameters Type org.ovirt.engine.core.common.asynctasks.AsyncTaskParameters) ended successfully. 2013-09-25 16:01:37,776 INFO [org.ovirt.engine.core.bll.CommandAsyncTask] (DefaultQuartzScheduler_Worker-71) CommandAsyncTask::EndActionIfNecessary: All tasks of command 3a9eb626-2ea8-445f-8286-fb0e7c464b3d has ended - executing EndAction 2013-09-25 16:01:37,777 INFO [org.ovirt.engine.core.bll.CommandAsyncTask] (DefaultQuartzScheduler_Worker-71) CommandAsyncTask::EndAction: Ending action for 1 tasks (command ID: 3a9eb626-2ea8-445f-8286-fb0e7c464b3d): calling EndAction . 2013-09-25 16:01:37,778 INFO [org.ovirt.engine.core.bll.SPMAsyncTask] (DefaultQuartzScheduler_Worker-71) BaseAsyncTask::OnTaskEndSuccess: Task e8057bc2-e99f-4db8-ba1d-97b84a1f3db0 (Parent Command ImportRepoImage, Parameters Type org.ovirt.engine.core.common.asynctasks.AsyncTaskParameters) ended successfully. 2013-09-25 16:01:37,778 INFO
[Users] Ovirt engine high availability
Hello, Was wondering if anyone can shed a light on this subject as I could not find any documentation specific to this. I am currently running an ovirt 3.2 cluster with 5 hosts with local storage. I have a dedicated box running ovirt engine. I would like to have the ability to run an additional box with ovirt engine on it for high availability of the portal. I realize this would most likely require I run a separate instance of postgres for the engine, however I was wondering if this is something that is officially supported? Thanks! Doug Bishop Sr. Systems Engineer dbis...@controlscan.com Controlscan, Inc. 11475 Great Oaks Way, Suite 300 Alpharetta, GA 30022 www.controlscan.com NOTICE: This e-mail message, including any attachments, is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) or entity and may contain sensitive information that is confidential, proprietary, privileged or otherwise protected by law. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure, distribution, copying or other use of, or taking of any action in reliance upon, is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of this message. This e-mail is and any response to it will be unencrypted and, therefore, potentially unsecure. The recipient should check this email and any attachments for the presence of viruses/malware according to security best practices. Thank you. ___ Users mailing list Users@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Re: [Users] Ovirt engine high availability
There are plenty of options: 1. Run the engine as a VM under a local libvirt, and cluster the libvirt VM as a protected service using RHCS (well tested and documented) 2. Use the self hosted engine (recently announced, coming up tech) 3. Use any other clustering technology you like best, an engine VM with a centrally backed storage is very easy to start on any capable host On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 10:06 AM, Doug Bishop dbis...@controlscan.comwrote: Hello, Was wondering if anyone can shed a light on this subject as I could not find any documentation specific to this. I am currently running an ovirt 3.2 cluster with 5 hosts with local storage. I have a dedicated box running ovirt engine. I would like to have the ability to run an additional box with ovirt engine on it for high availability of the portal. I realize this would most likely require I run a separate instance of postgres for the engine, however I was wondering if this is something that is officially supported? Thanks! Doug Bishop Sr. Systems Engineer dbis...@controlscan.com Controlscan, Inc. 11475 Great Oaks Way, Suite 300 Alpharetta, GA 30022 www.controlscan.com NOTICE: This e-mail message, including any attachments, is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) or entity and may contain sensitive information that is confidential, proprietary, privileged or otherwise protected by law. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure, distribution, copying or other use of, or taking of any action in reliance upon, is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of this message. This e-mail is and any response to it will be unencrypted and, therefore, potentially unsecure. The recipient should check this email and any attachments for the presence of viruses/malware according to security best practices. Thank you. ___ Users mailing list Users@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users ___ Users mailing list Users@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Re: [Users] Ovirt engine high availability
Those are good options, however since I am not running centralized storage, all my hosts are in their own data center with local storage options only. Thats why I have two standalone machines to run ovirt on. Im guessing this is not recommended? If not is there away to allow local storage and nfs based storage in a data center? Doug Bishop Sr. Systems Engineer Cell: 678-848-6658 dbis...@controlscan.com Controlscan, Inc. 11475 Great Oaks Way, Suite 300 Alpharetta, GA 30022 www.controlscan.com From: Dan Yasny [dya...@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, September 25, 2013 12:14 PM To: Doug Bishop Cc: users@ovirt.org Subject: Re: [Users] Ovirt engine high availability There are plenty of options: 1. Run the engine as a VM under a local libvirt, and cluster the libvirt VM as a protected service using RHCS (well tested and documented) 2. Use the self hosted engine (recently announced, coming up tech) 3. Use any other clustering technology you like best, an engine VM with a centrally backed storage is very easy to start on any capable host On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 10:06 AM, Doug Bishop dbis...@controlscan.commailto:dbis...@controlscan.com wrote: Hello, Was wondering if anyone can shed a light on this subject as I could not find any documentation specific to this. I am currently running an ovirt 3.2 cluster with 5 hosts with local storage. I have a dedicated box running ovirt engine. I would like to have the ability to run an additional box with ovirt engine on it for high availability of the portal. I realize this would most likely require I run a separate instance of postgres for the engine, however I was wondering if this is something that is officially supported? Thanks! Doug Bishop Sr. Systems Engineer dbis...@controlscan.commailto:dbis...@controlscan.com Controlscan, Inc. 11475 Great Oaks Way, Suite 300 Alpharetta, GA 30022 www.controlscan.comhttp://www.controlscan.com NOTICE: This e-mail message, including any attachments, is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) or entity and may contain sensitive information that is confidential, proprietary, privileged or otherwise protected by law. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure, distribution, copying or other use of, or taking of any action in reliance upon, is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of this message. This e-mail is and any response to it will be unencrypted and, therefore, potentially unsecure. The recipient should check this email and any attachments for the presence of viruses/malware according to security best practices. Thank you. ___ Users mailing list Users@ovirt.orgmailto:Users@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users NOTICE: This e-mail message, including any attachments, is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) or entity and may contain sensitive information that is confidential, proprietary, privileged or otherwise protected by law. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure, distribution, copying or other use of, or taking of any action in reliance upon, is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of this message. This e-mail is and any response to it will be unencrypted and, therefore, potentially unsecure. The recipient should check this email and any attachments for the presence of viruses/malware according to security best practices. Thank you. ___ Users mailing list Users@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Re: [Users] Ovirt engine high availability
Yeah, that was along the lines of what I was thinking. Just wanted to make sure there wasnt an official way to do it as well. Thanks! Doug Bishop Sr. Systems Engineer Cell: 678-848-6658 dbis...@controlscan.com Controlscan, Inc. 11475 Great Oaks Way, Suite 300 Alpharetta, GA 30022 www.controlscan.com From: Dan Yasny [dya...@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, September 25, 2013 4:31 PM To: Doug Bishop Cc: users@ovirt.org Subject: Re: [Users] Ovirt engine high availability The classic answer here would be to use DRBD to replicate the engine storage to a standby host's local storage. On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 2:25 PM, Doug Bishop dbis...@controlscan.commailto:dbis...@controlscan.com wrote: Those are good options, however since I am not running centralized storage, all my hosts are in their own data center with local storage options only. Thats why I have two standalone machines to run ovirt on. Im guessing this is not recommended? If not is there away to allow local storage and nfs based storage in a data center? Doug Bishop Sr. Systems Engineer Cell: 678-848-6658 dbis...@controlscan.commailto:dbis...@controlscan.com Controlscan, Inc. 11475 Great Oaks Way, Suite 300 Alpharetta, GA 30022 www.controlscan.comhttp://www.controlscan.com From: Dan Yasny [dya...@gmail.commailto:dya...@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, September 25, 2013tel:2013 12:14 PM To: Doug Bishop Cc: users@ovirt.orgmailto:users@ovirt.org Subject: Re: [Users] Ovirt engine high availability There are plenty of options: 1. Run the engine as a VM under a local libvirt, and cluster the libvirt VM as a protected service using RHCS (well tested and documented) 2. Use the self hosted engine (recently announced, coming up tech) 3. Use any other clustering technology you like best, an engine VM with a centrally backed storage is very easy to start on any capable host On Wed, Sep 25, 2013tel:2013 at 10:06 AM, Doug Bishop dbis...@controlscan.commailto:dbis...@controlscan.commailto:dbis...@controlscan.commailto:dbis...@controlscan.com wrote: Hello, Was wondering if anyone can shed a light on this subject as I could not find any documentation specific to this. I am currently running an ovirt 3.2 cluster with 5 hosts with local storage. I have a dedicated box running ovirt engine. I would like to have the ability to run an additional box with ovirt engine on it for high availability of the portal. I realize this would most likely require I run a separate instance of postgres for the engine, however I was wondering if this is something that is officially supported? Thanks! Doug Bishop Sr. Systems Engineer dbis...@controlscan.commailto:dbis...@controlscan.commailto:dbis...@controlscan.commailto:dbis...@controlscan.com Controlscan, Inc. 11475 Great Oaks Way, Suite 300 Alpharetta, GA 30022 www.controlscan.comhttp://www.controlscan.comhttp://www.controlscan.com NOTICE: This e-mail message, including any attachments, is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) or entity and may contain sensitive information that is confidential, proprietary, privileged or otherwise protected by law. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure, distribution, copying or other use of, or taking of any action in reliance upon, is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of this message. This e-mail is and any response to it will be unencrypted and, therefore, potentially unsecure. The recipient should check this email and any attachments for the presence of viruses/malware according to security best practices. Thank you. ___ Users mailing list Users@ovirt.orgmailto:Users@ovirt.orgmailto:Users@ovirt.orgmailto:Users@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users NOTICE: This e-mail message, including any attachments, is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) or entity and may contain sensitive information that is confidential, proprietary, privileged or otherwise protected by law. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure, distribution, copying or other use of, or taking of any action in reliance upon, is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of this message. This e-mail is and any response to it will be unencrypted and, therefore, potentially unsecure. The recipient should check this email and any attachments for the presence of viruses/malware according to security best practices. Thank you. NOTICE: This e-mail message, including any attachments, is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) or entity and may contain sensitive information that is confidential, proprietary, privileged or otherwise protected by law. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure, distribution, copying or other use of, or taking of any action in
Re: [Users] Ovirt engine high availability
The official way is to have a SAN or NFS in place, so you can allocate a LUN for the engine. Multiple hosts/DCs with local storage are quite the corner case IMO. On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 2:31 PM, Doug Bishop dbis...@controlscan.comwrote: Yeah, that was along the lines of what I was thinking. Just wanted to make sure there wasnt an official way to do it as well. Thanks! Doug Bishop Sr. Systems Engineer Cell: 678-848-6658 dbis...@controlscan.com Controlscan, Inc. 11475 Great Oaks Way, Suite 300 Alpharetta, GA 30022 www.controlscan.com From: Dan Yasny [dya...@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, September 25, 2013 4:31 PM To: Doug Bishop Cc: users@ovirt.org Subject: Re: [Users] Ovirt engine high availability The classic answer here would be to use DRBD to replicate the engine storage to a standby host's local storage. On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 2:25 PM, Doug Bishop dbis...@controlscan.com mailto:dbis...@controlscan.com wrote: Those are good options, however since I am not running centralized storage, all my hosts are in their own data center with local storage options only. Thats why I have two standalone machines to run ovirt on. Im guessing this is not recommended? If not is there away to allow local storage and nfs based storage in a data center? Doug Bishop Sr. Systems Engineer Cell: 678-848-6658 dbis...@controlscan.commailto:dbis...@controlscan.com Controlscan, Inc. 11475 Great Oaks Way, Suite 300 Alpharetta, GA 30022 www.controlscan.comhttp://www.controlscan.com From: Dan Yasny [dya...@gmail.commailto:dya...@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, September 25, 2013tel:2013 12:14 PM To: Doug Bishop Cc: users@ovirt.orgmailto:users@ovirt.org Subject: Re: [Users] Ovirt engine high availability There are plenty of options: 1. Run the engine as a VM under a local libvirt, and cluster the libvirt VM as a protected service using RHCS (well tested and documented) 2. Use the self hosted engine (recently announced, coming up tech) 3. Use any other clustering technology you like best, an engine VM with a centrally backed storage is very easy to start on any capable host On Wed, Sep 25, 2013tel:2013 at 10:06 AM, Doug Bishop dbis...@controlscan.commailto:dbis...@controlscan.commailto: dbis...@controlscan.commailto:dbis...@controlscan.com wrote: Hello, Was wondering if anyone can shed a light on this subject as I could not find any documentation specific to this. I am currently running an ovirt 3.2 cluster with 5 hosts with local storage. I have a dedicated box running ovirt engine. I would like to have the ability to run an additional box with ovirt engine on it for high availability of the portal. I realize this would most likely require I run a separate instance of postgres for the engine, however I was wondering if this is something that is officially supported? Thanks! Doug Bishop Sr. Systems Engineer dbis...@controlscan.commailto:dbis...@controlscan.commailto: dbis...@controlscan.commailto:dbis...@controlscan.com Controlscan, Inc. 11475 Great Oaks Way, Suite 300 Alpharetta, GA 30022 www.controlscan.comhttp://www.controlscan.comhttp://www.controlscan.com NOTICE: This e-mail message, including any attachments, is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) or entity and may contain sensitive information that is confidential, proprietary, privileged or otherwise protected by law. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure, distribution, copying or other use of, or taking of any action in reliance upon, is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of this message. This e-mail is and any response to it will be unencrypted and, therefore, potentially unsecure. The recipient should check this email and any attachments for the presence of viruses/malware according to security best practices. Thank you. ___ Users mailing list Users@ovirt.orgmailto:Users@ovirt.orgmailto:Users@ovirt.orgmailto: Users@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users NOTICE: This e-mail message, including any attachments, is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) or entity and may contain sensitive information that is confidential, proprietary, privileged or otherwise protected by law. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure, distribution, copying or other use of, or taking of any action in reliance upon, is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of this message. This e-mail is and any response to it will be unencrypted and, therefore, potentially unsecure. The recipient should check this email and any attachments for the presence of viruses/malware according to security best practices. Thank you. NOTICE: This e-mail message,
Re: [Users] Ovirt engine high availability
Yes. However we are using it for a dev / qa environments in house. We plan to roll rhev into production soon and will be using backend storage. Doug Bishop Sr. Systems Engineer Cell: 678-848-6658 dbis...@controlscan.com Controlscan, Inc. 11475 Great Oaks Way, Suite 300 Alpharetta, GA 30022 www.controlscan.com From: Dan Yasny [dya...@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, September 25, 2013 4:34 PM To: Doug Bishop Cc: users@ovirt.org Subject: Re: [Users] Ovirt engine high availability The official way is to have a SAN or NFS in place, so you can allocate a LUN for the engine. Multiple hosts/DCs with local storage are quite the corner case IMO. On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 2:31 PM, Doug Bishop dbis...@controlscan.commailto:dbis...@controlscan.com wrote: Yeah, that was along the lines of what I was thinking. Just wanted to make sure there wasnt an official way to do it as well. Thanks! Doug Bishop Sr. Systems Engineer Cell: 678-848-6658 dbis...@controlscan.commailto:dbis...@controlscan.com Controlscan, Inc. 11475 Great Oaks Way, Suite 300 Alpharetta, GA 30022 www.controlscan.comhttp://www.controlscan.com From: Dan Yasny [dya...@gmail.commailto:dya...@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, September 25, 2013tel:2013 4:31 PM To: Doug Bishop Cc: users@ovirt.orgmailto:users@ovirt.org Subject: Re: [Users] Ovirt engine high availability The classic answer here would be to use DRBD to replicate the engine storage to a standby host's local storage. On Wed, Sep 25, 2013tel:2013 at 2:25 PM, Doug Bishop dbis...@controlscan.commailto:dbis...@controlscan.commailto:dbis...@controlscan.commailto:dbis...@controlscan.com wrote: Those are good options, however since I am not running centralized storage, all my hosts are in their own data center with local storage options only. Thats why I have two standalone machines to run ovirt on. Im guessing this is not recommended? If not is there away to allow local storage and nfs based storage in a data center? Doug Bishop Sr. Systems Engineer Cell: 678-848-6658 dbis...@controlscan.commailto:dbis...@controlscan.commailto:dbis...@controlscan.commailto:dbis...@controlscan.com Controlscan, Inc. 11475 Great Oaks Way, Suite 300 Alpharetta, GA 30022 www.controlscan.comhttp://www.controlscan.comhttp://www.controlscan.com From: Dan Yasny [dya...@gmail.commailto:dya...@gmail.commailto:dya...@gmail.commailto:dya...@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, September 25, 2013tel:2013tel:2013tel:2013 12:14 PM To: Doug Bishop Cc: users@ovirt.orgmailto:users@ovirt.orgmailto:users@ovirt.orgmailto:users@ovirt.org Subject: Re: [Users] Ovirt engine high availability There are plenty of options: 1. Run the engine as a VM under a local libvirt, and cluster the libvirt VM as a protected service using RHCS (well tested and documented) 2. Use the self hosted engine (recently announced, coming up tech) 3. Use any other clustering technology you like best, an engine VM with a centrally backed storage is very easy to start on any capable host On Wed, Sep 25, 2013tel:2013tel:2013tel:2013 at 10:06 AM, Doug Bishop dbis...@controlscan.commailto:dbis...@controlscan.commailto:dbis...@controlscan.commailto:dbis...@controlscan.commailto:dbis...@controlscan.commailto:dbis...@controlscan.commailto:dbis...@controlscan.commailto:dbis...@controlscan.com wrote: Hello, Was wondering if anyone can shed a light on this subject as I could not find any documentation specific to this. I am currently running an ovirt 3.2 cluster with 5 hosts with local storage. I have a dedicated box running ovirt engine. I would like to have the ability to run an additional box with ovirt engine on it for high availability of the portal. I realize this would most likely require I run a separate instance of postgres for the engine, however I was wondering if this is something that is officially supported? Thanks! Doug Bishop Sr. Systems Engineer dbis...@controlscan.commailto:dbis...@controlscan.commailto:dbis...@controlscan.commailto:dbis...@controlscan.commailto:dbis...@controlscan.commailto:dbis...@controlscan.commailto:dbis...@controlscan.commailto:dbis...@controlscan.com Controlscan, Inc. 11475 Great Oaks Way, Suite 300 Alpharetta, GA 30022 www.controlscan.comhttp://www.controlscan.comhttp://www.controlscan.comhttp://www.controlscan.com NOTICE: This e-mail message, including any attachments, is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) or entity and may contain sensitive information that is confidential, proprietary, privileged or otherwise protected by law. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure, distribution, copying or other use of, or taking of any action in reliance upon, is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of this message. This e-mail is and any response to it will be unencrypted and, therefore,
Re: [Users] Ovirt engine high availability
Sounds like a good, solid plan to me On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 2:34 PM, Doug Bishop dbis...@controlscan.comwrote: Yes. However we are using it for a dev / qa environments in house. We plan to roll rhev into production soon and will be using backend storage. Doug Bishop Sr. Systems Engineer Cell: 678-848-6658 dbis...@controlscan.com Controlscan, Inc. 11475 Great Oaks Way, Suite 300 Alpharetta, GA 30022 www.controlscan.com From: Dan Yasny [dya...@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, September 25, 2013 4:34 PM To: Doug Bishop Cc: users@ovirt.org Subject: Re: [Users] Ovirt engine high availability The official way is to have a SAN or NFS in place, so you can allocate a LUN for the engine. Multiple hosts/DCs with local storage are quite the corner case IMO. On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 2:31 PM, Doug Bishop dbis...@controlscan.com mailto:dbis...@controlscan.com wrote: Yeah, that was along the lines of what I was thinking. Just wanted to make sure there wasnt an official way to do it as well. Thanks! Doug Bishop Sr. Systems Engineer Cell: 678-848-6658 dbis...@controlscan.commailto:dbis...@controlscan.com Controlscan, Inc. 11475 Great Oaks Way, Suite 300 Alpharetta, GA 30022 www.controlscan.comhttp://www.controlscan.com From: Dan Yasny [dya...@gmail.commailto:dya...@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, September 25, 2013tel:2013 4:31 PM To: Doug Bishop Cc: users@ovirt.orgmailto:users@ovirt.org Subject: Re: [Users] Ovirt engine high availability The classic answer here would be to use DRBD to replicate the engine storage to a standby host's local storage. On Wed, Sep 25, 2013tel:2013 at 2:25 PM, Doug Bishop dbis...@controlscan.commailto:dbis...@controlscan.commailto: dbis...@controlscan.commailto:dbis...@controlscan.com wrote: Those are good options, however since I am not running centralized storage, all my hosts are in their own data center with local storage options only. Thats why I have two standalone machines to run ovirt on. Im guessing this is not recommended? If not is there away to allow local storage and nfs based storage in a data center? Doug Bishop Sr. Systems Engineer Cell: 678-848-6658 dbis...@controlscan.commailto:dbis...@controlscan.commailto: dbis...@controlscan.commailto:dbis...@controlscan.com Controlscan, Inc. 11475 Great Oaks Way, Suite 300 Alpharetta, GA 30022 www.controlscan.comhttp://www.controlscan.comhttp://www.controlscan.com From: Dan Yasny [dya...@gmail.commailto:dya...@gmail.commailto: dya...@gmail.commailto:dya...@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, September 25, 2013tel:2013tel:2013tel:2013 12:14 PM To: Doug Bishop Cc: users@ovirt.orgmailto:users@ovirt.orgmailto:users@ovirt.orgmailto: users@ovirt.org Subject: Re: [Users] Ovirt engine high availability There are plenty of options: 1. Run the engine as a VM under a local libvirt, and cluster the libvirt VM as a protected service using RHCS (well tested and documented) 2. Use the self hosted engine (recently announced, coming up tech) 3. Use any other clustering technology you like best, an engine VM with a centrally backed storage is very easy to start on any capable host On Wed, Sep 25, 2013tel:2013tel:2013tel:2013 at 10:06 AM, Doug Bishop dbis...@controlscan.commailto:dbis...@controlscan.commailto: dbis...@controlscan.commailto:dbis...@controlscan.commailto: dbis...@controlscan.commailto:dbis...@controlscan.commailto: dbis...@controlscan.commailto:dbis...@controlscan.com wrote: Hello, Was wondering if anyone can shed a light on this subject as I could not find any documentation specific to this. I am currently running an ovirt 3.2 cluster with 5 hosts with local storage. I have a dedicated box running ovirt engine. I would like to have the ability to run an additional box with ovirt engine on it for high availability of the portal. I realize this would most likely require I run a separate instance of postgres for the engine, however I was wondering if this is something that is officially supported? Thanks! Doug Bishop Sr. Systems Engineer dbis...@controlscan.commailto:dbis...@controlscan.commailto: dbis...@controlscan.commailto:dbis...@controlscan.commailto: dbis...@controlscan.commailto:dbis...@controlscan.commailto: dbis...@controlscan.commailto:dbis...@controlscan.com Controlscan, Inc. 11475 Great Oaks Way, Suite 300 Alpharetta, GA 30022 www.controlscan.comhttp://www.controlscan.comhttp://www.controlscan.com http://www.controlscan.com NOTICE: This e-mail message, including any attachments, is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) or entity and may contain sensitive information that is confidential, proprietary, privileged or otherwise protected by law. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure, distribution, copying or other use of, or taking of any action in reliance upon, is strictly prohibited. If
[Users] importing VM from ESXI
Hi, I'm not being able to import a VM from ESXI: [root@ovirt-mgmt ~]# LIBGUESTFS_TRACE=1 LIBGUESTFS_DEBUG=1 virt-v2v -ic esx://10.11.12.123/?no_verify=1 -o rhev -os 10.11.12.222:/var/lib/exports/export --network ovirtmgt MultiDektec MultiDektec_MultiDektec: 100% [==]D 0h36m54s libguestfs: trace: set_verbose true libguestfs: trace: set_verbose = 0 libguestfs: trace: set_backend appliance libguestfs: trace: set_backend = 0 libguestfs: create: flags = 0, handle = 0x4431d30, program = perl libguestfs: trace: set_attach_method appliance libguestfs: trace: set_backend appliance libguestfs: trace: set_backend = 0 libguestfs: trace: set_attach_method = 0 libguestfs: trace: add_drive /tmp/KxIoJI50Pc/2872ac3e-7340-4dfa-9801-0a1bd052b3a3/v2v._ApSlRZG/387a5113-bbc2-45a2-9c55-5dc3dade31a9/01c899de-131e-4407-a16c-8c5484ccb8bd format:raw iface:ide name:sda libguestfs: trace: add_drive = 0 libguestfs: trace: add_drive /tmp/to3mfS2mtB readonly:true format:raw iface:ide libguestfs: trace: add_drive = 0 libguestfs: trace: set_network true libguestfs: trace: set_network = 0 libguestfs: trace: launch libguestfs: trace: get_tmpdir libguestfs: trace: get_tmpdir = /tmp libguestfs: trace: get_backend libguestfs: trace: get_backend = direct libguestfs: launch: backend=direct libguestfs: launch: tmpdir=/tmp/libguestfsbaJ32y libguestfs: launch: umask=0022 libguestfs: launch: euid=36 libguestfs: command: run: supermin-helper libguestfs: command: run: \ --verbose libguestfs: command: run: \ -u 36 libguestfs: command: run: \ -g 36 libguestfs: command: run: \ -f checksum libguestfs: command: run: \ /usr/lib64/guestfs/supermin.d libguestfs: command: run: \ x86_64 supermin helper [8ms] whitelist = (not specified), host_cpu = x86_64, kernel = (null), initrd = (null), appliance = (null) supermin helper [9ms] inputs[0] = /usr/lib64/guestfs/supermin.d checking modpath /lib/modules/3.10.10-200.fc19.x86_64 is a directory checking modpath /lib/modules/3.11.1-200.fc19.x86_64 is a directory checking modpath /lib/modules/3.10.11-200.fc19.x86_64 is a directory picked vmlinuz-3.11.1-200.fc19.x86_64 supermin helper [00010ms] finished creating kernel supermin helper [00010ms] visiting /usr/lib64/guestfs/supermin.d supermin helper [00010ms] visiting /usr/lib64/guestfs/supermin.d/base.img supermin helper [00055ms] visiting /usr/lib64/guestfs/supermin.d/daemon.img supermin helper [00057ms] visiting /usr/lib64/guestfs/supermin.d/hostfiles supermin helper [00419ms] visiting /usr/lib64/guestfs/supermin.d/init.img supermin helper [00440ms] visiting /usr/lib64/guestfs/supermin.d/udev-rules.img supermin helper [00468ms] adding kernel modules supermin helper [00528ms] finished creating appliance libguestfs: checksum of existing appliance: 096bf8833aed53a33f7c0da2a5e685ad430bba5b50ae20a7e0325bca32cca6d2 libguestfs: trace: get_cachedir libguestfs: trace: get_cachedir = /var/tmp libguestfs: [00718ms] begin testing qemu features libguestfs: command: run: /usr/bin/qemu-kvm libguestfs: command: run: \ -nographic libguestfs: command: run: \ -help libguestfs: command: run: /usr/bin/qemu-kvm libguestfs: command: run: \ -nographic libguestfs: command: run: \ -version libguestfs: qemu version 1.4 libguestfs: command: run: /usr/bin/qemu-kvm libguestfs: command: run: \ -nographic libguestfs: command: run: \ -machine accel=kvm:tcg libguestfs: command: run: \ -device ? libguestfs: [01607ms] finished testing qemu features [01608ms] /usr/bin/qemu-kvm \ -global virtio-blk-pci.scsi=off \ -nodefconfig \ -nodefaults \ -nographic \ -machine accel=kvm:tcg \ -m 500 \ -no-reboot \ -no-hpet \ -kernel /var/tmp/.guestfs-36/kernel.52160 \ -initrd /var/tmp/.guestfs-36/initrd.52160 \ -device virtio-scsi-pci,id=scsi \ -drive file=/tmp/KxIoJI50Pc/2872ac3e-7340-4dfa-9801-0a1bd052b3a3/v2v._ApSlRZG/387a5113-bbc2-45a2-9c55-5dc3dade31a9/01c899de-131e-4407-a16c-8c5484ccb8bd,cache=none,format=raw,id=hd0,if=ide \ -drive file=/tmp/to3mfS2mtB,snapshot=on,format=raw,id=hd1,if=ide \ -drive file=/var/tmp/.guestfs-36/root.52160,snapshot=on,id=appliance,if=none,cache=unsafe \ -device scsi-hd,drive=appliance \ -device virtio-serial \ -serial stdio \ -device sga \ -chardev socket,path=/tmp/libguestfsbaJ32y/guestfsd.sock,id=channel0 \ -device virtserialport,chardev=channel0,name=org.libguestfs.channel.0 \ -netdev user,id=usernet,net=169.254.0.0/16 \ -device virtio-net-pci,netdev=usernet \ -append 'panic=1 console=ttyS0 udevtimeout=600 no_timer_check acpi=off printk.time=1 cgroup_disable=memory root=/dev/sdc selinux=0 guestfs_verbose=1 TERM=screen' qemu-system-x86_64: -drive file=/tmp/KxIoJI50Pc/2872ac3e-7340-4dfa-9801-0a1bd052b3a3/v2v._ApSlRZG/387a5113-bbc2-45a2-9c55-5dc3dade31a9/01c899de-131e-4407-a16c-8c5484ccb8bd,cache=none,format=raw,id=hd0,if=ide: could not open
Re: [Users] vdsm live migration errors in latest master
On Tue, Sep 24, 2013 at 12:04:14PM -0400, Federico Simoncelli wrote: - Original Message - From: Dan Kenigsberg dan...@redhat.com To: Dead Horse deadhorseconsult...@gmail.com Cc: users@ovirt.org users@ovirt.org, vdsm-de...@fedorahosted.org, fsimo...@redhat.com, aba...@redhat.com Sent: Tuesday, September 24, 2013 11:44:48 AM Subject: Re: [Users] vdsm live migration errors in latest master On Mon, Sep 23, 2013 at 04:05:34PM -0500, Dead Horse wrote: Seeing failed live migrations and these errors in the vdsm logs with latest VDSM/Engine master. Hosts are EL6.4 Thanks for posting this report. The log is from the source of migration, right? Could you trace the history of the hosts of this VM? Could it be that it was started on an older version of vdsm (say ovirt-3.3.0) and then (due to migration or vdsm upgrade) got into a host with a much newer vdsm? Would you share the vmCreate (or vmMigrationCreate) line for this Vm in your log? I smells like an unintended regression of http://gerrit.ovirt.org/17714 vm: extend shared property to support locking solving it may not be trivial, as we should not call _normalizeDriveSharedAttribute() automatically on migration destination, as it may well still be apart of a 3.3 clusterLevel. Also, migration from vdsm with extended shared property, to an ovirt 3.3 vdsm is going to explode (in a different way), since the destination does not expect the extended values. Federico, do we have a choice but to revert that patch, and use something like shared3 property instead? I filed a bug at: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1011608 A possible fix could be: http://gerrit.ovirt.org/#/c/19509 Beyond this, we must make sure that on Engine side, the extended shared values would be used only for clusterLevel 3.4 and above. Are the extended shared values already used by Engine? ___ Users mailing list Users@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Re: [Users] Disk state - Illegal?
I noticed that too, I wasn't sure if it was a bug or just how I had setup my NFS share.. There were three steps I did to remove the disk images, I'm sure there's a 100% easier solution..: I found the easiest way (graphically) was go to your https://ovirtengine/api/disks and so a search for the illegal disk. Append the extra ID eg. disk href=/api/disks/lk342-dfsdf... into your URL this'll give you your image ID. Go to your storage share: cd /data/storage-id/master/vms/storage-id grep -ir 'vmname' * You'll find the image-id reference here too. Then the image you will want to remove is in the /data/storage-id/images/image-id I assume you could safely remove this whole folder if you wanted to delete the disk. To remove the illegal state I did it through the API so again with the URL above https://ovirtengine/disks/disk-id send a DELETE using HTTP/CURL Again, this was a poor mans solution but it worked for me. On Thu, Sep 26, 2013 at 4:04 AM, Dan Ferris dfer...@prometheusresearch.comwrote: Hi, I have another hopefully simple question. One VM that I am trying to remove says that it's disk state is illegal and when I try to remove the disk it says that it failed to initiate the removing of the disk. Is there an easy way to get rid of these illegal disk images? Dan __**_ Users mailing list Users@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/**mailman/listinfo/usershttp://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users ___ Users mailing list Users@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
