Re: clarification on "Correct error in fix for 49683"
On 09/02/2012 23:42, Janne Jalkanen wrote: > > Just to confirm - 7.0.25 seems to solve the problem for the most part. "Most part"? So there is still a leak? p > /Janne > > On 24 Jan 2012, at 10:53, Janne Jalkanen wrote: > >> >> Been running 7.0.25 in production now for a day and the fd leak seems at >> least mitigated somewhat. lsof still lists a few open sockets left by >> Tomcat, but this is less than what 7.0.23/.22 was doing. I will continue to >> run this a bit further and report back in a day or two whether the situation >> is getting worse. >> >> java 4086 ubuntu 10u sock0,6 0t0 73725644 >> can't identify protocol >> java 4086 ubuntu 59u sock0,6 0t0 77721715 >> can't identify protocol >> java 4086 ubuntu 96u sock0,6 0t0 77721057 >> can't identify protocol >> java 4086 ubuntu 108u sock0,6 0t0 77723538 >> can't identify protocol >> java 4086 ubuntu 119u sock0,6 0t0 77722327 >> can't identify protocol >> java 4086 ubuntu 132u sock0,6 0t0 77724248 >> can't identify protocol >> java 4086 ubuntu 134u sock0,6 0t0 77723129 >> can't identify protocol >> >> >> /Janne >> >> On 21 Jan 2012, at 23:19, Mike Wertheim wrote: >> >>> The change log for Tomcat 7.0.25 contains this entry: >>> "Correct error in fix for 49683. (markt)" >>> >>> Is this bug fix expected to fix the file descriptor leak that was >>> reported in Tomcat 7.0.23? >>> >>> - >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org >>> For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tomcat.apache.org >> >> >> - >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org >> For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tomcat.apache.org > > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tomcat.apache.org > signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: clarification on "Correct error in fix for 49683"
Just to confirm - 7.0.25 seems to solve the problem for the most part. /Janne On 24 Jan 2012, at 10:53, Janne Jalkanen wrote: > > Been running 7.0.25 in production now for a day and the fd leak seems at > least mitigated somewhat. lsof still lists a few open sockets left by > Tomcat, but this is less than what 7.0.23/.22 was doing. I will continue to > run this a bit further and report back in a day or two whether the situation > is getting worse. > > java 4086 ubuntu 10u sock0,6 0t0 73725644 > can't identify protocol > java 4086 ubuntu 59u sock0,6 0t0 77721715 > can't identify protocol > java 4086 ubuntu 96u sock0,6 0t0 77721057 > can't identify protocol > java 4086 ubuntu 108u sock0,6 0t0 77723538 > can't identify protocol > java 4086 ubuntu 119u sock0,6 0t0 77722327 > can't identify protocol > java 4086 ubuntu 132u sock0,6 0t0 77724248 > can't identify protocol > java 4086 ubuntu 134u sock0,6 0t0 77723129 > can't identify protocol > > > /Janne > > On 21 Jan 2012, at 23:19, Mike Wertheim wrote: > >> The change log for Tomcat 7.0.25 contains this entry: >> "Correct error in fix for 49683. (markt)" >> >> Is this bug fix expected to fix the file descriptor leak that was >> reported in Tomcat 7.0.23? >> >> - >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org >> For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tomcat.apache.org > > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tomcat.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tomcat.apache.org
Re: clarification on "Correct error in fix for 49683"
Been running 7.0.25 in production now for a day and the fd leak seems at least mitigated somewhat. lsof still lists a few open sockets left by Tomcat, but this is less than what 7.0.23/.22 was doing. I will continue to run this a bit further and report back in a day or two whether the situation is getting worse. java 4086 ubuntu 10u sock0,6 0t0 73725644 can't identify protocol java 4086 ubuntu 59u sock0,6 0t0 77721715 can't identify protocol java 4086 ubuntu 96u sock0,6 0t0 77721057 can't identify protocol java 4086 ubuntu 108u sock0,6 0t0 77723538 can't identify protocol java 4086 ubuntu 119u sock0,6 0t0 77722327 can't identify protocol java 4086 ubuntu 132u sock0,6 0t0 77724248 can't identify protocol java 4086 ubuntu 134u sock0,6 0t0 77723129 can't identify protocol /Janne On 21 Jan 2012, at 23:19, Mike Wertheim wrote: > The change log for Tomcat 7.0.25 contains this entry: > "Correct error in fix for 49683. (markt)" > > Is this bug fix expected to fix the file descriptor leak that was > reported in Tomcat 7.0.23? > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tomcat.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tomcat.apache.org
clarification on "Correct error in fix for 49683"
The change log for Tomcat 7.0.25 contains this entry: "Correct error in fix for 49683. (markt)" Is this bug fix expected to fix the file descriptor leak that was reported in Tomcat 7.0.23? - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tomcat.apache.org
