Re: Stateless pages and performance
Jonathan Locke schrieb: hi Jonathan Until you've got a handle on your scaling problem (and it probably is that and not a performance problem) and you know what needs to be tuned, the best policy is probably to just build something simply and quickly in order to discover if you even have a problem that requires this solution. talking about scalability, you posted a CachedPanel on your blog once. unfortunately it seems to be gone. is this still floating around anywhere? thx uwe - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
How to redisplay a previous/known page
Hello: in a call back, I'd like to setResponsePage(A Page that had been displayed/created already) for example, redisplay the home page without having to do things like setResponsePage(new HomePage(params)), rather, I'd like to retrieved the HomePage object that has already been created when user accessed it the first time. Basically how to locate the page object based on class/link name. BTW, Is it possible to make the page object stateless when using setResponsePage(pageObject). so that pageObject would not be serialized/saved? for performance? I read that using setResponsePage(Home.class) would make a non-session object of Home, but setResponsePage(new Home(obj)) would make home object saved in session.
Re: How to get page URL
I'm touched, thanks On Jan 19, 2008 11:55 PM, Hoover, William [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: It wasn't ;o) I have been adding them as they come in :o) -Original Message- From: Boon Aik Chew [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Saturday, January 19, 2008 2:55 AM To: users@wicket.apache.org Subject: Re: How to get page URL I didn't know it's in the WIKI :p On Jan 18, 2008 10:02 PM, Hoover, William [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Add/Edit if necessary http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/x/sGw -Original Message- From: Boon Aik Chew [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, January 18, 2008 8:33 AM To: users@wicket.apache.org Subject: Re: How to get page URL It worked! Thanks! On Jan 18, 2008 9:07 PM, Martin Makundi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: And if you want the absolute path, like I did, you can use RequestUtils.toAbsolutePath(urlFor(xx)); ** Martin 2008/1/18, Martijn Lindhout [EMAIL PROTECTED]: getRequestCycle().urlFor(Page) 2008/1/18, Boon Aik Chew [EMAIL PROTECTED]: For some reason I need to get URL of a page class inside WebApplication, how do I accomplish that? -- Martijn Lindhout JointEffort IT Services http://www.jointeffort.nl [EMAIL PROTECTED] +31 (0)6 18 47 25 29 - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
create new model object of a Form from one of its FormComp values??
Hello All, Have tried to search for this in the forums, but am not having much success due to the multiple concepts involved. I apologize in advance for the long post. Question: is there a way to, after a Form has been submitted, create a new model object for that Form, based upon a value of a FormComponent within the Form, and then update that new Form model object with the values of the models of the other FormComponents in the Form?? For example, I have a Account editor, used to both create and edit Accounts, which consists of a Form containing a number of FormComponents, eg., account name, date created, etc. For the moment just consider the case of creating a new Account. The Account constructor requires the email address of the person who is to be the admin of the Account. Internally it converts that email address to a user object, saves that user to the db, and sets that user as admin of the Account. Therefore, one of the FormComponents in the Account editor is a TextField whose model is the email address of the admin to provide to the Account constructor. So far, so good. I have many editors like the one above for creating/editing other domain objects, and they work great. For them I initially set the editor Form model object to a new instance of the type of object to be edited, and then update that model object using the models of the FormComponents in that respective editor. I understand and am using a homegrown variant of ICompoundModel without problem. Again, so far, so good. The problem: since the Account constructor requires the admin email address, and that address cannot be determined in advance, I cannot pre-create an Account to set as a blank model object to initialize the Account editor. It is possible I could give a fake admin email address to the Account constructor, but that would create a fake user in the db, who would then have to be deleted - I would rather avoid that. What I had hoped to be able to do is: upon Form submission, get the admin email address from the TextField (in the Form) which handles that. Create a NEW Account using that address (and handling any errors that occur). Set the model object of the editor Form as that newly-created account. Update that Form model object (new account) using the models of the other FormComponents, like I do successfully with my editors for other objects. I have read the docs and reviewed the source code - it seems I need to insert code to do the above in the chain of calls that flow from Form submission, after successful validation of FormComponents. My question is, exactly where? My best guess is override the editor Form's beforeUpdateFormComponentModels method, or perhaps the Form's updateFormComponentModels method, maybe even the process method?. Inital attempts at this have been unsuccessful. Any and all suggestions/constructive criticism appreciated. Thank you in advance for your time. -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/create-new-model-object-of-a-Form-from-one-of-its-FormComp-values---tp14983110p14983110.html Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: How to change the style of navigator in PageableViewList
just subclass the pagingnavigator and add a markup that fits your needs ... Mead Lai-2 wrote: Hi, should the navigator of PageableViewList be individuation,or designe by user?the default style is too ugly, just like the example in the wicket package: 1234...789 ; Now, I wanne change the style to be: First Prev Next End Showing 1 to 11 of 108 itemsPage:1/11 SumPage:11 And any efficiency PageAble Component, could U recommend for me? Thanks, Mead [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ Express yourself instantly with MSN Messenger! Download today it's FREE! http://messenger.msn.click-url.com/go/onm00200471ave/direct/01/ - Michael Sparer http://talk-on-tech.blogspot.com -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/How-to-change-the-style-of-navigator-in-PageableViewList-tp14978321p14983537.html Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Replace HTML Frameset
Hi together, I've a page with a Frameset. In one frame I include a page from another server. I want to replace the Frameset by something else... - Does anybody knows how I can do this??? Thanks, Sebastian -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Replace-HTML-Frameset-tp14983298p14983298.html Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: create new model object of a Form from one of its FormComp values??
personally i would map the form to a bean, and then in onsubmit() transfer those properties to an instance of your domain object. -igor On Jan 20, 2008 7:54 AM, infodoc [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello All, Have tried to search for this in the forums, but am not having much success due to the multiple concepts involved. I apologize in advance for the long post. Question: is there a way to, after a Form has been submitted, create a new model object for that Form, based upon a value of a FormComponent within the Form, and then update that new Form model object with the values of the models of the other FormComponents in the Form?? For example, I have a Account editor, used to both create and edit Accounts, which consists of a Form containing a number of FormComponents, eg., account name, date created, etc. For the moment just consider the case of creating a new Account. The Account constructor requires the email address of the person who is to be the admin of the Account. Internally it converts that email address to a user object, saves that user to the db, and sets that user as admin of the Account. Therefore, one of the FormComponents in the Account editor is a TextField whose model is the email address of the admin to provide to the Account constructor. So far, so good. I have many editors like the one above for creating/editing other domain objects, and they work great. For them I initially set the editor Form model object to a new instance of the type of object to be edited, and then update that model object using the models of the FormComponents in that respective editor. I understand and am using a homegrown variant of ICompoundModel without problem. Again, so far, so good. The problem: since the Account constructor requires the admin email address, and that address cannot be determined in advance, I cannot pre-create an Account to set as a blank model object to initialize the Account editor. It is possible I could give a fake admin email address to the Account constructor, but that would create a fake user in the db, who would then have to be deleted - I would rather avoid that. What I had hoped to be able to do is: upon Form submission, get the admin email address from the TextField (in the Form) which handles that. Create a NEW Account using that address (and handling any errors that occur). Set the model object of the editor Form as that newly-created account. Update that Form model object (new account) using the models of the other FormComponents, like I do successfully with my editors for other objects. I have read the docs and reviewed the source code - it seems I need to insert code to do the above in the chain of calls that flow from Form submission, after successful validation of FormComponents. My question is, exactly where? My best guess is override the editor Form's beforeUpdateFormComponentModels method, or perhaps the Form's updateFormComponentModels method, maybe even the process method?. Inital attempts at this have been unsuccessful. Any and all suggestions/constructive criticism appreciated. Thank you in advance for your time. -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/create-new-model-object-of-a-Form-from-one-of-its-FormComp-values---tp14983110p14983110.html Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Questions for permission of using the design of wicket-example
Hi, It is great to hear that Wicket is popular in Japan! With your questions you ask some difficult ones :) I'll forward your question to the appropriate people within the Apache foundation. It will take some time to get an answer back. So this is not a no or a yes answer, but a wait for an answer answer. If you want to go forward quickly, you could use the design, and change the logo to something that doesn't have Apache Wicket in it. Martijn -- Buy Wicket in Action: http://manning.com/dashorst Apache Wicket 1.3.0 is released Get it now: http://www.apache.org/dyn/closer.cgi/wicket/1.3.0
Questions for permission of using the design of wicket-example
Hi, Few days ago, we (I and my friends) organize a user group of Wicket in Japan(Wicket User Group Japan aka Wicket-JA) and already 80+ people join with us. https://sourceforge.jp/projects/wicket-ja We are creating the group-site now (we haven't it yet. only mailing lists). The wicket framework is so hot now in Japan! We would like to expand the number of users in japan by providing wicket-related information to our members in japanese language and at some time would like to contribute to the Apache Wicket project by sending you some bug-fixing or function-expanding code. We have some questions to the wicket team. and I could not find out the contact address on wicket site. I hope that the members of wicket team will read this message... Our questions: 1. We would like to make our pages visually 'wicket-like'. So we would like to use the design and background images of your 'wicket- example' like http://www.wicketstuff.org/wicket13/captcha/ . May I do that? 2. Can we use your Wicket Logo mark on our site? or is it under any kind of protections? If it is possible, we would like to put the logo mark on our top page. Thank you. - Tsutomu YANO mailto:benbrand at mac.com - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Required tag types?
Is there any reason that components require that they be applied to specific tag types in the markup files? I'm writing a little utility which calculates at runtime what editor to use based on the property type (a la Trails). So, I have no idea what type of tag to use. I thought I'd just do this (the actual component is a TextField in this case): div wicket:id=editor / But, I get the following error message: org.apache.wicket.markup.MarkupException: Component editor must be applied to a tag of type 'input', not 'div wicket:id=editor' (line 0, column 0) If I change my markup to: input type=text wicket:id=editor / then it works. But, suppose a certain property requires a more complicated editor component (maybe rich text, so I'd use something like FCKEditor). Would that component be complaining that it's being applied to an input tag? Is there any generic way to do this so that all components will be happy at runtime with the markup? Is there any way to relax that restriction? James - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Required tag types?
So, the key is to use Fragments? This is very similar to how we did it in Trails. I would like to make this somewhat reusable in other projects so that they can define their own editors without having to change this framework code. I'm somewhat new to Wicket, so maybe I just don't understand this all yet, but it seems to me like this framework will only be able to use Fragments defined within the current markup (the BeanEditPanel.html file). Is that true? In Trails, we had the concept of a component address that you would use to locate the editor component you want to use. So, it could be defined in another page supplied by the user. Trails comes with a default page containing all of its editors as Blocks (similar to a Fragment). The default behavior returns components from this page as the editors for properties. However, any client application could define their own editor component blocks on some page and use those also. On 1/20/08, Gerolf Seitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: have you seen Al's Bean Editor [0]? this might give you a hint in the right direction. regards, gerolf [0] http://herebebeasties.com/2007-08-17/wicket-bean-editor/ On Jan 20, 2008 10:17 PM, James Carman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Is there any reason that components require that they be applied to specific tag types in the markup files? I'm writing a little utility which calculates at runtime what editor to use based on the property type (a la Trails). So, I have no idea what type of tag to use. I thought I'd just do this (the actual component is a TextField in this case): div wicket:id=editor / But, I get the following error message: org.apache.wicket.markup.MarkupException: Component editor must be applied to a tag of type 'input', not 'div wicket:id=editor' (line 0, column 0) If I change my markup to: input type=text wicket:id=editor / then it works. But, suppose a certain property requires a more complicated editor component (maybe rich text, so I'd use something like FCKEditor). Would that component be complaining that it's being applied to an input tag? Is there any generic way to do this so that all components will be happy at runtime with the markup? Is there any way to relax that restriction? James - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Required tag types?
The way my framework is set up, I've got a PropertyEditorFactory interface:
public interface PropertyEditorFactory
{
public Component createPropertyEditor(String componentName, Object
target, PropertyMetadata meta);
}
If I required my factory to return Panel objects instead, where would
the markup for those Panels come from? Would I have to write my own
Panel extension classes that have the different editor types in them
(TextEditorPanel, BooleanEditorPanel, etc.)?
On 1/20/08, Igor Vaynberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
instead of using fragments you can use panels, which would make the
editors reusable across projects/pages.
as far as why the checks are there...
add(new TextField(foo));
div wicket:id=foo/
will end up with
div wicket:id=foo value=bar/ == not a very useful textbox
wicket does not mutate markup by default, so it will not mutate div
tag to input tag.
it also adds a level of error checking, making sure you add the right
components to the right places.
-igor
On Jan 20, 2008 1:50 PM, James Carman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So, the key is to use Fragments? This is very similar to how we did
it in Trails. I would like to make this somewhat reusable in other
projects so that they can define their own editors without having to
change this framework code. I'm somewhat new to Wicket, so maybe I
just don't understand this all yet, but it seems to me like this
framework will only be able to use Fragments defined within the
current markup (the BeanEditPanel.html file). Is that true? In
Trails, we had the concept of a component address that you would
use to locate the editor component you want to use. So, it could be
defined in another page supplied by the user. Trails comes with a
default page containing all of its editors as Blocks (similar to a
Fragment). The default behavior returns components from this page as
the editors for properties. However, any client application could
define their own editor component blocks on some page and use those
also.
On 1/20/08, Gerolf Seitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
have you seen Al's Bean Editor [0]?
this might give you a hint in the right direction.
regards,
gerolf
[0] http://herebebeasties.com/2007-08-17/wicket-bean-editor/
On Jan 20, 2008 10:17 PM, James Carman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is there any reason that components require that they be applied to
specific tag types in the markup files? I'm writing a little utility
which calculates at runtime what editor to use based on the property
type (a la Trails). So, I have no idea what type of tag to use. I
thought I'd just do this (the actual component is a TextField in this
case):
div wicket:id=editor /
But, I get the following error message:
org.apache.wicket.markup.MarkupException: Component editor must be
applied to a tag of type 'input', not 'div wicket:id=editor' (line
0, column 0)
If I change my markup to:
input type=text wicket:id=editor /
then it works. But, suppose a certain property requires a more
complicated editor component (maybe rich text, so I'd use something
like FCKEditor). Would that component be complaining that it's being
applied to an input tag? Is there any generic way to do this so
that all components will be happy at runtime with the markup? Is
there any way to relax that restriction?
James
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
We are adopting Wicket in our Organization
As I've stated before in a previous post, I work a for a company that develops software for the health care industry. It was a battle between JSF/Seam and Wicket as the framework of choice for the rewrite of the company's portal. After a whitepaper written by a colleague of mine that compared the two implementations, Wicket was the clear winner. (I also presented a demo of the Wicket framework to the team a couple months back). I'd like to thank the authors of the framework for building such a fine tool. After years of struts development, developing web applications with Wicket is a breath of fresh air. Keep up the fine work. I'll update this forum with our experience in developing/deploying web apps using Wicket. - rm3 -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/We-are-adopting-Wicket-in-our-Organization-tp14988751p14988751.html Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Jboss Portal + Wicket (Portlet)
Hi Süli, How did you configure PortletResourceURLFactory for JBoss portal? I got the following error when trying the example: Caused by: javax.portlet.PortletException: Portlet RolesAuthApplication is incorrectly configured. Init parameter PortletResourceURLFactory not specified, nor as context parameter org.apache.portals.bridges.common.PortletResourceURLFactory or as property in org/apache/wicket/protocol/http/portlet/WicketPortlet.properties in the classpath. 13:57:19,593 ERROR [STDERR] at org.apache.wicket.protocol.http.portlet.WicketPortlet.init(WicketPortlet.java:153) 13:57:19,593 ERROR [STDERR] at org.jboss.portal.portlet.impl.jsr168.PortletContainerImpl.initPortlet(PortletContainerImpl.java:359) 13:57:19,593 ERROR [STDERR] at org.jboss.portal.portlet.impl.jsr168.PortletContainerImpl.start(PortletContainerImpl.java:233) Süli Zsolt wrote: Hi! I have been trying to make Wicket (1.3.0) work with Jboss Portal (Jboss 4.2.2 and Portal 2.6.1. or 2.6.3.) for 2 weeks. Everything is ok, except AJAX calling. (This portlet works like charm on Jetspeed2.) So let's see what we know... Ajax Request reaches the server, and it gives me a respond too. The problem is, that the respond doesn't contain an lt;ajax-responsegt;nbsp;element, as this error says (from the WICKET AJAX DEBUG window) ERROR: Errornbsp;whilenbsp;parsingnbsp;response:nbsp;Couldnbsp;notnbsp;findnbsp;rootnbsp;lt;ajax-responsegt;nbsp;element INFO: Invokingnbsp;post-callnbsp;handler(s)... WicketAjaxGet JS functions has this String as first parameter: http://localhost:8080/portal/portal/default/wickethelloportlet/WicketHelloPortletPortletWindow?action=2amp;_wuview=%2Fwickethelloportlet%2F%3Fwicket%3Ainterface%3D%3A0%3Ac1-link%3A%3AIBehaviorListener%3A0%3Aamp;_ru=true I debugged JbossPortal, and I saw that the HttpServletRequest has a _wuview parameter, but it doesn't appear in the generated PortletRequest (as a parameter). (If I call that URL directly from the browser, it generates an lt;ajax-responsegt; element and the _wuview parameter still exists in the PortletRequest.) So my RequestTarget will be [EMAIL PROTECTED] pageClass=wicket.test.HomePage, notnbsp; org.apache.wicket.request.target.component.listener.BehaviorRequestTarget. Does anybody has luck with Wicket + Jboss Portal? What am I doing wrong? Any help would be appreciated! Thx in advance! - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Jboss-Portal-%2B-Wicket-%28Portlet%29-tp14953943p14988555.html Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: We are adopting Wicket in our Organization
it would be great if we could see the whitepaper :) -igor On Jan 20, 2008 3:58 PM, robert.mcguinness [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: As I've stated before in a previous post, I work a for a company that develops software for the health care industry. It was a battle between JSF/Seam and Wicket as the framework of choice for the rewrite of the company's portal. After a whitepaper written by a colleague of mine that compared the two implementations, Wicket was the clear winner. (I also presented a demo of the Wicket framework to the team a couple months back). I'd like to thank the authors of the framework for building such a fine tool. After years of struts development, developing web applications with Wicket is a breath of fresh air. Keep up the fine work. I'll update this forum with our experience in developing/deploying web apps using Wicket. - rm3 -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/We-are-adopting-Wicket-in-our-Organization-tp14988751p14988751.html Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: We are adopting Wicket in our Organization
igor.vaynberg wrote: it would be great if we could see the whitepaper :) -igor I'll see what I can do. - rm3 -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/We-are-adopting-Wicket-in-our-Organization-tp14988751p14989916.html Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: How to redisplay a previous/known page
On Sun, 20 Jan 2008, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: in a call back, I'd like to setResponsePage(A Page that had been displayed/created already) for example, redisplay the home page without having to do things like setResponsePage(new HomePage(params)), rather, I'd like to retrieved the HomePage object that has already been created when user accessed it the first time. Basically how to locate the page object based on class/link name. Maybe you can just store the reference to the Page object? Though somehow it would need to be updated if a new instance is being created. Best wishes, Timo -- Timo Rantalaiho Reaktor Innovations OyURL: http://www.ri.fi/ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Required tag types?
they are just regular panels, so the markup can come from anywhere
where the .class file is: your app, or a jar, wherever. and yes you
would have to create a panel per form control.
-igor
On Jan 20, 2008 2:28 PM, James Carman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The way my framework is set up, I've got a PropertyEditorFactory interface:
public interface PropertyEditorFactory
{
public Component createPropertyEditor(String componentName, Object
target, PropertyMetadata meta);
}
If I required my factory to return Panel objects instead, where would
the markup for those Panels come from? Would I have to write my own
Panel extension classes that have the different editor types in them
(TextEditorPanel, BooleanEditorPanel, etc.)?
On 1/20/08, Igor Vaynberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
instead of using fragments you can use panels, which would make the
editors reusable across projects/pages.
as far as why the checks are there...
add(new TextField(foo));
div wicket:id=foo/
will end up with
div wicket:id=foo value=bar/ == not a very useful textbox
wicket does not mutate markup by default, so it will not mutate div
tag to input tag.
it also adds a level of error checking, making sure you add the right
components to the right places.
-igor
On Jan 20, 2008 1:50 PM, James Carman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So, the key is to use Fragments? This is very similar to how we did
it in Trails. I would like to make this somewhat reusable in other
projects so that they can define their own editors without having to
change this framework code. I'm somewhat new to Wicket, so maybe I
just don't understand this all yet, but it seems to me like this
framework will only be able to use Fragments defined within the
current markup (the BeanEditPanel.html file). Is that true? In
Trails, we had the concept of a component address that you would
use to locate the editor component you want to use. So, it could be
defined in another page supplied by the user. Trails comes with a
default page containing all of its editors as Blocks (similar to a
Fragment). The default behavior returns components from this page as
the editors for properties. However, any client application could
define their own editor component blocks on some page and use those
also.
On 1/20/08, Gerolf Seitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
have you seen Al's Bean Editor [0]?
this might give you a hint in the right direction.
regards,
gerolf
[0] http://herebebeasties.com/2007-08-17/wicket-bean-editor/
On Jan 20, 2008 10:17 PM, James Carman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is there any reason that components require that they be applied to
specific tag types in the markup files? I'm writing a little utility
which calculates at runtime what editor to use based on the property
type (a la Trails). So, I have no idea what type of tag to use. I
thought I'd just do this (the actual component is a TextField in this
case):
div wicket:id=editor /
But, I get the following error message:
org.apache.wicket.markup.MarkupException: Component editor must be
applied to a tag of type 'input', not 'div wicket:id=editor' (line
0, column 0)
If I change my markup to:
input type=text wicket:id=editor /
then it works. But, suppose a certain property requires a more
complicated editor component (maybe rich text, so I'd use something
like FCKEditor). Would that component be complaining that it's being
applied to an input tag? Is there any generic way to do this so
that all components will be happy at runtime with the markup? Is
there any way to relax that restriction?
James
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: ListView + reusing Items
Martijn Dashorst wrote: And according to me you are the first person in a while to encounter such a thing... Nah, some of us just do workarounds, or begrudgingly add the urgly method call ;). I must admit having something so simple like adding components to a list, and them not working by default is counter intuitive. Cool, if i have 1 stateful component on the page it works, if i use the ListView for 2 of them it doesn't. So.. by default, ListView does not retain state. I find this bizare considering the other bits of wicket, and the transparent statefulness. (And yes, i think it would be horrible to change, just unfortunate it is like that now and forever) -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/ListView-%2B-reusing-Items-tp14918862p14991821.html Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Security violations and ERROR: filterStart with Tomcat deployment on Debian Etch
I blogged this, and Eelco wisely suggested I post it here. This is both a warning and plea for help - what's the best way to configure Tomcat on Debian for Wicket?Was up until 3am last night banging my head against another frustrating go-nowhere issue deploying Wicket on Debian Etch’s default Tomcat5.5.Apparently the latest version (5.5.20-2etch1) has additional security headaches features which prevent wicket from functioning properly out-of-the-box: * First of all, there’s still an (as-yet-unsolved) mystery around why I couldn’t get Wicket to start up as a filter. Just the mysterious “ERROR: filterStart” which makes me want to feed Tomcat to angry lions. Worked around it by using Wicket in Servlet mode instead. * Tomcat’s juli.jar can’t access WEB-INF/classes/logging.properties. Fixed (in sledgehammer-like way) by adding “permission java.security.AllPermission;” to /etc/tomcat5.5/policy.d/03catalina.policy, in the Juli section. * Tomcat security prevents webapps from accessing all sorts of features and methods by default, including wicket.properties, methods inside shipped jars, etc. Not being a Tomcat expert, and trusting the innate security of the server and millions of lines of third party code (i.e. I’m an idiot) I again just popped a java.security.AllPermission; in appropriate spots in /etc/tomcat5.5/policy.d/04webapps.policy. Let the flames commence!If Tomcat was a little more helpful in its error messages, this would never have been so painful. Jetty has always run my Wicket apps without complaint (though I’ve never tried the official Debian Jetty packages - maybe they’re crippleware secure too?).The only reason I use Tomcat at all is the remote management and deployment features, which are well-supported by Cargo. Now that these issues are out of the way (mostly) I can take another few steps towards my dream of a seamless, fire-and-forget, auto-deploying, smoke-tested, pluggable and modular web app deployment system.Any ideas on how to better configure Tomcat?Any ideas on how to get more information about that ERROR: filterStart problem? I'd really like to do things the recommended way, instead of having to use WicketServlet.Cheers,Dan Daniel WalmsleyDirector,Firesydee:[EMAIL PROTECTED]m: +61404864141
Re: Jboss Portal + Wicket (Portlet)
Hi Markqt,
I followed the instructions I found on this page:
http://cwiki.apache.org/WICKET/portal-howto.html
So my web.xml looks like this:
?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?
web-app xmlns=MailScanner has detected a possible fraud attempt from "java.sun.com" "http://java.sun.com/xml/ns/j2ee"
xmlns:xsi=MailScanner has detected a possible fraud attempt from "www.w3.org" "http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"
xsi:schemaLocation=MailScanner has detected a possible fraud attempt from "java.sun.com" "http://java.sun.com/xml/ns/j2ee
http://java.sun.com/xml/ns/j2ee/web-app_2_4.xsd"
version="2.4"
display-namewickethelloportlet/display-name
filter
filter-namewickethelloportlet/filter-name
filter-classorg.apache.wicket.protocol.http.WicketFilter/filter-class
init-param
param-nameapplicationClassName/param-name
param-valuewicket.test.WicketApplication/param-value
/init-param
/filter
context-param
param-nameorg.apache.wicket.detectPortletContext/param-name
param-valuetrue/param-value
/context-param
filter-mapping
filter-namewickethelloportlet/filter-name
url-pattern/wickethelloportlet/*/url-pattern
dispatcherREQUEST/dispatcher
dispatcherINCLUDE/dispatcher
/filter-mapping
/web-app
---
In the portlet.xml I added these lines
portlet
...
init-param
nameServletContextProvider/name
valueorg.jboss.portal.bridge.JBossServletContextProvider/value
/init-param
init-param
namePortletResourceURLFactory/name
valuewicket.tetst.common.JbossPortletResourceURLFactory/value
/init-param
...
/portlet
And my implementation of PortletResourceURLFactory:
public class JbossPortletResourceURLFactory implements
PortletResourceURLFactory {
public String createResourceURL( PortletConfig portletConfig,
RenderRequest renderRequest, RenderResponse renderResponse, Map
portletArg ) throws PortletException
{
PortletURL url = "" //
- maybe I should use renderResponse.createRenderURL();
if (portletArg != null) {
url.setParameters(portletArg);
}
return url.toString();
}
public String createResourceURL() {
return null;
}
}
I hope this helps!
Zsolt Süli
Markqt wrote:
Hi Süli,
How did you configure PortletResourceURLFactory for JBoss portal? I got the
following error when trying the example:
Caused by: javax.portlet.PortletException: Portlet RolesAuthApplication is
incorrectly configured. Init parameter PortletResourceURLFactory not
specified, nor as context parameter
org.apache.portals.bridges.common.PortletResourceURLFactory or as property
in org/apache/wicket/protocol/http/portlet/WicketPortlet.properties in the
classpath.
13:57:19,593 ERROR [STDERR] at
org.apache.wicket.protocol.http.portlet.WicketPortlet.init(WicketPortlet.java:153)
13:57:19,593 ERROR [STDERR] at
org.jboss.portal.portlet.impl.jsr168.PortletContainerImpl.initPortlet(PortletContainerImpl.java:359)
13:57:19,593 ERROR [STDERR] at
org.jboss.portal.portlet.impl.jsr168.PortletContainerImpl.start(PortletContainerImpl.java:233)
Süli Zsolt wrote:
Hi!
I have been trying to make Wicket (1.3.0) work with Jboss Portal (Jboss
4.2.2 and Portal 2.6.1. or 2.6.3.) for 2 weeks. Everything is ok,
except AJAX calling. (This portlet works like charm on Jetspeed2.)
So let's see what we know...
Ajax Request reaches the server, and it gives me a respond too. The
problem is, that the respond doesn't contain an
lt;ajax-responsegt;nbsp;element, as this error says (from the WICKET
AJAX
DEBUG window)
ERROR:
Errornbsp;whilenbsp;parsingnbsp;response:nbsp;Couldnbsp;notnbsp;findnbsp;rootnbsp;lt;ajax-responsegt;nbsp;element
INFO: Invokingnbsp;post-callnbsp;handler(s)...
WicketAjaxGet JS functions has this String as first parameter:
http://localhost:8080/portal/portal/default/wickethelloportlet/WicketHelloPortletPortletWindow?action="">
I debugged JbossPortal, and I saw that the HttpServletRequest has a
_wuview parameter, but it doesn't appear in the generated
PortletRequest (as a parameter). (If I call that URL directly from the
browser, it generates an lt;ajax-responsegt; element and the _wuview
parameter still exists in the PortletRequest.) So my RequestTarget will
be [EMAIL PROTECTED]
pageClass=wicket.test.HomePage, notnbsp;
org.apache.wicket.request.target.component.listener.BehaviorRequestTarget.
Does anybody has luck with Wicket + Jboss Portal? What am I doing wrong?
Any help would be appreciated! Thx in advance!
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL
