wicket 1.4
Hi, When will wicket 1.4 GA Release.. Regards, Srinivasa Raju CH. Get your world in your inbox! Mail, widgets, documents, spreadsheets, organizer and much more with your Sifymail WIYI id! Log on to http://www.sify.com ** DISCLAIMER ** Information contained and transmitted by this E-MAIL is proprietary to Sify Limited and is intended for use only by the individual or entity to which it is addressed, and may contain information that is privileged, confidential or exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If this is a forwarded message, the content of this E-MAIL may not have been sent with the authority of the Company. If you are not the intended recipient, an agent of the intended recipient or a person responsible for delivering the information to the named recipient, you are notified that any use, distribution, transmission, printing, copying or dissemination of this information in any way or in any manner is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please delete this mail notify us immediately at ad...@sifycorp.com - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: [vote] In Wicket 1.4 and onwards, remove widening from the list of choices model in DropDownChoice, changing it from IModelList? extends Foo to IModelListFoo
[X] Yes, change the DropDownChoice constructor to take the choices list as IModelListT or ListT without the wildcard Regards, Daan - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: [AjaxTabbedPanel] Switching between form and result tab
Thanks for the advice Igor.
I passed the actual values to the second tab (via the submit method of the
form) just to see if it's working.
So I guess that in the onSubmit method of the form, it's better to pass a
model than an object
public class GererMesLignesUnitForm extends Form {
...
protected void onSubmit() {
Object newObject = createNewObjectFromRequest();
/* Previous call
* GererMesLignesUnitPage pageResultat = new
GererMesLignesUnitPage(1, newObject);
*/
GererMesLignesUnitPage pageResultat = new
GererMesLignesUnitPage(1, newModelFromNewObject);
setResponsePage(pageResultat);
}
}
But that doesn't resolve my problem. How can I keep the input in the form
of the first tab in this case :
- User fill the form on the first tab
- User submit the form on the first tab
- application do the search using the form input and show the result on
the second tab with
- User want to the same search with more criteria so he switch back on the
first tab
- User have to fill back all his criteria ... === How can I keep them ?
- Should I pass the model of the form and the model of the result in the
onSubmit() method ?
- If not, do I use correctly the PanelCachingTab in my previous example ?
De :
Igor Vaynberg igor.vaynb...@gmail.com
A:
users@wicket.apache.org
Date:
27/02/2009 18:08
Objet :
Re: [AjaxTabbedPanel] Switching between form and result tab
p.add(new Label(statut, demande.getStatut()));
^ you should use models instead of passing it actual values, that way
your data doesnt get out of sync.
see the models page on the wiki
-igor
2009/2/27 valery.ch...@steria.com:
I've already try that. It didn't work.
But maybe I'm doing something wrong ...
Here's the page code :
private DemandeUnitaire demande;
private GererMesLignesUnitForm myForm;
private AjaxTabbedPanel tabPanel;
private Panel currentPanel;
public GererMesLignesUnitPage(int selectedTab, Object infosToShow) {
if (selectedTab == 1)
demande = (DemandeUnitaire) infosToShow;
myForm = new GererMesLignesUnitForm(recherche, new
CompoundPropertyModel
(new DemandeUnitaire()));
List tabs = new ArrayList();
tabs.add(new PanelCachingTab(
new AbstractTab(new Model(first tab)) {
private static final long serialVersionUID = 1L;
public Panel getPanel(String panelId) {
Panel p = new TabPanel1(panelId);
FeedbackPanel feedback = new FeedbackPanel(msgs
);
p.add(feedback);
p.add(myForm);
return p;
}
}
) {
@Override
public Panel getPanel(final String panelId) {
return super.getPanel(panelId);
}
});
tabs.add(new PanelCachingTab(
new AbstractTab(new Model(second tab)) {
private static final long serialVersionUID = 1L;
public Panel getPanel(String panelId) {
Panel p = new TabPanel2(panelId);
p.add(new Label(statut, demande.getStatut()));
p.add(new Label(numMachine, demande
.getNumMachine()));
HeaderContributor alert = new HeaderContributor(
new IHeaderContributor() {
public void
renderHead(IHeaderResponse response) {
response.renderOnLoadJavascript(onloadEvent(););
}
}
);
p.add(HeaderContributor.forJavaScript( LIB_JS ));
p.add(HeaderContributor.forJavaScript(
SHOW_HIDE_COLUMN_JS ));
p.add(alert);
return p;
}
}
) {
@Override
public Panel getPanel(final String panelId) {
return super.getPanel(panelId);
}
});
De :
Igor Vaynberg igor.vaynb...@gmail.com
A:
users@wicket.apache.org
Date:
27/02/2009 17:27
Objet :
Re: [AjaxTabbedPanel] Switching between form and result tab
use panelcachingtab instead of abstracttab
-igor
2009/2/27 valery.ch...@steria.com:
Hi,
Anyone have an idea on the matter below ?
Cheers,
Val
De :
valery.ch...@steria.com
A:
users@wicket.apache.org
Date:
26/02/2009 14:11
Objet :
[AjaxTabbedPanel] Switching between form and result tab
Hi,
I have an AjacTabbedPanel with two tabs.
The first tab is a form which, when submitted, show the result on the
second tabs.
So far, everything's fine.
I want to keep the input from the form after the submit so that the
user
can come back to the first tab and have a look at what the crierias was
and maybe to modify them to make another request.
But I need to be able switch back to the second tab and keep records of
the result
ChannelTarget 2 AjaxRequestTarget
Hi all,
I need following functionality: after receiving ChannelTarget (using cometd
server) I need open ModalDialog window on client and show some information.
For this purpose I created adapter with following methods. But in standard
wicket distribution is addJavascript declared as finall (so I have self
compiled distribution of wicked without this declaration). Is there another
way how I can do it correctly ? Or it's possible to declare this method
non-finall in wicket, or create something simillar
to ChannelTargetToAjaxRequestTargetAdapter in wicket itself ?
public class ChannelTargetToAjaxRequestTargetAdapter extends
AjaxRequestTarget {
private final IChannelTarget channelTarget;
/**
* @param target
*/
public ChannelTargetToAjaxRequestTargetAdapter(final Page page, final
IChannelTarget target) {
super(page);
this.channelTarget = target;
}
/** {...@inheritdoc} */
@Override
public void addComponent(final Component component) {
channelTarget.addComponent(component);
}
@Override
public void addJavascript(final String javascript) {
channelTarget.appendJavascript(javascript);
}
... all others methods are implemented to
throw UnsupportedOperationException
Thank you
Martin
Re: [vote] In Wicket 1.4 and onwards, remove widening from the list of choices model in DropDownChoice, changing it from IModelList? extends Foo to IModelListFoo
[X] No, keep DropDownChoice as it is in Wicket 1.4-rc2
2009/3/2 Timo Rantalaiho timo.rantala...@ri.fi:
Background:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-1512
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-2126
http://www.nabble.com/LDM-with-Generics-for-DropDownChoice-td22155211.html
This works:
= clips
public static void main(String[] args) {
Foo foo = new Foo();
foo.bar().add(new String(quux));
}
@SuppressWarnings(unchecked)
public ListString bar() {
List? extends String list = new
ArrayListString(Arrays.asList(foo, bar));
return (ListString) list;
}
= /clips ===
This doesn't work:
= claps
public static void main(String[] args) {
Foo foo = new Foo();
foo.bar().add(new String(quux));
}
public List? extends String bar() {
List? extends String list = new
ArrayListString(Arrays.asList(foo, bar));
return list;
}
= /claps ===
[ ] Yes, change the DropDownChoice constructor to take the
choices list as IModelListT or ListT without the
wildcard
[ ] No, keep DropDownChoice as it is in Wicket 1.4-rc2
Best wishes,
Timo
--
Timo Rantalaiho
Reaktor Innovations Oy URL: http://www.ri.fi/
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: [vote] In Wicket 1.4 and onwards, remove widening from the list of choices model in DropDownChoice, changing it from IModelList? extends Foo to IModelListFoo
[X] Yes, change the DropDownChoice constructor to take the choices list as IModelListT or ListT without the wildcard Maarten On Mon, Mar 2, 2009 at 9:30 AM, Daan van Etten d...@stuq.nl wrote: [X] Yes, change the DropDownChoice constructor to take the choices list as IModelListT or ListT without the wildcard Regards, Daan - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: Wicket and downloading huge pdf files
Only want to know if an url similar to: http://www.myweb.com/.../depliant.pdf with a pdf file (or similar) as suffix is possible to create in wicket. On Fri, 2009-02-27 at 10:13 +0100, Emanuele Gesuato wrote: Hi there, We have several huge pdf files with many pages (an hundred or so) and we would like to do a lazy loading of the pdf file when the user click to download it. Right now, when the user click for some pdf we return to the browser a resource stream with mime type application/pdf in which we load the file as a byte array output stream. But in this way the file is returned entirely to the user. In some web site they use an url with the the pdf file embedded to it (example: http://.../file.pdf); in this way the pdf client (adobe reader or similar) could lazy load the pages of the document. But is it a correct approach ? Is it possibile to implement something similar using a custom UrlCodingStrategy ? Thanks, Emanuele Gesuato - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: [vote] In Wicket 1.4 and onwards, remove widening from the list of choices model in DropDownChoice, changing it from IModelList? extends Foo to IModelListFoo
If we loose the wildcard is it then still possible to do everything?
We have it to be able to use a Manager List when we declare it as a
People
When you have that you have to copy it over i guess by a helper method.
I just want to know for sure that i dont miss something that if we remove it
that then something is not possible anymore
On Mon, Mar 2, 2009 at 05:26, Timo Rantalaiho timo.rantala...@ri.fi wrote:
Background:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-1512
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-2126
http://www.nabble.com/LDM-with-Generics-for-DropDownChoice-td22155211.html
This works:
= clips
public static void main(String[] args) {
Foo foo = new Foo();
foo.bar().add(new String(quux));
}
@SuppressWarnings(unchecked)
public ListString bar() {
List? extends String list = new
ArrayListString(Arrays.asList(foo, bar));
return (ListString) list;
}
= /clips ===
This doesn't work:
= claps
public static void main(String[] args) {
Foo foo = new Foo();
foo.bar().add(new String(quux));
}
public List? extends String bar() {
List? extends String list = new
ArrayListString(Arrays.asList(foo, bar));
return list;
}
= /claps ===
[ ] Yes, change the DropDownChoice constructor to take the
choices list as IModelListT or ListT without the
wildcard
[ ] No, keep DropDownChoice as it is in Wicket 1.4-rc2
Best wishes,
Timo
--
Timo Rantalaiho
Reaktor Innovations OyURL: http://www.ri.fi/
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: wicket 1.4
when it's done. Martijn On Mon, Mar 2, 2009 at 9:09 AM, SrinivasaRaju Ch srinivas.r...@sifycorp.com wrote: Hi, When will wicket 1.4 GA Release.. Regards, Srinivasa Raju CH. Get your world in your inbox! Mail, widgets, documents, spreadsheets, organizer and much more with your Sifymail WIYI id! Log on to http://www.sify.com ** DISCLAIMER ** Information contained and transmitted by this E-MAIL is proprietary to Sify Limited and is intended for use only by the individual or entity to which it is addressed, and may contain information that is privileged, confidential or exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If this is a forwarded message, the content of this E-MAIL may not have been sent with the authority of the Company. If you are not the intended recipient, an agent of the intended recipient or a person responsible for delivering the information to the named recipient, you are notified that any use, distribution, transmission, printing, copying or dissemination of this information in any way or in any manner is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please delete this mail notify us immediately at ad...@sifycorp.com - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org -- Become a Wicket expert, learn from the best: http://wicketinaction.com Apache Wicket 1.3.5 is released Get it now: http://www.apache.org/dyn/closer.cgi/wicket/1.3. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
1.4 RC2 multiple forms within a border
I'm having a page contained in a border. Both the border and the pages contain forms (adjacent not nested forms). This worked perfectly with 1.4 RC1, now with RC2 aparantly a submit in one form causes the models of both forms to be updated with the values of the submitted form. Does anybody else experience this behavior? -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/1.4-RC2---multiple-forms-within-a-border-tp22285838p22285838.html Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: 1.4 RC2 multiple forms within a border
16 hours ago: http://www.nabble.com/Multiple-Forms-in-A-Border-tp22252817p22273577.html On Mon, Mar 2, 2009 at 5:44 PM, Ron Meyers christ...@armstrongconsulting.net wrote: I'm having a page contained in a border. Both the border and the pages contain forms (adjacent not nested forms). This worked perfectly with 1.4 RC1, now with RC2 aparantly a submit in one form causes the models of both forms to be updated with the values of the submitted form. Does anybody else experience this behavior? -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/1.4-RC2---multiple-forms-within-a-border-tp22285838p22285838.html Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Why is BookmarkablePageLink generified?
Hello, I was wondering why BookmarkablePageLink has been generified. A bookmarkable link has no use for a model as far as I can see. Shall I create an issue to change the declaration of BookmarkablePageLink from: public class BookmarkablePageLinkT extends LinkT to public class BookmarkablePageLink extends LinkVoid ? Regards, Erik. -- Erik van Oosten http://day-to-day-stuff.blogspot.com/ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: Why is BookmarkablePageLink generified?
BookmarkablePageLink isn't final. A subclass could use the model. W On Mar 2, 2009, at 7:36 AM, Erik van Oosten wrote: Hello, I was wondering why BookmarkablePageLink has been generified. A bookmarkable link has no use for a model as far as I can see. Shall I create an issue to change the declaration of BookmarkablePageLink from: public class BookmarkablePageLinkT extends LinkT to public class BookmarkablePageLink extends LinkVoid ? Regards, Erik. -- Erik van Oosten http://day-to-day-stuff.blogspot.com/ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
RE: Why is BookmarkablePageLink generified?
Yes Willis, that's what we do. So we prefer to have a generic BuukmarkablePageLink. -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: Willis Blackburn [mailto:wbo...@panix.com] Gesendet: Montag, 2. März 2009 13:43 An: users@wicket.apache.org Betreff: Re: Why is BookmarkablePageLink generified? BookmarkablePageLink isn't final. A subclass could use the model. W On Mar 2, 2009, at 7:36 AM, Erik van Oosten wrote: Hello, I was wondering why BookmarkablePageLink has been generified. A bookmarkable link has no use for a model as far as I can see. Shall I create an issue to change the declaration of BookmarkablePageLink from: public class BookmarkablePageLinkT extends LinkT to public class BookmarkablePageLink extends LinkVoid ? Regards, Erik. -- Erik van Oosten http://day-to-day-stuff.blogspot.com/ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Wicket - Session Management
Hi, I have two wicket applications running in two different JVMs. If clicking on a link in the first wicket application that runs in the first JVM, is redirected to the second wicket application that runs in second JVM, What support does Wicket provide to manage the page map in the session for the first wicket application other than manually invalidating the objects in the session when redirected to the second wicket application? Moreover, I understand the state of all wicket components are maintained in the session. But does wicket provide any programmatic extension points to have the partially/fully managed on the client side? And also please help me point to good materials/articles on session management and custom session management in wicket. Thanks, Subbu. -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Wicket---Session-Management-tp22288083p22288083.html Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: Wicket - Session Management
There is a small typo in the second question. Second question is reworded as below: Does wicket provide any programmatic extension points to have the state of components managed on the client side? Thanks, Subbu. subbu_tce wrote: Hi, I have two wicket applications running in two different JVMs. If clicking on a link in the first wicket application that runs in the first JVM, is redirected to the second wicket application that runs in second JVM, What support does Wicket provide to manage the page map in the session for the first wicket application other than manually invalidating the objects in the session when redirected to the second wicket application? Moreover, I understand the state of all wicket components are maintained in the session. But does wicket provide any programmatic extension points to have the partially/fully managed on the client side? And also please help me point to good materials/articles on session management and custom session management in wicket. Thanks, Subbu. -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Wicket---Session-Management-tp22288083p22288126.html Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: Switching between markup files for borders
I would think you would be better off attaching this to a JIRA.
On Mon, Mar 2, 2009 at 3:00 AM, Anton Veretennikov
anton.veretenni...@gmail.com wrote:
Quickstart is attached.
Tested with last 1.4-SNAPSHOT.
On Sun, Mar 1, 2009 at 12:29 AM, Anton Veretennikov
anton.veretenni...@gmail.com wrote:
Hmm. Strange things I see with image paths in my borders with variants.
My page is mounted like:
mountBookmarkablePage(/getFrame, OrderPaymentPage.class);
So, when I reach my theme with:
.../getFrame?theme=white
- everything is alright.
But asking it with:
.../getFrame/theme/white
- and my border images are touching server with
.../getFrame/theme/images/bar/white/t.gif address.
So, as there is no images there, 404 Not Found is returned for them.
They must be .../images/bar/white/t.gif
Quickstart?
On Thu, Feb 26, 2009 at 2:52 PM, Anton Veretennikov
anton.veretenni...@gmail.com wrote:
Igor, I did it already :)
Jeremy suggests another approach - with no variations.
On Thu, Feb 26, 2009 at 2:48 PM, Igor Vaynberg igor.vaynb...@gmail.com
wrote:
return new roundedcornerborder(...) { string getvariation() { return
black; }};
-igor
On Wed, Feb 25, 2009 at 11:45 PM, Jeremy Thomerson
jer...@wickettraining.com wrote:
Bummer - knew it couldn't be as easy as it looked. :) I don't
suppose it's
something you could do like this, then?
Border.html
td class=foo
main_white.css
TD.foo { background-image: (/url/whiteimages/bar.jpg); }
main_black.css
TD.foo { background-image: (/url/blackimages/bar.jpg); }
As to performance, not sure I understood the question, but selecting
the
themed borders rather than normal borders doesn't slow anything
down. Is
that what you meant?
On Thu, Feb 26, 2009 at 1:15 AM, Anton Veretennikov
anton.veretenni...@gmail.com wrote:
It will be better of course, Jeremy.
My borders have differences not only in css but in images in table
cells. Images are taken from other folders depending on theme name.
Yes, I know, rounded corners can be made with pure css. But my war
with browsers is endless.
I thought about some variable that could be replaces with exact name
of theme in html part. But onComponentTagBody is final in Border
class. And I'm far from Wicket guru.
Another question is performance. When borders are many on a page
their
customazation is time consuming. Am I right?
On Thu, Feb 26, 2009 at 1:54 PM, Jeremy Thomerson
jer...@wickettraining.com wrote:
Obviously I have nothing other than the name of your file to base
this
thought on, but I'll throw it out there anyway
If the only difference between the two is color, just use localized
/
themed
css files and use a single HTML file. This will save you a ton of
code
duplication over having MyBorder_white, MyPanel_white, etc.
Maybe you already are, but I couldn't bare to see what appears to
be pain
and suffering without at least trying to help. :)
On Wed, Feb 25, 2009 at 10:13 AM, Anton Veretennikov
anton.veretenni...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi!
I have a problem with theme support for borders.
I want to exchange real markup of border depending on theme name,
for
example:
RoundedCornerBorder_black.html
RoundedCornerBorder_white.html
How to do this in Wicket?
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
--
Jeremy Thomerson
http://www.wickettraining.com
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
--
Jeremy Thomerson
http://www.wickettraining.com
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
--
Jeremy Thomerson
http://www.wickettraining.com
Re: [AjaxTabbedPanel] Switching between form and result tab
in your onsubmit you are calling setresponsepage, so you are going to
a different page, not tab?
-igor
On Mon, Mar 2, 2009 at 12:41 AM, valery.ch...@steria.com wrote:
Thanks for the advice Igor.
I passed the actual values to the second tab (via the submit method of the
form) just to see if it's working.
So I guess that in the onSubmit method of the form, it's better to pass a
model than an object
public class GererMesLignesUnitForm extends Form {
...
protected void onSubmit() {
Object newObject = createNewObjectFromRequest();
/* Previous call
* GererMesLignesUnitPage pageResultat = new
GererMesLignesUnitPage(1, newObject);
*/
GererMesLignesUnitPage pageResultat = new
GererMesLignesUnitPage(1, newModelFromNewObject);
setResponsePage(pageResultat);
}
}
But that doesn't resolve my problem. How can I keep the input in the form
of the first tab in this case :
- User fill the form on the first tab
- User submit the form on the first tab
- application do the search using the form input and show the result on
the second tab with
- User want to the same search with more criteria so he switch back on the
first tab
- User have to fill back all his criteria ... === How can I keep them ?
- Should I pass the model of the form and the model of the result in the
onSubmit() method ?
- If not, do I use correctly the PanelCachingTab in my previous example ?
De :
Igor Vaynberg igor.vaynb...@gmail.com
A:
users@wicket.apache.org
Date:
27/02/2009 18:08
Objet :
Re: [AjaxTabbedPanel] Switching between form and result tab
p.add(new Label(statut, demande.getStatut()));
^ you should use models instead of passing it actual values, that way
your data doesnt get out of sync.
see the models page on the wiki
-igor
2009/2/27 valery.ch...@steria.com:
I've already try that. It didn't work.
But maybe I'm doing something wrong ...
Here's the page code :
private DemandeUnitaire demande;
private GererMesLignesUnitForm myForm;
private AjaxTabbedPanel tabPanel;
private Panel currentPanel;
public GererMesLignesUnitPage(int selectedTab, Object infosToShow) {
if (selectedTab == 1)
demande = (DemandeUnitaire) infosToShow;
myForm = new GererMesLignesUnitForm(recherche, new
CompoundPropertyModel
(new DemandeUnitaire()));
List tabs = new ArrayList();
tabs.add(new PanelCachingTab(
new AbstractTab(new Model(first tab)) {
private static final long serialVersionUID = 1L;
public Panel getPanel(String panelId) {
Panel p = new TabPanel1(panelId);
FeedbackPanel feedback = new FeedbackPanel(msgs
);
p.add(feedback);
p.add(myForm);
return p;
}
}
) {
�...@override
public Panel getPanel(final String panelId) {
return super.getPanel(panelId);
}
});
tabs.add(new PanelCachingTab(
new AbstractTab(new Model(second tab)) {
private static final long serialVersionUID = 1L;
public Panel getPanel(String panelId) {
Panel p = new TabPanel2(panelId);
p.add(new Label(statut, demande.getStatut()));
p.add(new Label(numMachine, demande
.getNumMachine()));
HeaderContributor alert = new HeaderContributor(
new IHeaderContributor() {
public void
renderHead(IHeaderResponse response) {
response.renderOnLoadJavascript(onloadEvent(););
}
}
);
p.add(HeaderContributor.forJavaScript( LIB_JS ));
p.add(HeaderContributor.forJavaScript(
SHOW_HIDE_COLUMN_JS ));
p.add(alert);
return p;
}
}
) {
�...@override
public Panel getPanel(final String panelId) {
return super.getPanel(panelId);
}
});
De :
Igor Vaynberg igor.vaynb...@gmail.com
A:
users@wicket.apache.org
Date:
27/02/2009 17:27
Objet :
Re: [AjaxTabbedPanel] Switching between form and result tab
use panelcachingtab instead of abstracttab
-igor
2009/2/27 valery.ch...@steria.com:
Hi,
Anyone have an idea on the matter below ?
Cheers,
Val
De :
valery.ch...@steria.com
A:
users@wicket.apache.org
Date:
26/02/2009 14:11
Objet :
[AjaxTabbedPanel] Switching between form and result tab
Hi,
I have an AjacTabbedPanel with two tabs.
The first tab is a form which, when submitted, show the result on the
second tabs.
So far, everything's fine.
I want to keep the input from the form after the submit so that the
user
can
Thank you!
I just want to take a moment to thank you all. With your support, my colleagues and I were able to complete our first enterprise-wide Wicket-based application. I work for the Spherion Corporation, which provides staffing services. Our Wicket application is a web site where a newly hired employee completes all the forms required for starting a job (upwards of 15 per user). This replaces a paper-based manual system. We expect a large cost savings as recruiters can focus on placing candidates rather than pushing paper. The application went through a very successful pilot phase, and is now in general use for the whole company. Once again, many thanks -- we couldn't have done it without your help! Steve -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Thank-you%21-tp22290605p22290605.html Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: Switching between markup files for borders
Done.
I'm not sure although that I'm not doing something wrong.
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-2136
On Mon, Mar 2, 2009 at 9:54 PM, Jeremy Thomerson
jer...@wickettraining.com wrote:
I would think you would be better off attaching this to a JIRA.
On Mon, Mar 2, 2009 at 3:00 AM, Anton Veretennikov
anton.veretenni...@gmail.com wrote:
Quickstart is attached.
Tested with last 1.4-SNAPSHOT.
On Sun, Mar 1, 2009 at 12:29 AM, Anton Veretennikov
anton.veretenni...@gmail.com wrote:
Hmm. Strange things I see with image paths in my borders with variants.
My page is mounted like:
mountBookmarkablePage(/getFrame, OrderPaymentPage.class);
So, when I reach my theme with:
.../getFrame?theme=white
- everything is alright.
But asking it with:
.../getFrame/theme/white
- and my border images are touching server with
.../getFrame/theme/images/bar/white/t.gif address.
So, as there is no images there, 404 Not Found is returned for them.
They must be .../images/bar/white/t.gif
Quickstart?
On Thu, Feb 26, 2009 at 2:52 PM, Anton Veretennikov
anton.veretenni...@gmail.com wrote:
Igor, I did it already :)
Jeremy suggests another approach - with no variations.
On Thu, Feb 26, 2009 at 2:48 PM, Igor Vaynberg igor.vaynb...@gmail.com
wrote:
return new roundedcornerborder(...) { string getvariation() { return
black; }};
-igor
On Wed, Feb 25, 2009 at 11:45 PM, Jeremy Thomerson
jer...@wickettraining.com wrote:
Bummer - knew it couldn't be as easy as it looked. :) I don't
suppose it's
something you could do like this, then?
Border.html
td class=foo
main_white.css
TD.foo { background-image: (/url/whiteimages/bar.jpg); }
main_black.css
TD.foo { background-image: (/url/blackimages/bar.jpg); }
As to performance, not sure I understood the question, but selecting
the
themed borders rather than normal borders doesn't slow anything
down. Is
that what you meant?
On Thu, Feb 26, 2009 at 1:15 AM, Anton Veretennikov
anton.veretenni...@gmail.com wrote:
It will be better of course, Jeremy.
My borders have differences not only in css but in images in table
cells. Images are taken from other folders depending on theme name.
Yes, I know, rounded corners can be made with pure css. But my war
with browsers is endless.
I thought about some variable that could be replaces with exact name
of theme in html part. But onComponentTagBody is final in Border
class. And I'm far from Wicket guru.
Another question is performance. When borders are many on a page
their
customazation is time consuming. Am I right?
On Thu, Feb 26, 2009 at 1:54 PM, Jeremy Thomerson
jer...@wickettraining.com wrote:
Obviously I have nothing other than the name of your file to base
this
thought on, but I'll throw it out there anyway
If the only difference between the two is color, just use localized
/
themed
css files and use a single HTML file. This will save you a ton of
code
duplication over having MyBorder_white, MyPanel_white, etc.
Maybe you already are, but I couldn't bare to see what appears to
be pain
and suffering without at least trying to help. :)
On Wed, Feb 25, 2009 at 10:13 AM, Anton Veretennikov
anton.veretenni...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi!
I have a problem with theme support for borders.
I want to exchange real markup of border depending on theme name,
for
example:
RoundedCornerBorder_black.html
RoundedCornerBorder_white.html
How to do this in Wicket?
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
--
Jeremy Thomerson
http://www.wickettraining.com
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
--
Jeremy Thomerson
http://www.wickettraining.com
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
--
Jeremy Thomerson
http://www.wickettraining.com
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: [AjaxTabbedPanel] Switching between form and result tab
True.
Actually, I call the same page (but a new instance) but focus on the
second tab.
I didn't find another way to switch tab on the onSubmit function.
I'm not really familliar with wicket so since you are asking the question,
I guess there's a better way to do what I want ...
De :
Igor Vaynberg igor.vaynb...@gmail.com
A:
users@wicket.apache.org
Date:
02/03/2009 16:45
Objet :
Re: [AjaxTabbedPanel] Switching between form and result tab
in your onsubmit you are calling setresponsepage, so you are going to
a different page, not tab?
-igor
On Mon, Mar 2, 2009 at 12:41 AM, valery.ch...@steria.com wrote:
Thanks for the advice Igor.
I passed the actual values to the second tab (via the submit method of
the
form) just to see if it's working.
So I guess that in the onSubmit method of the form, it's better to pass
a
model than an object
public class GererMesLignesUnitForm extends Form {
...
protected void onSubmit() {
Object newObject = createNewObjectFromRequest();
/* Previous call
* GererMesLignesUnitPage pageResultat = new
GererMesLignesUnitPage(1, newObject);
*/
GererMesLignesUnitPage pageResultat = new
GererMesLignesUnitPage(1, newModelFromNewObject);
setResponsePage(pageResultat);
}
}
But that doesn't resolve my problem. How can I keep the input in the
form
of the first tab in this case :
- User fill the form on the first tab
- User submit the form on the first tab
- application do the search using the form input and show the result on
the second tab with
- User want to the same search with more criteria so he switch back on
the
first tab
- User have to fill back all his criteria ... === How can I keep them
?
- Should I pass the model of the form and the model of the result in the
onSubmit() method ?
- If not, do I use correctly the PanelCachingTab in my previous example
?
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Ce message est à l'attention exclusive des destinataires désignés. Il peut
contenir des informations confidentielles. Si vous n'êtes pas destinataire
du message, merci d'en avertir immédiatement l'expéditeur et de détruire
ce message. Le contenu de ce message ne pourrait engager la responsabilité
de Steria que s'il a été émis par une personne dûment habilitée agissant
dans le strict cadre de ses fonctions et à des fins non étrangères à ses
attributions. Bien que les meilleurs efforts soient faits pour maintenir
cette transmission exempte de tout virus, l'expéditeur ne donne aucune
garantie à cet égard et sa responsabilité ne saurait être engagée pour
tout dommage résultant d'un virus transmis.
This message is intended exclusively for the designated addressee. It may
contain confidential material. If you are not the correct addressee,
please notify the sender immediately and destroy the message. The content
of this message will engage the responsibility of Steria only if it has
been sent by an authorized person acting in the strict scope of his
functions and for purposes that are related to his competence. Although
reasonable efforts have been made to keep this transmission free from
viruses, the sender will not be liable for damages caused by a transmitted
virus.
Re: [AjaxTabbedPanel] Switching between form and result tab
tabbedpanle.setselectedtab(int)
-igor
On Mon, Mar 2, 2009 at 7:58 AM, valery.ch...@steria.com wrote:
True.
Actually, I call the same page (but a new instance) but focus on the
second tab.
I didn't find another way to switch tab on the onSubmit function.
I'm not really familliar with wicket so since you are asking the question,
I guess there's a better way to do what I want ...
De :
Igor Vaynberg igor.vaynb...@gmail.com
A:
users@wicket.apache.org
Date:
02/03/2009 16:45
Objet :
Re: [AjaxTabbedPanel] Switching between form and result tab
in your onsubmit you are calling setresponsepage, so you are going to
a different page, not tab?
-igor
On Mon, Mar 2, 2009 at 12:41 AM, valery.ch...@steria.com wrote:
Thanks for the advice Igor.
I passed the actual values to the second tab (via the submit method of
the
form) just to see if it's working.
So I guess that in the onSubmit method of the form, it's better to pass
a
model than an object
public class GererMesLignesUnitForm extends Form {
...
protected void onSubmit() {
Object newObject = createNewObjectFromRequest();
/* Previous call
* GererMesLignesUnitPage pageResultat = new
GererMesLignesUnitPage(1, newObject);
*/
GererMesLignesUnitPage pageResultat = new
GererMesLignesUnitPage(1, newModelFromNewObject);
setResponsePage(pageResultat);
}
}
But that doesn't resolve my problem. How can I keep the input in the
form
of the first tab in this case :
- User fill the form on the first tab
- User submit the form on the first tab
- application do the search using the form input and show the result on
the second tab with
- User want to the same search with more criteria so he switch back on
the
first tab
- User have to fill back all his criteria ... === How can I keep them
?
- Should I pass the model of the form and the model of the result in the
onSubmit() method ?
- If not, do I use correctly the PanelCachingTab in my previous example
?
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Ce message est à l'attention exclusive des destinataires désignés. Il peut
contenir des informations confidentielles. Si vous n'êtes pas destinataire
du message, merci d'en avertir immédiatement l'expéditeur et de détruire
ce message. Le contenu de ce message ne pourrait engager la responsabilité
de Steria que s'il a été émis par une personne dûment habilitée agissant
dans le strict cadre de ses fonctions et à des fins non étrangères à ses
attributions. Bien que les meilleurs efforts soient faits pour maintenir
cette transmission exempte de tout virus, l'expéditeur ne donne aucune
garantie à cet égard et sa responsabilité ne saurait être engagée pour
tout dommage résultant d'un virus transmis.
This message is intended exclusively for the designated addressee. It may
contain confidential material. If you are not the correct addressee,
please notify the sender immediately and destroy the message. The content
of this message will engage the responsibility of Steria only if it has
been sent by an authorized person acting in the strict scope of his
functions and for purposes that are related to his competence. Although
reasonable efforts have been made to keep this transmission free from
viruses, the sender will not be liable for damages caused by a transmitted
virus.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
RE: Wicket Link with proxy server: wrong hostname
Hi all,
My problem with wrong hostnames is solved now.
We found two options to solve this.
Option 1)
Apache proxy httpd.conf change, use app-server name instead of ip address:
ProxyPass /pls http://xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx:/pls
ProxyPassReverse/pls http://xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx:/pls
=
ProxyPass /pls http://app-servername:/pls
ProxyPassReverse/pls http://app-servername:/pls
Option 2)
In Oracle HTTP Server (iAS) httpd.conf, set
UseCanonicalName Off
Thank for your help!
Best Regards
Harri
-Original Message-
From: ext Marcelo Morales [mailto:marcelomorales.n...@gmail.com]
Sent: 27 February, 2009 22:17
To: users@wicket.apache.org
Subject: Re: Wicket Link with proxy server: wrong hostname
Hi
I am not a fan of reverse proxying. I would not vote for it if runs.
If your servlet container supports it, you may try the AJP protocol.
It works on tomcat at least. AJP is better than just using a
http reverse proxy because: a) you get the right client IP
address then asking the servlet API, b) isSecure() and
getScheme() will work as expected, and c) the container
becomes aware of the changed context root.
On Fri, Feb 27, 2009 at 6:14 AM, harri.temo...@nokia.com wrote:
Hi all,
I have problem when Wicket 1.3.5 application is installed
behind proxy server.
Application it showing Index page in url
https://www.mycompany.com/pls/myapp/
When clicking link (pointing into same Index page), browser is going
to url http://server:/pls/myapp/
Any ideas about to solve this? Details listed below.
Best Regards
Harri
==Index.html=
html xmlns:wicket=http://wicket.apache.org/;
body
a wicket:id = linkIndexIndex/a /body /html
==Index.java=
public class Index extends WebPage {
public Index() {
Link linkToAnchor = new Link(linkIndex) {
public void onClick() {
setResponsePage(Index.class);
}
};
add(linkToAnchor);
}
}
==MyApplication.java=
public class MyApplication extends WebApplication {
@Override
public Class getHomePage() {
return Index.class;
}
}
==web.xml
?xml version = '1.0' encoding = 'windows-1252'? web-app
xmlns:xsi=http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance;
xsi:schemaLocation=http://java.sun.com/xml/ns/j2ee
http://java.sun.com/xml/ns/j2ee/web-app_2_4.xsd; version=2.4
xmlns=http://java.sun.com/xml/ns/j2ee;
descriptionEmpty web.xml file for Web Application/description
filter
filter-nameWicketApplication/filter-name
filter-classorg.apache.wicket.protocol.http.WicketFilter/fil
ter-class
init-param
param-nameapplicationClassName/param-name
param-valuecom.mycompany.app.MyApplication/param-value
/init-param
/filter
filter-mapping
filter-nameWicketApplication/filter-name
url-pattern/*/url-pattern
/filter-mapping
session-config
session-timeout35/session-timeout
/session-config
mime-mapping
extensionhtml/extension
mime-typetext/html/mime-type
/mime-mapping
mime-mapping
extensiontxt/extension
mime-typetext/plain/mime-type
/mime-mapping
/web-app
===
My infra stack is:
Alteon SSL Aaccelerator url:
https://www.mycompany.com/pls/myapp/
Apache Proxy url:
http://webserver:80/pls/myapp/
Httpd.conf:
ProxyPass /pls http://server:/pls/myapp/
ProxyPassReverse/pls http://server:/pls/myapp/
Oracle Application Server url:
http://server:/pls/myapp/
--
Marcelo Morales
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: [AjaxTabbedPanel] Switching between form and result tab
Ok. I already use this one to switch on the second tab when I call the
same page with the second page id.
But I don't have any instance of the tabPanel in the Form.
Should I put the tabPanel as a parameter when I create the form in the
Page.java ?
Valéry Chhoa
De :
Igor Vaynberg igor.vaynb...@gmail.com
A:
users@wicket.apache.org
Date:
02/03/2009 17:01
Objet :
Re: [AjaxTabbedPanel] Switching between form and result tab
tabbedpanle.setselectedtab(int)
-igor
On Mon, Mar 2, 2009 at 7:58 AM, valery.ch...@steria.com wrote:
True.
Actually, I call the same page (but a new instance) but focus on the
second tab.
I didn't find another way to switch tab on the onSubmit function.
I'm not really familliar with wicket so since you are asking the
question,
I guess there's a better way to do what I want ...
De :
Igor Vaynberg igor.vaynb...@gmail.com
A:
users@wicket.apache.org
Date:
02/03/2009 16:45
Objet :
Re: [AjaxTabbedPanel] Switching between form and result tab
in your onsubmit you are calling setresponsepage, so you are going to
a different page, not tab?
-igor
On Mon, Mar 2, 2009 at 12:41 AM, valery.ch...@steria.com wrote:
Thanks for the advice Igor.
I passed the actual values to the second tab (via the submit method of
the
form) just to see if it's working.
So I guess that in the onSubmit method of the form, it's better to pass
a
model than an object
public class GererMesLignesUnitForm extends Form {
...
protected void onSubmit() {
Object newObject = createNewObjectFromRequest();
/* Previous call
* GererMesLignesUnitPage pageResultat = new
GererMesLignesUnitPage(1, newObject);
*/
GererMesLignesUnitPage pageResultat = new
GererMesLignesUnitPage(1, newModelFromNewObject);
setResponsePage(pageResultat);
}
}
But that doesn't resolve my problem. How can I keep the input in the
form
of the first tab in this case :
- User fill the form on the first tab
- User submit the form on the first tab
- application do the search using the form input and show the result on
the second tab with
- User want to the same search with more criteria so he switch back on
the
first tab
- User have to fill back all his criteria ... === How can I keep
them
?
- Should I pass the model of the form and the model of the result in
the
onSubmit() method ?
- If not, do I use correctly the PanelCachingTab in my previous example
?
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Ce message est à l'attention exclusive des destinataires désignés. Il
peut
contenir des informations confidentielles. Si vous n'êtes pas
destinataire
du message, merci d'en avertir immédiatement l'expéditeur et de détruire
ce message. Le contenu de ce message ne pourrait engager la
responsabilité
de Steria que s'il a été émis par une personne dûment habilitée agissant
dans le strict cadre de ses fonctions et à des fins non étrangères à ses
attributions. Bien que les meilleurs efforts soient faits pour maintenir
cette transmission exempte de tout virus, l'expéditeur ne donne aucune
garantie à cet égard et sa responsabilité ne saurait être engagée pour
tout dommage résultant d'un virus transmis.
This message is intended exclusively for the designated addressee. It
may
contain confidential material. If you are not the correct addressee,
please notify the sender immediately and destroy the message. The
content
of this message will engage the responsibility of Steria only if it has
been sent by an authorized person acting in the strict scope of his
functions and for purposes that are related to his competence. Although
reasonable efforts have been made to keep this transmission free from
viruses, the sender will not be liable for damages caused by a
transmitted
virus.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Ce message est à l'attention exclusive des destinataires désignés. Il peut
contenir des informations confidentielles. Si vous n'êtes pas destinataire
du message, merci d'en avertir immédiatement l'expéditeur et de détruire
ce message. Le contenu de ce message ne pourrait engager la responsabilité
de Steria que s'il a été émis par une personne dûment habilitée agissant
dans le strict cadre de ses fonctions et à des fins non étrangères à ses
attributions. Bien que les meilleurs efforts soient faits pour maintenir
cette transmission exempte de tout virus, l'expéditeur ne donne aucune
garantie à cet égard et sa responsabilité ne saurait être engagée pour
tout dommage résultant d'un virus transmis.
This message is intended
Another borders scenario
Hello! I'm again with borders. May be I'm not using them right... Is everything okey with this mix of border and child: Block.html: wicket:panel div wicket:id=border wicket:child / /div /wicket:panel Block.java (extends Panel) add(new RoundedCornersPanelGrey(border)); ChildBlock.html: wicket:extend a wicket:id=linklink/a /wicket:extend ChildBlock.java (extends Block) add(new Link(link) It doesn't work with border in Block (can't find component). It works only without border or with border in ChildBlock around a. -- Tony. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Browser opens a dialog box for text/html Resource
Hi, I am integrating some reports using the JasperReports integration classes found in the Wicket stuff. Basically I have a class that extends DynamicWebResource It is linked using a ResourceLink that triggers its output. Content type is returned as text/html. Why is the browser asking me before opening it? I want it to automatically open in a new window just as it dows when I approve the dialog box. On another level, as I specified the output is triggered using a ResourceLink on the page. How do I trigger the output when I want to put a form and a submit link on the page. This means I want to create the Resource on submit and trigger its output based on the form selections not as a direct link on the pgae. Thanks, Arie On Mon, Mar 2, 2009 at 5:48 PM, shetc sh...@bellsouth.net wrote: I just want to take a moment to thank you all. With your support, my colleagues and I were able to complete our first enterprise-wide Wicket-based application. I work for the Spherion Corporation, which provides staffing services. Our Wicket application is a web site where a newly hired employee completes all the forms required for starting a job (upwards of 15 per user). This replaces a paper-based manual system. We expect a large cost savings as recruiters can focus on placing candidates rather than pushing paper. The application went through a very successful pilot phase, and is now in general use for the whole company. Once again, many thanks -- we couldn't have done it without your help! Steve -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Thank-you%21-tp22290605p22290605.html Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Browser opens a dialog box for text/html Resource
Hi, I am integrating some reports using the JasperReports integration classes found in the Wicket stuff. Basically I have a class that extends DynamicWebResource It is linked using a ResourceLink that triggers its output. Content type is returned as text/html. Why is the browser asking me before opening it? I want it to automatically open in a new window just as it dows when I approve the dialog box. On another level, as I specified the output is triggered using a ResourceLink on the page. How do I trigger the output when I want to put a form and a submit link on the page. This means I want to create the Resource on submit and trigger its output based on the form selections not as a direct link on the pgae. Thanks, Arie
Re: LocaleDropDown does not switch locale anymore when deployed on server
Solved - at least I found a work around. It was a server issue. We were missing de_DE locale files on the system. But I still had to explicitly set the system variable LC_ALL to de_DE.ISO-8859-1, before restarting tomcat. Shouldn't the JVM come with full I18N support already? Well, it works, but if anyone has an explanation for this behaviour, I'd be happy. Cheers, Roman Roman Zechner wrote: Hi, we are using the LocaleDropDown component mentioned in Wicket in Action. While it works on the local machine, it does not when deployed on our server. We need to switch between German and English. German works on my local machine, on the server it doesn't. Any ideas? Roman - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
VOTE: Remove ? extends from constructor of DropDownChoice
Ok, as suggested, here is the thread, and the first vote.
+1
for making the generic definition the same for all list type components.
FYI - you can also vote in the issue I just created at (which might
actually be a better place to vote):
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-2137
- Brill
On 28-Feb-09, at 5:18 PM, Jeremy Thomerson wrote:
Perhaps start a vote thread, with the subject something like: VOTE:
Remove
? extends from constructor of DropDownChoice.
I'd be +1 non-binding
--
Jeremy Thomerson
http://www.wickettraining.com
On Sat, Feb 28, 2009 at 3:33 PM, Brill Pappin br...@pappin.ca wrote:
I'm of the don't widen it camp anyway :)
So how do I go about gathering support for having the
DropDownChoice work
with the models the way everything else does?
- Brill
On 28-Feb-09, at 1:42 AM, Igor Vaynberg wrote:
yes, the choice was intentional. personally i do not care if it is
T
all the way, some users complained so we widened it on the choices
model, we cannot widen it on the main model.
-igor
On Fri, Feb 27, 2009 at 8:51 PM, Brill Pappin br...@pappin.ca
wrote:
I see... but this would i think because Bar is a Foo:
class Bar exends Foo {}
List? extends Foo list = ...
list.add(new Bar());
Anyway, what your saying is that the generics choice was
intentional?
- Brill
On 27-Feb-09, at 3:19 PM, Igor Vaynberg wrote:
list? extends string stings=...
strings.add(asd); == wont compile
-igor
On Fri, Feb 27, 2009 at 11:13 AM, Adriano dos Santos Fernandes
adrian...@gmail.com wrote:
What do you mean with read only here?
Adriano
Igor Vaynberg escreveu:
? extends Foo collections are read only, it would be too
inconvenient to make the model collection read only :)
-igor
On Thu, Feb 26, 2009 at 8:34 PM, Jeremy Thomerson
jer...@wickettraining.com wrote:
This is what I was commenting on last week on the list (or
earlier
this
week). One expects List? extends Foo while the other expects
ListFoo.
I'm not fully convinced yet that the ? extends is the better
option.
Either way, I think they should be the same.
--
Jeremy Thomerson
http://www.wickettraining.com
On Thu, Feb 26, 2009 at 8:27 PM, Brill Pappin br...@pappin.ca
wrote:
Roughly what I'm doing is:
class TypeA{}
class TypeAModel extends LoadableDetachableModel
ListTypeA {
public ListTypeA load(){
... do the load ...
return ...
}
}
TypeAModel model = new TypeAModel();
DropDownChoice TypeA ddc = new DropDownChoiceTypeA(id,
model
);
which gets complained about... in this case the generic def is
DropDownChoiceList? extends T
I think the problem is that the generic def of the class
should
actually
be
DropDownChoiceListT because you are already identifying
the type
when
you create a new instance.
Now... my generics are a bit hazy at this level, because I can
understand
why it was done that way... does anyone with more generics
experience
know
what it should be? Is this a bug that needs filing?
- Brill
On 26-Feb-09, at 6:03 PM, Kaspar Fischer wrote:
On 26.02.2009, at 22:52, Brill Pappin wrote:
For some reason the DropDownChoice component doesn't have
the same
generics as ListView and it will not accept a model that
listview
will,
despite its saying that it will accept an IModel.
Is anyone else having that sort of trouble with
DropDownChoice?
- Brill
Can you give us more information on what exactly is not
working for
you?
DropDownChoice indeed does accept a model, see for instance
the
example
in
the class description at
http://wicket.apache.org/docs/1.4/org/apache/wicket/markup/html/form/DropDownChoice.html
This works for me.
Kaspar
--
!-- HTML: --
select wicket:id=site
optionsite 1/option
optionsite 2/option
/select
ul
li wicket:id=site2wicket:container
wicket:id=sitename//li
/ul
// Code
List SITES = Arrays.asList(new String[] {
The Server Side, Java Lobby, Java.Net
});
form.add(new DropDownChoice(site, SITES));
form.add(new ListView(site2, SITES)
{
@Override
protected void populateItem(ListItem item)
{
item.add(new Label(sitename, item.getModel()));
}
});
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
? extends
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: VOTE: Remove ? extends from constructor of DropDownChoice
have you seen this thread? looks like someone beat you to it.
[vote] In Wicket 1.4 and onwards, remove widening from the list of
choices model in DropDownChoice, changing it from IModelList?
extends Foo to IModelListFoo
-igor
On Mon, Mar 2, 2009 at 12:11 PM, Brill Pappin br...@pappin.ca wrote:
Ok, as suggested, here is the thread, and the first vote.
+1
for making the generic definition the same for all list type components.
FYI - you can also vote in the issue I just created at (which might
actually be a better place to vote):
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-2137
- Brill
On 28-Feb-09, at 5:18 PM, Jeremy Thomerson wrote:
Perhaps start a vote thread, with the subject something like: VOTE:
Remove
? extends from constructor of DropDownChoice.
I'd be +1 non-binding
--
Jeremy Thomerson
http://www.wickettraining.com
On Sat, Feb 28, 2009 at 3:33 PM, Brill Pappin br...@pappin.ca wrote:
I'm of the don't widen it camp anyway :)
So how do I go about gathering support for having the DropDownChoice work
with the models the way everything else does?
- Brill
On 28-Feb-09, at 1:42 AM, Igor Vaynberg wrote:
yes, the choice was intentional. personally i do not care if it is T
all the way, some users complained so we widened it on the choices
model, we cannot widen it on the main model.
-igor
On Fri, Feb 27, 2009 at 8:51 PM, Brill Pappin br...@pappin.ca wrote:
I see... but this would i think because Bar is a Foo:
class Bar exends Foo {}
List? extends Foo list = ...
list.add(new Bar());
Anyway, what your saying is that the generics choice was intentional?
- Brill
On 27-Feb-09, at 3:19 PM, Igor Vaynberg wrote:
list? extends string stings=...
strings.add(asd); == wont compile
-igor
On Fri, Feb 27, 2009 at 11:13 AM, Adriano dos Santos Fernandes
adrian...@gmail.com wrote:
What do you mean with read only here?
Adriano
Igor Vaynberg escreveu:
? extends Foo collections are read only, it would be too
inconvenient to make the model collection read only :)
-igor
On Thu, Feb 26, 2009 at 8:34 PM, Jeremy Thomerson
jer...@wickettraining.com wrote:
This is what I was commenting on last week on the list (or earlier
this
week). One expects List? extends Foo while the other expects
ListFoo.
I'm not fully convinced yet that the ? extends is the better
option.
Either way, I think they should be the same.
--
Jeremy Thomerson
http://www.wickettraining.com
On Thu, Feb 26, 2009 at 8:27 PM, Brill Pappin br...@pappin.ca
wrote:
Roughly what I'm doing is:
class TypeA{}
class TypeAModel extends LoadableDetachableModel ListTypeA {
public ListTypeA load(){
... do the load ...
return ...
}
}
TypeAModel model = new TypeAModel();
DropDownChoice TypeA ddc = new DropDownChoiceTypeA(id, model
);
which gets complained about... in this case the generic def is
DropDownChoiceList? extends T
I think the problem is that the generic def of the class should
actually
be
DropDownChoiceListT because you are already identifying the
type
when
you create a new instance.
Now... my generics are a bit hazy at this level, because I can
understand
why it was done that way... does anyone with more generics
experience
know
what it should be? Is this a bug that needs filing?
- Brill
On 26-Feb-09, at 6:03 PM, Kaspar Fischer wrote:
On 26.02.2009, at 22:52, Brill Pappin wrote:
For some reason the DropDownChoice component doesn't have the
same
generics as ListView and it will not accept a model that
listview
will,
despite its saying that it will accept an IModel.
Is anyone else having that sort of trouble with DropDownChoice?
- Brill
Can you give us more information on what exactly is not working
for
you?
DropDownChoice indeed does accept a model, see for instance the
example
in
the class description at
http://wicket.apache.org/docs/1.4/org/apache/wicket/markup/html/form/DropDownChoice.html
This works for me.
Kaspar
--
!-- HTML: --
select wicket:id=site
optionsite 1/option
optionsite 2/option
/select
ul
li wicket:id=site2wicket:container
wicket:id=sitename//li
/ul
// Code
List SITES = Arrays.asList(new String[] {
The Server Side, Java Lobby, Java.Net
});
form.add(new DropDownChoice(site, SITES));
form.add(new ListView(site2, SITES)
{
@Override
protected void populateItem(ListItem item)
{
item.add(new Label(sitename, item.getModel()));
}
});
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
? extends
-
Re: VOTE: Remove ? extends from constructor of DropDownChoice
I vote -0.99 on this (non-binding of course). I'd vote +1 to making
ListView accept List? extends T rather than making DDC less
flexible.
On Mon, Mar 2, 2009 at 3:11 PM, Brill Pappin br...@pappin.ca wrote:
Ok, as suggested, here is the thread, and the first vote.
+1
for making the generic definition the same for all list type components.
FYI - you can also vote in the issue I just created at (which might
actually be a better place to vote):
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-2137
- Brill
On 28-Feb-09, at 5:18 PM, Jeremy Thomerson wrote:
Perhaps start a vote thread, with the subject something like: VOTE:
Remove
? extends from constructor of DropDownChoice.
I'd be +1 non-binding
--
Jeremy Thomerson
http://www.wickettraining.com
On Sat, Feb 28, 2009 at 3:33 PM, Brill Pappin br...@pappin.ca wrote:
I'm of the don't widen it camp anyway :)
So how do I go about gathering support for having the DropDownChoice work
with the models the way everything else does?
- Brill
On 28-Feb-09, at 1:42 AM, Igor Vaynberg wrote:
yes, the choice was intentional. personally i do not care if it is T
all the way, some users complained so we widened it on the choices
model, we cannot widen it on the main model.
-igor
On Fri, Feb 27, 2009 at 8:51 PM, Brill Pappin br...@pappin.ca wrote:
I see... but this would i think because Bar is a Foo:
class Bar exends Foo {}
List? extends Foo list = ...
list.add(new Bar());
Anyway, what your saying is that the generics choice was intentional?
- Brill
On 27-Feb-09, at 3:19 PM, Igor Vaynberg wrote:
list? extends string stings=...
strings.add(asd); == wont compile
-igor
On Fri, Feb 27, 2009 at 11:13 AM, Adriano dos Santos Fernandes
adrian...@gmail.com wrote:
What do you mean with read only here?
Adriano
Igor Vaynberg escreveu:
? extends Foo collections are read only, it would be too
inconvenient to make the model collection read only :)
-igor
On Thu, Feb 26, 2009 at 8:34 PM, Jeremy Thomerson
jer...@wickettraining.com wrote:
This is what I was commenting on last week on the list (or earlier
this
week). One expects List? extends Foo while the other expects
ListFoo.
I'm not fully convinced yet that the ? extends is the better
option.
Either way, I think they should be the same.
--
Jeremy Thomerson
http://www.wickettraining.com
On Thu, Feb 26, 2009 at 8:27 PM, Brill Pappin br...@pappin.ca
wrote:
Roughly what I'm doing is:
class TypeA{}
class TypeAModel extends LoadableDetachableModel ListTypeA {
public ListTypeA load(){
... do the load ...
return ...
}
}
TypeAModel model = new TypeAModel();
DropDownChoice TypeA ddc = new DropDownChoiceTypeA(id, model
);
which gets complained about... in this case the generic def is
DropDownChoiceList? extends T
I think the problem is that the generic def of the class should
actually
be
DropDownChoiceListT because you are already identifying the
type
when
you create a new instance.
Now... my generics are a bit hazy at this level, because I can
understand
why it was done that way... does anyone with more generics
experience
know
what it should be? Is this a bug that needs filing?
- Brill
On 26-Feb-09, at 6:03 PM, Kaspar Fischer wrote:
On 26.02.2009, at 22:52, Brill Pappin wrote:
For some reason the DropDownChoice component doesn't have the
same
generics as ListView and it will not accept a model that
listview
will,
despite its saying that it will accept an IModel.
Is anyone else having that sort of trouble with DropDownChoice?
- Brill
Can you give us more information on what exactly is not working
for
you?
DropDownChoice indeed does accept a model, see for instance the
example
in
the class description at
http://wicket.apache.org/docs/1.4/org/apache/wicket/markup/html/form/DropDownChoice.html
This works for me.
Kaspar
--
!-- HTML: --
select wicket:id=site
optionsite 1/option
optionsite 2/option
/select
ul
li wicket:id=site2wicket:container
wicket:id=sitename//li
/ul
// Code
List SITES = Arrays.asList(new String[] {
The Server Side, Java Lobby, Java.Net
});
form.add(new DropDownChoice(site, SITES));
form.add(new ListView(site2, SITES)
{
@Override
protected void populateItem(ListItem item)
{
item.add(new Label(sitename, item.getModel()));
}
});
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
? extends
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands,
Re: VOTE: Remove ? extends from constructor of DropDownChoice
see WICKET-2126
-igor
On Mon, Mar 2, 2009 at 12:19 PM, James Carman
jcar...@carmanconsulting.com wrote:
I vote -0.99 on this (non-binding of course). I'd vote +1 to making
ListView accept List? extends T rather than making DDC less
flexible.
On Mon, Mar 2, 2009 at 3:11 PM, Brill Pappin br...@pappin.ca wrote:
Ok, as suggested, here is the thread, and the first vote.
+1
for making the generic definition the same for all list type components.
FYI - you can also vote in the issue I just created at (which might
actually be a better place to vote):
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-2137
- Brill
On 28-Feb-09, at 5:18 PM, Jeremy Thomerson wrote:
Perhaps start a vote thread, with the subject something like: VOTE:
Remove
? extends from constructor of DropDownChoice.
I'd be +1 non-binding
--
Jeremy Thomerson
http://www.wickettraining.com
On Sat, Feb 28, 2009 at 3:33 PM, Brill Pappin br...@pappin.ca wrote:
I'm of the don't widen it camp anyway :)
So how do I go about gathering support for having the DropDownChoice work
with the models the way everything else does?
- Brill
On 28-Feb-09, at 1:42 AM, Igor Vaynberg wrote:
yes, the choice was intentional. personally i do not care if it is T
all the way, some users complained so we widened it on the choices
model, we cannot widen it on the main model.
-igor
On Fri, Feb 27, 2009 at 8:51 PM, Brill Pappin br...@pappin.ca wrote:
I see... but this would i think because Bar is a Foo:
class Bar exends Foo {}
List? extends Foo list = ...
list.add(new Bar());
Anyway, what your saying is that the generics choice was intentional?
- Brill
On 27-Feb-09, at 3:19 PM, Igor Vaynberg wrote:
list? extends string stings=...
strings.add(asd); == wont compile
-igor
On Fri, Feb 27, 2009 at 11:13 AM, Adriano dos Santos Fernandes
adrian...@gmail.com wrote:
What do you mean with read only here?
Adriano
Igor Vaynberg escreveu:
? extends Foo collections are read only, it would be too
inconvenient to make the model collection read only :)
-igor
On Thu, Feb 26, 2009 at 8:34 PM, Jeremy Thomerson
jer...@wickettraining.com wrote:
This is what I was commenting on last week on the list (or earlier
this
week). One expects List? extends Foo while the other expects
ListFoo.
I'm not fully convinced yet that the ? extends is the better
option.
Either way, I think they should be the same.
--
Jeremy Thomerson
http://www.wickettraining.com
On Thu, Feb 26, 2009 at 8:27 PM, Brill Pappin br...@pappin.ca
wrote:
Roughly what I'm doing is:
class TypeA{}
class TypeAModel extends LoadableDetachableModel ListTypeA {
public ListTypeA load(){
... do the load ...
return ...
}
}
TypeAModel model = new TypeAModel();
DropDownChoice TypeA ddc = new DropDownChoiceTypeA(id, model
);
which gets complained about... in this case the generic def is
DropDownChoiceList? extends T
I think the problem is that the generic def of the class should
actually
be
DropDownChoiceListT because you are already identifying the
type
when
you create a new instance.
Now... my generics are a bit hazy at this level, because I can
understand
why it was done that way... does anyone with more generics
experience
know
what it should be? Is this a bug that needs filing?
- Brill
On 26-Feb-09, at 6:03 PM, Kaspar Fischer wrote:
On 26.02.2009, at 22:52, Brill Pappin wrote:
For some reason the DropDownChoice component doesn't have the
same
generics as ListView and it will not accept a model that
listview
will,
despite its saying that it will accept an IModel.
Is anyone else having that sort of trouble with DropDownChoice?
- Brill
Can you give us more information on what exactly is not working
for
you?
DropDownChoice indeed does accept a model, see for instance the
example
in
the class description at
http://wicket.apache.org/docs/1.4/org/apache/wicket/markup/html/form/DropDownChoice.html
This works for me.
Kaspar
--
!-- HTML: --
select wicket:id=site
optionsite 1/option
optionsite 2/option
/select
ul
li wicket:id=site2wicket:container
wicket:id=sitename//li
/ul
// Code
List SITES = Arrays.asList(new String[] {
The Server Side, Java Lobby, Java.Net
});
form.add(new DropDownChoice(site, SITES));
form.add(new ListView(site2, SITES)
{
@Override
protected void populateItem(ListItem item)
{
item.add(new Label(sitename, item.getModel()));
}
});
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
? extends
Re: VOTE: Remove ? extends from constructor of DropDownChoice
Aren't both the choices model in DDC and the actual model of
ListView supposed to be considered read-only (as far as the component
is concerned)? The DDC and ListView don't need to be able to alter
those models anyway, right? Perhaps my experience is just too
limited, but I don't think I've ever tried to do either one of your
usecases (I always consider them read-only).
On Mon, Mar 2, 2009 at 3:24 PM, Igor Vaynberg igor.vaynb...@gmail.com wrote:
see WICKET-2126
-igor
On Mon, Mar 2, 2009 at 12:19 PM, James Carman
jcar...@carmanconsulting.com wrote:
I vote -0.99 on this (non-binding of course). I'd vote +1 to making
ListView accept List? extends T rather than making DDC less
flexible.
On Mon, Mar 2, 2009 at 3:11 PM, Brill Pappin br...@pappin.ca wrote:
Ok, as suggested, here is the thread, and the first vote.
+1
for making the generic definition the same for all list type components.
FYI - you can also vote in the issue I just created at (which might
actually be a better place to vote):
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-2137
- Brill
On 28-Feb-09, at 5:18 PM, Jeremy Thomerson wrote:
Perhaps start a vote thread, with the subject something like: VOTE:
Remove
? extends from constructor of DropDownChoice.
I'd be +1 non-binding
--
Jeremy Thomerson
http://www.wickettraining.com
On Sat, Feb 28, 2009 at 3:33 PM, Brill Pappin br...@pappin.ca wrote:
I'm of the don't widen it camp anyway :)
So how do I go about gathering support for having the DropDownChoice work
with the models the way everything else does?
- Brill
On 28-Feb-09, at 1:42 AM, Igor Vaynberg wrote:
yes, the choice was intentional. personally i do not care if it is T
all the way, some users complained so we widened it on the choices
model, we cannot widen it on the main model.
-igor
On Fri, Feb 27, 2009 at 8:51 PM, Brill Pappin br...@pappin.ca wrote:
I see... but this would i think because Bar is a Foo:
class Bar exends Foo {}
List? extends Foo list = ...
list.add(new Bar());
Anyway, what your saying is that the generics choice was intentional?
- Brill
On 27-Feb-09, at 3:19 PM, Igor Vaynberg wrote:
list? extends string stings=...
strings.add(asd); == wont compile
-igor
On Fri, Feb 27, 2009 at 11:13 AM, Adriano dos Santos Fernandes
adrian...@gmail.com wrote:
What do you mean with read only here?
Adriano
Igor Vaynberg escreveu:
? extends Foo collections are read only, it would be too
inconvenient to make the model collection read only :)
-igor
On Thu, Feb 26, 2009 at 8:34 PM, Jeremy Thomerson
jer...@wickettraining.com wrote:
This is what I was commenting on last week on the list (or earlier
this
week). One expects List? extends Foo while the other expects
ListFoo.
I'm not fully convinced yet that the ? extends is the better
option.
Either way, I think they should be the same.
--
Jeremy Thomerson
http://www.wickettraining.com
On Thu, Feb 26, 2009 at 8:27 PM, Brill Pappin br...@pappin.ca
wrote:
Roughly what I'm doing is:
class TypeA{}
class TypeAModel extends LoadableDetachableModel ListTypeA {
public ListTypeA load(){
... do the load ...
return ...
}
}
TypeAModel model = new TypeAModel();
DropDownChoice TypeA ddc = new DropDownChoiceTypeA(id, model
);
which gets complained about... in this case the generic def is
DropDownChoiceList? extends T
I think the problem is that the generic def of the class should
actually
be
DropDownChoiceListT because you are already identifying the
type
when
you create a new instance.
Now... my generics are a bit hazy at this level, because I can
understand
why it was done that way... does anyone with more generics
experience
know
what it should be? Is this a bug that needs filing?
- Brill
On 26-Feb-09, at 6:03 PM, Kaspar Fischer wrote:
On 26.02.2009, at 22:52, Brill Pappin wrote:
For some reason the DropDownChoice component doesn't have the
same
generics as ListView and it will not accept a model that
listview
will,
despite its saying that it will accept an IModel.
Is anyone else having that sort of trouble with DropDownChoice?
- Brill
Can you give us more information on what exactly is not working
for
you?
DropDownChoice indeed does accept a model, see for instance the
example
in
the class description at
http://wicket.apache.org/docs/1.4/org/apache/wicket/markup/html/form/DropDownChoice.html
This works for me.
Kaspar
--
!-- HTML: --
select wicket:id=site
optionsite 1/option
optionsite 2/option
/select
ul
li wicket:id=site2wicket:container
wicket:id=sitename//li
/ul
// Code
List SITES = Arrays.asList(new String[] {
The Server Side, Java Lobby, Java.Net
});
form.add(new DropDownChoice(site, SITES));
form.add(new ListView(site2, SITES)
{
@Override
protected void populateItem(ListItem item)
{
item.add(new Label(sitename, item.getModel()));
}
});
Re: VOTE: Remove ? extends from constructor of DropDownChoice
depends on your coding style.
-igor
On Mon, Mar 2, 2009 at 12:44 PM, James Carman
jcar...@carmanconsulting.com wrote:
Aren't both the choices model in DDC and the actual model of
ListView supposed to be considered read-only (as far as the component
is concerned)? The DDC and ListView don't need to be able to alter
those models anyway, right? Perhaps my experience is just too
limited, but I don't think I've ever tried to do either one of your
usecases (I always consider them read-only).
On Mon, Mar 2, 2009 at 3:24 PM, Igor Vaynberg igor.vaynb...@gmail.com wrote:
see WICKET-2126
-igor
On Mon, Mar 2, 2009 at 12:19 PM, James Carman
jcar...@carmanconsulting.com wrote:
I vote -0.99 on this (non-binding of course). I'd vote +1 to making
ListView accept List? extends T rather than making DDC less
flexible.
On Mon, Mar 2, 2009 at 3:11 PM, Brill Pappin br...@pappin.ca wrote:
Ok, as suggested, here is the thread, and the first vote.
+1
for making the generic definition the same for all list type components.
FYI - you can also vote in the issue I just created at (which might
actually be a better place to vote):
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-2137
- Brill
On 28-Feb-09, at 5:18 PM, Jeremy Thomerson wrote:
Perhaps start a vote thread, with the subject something like: VOTE:
Remove
? extends from constructor of DropDownChoice.
I'd be +1 non-binding
--
Jeremy Thomerson
http://www.wickettraining.com
On Sat, Feb 28, 2009 at 3:33 PM, Brill Pappin br...@pappin.ca wrote:
I'm of the don't widen it camp anyway :)
So how do I go about gathering support for having the DropDownChoice work
with the models the way everything else does?
- Brill
On 28-Feb-09, at 1:42 AM, Igor Vaynberg wrote:
yes, the choice was intentional. personally i do not care if it is T
all the way, some users complained so we widened it on the choices
model, we cannot widen it on the main model.
-igor
On Fri, Feb 27, 2009 at 8:51 PM, Brill Pappin br...@pappin.ca wrote:
I see... but this would i think because Bar is a Foo:
class Bar exends Foo {}
List? extends Foo list = ...
list.add(new Bar());
Anyway, what your saying is that the generics choice was intentional?
- Brill
On 27-Feb-09, at 3:19 PM, Igor Vaynberg wrote:
list? extends string stings=...
strings.add(asd); == wont compile
-igor
On Fri, Feb 27, 2009 at 11:13 AM, Adriano dos Santos Fernandes
adrian...@gmail.com wrote:
What do you mean with read only here?
Adriano
Igor Vaynberg escreveu:
? extends Foo collections are read only, it would be too
inconvenient to make the model collection read only :)
-igor
On Thu, Feb 26, 2009 at 8:34 PM, Jeremy Thomerson
jer...@wickettraining.com wrote:
This is what I was commenting on last week on the list (or earlier
this
week). One expects List? extends Foo while the other expects
ListFoo.
I'm not fully convinced yet that the ? extends is the better
option.
Either way, I think they should be the same.
--
Jeremy Thomerson
http://www.wickettraining.com
On Thu, Feb 26, 2009 at 8:27 PM, Brill Pappin br...@pappin.ca
wrote:
Roughly what I'm doing is:
class TypeA{}
class TypeAModel extends LoadableDetachableModel ListTypeA {
public ListTypeA load(){
... do the load ...
return ...
}
}
TypeAModel model = new TypeAModel();
DropDownChoice TypeA ddc = new DropDownChoiceTypeA(id, model
);
which gets complained about... in this case the generic def is
DropDownChoiceList? extends T
I think the problem is that the generic def of the class should
actually
be
DropDownChoiceListT because you are already identifying the
type
when
you create a new instance.
Now... my generics are a bit hazy at this level, because I can
understand
why it was done that way... does anyone with more generics
experience
know
what it should be? Is this a bug that needs filing?
- Brill
On 26-Feb-09, at 6:03 PM, Kaspar Fischer wrote:
On 26.02.2009, at 22:52, Brill Pappin wrote:
For some reason the DropDownChoice component doesn't have the
same
generics as ListView and it will not accept a model that
listview
will,
despite its saying that it will accept an IModel.
Is anyone else having that sort of trouble with DropDownChoice?
- Brill
Can you give us more information on what exactly is not working
for
you?
DropDownChoice indeed does accept a model, see for instance the
example
in
the class description at
http://wicket.apache.org/docs/1.4/org/apache/wicket/markup/html/form/DropDownChoice.html
This works for me.
Kaspar
--
!-- HTML: --
select wicket:id=site
optionsite 1/option
optionsite 2/option
/select
ul
li wicket:id=site2wicket:container
wicket:id=sitename//li
/ul
// Code
List SITES = Arrays.asList(new String[] {
The Server Side, Java Lobby, Java.Net
});
form.add(new DropDownChoice(site, SITES));
form.add(new ListView(site2, SITES)
{
Re: VOTE: Remove ? extends from constructor of DropDownChoice
Can you remember ever having to do either one of those? I guess I
could see someone trying to do such a thing during the processing of
an AJAX request to perhaps make more stuff show up in the
DDC/ListView. But, for that case, wouldn't it be easier to just
modify the underlying list (I assume they'd use a list because
anything else, such as an LDM, would tend to be read-only)?
On Mon, Mar 2, 2009 at 3:47 PM, Igor Vaynberg igor.vaynb...@gmail.com wrote:
depends on your coding style.
-igor
On Mon, Mar 2, 2009 at 12:44 PM, James Carman
jcar...@carmanconsulting.com wrote:
Aren't both the choices model in DDC and the actual model of
ListView supposed to be considered read-only (as far as the component
is concerned)? The DDC and ListView don't need to be able to alter
those models anyway, right? Perhaps my experience is just too
limited, but I don't think I've ever tried to do either one of your
usecases (I always consider them read-only).
On Mon, Mar 2, 2009 at 3:24 PM, Igor Vaynberg igor.vaynb...@gmail.com
wrote:
see WICKET-2126
-igor
On Mon, Mar 2, 2009 at 12:19 PM, James Carman
jcar...@carmanconsulting.com wrote:
I vote -0.99 on this (non-binding of course). I'd vote +1 to making
ListView accept List? extends T rather than making DDC less
flexible.
On Mon, Mar 2, 2009 at 3:11 PM, Brill Pappin br...@pappin.ca wrote:
Ok, as suggested, here is the thread, and the first vote.
+1
for making the generic definition the same for all list type components.
FYI - you can also vote in the issue I just created at (which might
actually be a better place to vote):
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-2137
- Brill
On 28-Feb-09, at 5:18 PM, Jeremy Thomerson wrote:
Perhaps start a vote thread, with the subject something like: VOTE:
Remove
? extends from constructor of DropDownChoice.
I'd be +1 non-binding
--
Jeremy Thomerson
http://www.wickettraining.com
On Sat, Feb 28, 2009 at 3:33 PM, Brill Pappin br...@pappin.ca wrote:
I'm of the don't widen it camp anyway :)
So how do I go about gathering support for having the DropDownChoice
work
with the models the way everything else does?
- Brill
On 28-Feb-09, at 1:42 AM, Igor Vaynberg wrote:
yes, the choice was intentional. personally i do not care if it is T
all the way, some users complained so we widened it on the choices
model, we cannot widen it on the main model.
-igor
On Fri, Feb 27, 2009 at 8:51 PM, Brill Pappin br...@pappin.ca wrote:
I see... but this would i think because Bar is a Foo:
class Bar exends Foo {}
List? extends Foo list = ...
list.add(new Bar());
Anyway, what your saying is that the generics choice was intentional?
- Brill
On 27-Feb-09, at 3:19 PM, Igor Vaynberg wrote:
list? extends string stings=...
strings.add(asd); == wont compile
-igor
On Fri, Feb 27, 2009 at 11:13 AM, Adriano dos Santos Fernandes
adrian...@gmail.com wrote:
What do you mean with read only here?
Adriano
Igor Vaynberg escreveu:
? extends Foo collections are read only, it would be too
inconvenient to make the model collection read only :)
-igor
On Thu, Feb 26, 2009 at 8:34 PM, Jeremy Thomerson
jer...@wickettraining.com wrote:
This is what I was commenting on last week on the list (or earlier
this
week). One expects List? extends Foo while the other expects
ListFoo.
I'm not fully convinced yet that the ? extends is the better
option.
Either way, I think they should be the same.
--
Jeremy Thomerson
http://www.wickettraining.com
On Thu, Feb 26, 2009 at 8:27 PM, Brill Pappin br...@pappin.ca
wrote:
Roughly what I'm doing is:
class TypeA{}
class TypeAModel extends LoadableDetachableModel ListTypeA {
public ListTypeA load(){
... do the load ...
return ...
}
}
TypeAModel model = new TypeAModel();
DropDownChoice TypeA ddc = new DropDownChoiceTypeA(id,
model
);
which gets complained about... in this case the generic def is
DropDownChoiceList? extends T
I think the problem is that the generic def of the class should
actually
be
DropDownChoiceListT because you are already identifying the
type
when
you create a new instance.
Now... my generics are a bit hazy at this level, because I can
understand
why it was done that way... does anyone with more generics
experience
know
what it should be? Is this a bug that needs filing?
- Brill
On 26-Feb-09, at 6:03 PM, Kaspar Fischer wrote:
On 26.02.2009, at 22:52, Brill Pappin wrote:
For some reason the DropDownChoice component doesn't have the
same
generics as ListView and it will not accept a model that
listview
will,
despite its saying that it will accept an IModel.
Is anyone else having that sort of trouble with DropDownChoice?
- Brill
Can you give us more information on what exactly is not working
for
you?
DropDownChoice indeed does accept a model, see for instance the
example
in
the class description at
Re: VOTE: Remove ? extends from constructor of DropDownChoice
i also dont remember using a compound property model...can we remove that?
-igor
On Mon, Mar 2, 2009 at 12:57 PM, James Carman
jcar...@carmanconsulting.com wrote:
Can you remember ever having to do either one of those? I guess I
could see someone trying to do such a thing during the processing of
an AJAX request to perhaps make more stuff show up in the
DDC/ListView. But, for that case, wouldn't it be easier to just
modify the underlying list (I assume they'd use a list because
anything else, such as an LDM, would tend to be read-only)?
On Mon, Mar 2, 2009 at 3:47 PM, Igor Vaynberg igor.vaynb...@gmail.com wrote:
depends on your coding style.
-igor
On Mon, Mar 2, 2009 at 12:44 PM, James Carman
jcar...@carmanconsulting.com wrote:
Aren't both the choices model in DDC and the actual model of
ListView supposed to be considered read-only (as far as the component
is concerned)? The DDC and ListView don't need to be able to alter
those models anyway, right? Perhaps my experience is just too
limited, but I don't think I've ever tried to do either one of your
usecases (I always consider them read-only).
On Mon, Mar 2, 2009 at 3:24 PM, Igor Vaynberg igor.vaynb...@gmail.com
wrote:
see WICKET-2126
-igor
On Mon, Mar 2, 2009 at 12:19 PM, James Carman
jcar...@carmanconsulting.com wrote:
I vote -0.99 on this (non-binding of course). I'd vote +1 to making
ListView accept List? extends T rather than making DDC less
flexible.
On Mon, Mar 2, 2009 at 3:11 PM, Brill Pappin br...@pappin.ca wrote:
Ok, as suggested, here is the thread, and the first vote.
+1
for making the generic definition the same for all list type components.
FYI - you can also vote in the issue I just created at (which might
actually be a better place to vote):
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-2137
- Brill
On 28-Feb-09, at 5:18 PM, Jeremy Thomerson wrote:
Perhaps start a vote thread, with the subject something like: VOTE:
Remove
? extends from constructor of DropDownChoice.
I'd be +1 non-binding
--
Jeremy Thomerson
http://www.wickettraining.com
On Sat, Feb 28, 2009 at 3:33 PM, Brill Pappin br...@pappin.ca wrote:
I'm of the don't widen it camp anyway :)
So how do I go about gathering support for having the DropDownChoice
work
with the models the way everything else does?
- Brill
On 28-Feb-09, at 1:42 AM, Igor Vaynberg wrote:
yes, the choice was intentional. personally i do not care if it is T
all the way, some users complained so we widened it on the choices
model, we cannot widen it on the main model.
-igor
On Fri, Feb 27, 2009 at 8:51 PM, Brill Pappin br...@pappin.ca wrote:
I see... but this would i think because Bar is a Foo:
class Bar exends Foo {}
List? extends Foo list = ...
list.add(new Bar());
Anyway, what your saying is that the generics choice was intentional?
- Brill
On 27-Feb-09, at 3:19 PM, Igor Vaynberg wrote:
list? extends string stings=...
strings.add(asd); == wont compile
-igor
On Fri, Feb 27, 2009 at 11:13 AM, Adriano dos Santos Fernandes
adrian...@gmail.com wrote:
What do you mean with read only here?
Adriano
Igor Vaynberg escreveu:
? extends Foo collections are read only, it would be too
inconvenient to make the model collection read only :)
-igor
On Thu, Feb 26, 2009 at 8:34 PM, Jeremy Thomerson
jer...@wickettraining.com wrote:
This is what I was commenting on last week on the list (or
earlier
this
week). One expects List? extends Foo while the other expects
ListFoo.
I'm not fully convinced yet that the ? extends is the better
option.
Either way, I think they should be the same.
--
Jeremy Thomerson
http://www.wickettraining.com
On Thu, Feb 26, 2009 at 8:27 PM, Brill Pappin br...@pappin.ca
wrote:
Roughly what I'm doing is:
class TypeA{}
class TypeAModel extends LoadableDetachableModel ListTypeA {
public ListTypeA load(){
... do the load ...
return ...
}
}
TypeAModel model = new TypeAModel();
DropDownChoice TypeA ddc = new DropDownChoiceTypeA(id,
model
);
which gets complained about... in this case the generic def is
DropDownChoiceList? extends T
I think the problem is that the generic def of the class should
actually
be
DropDownChoiceListT because you are already identifying the
type
when
you create a new instance.
Now... my generics are a bit hazy at this level, because I can
understand
why it was done that way... does anyone with more generics
experience
know
what it should be? Is this a bug that needs filing?
- Brill
On 26-Feb-09, at 6:03 PM, Kaspar Fischer wrote:
On 26.02.2009, at 22:52, Brill Pappin wrote:
For some reason the DropDownChoice component doesn't have the
same
generics as ListView and it will not accept a model that
listview
will,
despite its saying that it will accept an IModel.
Is anyone else having that sort of trouble with
DropDownChoice?
- Brill
Can you give us more
Help with SecondLevelCache and Serialization
I have been running on the HttpSessionStore for a good year now.
HttpSessions are clustered and have been working fine for all this
time. As of recently I have switched to SecondLevelCache and
DiskPageStore to avoid HttpSession bloat and still have fail over.
I have run into an odd issue with serialization which throws a
stackoverflow exception. Here is the cause:
Passing an LDM model as-is to a page, it will stackoverflow on the
receiving page, if that page is refreshed twice or a form has been
submitted.
Here is an example...
setResponsePage(new EditBlogPage(new LoadableDetachableModelBlog() {
private static final long serialVersionUID = 1L;
@Override
protected Blog load() {
// just an example
return new Blog();
}
}));
However, if I subclass the LDM and pass it like so, it will work just
fine.
public class FakeLDM extends LoadableDetachableModelBlog {
private static final long serialVersionUID = 1L;
@Override
protected Blog load() {
return new Blog();
}
}
setResponsePage(new EditBlogPage(new FakeLDM()));
One last thing, If I construct the LDM inside the receiving page. It
will work fine as well.
This seems to only happen with the SecondLevelCache, any ideas?
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: Help with SecondLevelCache and Serialization
when you construct it using the first example you showed (anonymous
class) the ldm is carrying a reference to the page on which it is
constructed. so your editblogpage is indirectly holding onto the
instance of the previous page, perhaps that is what is causing the
problem. please file a jira issue.
-igor
On Mon, Mar 2, 2009 at 1:30 PM, Victor Igumnov vict...@fabulously40.com wrote:
I have been running on the HttpSessionStore for a good year now.
HttpSessions are clustered and have been working fine for all this time. As
of recently I have switched to SecondLevelCache and DiskPageStore to avoid
HttpSession bloat and still have fail over.
I have run into an odd issue with serialization which throws a stackoverflow
exception. Here is the cause:
Passing an LDM model as-is to a page, it will stackoverflow on the receiving
page, if that page is refreshed twice or a form has been submitted.
Here is an example...
setResponsePage(new EditBlogPage(new LoadableDetachableModelBlog() {
private static final long serialVersionUID = 1L;
�...@override
protected Blog load() {
// just an example
return new Blog();
}
}));
However, if I subclass the LDM and pass it like so, it will work just fine.
public class FakeLDM extends LoadableDetachableModelBlog {
private static final long serialVersionUID = 1L;
�...@override
protected Blog load() {
return new Blog();
}
}
setResponsePage(new EditBlogPage(new FakeLDM()));
One last thing, If I construct the LDM inside the receiving page. It will
work fine as well.
This seems to only happen with the SecondLevelCache, any ideas?
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: Help with SecondLevelCache and Serialization
Igor,
Thanks for the confirmation, this is exactly what I thought. I will
submit a bug report now.
This seems exactly like that other issue that someone had with JBoss
clustered sessions.
On Mar 2, 2009, at 1:35 PM, Igor Vaynberg wrote:
when you construct it using the first example you showed (anonymous
class) the ldm is carrying a reference to the page on which it is
constructed. so your editblogpage is indirectly holding onto the
instance of the previous page, perhaps that is what is causing the
problem. please file a jira issue.
-igor
On Mon, Mar 2, 2009 at 1:30 PM, Victor Igumnov vict...@fabulously40.com
wrote:
I have been running on the HttpSessionStore for a good year now.
HttpSessions are clustered and have been working fine for all this
time. As
of recently I have switched to SecondLevelCache and DiskPageStore
to avoid
HttpSession bloat and still have fail over.
I have run into an odd issue with serialization which throws a
stackoverflow
exception. Here is the cause:
Passing an LDM model as-is to a page, it will stackoverflow on the
receiving
page, if that page is refreshed twice or a form has been submitted.
Here is an example...
setResponsePage(new EditBlogPage(new
LoadableDetachableModelBlog() {
private static final long serialVersionUID = 1L;
@Override
protected Blog load() {
// just an example
return new Blog();
}
}));
However, if I subclass the LDM and pass it like so, it will work
just fine.
public class FakeLDM extends LoadableDetachableModelBlog {
private static final long serialVersionUID = 1L;
@Override
protected Blog load() {
return new Blog();
}
}
setResponsePage(new EditBlogPage(new FakeLDM()));
One last thing, If I construct the LDM inside the receiving page.
It will
work fine as well.
This seems to only happen with the SecondLevelCache, any ideas?
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Migration from servlet to filter always serves WebApplication.getHomePage() when I click on links
Hello, I am using 1.3 and a servlet for Wicket in my web.xml, which I've pasted below. I am trying to change to using a Filter instead, which I also pasted below, but I get a weird behavior -- my WebApp.getHomePage() is served every time I click on a link. The links work fine when I use the servlet, and I followed the migration guide ( http://cwiki.apache.org/WICKET/migrate-13.html#Migrate-1.3-FilterinsteadofaServlet ), so I am not sure why I am getting this behavior. Any ideas? --- !-- This works -- servlet servlet-nameMyWebApp/servlet-name servlet-classorg.apache.wicket.protocol.http.WicketServlet/servlet-class init-param param-nameapplicationClassName/param-name param-valuemy.WebApp/param-value /init-param load-on-startup1/load-on-startup /servlet servlet-mapping servlet-nameMyWebApp/servlet-name url-pattern/app/*/url-pattern /servlet-mapping --- !-- This does not work -- filter filter-nameMyWebApp/filter-name filter-classorg.apache.wicket.protocol.http.WicketFilter/filter-class init-param param-nameapplicationClassName/param-name param-valuemy.WebApp/param-value /init-param /filter filter-mapping filter-nameMyWebApp/filter-name url-pattern/app/*/url-pattern /filter-mapping -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Migration-from-servlet-to-filter-always-serves-WebApplication.getHomePage%28%29-when-I-click-on-links-tp22298026p22298026.html Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: Migration from servlet to filter always serves WebApplication.getHomePage() when I click on links
try with /* mapping and see if it works you are not running this on websphere are you? -igor On Mon, Mar 2, 2009 at 2:12 PM, mallet ryanlahue...@gmail.com wrote: Hello, I am using 1.3 and a servlet for Wicket in my web.xml, which I've pasted below. I am trying to change to using a Filter instead, which I also pasted below, but I get a weird behavior -- my WebApp.getHomePage() is served every time I click on a link. The links work fine when I use the servlet, and I followed the migration guide ( http://cwiki.apache.org/WICKET/migrate-13.html#Migrate-1.3-FilterinsteadofaServlet ), so I am not sure why I am getting this behavior. Any ideas? --- !-- This works -- servlet servlet-nameMyWebApp/servlet-name servlet-classorg.apache.wicket.protocol.http.WicketServlet/servlet-class init-param param-nameapplicationClassName/param-name param-valuemy.WebApp/param-value /init-param load-on-startup1/load-on-startup /servlet servlet-mapping servlet-nameMyWebApp/servlet-name url-pattern/app/*/url-pattern /servlet-mapping --- !-- This does not work -- filter filter-nameMyWebApp/filter-name filter-classorg.apache.wicket.protocol.http.WicketFilter/filter-class init-param param-nameapplicationClassName/param-name param-valuemy.WebApp/param-value /init-param /filter filter-mapping filter-nameMyWebApp/filter-name url-pattern/app/*/url-pattern /filter-mapping -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Migration-from-servlet-to-filter-always-serves-WebApplication.getHomePage%28%29-when-I-click-on-links-tp22298026p22298026.html Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
multiple feedback panels in same page
Hi, I have two feedback panels in the same page and want to direct my info message to only one of them. Any ideas on how to do this? Right now when I do info(hello) hello shows up in both panels. Thanks, Jason -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/multiple-feedback-panels-in-same-page-tp22298693p22298693.html Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: multiple feedback panels in same page
there's a filter interface that you can use with the feedback panel that allows you to filter just the messages you want in that panel. i.e., you could have a FBP by every form component and only show the messages generated by that component. -- Jeremy Thomerson http://www.wickettraining.com On Mon, Mar 2, 2009 at 4:54 PM, novotny novo...@gridsphere.org wrote: Hi, I have two feedback panels in the same page and want to direct my info message to only one of them. Any ideas on how to do this? Right now when I do info(hello) hello shows up in both panels. Thanks, Jason -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/multiple-feedback-panels-in-same-page-tp22298693p22298693.html Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: multiple feedback panels in same page
Do you have some simple example where only a feedback message created from the class that page that instantiates the feedbackpanel can display a message... or maybe any example will do since I couldn't see any from googling... :-) Thanks again, Jason novotny wrote: Hi, I have two feedback panels in the same page and want to direct my info message to only one of them. Any ideas on how to do this? Right now when I do info(hello) hello shows up in both panels. Thanks, Jason -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/multiple-feedback-panels-in-same-page-tp22298693p22298900.html Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: multiple feedback panels in same page
Best thing for you to do would be browse the source of the already-implemented-in-core implementations: IFeedbackMessageFilter All Known Implementing Classes: ComponentFeedbackMessageFilter, ContainerFeedbackMessageFilter, ErrorLevelFeedbackMessageFilter On Mon, Mar 2, 2009 at 5:04 PM, novotny novo...@gridsphere.org wrote: Do you have some simple example where only a feedback message created from the class that page that instantiates the feedbackpanel can display a message... or maybe any example will do since I couldn't see any from googling... :-) Thanks again, Jason novotny wrote: Hi, I have two feedback panels in the same page and want to direct my info message to only one of them. Any ideas on how to do this? Right now when I do info(hello) hello shows up in both panels. Thanks, Jason -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/multiple-feedback-panels-in-same-page-tp22298693p22298900.html Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org -- Jeremy Thomerson http://www.wickettraining.com
Re: Migration from servlet to filter always serves WebApplication.getHomePage() when I click on links
Thanks for the quick response Igor. I'm running OC4J... I changed the mapping as you suggested but am now getting a 403/Directory browsing not allowed. Once I find a way to coerce oc4j into allowing directory browsing I will post an update -- having some trouble getting my orion-web.xml changes to take, but this is not a wicket issue. igor.vaynberg wrote: try with /* mapping and see if it works you are not running this on websphere are you? -igor On Mon, Mar 2, 2009 at 2:12 PM, mallet ryanlahue...@gmail.com wrote: Hello, I am using 1.3 and a servlet for Wicket in my web.xml, which I've pasted below. I am trying to change to using a Filter instead, which I also pasted below, but I get a weird behavior -- my WebApp.getHomePage() is served every time I click on a link. The links work fine when I use the servlet, and I followed the migration guide ( http://cwiki.apache.org/WICKET/migrate-13.html#Migrate-1.3-FilterinsteadofaServlet ), so I am not sure why I am getting this behavior. Any ideas? --- !-- This works -- servlet servlet-nameMyWebApp/servlet-name servlet-classorg.apache.wicket.protocol.http.WicketServlet/servlet-class init-param param-nameapplicationClassName/param-name param-valuemy.WebApp/param-value /init-param load-on-startup1/load-on-startup /servlet servlet-mapping servlet-nameMyWebApp/servlet-name url-pattern/app/*/url-pattern /servlet-mapping --- !-- This does not work -- filter filter-nameMyWebApp/filter-name filter-classorg.apache.wicket.protocol.http.WicketFilter/filter-class init-param param-nameapplicationClassName/param-name param-valuemy.WebApp/param-value /init-param /filter filter-mapping filter-nameMyWebApp/filter-name url-pattern/app/*/url-pattern /filter-mapping -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Migration-from-servlet-to-filter-always-serves-WebApplication.getHomePage%28%29-when-I-click-on-links-tp22298026p22298026.html Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Migration-from-servlet-to-filter-always-serves-WebApplication.getHomePage%28%29-when-I-click-on-links-tp22298026p22299235.html Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: multiple feedback panels in same page
Great-- for those googling, this works: final FormString form = new FormString(form); ComponentFeedbackMessageFilter filter = new ComponentFeedbackMessageFilter(form); FeedbackPanel feedback = new FeedbackPanel(feedback, filter); feedback.setEscapeModelStrings(false); add(feedback); and then elsewhere in the code I can do: form.info(hello world); Thanks! Jeremy Thomerson-5 wrote: there's a filter interface that you can use with the feedback panel that allows you to filter just the messages you want in that panel. i.e., you could have a FBP by every form component and only show the messages generated by that component. -- Jeremy Thomerson http://www.wickettraining.com On Mon, Mar 2, 2009 at 4:54 PM, novotny novo...@gridsphere.org wrote: Hi, I have two feedback panels in the same page and want to direct my info message to only one of them. Any ideas on how to do this? Right now when I do info(hello) hello shows up in both panels. Thanks, Jason -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/multiple-feedback-panels-in-same-page-tp22298693p22298693.html Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/multiple-feedback-panels-in-same-page-tp22298693p22299635.html Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Markup inheritance and composition mix
Hi everyone, I am new to wicket and I am encountering a problem when I am trying to mix some panel inheritance and composition. I don't know whether I'm doing something wrong or it is not supposed to work like that but hope you can help with some advice. So here's my hierarchy : Panel - A - B . This is an inheritance relationship where panel B extends panel A which extends Panel. Panel - C . If I add panel B and panel C to a page everything works fine. If I am trying to add panel C to panel B ( bPanelInstance.add(C) ) and add panel B to the page then I am getting into problems (even if C is an EmptyPanel instance) : If I have [C content] I get an exception saying that the end tag for panel b is missing, though the end tag is there. Here's a sample of my exception where the name login equates to b from my exmaple. WicketMessage: close tag not found for tag: . Component: [MarkupContainer [Component id = login]] Root cause: org.apache.wicket.markup.MarkupException: close tag not found for tag: . Component: [MarkupContainer [Component id = login]] at org.apache.wicket.markup.html.panel.Panel.onComponentTagBody(Panel.java:123) at org.apache.wicket.Component.renderComponent(Component.java:2596) at org.apache.wicket.MarkupContainer.onRender(MarkupContainer.java:1521) at org.apache.wicket.Component.render(Component.java:2421) at org.apache.wicket.MarkupContainer.renderNext(MarkupContainer.java:1399) at org.apache.wicket.MarkupContainer.renderAll(MarkupContainer.java:1537) at org.apache.wicket.Page.onRender(Page.java:1522) at org.apache.wicket.Component.render(Component.java:2421) at org.apache.wicket.Page.renderPage(Page.java:926) Adding a panel to another one works fine unless is one of my extended panels, therefore I guess it's something that I am missing when I am extending the panels. The way I am extending the panels is standard and only I only override that required constructor and nothing else. To summarize : I have some markup inheritance with panels which works fine. I get the above error when I am trying to add a panel using Panel's add method to my extended panels. The html markup it's correct and it's not missing any tags. Markup inheritance is done in the simplest way by only providing the panel id constructor. Do you have any idea why this happens ? If you think it should not happen, you have tried it, you do not get into this and cannot reproduce the error, can you provide a simple working example of this scenario ? I am using Wicket 1.4-rc2. Thanks very much, Kind Regards, Razvan -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Markup-inheritance-and-composition-mix-tp22300927p22300927.html Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: Markup inheritance and composition mix
there where seems that text is missing is 2 spans ... one contains the other one. B contains C Dragut Razvan wrote: Hi everyone, I am new to wicket and I am encountering a problem when I am trying to mix some panel inheritance and composition. I don't know whether I'm doing something wrong or it is not supposed to work like that but hope you can help with some advice. So here's my hierarchy : Panel - A - B . This is an inheritance relationship where panel B extends panel A which extends Panel. Panel - C . If I add panel B and panel C to a page everything works fine. If I am trying to add panel C to panel B ( bPanelInstance.add(C) ) and add panel B to the page then I am getting into problems (even if C is an EmptyPanel instance) : If I have [C content] I get an exception saying that the end tag for panel b is missing, though the end tag is there. Here's a sample of my exception where the name login equates to b from my exmaple. WicketMessage: close tag not found for tag: . Component: [MarkupContainer [Component id = login]] Root cause: org.apache.wicket.markup.MarkupException: close tag not found for tag: . Component: [MarkupContainer [Component id = login]] at org.apache.wicket.markup.html.panel.Panel.onComponentTagBody(Panel.java:123) at org.apache.wicket.Component.renderComponent(Component.java:2596) at org.apache.wicket.MarkupContainer.onRender(MarkupContainer.java:1521) at org.apache.wicket.Component.render(Component.java:2421) at org.apache.wicket.MarkupContainer.renderNext(MarkupContainer.java:1399) at org.apache.wicket.MarkupContainer.renderAll(MarkupContainer.java:1537) at org.apache.wicket.Page.onRender(Page.java:1522) at org.apache.wicket.Component.render(Component.java:2421) at org.apache.wicket.Page.renderPage(Page.java:926) Adding a panel to another one works fine unless is one of my extended panels, therefore I guess it's something that I am missing when I am extending the panels. The way I am extending the panels is standard and only I only override that required constructor and nothing else. To summarize : I have some markup inheritance with panels which works fine. I get the above error when I am trying to add a panel using Panel's add method to my extended panels. The html markup it's correct and it's not missing any tags. Markup inheritance is done in the simplest way by only providing the panel id constructor. Do you have any idea why this happens ? If you think it should not happen, you have tried it, you do not get into this and cannot reproduce the error, can you provide a simple working example of this scenario ? I am using Wicket 1.4-rc2. Thanks very much, Kind Regards, Razvan -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Markup-inheritance-and-composition-mix-tp22300927p22300977.html Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: Markup inheritance and composition mix
sorry for posting for the third time but need to make sure everything is visible : [C content] Dragut Razvan wrote: there where seems that text is missing is 2 spans ... one contains the other one. B contains C Dragut Razvan wrote: Hi everyone, I am new to wicket and I am encountering a problem when I am trying to mix some panel inheritance and composition. I don't know whether I'm doing something wrong or it is not supposed to work like that but hope you can help with some advice. So here's my hierarchy : Panel - A - B . This is an inheritance relationship where panel B extends panel A which extends Panel. Panel - C . If I add panel B and panel C to a page everything works fine. If I am trying to add panel C to panel B ( bPanelInstance.add(C) ) and add panel B to the page then I am getting into problems (even if C is an EmptyPanel instance) : If I have [C content] I get an exception saying that the end tag for panel b is missing, though the end tag is there. Here's a sample of my exception where the name login equates to b from my exmaple. WicketMessage: close tag not found for tag: . Component: [MarkupContainer [Component id = login]] Root cause: org.apache.wicket.markup.MarkupException: close tag not found for tag: . Component: [MarkupContainer [Component id = login]] at org.apache.wicket.markup.html.panel.Panel.onComponentTagBody(Panel.java:123) at org.apache.wicket.Component.renderComponent(Component.java:2596) at org.apache.wicket.MarkupContainer.onRender(MarkupContainer.java:1521) at org.apache.wicket.Component.render(Component.java:2421) at org.apache.wicket.MarkupContainer.renderNext(MarkupContainer.java:1399) at org.apache.wicket.MarkupContainer.renderAll(MarkupContainer.java:1537) at org.apache.wicket.Page.onRender(Page.java:1522) at org.apache.wicket.Component.render(Component.java:2421) at org.apache.wicket.Page.renderPage(Page.java:926) Adding a panel to another one works fine unless is one of my extended panels, therefore I guess it's something that I am missing when I am extending the panels. The way I am extending the panels is standard and only I only override that required constructor and nothing else. To summarize : I have some markup inheritance with panels which works fine. I get the above error when I am trying to add a panel using Panel's add method to my extended panels. The html markup it's correct and it's not missing any tags. Markup inheritance is done in the simplest way by only providing the panel id constructor. Do you have any idea why this happens ? If you think it should not happen, you have tried it, you do not get into this and cannot reproduce the error, can you provide a simple working example of this scenario ? I am using Wicket 1.4-rc2. Thanks very much, Kind Regards, Razvan -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Markup-inheritance-and-composition-mix-tp22300927p22301004.html Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
[off topic] was: VOTE: Remove ? extends from constructor of DropDownChoice
i also dont remember using a compound property model...can we remove that? hehe - i haven't used that either. + 1 on removing cpm! ;-) Best reagards, --- Jan. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Question re: style and variation
Hi, I have browsed/read the previous threads regarding this topic and read the wiki on styling and localisation - but its inconclusive as to how this should be tackled. I have my app running on multiple domains. Each domain - when you hit it, sets a style into the session - so they appear to be different apps. So I can have something like MyPanel_client1_en_AU.html most of the time this will resolve to MyPanel.html Now, if I want to have a component implemented inside MyPanel, with its own variant, then I was hoping to do this: MyComponent_myVariant.html However - the lookup I get is MyComponent_myVariant_client1_en_AU.html ... MyComponent_myVariant_client1.html MyComponent.html It treats myVariant_client1 as a single style value. Now - the wiki says that this is expected (see http://cwiki.apache.org/WICKET/localization-and-skinning-of-applications.html) - it also says that the possibilities are exponential ;) How would I achieve variants working in conjunction with style? Seems the touchpoints would be writing my own ResourceNameIterator, and writing my own ResourceStreamLocator. Surely there is a cleaner simpler way - It feels dirty having to add this functionality, and the existence of ResourceNameIterator and ResourceStreamLocator indicates that it has already been thought about a fair amount. -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Question-re%3A-style-and-variation-tp22302526p22302526.html Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: Question re: style and variation
the problem is, if you have MyPanel_foo.html, is foo the style, the variation, or the locale? perhaps we can identify the parts differently...needs some thinking. -igor On Mon, Mar 2, 2009 at 8:57 PM, Ned Collyer ned.coll...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, I have browsed/read the previous threads regarding this topic and read the wiki on styling and localisation - but its inconclusive as to how this should be tackled. I have my app running on multiple domains. Each domain - when you hit it, sets a style into the session - so they appear to be different apps. So I can have something like MyPanel_client1_en_AU.html most of the time this will resolve to MyPanel.html Now, if I want to have a component implemented inside MyPanel, with its own variant, then I was hoping to do this: MyComponent_myVariant.html However - the lookup I get is MyComponent_myVariant_client1_en_AU.html ... MyComponent_myVariant_client1.html MyComponent.html It treats myVariant_client1 as a single style value. Now - the wiki says that this is expected (see http://cwiki.apache.org/WICKET/localization-and-skinning-of-applications.html) - it also says that the possibilities are exponential ;) How would I achieve variants working in conjunction with style? Seems the touchpoints would be writing my own ResourceNameIterator, and writing my own ResourceStreamLocator. Surely there is a cleaner simpler way - It feels dirty having to add this functionality, and the existence of ResourceNameIterator and ResourceStreamLocator indicates that it has already been thought about a fair amount. -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Question-re%3A-style-and-variation-tp22302526p22302526.html Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: Another borders scenario
The only way I found is to hold reference to added border inside to be extended class and to do getBorder().add(new Link(link)); in child constructor. May be there exists better approach? On Mon, Mar 2, 2009 at 11:41 PM, Anton Veretennikov anton.veretenni...@gmail.com wrote: Hello! I'm again with borders. May be I'm not using them right... Is everything okey with this mix of border and child: Block.html: wicket:panel div wicket:id=border wicket:child / /div /wicket:panel Block.java (extends Panel) add(new RoundedCornersPanelGrey(border)); ChildBlock.html: wicket:extend a wicket:id=linklink/a /wicket:extend ChildBlock.java (extends Block) add(new Link(link) It doesn't work with border in Block (can't find component). It works only without border or with border in ChildBlock around a. -- Tony. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Repeater that disposses content after rendering?
Hi, perhaps this does not make sense, but is there a Component that discards all child components after the rendering, before the serialization? Would this make sense for components that render a large amount of child's (tables with many cells) where all of them could be reconstructed from a LDM in the repeater? Would this save space in the page store / session? Thanks in advance. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: Question re: style and variation
Yep :). I at least 1 thought on this matter. Currently, I have a webapp module - which will have my components in it, and my components variants. I have pushed all i18n into properties files - which is working thus far. I allow the clients to customise their HTML from another folder - ie, someplace on the filesystem outside of the war. The lookup for html files for me .. should be custom dir - myPanel_myVariant_myStyle.html webapp.war - myPanel_myVariant_myStyle.html custom dir - myPanel_myVariant.html webapp.war - myPanel_myVariant.html custom dir - myPanel_myStyle.html webapp.war - myPanel_myStyle.html custom dir - myPanel.html webapp.war - myPanel.html I have a similar thing in place for properties files - and the result is actually a merge of the properties between filesystem and classpath. So many ways to skin a cat. If only we could skin this cat with locale, style AND variant - each optional. More static count of delimiters? Folder structure? Different delimiters? Different data in filename? Contents of file? The balancing act is keeping it simple - which its currently nailed, but not quite as useful as it could be!!! igor.vaynberg wrote: the problem is, if you have MyPanel_foo.html, is foo the style, the variation, or the locale? perhaps we can identify the parts differently...needs some thinking. -igor -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Question-re%3A-style-and-variation-tp22302526p22303708.html Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
