[SOGo] BTS activities for Monday, February 29 2016
Title: BTS activities for Monday, February 29 2016 BTS Activities Home page: http://www.sogo.nu/bugs Project: SOGo For the period covering: Monday, February 29 2016 idlast updatestatus (resolution)categorysummary 3543 2016-02-29 07:31:46 updated (open) ActiveSync Incomplete Sync using ActiveSync from Android device 3552 2016-02-29 18:28:28 updated (open) ActiveSync Deleting mails doesn't work 3544 2016-02-29 11:56:57 updated (fixed) Web Address Book addressbook by sql-source doesn't work - autocompletion, common name (cn), freebuys 3554 2016-02-29 13:44:26 updated (open) Web Mail Selecting messages with the keyboard doesn't work 3556 2016-02-29 14:10:17 updated (open) Web Mail New message - Paste recipient list 3557 2016-02-29 14:14:50 updated (open) Web Mail New message - can't select "return receipt" 3551 2016-02-29 19:21:51 assigned (open) Web Preferences Changing Sender Mail Address in Web Preferences Is Never Applied 3362 2016-02-29 11:10:12 resolved (not a bug) Backend Calendar Can't invite participant 3555 2016-02-29 13:48:25 resolved (fixed) Web Mail Print message 3553 2016-02-29 09:33:47 closed (not a bug) Web Mail Add possibility to delete multiple mails at once -- users@sogo.nuhttps://inverse.ca/sogo/lists
Re: [SOGo] high memory and cpu usage
With following parameters set you should be able to monitor what's going from the EAS point of view: SOGoEASDebugEnabled = YES; SOGoDebugRequests = YES Try to identify what reuqests are running when the cpu usage is high. Regards, Thomas -- users@sogo.nu https://inverse.ca/sogo/lists
Re: [SOGo] Forward mail with attachment
No, if I use "as attachment" the resulting message is blank with no attachments - I guess that's a bug then! I (and at least one other user I know of - woohoo! A sample of two) would like to be able to forward inline, optionally with attachments. This allows us to edit original content whilst including attachments. This expectation is due to functionality found in Thunderbird and the dreaded Outlook (and even in Android mail). In forwarding terms they both a) automatically include attachments in messages forwarded either inline or as an attachment, and b) additionally provide a "Forward As Attachment" button or menu option, allowing the user to choose with each message how they'd like to forward. In feature terms I'd like as a minimum a) and b) as a nice-to-have. Peter. On 29/02/2016 16:20, Christian Mack wrote: Hello Does it work with attachement? Kind regards, Christian Mack Am 29.02.2016 um 16:56 schrieb Peter B: Hi Christian, Set to inline (or rather not set, so defaulting to inline). Peter. On 29/02/2016 15:46, Christian Mack wrote: Am 29.02.2016 um 10:19 schrieb Peter B: Hi, (Ubuntu 14.04, nightlies currently 3.0.1.20160229-1) It's possible I'm being dim but in SOGo Web UI I can't find a way to forward a message with it's existing attachment. It seems the only way to do this is download the attachment, click to forward the message, then re-attach (via potentially slow and bandwidth-allocation-consuming upload) the attachment. Is this potentially a feature request? What have you set for Forwarding, "inline" or "as attachment"? Kind regards, Christian Mack -- users@sogo.nu https://inverse.ca/sogo/lists
[SOGo] Feature request: add selected to list in Address Book
A feature request: in an address book it would be great to add a "Create list/Add to existing" button/menu option to the selection bar for selected addresses in the address book list. This would greatly simplify creating large groups (20+ members), especially on mobile devices where typing is a pita. Thoughts? Peter. -- users@sogo.nu https://inverse.ca/sogo/lists
Re: [SOGo] Forward mail with attachment
Hello Does it work with attachement? Kind regards, Christian Mack Am 29.02.2016 um 16:56 schrieb Peter B: > Hi Christian, > > Set to inline (or rather not set, so defaulting to inline). > > Peter. > > On 29/02/2016 15:46, Christian Mack wrote: >> Am 29.02.2016 um 10:19 schrieb Peter B: >>> Hi, >>> >>> (Ubuntu 14.04, nightlies currently 3.0.1.20160229-1) >>> >>> It's possible I'm being dim but in SOGo Web UI I can't find a way to >>> forward a message with it's existing attachment. It seems the only way >>> to do this is download the attachment, click to forward the message, >>> then re-attach (via potentially slow and bandwidth-allocation-consuming >>> upload) the attachment. >>> >>> Is this potentially a feature request? >>> >> What have you set for Forwarding, "inline" or "as attachment"? >> >> >> Kind regards, >> Christian Mack >> > -- Christian Mack Universität Konstanz Kommunikations-, Informations-, Medienzentrum (KIM) Abteilung Basisdienste 78457 Konstanz +49 7531 88-4416 smime.p7s Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
Re: [SOGo] Forward mail with attachment
Hi Christian, Set to inline (or rather not set, so defaulting to inline). Peter. On 29/02/2016 15:46, Christian Mack wrote: Am 29.02.2016 um 10:19 schrieb Peter B: Hi, (Ubuntu 14.04, nightlies currently 3.0.1.20160229-1) It's possible I'm being dim but in SOGo Web UI I can't find a way to forward a message with it's existing attachment. It seems the only way to do this is download the attachment, click to forward the message, then re-attach (via potentially slow and bandwidth-allocation-consuming upload) the attachment. Is this potentially a feature request? What have you set for Forwarding, "inline" or "as attachment"? Kind regards, Christian Mack -- users@sogo.nu https://inverse.ca/sogo/lists
[SOGo] 501 Error on Login
Hi, when i will connect to Sogo (v3) i will got the follow error in Apache-Log 192.168.x.x - - [29/Feb/2016:16:25:28 +0100] "POST /SOGo/connect HTTP/1.1" 501 667 "https://sogo.dev.internal/SOGo/"; "Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10_11_4) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/48.0.2564.116 Safari/537.36“ so i have test on another system and got 192.168.x.x - - [29/Feb/2016:16:31:46 +0100] "POST /SOGo/connect HTTP/1.1" 200 677 "https://sogo2.dev.internal/SOGo/so/"; "Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10_11_4) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/48.0.2564.116 Safari/537.36“ So its different in /SOGo/ /SOGo/so/ In Apache its configured: ProxyPass /SOGo http://127.0.0.1:2/SOGo retry=0 http://127.0.0.1:2/SOGo> RequestHeader set "x-webobjects-server-port" "443" RequestHeader set "x-webobjects-server-name" "sogo.dev.internal" RequestHeader set "x-webobjects-server-url" "https://sogo.dev.internal"; RequestHeader unset "x-webobjects-remote-user" RequestHeader set "x-webobjects-server-protocol" "HTTP/1.0" AddDefaultCharset UTF-8 Order allow,deny Allow from all So now i don’t have an idea where the problem is signature.asc Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
Re: [SOGo] Front end login not working anymore since 2.3.5 or 2.3.6
Hi all, coming back to this strange issue. I did perform a snapshot of the machine and switched to nightly hoping to have this issue somehow fixed - but with no success. I (again) saw the following error lines: Feb 29 16:10:01 sogod [4688]: <0x0x7f1409dad9b0[SOGoWebAuthenticator]> tried wrong password for user 'wW4fRAfpS70pgYsHG9cMeQy7N77cM/k4D5eRHMhxpgo/fYG7HS9RS7/jvcWw8hRkdHoJ2sMFnTpir08ARWQZzLctc1Y3quU4v44K2iV942PDcvVtUfCE0KtpkCPvUFCAaiqNl3BN2gYancCSpm6ciI5hGFUeWjaHxSqiHjHofWWing5XzN5Y1z5r6ME2Yhk0xZio25P5g6FIOiXmXFf8QA=='! …….. Feb 29 16:10:00 sogod [4688]: SOGoRootPage successful login from '[My_IP]' for user '[My_UID]' - expire = -1 grace = -1 2016-02-29 16:10:00.905 sogod[4688] SQL: BEGIN; 2016-02-29 16:10:00.905 sogod[4688] query has no results. 2016-02-29 16:10:00.905 sogod[4688] SQL: SELECT t1.c_creationdate, t1.c_id, t1.c_lastseen, t1.c_value FROM sogo_sessions_folder t1 WHERE t1.c_id='mvCQCheKKlcn1YmlccoU3g=='; 2016-02-29 16:10:00.906 sogod[4688] query has results, entering fetch-mode. 2016-02-29 16:10:00.906 sogod[4688] SQL: ROLLBACK; 2016-02-29 16:10:00.906 sogod[4688] query has no results. 2016-02-29 16:10:00.906 sogod[4688] SQL: BEGIN; 2016-02-29 16:10:00.906 sogod[4688] query has no results. 2016-02-29 16:10:00.906 sogod[4688] SQL: INSERT INTO sogo_sessions_folder (c_lastseen, c_creationdate, c_value, c_id) VALUES (1456758600, 1456758600, 'tQF9LWaaC9FA7/5/NrB5C3mVVNGxc8NSaqfmbKdC0go/fYG7HS9RS7/jvcWw8hRkdHoJ2sMFnTpir08ARWQZzLctc1Y3quU4v44K2iV942PDcvVtUfCE0KtpkCPvUFCAaiqNl3BN2gYancCSpm6ciI5hGFUeWjaHxSqiHjHofWWing5XzN5Y1z5r6ME2Yhk0xZio25P5g6FIOiXmXFf8QA==', 'mvCQCheKKlcn1YmlccoU3g=='); 2016-02-29 16:10:00.906 sogod[4688] query has no results. 2016-02-29 16:10:00.906 sogod[4688] SQL: COMMIT; 2016-02-29 16:10:00.907 sogod[4688] query has no results. I do also see the following message after the above ones being reproducible: 2016-02-29 16:46:11.499 sogod[1637] ERROR(-[NSNull(misc) forwardInvocation:]): called selector objectForKey: on NSNull ! 2016-02-29 16:46:11.499 sogod[1637] ERROR(-[NSNull(misc) forwardInvocation:]): called selector objectForKey: on NSNull ! Login via the web frontend (2.3.8-1) is still impossible Can anybody help with it, please? Cheers Tobias > Am 09.02.2016 um 08:49 schrieb Mailing Lists : > > Hi Christian, > > thanks for the input, but I did run it when upgrading to 2.3.0. Afterwards > everything was running fine until 2.3.5 or 2.3.6 > IIRC I once was running on nightly build and then switched back to stable. > Could it be that there is some weird code somewhere left which causes > problems now? > I am also planning to upgrade to 3.0.x in the near future. > Could this maybe also be worth a try or should I just try to solve the issue > first since it is running on the same data set(s)? > For me personally, it looks not like a DB issue rather than like a > frontend-code issue or so… > Quite strange at all… > > Cheers > Tobias > > > >> Am 08.02.2016 um 16:05 schrieb Christian Mack >> : >> >> Hello >> >> Did you upgrade froma pre 2.3.0 Version? >> >> If yes, run the needed sql-update-2.2.17_to_2.3.0-mysql.sh >> >> >> Kind regards, >> Christian Mack >> >> Am 06.02.2016 um 17:26 schrieb Mailing Lists: >>> Hi List, >>> >>> since one of the last upgrade from stable sources, login through the >>> web-frontend is not possible any more. >>> All other functionality (such as IMAP, CalDAV and CardDAV) works properly. >>> >>> Running on Debian 8.3 (Jessie) with apache 2.4.10-10+deb8u4. DB is MySQL >>> and is being managed by a web hosting software using a MySQL view. >>> >>> Log shows: >>> >>> Feb 06 16:49:12 sogod [24985]: |SOGo| starting method 'POST' on uri >>> '/SOGo/connect' >>> 2016-02-06 16:49:12.119 sogod[24985] >> connection=0x0x7fc906423d00> SQL: SELECT c_password FROM sogo_users WHERE >>> c_uid = 'my_user@my_domain.com'; >>> 2016-02-06 16:49:12.119 sogod[24985] >> connection=0x0x7fc906423d00> query has results, entering fetch-mode. >>> Feb 06 16:49:12 sogod [24985]: SOGoRootPage successful login from >>> ‚my_client_ip' for user ‚my_user@my_domain.com' - expire = -1 grace = -1 >>> 2016-02-06 16:49:12.120 sogod[24985] >> connection=0x0x7fc906423d00> SQL: BEGIN; >>> 2016-02-06 16:49:12.121 sogod[24985] >> connection=0x0x7fc906423d00> query has no results. >>> 2016-02-06 16:49:12.121 sogod[24985] >> connection=0x0x7fc906423d00> SQL: SELECT t1.c_creationdate, t1.c_id, >>> t1.c_lastseen, t1.c_value FROM sogo_sessions_folder t1 WHERE >>> t1.c_id='kY52T2m+dsiUZjgQqMTEGg=='; >>> 2016-02-06 16:49:12.121 sogod[24985] >> connection=0x0x7fc906423d00> query has results, entering fetch-mode. >>> 2016-02-06 16:49:12.122 sogod[24985] >> connection=0x0x7fc906423d00> SQL: ROLLBACK; >>> 2016-02-06 16:49:12.122 sogod[24985] >> connection=0x0x7fc906423d00> query has no results. >>> 2016-02-06 16:49:12.122 sogod[24985] >> connection=0x0x7fc9065fed10> SQL: BEGIN; >>> 2016-02-06 16:49:12.122 sogod[24985] >> connection=0x0x7fc9065
Re: [SOGo] 3.0.1 slowness
Il 29/02/2016 16:01, Christian Mack ha scritto: > Am 29.02.2016 um 10:24 schrieb Alessandro Briosi: >> > Hi all. >> > >> > Some of my users have tryed out the new interface of SOGo. >> > Beside the fact that it's wasting too much space on a desktop screen as >> > it should and some other things which basically either were already >> > reported or I created a bug, >> > they lamented that interfaces seems to be slower than the 2.3 version, >> > > There where no speed optimizations till now. > So this will improve. good :) >> > P.S. there is also a minor thing, the browser title is missing (?), or >> > there's a configuration missing somewhere? >> > > You have SOGoUIxDebugEnabled debugging option on, therefore no browser > title. > That fixed it, thanks. Alessandro -- users@sogo.nu https://inverse.ca/sogo/lists
Re:[SOGo]
Sorry for not including those. I really didn't think they would be
needed. Since the emails are going out and it appears to only be a
issue with the web interface.
Server information:
Sogo Version: 2.3.8-1.centos6
OS: CentOS release 6.7 (Final)
Kernel: 2.6.32-573.18.1.el6.x86_64
/* SMTP server configuration */
SOGoMailingMechanism = smtp;
SOGoSMTPServer = 127.0.0.1:25;
Webclient Information:
OS: Windows 10
Chrome version: 48.0.2564.116 m (no extensions or plugins enabled)
On Mon, Feb 29, 2016 at 10:40 AM, Christian Mack
wrote:
> Am 29.02.2016 um 16:18 schrieb Pyromanci .:
>> Hello,
>>
>> I've been trying to get an installation of openchange and sogo working
>> with a samba 4 AD DC. I finally got it to the point where i could log
>> in and start sending emails (through the webmail interface).
>>
>> However when you click send. It appeared as though nothing happened.
>> Though the buttons up top were no longer clickable. When i opened up
>> chromes developer console. I did see the request go out and a response
>> of "{"status": "success"}" when send was clicked. Though the window
>> does nothing.
>>
>> I can confirm that the email does in fact go out. So i'm left
>> wondering if there is something in the javascript that is not
>> functioning properly.
>>
>> Does anyone have any ideas?
>>
>
> Which sogo version?
> Which OS?
> Which sogo.conf settings for SMTP?
>
>
> Kind regards,
> Christian Mack
>
> --
> Christian Mack
> Universität Konstanz
> Kommunikations-, Informations-, Medienzentrum (KIM)
> Abteilung Basisdienste
> 78457 Konstanz
> +49 7531 88-4416
>
--
users@sogo.nu
https://inverse.ca/sogo/lists
Re: [SOGo] Forward mail with attachment
Am 29.02.2016 um 10:19 schrieb Peter B: > Hi, > > (Ubuntu 14.04, nightlies currently 3.0.1.20160229-1) > > It's possible I'm being dim but in SOGo Web UI I can't find a way to > forward a message with it's existing attachment. It seems the only way > to do this is download the attachment, click to forward the message, > then re-attach (via potentially slow and bandwidth-allocation-consuming > upload) the attachment. > > Is this potentially a feature request? > What have you set for Forwarding, "inline" or "as attachment"? Kind regards, Christian Mack -- Christian Mack Universität Konstanz Kommunikations-, Informations-, Medienzentrum (KIM) Abteilung Basisdienste 78457 Konstanz +49 7531 88-4416 smime.p7s Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
Re:[SOGo]
Am 29.02.2016 um 16:18 schrieb Pyromanci .:
> Hello,
>
> I've been trying to get an installation of openchange and sogo working
> with a samba 4 AD DC. I finally got it to the point where i could log
> in and start sending emails (through the webmail interface).
>
> However when you click send. It appeared as though nothing happened.
> Though the buttons up top were no longer clickable. When i opened up
> chromes developer console. I did see the request go out and a response
> of "{"status": "success"}" when send was clicked. Though the window
> does nothing.
>
> I can confirm that the email does in fact go out. So i'm left
> wondering if there is something in the javascript that is not
> functioning properly.
>
> Does anyone have any ideas?
>
Which sogo version?
Which OS?
Which sogo.conf settings for SMTP?
Kind regards,
Christian Mack
--
Christian Mack
Universität Konstanz
Kommunikations-, Informations-, Medienzentrum (KIM)
Abteilung Basisdienste
78457 Konstanz
+49 7531 88-4416
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
Re: [SOGo] 3.0.1 slowness
Il 29/02/2016 14:11, lists ha scritto: > On 29-2-2016 10:24, Alessandro Briosi wrote: >> Beside the fact that it's wasting too much space on a desktop screen as >> it should and some other things which basically either were already >> reported or I created a bug, >> they lamented that interfaces seems to be slower than the 2.3 version, > We feel the same, however, on our v2.3 install, everything (imap, > mysql) is running locally. And for the v3 install, basically > everything is remote. (different machine, same lan) > > We were thinking that perhaps this causes the slowness we observe..? That's also my setup, but I doubt the 2Gb (bonding) connection between the servers is to be blamed here. If needed I can setup a 2.3 install on a different machine as a test, Alessandro -- users@sogo.nu https://inverse.ca/sogo/lists
[SOGo]
Hello,
I've been trying to get an installation of openchange and sogo working
with a samba 4 AD DC. I finally got it to the point where i could log
in and start sending emails (through the webmail interface).
However when you click send. It appeared as though nothing happened.
Though the buttons up top were no longer clickable. When i opened up
chromes developer console. I did see the request go out and a response
of "{"status": "success"}" when send was clicked. Though the window
does nothing.
I can confirm that the email does in fact go out. So i'm left
wondering if there is something in the javascript that is not
functioning properly.
Does anyone have any ideas?
--
users@sogo.nu
https://inverse.ca/sogo/lists
Re: [SOGo] 3.0.1 slowness
Am 29.02.2016 um 10:24 schrieb Alessandro Briosi: > Hi all. > > Some of my users have tryed out the new interface of SOGo. > Beside the fact that it's wasting too much space on a desktop screen as > it should and some other things which basically either were already > reported or I created a bug, > they lamented that interfaces seems to be slower than the 2.3 version, > There where no speed optimizations till now. So this will improve. > P.S. there is also a minor thing, the browser title is missing (?), or > there's a configuration missing somewhere? > You have SOGoUIxDebugEnabled debugging option on, therefore no browser title. Kind regards, Christian Mack -- Christian Mack Universität Konstanz Kommunikations-, Informations-, Medienzentrum (KIM) Abteilung Basisdienste 78457 Konstanz +49 7531 88-4416 smime.p7s Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
Re: [SOGo] Install SOGo3 beside SOGo2
Am 29.02.2016 um 14:05 schrieb "Daniel Müller": > Hello to all, > is there a way,instruction how to install SOGo3 beside a SOGo2 installation > on > the same machine? > That will not work, because V3 will remove V2 while installing. You would have to compile and install V3 via sources and change default installation paths. Afterwards you have to change the port V3 is listening on, and create another vhost for apache, which points to the V3 sogod. Databse, LDAP/AD, SMTP and IMAP memcached should be shared. Kind regards, Christian Mack -- Christian Mack Universität Konstanz Kommunikations-, Informations-, Medienzentrum (KIM) Abteilung Basisdienste 78457 Konstanz +49 7531 88-4416 smime.p7s Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
Re: [SOGo] high memory and cpu usage
Hello Am 29.02.2016 um 12:38 schrieb anv: > I have a problem with sogo and outlook (activesync) clients. > > Sometimes it starts eating memory and CPU. The configuration is this (almost > all : > > SOGoMaximumPingInterval = 10; > SOGoMaximumSyncInterval = 30; > SOGoInternalSyncInterval = 10; > SOGoMaximumSyncResponseSize = 2048; > SOGoMaximumSyncWindowSize = 0; > > > See the graphics: > > > > Any help please? > I assume those are initial syncs per ActiveSync. SOGo has to get all data and deliver it to the client in chunks. If there is a lot of data, this takes resources! BTW: That was heavier before. Kind regards, Christian Mack -- Christian Mack Universität Konstanz Kommunikations-, Informations-, Medienzentrum (KIM) Abteilung Basisdienste 78457 Konstanz +49 7531 88-4416 smime.p7s Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
Re: [SOGo] 3.0.1 slowness
On 29-2-2016 10:24, Alessandro Briosi wrote: Beside the fact that it's wasting too much space on a desktop screen as it should and some other things which basically either were already reported or I created a bug, they lamented that interfaces seems to be slower than the 2.3 version, We feel the same, however, on our v2.3 install, everything (imap, mysql) is running locally. And for the v3 install, basically everything is remote. (different machine, same lan) We were thinking that perhaps this causes the slowness we observe..? -- users@sogo.nu https://inverse.ca/sogo/lists
[SOGo] Install SOGo3 beside SOGo2
Hello to all, is there a way,instruction how to install SOGo3 beside a SOGo2 installation on the same machine? Greetings Daniel -- users@sogo.nuhttps://inverse.ca/sogo/lists
Re: [SOGo] No child available to handle incoming request / pid xxx has been hanging in the same request for x minutes
El 19/02/16 a las 13:40, Alejandro Vargas escribió: I am trying to add SOGo to an already working server with Postfix + Dovecot. The server is Centos 7, 2 core with 3Gb RAM with less than 10 users. Sogo installed from official repo: sogo-2.3.8-1.el7.centos.x86_64 Sogo is configured with 10 workers with this configuration: WOWorkersCount = 10; WOListenQueueSize=10; WOWatchDogRequestTimeout=60; SOGoMaximumPingInterval = 354; SOGoMaximumSyncInterval = 354; SOGoInternalSyncInterval = 15; SOGoMaximumSyncWindowSize = 50; SOGoMaximumSyncResponseSize = 2048; Just configured default values and the problem is semi-solved. Now sometimes there is 100% CPU usage. I will start a new thread for this. -- users@sogo.nu https://inverse.ca/sogo/lists
[SOGo] 3.0.1 slowness
Hi all. Some of my users have tryed out the new interface of SOGo. Beside the fact that it's wasting too much space on a desktop screen as it should and some other things which basically either were already reported or I created a bug, they lamented that interfaces seems to be slower than the 2.3 version, Ciao, Alessandro P.S. there is also a minor thing, the browser title is missing (?), or there's a configuration missing somewhere? -- users@sogo.nu https://inverse.ca/sogo/lists
[SOGo] Forward mail with attachment
Hi, (Ubuntu 14.04, nightlies currently 3.0.1.20160229-1) It's possible I'm being dim but in SOGo Web UI I can't find a way to forward a message with it's existing attachment. It seems the only way to do this is download the attachment, click to forward the message, then re-attach (via potentially slow and bandwidth-allocation-consuming upload) the attachment. Is this potentially a feature request? Peter. -- users@sogo.nu https://inverse.ca/sogo/lists
[SOGo] high memory and cpu usage
I have a problem with sogo and outlook (activesync) clients. Sometimes it starts eating memory and CPU. The configuration is this (almost all : SOGoMaximumPingInterval = 10; SOGoMaximumSyncInterval = 30; SOGoInternalSyncInterval = 10; SOGoMaximumSyncResponseSize = 2048; SOGoMaximumSyncWindowSize = 0; See the graphics: Any help please? -- users@sogo.nu https://inverse.ca/sogo/lists
Re: [SOGo] DAV links displayed in Web UI are always HTTP
Am 26.02.2016 um 09:27 schrieb Peter B: > Hi, > > Ubuntu 14.04, nightlies (currently 3.0.1.20160219). > > Am loving SOGo, as a long time admin/user of several other platforms > (OX/Horde amongst them) I love the simplicity of SOGo from both admin > and user perspectives and that in the main it just works. > > An observation - when getting DAV urls the provided URL doesn't reflect > correctly the protocol used to access the server. I've configured apache > to redirect all access via HTTPS, so anyone using SOGo is forced to use > an SSL connection. However, URLs displayed under "Links to ..." are > returned as HTTP. > > This can present a problem, for example using this URL in Thunderbird > with the SOGo connector results in no synchronization, but no errors are > reported. This is because the server is returning a redirect and not the > data*. Change the URL from 'http://' to 'https://' and it works. > > Ideally, SOGo web UI would present DAV URLs that reflect the protocol > used to access the Web UI. > > Peter. > * Actually, thinking about it, is that a bug in the connector? Should it > follow the redirect or perhaps report an error? I've noticed that > Lightning doesn't have this problem when given an HTTP URL for the same > server, so I guess it's following the redirect. Either way, it would > still be good to show the relevant protocol in the URL provided... Just want to note: With the 2.3.8-er nightlies this doesn't happen. I always have "https://"; URLs. Kind regards, Christian Mack -- Christian Mack Universität Konstanz Kommunikations-, Informations-, Medienzentrum (KIM) Abteilung Basisdienste 78457 Konstanz +49 7531 88-4416 smime.p7s Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
