bayes before spamassassin?
Hi List
It is possible that each incoming mail goes first to bayes and later to
spamassassin?
Do you think that this procedure is good?
__
(Incoming mail) -- | (bayes) |(yes)(delete it)
| it's spam?|
|__|
(no, goes to)
|
|
|
(spamassassin)-(move the message
to folder /mailbox_user/.spam )
I've attached the textart anyway if you can't see it
How do I do it?
Thanks
JeAn
begin 666 textArtProcedure.txt
[EMAIL PROTECTED]5X=%R= T*#0H@( @( @( @( @( @( @( @(!?7U]?7U]?
M7U]?7U]?#0HH26YC;VUI;F@;6%I;[EMAIL PROTECTED]/B!\(AB87EERD@(!\
M#0H@( @( @( @( @( @( @( @(!\(ET)W,@W!A;3]\*'EERDM
M+2TM/BAD96QE=4@:70I#0H@( @( @( @( @( @( @( @(!\7U]?
M7U]?7U]?7U]\#0H@( @( @( @( @( @( @( @( H;F\L(=O97,@
M=\I#0H@( @( @( @( @( @( @( @( @( @(!\#0H@( @( @
M( @( @( @( @( @( @( @(!\#0H@( @( @( @( @( @( @
M( @( @( @(!\#0H@( @( @( @( @( @( @( @( HW!A;6%S
MV%SVEN*2TM+2TM/BAM;W9E('1H92!M97-S86=E('1O(9O;1EB O;6%I
5;)O%]UV5R+RYS%M(D-@T*
`
end
__
LLama Gratis a cualquier PC del Mundo.
Llamadas a fijos y móviles desde 1 céntimo por minuto.
http://es.voice.yahoo.com
Re: bayes before spamassassin?
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi List It is possible that each incoming mail goes first to bayes and later to spamassassin? Do you think that this procedure is good? __ (Incoming mail) -- | (bayes) |(yes)(delete it) | it's spam?| |__| (no, goes to) | | | (spamassassin)-(move the message to folder /mailbox_user/.spam ) I've attached the textart anyway if you can't see it How do I do it? You could do that, but you'd have to use a separate bayes-only spam tool. At that point, why bother? SA has it's own bayes system that it will run when the message is fed to SA.
Re: bayes before spamassassin?
Matt Kettler writes: [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi List It is possible that each incoming mail goes first to bayes and later to spamassassin? Do you think that this procedure is good? __ (Incoming mail) -- | (bayes) |(yes)(delete it) | it's spam?| |__| (no, goes to) | | | (spamassassin)-(move the message to folder /mailbox_user/.spam ) I've attached the textart anyway if you can't see it How do I do it? You could do that, but you'd have to use a separate bayes-only spam tool. At that point, why bother? SA has it's own bayes system that it will run when the message is fed to SA. in SpamAssassin 3.2.0, you'll be able to do it with SpamAssassin's bayes -- short-circuit to spam with a high score if BAYES_99 hits, for example. --j.
Re: bayes before spamassassin?
I mean, I want the sa-learn examine the message before the spamassassin and then goes to spamassassin The reasons for that: -I think the incoming mail maybe a spam, but this is relative because the concept to spam for an user is not equal to another one ( I have many users on my domain ) -At the next time the incoming message like the last one could be processed like spam by spamassassin -If the sa-learn determine it's spam the message will be deleted --else, the message goes to spamassassin, -The spamassassin mark the message spam or not spam --if spam put it on the folder /mailbox/.spam --else put it on the inbox and the user can define if this is spam or not according to his own criteria JeAn - Original Message - From: Matt Kettler [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: spam lista users@spamassassin.apache.org Sent: Friday, November 17, 2006 1:00 PM Subject: Re: bayes before spamassassin? [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi List It is possible that each incoming mail goes first to bayes and later to spamassassin? Do you think that this procedure is good? __ (Incoming mail) -- | (bayes) |(yes)(delete it) | it's spam?| |__| (no, goes to) | | | (spamassassin)-(move the message to folder /mailbox_user/.spam ) I've attached the textart anyway if you can't see it How do I do it? You could do that, but you'd have to use a separate bayes-only spam tool. At that point, why bother? SA has it's own bayes system that it will run when the message is fed to SA. __ LLama Gratis a cualquier PC del Mundo. Llamadas a fijos y móviles desde 1 céntimo por minuto. http://es.voice.yahoo.com
Re: bayes before spamassassin?
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I mean, I want the sa-learn examine the message before the spamassassin and then goes to spamassassin snip -If the sa-learn determine it's spam the message will be deleted But there's the problem. sa-learn doesn't determine if a message is spam or not. In fact, you have to explicitly tell it if the message is spam or not. sa-learn isn't a bayes evaluator. It's a bayes trainer.
