RE: Your message to the Irish Online Help Desk Re: ObfuscationQuestion
On Fri, 2009-08-28 at 19:50 -0700, Robert Hanson wrote:
i seem to recall that the SA list software accepts submissions from
non-subscribed addresses [...]
It doesn't. Posts by non-subscribers are held for moderation, to be
processed by humans. Same for low-scoring spam, BTW.
I am not the only one who gets to wade through the moderation queue,
accepting posts. That's why you occasionally find me picking up loose
ends, specifically pointing out the OP won't see the responses unless
Cc'ed. *sigh*
--
char *t=\10pse\0r\0dtu...@ghno\x4e\xc8\x79\xf4\xab\x51\x8a\x10\xf4\xf4\xc4;
main(){ char h,m=h=*t++,*x=t+2*h,c,i,l=*x,s=0; for (i=0;il;i++){ i%8? c=1:
(c=*++x); c128 (s+=h); if (!(h=1)||!t[s+h]){ putchar(t[s]);h=m;s=0; }}}
SA-learn is it a problem
Hi Whenever I run sa-learn it claims to learn from every message regardless of whether its being run immediately after being run on the same folder. Is this normal or is this a problem ? Ben -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/SA-learn-is-it-a-problem-tp25214711p25214711.html Sent from the SpamAssassin - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: SA-learn is it a problem
peperami97 wrote: Hi Whenever I run sa-learn it claims to learn from every message regardless of whether its being run immediately after being run on the same folder. Is this normal or is this a problem ? That would seem to be a problem. It shouldn't relearn from the same message.. are you using SQL based bayes, or the default db_file based bayes? If db_file, is your bayes_seen file being updated when you run sa-learn?
Re: SA-learn is it a problem
On 30/08/2009 20:30, Matt Kettler wrote: peperami97 wrote: Hi Whenever I run sa-learn it claims to learn from every message regardless of whether its being run immediately after being run on the same folder. Is this normal or is this a problem ? That would seem to be a problem. It shouldn't relearn from the same message.. are you using SQL based bayes, or the default db_file based bayes? If db_file, is your bayes_seen file being updated when you run sa-learn? I am using standard db_file based bayes as far as I was aware. I cant find a bayes_seen file anywhere on my system, where should it be ? Ben
Re: SA-learn is it a problem
By default: ~/.spamassassin/bayes_seen (ie: inside the .spamassassin subdierctory of your home directory) I found it I assume. Its in /home/.spamassassin/spamassassin_seen .spamassassin_seen is not getting updated .spamassasin_toks is getting updated Ben
Re: SA-learn is it a problem
Ben Whyte wrote: By default: ~/.spamassassin/bayes_seen (ie: inside the .spamassassin subdierctory of your home directory) I found it I assume. Its in /home/.spamassassin/spamassassin_seen .spamassassin_seen is not getting updated .spamassasin_toks is getting updated Ben Erm. Did someone mess with the bayes_path setting in your configuration? Also, are you running SA as a user whose home directory is just /home (ie: the user named nobody)
Re: Porn-portal spammers
On 29-Aug-2009, at 07:41, Mynabbler wrote: I am getting rather tired from messages spamming porn-portals. They typically originate from hotmail.com, Er, do they really originate from hotmail servers, or are they simply spoofing a hotmail return address? Are you using zen? -- A: You're wrong Q: I've never found that to be true A: Because it make following messages more difficult Q: Why is top-posting evil?
Re: 3.3.0 alpha 2 on production mail servers / clusers ???
On 29-Aug-2009, at 11:47, R-Elists wrote: have many, or any of you folks on the list migrated your production servers to the 3.3.0 alpha 2 or later release? Er.. hopefully no one did this on a production server. Or if they did they are not really understanding 'alpha' and are willing to lose mail, or worse. -- Women like silent men, they think they're listening.
Re: 3.3.0 alpha 2 on production mail servers / clusers ???
On Sun, Aug 30, 2009 at 08:10:23PM -0600, LuKreme wrote: On 29-Aug-2009, at 11:47, R-Elists wrote: have many, or any of you folks on the list migrated your production servers to the 3.3.0 alpha 2 or later release? Er.. hopefully no one did this on a production server. Or if they did they are not really understanding 'alpha' and are willing to lose mail, or worse. How is SA going to lose your mail? I guess I've must lost it a lot since I've been using SVN version in production for thousands of users for a year..
