RE: Fake MX Record(s) Trick

2008-06-25 Thread Robert - elists

 
 mouss is french, you must know ;-)
 

French mouse?

;-)

http://disney.go.com/disneyvideos/animatedfilms/ratatouille/

No offense intended of course... it really was a cute movie...

Time for vacations!

 - rh



Re: Fake MX Record(s) Trick

2008-06-25 Thread Jon Trulson

On Mon, 23 Jun 2008, Marc Perkel wrote:


Marc Ferguson wrote:

Hi,

I'm a linux noob and a spam assassin noob so please reply in simplified 
language.  Thanks. 
I saw on the wiki a trick to use fake mx records in order to weed out spam 
(http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/OtherTricks).  I'm using Evolution at 
home and on my laptop and I have the spamassassin plugin so I'm constantly 
clicking the junk icon.  I have access to my shared web hosting account 
and I sure do get TONS of spam.  I'm a bit confused as to how to implement 
it though.  My web host uses WHM so my form looks something like this:


digitalalias.net http://digitalalias.net  14400  IN  MX  0 
digitalalias.net http://digitalalias.net


What is 14400, I'm guessing a port of some kind.  Besides that the wiki 
suggests that my first fake mx record should be set at 10, then my real mx 
record at 20, and then another fake one at 30.  Why is this since my 
current mx record is set to 0?


fake0.example.com http://fake0.example.com 10
realmx.example.com http://realmx.example.com 20
fake1.example.com http://fake1.example.com 30


Hi Marc,

I'm the guy who invented the trick and yes it does work. I'm running it with


  No you aren't.

more that 4000 domains and it gets rid of more than half my spam without 
having to use spamassassin. I use SA too but it's very expensive to run and 
anything that reduces it will cut your server load.


I'm also providing a public server to harvest fake MX info to help build my 
blacklist. You can use this host for your fake high numbered MX. (Not a low 
numbered MX though)




  Que the spamvertising...


mail.yourdomain.com  10
tarbaby.junkemailfilter.com 20





--
Happy cheese in fear | Jon Trulson
against oppressor, rebel!| mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Brocolli, hostage.   -Unknown| #include std/disclaimer.h


Re: Fake MX Record(s) Trick

2008-06-25 Thread mouss

Robert - elists wrote:

mouss is french, you must know ;-)




French mouse?
  


mousse means foam. Franciscaner weiss?


;-)

http://disney.go.com/disneyvideos/animatedfilms/ratatouille/

No offense intended of course... it really was a cute movie...
  


I loved it.

Time for vacations!
  


oh yeah. Barcelona, Estoy viniendo.




Re: Fake MX Record(s) Trick

2008-06-24 Thread Michael Monnerie
On Dienstag, 24. Juni 2008 Benny Pedersen wrote:
  14400 is 4 hours (4*3660) which is a bit low for an MX 86400
  (24 hours) is probably better.

 nice calc for 4 hours :-)

mouss is french, you must know ;-)

mfg zmi
-- 
// Michael Monnerie, Ing.BSc-  http://it-management.at
// Tel: 0660 / 415 65 31  .network.your.ideas.
// PGP Key: curl -s http://zmi.at/zmi.asc | gpg --import
// Fingerprint: AC19 F9D5 36ED CD8A EF38  500E CE14 91F7 1C12 09B4
// Keyserver: www.keyserver.net   Key-ID: 1C1209B4


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.


Re: Fake MX Record(s) Trick

2008-06-24 Thread mouss

Michael Monnerie wrote:

On Dienstag, 24. Juni 2008 Benny Pedersen wrote:
  

14400 is 4 hours (4*3660) which is a bit low for an MX 86400
(24 hours) is probably better.
  

nice calc for 4 hours :-)



mouss is french, you must know ;-)
  


yep. I have problems with anything but the metric system :-)  (which 
doesn't mean I don't have problem with the metric system as well...).




Fake MX Record(s) Trick

2008-06-23 Thread Marc Ferguson
Hi,

I'm a linux noob and a spam assassin noob so please reply in simplified
language.  Thanks.

I saw on the wiki a trick to use fake mx records in order to weed out spam (
http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/OtherTricks).  I'm using Evolution at
home and on my laptop and I have the spamassassin plugin so I'm constantly
clicking the junk icon.  I have access to my shared web hosting account
and I sure do get TONS of spam.  I'm a bit confused as to how to implement
it though.  My web host uses WHM so my form looks something like this:

digitalalias.net  14400  IN  MX  0  digitalalias.net

What is 14400, I'm guessing a port of some kind.  Besides that the wiki
suggests that my first fake mx record should be set at 10, then my real mx
record at 20, and then another fake one at 30.  Why is this since my current
mx record is set to 0?

fake0.example.com 10
realmx.example.com 20
fake1.example.com 30


Marc F.

..Grace to you and peace from Him who is and who was and who is to come..
-Rev1:4


Re: Fake MX Record(s) Trick

2008-06-23 Thread Matus UHLAR - fantomas
On 20.06.08 10:38, Marc Ferguson wrote:
 I'm a linux noob and a spam assassin noob so please reply in simplified
 language.  Thanks.
 
 I saw on the wiki a trick to use fake mx records in order to weed out spam (
 http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/OtherTricks).  I'm using Evolution at
 home and on my laptop and I have the spamassassin plugin so I'm constantly
 clicking the junk icon.  I have access to my shared web hosting account
 and I sure do get TONS of spam.  I'm a bit confused as to how to implement
 it though.  My web host uses WHM so my form looks something like this:
 
 digitalalias.net  14400  IN  MX  0  digitalalias.net
 
 What is 14400, I'm guessing a port of some kind.

it's a TTL of the recotrd. ALL MX ex should have equal TTL, if others don't
have any explicitly specified (BIND takes it from other info), don't specify
this.

 Besides that the wiki suggests that my first fake mx record should be set
 at 10, then my real mx record at 20, and then another fake one at 30.  Why
 is this since my current mx record is set to 0?

The numbers is irelevant, only the order is. 0-1-2 will have the same effect
as 10-20-30 or 10-95-100.


-- 
Matus UHLAR - fantomas, [EMAIL PROTECTED] ; http://www.fantomas.sk/
Warning: I wish NOT to receive e-mail advertising to this address.
Varovanie: na tuto adresu chcem NEDOSTAVAT akukolvek reklamnu postu.
Posli tento mail 100 svojim znamim - nech vidia aky si idiot
Send this email to 100 your friends - let them see what an idiot you are


Re: Fake MX Record(s) Trick

2008-06-23 Thread McDonald, Dan
On Fri, 2008-06-20 at 10:38 -0400, Marc Ferguson wrote:
 Hi,

 I saw on the wiki a trick to use fake mx records in order to weed out
 spam (http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/OtherTricks).  I'm using
 Evolution at home and on my laptop and I have the spamassassin plugin
 so I'm constantly clicking the junk icon.  I have access to my
 shared web hosting account and I sure do get TONS of spam.  I'm a bit
 confused as to how to implement it though.  My web host uses WHM so my
 form looks something like this:
 
 digitalalias.net  14400  IN  MX  0  digitalalias.net
 
 What is 14400, 

The time-to-live.  It tells the world how often (in seconds) they should
check back to see if this record has changed.  You are telling people to
check once every 4 hours.

 I'm guessing a port of some kind.  Besides that the wiki suggests that
 my first fake mx record should be set at 10, then my real mx record at
 20, and then another fake one at 30.  Why is this since my current mx
 record is set to 0?

Lowest number wins, so to attempt this trick you would need to change
your current MX to be some number larger than zero so that a fake MX
could be inserted lower.

But I'm not convinced that twiddling with fake MX records will reduce
your spam level any.
-- 
Daniel J McDonald, CCIE #2495, CISSP #78281, CNX
Austin Energy
http://www.austinenergy.com



signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


Re: Fake MX Record(s) Trick

2008-06-23 Thread Alex Woick

Marc Ferguson schrieb am 20.06.2008 16:38:

I saw on the wiki a trick to use fake mx records in order to weed out 
spam (http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/OtherTricks).  I'm using 
Evolution at home and on my laptop and I have the spamassassin plugin so 
I'm constantly clicking the junk icon.  I have access to my shared web 
hosting account and I sure do get TONS of spam.  I'm a bit confused as 
to how to implement it though.


If you don't exactly know what you are doing, don't fiddle with your MX 
entries. Correctly set up, SpamAssassin is 99.9% accurate even without 
such special tweaks. With 99.9% I mean that for every 1000 spam I get, 
at most 1 is not detected.


You might have not understood how SpamAssassin works: it simply marks 
spam as spam, but passes it through into your inbox like any other mail. 
It is an additional task for you to set up in your mail client or in 
your mail delivery agent to move marked spam away to some kind of junk 
folder. SpamAssassin marks found spam with the X-Spam-Flag: YES header.


Tschau
Alex


Re: Fake MX Record(s) Trick

2008-06-23 Thread John Hardin

On Mon, 23 Jun 2008, McDonald, Dan wrote:

But I'm not convinced that twiddling with fake MX records will reduce 
your spam level any.


Cue Mr. Perkel... :)

--
 John Hardin KA7OHZhttp://www.impsec.org/~jhardin/
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]FALaholic #11174 pgpk -a [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 key: 0xB8732E79 -- 2D8C 34F4 6411 F507 136C  AF76 D822 E6E6 B873 2E79
---
  The problem is when people look at Yahoo, slashdot, or groklaw and
  jump from obvious and correct observations like Oh my God, this
  place is teeming with utter morons to incorrect conclusions like
  there's nothing of value here.-- Al Petrofsky, in Y! SCOX
---
 11 days until the 232nd anniversary of the Declaration of Independence


Re: Fake MX Record(s) Trick

2008-06-23 Thread Diego Pomatta

Marc Ferguson escribió:

Hi,

I'm a linux noob and a spam assassin noob so please reply in 
simplified language.  Thanks. 

I saw on the wiki a trick to use fake mx records in order to weed out 
spam (http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/OtherTricks).  I'm using 
Evolution at home and on my laptop and I have the spamassassin plugin 
so I'm constantly clicking the junk icon.  I have access to my 
shared web hosting account and I sure do get TONS of spam.  I'm a bit 
confused as to how to implement it though.  My web host uses WHM so my 
form looks something like this:


digitalalias.net http://digitalalias.net  14400  IN  MX  0  
digitalalias.net http://digitalalias.net


What is 14400, I'm guessing a port of some kind.  Besides that the 
wiki suggests that my first fake mx record should be set at 10, then 
my real mx record at 20, and then another fake one at 30.  Why is this 
since my current mx record is set to 0?


fake0.example.com http://fake0.example.com 10
realmx.example.com http://realmx.example.com 20
fake1.example.com http://fake1.example.com 30

Hey Marc.
That is a variation or extension of a technique known as nolisting, 
which consists on making your primary MX record point to an IP which 
does not accept SMTP connections (i.e. a fake). In this case, the MX 
with the lowest priority is also a made a fake because spammers tend to 
target the lowest priority mail server directly (a spammer breaking the 
rules, imagine that!) to avoid the usually tighter security of the 
primary mail server.



From http://nolisting.org/:
Nolisting requires privileges that are only available to administrators. 
It is not configurable by end users. To configure Nolisting, an 
administrator must have the following:


   * the ability create MX records for the destination domain
   * a spare /public/ IP address, within the administrator's control,
 that has no listening service running on SMTP port 25
   * cooperation of all staff with administrative control over related
 network resources
   * optionally, a packet filter on the IP address specified as the
 primary MX (recommended)


In my opinion this trick sucks for many reasons, two mainly: First, 
legitimate mail senders lose time and sometimes lose mails (for example 
unpatched RFC-compliant qmail servers).
Second, it's pointless, spammers are already adapting. All they have to 
do is try all mx records. So du'h.


Besides, having fake mx records in your DNS makes *you* non 
RFC-compliant. ;)


Regards
/Diego






Re: Fake MX Record(s) Trick

2008-06-23 Thread Marc Perkel

Marc Ferguson wrote:

Hi,

I'm a linux noob and a spam assassin noob so please reply in 
simplified language.  Thanks. 

I saw on the wiki a trick to use fake mx records in order to weed out 
spam (http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/OtherTricks).  I'm using 
Evolution at home and on my laptop and I have the spamassassin plugin 
so I'm constantly clicking the junk icon.  I have access to my 
shared web hosting account and I sure do get TONS of spam.  I'm a bit 
confused as to how to implement it though.  My web host uses WHM so my 
form looks something like this:


digitalalias.net http://digitalalias.net  14400  IN  MX  0  
digitalalias.net http://digitalalias.net


What is 14400, I'm guessing a port of some kind.  Besides that the 
wiki suggests that my first fake mx record should be set at 10, then 
my real mx record at 20, and then another fake one at 30.  Why is this 
since my current mx record is set to 0?


fake0.example.com http://fake0.example.com 10
realmx.example.com http://realmx.example.com 20
fake1.example.com http://fake1.example.com 30


Hi Marc,

I'm the guy who invented the trick and yes it does work. I'm running it 
with more that 4000 domains and it gets rid of more than half my spam 
without having to use spamassassin. I use SA too but it's very expensive 
to run and anything that reduces it will cut your server load.


I'm also providing a public server to harvest fake MX info to help build 
my blacklist. You can use this host for your fake high numbered MX. (Not 
a low numbered MX though)


mail.yourdomain.com  10
tarbaby.junkemailfilter.com 20




Re: Fake MX Record(s) Trick

2008-06-23 Thread mouss

Marc Perkel wrote:

Marc Ferguson wrote:

Hi,

I'm a linux noob and a spam assassin noob so please reply in 
simplified language.  Thanks.
I saw on the wiki a trick to use fake mx records in order to weed out 
spam (http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/OtherTricks).  I'm using 
Evolution at home and on my laptop and I have the spamassassin plugin 
so I'm constantly clicking the junk icon.  I have access to my 
shared web hosting account and I sure do get TONS of spam.  I'm a bit 
confused as to how to implement it though.  My web host uses WHM so 
my form looks something like this:


digitalalias.net http://digitalalias.net  14400  IN  MX  0  
digitalalias.net http://digitalalias.net


What is 14400, I'm guessing a port of some kind.  Besides that the 
wiki suggests that my first fake mx record should be set at 10, then 
my real mx record at 20, and then another fake one at 30.  Why is 
this since my current mx record is set to 0?


fake0.example.com http://fake0.example.com 10
realmx.example.com http://realmx.example.com 20
fake1.example.com http://fake1.example.com 30


Hi Marc,

I'm the guy who invented the trick and yes it does work.


ahuh? do you have references for this claimed invention?

I'm running it with more that 4000 domains and it gets rid of more 
than half my spam without having to use spamassassin. I use SA too but 
it's very expensive to run and anything that reduces it will cut your 
server load.


I'm also providing a public server to harvest fake MX info to help 
build my blacklist. You can use this host for your fake high numbered 
MX. (Not a low numbered MX though)


mail.yourdomain.com  10
tarbaby.junkemailfilter.com 20







Re: Fake MX Record(s) Trick

2008-06-23 Thread mouss

Marc Ferguson wrote:

Hi,

I'm a linux noob and a spam assassin noob so please reply in simplified
language.  Thanks.

I saw on the wiki a trick to use fake mx records in order to weed out spam (
http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/OtherTricks).  I'm using Evolution at
home and on my laptop and I have the spamassassin plugin so I'm constantly
clicking the junk icon.  I have access to my shared web hosting account
and I sure do get TONS of spam.  I'm a bit confused as to how to implement
it though.  My web host uses WHM so my form looks something like this:

digitalalias.net  14400  IN  MX  0  digitalalias.net

What is 14400, I'm guessing a port of some kind.


nice try :)  it's an (optional) TTL.
   http://www.zytrax.com/books/dns/

14400 is 4 hours (4*3660) which is a bit low for an MX 86400 (24 
hours) is probably better.



  Besides that the wiki
suggests that my first fake mx record should be set at 10, then my real mx
record at 20, and then another fake one at 30. 


at this stage, I would recommend that you forget about MX tricks and 
focus on more straightforward measures. tune your SA first. only when 
you're happy and you've learnt enough about MXes should you try such road.

 Why is this since my current
mx record is set to 0?
  


only the order counts. (10, 20, 30) is the same as (100, 500, 900).


fake0.example.com 10
realmx.example.com 20
fake1.example.com 30


Marc F.

..Grace to you and peace from Him who is and who was and who is to come..
  


Peace to this world... (once wev'e exterminated spammers ;-p)

-Rev1:4

  




Re: Fake MX Record(s) Trick

2008-06-23 Thread Benny Pedersen

On Mon, June 23, 2008 21:27, mouss wrote:

 14400 is 4 hours (4*3660) which is a bit low for an MX 86400 (24
 hours) is probably better.

nice calc for 4 hours :-)


Benny Pedersen
Need more webspace ? http://www.servage.net/?coupon=cust37098