Re: [SOGo] Only the last line of SMTP answer is returned - so SOGo fails to see AUTH PLAIN - sending fails

2013-01-07 Thread John Bieling

On 01/06/2013 09:56 PM, John Bieling wrote:

Am 06.01.2013 20:09, schrieb Anselm Martin Hoffmeister:

Am 06.01.2013 16:45, schrieb John Bieling:

Am 06.01.2013 14:40, schrieb John Bieling:

Hi,

using sogo 2.0.3 with

sogod SOGoSMTPAuthenticationType PLAIN

enabled. This is the SMTP reply after EHLO with telnet

open smtp.wordlserver.net 25

220 mail01.worldserver.net ESMTP Speedbone Mailservice
EHLO sogoserver
250-mail01.worldserver.net
250-PIPELINING
250-SIZE 69730304
250-VRFY
250-ETRN
250-STARTTLS
250-AUTH PLAIN LOGIN CRAM-MD5
250-AUTH=PLAIN LOGIN CRAM-MD5


This is not RFC compliant, if I understand the spec correctly (see 
http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc5321 page 33). It seems some mailservers

send that AUTH=PLAIN to support old Outlook Express clients that need
this for authentication to work (cf. http://www.wogri.at/248.html?L=1 ).

It would by nice if SOGo went the extra mile to accept this
non-standard but obviously existant line. Being RFC compliant is not 
a bug, though :-)


BR
-AMH-


Can we do something about it? Can we patch the source, or will that 
only be done by inverse?


Are they reading this or do we have to ask/tell someone?

Thanks
John


If found the Bug-Report System and I found a simple fix for the problem.

http://www.sogo.nu/bugs/view.php?id=2161

Hope it will be used.

--
users@sogo.nu
https://inverse.ca/sogo/lists


[SOGo] Only the last line of SMTP answer is returned - so SOGo fails to see AUTH PLAIN - sending fails

2013-01-06 Thread John Bieling

Hi,

using sogo 2.0.3 with

sogod SOGoSMTPAuthenticationType PLAIN

enabled. This is the SMTP reply after EHLO with telnet

open smtp.wordlserver.net 25

220 mail01.worldserver.net ESMTP Speedbone Mailservice
EHLO sogoserver
250-mail01.worldserver.net
250-PIPELINING
250-SIZE 69730304
250-VRFY
250-ETRN
250-STARTTLS
250-AUTH PLAIN LOGIN CRAM-MD5
250-AUTH=PLAIN LOGIN CRAM-MD5
250-ENHANCEDSTATUSCODES
250 8BITMIME
QUIT
221 2.0.0 Bye

This is taken out of the logfile:

C: connect to 0x0xb969b420[NGInternetSocketAddress]: 
host=smtp.worldserver.net not-filled
S: SMTP-Reply: code=220 line='mail01.worldserver.net ESMTP Speedbone 
Mailservice'

C: EHLO sogoserver
S: SMTP-Reply: code=250 line='8BITMIME'
S: pipelining extension supported.
S: size extension supported.
C: QUIT
S: SMTP-Reply: code=221 line='2.0.0 Bye'

Anyone else? Bug?

Thanks
John
--
users@sogo.nu
https://inverse.ca/sogo/lists


Re: [SOGo] Only the last line of SMTP answer is returned - so SOGo fails to see AUTH PLAIN - sending fails

2013-01-06 Thread John Bieling

Am 06.01.2013 14:40, schrieb John Bieling:

Hi,

using sogo 2.0.3 with

sogod SOGoSMTPAuthenticationType PLAIN

enabled. This is the SMTP reply after EHLO with telnet

open smtp.wordlserver.net 25

220 mail01.worldserver.net ESMTP Speedbone Mailservice
EHLO sogoserver
250-mail01.worldserver.net
250-PIPELINING
250-SIZE 69730304
250-VRFY
250-ETRN
250-STARTTLS
250-AUTH PLAIN LOGIN CRAM-MD5
250-AUTH=PLAIN LOGIN CRAM-MD5
250-ENHANCEDSTATUSCODES
250 8BITMIME
QUIT
221 2.0.0 Bye

This is taken out of the logfile:

C: connect to 0x0xb969b420[NGInternetSocketAddress]: 
host=smtp.worldserver.net not-filled
S: SMTP-Reply: code=220 line='mail01.worldserver.net ESMTP Speedbone 
Mailservice'

C: EHLO sogoserver
S: SMTP-Reply: code=250 line='8BITMIME'
S: pipelining extension supported.
S: size extension supported.
C: QUIT
S: SMTP-Reply: code=221 line='2.0.0 Bye'

Anyone else? Bug?

Thanks
John
It seems as he only prints the last line of the reply in the logfile, 
but sees them all - because he states


S: pipelining extension supported.
S: size extension supported.

But why is he ignoring the AUTH PLAIN support? Is the answer mailformed? 
An other mailserver works with the same configuration...


Thanks
John
--
users@sogo.nu
https://inverse.ca/sogo/lists


Re: [SOGo] Only the last line of SMTP answer is returned - so SOGo fails to see AUTH PLAIN - sending fails

2013-01-06 Thread Anselm Martin Hoffmeister

Am 06.01.2013 16:45, schrieb John Bieling:

Am 06.01.2013 14:40, schrieb John Bieling:

Hi,

using sogo 2.0.3 with

sogod SOGoSMTPAuthenticationType PLAIN

enabled. This is the SMTP reply after EHLO with telnet

open smtp.wordlserver.net 25

220 mail01.worldserver.net ESMTP Speedbone Mailservice
EHLO sogoserver
250-mail01.worldserver.net
250-PIPELINING
250-SIZE 69730304
250-VRFY
250-ETRN
250-STARTTLS
250-AUTH PLAIN LOGIN CRAM-MD5
250-AUTH=PLAIN LOGIN CRAM-MD5


This is not RFC compliant, if I understand the spec correctly (see 
http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc5321 page 33). It seems some mailservers

send that AUTH=PLAIN to support old Outlook Express clients that need
this for authentication to work (cf. http://www.wogri.at/248.html?L=1 ).

It would by nice if SOGo went the extra mile to accept this
non-standard but obviously existant line. Being RFC compliant is not a 
bug, though :-)


BR
-AMH-
--
users@sogo.nu
https://inverse.ca/sogo/lists


Re: [SOGo] Only the last line of SMTP answer is returned - so SOGo fails to see AUTH PLAIN - sending fails

2013-01-06 Thread John Bieling

Am 06.01.2013 20:09, schrieb Anselm Martin Hoffmeister:

Am 06.01.2013 16:45, schrieb John Bieling:

Am 06.01.2013 14:40, schrieb John Bieling:

Hi,

using sogo 2.0.3 with

sogod SOGoSMTPAuthenticationType PLAIN

enabled. This is the SMTP reply after EHLO with telnet

open smtp.wordlserver.net 25

220 mail01.worldserver.net ESMTP Speedbone Mailservice
EHLO sogoserver
250-mail01.worldserver.net
250-PIPELINING
250-SIZE 69730304
250-VRFY
250-ETRN
250-STARTTLS
250-AUTH PLAIN LOGIN CRAM-MD5
250-AUTH=PLAIN LOGIN CRAM-MD5


This is not RFC compliant, if I understand the spec correctly (see 
http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc5321 page 33). It seems some mailservers

send that AUTH=PLAIN to support old Outlook Express clients that need
this for authentication to work (cf. http://www.wogri.at/248.html?L=1 ).

It would by nice if SOGo went the extra mile to accept this
non-standard but obviously existant line. Being RFC compliant is not a 
bug, though :-)


BR
-AMH-


Can we do something about it? Can we patch the source, or will that only 
be done by inverse?


Are they reading this or do we have to ask/tell someone?

Thanks
John
--
users@sogo.nu
https://inverse.ca/sogo/lists