Re: wicket 1.4 release
yes we should make a 1.3.5 and a 1.4m4 asap, there are a lot of changes I think i will make some time this weekend to look over jira issues and also merge back a lot of changes i already did in 1.3.5 igor did also a lot of stuff already so for me within 1 or 2 weeks we could do both releases johan On Thu, Oct 2, 2008 at 8:15 AM, Stefan Lindner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: It's clear that it's not possible to estimate the release of 1.4 final. But can anybody tell us whether a new snapshot (1.4M4) is in sight? Stefan -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: Timo Rantalaiho [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Gesendet: Donnerstag, 2. Oktober 2008 05:37 An: users@wicket.apache.org Betreff: Re: wicket 1.4 release On Wed, 01 Oct 2008, lesterburlap wrote: I've searched everywhere and can't find an answer. I know this is kind of a crappy question to ask the developers... Is there an estimate for a Wicket 1.4 GA release? Will it possibly be by January 2009? I think that it's impossible to estimate the releases of a volunteer-based open source projects in any meaningful way, unfortunately. If others know better, please pipe in. You can always follow the number of open issues https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/IssueNavigator.jspa?reset=truepid=12310561fixfor=12313295resolution=-1sorter/field=issuekeysorter/order=DESC ( http://tinurl.us/a2b895 ) but there might be some new ones coming in as well. Also work continues on 1.3.5 at the same time (fortunately, many of the issues can probably be fixed to both at the same time). Your good patches to the issues are bound to make the release happen earlier ;) I need to make a decision about whether or not to upgrade to 1.4-m3 from 1.3. while intending to upgrade to 1.4 GA prior to my product release in January. I need some stuff that's in 1.4, but I can't release our product with beta libraries included. Fortunately, there is not a lot of special testing for the releases, so a milestone is nearly good enough ;) What's more problematic with releasing with a milestone dependency are the possible API breaks. Best wishes, Timo -- Timo Rantalaiho Reaktor Innovations OyURL: http://www.ri.fi/ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Pure client side validation
Thanks for that solution,
To summarize that:
- Extend a normal Validator
- Add the IValidatorAddListener Interface
- Implement the onAdded method
- In this method: add a Custom Behavior to the component
- In the custom Behavior: Integrate the js like described here:
http://cwiki.apache.org/WICKET/creating-a-behavior-to-use-a-javascript-library.html
But I think there are two weak points in that implementation (correct me if
I'm wrong):
- I have to rewrite the whole logic für the validator in Javascript (ok,
that's no surprise)
- In case the validator gets an error, I have to do an ajax request to
trigger the wicket feedback message system (a js only feedback would be a
problem, because js validation would produce duplicate messages after a
submit with errors). So in general I only avoid the ajax request if the js
validator finds no errors.
I have some additional questions about this topic:
- Are there any example implementations for such client side validations?
- There is also a Wicket-Stuff project fvalidate: Has this project a
different concept?
- Is there a plan to integrate pure client side validation in the wicket
framework soon?
Harry
igor.vaynberg wrote:
it is possible, just not there out of the box. can look like something
like this
class rangejsvalidator extends rangevalidator implements
IValidatorAddListener {
void onAdded(Component component) { // add some behavior to output
javascript validation }
}
-igor
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Pure-client-side-validation-tp19737383p19774599.html
Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
AW: wicket 1.4 release
Sounds great! Thank you! Stefan -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: Johan Compagner [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Gesendet: Donnerstag, 2. Oktober 2008 09:26 An: users@wicket.apache.org Betreff: Re: wicket 1.4 release yes we should make a 1.3.5 and a 1.4m4 asap, there are a lot of changes I think i will make some time this weekend to look over jira issues and also merge back a lot of changes i already did in 1.3.5 igor did also a lot of stuff already so for me within 1 or 2 weeks we could do both releases johan On Thu, Oct 2, 2008 at 8:15 AM, Stefan Lindner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: It's clear that it's not possible to estimate the release of 1.4 final. But can anybody tell us whether a new snapshot (1.4M4) is in sight? Stefan -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: Timo Rantalaiho [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Gesendet: Donnerstag, 2. Oktober 2008 05:37 An: users@wicket.apache.org Betreff: Re: wicket 1.4 release On Wed, 01 Oct 2008, lesterburlap wrote: I've searched everywhere and can't find an answer. I know this is kind of a crappy question to ask the developers... Is there an estimate for a Wicket 1.4 GA release? Will it possibly be by January 2009? I think that it's impossible to estimate the releases of a volunteer-based open source projects in any meaningful way, unfortunately. If others know better, please pipe in. You can always follow the number of open issues https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/IssueNavigator.jspa?reset=truepid=12310561fixfor=12313295resolution=-1sorter/field=issuekeysorter/order=DESC ( http://tinurl.us/a2b895 ) but there might be some new ones coming in as well. Also work continues on 1.3.5 at the same time (fortunately, many of the issues can probably be fixed to both at the same time). Your good patches to the issues are bound to make the release happen earlier ;) I need to make a decision about whether or not to upgrade to 1.4-m3 from 1.3. while intending to upgrade to 1.4 GA prior to my product release in January. I need some stuff that's in 1.4, but I can't release our product with beta libraries included. Fortunately, there is not a lot of special testing for the releases, so a milestone is nearly good enough ;) What's more problematic with releasing with a milestone dependency are the possible API breaks. Best wishes, Timo -- Timo Rantalaiho Reaktor Innovations OyURL: http://www.ri.fi/ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: DefaultDataTable with date column
Or simply use an AbstractColumn for that, you can even create a reusable
DateColumn:
public class DateColumn extends AbstractColumn {
private String datePattern; //you can have a Pattern instead
//You can overload the constructor, to have default date patterns
for example
public DateColumn(IModel columnName, String datePattern) {
super(columnName);
this.datePattern = datePattern;
}
public void populateItem(Item cellItem, String componentId, IModel
model) {
Document doc = (Document) model.getModelObject();
SimpleDateFormat df = (SimpleDateFormat) DateFormat.getInstance();
df.applyPattern(datePattern);
cellItem.add(new Label(componentId,
df.format(doc.getDeliveryDate(;
}
}
Then just use this class as you would with any other column, along with
a pattern to apply to the format:
ListIColumn columns = new ArrayListIColumn();
columns.add(new DateColumn(new Model(Delivery date), dd MMM '@'
hh:mm a));
Regards,
Edgar Merino
Jeremy Thomerson escribió:
The default java.util.Date converter within Wicket has varied between
releases. I suggest adding this to the init method of your application
class and controlling the date format yourself if you need a specific
format:
((ConverterLocator) getConverterLocator()).set(Date.class, new
IConverterDate() {
private static final long serialVersionUID = 1L;
private final DateFormat mFormat = new
SimpleDateFormat(MM/dd/yy hh:mm:ss.SSS);
public Date convertToObject(String value, Locale locale) {
try {
return mFormat.parse(value);
} catch (ParseException e) {
e.printStackTrace();
}
return null;
}
public String convertToString(Date value, Locale locale) {
return mFormat.format(value);
}
});
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Having Wicket append #someanchor
I would probably just do a simple javascript and make a headercontribution... But I guess it's not really the standard way when it comes to anchors... Craig Tataryn wrote: *bump* On Wed, Oct 1, 2008 at 2:04 PM, Craig Tataryn [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I was wondering if there is a way to have Wicket append some anchor information to a response page? So if I were on: MyPage.html, then they click a submit button and the server side codes does a setResponsePage(MyPage.class) I would want the actual page to be MyPage.html#someanchor A suggestion on ##wicket was to do a redirect through httpServletResponse and rewrite the url myself, but I wanted to know if Wicket supported this a bit more out of the box Thanks! Craig. -- Craig Tataryn site: http://www.basementcoders.com/ podcast:http://feeds.feedburner.com/TheBasementCoders irc: ThaDon on freenode #basementcoders, ##wicket, #papernapkin im: [EMAIL PROTECTED], skype: craig.tataryn -- -Wicket for love Nino Martinez Wael Java Specialist @ Jayway DK http://www.jayway.dk +45 2936 7684 - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: linking to a text ResourceReference
thanks!
I knew it was one line. You guys are great!
On Sep 30, 2008, at 10:39 PM, Igor Vaynberg wrote:
call urlfor(resourcereference)
-igor
On Tue, Sep 30, 2008 at 6:08 PM, Ryan McKinley [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Hello-
I know I have seen an example of this somewhere, so i'm feeling
kinda silly
as I ask for help
I am trying to integrate Open Flash Charts (OFC) with wicket. You
pass OFC
a url containing json to draw a chart. Something like:
script type=text/javascript
var so = new SWFObject(/open-flash-chart.swf, chart, 500,
300, 9,
#FF);
so.addVariable(data-file, ${TODO -- need to have link to data} );
so.addParam(allowScriptAccess, sameDomain);
so.write(my_chart);
/script
I know I can use a global mount point, but I'm looking to do
something
similar to how JFreeChart works
http://cwiki.apache.org/WICKET/jfreechart-and-wicket-example.html
Where you have a Chart object in the Component scope and various
actions can
manipulate it.
I can create a WebResource -- but how would I pass the URL to
javascript?
Any pointers would be great!
thanks
ryan
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
CFP ApacheCon EU 2009
If you only have thirty seconds: The Call for Papers for ApacheCon Europe 2009, to be held in Amsterdam, from 23rd to 27th March, is now open! Submit your proposals at http://eu.apachecon.com/c/aceu2009/cfp/ before 24th October. Remember that early bird prices for ApacheCon US 2008, to be held in New Orleans, from 3rd to 7th November, will go up this Friday, at midnight Eastern time! Sponsorship opportunities for ApacheCon US 2008 and ApacheCon EU 2009 are still available. If you or your company are interested in becoming a sponsor, please contact Delia Frees at [EMAIL PROTECTED] for details. *** If you want all the details: ApacheCon Europe 2009 - Leading the Wave of Open Source Amsterdam, The Netherlands 23rd to 27th March, 2009 Call for Papers Opens for ApacheCon Europe 2009 The Apache Software Foundation (ASF) invites submissions to its official conference, ApacheCon Europe 2009. To be held 23rd to 27th March, 2009 at the Mövenpick Hotel Amsterdam City Centre, ApacheCon serves as a forum for showcasing the ASF's latest developments, including its projects, membership, and community. ApacheCon offers unparalleled educational opportunities, with dedicated presentations, hands-on trainings, and sessions that address core technology, development, business/marketing, and licensing issues in Open Source. ApacheCon's wide range of activities are designed to promote the exchange of ideas amongst ASF Members, innovators, developers, vendors, and users interested in the future of Open Source technology. The conference program includes competitively selected presentations, trainings/workshops, and a small number of invited speakers. All sessions undergo a peer review process by the ApacheCon Conference Planning team. The following information provides presentation category descriptions, and information about how to submit your proposal. Conference Themes and Topics APACHECON 2009 - LEADING THE WAVE OF OPEN SOURCE Building on the success of the last two years, we are excited to return to Amsterdam in 2009. We'll be continuing to offer our very popular two-day trainings, including certifications of completion for those who fulfill all the requirements of these trainings. The ASF comprises some of the most active and recognized developers in the Open Source community. By bringing together the pioneers, developers, and users of flagship Open Source technologies, ApacheCon provides an influential platform for dialogue, between the speaker and the audience, between project contributors and the community at large, traversing a wide range of ideas, expertise, and personalities. ApacheCon welcomes submissions from like-minded delegates across many fields, geographic locations, and areas of development. The breadth and loosely-structured nature of the Apache community lends itself to conference content that is also somewhat loosely-structured. Common themes of interest address groundbreaking technologies and emerging trends, successful practices (from development to deployment), and lessons learned (tips, tools, and tricks). In addition to technical content, ApacheCon invites Business Track submissions that address Open Source business, marketing, and legal/licensing issues. Topics appropriate for submission to this conference are manifold, and may include but are not restricted to: - Apache HTTP server topics such as installation, configuration, and migration - ASF-wide projects such as Lucene, SpamAssassin, Jackrabbit, and Maven - Scripting languages and dynamic content such as Java, Perl, Python, Ruby, XSL, and PHP - Security and e-commerce - Performance tuning, load balancing and high availability - New technologies and broader initiatives such as Web Services and Web 2.0 - ASF-Incubated projects such as Sling, UIMA, and Shindig Submission Guidelines Submissions must include - Title - Speaker name, with affiliation and email address - Speaker bio (100 words or less) - Short description (50 words or less) - Full description including abstract and objectives (200 words or less) - Expertise level (beginner to advanced) - Format and duration (trainings vs. general presentation; half-, full- or two-day workshop, etc.) - Intended audience and maximum number of participants (trainings only) - Background knowledge expected of the participants (trainings only) Types of Presentations - Trainings/Workshops - General Sessions - Case Studies/Industry Profiles - Invited Keynotes/Panels/Speakers - Corporate Showcases Demonstrations BoF sessions and Fast Feather Track talks will be selected separately Pre Conference Trainings/Workshops Held on the first and second day of the conference – 2008-03-23 and 2008-03-24, Trainings require a registration fee beyond the regular conference fee. Proposals may be submitted for half-day (3 hours), full-day (6 hours), or two-day (12 hours) training sessions, aimed at providing in-depth, hands-on development experience or related continuing education. Training
Re: Pure client side validation
harrypitt wrote:
Thanks for that solution,
To summarize that:
- Extend a normal Validator
- Add the IValidatorAddListener Interface
- Implement the onAdded method
- In this method: add a Custom Behavior to the component
- In the custom Behavior: Integrate the js like described here:
http://cwiki.apache.org/WICKET/creating-a-behavior-to-use-a-javascript-library.html
But I think there are two weak points in that implementation (correct me if
I'm wrong):
- I have to rewrite the whole logic für the validator in Javascript (ok,
that's no surprise)
- In case the validator gets an error, I have to do an ajax request to
trigger the wicket feedback message system (a js only feedback would be a
problem, because js validation would produce duplicate messages after a
submit with errors). So in general I only avoid the ajax request if the js
validator finds no errors.
I have some additional questions about this topic:
- Are there any example implementations for such client side validations?
- There is also a Wicket-Stuff project fvalidate: Has this project a
different concept?
- Is there a plan to integrate pure client side validation in the wicket
framework soon?
I wont be doing pure client side validation, as it is unsafe..
Harry
igor.vaynberg wrote:
it is possible, just not there out of the box. can look like something
like this
class rangejsvalidator extends rangevalidator implements
IValidatorAddListener {
void onAdded(Component component) { // add some behavior to output
javascript validation }
}
-igor
--
-Wicket for love
Nino Martinez Wael
Java Specialist @ Jayway DK
http://www.jayway.dk
+45 2936 7684
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: How to get rid of wicket:id in XML output
Why mocking with that setter. Put wicket in deployment mode. That way you can't mess up the order of setting things. Read chapter 14 of Wicket in Action on configuring Wicket—it will tell you to call super.init() first before doing anything yourself. It also instructs you to *NEVER* deploy your web app with development mode to a production system. Martijn On Wed, Oct 1, 2008 at 2:24 PM, Stefan Lindner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'm trying to build a dynamic site map according to Michael Sparers article http://cwiki.apache.org/WICKET/seo-search-engine-optimization.html Instead of an HTML page a XML page is used with XML markup looking like ?xml version=1.0 encoding=UTF-8? urlset xmlns=http://www.sitemaps.org/schemas/sitemap/0.9; url wicket:id=urlList loc wicket:id=locNodehttp://www.example.com//loc lastmod wicket:id=lastmodNode2005-01-01/lastmod changefreq wicket:id=changefreqNodemonthly/changefreq priority wicket:id=priorityNode0.8/priority /url /urlset When I use a ListView for urlList and add Labels for locNode etc. the wicket:id properties are included in the XML output. How can I get rid of wicket:id? Setting a global getMarkupSettings().setStripWicketTags(true) does not work. I use Wicket 1.4M3 Stefan - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Become a Wicket expert, learn from the best: http://wicketinaction.com Apache Wicket 1.3.4 is released Get it now: http://www.apache.org/dyn/closer.cgi/wicket/1.3. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
URL to use with mod_jk
Hi guys, in my project, I very often use absolute url, built with RequestUtils.toAbsolutePath. It works just fine, all my ressources are available. I recently installed Apache and mod_jk. Are the url valid to be served through apache/mod_jk? Because they have a form like http://domain/foo/bar/resources/org.apache.wicket.Application//path/to/my/file.png and I was wondering if an url like above will be served through apache or through tomcat? (my goal is to serve static files through apache, like everybody ;)) thank you - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Pure client side validation
Ok, my question was not clear enough. With Pure client side validation i mean a javascript validation which needs no ajax requests. Of course there should be always a server side validation and the whole default Wicket form-handling AFTER the submit. It would be really stupid to just rely on javascript validation. Nino.Martinez wrote: I wont be doing pure client side validation, as it is unsafe.. -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Pure-client-side-validation-tp19737383p19777140.html Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: DefaultDataTable with date column
Great!
this is just what I need
Thanks
Pablo
--
From: Edgar Merino [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, October 02, 2008 5:19 AM
To: users@wicket.apache.org
Subject: Re: DefaultDataTable with date column
Or simply use an AbstractColumn for that, you can even create a reusable
DateColumn:
public class DateColumn extends AbstractColumn {
private String datePattern; //you can have a Pattern instead
//You can overload the constructor, to have default date patterns for
example
public DateColumn(IModel columnName, String datePattern) {
super(columnName);
this.datePattern = datePattern;
}
public void populateItem(Item cellItem, String componentId, IModel
model) {
Document doc = (Document) model.getModelObject();
SimpleDateFormat df = (SimpleDateFormat) DateFormat.getInstance();
df.applyPattern(datePattern);
cellItem.add(new Label(componentId,
df.format(doc.getDeliveryDate(;
}
}
Then just use this class as you would with any other column, along with a
pattern to apply to the format:
ListIColumn columns = new ArrayListIColumn();
columns.add(new DateColumn(new Model(Delivery date), dd MMM '@'
hh:mm a));
Regards,
Edgar Merino
Jeremy Thomerson escribió:
The default java.util.Date converter within Wicket has varied between
releases. I suggest adding this to the init method of your application
class and controlling the date format yourself if you need a specific
format:
((ConverterLocator) getConverterLocator()).set(Date.class, new
IConverterDate() {
private static final long serialVersionUID = 1L;
private final DateFormat mFormat = new
SimpleDateFormat(MM/dd/yy hh:mm:ss.SSS);
public Date convertToObject(String value, Locale locale) {
try {
return mFormat.parse(value);
} catch (ParseException e) {
e.printStackTrace();
}
return null;
}
public String convertToString(Date value, Locale locale) {
return mFormat.format(value);
}
});
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: wicket 1.4 release
totally out of topic and excuse me for my curiosity, but do you use subversion to the heavy lifting with such branching/merging there or use some distributed version control system behind the scenes? K On Thu, Oct 2, 2008 at 9:25 AM, Johan Compagner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: yes we should make a 1.3.5 and a 1.4m4 asap, there are a lot of changes I think i will make some time this weekend to look over jira issues and also merge back a lot of changes i already did in 1.3.5 igor did also a lot of stuff already so for me within 1 or 2 weeks we could do both releases johan On Thu, Oct 2, 2008 at 8:15 AM, Stefan Lindner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: It's clear that it's not possible to estimate the release of 1.4 final. But can anybody tell us whether a new snapshot (1.4M4) is in sight? Stefan -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: Timo Rantalaiho [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Gesendet: Donnerstag, 2. Oktober 2008 05:37 An: users@wicket.apache.org Betreff: Re: wicket 1.4 release On Wed, 01 Oct 2008, lesterburlap wrote: I've searched everywhere and can't find an answer. I know this is kind of a crappy question to ask the developers... Is there an estimate for a Wicket 1.4 GA release? Will it possibly be by January 2009? I think that it's impossible to estimate the releases of a volunteer-based open source projects in any meaningful way, unfortunately. If others know better, please pipe in. You can always follow the number of open issues https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/IssueNavigator.jspa?reset=truepid=12310561fixfor=12313295resolution=-1sorter/field=issuekeysorter/order=DESC ( http://tinurl.us/a2b895 ) but there might be some new ones coming in as well. Also work continues on 1.3.5 at the same time (fortunately, many of the issues can probably be fixed to both at the same time). Your good patches to the issues are bound to make the release happen earlier ;) I need to make a decision about whether or not to upgrade to 1.4-m3 from 1.3. while intending to upgrade to 1.4 GA prior to my product release in January. I need some stuff that's in 1.4, but I can't release our product with beta libraries included. Fortunately, there is not a lot of special testing for the releases, so a milestone is nearly good enough ;) What's more problematic with releasing with a milestone dependency are the possible API breaks. Best wishes, Timo -- Timo Rantalaiho Reaktor Innovations OyURL: http://www.ri.fi/ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: wicket 1.4 release
Apache projects have to do things transparently, so most of the work is (or should be) done in Subversion. Apache is all about the community. On Thu, Oct 2, 2008 at 8:44 AM, Kristof Jozsa [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: totally out of topic and excuse me for my curiosity, but do you use subversion to the heavy lifting with such branching/merging there or use some distributed version control system behind the scenes? K On Thu, Oct 2, 2008 at 9:25 AM, Johan Compagner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: yes we should make a 1.3.5 and a 1.4m4 asap, there are a lot of changes I think i will make some time this weekend to look over jira issues and also merge back a lot of changes i already did in 1.3.5 igor did also a lot of stuff already so for me within 1 or 2 weeks we could do both releases johan On Thu, Oct 2, 2008 at 8:15 AM, Stefan Lindner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: It's clear that it's not possible to estimate the release of 1.4 final. But can anybody tell us whether a new snapshot (1.4M4) is in sight? Stefan -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: Timo Rantalaiho [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Gesendet: Donnerstag, 2. Oktober 2008 05:37 An: users@wicket.apache.org Betreff: Re: wicket 1.4 release On Wed, 01 Oct 2008, lesterburlap wrote: I've searched everywhere and can't find an answer. I know this is kind of a crappy question to ask the developers... Is there an estimate for a Wicket 1.4 GA release? Will it possibly be by January 2009? I think that it's impossible to estimate the releases of a volunteer-based open source projects in any meaningful way, unfortunately. If others know better, please pipe in. You can always follow the number of open issues https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/IssueNavigator.jspa?reset=truepid=12310561fixfor=12313295resolution=-1sorter/field=issuekeysorter/order=DESC ( http://tinurl.us/a2b895 ) but there might be some new ones coming in as well. Also work continues on 1.3.5 at the same time (fortunately, many of the issues can probably be fixed to both at the same time). Your good patches to the issues are bound to make the release happen earlier ;) I need to make a decision about whether or not to upgrade to 1.4-m3 from 1.3. while intending to upgrade to 1.4 GA prior to my product release in January. I need some stuff that's in 1.4, but I can't release our product with beta libraries included. Fortunately, there is not a lot of special testing for the releases, so a milestone is nearly good enough ;) What's more problematic with releasing with a milestone dependency are the possible API breaks. Best wishes, Timo -- Timo Rantalaiho Reaktor Innovations OyURL: http://www.ri.fi/ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: wicket 1.4 release
we use subversion. I hope that apache will upgrade all the servers to the latest subversion version (1.5.x) or did they already do that? Because there merging is a bit simpler, i still want to test there real merge client they now have but pity is that that is an sub thing of there Collab desktop (that wants to have mylyn and so on) instead of the where it should be just in the subclipse plugin johan On Thu, Oct 2, 2008 at 2:44 PM, Kristof Jozsa [EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote: totally out of topic and excuse me for my curiosity, but do you use subversion to the heavy lifting with such branching/merging there or use some distributed version control system behind the scenes? K On Thu, Oct 2, 2008 at 9:25 AM, Johan Compagner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: yes we should make a 1.3.5 and a 1.4m4 asap, there are a lot of changes I think i will make some time this weekend to look over jira issues and also merge back a lot of changes i already did in 1.3.5 igor did also a lot of stuff already so for me within 1 or 2 weeks we could do both releases johan On Thu, Oct 2, 2008 at 8:15 AM, Stefan Lindner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: It's clear that it's not possible to estimate the release of 1.4 final. But can anybody tell us whether a new snapshot (1.4M4) is in sight? Stefan -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: Timo Rantalaiho [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Gesendet: Donnerstag, 2. Oktober 2008 05:37 An: users@wicket.apache.org Betreff: Re: wicket 1.4 release On Wed, 01 Oct 2008, lesterburlap wrote: I've searched everywhere and can't find an answer. I know this is kind of a crappy question to ask the developers... Is there an estimate for a Wicket 1.4 GA release? Will it possibly be by January 2009? I think that it's impossible to estimate the releases of a volunteer-based open source projects in any meaningful way, unfortunately. If others know better, please pipe in. You can always follow the number of open issues https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/IssueNavigator.jspa?reset=truepid=12310561fixfor=12313295resolution=-1sorter/field=issuekeysorter/order=DESC ( http://tinurl.us/a2b895 ) but there might be some new ones coming in as well. Also work continues on 1.3.5 at the same time (fortunately, many of the issues can probably be fixed to both at the same time). Your good patches to the issues are bound to make the release happen earlier ;) I need to make a decision about whether or not to upgrade to 1.4-m3 from 1.3. while intending to upgrade to 1.4 GA prior to my product release in January. I need some stuff that's in 1.4, but I can't release our product with beta libraries included. Fortunately, there is not a lot of special testing for the releases, so a milestone is nearly good enough ;) What's more problematic with releasing with a milestone dependency are the possible API breaks. Best wishes, Timo -- Timo Rantalaiho Reaktor Innovations OyURL: http://www.ri.fi/ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: wicket 1.4 release
re: 1.4m4 Do milestone releases come before beta releases? (or do you just go straight to final from milestone?) LBB -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/wicket-1.4-release-tp19772502p19779596.html Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Inmethod Grid with wicket 1.3
Jim Pinkham wrote: I'm getting this error at runtime I don't understand: NoSuchMethodError: org.apache.wicket.MetaDataKey: method init()V not found at com.inmethod.grid.common.AbstractGrid$4.init(AbstractGrid.java:908) at com.inmethod.grid.common.AbstractGrid.clinit(AbstractGrid.java:907) at org.firstuucolumbus.CatalogPage.init(CatalogPage.java:43) I think you're using the head release of the inmethod grid for Wicket 1.4, rather than the grid-BETA2.jar that is compatible with Wicket 1.3. However, the grid-BETA2.jar has some minor problems in FireFox 3 (column widths sometime don't adjust themselves on resize). I'm trying to figure out how to upgrade my application to Wicket 1.4 specifically for this (excellent) library. LBB -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Inmethod-Grid-with-wicket-1.3-tp19731013p19779992.html Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Form GET doesn't call onSubmit method
Hi,
I have a form that overrides the method:
protected String getMethod() {
return Form.METHOD_GET;
}
When the form is submitted, the onSubmit method is never called and I
am routed to the home page instead of the location I specified. Any
suggestions??
Thanks, Eyal.
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Form-GET-doesn%27t-call-onSubmit-method-tp19780009p19780009.html
Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Inmethod Grid with wicket 1.3
Damn it, for some reason nabble 2 didn't show all the other responses to Jim's question. Sorry to answer it needlessly. LBB -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Inmethod-Grid-with-wicket-1.3-tp19731013p19780036.html Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
using Prototype.js and Scriptaculous with latest version of wicket
Hello, I am considering starting a new project (web app) with Wicket. This project will be based heavily on JavaScript with Prototype and Scriptaculous. Most of the UI will be generated via JavaScript and the also the new CANVAS tag will be used. I really need to know if I'm going the right direction. is it safe to combine the Prototype lib with Wicket? Do I need to fully understand how Wicket works before trying to combine it? my prior expropriate is mostly with struts1. Thanks in advance. Ilan F -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/using-Prototype.js-and-Scriptaculous-with-latest-version-of-wicket-tp19781402p19781402.html Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Form submit to bookmarkable page
Is it possible to submit a form to a bookmarkable page (with form input
as page parameters)?
What I want is a form with a submit button/link that leads to a page
with e.g. URl
http://mysite.com/myapp/targetPage/param1/value1/param2/value2
Of course I mount the submit link#s target page class in
Application.init() { mountBookmarkablePage (targetPage,
MyTargetPage.class); }
Any hint?
Stefan
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Pure client side validation
On Thu, Oct 2, 2008 at 12:33 AM, harrypitt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks for that solution,
To summarize that:
- Extend a normal Validator
- Add the IValidatorAddListener Interface
- Implement the onAdded method
- In this method: add a Custom Behavior to the component
- In the custom Behavior: Integrate the js like described here:
http://cwiki.apache.org/WICKET/creating-a-behavior-to-use-a-javascript-library.html
dont know about your last point. it should just output some javascript
that does the validation test and integrates the results into some
javascript error reporting framework you have - simplest of which
would be alert('field foo does not validate');
But I think there are two weak points in that implementation (correct me if
I'm wrong):
- I have to rewrite the whole logic für the validator in Javascript (ok,
that's no surprise)
this is what ajax helps you not to do, but you said you dont want that
so this is the price to pay.
- In case the validator gets an error, I have to do an ajax request to
trigger the wicket feedback message system (a js only feedback would be a
problem, because js validation would produce duplicate messages after a
submit with errors). So in general I only avoid the ajax request if the js
validator finds no errors.
dont really follow you. if there is a validation error you do not
submit the form...your validators can output something like this:
addevent(form, 'onsubmit', function() { if (!test()) { return false; }});
this way if validation fails the onsubmit returns false and the form
is not submitted. addevent() depends on your favorite javascript
library.
I have some additional questions about this topic:
- Are there any example implementations for such client side validations?
dont think so, maybe you can create one
- There is also a Wicket-Stuff project fvalidate: Has this project a
different concept?
i think that project is defunct, fvalidate has been for a while at least.
- Is there a plan to integrate pure client side validation in the wicket
framework soon?
no, not soon. it is something we can consider for 1.5 but first we
need to end of life 1.3 and release 1.4.
-igor
Harry
igor.vaynberg wrote:
it is possible, just not there out of the box. can look like something
like this
class rangejsvalidator extends rangevalidator implements
IValidatorAddListener {
void onAdded(Component component) { // add some behavior to output
javascript validation }
}
-igor
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Pure-client-side-validation-tp19737383p19774599.html
Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: wicket 1.4 release
milestones-rcs-release was the plan this time around i believe. -igor On Thu, Oct 2, 2008 at 6:46 AM, lesterburlap [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: re: 1.4m4 Do milestone releases come before beta releases? (or do you just go straight to final from milestone?) LBB -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/wicket-1.4-release-tp19772502p19779596.html Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: wicket 1.4 release
promises promises! -igor On Thu, Oct 2, 2008 at 12:25 AM, Johan Compagner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: yes we should make a 1.3.5 and a 1.4m4 asap, there are a lot of changes I think i will make some time this weekend to look over jira issues and also merge back a lot of changes i already did in 1.3.5 igor did also a lot of stuff already so for me within 1 or 2 weeks we could do both releases johan On Thu, Oct 2, 2008 at 8:15 AM, Stefan Lindner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: It's clear that it's not possible to estimate the release of 1.4 final. But can anybody tell us whether a new snapshot (1.4M4) is in sight? Stefan -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: Timo Rantalaiho [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Gesendet: Donnerstag, 2. Oktober 2008 05:37 An: users@wicket.apache.org Betreff: Re: wicket 1.4 release On Wed, 01 Oct 2008, lesterburlap wrote: I've searched everywhere and can't find an answer. I know this is kind of a crappy question to ask the developers... Is there an estimate for a Wicket 1.4 GA release? Will it possibly be by January 2009? I think that it's impossible to estimate the releases of a volunteer-based open source projects in any meaningful way, unfortunately. If others know better, please pipe in. You can always follow the number of open issues https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/IssueNavigator.jspa?reset=truepid=12310561fixfor=12313295resolution=-1sorter/field=issuekeysorter/order=DESC ( http://tinurl.us/a2b895 ) but there might be some new ones coming in as well. Also work continues on 1.3.5 at the same time (fortunately, many of the issues can probably be fixed to both at the same time). Your good patches to the issues are bound to make the release happen earlier ;) I need to make a decision about whether or not to upgrade to 1.4-m3 from 1.3. while intending to upgrade to 1.4 GA prior to my product release in January. I need some stuff that's in 1.4, but I can't release our product with beta libraries included. Fortunately, there is not a lot of special testing for the releases, so a milestone is nearly good enough ;) What's more problematic with releasing with a milestone dependency are the possible API breaks. Best wishes, Timo -- Timo Rantalaiho Reaktor Innovations OyURL: http://www.ri.fi/ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: using Prototype.js and Scriptaculous with latest version of wicket
there shouldnt be any problems using prototype with wicket. however, if you are looking to generate your ui purely in javascript you will not be able to take advantage of a lot of wicket components -igor On Thu, Oct 2, 2008 at 8:18 AM, ilanfox [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello, I am considering starting a new project (web app) with Wicket. This project will be based heavily on JavaScript with Prototype and Scriptaculous. Most of the UI will be generated via JavaScript and the also the new CANVAS tag will be used. I really need to know if I'm going the right direction. is it safe to combine the Prototype lib with Wicket? Do I need to fully understand how Wicket works before trying to combine it? my prior expropriate is mostly with struts1. Thanks in advance. Ilan F -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/using-Prototype.js-and-Scriptaculous-with-latest-version-of-wicket-tp19781402p19781402.html Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Problem understanding LoadableDetachableModel and ListViews
Hi there,
I have been struggling for some time now to understand how
LoadableDetachableModel and a ListView work together. The starting point
was Chapter 5.5.2 of Wicket in Action where it is recommended to provide
your own ItemModel if the underlying list changes frequently. To try out
how Wicket behaves without such a custom ItemModel, I wrote the following
Test:
body
em wicket:id=listview
span wicket:id=label/spana wicket:id=deletedelete/a
/em
/body
LoadableDetachableModel model = new LoadableDetachableModel() {
@Override
protected Object load() {
System.out.println(load);
return Arrays.asList(new TestItem[] {
new TestItem(a + Math.random()),
new TestItem(b + Math.random()),
new TestItem(c + Math.random()) });
}
protected void onDetach() {
System.out.println(detach);
}
};
ListView listview = new ListView(listview, model) {
protected void populateItem(ListItem item) {
final TestItem itemModel = (TestItem) item.getModelObject();
item.add(new Label(label, itemModel.toString()));
item.add(new Link(delete) {
@Override
public void onClick() {
System.out.println(Delete + itemModel);
}
});
}
};
add(listview);
Now, I would expect that when I hit the delete link, Wicket would call the
load Method of the LoadableDetachableModel before printing Delete... as the
default implementation will use the index and the list to determine the item to
delete. To my surprise, however, the Delete... message is printed with the
correct item and the load Method is called afterwards. In my understanding,
this contradicts the idea of the LoadableDetachableModel since Wicket seems to
have a copy of the original list somewhere so that it can determine the list
item on which the action was invoked before loading the underlying list.
Can someone spot my mistake?
Thanks,
J.
--
Dr. Jürgen Lind
iteratec GmbHFon: +49 (0)89 614551-44
Inselkammerstrasse 4 Fax: +49 (0)89 614551-10
82008 Unterhaching Web: www.iteratec.de
Sitz und Registergericht der iteratec GmbH: München HRB 113 519
Geschäftsführer: Klaus Eberhardt, Mark Goerke, Inge Hanschke, Ralf Menzel
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Form submit to bookmarkable page
you can override form's oncomponenttag() and call super then
tag.put(action, urlfor(yourpage.class));
i believe that should work
-igor
On Thu, Oct 2, 2008 at 8:41 AM, Stefan Lindner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is it possible to submit a form to a bookmarkable page (with form input
as page parameters)?
What I want is a form with a submit button/link that leads to a page
with e.g. URl
http://mysite.com/myapp/targetPage/param1/value1/param2/value2
Of course I mount the submit link#s target page class in
Application.init() { mountBookmarkablePage (targetPage,
MyTargetPage.class); }
Any hint?
Stefan
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Form GET doesn't call onSubmit method
create a quickstart and attach it to a jira issue
-igor
On Thu, Oct 2, 2008 at 7:09 AM, eyalbenamram [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I have a form that overrides the method:
protected String getMethod() {
return Form.METHOD_GET;
}
When the form is submitted, the onSubmit method is never called and I
am routed to the home page instead of the location I specified. Any
suggestions??
Thanks, Eyal.
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Form-GET-doesn%27t-call-onSubmit-method-tp19780009p19780009.html
Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Problem understanding LoadableDetachableModel and ListViews
your link works on the object and not on the model, instead
add(new link(delete, item.getmodel()) { onclick() {
delete(getmodelobject()); }});
-igor
On Thu, Oct 2, 2008 at 9:04 AM, Jürgen Lind [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi there,
I have been struggling for some time now to understand how
LoadableDetachableModel and a ListView work together. The starting point
was Chapter 5.5.2 of Wicket in Action where it is recommended to provide
your own ItemModel if the underlying list changes frequently. To try out
how Wicket behaves without such a custom ItemModel, I wrote the following
Test:
body
em wicket:id=listview
span wicket:id=label/spana wicket:id=deletedelete/a
/em
/body
LoadableDetachableModel model = new LoadableDetachableModel() {
@Override
protected Object load() {
System.out.println(load);
return Arrays.asList(new TestItem[] {
new TestItem(a + Math.random()),
new TestItem(b + Math.random()),
new TestItem(c + Math.random()) });
}
protected void onDetach() {
System.out.println(detach);
}
};
ListView listview = new ListView(listview, model) {
protected void populateItem(ListItem item) {
final TestItem itemModel = (TestItem) item.getModelObject();
item.add(new Label(label, itemModel.toString()));
item.add(new Link(delete) {
@Override
public void onClick() {
System.out.println(Delete + itemModel);
}
});
}
};
add(listview);
Now, I would expect that when I hit the delete link, Wicket would call the
load Method of the LoadableDetachableModel before printing Delete... as
the
default implementation will use the index and the list to determine the item
to
delete. To my surprise, however, the Delete... message is printed with the
correct item and the load Method is called afterwards. In my
understanding,
this contradicts the idea of the LoadableDetachableModel since Wicket seems
to
have a copy of the original list somewhere so that it can determine the list
item on which the action was invoked before loading the underlying list.
Can someone spot my mistake?
Thanks,
J.
--
Dr. Jürgen Lind
iteratec GmbHFon: +49 (0)89 614551-44
Inselkammerstrasse 4 Fax: +49 (0)89 614551-10
82008 Unterhaching Web: www.iteratec.de
Sitz und Registergericht der iteratec GmbH: München HRB 113 519
Geschäftsführer: Klaus Eberhardt, Mark Goerke, Inge Hanschke, Ralf Menzel
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Form GET doesn't call onSubmit method
Hi
How? what is a quickstart?
I am using wicket 1.3.4 is it still not fixed there?
igor.vaynberg wrote:
create a quickstart and attach it to a jira issue
-igor
On Thu, Oct 2, 2008 at 7:09 AM, eyalbenamram [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Hi,
I have a form that overrides the method:
protected String getMethod() {
return Form.METHOD_GET;
}
When the form is submitted, the onSubmit method is never called and I
am routed to the home page instead of the location I specified. Any
suggestions??
Thanks, Eyal.
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Form-GET-doesn%27t-call-onSubmit-method-tp19780009p19780009.html
Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Form-GET-doesn%27t-call-onSubmit-method-tp19780009p19782690.html
Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: How to get rid of wicket:id in XML output
btw, shouldn't we fail init if super isn't called in this case like those other protections we built in? Martijn Dashorst wrote: Why mocking with that setter. Put wicket in deployment mode. That way you can't mess up the order of setting things. Read chapter 14 of Wicket in Action on configuring Wicket—it will tell you to call super.init() first before doing anything yourself. It also instructs you to *NEVER* deploy your web app with development mode to a production system. Martijn On Wed, Oct 1, 2008 at 2:24 PM, Stefan Lindner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'm trying to build a dynamic site map according to Michael Sparers article http://cwiki.apache.org/WICKET/seo-search-engine-optimization.html Instead of an HTML page a XML page is used with XML markup looking like ?xml version=1.0 encoding=UTF-8? urlset xmlns=http://www.sitemaps.org/schemas/sitemap/0.9; url wicket:id=urlList loc wicket:id=locNodehttp://www.example.com//loc lastmod wicket:id=lastmodNode2005-01-01/lastmod changefreq wicket:id=changefreqNodemonthly/changefreq priority wicket:id=priorityNode0.8/priority /url /urlset When I use a ListView for urlList and add Labels for locNode etc. the wicket:id properties are included in the XML output. How can I get rid of wicket:id? Setting a global getMarkupSettings().setStripWicketTags(true) does not work. I use Wicket 1.4M3 Stefan - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Become a Wicket expert, learn from the best: http://wicketinaction.com Apache Wicket 1.3.4 is released Get it now: http://www.apache.org/dyn/closer.cgi/wicket/1.3. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Wicket-Community-Meetup-in-South-Florida--tp19758680p19782931.html Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: wicket 1.4 release
keep reminding me! On Thu, Oct 2, 2008 at 6:00 PM, Igor Vaynberg [EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote: promises promises! -igor On Thu, Oct 2, 2008 at 12:25 AM, Johan Compagner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: yes we should make a 1.3.5 and a 1.4m4 asap, there are a lot of changes I think i will make some time this weekend to look over jira issues and also merge back a lot of changes i already did in 1.3.5 igor did also a lot of stuff already so for me within 1 or 2 weeks we could do both releases johan On Thu, Oct 2, 2008 at 8:15 AM, Stefan Lindner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: It's clear that it's not possible to estimate the release of 1.4 final. But can anybody tell us whether a new snapshot (1.4M4) is in sight? Stefan -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: Timo Rantalaiho [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Gesendet: Donnerstag, 2. Oktober 2008 05:37 An: users@wicket.apache.org Betreff: Re: wicket 1.4 release On Wed, 01 Oct 2008, lesterburlap wrote: I've searched everywhere and can't find an answer. I know this is kind of a crappy question to ask the developers... Is there an estimate for a Wicket 1.4 GA release? Will it possibly be by January 2009? I think that it's impossible to estimate the releases of a volunteer-based open source projects in any meaningful way, unfortunately. If others know better, please pipe in. You can always follow the number of open issues https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/IssueNavigator.jspa?reset=truepid=12310561fixfor=12313295resolution=-1sorter/field=issuekeysorter/order=DESC ( http://tinurl.us/a2b895 ) but there might be some new ones coming in as well. Also work continues on 1.3.5 at the same time (fortunately, many of the issues can probably be fixed to both at the same time). Your good patches to the issues are bound to make the release happen earlier ;) I need to make a decision about whether or not to upgrade to 1.4-m3 from 1.3. while intending to upgrade to 1.4 GA prior to my product release in January. I need some stuff that's in 1.4, but I can't release our product with beta libraries included. Fortunately, there is not a lot of special testing for the releases, so a milestone is nearly good enough ;) What's more problematic with releasing with a milestone dependency are the possible API breaks. Best wishes, Timo -- Timo Rantalaiho Reaktor Innovations OyURL: http://www.ri.fi/ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Problem understanding LoadableDetachableModel and ListViews
Igor Vaynberg wrote:
your link works on the object and not on the model, instead
add(new link(delete, item.getmodel()) { onclick() {
delete(getmodelobject()); }});
Thank you for your quick reply.
Well the code is roughly the same(?) as in Listing 5.12 of WiA and there
a custom Model is used to illustrate the solution. However, I thought my
test would show me the problem first... Using your code above, the
effect is as expected, i.e. the wrong (new) item is returned to be
deleted.
Now, the question is, what is wrong with my first implementation?
It would seem that the problem that is solved using a custom ItemModel
does not even occur. Or does that code prevent wicket from effectively
detaching model objects and should thus be avoided? What would be the
best practice here?
J.
-igor
On Thu, Oct 2, 2008 at 9:04 AM, Jürgen Lind [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi there,
I have been struggling for some time now to understand how
LoadableDetachableModel and a ListView work together. The starting point
was Chapter 5.5.2 of Wicket in Action where it is recommended to provide
your own ItemModel if the underlying list changes frequently. To try out
how Wicket behaves without such a custom ItemModel, I wrote the following
Test:
body
em wicket:id=listview
span wicket:id=label/spana wicket:id=deletedelete/a
/em
/body
LoadableDetachableModel model = new LoadableDetachableModel() {
@Override
protected Object load() {
System.out.println(load);
return Arrays.asList(new TestItem[] {
new TestItem(a + Math.random()),
new TestItem(b + Math.random()),
new TestItem(c + Math.random()) });
}
protected void onDetach() {
System.out.println(detach);
}
};
ListView listview = new ListView(listview, model) {
protected void populateItem(ListItem item) {
final TestItem itemModel = (TestItem) item.getModelObject();
item.add(new Label(label, itemModel.toString()));
item.add(new Link(delete) {
@Override
public void onClick() {
System.out.println(Delete + itemModel);
}
});
}
};
add(listview);
Now, I would expect that when I hit the delete link, Wicket would call the
load Method of the LoadableDetachableModel before printing Delete... as
the
default implementation will use the index and the list to determine the item
to
delete. To my surprise, however, the Delete... message is printed with the
correct item and the load Method is called afterwards. In my
understanding,
this contradicts the idea of the LoadableDetachableModel since Wicket seems
to
have a copy of the original list somewhere so that it can determine the list
item on which the action was invoked before loading the underlying list.
Can someone spot my mistake?
Thanks,
J.
--
Dr. Jürgen Lind
iteratec GmbHFon: +49 (0)89 614551-44
Inselkammerstrasse 4 Fax: +49 (0)89 614551-10
82008 Unterhaching Web: www.iteratec.de
Sitz und Registergericht der iteratec GmbH: München HRB 113 519
Geschäftsführer: Klaus Eberhardt, Mark Goerke, Inge Hanschke, Ralf Menzel
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Dr. Jürgen Lind
iteratec GmbHFon: +49 (0)89 614551-44
Inselkammerstrasse 4 Fax: +49 (0)89 614551-10
82008 Unterhaching Web: www.iteratec.de
Sitz und Registergericht der iteratec GmbH: München HRB 113 519
Geschäftsführer: Klaus Eberhardt, Mark Goerke, Inge Hanschke, Ralf Menzel
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Problem understanding LoadableDetachableModel and ListViews
final TestItem itemModel = (TestItem) item.getModelObject();
^ on this line you retrieve the object from the model, you then use
this reference inside the onclick() which is called during another
request. since you use the model object reference directly it is not
loaded from the model.
my code, on the other hand, never keeps a direct reference to the
model object, instead it retrieves it from the model inside onclick()
-igor
On Thu, Oct 2, 2008 at 10:10 AM, Jürgen Lind [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Igor Vaynberg wrote:
your link works on the object and not on the model, instead
add(new link(delete, item.getmodel()) { onclick() {
delete(getmodelobject()); }});
Thank you for your quick reply.
Well the code is roughly the same(?) as in Listing 5.12 of WiA and there
a custom Model is used to illustrate the solution. However, I thought my
test would show me the problem first... Using your code above, the
effect is as expected, i.e. the wrong (new) item is returned to be
deleted.
Now, the question is, what is wrong with my first implementation?
It would seem that the problem that is solved using a custom ItemModel
does not even occur. Or does that code prevent wicket from effectively
detaching model objects and should thus be avoided? What would be the
best practice here?
J.
-igor
On Thu, Oct 2, 2008 at 9:04 AM, Jürgen Lind [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Hi there,
I have been struggling for some time now to understand how
LoadableDetachableModel and a ListView work together. The starting point
was Chapter 5.5.2 of Wicket in Action where it is recommended to
provide
your own ItemModel if the underlying list changes frequently. To try out
how Wicket behaves without such a custom ItemModel, I wrote the following
Test:
body
em wicket:id=listview
span wicket:id=label/spana wicket:id=deletedelete/a
/em
/body
LoadableDetachableModel model = new LoadableDetachableModel() {
@Override
protected Object load() {
System.out.println(load);
return Arrays.asList(new TestItem[] {
new TestItem(a + Math.random()),
new TestItem(b + Math.random()),
new TestItem(c + Math.random()) });
}
protected void onDetach() {
System.out.println(detach);
}
};
ListView listview = new ListView(listview, model) {
protected void populateItem(ListItem item) {
final TestItem itemModel = (TestItem) item.getModelObject();
item.add(new Label(label, itemModel.toString()));
item.add(new Link(delete) {
@Override
public void onClick() {
System.out.println(Delete + itemModel);
}
});
}
};
add(listview);
Now, I would expect that when I hit the delete link, Wicket would call
the
load Method of the LoadableDetachableModel before printing Delete...
as
the
default implementation will use the index and the list to determine the
item
to
delete. To my surprise, however, the Delete... message is printed with
the
correct item and the load Method is called afterwards. In my
understanding,
this contradicts the idea of the LoadableDetachableModel since Wicket
seems
to
have a copy of the original list somewhere so that it can determine the
list
item on which the action was invoked before loading the underlying list.
Can someone spot my mistake?
Thanks,
J.
--
Dr. Jürgen Lind
iteratec GmbHFon: +49 (0)89 614551-44
Inselkammerstrasse 4 Fax: +49 (0)89 614551-10
82008 Unterhaching Web: www.iteratec.de
Sitz und Registergericht der iteratec GmbH: München HRB 113 519
Geschäftsführer: Klaus Eberhardt, Mark Goerke, Inge Hanschke, Ralf Menzel
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Dr. Jürgen Lind
iteratec GmbHFon: +49 (0)89 614551-44
Inselkammerstrasse 4 Fax: +49 (0)89 614551-10
82008 Unterhaching Web: www.iteratec.de
Sitz und Registergericht der iteratec GmbH: München HRB 113 519
Geschäftsführer: Klaus Eberhardt, Mark Goerke, Inge Hanschke, Ralf Menzel
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Pure client side validation
Ahh ok, I get you. So I guess IVisitor would be very good to use here.. Visit every component and put according js validation in there depending on which validator etc... Could be something I would look into at some point.. Maybe the way would be to upgrade the fvalidate integration to current wicket version? harrypitt wrote: Ok, my question was not clear enough. With Pure client side validation i mean a javascript validation which needs no ajax requests. Of course there should be always a server side validation and the whole default Wicket form-handling AFTER the submit. It would be really stupid to just rely on javascript validation. Nino.Martinez wrote: I wont be doing pure client side validation, as it is unsafe.. -- -Wicket for love Nino Martinez Wael Java Specialist @ Jayway DK http://www.jayway.dk +45 2936 7684 - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Problem understanding LoadableDetachableModel and ListViews
Thanks for the explanation. Still, one questions remains: is there
a fundamental problem with the first approach or is it ok to use
the object directly?
J.
Igor Vaynberg wrote:
final TestItem itemModel = (TestItem) item.getModelObject();
^ on this line you retrieve the object from the model, you then use
this reference inside the onclick() which is called during another
request. since you use the model object reference directly it is not
loaded from the model.
my code, on the other hand, never keeps a direct reference to the
model object, instead it retrieves it from the model inside onclick()
-igor
On Thu, Oct 2, 2008 at 10:10 AM, Jürgen Lind [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Igor Vaynberg wrote:
your link works on the object and not on the model, instead
add(new link(delete, item.getmodel()) { onclick() {
delete(getmodelobject()); }});
Thank you for your quick reply.
Well the code is roughly the same(?) as in Listing 5.12 of WiA and there
a custom Model is used to illustrate the solution. However, I thought my
test would show me the problem first... Using your code above, the
effect is as expected, i.e. the wrong (new) item is returned to be
deleted.
Now, the question is, what is wrong with my first implementation?
It would seem that the problem that is solved using a custom ItemModel
does not even occur. Or does that code prevent wicket from effectively
detaching model objects and should thus be avoided? What would be the
best practice here?
J.
-igor
On Thu, Oct 2, 2008 at 9:04 AM, Jürgen Lind [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Hi there,
I have been struggling for some time now to understand how
LoadableDetachableModel and a ListView work together. The starting point
was Chapter 5.5.2 of Wicket in Action where it is recommended to
provide
your own ItemModel if the underlying list changes frequently. To try out
how Wicket behaves without such a custom ItemModel, I wrote the following
Test:
body
em wicket:id=listview
span wicket:id=label/spana wicket:id=deletedelete/a
/em
/body
LoadableDetachableModel model = new LoadableDetachableModel() {
@Override
protected Object load() {
System.out.println(load);
return Arrays.asList(new TestItem[] {
new TestItem(a + Math.random()),
new TestItem(b + Math.random()),
new TestItem(c + Math.random()) });
}
protected void onDetach() {
System.out.println(detach);
}
};
ListView listview = new ListView(listview, model) {
protected void populateItem(ListItem item) {
final TestItem itemModel = (TestItem) item.getModelObject();
item.add(new Label(label, itemModel.toString()));
item.add(new Link(delete) {
@Override
public void onClick() {
System.out.println(Delete + itemModel);
}
});
}
};
add(listview);
Now, I would expect that when I hit the delete link, Wicket would call
the
load Method of the LoadableDetachableModel before printing Delete...
as
the
default implementation will use the index and the list to determine the
item
to
delete. To my surprise, however, the Delete... message is printed with
the
correct item and the load Method is called afterwards. In my
understanding,
this contradicts the idea of the LoadableDetachableModel since Wicket
seems
to
have a copy of the original list somewhere so that it can determine the
list
item on which the action was invoked before loading the underlying list.
Can someone spot my mistake?
Thanks,
J.
--
Dr. Jürgen Lind
iteratec GmbHFon: +49 (0)89 614551-44
Inselkammerstrasse 4 Fax: +49 (0)89 614551-10
82008 Unterhaching Web: www.iteratec.de
Sitz und Registergericht der iteratec GmbH: München HRB 113 519
Geschäftsführer: Klaus Eberhardt, Mark Goerke, Inge Hanschke, Ralf Menzel
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Dr. Jürgen Lind
iteratec GmbHFon: +49 (0)89 614551-44
Inselkammerstrasse 4 Fax: +49 (0)89 614551-10
82008 Unterhaching Web: www.iteratec.de
Sitz und Registergericht der iteratec GmbH: München HRB 113 519
Geschäftsführer: Klaus Eberhardt, Mark Goerke, Inge Hanschke, Ralf Menzel
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Dr. Jürgen Lind
iteratec GmbHFon: +49 (0)89 614551-44
Inselkammerstrasse 4 Fax: +49 (0)89 614551-10
82008 Unterhaching Web: www.iteratec.de
Sitz und Registergericht der iteratec GmbH: München HRB 113 519
Geschäftsführer: Klaus Eberhardt, Mark
Re: Problem understanding LoadableDetachableModel and ListViews
yes, there is a huge fundamental problem with your approach: you keep
the object reference which means the object is serialized instead of
being retrieved through a loadable detachable model.
-igor
On Thu, Oct 2, 2008 at 10:54 AM, Jürgen Lind [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks for the explanation. Still, one questions remains: is there
a fundamental problem with the first approach or is it ok to use
the object directly?
J.
Igor Vaynberg wrote:
final TestItem itemModel = (TestItem) item.getModelObject();
^ on this line you retrieve the object from the model, you then use
this reference inside the onclick() which is called during another
request. since you use the model object reference directly it is not
loaded from the model.
my code, on the other hand, never keeps a direct reference to the
model object, instead it retrieves it from the model inside onclick()
-igor
On Thu, Oct 2, 2008 at 10:10 AM, Jürgen Lind [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Igor Vaynberg wrote:
your link works on the object and not on the model, instead
add(new link(delete, item.getmodel()) { onclick() {
delete(getmodelobject()); }});
Thank you for your quick reply.
Well the code is roughly the same(?) as in Listing 5.12 of WiA and there
a custom Model is used to illustrate the solution. However, I thought my
test would show me the problem first... Using your code above, the
effect is as expected, i.e. the wrong (new) item is returned to be
deleted.
Now, the question is, what is wrong with my first implementation?
It would seem that the problem that is solved using a custom ItemModel
does not even occur. Or does that code prevent wicket from effectively
detaching model objects and should thus be avoided? What would be the
best practice here?
J.
-igor
On Thu, Oct 2, 2008 at 9:04 AM, Jürgen Lind [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Hi there,
I have been struggling for some time now to understand how
LoadableDetachableModel and a ListView work together. The starting
point
was Chapter 5.5.2 of Wicket in Action where it is recommended to
provide
your own ItemModel if the underlying list changes frequently. To try
out
how Wicket behaves without such a custom ItemModel, I wrote the
following
Test:
body
em wicket:id=listview
span wicket:id=label/spana wicket:id=deletedelete/a
/em
/body
LoadableDetachableModel model = new LoadableDetachableModel() {
@Override
protected Object load() {
System.out.println(load);
return Arrays.asList(new TestItem[] {
new TestItem(a + Math.random()),
new TestItem(b + Math.random()),
new TestItem(c + Math.random()) });
}
protected void onDetach() {
System.out.println(detach);
}
};
ListView listview = new ListView(listview, model) {
protected void populateItem(ListItem item) {
final TestItem itemModel = (TestItem) item.getModelObject();
item.add(new Label(label, itemModel.toString()));
item.add(new Link(delete) {
@Override
public void onClick() {
System.out.println(Delete + itemModel);
}
});
}
};
add(listview);
Now, I would expect that when I hit the delete link, Wicket would
call
the
load Method of the LoadableDetachableModel before printing
Delete...
as
the
default implementation will use the index and the list to determine the
item
to
delete. To my surprise, however, the Delete... message is printed
with
the
correct item and the load Method is called afterwards. In my
understanding,
this contradicts the idea of the LoadableDetachableModel since Wicket
seems
to
have a copy of the original list somewhere so that it can determine the
list
item on which the action was invoked before loading the underlying
list.
Can someone spot my mistake?
Thanks,
J.
--
Dr. Jürgen Lind
iteratec GmbHFon: +49 (0)89 614551-44
Inselkammerstrasse 4 Fax: +49 (0)89 614551-10
82008 Unterhaching Web: www.iteratec.de
Sitz und Registergericht der iteratec GmbH: München HRB 113 519
Geschäftsführer: Klaus Eberhardt, Mark Goerke, Inge Hanschke, Ralf
Menzel
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Dr. Jürgen Lind
iteratec GmbHFon: +49 (0)89 614551-44
Inselkammerstrasse 4 Fax: +49 (0)89 614551-10
82008 Unterhaching Web: www.iteratec.de
Sitz und Registergericht der iteratec GmbH: München HRB 113 519
Geschäftsführer: Klaus Eberhardt, Mark Goerke, Inge Hanschke, Ralf Menzel
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To
Re: Pure client side validation
saw this lib: http://yav.sourceforge.net/ maybe it fits better? Nino Saturnino Martinez Vazquez Wael wrote: Ahh ok, I get you. So I guess IVisitor would be very good to use here.. Visit every component and put according js validation in there depending on which validator etc... Could be something I would look into at some point.. Maybe the way would be to upgrade the fvalidate integration to current wicket version? harrypitt wrote: Ok, my question was not clear enough. With Pure client side validation i mean a javascript validation which needs no ajax requests. Of course there should be always a server side validation and the whole default Wicket form-handling AFTER the submit. It would be really stupid to just rely on javascript validation. Nino.Martinez wrote: I wont be doing pure client side validation, as it is unsafe.. -- -Wicket for love Nino Martinez Wael Java Specialist @ Jayway DK http://www.jayway.dk +45 2936 7684 - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Problem understanding LoadableDetachableModel and ListViews
I see. So for a small application with few users, the approach might be
ok if I can live with a higher memory consumption. For larger
applications, using a loadable detachable model would be preferable.
Thank you for the clarification.
J.
Igor Vaynberg wrote:
yes, there is a huge fundamental problem with your approach: you keep
the object reference which means the object is serialized instead of
being retrieved through a loadable detachable model.
-igor
On Thu, Oct 2, 2008 at 10:54 AM, Jürgen Lind [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks for the explanation. Still, one questions remains: is there
a fundamental problem with the first approach or is it ok to use
the object directly?
J.
Igor Vaynberg wrote:
final TestItem itemModel = (TestItem) item.getModelObject();
^ on this line you retrieve the object from the model, you then use
this reference inside the onclick() which is called during another
request. since you use the model object reference directly it is not
loaded from the model.
my code, on the other hand, never keeps a direct reference to the
model object, instead it retrieves it from the model inside onclick()
-igor
On Thu, Oct 2, 2008 at 10:10 AM, Jürgen Lind [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Igor Vaynberg wrote:
your link works on the object and not on the model, instead
add(new link(delete, item.getmodel()) { onclick() {
delete(getmodelobject()); }});
Thank you for your quick reply.
Well the code is roughly the same(?) as in Listing 5.12 of WiA and there
a custom Model is used to illustrate the solution. However, I thought my
test would show me the problem first... Using your code above, the
effect is as expected, i.e. the wrong (new) item is returned to be
deleted.
Now, the question is, what is wrong with my first implementation?
It would seem that the problem that is solved using a custom ItemModel
does not even occur. Or does that code prevent wicket from effectively
detaching model objects and should thus be avoided? What would be the
best practice here?
J.
-igor
On Thu, Oct 2, 2008 at 9:04 AM, Jürgen Lind [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Hi there,
I have been struggling for some time now to understand how
LoadableDetachableModel and a ListView work together. The starting
point
was Chapter 5.5.2 of Wicket in Action where it is recommended to
provide
your own ItemModel if the underlying list changes frequently. To try
out
how Wicket behaves without such a custom ItemModel, I wrote the
following
Test:
body
em wicket:id=listview
span wicket:id=label/spana wicket:id=deletedelete/a
/em
/body
LoadableDetachableModel model = new LoadableDetachableModel() {
@Override
protected Object load() {
System.out.println(load);
return Arrays.asList(new TestItem[] {
new TestItem(a + Math.random()),
new TestItem(b + Math.random()),
new TestItem(c + Math.random()) });
}
protected void onDetach() {
System.out.println(detach);
}
};
ListView listview = new ListView(listview, model) {
protected void populateItem(ListItem item) {
final TestItem itemModel = (TestItem) item.getModelObject();
item.add(new Label(label, itemModel.toString()));
item.add(new Link(delete) {
@Override
public void onClick() {
System.out.println(Delete + itemModel);
}
});
}
};
add(listview);
Now, I would expect that when I hit the delete link, Wicket would
call
the
load Method of the LoadableDetachableModel before printing
Delete...
as
the
default implementation will use the index and the list to determine the
item
to
delete. To my surprise, however, the Delete... message is printed
with
the
correct item and the load Method is called afterwards. In my
understanding,
this contradicts the idea of the LoadableDetachableModel since Wicket
seems
to
have a copy of the original list somewhere so that it can determine the
list
item on which the action was invoked before loading the underlying
list.
Can someone spot my mistake?
Thanks,
J.
--
Dr. Jürgen Lind
iteratec GmbHFon: +49 (0)89 614551-44
Inselkammerstrasse 4 Fax: +49 (0)89 614551-10
82008 Unterhaching Web: www.iteratec.de
Sitz und Registergericht der iteratec GmbH: München HRB 113 519
Geschäftsführer: Klaus Eberhardt, Mark Goerke, Inge Hanschke, Ralf
Menzel
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Dr. Jürgen Lind
iteratec GmbHFon: +49 (0)89 614551-44
Inselkammerstrasse 4 Fax: +49 (0)89 614551-10
82008 Unterhaching Web: www.iteratec.de
Sitz und Registergericht der iteratec GmbH: München HRB 113 519
Geschäftsführer: Klaus Eberhardt, Mark Goerke, Inge Hanschke, Ralf Menzel
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL
Re: Problem understanding LoadableDetachableModel and ListViews
using an LDM is best practice, big or small...
-igor
On Thu, Oct 2, 2008 at 11:09 AM, Jürgen Lind [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I see. So for a small application with few users, the approach might be
ok if I can live with a higher memory consumption. For larger
applications, using a loadable detachable model would be preferable.
Thank you for the clarification.
J.
Igor Vaynberg wrote:
yes, there is a huge fundamental problem with your approach: you keep
the object reference which means the object is serialized instead of
being retrieved through a loadable detachable model.
-igor
On Thu, Oct 2, 2008 at 10:54 AM, Jürgen Lind [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Thanks for the explanation. Still, one questions remains: is there
a fundamental problem with the first approach or is it ok to use
the object directly?
J.
Igor Vaynberg wrote:
final TestItem itemModel = (TestItem) item.getModelObject();
^ on this line you retrieve the object from the model, you then use
this reference inside the onclick() which is called during another
request. since you use the model object reference directly it is not
loaded from the model.
my code, on the other hand, never keeps a direct reference to the
model object, instead it retrieves it from the model inside onclick()
-igor
On Thu, Oct 2, 2008 at 10:10 AM, Jürgen Lind [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Igor Vaynberg wrote:
your link works on the object and not on the model, instead
add(new link(delete, item.getmodel()) { onclick() {
delete(getmodelobject()); }});
Thank you for your quick reply.
Well the code is roughly the same(?) as in Listing 5.12 of WiA and
there
a custom Model is used to illustrate the solution. However, I thought
my
test would show me the problem first... Using your code above, the
effect is as expected, i.e. the wrong (new) item is returned to be
deleted.
Now, the question is, what is wrong with my first implementation?
It would seem that the problem that is solved using a custom ItemModel
does not even occur. Or does that code prevent wicket from effectively
detaching model objects and should thus be avoided? What would be the
best practice here?
J.
-igor
On Thu, Oct 2, 2008 at 9:04 AM, Jürgen Lind [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Hi there,
I have been struggling for some time now to understand how
LoadableDetachableModel and a ListView work together. The starting
point
was Chapter 5.5.2 of Wicket in Action where it is recommended to
provide
your own ItemModel if the underlying list changes frequently. To try
out
how Wicket behaves without such a custom ItemModel, I wrote the
following
Test:
body
em wicket:id=listview
span wicket:id=label/spana wicket:id=deletedelete/a
/em
/body
LoadableDetachableModel model = new LoadableDetachableModel() {
@Override
protected Object load() {
System.out.println(load);
return Arrays.asList(new TestItem[] {
new TestItem(a + Math.random()),
new TestItem(b + Math.random()),
new TestItem(c + Math.random()) });
}
protected void onDetach() {
System.out.println(detach);
}
};
ListView listview = new ListView(listview, model) {
protected void populateItem(ListItem item) {
final TestItem itemModel = (TestItem) item.getModelObject();
item.add(new Label(label, itemModel.toString()));
item.add(new Link(delete) {
@Override
public void onClick() {
System.out.println(Delete + itemModel);
}
});
}
};
add(listview);
Now, I would expect that when I hit the delete link, Wicket would
call
the
load Method of the LoadableDetachableModel before printing
Delete...
as
the
default implementation will use the index and the list to determine
the
item
to
delete. To my surprise, however, the Delete... message is printed
with
the
correct item and the load Method is called afterwards. In my
understanding,
this contradicts the idea of the LoadableDetachableModel since Wicket
seems
to
have a copy of the original list somewhere so that it can determine
the
list
item on which the action was invoked before loading the underlying
list.
Can someone spot my mistake?
Thanks,
J.
--
Dr. Jürgen Lind
iteratec GmbHFon: +49 (0)89 614551-44
Inselkammerstrasse 4 Fax: +49 (0)89 614551-10
82008 Unterhaching Web: www.iteratec.de
Sitz und Registergericht der iteratec GmbH: München HRB 113 519
Geschäftsführer: Klaus Eberhardt, Mark Goerke, Inge Hanschke, Ralf
Menzel
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Dr. Jürgen Lind
iteratec GmbHFon: +49 (0)89 614551-44
Inselkammerstrasse 4 Fax: +49 (0)89 614551-10
82008 Unterhaching Web:
Re: Form GET doesn't call onSubmit method
Hi Eyal,
Let me translate Igor's reponse (which I agree is somewhat short for the
uninitiated ;) )
Quickstart is the optimum way to start with Wicket. For more info see
http://wicket.apache.org/quickstart.html.
A quickstart is an as small as possible Wicket application that
demonstrates a bug and was created with Quickstart.
Igor's question also indicates he thinks there is a bug. You can file
the bug by creating an issue in Wicket's bug tracking system at:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET. The quickstart should be
attached to the created issue.
Regards,
Erik.
eyalbenamram wrote:
Hi
How? what is a quickstart?
I am using wicket 1.3.4 is it still not fixed there?
igor.vaynberg wrote:
create a quickstart and attach it to a jira issue
-igor
On Thu, Oct 2, 2008 at 7:09 AM, eyalbenamram [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Hi,
I have a form that overrides the method:
protected String getMethod() {
return Form.METHOD_GET;
}
When the form is submitted, the onSubmit method is never called and I
am routed to the home page instead of the location I specified. Any
suggestions??
Thanks, Eyal.
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Form-GET-doesn%27t-call-onSubmit-method-tp19780009p19780009.html
Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Erik van Oosten
http://www.day-to-day-stuff.blogspot.com/
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Inmethod grid with more edit controls
I'm just getting started with inmethod grid and loving what it does so far. Now I'd like some to use other input controls such as checkbox, radiobutton, datepicker, or ChoiceList. I see EditablePropertyColumn has newCellPanel I could override to return Panels with various input component types in edit mode. Before I embark on this, does anyone have other ideas about how to approach this? Panels could benefit from the way TextFieldPanel puts feedback into title, which suggests to me a new class such as AbstractEditablePropertyColumn where this could be moved. I also notice that CheckBoxColumn has the concern of being a row-selector that could be separated into RowSelectingCheckBoxColumn, for example (leaving the name CheckBoxColumn available as the obvious choice for editing any boolean column). I also like the idea of the light-weight propertycolumn (currently newCell just puts value into response) to use these same corresponding panels in disabled mode - maybe for radio and checkbox render the corresponding control markup as disabled (display-only) to retain the light-weightness but also have a richer display. I know that's a lot to ask, but it seems a reasonable target to aim for... Thoughts? Thanks, -- Jim.
RE: Form submit to bookmarkable page
Wow! Seems to be a good starting point. I'm using wicket for 2 years now but
still got a lot to learn. Sigh!
Now I have a form with a simple submit button. In the Form's onComponentTag I
have
tag.put(action, urlFor(TargetPage.class, parameters));
The URL now looks like
http://mysite.com/myapp/TargetPage
That's a great leap forward. But is there any trick to have the Form's input
fields as parameters in the URL? If the Form e.g. has an InputField called
parameter the URL should look like
http://mysite.com/myapp/TargetPage/parameter/value
or somethind similar? I have tried several URL encodings but all oft hem led
tot he result
http://mysite.com/myapp/TargetPage
Stefan
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Igor Vaynberg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gesendet: Donnerstag, 2. Oktober 2008 18:06
An: users@wicket.apache.org
Betreff: Re: Form submit to bookmarkable page
you can override form's oncomponenttag() and call super then
tag.put(action, urlfor(yourpage.class));
i believe that should work
-igor
On Thu, Oct 2, 2008 at 8:41 AM, Stefan Lindner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is it possible to submit a form to a bookmarkable page (with form input
as page parameters)?
What I want is a form with a submit button/link that leads to a page
with e.g. URl
http://mysite.com/myapp/targetPage/param1/value1/param2/value2
Of course I mount the submit link#s target page class in
Application.init() { mountBookmarkablePage (targetPage,
MyTargetPage.class); }
Any hint?
Stefan
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wicket 1.3.4 - setDefaultFormProcessing(true) not solving the GoAndClearFilter problem
I have looked at the other posts people have made about this problem and each
says that the solution is to call setDefaultFormProcessing(true) on the
clear button. I have done that and it doesn't solve my problem. I started
with wicket 1.3.2 but I saw where a bug fix for this was in 1.3.3 so now I
am using 1.3.4. I am doing this in a modal window but I don't know if that
has anything to do with the problem. Here is my code:
new FilteredAbstractColumn(new Model())
{
private static final long
serialVersionUID = 1L;
public void populateItem(Item
cellItem, String componentId, IModel rowModel)
{
cellItem.add(new
WebMarkupContainer(componentId, new Model()));
}
public Component getFilter(String
id, FilterForm form)
{
GoAndClearFilter filter =
new GoAndClearFilter(id, form)
{
private static final
long serialVersionUID = 1L;
@Override
protected Button
getClearButton()
{
Button
result = super.getClearButton();
result.setDefaultFormProcessing(true);
return
result;
}
};
return filter;
}
}
};
Thanks
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/wicket-1.3.4---setDefaultFormProcessing%28true%29-not-solving-the-GoAndClearFilter-problem-tp19786310p19786310.html
Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
How to update ListChoice after form submission?
I have a page with a ListChoice of user names that is populated with a call to our server (loadUserNames()). The page also contains a number of TextFields corresponding to the user's other attributes. When you modify those text fields so the user name doesn't correspond to anything in the list, the Add AjaxFallbackButton enables. Click this, and you make a call to the server which creates the new user. The new user does not show up in the ListChoice. If you refresh the page, it does, so we know it's created, and we know that loadUserNames() will return the correct list if it were called and its values were used.. I want the new user name to show up in the ListChoice after submission, and I'd like to be able to set the selection in the ListChoice to the new user. I've tried giving the ListChoice a LoadableDetachableModel, I've tried giving it an ArrayList model with a call to loadUserNames() and setChoices() on the ListChoice after submission, I've tried a AjaxFormComponentUpdatingBehavior( onsubmit ), hoping this might fire after submission, I've tried using a call to getRequestCycleSettings().setRenderStrategy(IRequestCycleSettings.ONE_PASS_RENDER) in my application class's init() method, I've tried a ton of things and I can't figure this out. Any ideas? -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/How-to-update-ListChoice-after-form-submission--tp19786374p19786374.html Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [XHTML validation] Rootless AbstractTree outputs empty table table .../table
I have filed a JIRA improvement ticket for this: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-1856 Kaspar On 17.09.2008, at 11:12, Kaspar Fischer wrote: I have a rootless BaseTree and see it output table style=display:none id=tree1f_0/tabletable class=wicket-tree-content id=tree1f_1tr... which according to http://validator.w3.org is invalid strict XHTML. Looking at the comment in the code, AbstractTree.onRender(), it appears that the indention there is to output a div and not a table, which would validate: div style=display:none id=tree1f_0/divtable class=wicket- tree-content id=tree1f_1tr... Or was there a particular reason to fetch the tagName from the markupStream in the code, instead of just hardcoding it to div? Thanks, Kaspar - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Form submit to bookmarkable page
if anything you can change the form.getmethod() to return GET, but
even then it is the browser that will be doing the encoding and
construcing the final url.
if you really want a clean url like that you will have to use a
regular form and in onsubmit construct the url and redirect to it.
-igor
On Thu, Oct 2, 2008 at 12:27 PM, Stefan Lindner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Wow! Seems to be a good starting point. I'm using wicket for 2 years now but
still got a lot to learn. Sigh!
Now I have a form with a simple submit button. In the Form's onComponentTag I
have
tag.put(action, urlFor(TargetPage.class, parameters));
The URL now looks like
http://mysite.com/myapp/TargetPage
That's a great leap forward. But is there any trick to have the Form's input
fields as parameters in the URL? If the Form e.g. has an InputField called
parameter the URL should look like
http://mysite.com/myapp/TargetPage/parameter/value
or somethind similar? I have tried several URL encodings but all oft hem led
tot he result
http://mysite.com/myapp/TargetPage
Stefan
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Igor Vaynberg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gesendet: Donnerstag, 2. Oktober 2008 18:06
An: users@wicket.apache.org
Betreff: Re: Form submit to bookmarkable page
you can override form's oncomponenttag() and call super then
tag.put(action, urlfor(yourpage.class));
i believe that should work
-igor
On Thu, Oct 2, 2008 at 8:41 AM, Stefan Lindner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is it possible to submit a form to a bookmarkable page (with form input
as page parameters)?
What I want is a form with a submit button/link that leads to a page
with e.g. URl
http://mysite.com/myapp/targetPage/param1/value1/param2/value2
Of course I mount the submit link#s target page class in
Application.init() { mountBookmarkablePage (targetPage,
MyTargetPage.class); }
Any hint?
Stefan
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: How to update ListChoice after form submission?
inside the onclick of your ajaxfallbackbutton you have to add the listchoice to the target so wicket rerenders it -igor On Thu, Oct 2, 2008 at 12:49 PM, Seven Corners [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I have a page with a ListChoice of user names that is populated with a call to our server (loadUserNames()). The page also contains a number of TextFields corresponding to the user's other attributes. When you modify those text fields so the user name doesn't correspond to anything in the list, the Add AjaxFallbackButton enables. Click this, and you make a call to the server which creates the new user. The new user does not show up in the ListChoice. If you refresh the page, it does, so we know it's created, and we know that loadUserNames() will return the correct list if it were called and its values were used.. I want the new user name to show up in the ListChoice after submission, and I'd like to be able to set the selection in the ListChoice to the new user. I've tried giving the ListChoice a LoadableDetachableModel, I've tried giving it an ArrayList model with a call to loadUserNames() and setChoices() on the ListChoice after submission, I've tried a AjaxFormComponentUpdatingBehavior( onsubmit ), hoping this might fire after submission, I've tried using a call to getRequestCycleSettings().setRenderStrategy(IRequestCycleSettings.ONE_PASS_RENDER) in my application class's init() method, I've tried a ton of things and I can't figure this out. Any ideas? -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/How-to-update-ListChoice-after-form-submission--tp19786374p19786374.html Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Form submit to bookmarkable page
OK. But how to
and in onsubmit construct the url and redirect to it.
The only methods for redirects I know are the redirectToInterceptPage method or
the setResponsePage methods. An each method needs a page class as parameter an
not a self constructed url. I did not find a auitable method in the requestCyle.
How can I set the URL for the response?
Stefan
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Igor Vaynberg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gesendet: Donnerstag, 2. Oktober 2008 22:40
An: users@wicket.apache.org
Betreff: Re: Form submit to bookmarkable page
if anything you can change the form.getmethod() to return GET, but
even then it is the browser that will be doing the encoding and
construcing the final url.
if you really want a clean url like that you will have to use a
regular form and in onsubmit construct the url and redirect to it.
-igor
On Thu, Oct 2, 2008 at 12:27 PM, Stefan Lindner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Wow! Seems to be a good starting point. I'm using wicket for 2 years now but
still got a lot to learn. Sigh!
Now I have a form with a simple submit button. In the Form's onComponentTag I
have
tag.put(action, urlFor(TargetPage.class, parameters));
The URL now looks like
http://mysite.com/myapp/TargetPage
That's a great leap forward. But is there any trick to have the Form's input
fields as parameters in the URL? If the Form e.g. has an InputField called
parameter the URL should look like
http://mysite.com/myapp/TargetPage/parameter/value
or somethind similar? I have tried several URL encodings but all oft hem led
tot he result
http://mysite.com/myapp/TargetPage
Stefan
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Igor Vaynberg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gesendet: Donnerstag, 2. Oktober 2008 18:06
An: users@wicket.apache.org
Betreff: Re: Form submit to bookmarkable page
you can override form's oncomponenttag() and call super then
tag.put(action, urlfor(yourpage.class));
i believe that should work
-igor
On Thu, Oct 2, 2008 at 8:41 AM, Stefan Lindner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is it possible to submit a form to a bookmarkable page (with form input
as page parameters)?
What I want is a form with a submit button/link that leads to a page
with e.g. URl
http://mysite.com/myapp/targetPage/param1/value1/param2/value2
Of course I mount the submit link#s target page class in
Application.init() { mountBookmarkablePage (targetPage,
MyTargetPage.class); }
Any hint?
Stefan
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Form submit to bookmarkable page
onsubmit() {
getRequestCycle().setRequestTarget(new RedirectRequestTarget(myurl));
}
-igor
On Thu, Oct 2, 2008 at 2:12 PM, Stefan Lindner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
OK. But how to
and in onsubmit construct the url and redirect to it.
The only methods for redirects I know are the redirectToInterceptPage method
or the setResponsePage methods. An each method needs a page class as
parameter an not a self constructed url. I did not find a auitable method in
the requestCyle.
How can I set the URL for the response?
Stefan
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Igor Vaynberg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gesendet: Donnerstag, 2. Oktober 2008 22:40
An: users@wicket.apache.org
Betreff: Re: Form submit to bookmarkable page
if anything you can change the form.getmethod() to return GET, but
even then it is the browser that will be doing the encoding and
construcing the final url.
if you really want a clean url like that you will have to use a
regular form and in onsubmit construct the url and redirect to it.
-igor
On Thu, Oct 2, 2008 at 12:27 PM, Stefan Lindner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Wow! Seems to be a good starting point. I'm using wicket for 2 years now but
still got a lot to learn. Sigh!
Now I have a form with a simple submit button. In the Form's onComponentTag
I have
tag.put(action, urlFor(TargetPage.class, parameters));
The URL now looks like
http://mysite.com/myapp/TargetPage
That's a great leap forward. But is there any trick to have the Form's input
fields as parameters in the URL? If the Form e.g. has an InputField called
parameter the URL should look like
http://mysite.com/myapp/TargetPage/parameter/value
or somethind similar? I have tried several URL encodings but all oft hem led
tot he result
http://mysite.com/myapp/TargetPage
Stefan
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Igor Vaynberg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gesendet: Donnerstag, 2. Oktober 2008 18:06
An: users@wicket.apache.org
Betreff: Re: Form submit to bookmarkable page
you can override form's oncomponenttag() and call super then
tag.put(action, urlfor(yourpage.class));
i believe that should work
-igor
On Thu, Oct 2, 2008 at 8:41 AM, Stefan Lindner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is it possible to submit a form to a bookmarkable page (with form input
as page parameters)?
What I want is a form with a submit button/link that leads to a page
with e.g. URl
http://mysite.com/myapp/targetPage/param1/value1/param2/value2
Of course I mount the submit link#s target page class in
Application.init() { mountBookmarkablePage (targetPage,
MyTargetPage.class); }
Any hint?
Stefan
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Form submit to bookmarkable page
The solution, if anybody else should encounter this problem ist to put the following into the onSubmitMethod PageParameters p = new PageParameters(); p.add(myParameterName, getModelObjectOfFormComponent()); getResponse().redirect(urlFor(MyTargetPage.class, p).toString()); getRequestCycle().setRedirect(false); and mount the page as bookmarkable page in Application.init(). Then the resulting URL is http://myApp/MyTargetPage/myParameterName/value Stefan - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Form submit to bookmarkable page
Thank you Igor for your patience and your code fragments.
Stefan
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Igor Vaynberg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gesendet: Donnerstag, 2. Oktober 2008 23:20
An: users@wicket.apache.org
Betreff: Re: Form submit to bookmarkable page
onsubmit() {
getRequestCycle().setRequestTarget(new RedirectRequestTarget(myurl));
}
-igor
On Thu, Oct 2, 2008 at 2:12 PM, Stefan Lindner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
OK. But how to
and in onsubmit construct the url and redirect to it.
The only methods for redirects I know are the redirectToInterceptPage method
or the setResponsePage methods. An each method needs a page class as
parameter an not a self constructed url. I did not find a auitable method in
the requestCyle.
How can I set the URL for the response?
Stefan
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Igor Vaynberg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gesendet: Donnerstag, 2. Oktober 2008 22:40
An: users@wicket.apache.org
Betreff: Re: Form submit to bookmarkable page
if anything you can change the form.getmethod() to return GET, but
even then it is the browser that will be doing the encoding and
construcing the final url.
if you really want a clean url like that you will have to use a
regular form and in onsubmit construct the url and redirect to it.
-igor
On Thu, Oct 2, 2008 at 12:27 PM, Stefan Lindner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Wow! Seems to be a good starting point. I'm using wicket for 2 years now but
still got a lot to learn. Sigh!
Now I have a form with a simple submit button. In the Form's onComponentTag
I have
tag.put(action, urlFor(TargetPage.class, parameters));
The URL now looks like
http://mysite.com/myapp/TargetPage
That's a great leap forward. But is there any trick to have the Form's input
fields as parameters in the URL? If the Form e.g. has an InputField called
parameter the URL should look like
http://mysite.com/myapp/TargetPage/parameter/value
or somethind similar? I have tried several URL encodings but all oft hem led
tot he result
http://mysite.com/myapp/TargetPage
Stefan
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Igor Vaynberg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gesendet: Donnerstag, 2. Oktober 2008 18:06
An: users@wicket.apache.org
Betreff: Re: Form submit to bookmarkable page
you can override form's oncomponenttag() and call super then
tag.put(action, urlfor(yourpage.class));
i believe that should work
-igor
On Thu, Oct 2, 2008 at 8:41 AM, Stefan Lindner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is it possible to submit a form to a bookmarkable page (with form input
as page parameters)?
What I want is a form with a submit button/link that leads to a page
with e.g. URl
http://mysite.com/myapp/targetPage/param1/value1/param2/value2
Of course I mount the submit link#s target page class in
Application.init() { mountBookmarkablePage (targetPage,
MyTargetPage.class); }
Any hint?
Stefan
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
URL to fetch one component
Hi, I would like to return the markup of a rendered wicket component when accessing a certain URL. I do not want to return a page, only one single component in that page (like how AJAX works, kinda). Here is my plan: - Handle the Request - Create a new component - Add it to the page - Call component.renderComponent(); - Somehow get a stream from MarkupContainer.getMarkupStream() - Use Response.write(InputStream) to return the component markup. Will that work in your experience? -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/URL-to-fetch-one-component-tp19790610p19790610.html Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: URL to fetch one component
much easier to create a generic page that can contain any component, add it to there, and render the page -igor On Thu, Oct 2, 2008 at 6:11 PM, metalotus [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, I would like to return the markup of a rendered wicket component when accessing a certain URL. I do not want to return a page, only one single component in that page (like how AJAX works, kinda). Here is my plan: - Handle the Request - Create a new component - Add it to the page - Call component.renderComponent(); - Somehow get a stream from MarkupContainer.getMarkupStream() - Use Response.write(InputStream) to return the component markup. Will that work in your experience? -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/URL-to-fetch-one-component-tp19790610p19790610.html Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: URL to fetch one component
ok, thanks for the tip igor.vaynberg wrote: much easier to create a generic page that can contain any component, add it to there, and render the page -igor On Thu, Oct 2, 2008 at 6:11 PM, metalotus [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, I would like to return the markup of a rendered wicket component when accessing a certain URL. I do not want to return a page, only one single component in that page (like how AJAX works, kinda). Here is my plan: - Handle the Request - Create a new component - Add it to the page - Call component.renderComponent(); - Somehow get a stream from MarkupContainer.getMarkupStream() - Use Response.write(InputStream) to return the component markup. Will that work in your experience? -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/URL-to-fetch-one-component-tp19790610p19790610.html Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/URL-to-fetch-one-component-tp19790610p19790766.html Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: wicket and hibernate
You said you were using annotations. Just read chapter 1 of the hibernate annotations docs http://www.hibernate.org/hib_docs/annotations/reference/en/html_single/#setup-configuration create a class called HibernateUtil.class (or you can call it Fluffy.class, but that's not as descriptive) and add a static SessionFactory. public static final SessionFactory sessionFactory; Then add an initialize method to add your annotated classes with this: AnnotationConfiguration cfg = new AnnotationConfiguration(); cfg.configure(); sessionFactory = cfg .setInterceptor(new AuditInterceptor()) .addAnnotatedClass(User.class) //others as needed .buildSessionFactory(); The WebApplication object for your project has an init() method. You can call the above method from there. When wicket starts up, it will call that init() method first, so you can do things like setup your app. Or just wrap the above in a static block and you don't have to worry about it. The first time you access the HibernateUtil, the class loader will run the static block. Then in your methods you can just get a connection from the pool. Session session = HibernateUtil.sessionFactory.openSession(); I do this a little differently than hibernate examples. In the service, I open the connection, get all the data I need and close the connection at the end of the method. The way Hibernate works is when your working thread gets a connection, hibernate attaches that connection to the thread. So throughout the lifecycle you can make references to related objects and hibernate will go fetch them for you. I don't like that technique, personally. HTH -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/wicket-and-hibernate-tp19767474p19791416.html Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Client side validation behaviors - already started?
I've been thinking of trying to create some behaviors that combine the standard server-side validation with client-side validation. I just wanted to check to see if anyone knew of something like this already started. I don't want to duplicate work already done. Thanks, -- Jeremy Thomerson http://www.wickettraining.com
DefaultDataTable attached to a model in a form
Hi, I have a form with some fields attached to some properties of a model,
so when I change the model all the fields also changes. Up to that
everything goes perfect, the problem I'm having is that I need to maintain a
DefaultDataTable in the form with the data of a list that the model has. I
don't know how to fill that table with the list property of the model.
Here I paste the code:
public InvoiceForm(String name, InvoiceModel model){
super(name, new CompoundPropertyModelInvoiceModel(model));
TextFieldString orderNumber = new TextFieldString(number, new
PropertyModelString(model, number));
add(orderNumber);
TextFieldString customerTxt = new TextFieldString(customerStr,
new PropertyModelString(model, customerStr));
add(customerTxt);
TextFieldString totalTxt = new TextFieldString(total, new
PropertyModelString(model, total));
add(totalTxt);
ListIColumn? columns = new ArrayListIColumn?();
columns.add(new PropertyColumn(new ModelString(Name), name));columns.add(new DateColumn(new
ModelString(Upload Date), uploadDate, uploadDate));
columns.add(new PropertyColumn(new ModelString(Quote), quote,
quote));
ListDocument docs = model.getDocuments();
DefaultDataTable table = new DefaultDataTable(items, columns, new
SortableDocumentDataProvider(docs), 8);
add(table);
}
The way I'm linking the table with the form is wrong, I would like to know
how I can solved this
Thanks
Pablo
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
