Re: SA 3.3.0 and sa-compile
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Benny Pedersen a écrit : On tor 01 okt 2009 18:09:38 CEST, to...@starbridge.org wrote thank for your answers. It's done: https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6214 also spamassassin 21 -D -t msg output.log and another time with the plugin disabled shows it work (this time with output.log) add output.log to the ticket it's done -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iEYEARECAAYFAkrFs78ACgkQ8FtMlUNHQIN86QCglgcJCF0r26lWKxWFoosEOT6h qAIAn0B6yUq01LaXSI3RpsbEJDqqZwWb =NKGw -END PGP SIGNATURE-
Re: SA 3.3.0 and sa-compile
I have same problem. Any solution ? Regards Zdenek Herman zdenek.her...@ille.cz tel: 777 730 218 http://www.cistaposta.cz to...@starbridge.org napsal(a): -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi, i'm running SA 3.3.0 (3.3.0-alpha3-r808953) and i've some problem with compiled rules. sa-compile runs without errors, and SA seems to works fine when restarted. But some body rules are now not detected. exemple of simple body rule (for testing): body TONIO_SPAM_TEST/toniospam/i describe TONIO_SPAM_TESTMentions Generic toniospamtest score TONIO_SPAM_TEST 5 if i commented out loadplugin Mail::SpamAssassin::Plugin::Rule2XSBody in v320.pre, body rules is working again. I've tested with SA 3.2.5 and it's working fine with Rule2XSBody active. I've tried to delete compiled rules and compile again: same result. Some info on my environnement: debian testing perl v5.10.0 xsubpp version 2.200401 (from debian perl package) re2c version 0.13.5-1 Thanks for your help Regards Tonio NB: sorry for this second post, but i've made a mistake with the previous one (replying to an other thread) -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iEYEARECAAYFAkrDzE4ACgkQ8FtMlUNHQINOIgCeIgXvgz5VafWgZmeb7RhS3vvo 7ZUAn0+ANE9/uzBbSTcCsn26PGVHlflt =sq17 -END PGP SIGNATURE-
Re: SA 3.3.0 and sa-compile
On Thu, 1 Oct 2009, Zdenek Herman wrote: I have same problem. Any solution ? to...@starbridge.org napsal(a): i'm running SA 3.3.0 (3.3.0-alpha3-r808953) and i've some problem with compiled rules. sa-compile runs without errors, and SA seems to works fine when restarted. But some body rules are now not detected. A suggestion to both of you, based on sa-compile support requests seen earlier on the list: run sa-compile with the debug option turned on, publish the debugging output and intermediate files on a webserver somewhere, and post the URIs for that info here so they can be examined. -- John Hardin KA7OHZhttp://www.impsec.org/~jhardin/ jhar...@impsec.orgFALaholic #11174 pgpk -a jhar...@impsec.org key: 0xB8732E79 -- 2D8C 34F4 6411 F507 136C AF76 D822 E6E6 B873 2E79 --- Therapeutic Phrenologist - send email for affordable rate schedule. --- Approximately 9051420 firearms legally purchased in the U.S. this year
Re: SA 3.3.0 and sa-compile
On Thu, Oct 1, 2009 at 16:15, John Hardin jhar...@impsec.org wrote: On Thu, 1 Oct 2009, Zdenek Herman wrote: I have same problem. Any solution ? to...@starbridge.org napsal(a): i'm running SA 3.3.0 (3.3.0-alpha3-r808953) and i've some problem with compiled rules. sa-compile runs without errors, and SA seems to works fine when restarted. But some body rules are now not detected. A suggestion to both of you, based on sa-compile support requests seen earlier on the list: run sa-compile with the debug option turned on, publish the debugging output and intermediate files on a webserver somewhere, and post the URIs for that info here so they can be examined. even better: open a Bugzilla entry and do the same. That's how we track (possible) bugs and prioritize them. -- --j.
Re: SA 3.3.0 and sa-compile
On Thu, 1 Oct 2009, Justin Mason wrote: On Thu, Oct 1, 2009 at 16:15, John Hardin jhar...@impsec.org wrote: On Thu, 1 Oct 2009, Zdenek Herman wrote: I have same problem. Any solution ? to...@starbridge.org napsal(a): i'm running SA 3.3.0 (3.3.0-alpha3-r808953) and i've some problem with compiled rules. sa-compile runs without errors, and SA seems to works fine when restarted. But some body rules are now not detected. A suggestion to both of you, based on sa-compile support requests seen earlier on the list: run sa-compile with the debug option turned on, publish the debugging output and intermediate files on a webserver somewhere, and post the URIs for that info here so they can be examined. even better: open a Bugzilla entry and do the same. That's how we track (possible) bugs and prioritize them. And the bugzilla entry could have the logs as attachments. I wasn't sure if it was appropriate to open a bug yet, but if Justin suggests it then I guess it is... -- John Hardin KA7OHZhttp://www.impsec.org/~jhardin/ jhar...@impsec.orgFALaholic #11174 pgpk -a jhar...@impsec.org key: 0xB8732E79 -- 2D8C 34F4 6411 F507 136C AF76 D822 E6E6 B873 2E79 --- Therapeutic Phrenologist - send email for affordable rate schedule. --- Approximately 9051420 firearms legally purchased in the U.S. this year
Re: SA 3.3.0 and sa-compile
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Justin Mason a écrit : On Thu, Oct 1, 2009 at 16:15, John Hardin jhar...@impsec.org wrote: On Thu, 1 Oct 2009, Zdenek Herman wrote: I have same problem. Any solution ? to...@starbridge.org napsal(a): i'm running SA 3.3.0 (3.3.0-alpha3-r808953) and i've some problem with compiled rules. sa-compile runs without errors, and SA seems to works fine when restarted. But some body rules are now not detected. A suggestion to both of you, based on sa-compile support requests seen earlier on the list: run sa-compile with the debug option turned on, publish the debugging output and intermediate files on a webserver somewhere, and post the URIs for that info here so they can be examined. even better: open a Bugzilla entry and do the same. That's how we track (possible) bugs and prioritize them. thank for your answers. It's done: https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6214 -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iEYEARECAAYFAkrE1EEACgkQ8FtMlUNHQINOJgCdG7Piu3Phd1Mb2iYl7dmX1pV7 b0UAn1yITwVbWgddDiUlJtdQgCWsb4QL =mPa4 -END PGP SIGNATURE-
Re: SA 3.3.0 and sa-compile
On tor 01 okt 2009 18:09:38 CEST, to...@starbridge.org wrote thank for your answers. It's done: https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6214 also spamassassin 21 -D -t msg output.log and another time with the plugin disabled shows it work (this time with output.log) add output.log to the ticket -- xpoint
SA 3.3.0 and sa-compile
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi, i'm running SA 3.3.0 (3.3.0-alpha3-r808953) and i've some problem with compiled rules. sa-compile runs without errors, and SA seems to works fine when restarted. But some body rules are now not detected. exemple of simple body rule (for testing): body TONIO_SPAM_TEST/toniospam/i describe TONIO_SPAM_TESTMentions Generic toniospamtest score TONIO_SPAM_TEST 5 if i commented out loadplugin Mail::SpamAssassin::Plugin::Rule2XSBody in v320.pre, body rules is working again. I've tested with SA 3.2.5 and it's working fine with Rule2XSBody active. I've tried to delete compiled rules and compile again: same result. Some info on my environnement: debian testing perl v5.10.0 xsubpp version 2.200401 (from debian perl package) re2c version 0.13.5-1 Thanks for your help Regards Tonio NB: sorry for this second post, but i've made a mistake with the previous one (replying to an other thread) -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iEYEARECAAYFAkrDzE4ACgkQ8FtMlUNHQINOIgCeIgXvgz5VafWgZmeb7RhS3vvo 7ZUAn0+ANE9/uzBbSTcCsn26PGVHlflt =sq17 -END PGP SIGNATURE-
Re: 3.3.0 and sa-compile
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 to...@starbridge.org a écrit : to...@starbridge.org a écrit : Benny Pedersen a écrit : On fre 25 sep 2009 13:38:19 CEST, to...@starbridge.org wrote I've tested with SA 3.2.5 and it's working fine with Rule2XSBody active. I've tried to delete compiled rules and compile again: same result. forget to sa-compile in 3.3 ? sa-compile has been run correctly with no errors (even in debug) has anyone encountered the same problem ? nobody ? i really need help on this one thx Regards Tonio -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iEYEARECAAYFAkrBpuIACgkQ8FtMlUNHQINEvwCg27ECYMTslFW1K80srvM5SdB3 YB0AoIytnseU1nW6iqlRasCNTCNFjrQW =tjQR -END PGP SIGNATURE-
Re: 3.3.0 and sa-compile
On Tue, 2009-09-29 at 08:19 +0200, to...@starbridge.org wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 to...@starbridge.org a écrit : to...@starbridge.org a écrit : Benny Pedersen a écrit : On fre 25 sep 2009 13:38:19 CEST, to...@starbridge.org wrote I've tested with SA 3.2.5 and it's working fine with Rule2XSBody active. I've tried to delete compiled rules and compile again: same result. forget to sa-compile in 3.3 ? sa-compile has been run correctly with no errors (even in debug) has anyone encountered the same problem ? Someone posted a problem with perl 5.6. What version of perl are you running? -- Daniel J McDonald, CCIE # 2495, CISSP # 78281, CNX www.austinenergy.com signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Re: 3.3.0 and sa-compile
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 McDonald, Dan a écrit : On Tue, 2009-09-29 at 08:19 +0200, to...@starbridge.org wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 to...@starbridge.org a écrit : to...@starbridge.org a écrit : Benny Pedersen a écrit : On fre 25 sep 2009 13:38:19 CEST, to...@starbridge.org wrote I've tested with SA 3.2.5 and it's working fine with Rule2XSBody active. I've tried to delete compiled rules and compile again: same result. forget to sa-compile in 3.3 ? sa-compile has been run correctly with no errors (even in debug) has anyone encountered the same problem ? Someone posted a problem with perl 5.6. What version of perl are you running? thx for your answer perl v5.10.0 -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iEYEARECAAYFAkrCDtUACgkQ8FtMlUNHQIOPZgCfSY4GphHXEhWNolU7h0pYKcas r8kAn1iP1rtNl9WHYPszFPBrpgpjECqv =ccGX -END PGP SIGNATURE-
Re: 3.3.0 and sa-compile
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 to...@starbridge.org a écrit : Benny Pedersen a écrit : On fre 25 sep 2009 13:38:19 CEST, to...@starbridge.org wrote I've tested with SA 3.2.5 and it's working fine with Rule2XSBody active. I've tried to delete compiled rules and compile again: same result. forget to sa-compile in 3.3 ? sa-compile has been run correctly with no errors (even in debug) has anyone encountered the same problem ? -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iEYEARECAAYFAkq9zccACgkQ8FtMlUNHQIMA4wCeK5STV5P49zdRhMgdy9saHmfq a4oAoNdduS36HIID3G38afVydbgxBhgb =D8Ng -END PGP SIGNATURE-
3.3.0 and sa-compile
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi, i'm running SA 3.3.0 (3.3.0-alpha3-r808953) and i've some problem with compiled rules. sa-compile runs without errors, and SA seems to works fine when restarted. But some body rules are now not detected. exemple of simple body rule (for testing): body TONIO_SPAM_TEST/toniospam/i describe TONIO_SPAM_TESTMentions Generic toniospamtest score TONIO_SPAM_TEST 5 if i commented out loadplugin Mail::SpamAssassin::Plugin::Rule2XSBody in v320.pre, rules is working again. I've tested with SA 3.2.5 and it's working fine with Rule2XSBody active. I've tried to delete compiled rules and compile again: same result. Some info on my environnement: debian testing xsubpp version 2.200401 (from debian perl package) re2c version 0.13.5-1 Thanks for your help Regard Tonio -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iEYEARECAAYFAkq8q6sACgkQ8FtMlUNHQIN9zwCg3s5HNL7DKUBRo8fTLbD6BsqV aWMAoLnDI/+eABGST8KEG5todvABFUSF =aDLE -END PGP SIGNATURE-
Re: 3.3.0 and sa-compile
On fre 25 sep 2009 13:38:19 CEST, to...@starbridge.org wrote I've tested with SA 3.2.5 and it's working fine with Rule2XSBody active. I've tried to delete compiled rules and compile again: same result. forget to sa-compile in 3.3 ? -- xpoint
Re: 3.3.0 and sa-compile
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Benny Pedersen a écrit : On fre 25 sep 2009 13:38:19 CEST, to...@starbridge.org wrote I've tested with SA 3.2.5 and it's working fine with Rule2XSBody active. I've tried to delete compiled rules and compile again: same result. forget to sa-compile in 3.3 ? sa-compile has been run correctly with no errors (even in debug) -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iEYEARECAAYFAkq8syMACgkQ8FtMlUNHQIP2+wCdGgQpUR/MLpHT8hdW+4ooARAP bYIAnRHf2xM7QeUE1HGWirN3OTTovnVW =tO8Q -END PGP SIGNATURE-
Re: 3.3.0 and sa-compile
to...@starbridge.org wrote: Benny Pedersen a écrit : On fre 25 sep 2009 13:38:19 CEST, to...@starbridge.org wrote I've tested with SA 3.2.5 and it's working fine with Rule2XSBody active. I've tried to delete compiled rules and compile again: same result. forget to sa-compile in 3.3 ? sa-compile has been run correctly with no errors (even in debug)
