ListChoice gets updated BEFORE onSubmit is called
Hello, I'm very new to wicket so this may be a duh situation, but here's
what I'm trying to do:
I have a form that shows you a ChoiceList of things. You can select one and
then hit the submit button to delete that item. I've written this
functionality but found that it doesn't work the way I want. For some
reason, Wicket asks the ChoiceList for its list BEFORE the form's onSumbit
is called. As a result, the page gets the list before the item is deleted.
And as a result of that, the item is still in the list even though it's been
removed from the database. If I refresh my browser, the item disappears.
So, my question is, how do I get the ChoiceList to ask for its list AFTER
the form's onSubmit is called? Here's my code (note that I'm extending
ChoiceList, but I don't think I'm overriding any related functionality):
//the choicelist
public class WorldChoiceList extends ListChoice {
@SpringBean
private WorldService worldService;
public WorldChoiceList(String id, IModel model) {
super(id);
setChoices(new LoadableDetachableModel() {
protected Object load() {
return worldService.allByName();
}
});
setChoiceRenderer(new IChoiceRenderer() {
public Object getDisplayValue(Object object) {
World w = ((World) object);
return w.getName() + , + w.getMaxX() + , + w.getMaxY();
}
public String getIdValue(Object object, int index) {
if (object.equals()) {
return ;
}
return String.valueOf(((World) object).getWorldId());
}
});
setModel(model);
setNullValid(false);
}
/**
* This override makes it so that the List does not start with a blank
or a Choose One
* label.
* @param selected The selected object
* @return
*/
protected CharSequence getDefaultChoice(final Object selected) {
return ;
}
}
//the web page
public class AdminHome extends AdminPage {
@SpringBean
private WorldService worldService;
private World selected;
public AdminHome() {
add(new FeedbackPanel(feedback));
Form form = new Form(form) {
public void onSubmit() {
if (selected != null)
worldService.deleteWorld(selected);
}
};
form.add(new WorldChoiceList(worldList, new Model() {
public void setObject(final Object object) {
selected = (World) object;
}
}));
add(form);
add(new BookmarkablePageLink(createWorld, CreateWorld.class));
}
}
Thanks for any help :-)
Re: ListChoice gets updated BEFORE onSubmit is called
It has to get the list, because thats where the selected object comes
from. What you need to do is remove the object through that list or
call detach on the choice in the submit. That should also result in
the list being detached/cleared.
On 12/16/07, Dan Kaplan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello, I'm very new to wicket so this may be a duh situation, but here's
what I'm trying to do:
I have a form that shows you a ChoiceList of things. You can select one and
then hit the submit button to delete that item. I've written this
functionality but found that it doesn't work the way I want. For some
reason, Wicket asks the ChoiceList for its list BEFORE the form's onSumbit
is called. As a result, the page gets the list before the item is deleted.
And as a result of that, the item is still in the list even though it's been
removed from the database. If I refresh my browser, the item disappears.
So, my question is, how do I get the ChoiceList to ask for its list AFTER
the form's onSubmit is called? Here's my code (note that I'm extending
ChoiceList, but I don't think I'm overriding any related functionality):
//the choicelist
public class WorldChoiceList extends ListChoice {
@SpringBean
private WorldService worldService;
public WorldChoiceList(String id, IModel model) {
super(id);
setChoices(new LoadableDetachableModel() {
protected Object load() {
return worldService.allByName();
}
});
setChoiceRenderer(new IChoiceRenderer() {
public Object getDisplayValue(Object object) {
World w = ((World) object);
return w.getName() + , + w.getMaxX() + , + w.getMaxY();
}
public String getIdValue(Object object, int index) {
if (object.equals()) {
return ;
}
return String.valueOf(((World) object).getWorldId());
}
});
setModel(model);
setNullValid(false);
}
/**
* This override makes it so that the List does not start with a blank
or a Choose One
* label.
* @param selected The selected object
* @return
*/
protected CharSequence getDefaultChoice(final Object selected) {
return ;
}
}
//the web page
public class AdminHome extends AdminPage {
@SpringBean
private WorldService worldService;
private World selected;
public AdminHome() {
add(new FeedbackPanel(feedback));
Form form = new Form(form) {
public void onSubmit() {
if (selected != null)
worldService.deleteWorld(selected);
}
};
form.add(new WorldChoiceList(worldList, new Model() {
public void setObject(final Object object) {
selected = (World) object;
}
}));
add(form);
add(new BookmarkablePageLink(createWorld, CreateWorld.class));
}
}
Thanks for any help :-)
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
WYMeditor / Ajax - Adding Javascript References to Header
Hello all,
I'm trying to put together a Wicket component for WYMeditor (http://www.wymeditor.org/en/)
as an alternative to TinyMCE. If you haven't seen WYMeditor itself
before, check out the demo at http://demo.wymeditor.org/demo.html.
WYMeditor is dual-licensed under GPL and MIT.
After spending all day screwing around with _javascript_ references and
Firebug, though, it's now time to give up and ask for help. Everything
works fine up until I try to add this Ajax behavior to the page during
an Ajax event. Then, things get screwy. Here's what I have now:
public class WymEditorConverter extends AbstractDefaultAjaxBehavior
{
private static final String FILE_JS_JQUERY_PACKED =
"jquery/jquery-1.1.3.1.pack.js";
private static final String FILE_JS_JQUERY_PRETTY =
"jquery/jquery-1.1.3.1.js";
private static final String FILE_JS_WYMEDITOR_PACKED =
"jquery.wymeditor.pack.js";
private static final String FILE_JS_WYMEDITOR_PRETTY =
"jquery.wymeditor.js";
private static final String FILE_JS_WYMEDITOR_AJAX =
"jquery.wymeditor-ajax.js";
private static final String JS_UPDATE_EDITORS =
"wymUninitialize();";
/* Snip ... */
/**
* @see
org.apache.wicket.ajax.AbstractDefaultAjaxBehavior#respond(org.apache.wicket.ajax.AjaxRequestTarget)
*/
@Override
protected void respond(AjaxRequestTarget target)
{
}
/**
* @see
org.apache.wicket.ajax.AbstractDefaultAjaxBehavior#renderHead(org.apache.wicket.markup.html.IHeaderResponse)
*/
@Override
public void renderHead(IHeaderResponse response)
{
super.renderHead(response);
// Add a reference for the jQuery _javascript_ file
ResourceReference jsJquery = null;
if
(Application.get().getConfigurationType().equals(Application.DEPLOYMENT))
jsJquery = new CompressedResourceReference(Marker.class,
FILE_JS_JQUERY_PACKED);
else
jsJquery = new CompressedResourceReference(Marker.class,
FILE_JS_JQUERY_PRETTY);
renderJsReference(response, jsJquery);
// response.renderJavascriptReference(jsJquery);
// Add a reference for the WYMeditor _javascript_ file
ResourceReference jsWymeditor = null;
if
(Application.get().getConfigurationType().equals(Application.DEPLOYMENT))
jsWymeditor = new CompressedResourceReference(Marker.class,
FILE_JS_WYMEDITOR_PACKED);
else
jsWymeditor = new CompressedResourceReference(Marker.class,
FILE_JS_WYMEDITOR_PRETTY);
renderJsReference(response, jsWymeditor);
// response.renderJavascriptReference(jsWymeditor);
// Add a reference for the WYMeditor-ajax _javascript_ file
ResourceReference jsWymeditorAjax = new
CompressedResourceReference(Marker.class,
FILE_JS_WYMEDITOR_AJAX);
// renderJsReference(response, jsWymeditorAjax);
response.renderJavascriptReference(jsWymeditorAjax);
// Add a reference for the CSS skin
response.renderCSSReference(options.getSkin());
// Add the WYMeditor init block
response.renderOnLoadJavascript(getConversionJavascript());
// Add in references for all of the plugin's _javascript_ files
for (Plugin plugin : this.options.getPlugins())
//
response.renderJavascriptReference(plugin.getPluginJavascript());
renderJsReference(response, plugin.getPluginJavascript());
}
private static void renderJsReference(IHeaderResponse response,
ResourceReference reference)
{
if (RequestCycle.get().getRequestTarget() instanceof
AjaxRequestTarget)
{
StringBuilder importBuilder = new StringBuilder();
importBuilder.append("var script =
document.createElement('script');\n");
// importBuilder.append("script.id='tinyMCEScript';\n");
importBuilder.append("script.src='';\n");
importBuilder.append("script.type='text/_javascript_';\n");
importBuilder.append("document.getElementsByTagName('head')[0].appendChild(script);\n");
response.renderOnDomReadyJavascript(importBuilder.toString());
}
else
response.renderJavascriptReference(reference);
}
/**
* Returns the _javascript_ that is run to convert elements into
WYMeditors. This is made publically
* accessible so that this _javascript_ can be run again, as
necessary, if elements are added to the page
* via Ajax.
*
* @return the _javascript_ that is run to convert elements into
WYMeditors
* @see AjaxRequestTarget#appendJavascript(String)
*/
private String getConversionJavascript()
{
StringBuilder editorInitJs = new StringBuilder();
// editorInitJs.append("jQuery(function() {");
// editorInitJs.append(JS_UPDATE_EDITORS);
editorInitJs.append(" jQuery('" +
conversionSelector.getJquerySelector() + "').wymeditor({");
editorInitJs.append(options.renderOptions());
editorInitJs.append(" });");
// editorInitJs.append("});");
return editorInitJs.toString();
}
}
Here's the jquery.wymeditor-ajax.js file; it's just got one function
that's used when adding WYMeditors via Ajax:
function wymUninitialize() {
for(var i=0; i WYM_INSTANCES.length; i++)
{
WYM_INSTANCES[i].update();
}
WYM_INSTANCES = null;
WYM_INSTANCES = new Array();
}
I have a couple of questions about this whole
Re: Suckerfish dropdowns for wicket
Hi Tames, It worked when I upgraded from wicket 1.2.6 to 1.3 and showed no error. Would you please suggest me what change should I make in your code, so that I would have no links in the topMenuItems. thanks. Tames wrote: Hello. I created the example (using Eclipse with MyEclipse plugin) and got no such error. I did however, put in all the generics of MenuItem where needed (List, ArrayList, etc). Also, you have to add all of the various imports from org.apache.wicket, create your own MyFirstPage and MySecondPage classes. Exported to Tomcat, and all worked fine. topMenuItems is a Java ArrayList object - no magic there. I am using java version 1.6.0 tsuresh wrote: Dear wicketeers Has any one tried Suckerfish dropdowns in wicket. I saw one examle of it in http://javathoughts.capesugarbird.com/2007/11/suckerfish-dropdowns-for-wicket.html I tried to run the example but some error was shown with the message no get method for topMenuItems. Can some one please solve the problem and comment. thanks -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Suckerfish-dropdowns-for-wicket-tp14208480p14360384.html Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: ListChoice gets updated BEFORE onSubmit is called
Oh ok. I didn't think about solving the problem with that approach. Thanks
-Original Message-
From: Johan Compagner [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, December 16, 2007 2:10 AM
To: users@wicket.apache.org
Subject: Re: ListChoice gets updated BEFORE onSubmit is called
It has to get the list, because thats where the selected object comes
from. What you need to do is remove the object through that list or
call detach on the choice in the submit. That should also result in
the list being detached/cleared.
On 12/16/07, Dan Kaplan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello, I'm very new to wicket so this may be a duh situation, but here's
what I'm trying to do:
I have a form that shows you a ChoiceList of things. You can select one
and
then hit the submit button to delete that item. I've written this
functionality but found that it doesn't work the way I want. For some
reason, Wicket asks the ChoiceList for its list BEFORE the form's onSumbit
is called. As a result, the page gets the list before the item is
deleted.
And as a result of that, the item is still in the list even though it's
been
removed from the database. If I refresh my browser, the item disappears.
So, my question is, how do I get the ChoiceList to ask for its list AFTER
the form's onSubmit is called? Here's my code (note that I'm extending
ChoiceList, but I don't think I'm overriding any related functionality):
//the choicelist
public class WorldChoiceList extends ListChoice {
@SpringBean
private WorldService worldService;
public WorldChoiceList(String id, IModel model) {
super(id);
setChoices(new LoadableDetachableModel() {
protected Object load() {
return worldService.allByName();
}
});
setChoiceRenderer(new IChoiceRenderer() {
public Object getDisplayValue(Object object) {
World w = ((World) object);
return w.getName() + , + w.getMaxX() + , +
w.getMaxY();
}
public String getIdValue(Object object, int index) {
if (object.equals()) {
return ;
}
return String.valueOf(((World) object).getWorldId());
}
});
setModel(model);
setNullValid(false);
}
/**
* This override makes it so that the List does not start with a blank
or a Choose One
* label.
* @param selected The selected object
* @return
*/
protected CharSequence getDefaultChoice(final Object selected) {
return ;
}
}
//the web page
public class AdminHome extends AdminPage {
@SpringBean
private WorldService worldService;
private World selected;
public AdminHome() {
add(new FeedbackPanel(feedback));
Form form = new Form(form) {
public void onSubmit() {
if (selected != null)
worldService.deleteWorld(selected);
}
};
form.add(new WorldChoiceList(worldList, new Model() {
public void setObject(final Object object) {
selected = (World) object;
}
}));
add(form);
add(new BookmarkablePageLink(createWorld, CreateWorld.class));
}
}
Thanks for any help :-)
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Suckerfish dropdowns for wicket
Hi Tames, It worked when I upgraded from wicket 1.2.6 to 1.3 and showed no error. Would you please suggest me what change should I make in your code, so that I would have no links in the topMenuItems. thanks. Tames wrote: Hello. I created the example (using Eclipse with MyEclipse plugin) and got no such error. I did however, put in all the generics of MenuItem where needed (List, ArrayList, etc). Also, you have to add all of the various imports from org.apache.wicket, create your own MyFirstPage and MySecondPage classes. Exported to Tomcat, and all worked fine. topMenuItems is a Java ArrayList object - no magic there. I am using java version 1.6.0 tsuresh wrote: Dear wicketeers Has any one tried Suckerfish dropdowns in wicket. I saw one examle of it in http://javathoughts.capesugarbird.com/2007/11/suckerfish-dropdowns-for-wicket.html I tried to run the example but some error was shown with the message no get method for topMenuItems. Can some one please solve the problem and comment. thanks -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Suckerfish-dropdowns-for-wicket-tp14208480p14360383.html Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: ModalWindow bug - unable to close when added AjaxButton in content of the window
Was there any resolution for this? I have the same thing with rc2 with a
valid form. From the javascript console:
*INFO: *
Initiating Ajax POST request on ../../?wicket:interface=:4:39:::0:2random=
0.745044540904514
*INFO: *Invoking pre-call handler(s)...
*INFO: *Received ajax response (457 characters)
*INFO: *
?xml version=1.0
encoding=UTF-8?ajax-responseevaluate![CDATA[var win;
try {
win = window.parent.Wicket.Window;
} catch (ignore) {
}
if (typeof(win) == undefined || typeof(win.current) == undefined) {
try {
win = window.Wicket.Window;
} catch (ignore) {
}
}
if (typeof(win) != undefined typeof(win.current) != undefined) {
window.parent.setTimeout(function() {
win.current.close();
}, 0);
}]]/evaluate/ajax-response
*INFO: *Response parsed. Now invoking steps...
*ERROR: *Exception evaluating javascript: TypeError:
window.parent.setTimeout is not a function
On Sep 20, 2007 9:58 AM, Vit Rozkovec [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yes, the form validates, I put the breakpoint at onSubmit and that
method was invoked.
I tried it also with empty form.
The behavior is following:
when I have only AjaxLinks in the form, it is ok.
When I add AjaxButton, the behavior changes - the first time the modal
window is displayed, it is possible to close the window with the cross
in the upper right corner and with any AjaxLink I have in the form. But
only when the first click goes to one of these elements.
When I first click on the button to close the window, suddently the
cross and the links became dead too.
Vitek
Matej Knopp wrote:
Are you sure your Form validates, when you click AjaxLink? Because
otherwise the onSubmit is not invoked. Can you put a breakpoint in
onSubmit? Also there is onError handler that is invoked when form
validation fails.
-Matej
On 9/14/07, Vit Rozkovec [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am sorry, I could not replicate it in quickstart. The button works
fine there. For now I solved the problem by replacing AjaxButtons with
AjaxLinks.
Vitek
Matej Knopp wrote:
Plase create a jira issue and attach a quickstart to it. Thanks.
-Matej
On 9/13/07, Vit Rozkovec [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Good day,
I am using last snapshot of wicket and there is a problem with modal
window - I create instance of the window and add it to the page. As a
content I use a panel which has these components:
public class ModalConfirmationPanel extends Panel {
public ModalConfirmationPanel(String id, final ModalWindow
window) {
super(id);
window.setTitle(getString(titulek));
Form form = new Form(confirmation);
add(form);
form.add(new TextArea(explanation, new Model()));
form.add(new AjaxLink(ok) {
@Override
public void onClick(AjaxRequestTarget target) {
window.close(target);
}
});
form.add(new AjaxLink(storno) {
@Override
public void onClick(AjaxRequestTarget target) {
window.close(target);
}
});
//form.add(new AjaxSubmitButton(buttonOk, form) {
//@Override
//protected void onSubmit(AjaxRequestTarget target, Form
form) {
//window.close(target);
//}
//});
//form.add(new AjaxButton(buttonStorno, form) {
//@Override
//protected void onSubmit(AjaxRequestTarget target, Form
form) {
//window.close(target);
//}
//});
When I uncomment the lines and add AjaxSubmitButtons or AjaxButtons,
the
modal window cannot be closed anymore, neither with the buttons, nor
with the close button in the header or with links. When I add just
links, it works ok. It does not matter if there is window.close()
method
in the button's onSubmit method.
If you would like I can make a quickstart. I cannot test anymore, but
in
beta3 it worked.
Vitek
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: ModalWindow bug - unable to close when added AjaxButton in content of the window
never mind, seems it's the same as
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-1003
Thies Edeling wrote:
Was there any resolution for this? I have the same thing with rc2 with a
valid form. From the javascript console:
*INFO: *
Initiating Ajax POST request on ../../?wicket:interface=:4:39:::0:2random=
0.745044540904514
*INFO: *Invoking pre-call handler(s)...
*INFO: *Received ajax response (457 characters)
*INFO: *
?xml version=1.0
encoding=UTF-8?ajax-responseevaluate![CDATA[var win;
try {
win = window.parent.Wicket.Window;
} catch (ignore) {
}
if (typeof(win) == undefined || typeof(win.current) == undefined) {
try {
win = window.Wicket.Window;
} catch (ignore) {
}
}
if (typeof(win) != undefined typeof(win.current) != undefined) {
window.parent.setTimeout(function() {
win.current.close();
}, 0);
}]]/evaluate/ajax-response
*INFO: *Response parsed. Now invoking steps...
*ERROR: *Exception evaluating javascript: TypeError:
window.parent.setTimeout is not a function
On Sep 20, 2007 9:58 AM, Vit Rozkovec [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yes, the form validates, I put the breakpoint at onSubmit and that
method was invoked.
I tried it also with empty form.
The behavior is following:
when I have only AjaxLinks in the form, it is ok.
When I add AjaxButton, the behavior changes - the first time the modal
window is displayed, it is possible to close the window with the cross
in the upper right corner and with any AjaxLink I have in the form. But
only when the first click goes to one of these elements.
When I first click on the button to close the window, suddently the
cross and the links became dead too.
Vitek
Matej Knopp wrote:
Are you sure your Form validates, when you click AjaxLink? Because
otherwise the onSubmit is not invoked. Can you put a breakpoint in
onSubmit? Also there is onError handler that is invoked when form
validation fails.
-Matej
On 9/14/07, Vit Rozkovec [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am sorry, I could not replicate it in quickstart. The button works
fine there. For now I solved the problem by replacing AjaxButtons with
AjaxLinks.
Vitek
Matej Knopp wrote:
Plase create a jira issue and attach a quickstart to it. Thanks.
-Matej
On 9/13/07, Vit Rozkovec [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Good day,
I am using last snapshot of wicket and there is a problem with modal
window - I create instance of the window and add it to the page. As a
content I use a panel which has these components:
public class ModalConfirmationPanel extends Panel {
public ModalConfirmationPanel(String id, final ModalWindow
window) {
super(id);
window.setTitle(getString(titulek));
Form form = new Form(confirmation);
add(form);
form.add(new TextArea(explanation, new Model()));
form.add(new AjaxLink(ok) {
@Override
public void onClick(AjaxRequestTarget target) {
window.close(target);
}
});
form.add(new AjaxLink(storno) {
@Override
public void onClick(AjaxRequestTarget target) {
window.close(target);
}
});
//form.add(new AjaxSubmitButton(buttonOk, form) {
//@Override
//protected void onSubmit(AjaxRequestTarget target, Form
form) {
//window.close(target);
//}
//});
//form.add(new AjaxButton(buttonStorno, form) {
//@Override
//protected void onSubmit(AjaxRequestTarget target, Form
form) {
//window.close(target);
//}
//});
When I uncomment the lines and add AjaxSubmitButtons or AjaxButtons,
the
modal window cannot be closed anymore, neither with the buttons, nor
with the close button in the header or with links. When I add just
links, it works ok. It does not matter if there is window.close()
method
in the button's onSubmit method.
If you would like I can make a quickstart. I cannot test anymore, but
in
beta3 it worked.
Vitek
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL
Re: Suckerfish dropdowns for wicket
this would make a great contribution to the wicketstuff project! On Dec 16, 2007 5:41 AM, tsuresh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi Tames, It worked when I upgraded from wicket 1.2.6 to 1.3 and showed no error. Would you please suggest me what change should I make in your code, so that I would have no links in the topMenuItems. thanks. Tames wrote: Hello. I created the example (using Eclipse with MyEclipse plugin) and got no such error. I did however, put in all the generics of MenuItem where needed (List, ArrayList, etc). Also, you have to add all of the various imports from org.apache.wicket, create your own MyFirstPage and MySecondPage classes. Exported to Tomcat, and all worked fine. topMenuItems is a Java ArrayList object - no magic there. I am using java version 1.6.0 tsuresh wrote: Dear wicketeers Has any one tried Suckerfish dropdowns in wicket. I saw one examle of it in http://javathoughts.capesugarbird.com/2007/11/suckerfish-dropdowns-for-wicket.html I tried to run the example but some error was shown with the message no get method for topMenuItems. Can some one please solve the problem and comment. thanks -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Suckerfish-dropdowns-for-wicket-tp14208480p14360384.html Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Two home pages?
On Sat, Dec 15, 2007 at 08:44:32PM -0800, Cristina wrote:
Hello,
I'm working on an app where users and admins will perform mutually exclusive
use cases. That's quite a common situation. It looks like the simpler
approach here would be to return one home page with the user menu and
another one with the admin menu. The choice would be placed in the Login
page and executed according to the profile of the username that's trying to
access the app.
A technique I've used is to have a dummy home page that just redirects
to one page or the other:
public class HomePage extends WebPage {
public HomePage() {
if (isUser()) {
setResponsePage(UserHomePage.class);
} else {
setResponsePage(AdminHomePage.class);
}
}
}
You don't even need a HomePage.html file.
jk
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Redirect to a page with POST parameters
Hello, I'm looking for a way to redirect to an external page that needs some POST parameters to works. It will be used in a paiement system implementation (it needs some data like currency, amount... passed using post parameters). I know how to redirect a user to a simple url (with getRequestCycle().setRequestTarget(...)), but I don't know how to define post vars for it. Thanks in advance ;) -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Redirect-to-a-page-with-POST-parameters-tp14362262p14362262.html Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Redirect to a page with POST parameters
real Post variables are not directly possible (or you have to go to a page that has a form pre filled in and you submit that when the page is loaded) You can generate a GET url request with parameters and use the RedirectRequestTarget to redirect to it. johan On Dec 16, 2007 3:59 PM, Pills [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello, I'm looking for a way to redirect to an external page that needs some POST parameters to works. It will be used in a paiement system implementation (it needs some data like currency, amount... passed using post parameters). I know how to redirect a user to a simple url (with getRequestCycle().setRequestTarget(...)), but I don't know how to define post vars for it. Thanks in advance ;) -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Redirect-to-a-page-with-POST-parameters-tp14362262p14362262.html Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.comhttp://nabble.com/ . - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Two home pages?
Why not:
Application#getHomePage() {
if(!isUser()) { return AdminPage.class; }
return UserPage.class;
}
On Dec 16, 2007 2:46 PM, John Krasnay [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, Dec 15, 2007 at 08:44:32PM -0800, Cristina wrote:
Hello,
I'm working on an app where users and admins will perform mutually
exclusive
use cases. That's quite a common situation. It looks like the simpler
approach here would be to return one home page with the user menu and
another one with the admin menu. The choice would be placed in the Login
page and executed according to the profile of the username that's trying
to
access the app.
A technique I've used is to have a dummy home page that just redirects
to one page or the other:
public class HomePage extends WebPage {
public HomePage() {
if (isUser()) {
setResponsePage(UserHomePage.class);
} else {
setResponsePage(AdminHomePage.class);
}
}
}
You don't even need a HomePage.html file.
jk
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Buy Wicket in Action: http://manning.com/dashorst
Apache Wicket 1.3.0-rc1 is released
Get it now: http://www.apache.org/dyn/closer.cgi/wicket/1.3.0-rc1/
Re: Session.invalidate()
Cool, thanks! As you can probably tell, I am new to Wicket, and haven't quite figured out all its nuances yet! So far, I love it though! Is there a good article about nuances such as the difference between setResponsePage(MyPage.class) and setResponsePage(new MyPage()) and/or one that explains the request cycle in depth? Thanks! Nathan igor.vaynberg wrote: right, i meant to say setresponsepage(mypage.class) :) -igor On Dec 15, 2007 3:30 PM, Johan Compagner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Wont that just result in page expire?? Session.invalidat() doesnt invalidate at that time but at the end of the request I see 2 options Session.invalidat() setResponsePage(new mypage()); setRedirect(false) Or Session.invalidat() setResponsePage(mypage.class); setRedirect(true) On 12/15/07, Igor Vaynberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: session.invalidate(); setresponsepage(new mypage()); requestcycle.setredirect(true); === -igor On Dec 14, 2007 8:14 PM, NateRedding [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello, I am writing a web application that has a need to log the user out when a certain action is performed. So, I do a Session.invalidate(). This takes me to the Page Expired Error Page that I set in my application settings. However, when this particular action is performed, I simply want to take the user to a different page other than the Page Expired Error Page that does not require the user to be authenticated. Any recommendations on how to accomplish this? Thanks, Nathan -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Session.invalidate%28%29-tp14345242p14345242.html Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Session.invalidate%28%29-tp14345242p14365139.html Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Streaming a huge ZIP file
Stupid me of not knowing anymore what i committed myself
AbstractResourceStreamWriter writer = new AbstractResourceStreamWriter()
{
write(OutputStream output)
{
// do your generation and output
}
};
RequestCycle.get().setRequestTarget(new ResourceStreamRequestTarget(writer,
test.zip));
johan
P.S. not everything of this example is yet in a release (will be 1.3rc3)
On Dec 13, 2007 1:16 AM, Gabor Szokoli [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Dec 12, 2007 11:58 PM, Igor Vaynberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
((WebResponse)r.getResponse).setAttachmentHeader(foo.xls);
Indeed!
Thank you.
Gabor Szokoli
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Session.invalidate()
Cool, thanks! As you can probably tell, I am new to Wicket, and haven't quite figured out all its nuances yet! So far, I love it though! Is there a good article about nuances such as the difference between setResponsePage(MyPage.class) and setResponsePage(new MyPage()) and/or one that explains the request cycle in depth? I think Wicket In Action talks about that in detail. setResponsePage(MyPage.class) results in Wicket redirecting to the bookmarkable URL to MyPage so that after the redirect a page instance is created. SetResponsePage(MyPage()) makes Wicket handle the request directly using the instance you provide (rather than redirecting to a bookmarkable URL). Eelco - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Two home pages?
Or create a single page used by both user as an entry point and have
different menu options visible depending on the user.
Hint: a security framework like swarm can easily do this. :D ;)
http://wicketstuff.org/confluence/display/STUFFWIKI/Wicket-Security
Maurice
On Dec 16, 2007 5:02 PM, Martijn Dashorst [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Why not:
Application#getHomePage() {
if(!isUser()) { return AdminPage.class; }
return UserPage.class;
}
On Dec 16, 2007 2:46 PM, John Krasnay [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, Dec 15, 2007 at 08:44:32PM -0800, Cristina wrote:
Hello,
I'm working on an app where users and admins will perform mutually
exclusive
use cases. That's quite a common situation. It looks like the simpler
approach here would be to return one home page with the user menu and
another one with the admin menu. The choice would be placed in the Login
page and executed according to the profile of the username that's trying
to
access the app.
A technique I've used is to have a dummy home page that just redirects
to one page or the other:
public class HomePage extends WebPage {
public HomePage() {
if (isUser()) {
setResponsePage(UserHomePage.class);
} else {
setResponsePage(AdminHomePage.class);
}
}
}
You don't even need a HomePage.html file.
jk
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Buy Wicket in Action: http://manning.com/dashorst
Apache Wicket 1.3.0-rc1 is released
Get it now: http://www.apache.org/dyn/closer.cgi/wicket/1.3.0-rc1/
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Problem with hiding/showing components with AJAX and isVisible()
Hello, I encountered a problem with hiding/showing components with ajax. If a component is initially not visible according to the isVisible() method, it is not rendered on the page. But if it becomes visible as an effect of ajax request and I try to update it on the client by adding the component to AjaxRequesTarget it will still not be shown. I think that the problem is caused by the fact that if component is not initially visible nothing, even a placeholder for the component is not rendered to the client. So when ajax response that tries to replace the component in DOM tree is executed on the client, it can not find any component with the markup id and therefore can not replace some node that does not exist. There are multiple quite easy workarounds for this hiding problem. For example using CSS visibility attribute (quite ugly), or placing the component you are willing to hide and show in a markup container that is always rendered and sending back update of this markup container in ajax request instead of the contained component. But I somehow think that it is quite peculiar that one needs to find workarounds for this kind of trivial-looking task. I did not create bug (or improvement request) yet because I want to know what others think about this and I'm quite new to the framework so I might be doing something wrong. If it is necessary to make improvements to framework to fix this, how about adding placeholders in HTML for non-rendered components. Instead of not rendering anything at all, empty div or span with necessary markup id could be rendered. Thanks, -Mika - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DatePickerSettings and Time?
Hello, I am looking for a component that I can use that will allow users to enter a date and a time. I was hoping to use the following 2 classes to accomplish this. wicket.extensions.markup.html.datepicker.DatePickerSettings ; wicket.extensions.markup.html.datepicker.PopupDatePicker; I don't see a way to change the format to also allow for a time to be entered. Is there another package that has components that allow for a time picker? Also I ran into a problem with using the date picker in a modal window. It didn't work. Any workarounds for that? Thanks for any help. Karen - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: DatePickerSettings and Time?
On Dec 16, 2007 1:55 PM, Karen Schaper [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello, I am looking for a component that I can use that will allow users to enter a date and a time. I was hoping to use the following 2 classes to accomplish this. wicket.extensions.markup.html.datepicker.DatePickerSettings ; wicket.extensions.markup.html.datepicker.PopupDatePicker; I don't see a way to change the format to also allow for a time to be entered. Is there another package that has components that allow for a time picker? Please take a look at the wicket-datetime project. Eelco - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Problem with hiding/showing components with AJAX and isVisible()
Hi, Thanks a lot. Did not expect to get the answer in 5 minutes =). I should have read the docs better since the improvement I was suggesting was already implemented. You just got a new buyer for the book. -Mika -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Problem-with-hiding-showing-components-with-AJAX-and-isVisible%28%29-tp14366588p14367024.html Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
