Re: Usage of Servlets in Wicket, How ?
I want to upload files through Commons FIleUpload API. As Commons FileUpload API requires HttpServletRequest for uploading files (e.g. fileItemsList = servletFileUpload.parseRequest(httpServletRequest)). Parsing HttpServletRequest is the necessary step while uploading in Commons FileUpload. I have got httpServletRequest from RequestCycle. e.g. ((ServletWebRequest) getRequest()).getHttpServletRequest() or ((WebRequest)requestCycle.getRequest()).getHttpServletRequest() but this request already being parsed automatically in RequestCycle, before reaching servletFileUpload.parseRequest(httpServletRequest). So, Request is already been parsed... exception occur. That's why i want to use Servlet's doGet(request, response) method for getting HttpServletRequest(without parsing). If not servlets, Is there any other way to handle FileUploading (through Apache Commons API) in wicket ? Thanks... From: Peter Thomas ptrtho...@gmail.com To: users@wicket.apache.org Sent: Tuesday, September 8, 2009 11:39:58 AM Subject: Re: Usage of Servlets in Wicket, How ? Refer this: http://cwiki.apache.org/WICKET/how-to-redirect-to-an-external-non-wicket-page.html If that doesn't help you should briefly explain what your requirement is. There may be a better way to achieve it within Wicket instead of hacking around with servlets. On Tue, Sep 8, 2009 at 10:57 AM, FaRHaN farhan.ba...@ymail.com wrote: but how can we call it from our wicket web page ? From: Jeremy Thomerson jer...@wickettraining.com To: users@wicket.apache.org Sent: Tuesday, September 8, 2009 11:10:49 AM Subject: Re: Usage of Servlets in Wicket, How ? servlets are totally separate from Wicket - write a servlet and add it to your web.xml. See any servlet example on the web (non-Wicket related) for assistance. -- Jeremy Thomerson http://www.wickettraining.com On Mon, Sep 7, 2009 at 11:54 PM, FaRHaN farhan.ba...@ymail.com wrote: Hi, Is there any example in Wicket that uses Servlets (doGet() doPost()). I mean how can we configure Servlets in our wicket application and use doGet(request, response) doPost(request, response) methods. I know web.xml configuration for Servlets but how can we use doGet() doPost() methods. Do we need wicket:ids in Servlets ? Is there any reference for such type of example ? Thanks...
Re: Usage of Servlets in Wicket, How ?
Maybe if you mention the specific reason(s) that you want to use Apache Commons FileUpload API rather than Wicket's built-in forms and file upload mechanisms, someone on the list will be able to provide you with more help. It seems that the FileUpload API is intended to help you if you have to write servlets to handle forms. But with Wicket, you don't have to do this. And if you use ACFU API, then you lose the rest of Wicket's stateful form handling. -- Jeremy Thomerson http://www.wickettraining.com On Tue, Sep 8, 2009 at 1:04 AM, FaRHaN farhan.ba...@ymail.com wrote: I want to upload files through Commons FIleUpload API. As Commons FileUpload API requires HttpServletRequest for uploading files (e.g. fileItemsList = servletFileUpload.parseRequest(httpServletRequest)). Parsing HttpServletRequest is the necessary step while uploading in Commons FileUpload. I have got httpServletRequest from RequestCycle. e.g. ((ServletWebRequest) getRequest()).getHttpServletRequest() or ((WebRequest)requestCycle.getRequest()).getHttpServletRequest() but this request already being parsed automatically in RequestCycle, before reaching servletFileUpload.parseRequest(httpServletRequest). So, Request is already been parsed... exception occur. That's why i want to use Servlet's doGet(request, response) method for getting HttpServletRequest(without parsing). If not servlets, Is there any other way to handle FileUploading (through Apache Commons API) in wicket ? Thanks... From: Peter Thomas ptrtho...@gmail.com To: users@wicket.apache.org Sent: Tuesday, September 8, 2009 11:39:58 AM Subject: Re: Usage of Servlets in Wicket, How ? Refer this: http://cwiki.apache.org/WICKET/how-to-redirect-to-an-external-non-wicket-page.html If that doesn't help you should briefly explain what your requirement is. There may be a better way to achieve it within Wicket instead of hacking around with servlets. On Tue, Sep 8, 2009 at 10:57 AM, FaRHaN farhan.ba...@ymail.com wrote: but how can we call it from our wicket web page ? From: Jeremy Thomerson jer...@wickettraining.com To: users@wicket.apache.org Sent: Tuesday, September 8, 2009 11:10:49 AM Subject: Re: Usage of Servlets in Wicket, How ? servlets are totally separate from Wicket - write a servlet and add it to your web.xml. See any servlet example on the web (non-Wicket related) for assistance. -- Jeremy Thomerson http://www.wickettraining.com On Mon, Sep 7, 2009 at 11:54 PM, FaRHaN farhan.ba...@ymail.com wrote: Hi, Is there any example in Wicket that uses Servlets (doGet() doPost()). I mean how can we configure Servlets in our wicket application and use doGet(request, response) doPost(request, response) methods. I know web.xml configuration for Servlets but how can we use doGet() doPost() methods. Do we need wicket:ids in Servlets ? Is there any reference for such type of example ? Thanks...
Re: Usage of Servlets in Wicket, How ?
I want to make it a separate API for file uploading. So that i can embed it in any of the application regardless of the framework (wicket, JSF, struts etc.). The only reason is that, we can use Apache Commons FileUpload API in any of the framework. Is there any workaround to do this ? From: Jeremy Thomerson jer...@wickettraining.com To: users@wicket.apache.org Sent: Tuesday, September 8, 2009 12:44:08 PM Subject: Re: Usage of Servlets in Wicket, How ? Maybe if you mention the specific reason(s) that you want to use Apache Commons FileUpload API rather than Wicket's built-in forms and file upload mechanisms, someone on the list will be able to provide you with more help. It seems that the FileUpload API is intended to help you if you have to write servlets to handle forms. But with Wicket, you don't have to do this. And if you use ACFU API, then you lose the rest of Wicket's stateful form handling. -- Jeremy Thomerson http://www.wickettraining.com On Tue, Sep 8, 2009 at 1:04 AM, FaRHaN farhan.ba...@ymail.com wrote: I want to upload files through Commons FIleUpload API. As Commons FileUpload API requires HttpServletRequest for uploading files (e.g. fileItemsList = servletFileUpload.parseRequest(httpServletRequest)). Parsing HttpServletRequest is the necessary step while uploading in Commons FileUpload. I have got httpServletRequest from RequestCycle. e.g. ((ServletWebRequest) getRequest()).getHttpServletRequest() or ((WebRequest)requestCycle.getRequest()).getHttpServletRequest() but this request already being parsed automatically in RequestCycle, before reaching servletFileUpload.parseRequest(httpServletRequest). So, Request is already been parsed... exception occur. That's why i want to use Servlet's doGet(request, response) method for getting HttpServletRequest(without parsing). If not servlets, Is there any other way to handle FileUploading (through Apache Commons API) in wicket ? Thanks... From: Peter Thomas ptrtho...@gmail.com To: users@wicket.apache.org Sent: Tuesday, September 8, 2009 11:39:58 AM Subject: Re: Usage of Servlets in Wicket, How ? Refer this: http://cwiki.apache.org/WICKET/how-to-redirect-to-an-external-non-wicket-page.html If that doesn't help you should briefly explain what your requirement is. There may be a better way to achieve it within Wicket instead of hacking around with servlets. On Tue, Sep 8, 2009 at 10:57 AM, FaRHaN farhan.ba...@ymail.com wrote: but how can we call it from our wicket web page ? From: Jeremy Thomerson jer...@wickettraining.com To: users@wicket.apache.org Sent: Tuesday, September 8, 2009 11:10:49 AM Subject: Re: Usage of Servlets in Wicket, How ? servlets are totally separate from Wicket - write a servlet and add it to your web.xml. See any servlet example on the web (non-Wicket related) for assistance. -- Jeremy Thomerson http://www.wickettraining.com On Mon, Sep 7, 2009 at 11:54 PM, FaRHaN farhan.ba...@ymail.com wrote: Hi, Is there any example in Wicket that uses Servlets (doGet() doPost()). I mean how can we configure Servlets in our wicket application and use doGet(request, response) doPost(request, response) methods. I know web.xml configuration for Servlets but how can we use doGet() doPost() methods. Do we need wicket:ids in Servlets ? Is there any reference for such type of example ? Thanks...
Re: Usage of Servlets in Wicket, How ?
On Tue, Sep 8, 2009 at 12:33 PM, FaRHaN farhan.ba...@ymail.com wrote: I want to make it a separate API for file uploading. So that i can embed it in any of the application regardless of the framework (wicket, JSF, struts etc.). The only reason is that, we can use Apache Commons FileUpload API in any of the framework. Is there any workaround to do this ? This is very interesting. When you say embed it in any of the application regardless of the framework what do you mean ? A tag library ? Suppose you have a multipart form, that contains input fields PLUS a type=file field, to what URL will you POST it and have the input data also bound / handled ? Note that Wicket already has FileUpload built in, that too as a pure Java API so I'm trying to understand your end-goal better. From: Jeremy Thomerson jer...@wickettraining.com To: users@wicket.apache.org Sent: Tuesday, September 8, 2009 12:44:08 PM Subject: Re: Usage of Servlets in Wicket, How ? Maybe if you mention the specific reason(s) that you want to use Apache Commons FileUpload API rather than Wicket's built-in forms and file upload mechanisms, someone on the list will be able to provide you with more help. It seems that the FileUpload API is intended to help you if you have to write servlets to handle forms. But with Wicket, you don't have to do this. And if you use ACFU API, then you lose the rest of Wicket's stateful form handling. -- Jeremy Thomerson http://www.wickettraining.com On Tue, Sep 8, 2009 at 1:04 AM, FaRHaN farhan.ba...@ymail.com wrote: I want to upload files through Commons FIleUpload API. As Commons FileUpload API requires HttpServletRequest for uploading files (e.g. fileItemsList = servletFileUpload.parseRequest(httpServletRequest)). Parsing HttpServletRequest is the necessary step while uploading in Commons FileUpload. I have got httpServletRequest from RequestCycle. e.g. ((ServletWebRequest) getRequest()).getHttpServletRequest() or ((WebRequest)requestCycle.getRequest()).getHttpServletRequest() but this request already being parsed automatically in RequestCycle, before reaching servletFileUpload.parseRequest(httpServletRequest). So, Request is already been parsed... exception occur. That's why i want to use Servlet's doGet(request, response) method for getting HttpServletRequest(without parsing). If not servlets, Is there any other way to handle FileUploading (through Apache Commons API) in wicket ? Thanks... From: Peter Thomas ptrtho...@gmail.com To: users@wicket.apache.org Sent: Tuesday, September 8, 2009 11:39:58 AM Subject: Re: Usage of Servlets in Wicket, How ? Refer this: http://cwiki.apache.org/WICKET/how-to-redirect-to-an-external-non-wicket-page.html If that doesn't help you should briefly explain what your requirement is. There may be a better way to achieve it within Wicket instead of hacking around with servlets. On Tue, Sep 8, 2009 at 10:57 AM, FaRHaN farhan.ba...@ymail.com wrote: but how can we call it from our wicket web page ? From: Jeremy Thomerson jer...@wickettraining.com To: users@wicket.apache.org Sent: Tuesday, September 8, 2009 11:10:49 AM Subject: Re: Usage of Servlets in Wicket, How ? servlets are totally separate from Wicket - write a servlet and add it to your web.xml. See any servlet example on the web (non-Wicket related) for assistance. -- Jeremy Thomerson http://www.wickettraining.com On Mon, Sep 7, 2009 at 11:54 PM, FaRHaN farhan.ba...@ymail.com wrote: Hi, Is there any example in Wicket that uses Servlets (doGet() doPost()). I mean how can we configure Servlets in our wicket application and use doGet(request, response) doPost(request, response) methods. I know web.xml configuration for Servlets but how can we use doGet() doPost() methods. Do we need wicket:ids in Servlets ? Is there any reference for such type of example ? Thanks...
Re: Usage of Servlets in Wicket, How ?
O my dear, i want to make a separate utility method that will take Request and
other necessary information as a parameter. just like that:
/** Utitlity Method for FileUploading /
public static void doUpload(HttpServletRequest request, FileItem fileItem){
if (ServletFileUpload.isMultipartContent(request)){
ServletFileUpload servletFileUpload = new ServletFileUpload(new
DiskFileItemFactory());
List fileItemsList = null;
try {
fileItemsList = servletFileUpload.parseRequest(request);
} catch (FileUploadException ex) {
System.out.println( Exception while Parsing File Upload
Request + ex);
}
String optionalFileName = ;
Iterator it = fileItemsList.iterator();
while (it.hasNext()){
fileItem = (FileItem)it.next();
if (fileItem.isFormField()){
String fieldName = fileItem.getFieldName();
String fieldValue = fileItem.getString();
if (fileItem.getFieldName().equals(filename))
optionalFileName = fileItem.getString();
...
}
}
}
}
/* End */
And from Wicket Page, call this method when File uploading is required.
public void onSubmit(){
doUpload(httpServletRequest, fileItem);
}
This can happen or not ?
The Problem arises while Parsing request ...
From: Peter Thomas ptrtho...@gmail.com
To: users@wicket.apache.org
Sent: Tuesday, September 8, 2009 1:13:22 PM
Subject: Re: Usage of Servlets in Wicket, How ?
On Tue, Sep 8, 2009 at 12:33 PM, FaRHaN farhan.ba...@ymail.com wrote:
I want to make it a separate API for file uploading. So that i can embed it
in any of the application regardless of the framework (wicket, JSF, struts
etc.). The only reason is that, we can use Apache Commons FileUpload API in
any of the framework.
Is there any workaround to do this ?
This is very interesting. When you say embed it in any of the application
regardless of the framework what do you mean ? A tag library ? Suppose
you have a multipart form, that contains input fields PLUS a type=file
field, to what URL will you POST it and have the input data also bound /
handled ?
Note that Wicket already has FileUpload built in, that too as a pure Java
API so I'm trying to understand your end-goal better.
From: Jeremy Thomerson jer...@wickettraining.com
To: users@wicket.apache.org
Sent: Tuesday, September 8, 2009 12:44:08 PM
Subject: Re: Usage of Servlets in Wicket, How ?
Maybe if you mention the specific reason(s) that you want to use Apache
Commons FileUpload API rather than Wicket's built-in forms and file upload
mechanisms, someone on the list will be able to provide you with more help.
It seems that the FileUpload API is intended to help you if you have to
write servlets to handle forms. But with Wicket, you don't have to do
this. And if you use ACFU API, then you lose the rest of Wicket's stateful
form handling.
--
Jeremy Thomerson
http://www.wickettraining.com
On Tue, Sep 8, 2009 at 1:04 AM, FaRHaN farhan.ba...@ymail.com wrote:
I want to upload files through Commons FIleUpload API. As Commons
FileUpload API requires HttpServletRequest for uploading files (e.g.
fileItemsList = servletFileUpload.parseRequest(httpServletRequest)).
Parsing HttpServletRequest is the necessary step while uploading in
Commons
FileUpload.
I have got httpServletRequest from RequestCycle. e.g.
((ServletWebRequest)
getRequest()).getHttpServletRequest() or
((WebRequest)requestCycle.getRequest()).getHttpServletRequest() but this
request already being parsed automatically in RequestCycle, before
reaching
servletFileUpload.parseRequest(httpServletRequest). So, Request is
already
been parsed... exception occur.
That's why i want to use Servlet's doGet(request, response) method for
getting HttpServletRequest(without parsing).
If not servlets, Is there any other way to handle FileUploading (through
Apache Commons API) in wicket ?
Thanks...
From: Peter Thomas ptrtho...@gmail.com
To: users@wicket.apache.org
Sent: Tuesday, September 8, 2009 11:39:58 AM
Subject: Re: Usage of Servlets in Wicket, How ?
Refer this:
http://cwiki.apache.org/WICKET/how-to-redirect-to-an-external-non-wicket-page.html
If that doesn't help you should briefly explain what your requirement is.
There may be a better way to achieve it within Wicket instead of hacking
around with servlets.
On Tue, Sep 8, 2009 at 10:57 AM, FaRHaN farhan.ba...@ymail.com wrote:
but how can we call it from our wicket web
Re: Usage of Servlets in Wicket, How ?
Jeremy Thomerson wrote: servlets are totally separate from Wicket - write a servlet and add it to your web.xml. See any servlet example on the web (non-Wicket related) for assistance. I wouldn't say so, cf Igor sentence in this discussion : http://www.nabble.com/WicketFilter-td25205475.html#a25210469 : map WicketSessionFilter in front of those *servlets*, you will get both Session.get() and Session.get().getApplication(), and Application.get() ++ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
How test modal windows with wicket tester?
I have dashboard, that have modal windows for adding comments and view dashboard message. How can I get this modal window for testing with wicket tester? And how to check that modal window is opened? Denis. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: How test modal windows with wicket tester?
Hi! There is nothing special in testing modal windows. It is just a panel with a panel inside. You can use tester.assertVisible... THe only trick is if you have windowCloseCallbacks.. you need to invoke those manually using tester.executeBehavior... ** Martin 2009/9/8 Denis Kandrov dkand...@unipro.ru: I have dashboard, that have modal windows for adding comments and view dashboard message. How can I get this modal window for testing with wicket tester? And how to check that modal window is opened? Denis. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: Usage of Servlets in Wicket, How ?
I'm really not sure and can't help on the parsing request problem,
although I'm not surprised that attempting to unpack a multipart request
twice would result in problems.
One thing you could try is understand the form processing life cycle of
Wicket - so instead of using onSubmit() (because the request has been
already parsed and form fields bound) - you should try over-riding some
other method. Not sure, but maybe the process() method is a candidate.
I can't help saying that IMO what you are trying is over-complicating
things. In fact Wicket actually re-uses code from the apache commons
fileupload project, refactored into Wicket classes under:
org.apache.wicket.util.upload. Does that make sense?
On Tue, Sep 8, 2009 at 1:16 PM, FaRHaN farhan.ba...@ymail.com wrote:
O my dear, i want to make a separate utility method that will take Request
and other necessary information as a parameter. just like that:
/** Utitlity Method for FileUploading /
public static void doUpload(HttpServletRequest request, FileItem fileItem){
if (ServletFileUpload.isMultipartContent(request)){
ServletFileUpload servletFileUpload = new ServletFileUpload(new
DiskFileItemFactory());
List fileItemsList = null;
try {
fileItemsList = servletFileUpload.parseRequest(request);
} catch (FileUploadException ex) {
System.out.println( Exception while Parsing File Upload
Request + ex);
}
String optionalFileName = ;
Iterator it = fileItemsList.iterator();
while (it.hasNext()){
fileItem = (FileItem)it.next();
if (fileItem.isFormField()){
String fieldName = fileItem.getFieldName();
String fieldValue = fileItem.getString();
if (fileItem.getFieldName().equals(filename))
optionalFileName = fileItem.getString();
...
}
}
}
}
/* End */
And from Wicket Page, call this method when File uploading is required.
public void onSubmit(){
doUpload(httpServletRequest, fileItem);
}
This can happen or not ?
The Problem arises while Parsing request ...
From: Peter Thomas ptrtho...@gmail.com
To: users@wicket.apache.org
Sent: Tuesday, September 8, 2009 1:13:22 PM
Subject: Re: Usage of Servlets in Wicket, How ?
On Tue, Sep 8, 2009 at 12:33 PM, FaRHaN farhan.ba...@ymail.com wrote:
I want to make it a separate API for file uploading. So that i can embed
it
in any of the application regardless of the framework (wicket, JSF,
struts
etc.). The only reason is that, we can use Apache Commons FileUpload API
in
any of the framework.
Is there any workaround to do this ?
This is very interesting. When you say embed it in any of the application
regardless of the framework what do you mean ? A tag library ? Suppose
you have a multipart form, that contains input fields PLUS a type=file
field, to what URL will you POST it and have the input data also bound /
handled ?
Note that Wicket already has FileUpload built in, that too as a pure Java
API so I'm trying to understand your end-goal better.
From: Jeremy Thomerson jer...@wickettraining.com
To: users@wicket.apache.org
Sent: Tuesday, September 8, 2009 12:44:08 PM
Subject: Re: Usage of Servlets in Wicket, How ?
Maybe if you mention the specific reason(s) that you want to use Apache
Commons FileUpload API rather than Wicket's built-in forms and file
upload
mechanisms, someone on the list will be able to provide you with more
help.
It seems that the FileUpload API is intended to help you if you have to
write servlets to handle forms. But with Wicket, you don't have to do
this. And if you use ACFU API, then you lose the rest of Wicket's
stateful
form handling.
--
Jeremy Thomerson
http://www.wickettraining.com
On Tue, Sep 8, 2009 at 1:04 AM, FaRHaN farhan.ba...@ymail.com wrote:
I want to upload files through Commons FIleUpload API. As Commons
FileUpload API requires HttpServletRequest for uploading files (e.g.
fileItemsList = servletFileUpload.parseRequest(httpServletRequest)).
Parsing HttpServletRequest is the necessary step while uploading in
Commons
FileUpload.
I have got httpServletRequest from RequestCycle. e.g.
((ServletWebRequest)
getRequest()).getHttpServletRequest() or
((WebRequest)requestCycle.getRequest()).getHttpServletRequest() but
this
request already being parsed automatically in RequestCycle, before
reaching
servletFileUpload.parseRequest(httpServletRequest). So, Request is
already
been parsed... exception occur.
That's why i want to use Servlet's doGet(request, response) method for
getting
wicket migration to 1.4.1 - getBodyContainer
Hello all,
We are currently trying to move from wicket 1.2.6 to 1.4.1 and so far
it's going well, except for one point.
In the constructor of one of our pages we use the
getBodyContainer().getBodyContainer() to add an AjaxEventBehavior for
the onload event, so we can redirect to the application if we only get
one search result on the search page. According to a colleague we did it
this way because with setResponsePage it didn't work as smoothly,
something with the page needing to be constructed first or so.
Anyway, how would we go about this now? The migration guide says we
should used renderHead, but it doesn't allow me to add any Ajax stuff
from what I can see.
Below is a part of the code:
getBodyContainer().getBodyContainer().add(new
AjaxEventBehavior(onload)
{
protected void onEvent(AjaxRequestTarget target)
{
// open worksheet if there is only one result
and autoforward is enabled.
if (results.size() == 1 autoForward)
{
SearchViewRow document = results.get(0);
preOpenWorksheet(document, target);
}
}
protected IAjaxCallDecorator getAjaxCallDecorator()
{
return new
NotificationDecorator(ResourceBundle.getTranslation(language,
ResourceBundle.DEF_ASPECT, LabelTypes.SEARCH_LOADING));
}
});
Hope you guys can help me out here, thanks in advance in any case.
Met vriendelijke groet,
Arjan Zwaan
F I N A N F i n a n c i a l A n a l y s i s
Koggelaan 5-D
8017 JH Zwolle
( Tel. : +31 88 77 88 990
7 E-mail: a.zw...@finan.nl mailto:a.zw...@finan.nl
: Internet: www.finan.nl http://www.finan.nl/
(Findesk BV) KvK nr. 29039392
Re: Mount different page for second parameter
I think right now the only way is to use MixedParamUrlCodingStrategy
Mount a page this way:
mount(new MixedParamUrlCodingStrategy(collection, CollectionPage.class, new
String[] { owner }));
so CollectionPage is mounted at: http://localhost:9090/collection/
now in CollectionPage.java you can call:
parameters.getString(owner)
to get the first parameters that in case URL is
http://localhost:9090/artivio/collection/ildella returns ildella.
As long as MixedParamUrlCodingStrategy accept a String[] comma
separated, you can have as many parameters as you want, without having
the name of the parameters in the URL.
Btw, would be cool to have a mount mechanism that allows to create
REST url in a more intuitive way, as Igor says maybe in 1.5 :)
On Mon, Sep 7, 2009 at 8:27 PM, Vit Rozkovecrozkovec...@email.cz wrote:
Hallo,
which encoding strategy should one use if one would like to achieve this:
http://somesite/somepath/user1/products -- mounted on ProductsPage.class
http://somesite/somepath/user1/profile -- mounted on ProfilePage.class
http://somesite/somepath/user2/products -- mounted on ProductsPage.class
http://somesite/somepath/user2/profile -- mounted on ProfilePage.class
on ProductsPage.class and ProfilePage.class you know which user acesses the
page.
Thank you for any hints.
Vit
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
--
Daniele Dellafiore
http://blog.ildella.net
http://twitter.com/ildella
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Attaching a wicket generated page in a multipart MIME message
Hi. I need to sent something like an HTML newsletter and I am wondering about a nice way to do this with wicket. The problem is that I need to generated the rendered page without sending it to the browser, but keep the page server side, get the generated HTML as String and include it in a multipart mime message. Any suggestion? Thanks! -- Daniele Dellafiore http://blog.ildella.net http://twitter.com/ildella - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: Attaching a wicket generated page in a multipart MIME message
search nabble for email wicket page - or something similar. you should be able to find a thread that answers your question. There have been quite a few about dumping a Wicket page to a stream or string to email. http://www.nabble.com/Generating-email-body-with-wicket-td14042459.html#a14042459 http://www.danwalmsley.com/2008/10/23/sending-html-email-with-wicket-part-ii-converting-links/ http://www.danwalmsley.com/2008/10/21/render-a-wicket-page-to-a-string-for-html-email/ ** Martin 2009/9/8 Daniele Dellafiore ilde...@gmail.com: Hi. I need to sent something like an HTML newsletter and I am wondering about a nice way to do this with wicket. The problem is that I need to generated the rendered page without sending it to the browser, but keep the page server side, get the generated HTML as String and include it in a multipart mime message. Any suggestion? Thanks! -- Daniele Dellafiore http://blog.ildella.net http://twitter.com/ildella - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: wicket migration to 1.4.1 - getBodyContainer
You could use setResponsePage(Foo.class, PageParameters)
Martijn
On Tue, Sep 8, 2009 at 12:18 PM, A. Zwaana.zw...@finan.nl wrote:
Hello all,
We are currently trying to move from wicket 1.2.6 to 1.4.1 and so far
it's going well, except for one point.
In the constructor of one of our pages we use the
getBodyContainer().getBodyContainer() to add an AjaxEventBehavior for
the onload event, so we can redirect to the application if we only get
one search result on the search page. According to a colleague we did it
this way because with setResponsePage it didn't work as smoothly,
something with the page needing to be constructed first or so.
Anyway, how would we go about this now? The migration guide says we
should used renderHead, but it doesn't allow me to add any Ajax stuff
from what I can see.
Below is a part of the code:
getBodyContainer().getBodyContainer().add(new
AjaxEventBehavior(onload)
{
protected void onEvent(AjaxRequestTarget target)
{
// open worksheet if there is only one result
and autoforward is enabled.
if (results.size() == 1 autoForward)
{
SearchViewRow document = results.get(0);
preOpenWorksheet(document, target);
}
}
protected IAjaxCallDecorator getAjaxCallDecorator()
{
return new
NotificationDecorator(ResourceBundle.getTranslation(language,
ResourceBundle.DEF_ASPECT, LabelTypes.SEARCH_LOADING));
}
});
Hope you guys can help me out here, thanks in advance in any case.
Met vriendelijke groet,
Arjan Zwaan
F I N A N F i n a n c i a l A n a l y s i s
Koggelaan 5-D
8017 JH Zwolle
( Tel. : +31 88 77 88 990
7 E-mail: a.zw...@finan.nl mailto:a.zw...@finan.nl
: Internet: www.finan.nl http://www.finan.nl/
(Findesk BV) KvK nr. 29039392
--
Become a Wicket expert, learn from the best: http://wicketinaction.com
Apache Wicket 1.4 increases type safety for web applications
Get it now: http://www.apache.org/dyn/closer.cgi/wicket/1.4.0
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: wicket migration to 1.4.1 - getBodyContainer
Or throw new RestartResponseException when you determine that you want
to render a different page instead of using ajax.
Martijn
On Tue, Sep 8, 2009 at 12:18 PM, A. Zwaana.zw...@finan.nl wrote:
Hello all,
We are currently trying to move from wicket 1.2.6 to 1.4.1 and so far
it's going well, except for one point.
In the constructor of one of our pages we use the
getBodyContainer().getBodyContainer() to add an AjaxEventBehavior for
the onload event, so we can redirect to the application if we only get
one search result on the search page. According to a colleague we did it
this way because with setResponsePage it didn't work as smoothly,
something with the page needing to be constructed first or so.
Anyway, how would we go about this now? The migration guide says we
should used renderHead, but it doesn't allow me to add any Ajax stuff
from what I can see.
Below is a part of the code:
getBodyContainer().getBodyContainer().add(new
AjaxEventBehavior(onload)
{
protected void onEvent(AjaxRequestTarget target)
{
// open worksheet if there is only one result
and autoforward is enabled.
if (results.size() == 1 autoForward)
{
SearchViewRow document = results.get(0);
preOpenWorksheet(document, target);
}
}
protected IAjaxCallDecorator getAjaxCallDecorator()
{
return new
NotificationDecorator(ResourceBundle.getTranslation(language,
ResourceBundle.DEF_ASPECT, LabelTypes.SEARCH_LOADING));
}
});
Hope you guys can help me out here, thanks in advance in any case.
Met vriendelijke groet,
Arjan Zwaan
F I N A N F i n a n c i a l A n a l y s i s
Koggelaan 5-D
8017 JH Zwolle
( Tel. : +31 88 77 88 990
7 E-mail: a.zw...@finan.nl mailto:a.zw...@finan.nl
: Internet: www.finan.nl http://www.finan.nl/
(Findesk BV) KvK nr. 29039392
--
Become a Wicket expert, learn from the best: http://wicketinaction.com
Apache Wicket 1.4 increases type safety for web applications
Get it now: http://www.apache.org/dyn/closer.cgi/wicket/1.4.0
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
RE: wicket migration to 1.4.1 - getBodyContainer
Apparently we need to be able to show a ModalWindow in some cases, which in
turn needs an AjaxRequestTarget, so I somehow need that Ajax event triggered
somewhere when the page is being rendered.
Wouldn't adding a wicket:id to the body element and then adding the
AjaxEventBehavior to it give me the same result? Or is there something tricky
when using the onload event of the body?
-Original Message-
From: Martijn Dashorst [mailto:martijn.dasho...@gmail.com]
Sent: dinsdag 8 september 2009 13:24
To: users@wicket.apache.org
Subject: Re: wicket migration to 1.4.1 - getBodyContainer
You could use setResponsePage(Foo.class, PageParameters)
Martijn
On Tue, Sep 8, 2009 at 12:18 PM, A. Zwaana.zw...@finan.nl wrote:
Hello all,
We are currently trying to move from wicket 1.2.6 to 1.4.1 and so far
it's going well, except for one point.
In the constructor of one of our pages we use the
getBodyContainer().getBodyContainer() to add an AjaxEventBehavior for
the onload event, so we can redirect to the application if we only get
one search result on the search page. According to a colleague we did it
this way because with setResponsePage it didn't work as smoothly,
something with the page needing to be constructed first or so.
Anyway, how would we go about this now? The migration guide says we
should used renderHead, but it doesn't allow me to add any Ajax stuff
from what I can see.
Below is a part of the code:
getBodyContainer().getBodyContainer().add(new
AjaxEventBehavior(onload)
{
protected void onEvent(AjaxRequestTarget target)
{
// open worksheet if there is only one result
and autoforward is enabled.
if (results.size() == 1 autoForward)
{
SearchViewRow document = results.get(0);
preOpenWorksheet(document, target);
}
}
protected IAjaxCallDecorator getAjaxCallDecorator()
{
return new
NotificationDecorator(ResourceBundle.getTranslation(language,
ResourceBundle.DEF_ASPECT, LabelTypes.SEARCH_LOADING));
}
});
Hope you guys can help me out here, thanks in advance in any case.
Met vriendelijke groet,
Arjan Zwaan
F I N A N F i n a n c i a l A n a l y s i s
Koggelaan 5-D
8017 JH Zwolle
( Tel. : +31 88 77 88 990
7 E-mail: a.zw...@finan.nl mailto:a.zw...@finan.nl
: Internet: www.finan.nl http://www.finan.nl/
(Findesk BV) KvK nr. 29039392
--
Become a Wicket expert, learn from the best: http://wicketinaction.com
Apache Wicket 1.4 increases type safety for web applications
Get it now: http://www.apache.org/dyn/closer.cgi/wicket/1.4.0
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
RE: Passing parameters from markup to panels
eg you can use IComponentResolver and create a factory panel that can create a child based on the attributes of a tag, etc. -igor Well it worked well to a point. That point was when I tried to place two panels of the same type but with different attributes on the same page. The second panel simply uses the first it seems, pulling it from the cache based on it's wicket:id value. Because a separate instance of the panel is not created the attributes set on the second panel are never read - it is presented as a clone of the first, including the affect any of its visual attributes had. There are only 10 types of people in the world: Those who understand binary, and those who don't. -Original Message- On Mon, Sep 7, 2009 at 5:23 PM, Chris Colmanchr...@stepaheadsoftware.com wrote: you say it is laughable to require knowledge of code to configure this. i agree, but i also think its laughable to require the knowledge of markup, why shouldnt a sysadmin be able to change this? so isnt a property file, or a jndi property, or a database table a better place to configure this? -igor Property files, jndi properties and database tables are all in the programmer's domain yet control over the 'size' of something, which is what this essentially is, has always and should remain, IMHO, in the domain of the graphic art department - heck, we all know they are experts at making the eye candy. The whole object oriented component architecture on which wicket is built is all about building web pages from components to make it easy to create something that works but it also visually appealing. There's a lot of experimentation by graphic designers with dimensions, colors, shapes, forms etc., and they're used to being able to quickly and easily try different elements and adjust their size fairly easily. A natural extension to this would be that panels that merely contain a variable number of items (eg., songs or news items or interesting links) should be able to be 'sized' by specifying an item count in the markup that includes them - not via 'remote control' in a configuration file or database or something else that is in the domain of the programmer. I don't want me or other programmers to have to recompile a Java file or set up a value in the database each time they want to change the number of items appearing in a particular panel - especially when that same panel can be used differently in multiple markups. The decision as to how many items appear in a panel that is merely a container of items is a purely visual one - nothing to do with business rules, logic or coding. It should therefore be up to a visually oriented person's point of view - not a programmer's point of view (as a programmer I am therefore visually challenged ;) ). If anything it could be argued that the migration of the control of such a 'visual consideration' out of the model/controller (panel java class) and into the presentation layer (markup) is in fact move *towards* MVC rather than away from it. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org No virus found in this incoming message. Checked by AVG - www.avg.com Version: 8.5.409 / Virus Database: 270.13.82/2351 - Release Date: 09/07/09 18:03:00 - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: StackOverFlow (Start.java) Jetty
Hello Martin, thanks for the reply. Sorry about the last post. I have become leary of posting code as the inhouse lawyers have admonished me for this practice. I realized albeit Panels or WebPage Wicket won't render a different class from another class without some type of event such as a link. I solved the problem by usurping the methods needed in the target class and putting the target method code into the Parent class that renders the menu. My fear was with this approach I would be forced to decompose all of my classes that are in the same directory. As it turned out this was not the case. I just saw an email response posted by Igor where mounted classes can pair up to URLS (http://somehost/somepath/someclass) which would have easily solved my problem but unfortunately this won't become available until 1.5. Thanks again, David. - Original Message - From: Martin Makundi martin.maku...@koodaripalvelut.com To: users@wicket.apache.org Sent: Monday, September 7, 2009 11:41:14 PM GMT -06:00 US/Canada Central Subject: Re: StackOverFlow (Start.java) Jetty Hi! I did not understand a single word of what you just said :( I have never had problems with panels.. would you mind posting some code so we can see what you are trying to accomplish and how? ** Martin 2009/9/8 David Brown dbr...@sexingtechnologies.com: Hello Martin, converting the WebPage to Panel foments no complaints until RunTime where all of the upstream markup is re-included in the downstream onClick() request. the usual complains are made: cannot find the component to the paired wicket markup. The component has already been fired by this point in the navigation process. I tried to add instances of the classes that are being complained about but this is completely ignored by the rendering. I suppose I have too many downstream children hanging off of the original MainMenu class that is now the target of all the complaints about no component matching the markup. Is there a way to accumulate components and re-use them when needed to keep the hierarchy happy? Regards, David. - Original Message - From: Martin Makundi martin.maku...@koodaripalvelut.com To: users@wicket.apache.org Sent: Monday, September 7, 2009 12:03:39 PM GMT -06:00 US/Canada Central Subject: Re: StackOverFlow (Start.java) Jetty If you have any suggestions for how to replace just part of a WebPage (wicket:extend) with a whole new WebPage please advise. Regards, David. Why not use panels? Looks like what you need is panels. ** Martin - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: Using java.util.Date class with CompoundPropertyModel
Thanks Igor! You pointed me in the right direction, as usual. -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Using-java.util.Date-class-with-CompoundPropertyModel-tp25338777p25346526.html Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: Help on wizard solution...
I think the comments on this article by Igor may give you some ideas (see #14) http://wicketinaction.com/2008/09/building-a-smart-entitymodel/ So having a single page, and swapping out multiple panels for each question may be the solution. You can write logic for the previous and next buttons (or links) to swap in the right panel. On Tue, Sep 8, 2009 at 7:50 PM, Muro Copenhagen copenha...@gmail.comwrote: Hi, I could use some input on how to solve a problem i have. In my web-app i have some cases, and each cases have several questions. And i want the user to flow between the pages in a wizard manner like the example in: http://www.wicket-library.com/wicket-examples/wizard/ The only problem i have is that all the questions are database driven, and is not a fixed set of pages. But the wizard example is in the link is fixed. How would i make a dynamic database driven wizard, where the content of the wizard pages are database driven? Or is the wizard approach not the right way of doing it...? What i want to achieve is a user browsing through several question in case, with the option of moving backwards between the question. Any input from anyone ...? Best Regards Muro
Re: Help on wizard solution...
I think the wizard is the correct approach... You can try use
DynamicWizardModel on your wizard.
javadoc:
* Wizard model that is specialized on dynamic wizards. Unlike the default,
static
* {...@link WizardModel wizard model}, this model isn't very intelligent, but
rather delegates much
* of the work and knowledge to the {...@link IDynamicWizardStep dynamic wizard
steps} it uses.
on IDynamicWizardStep you can implement the ordering and navegation rules
based on database and page params.
On Tue, Sep 8, 2009 at 11:20 AM, Muro Copenhagen copenha...@gmail.comwrote:
Hi,
I could use some input on how to solve a problem i have.
In my web-app i have some cases, and each cases have several questions.
And i want the user to flow between the pages in a wizard manner like the
example in:
http://www.wicket-library.com/wicket-examples/wizard/
The only problem i have is that all the questions are database driven, and
is not a fixed set of pages.
But the wizard example is in the link is fixed.
How would i make a dynamic database driven wizard, where the content of the
wizard pages are database driven?
Or is the wizard approach not the right way of doing it...?
What i want to achieve is a user browsing through several question in case,
with the option of moving backwards between the question.
Any input from anyone ...?
Best Regards
Muro
Re: Help on wizard solution...
Thanks Pedro and Peter,
I'll try the DynamicWizardModel, it seems as the right choice.
But a quick google search didn't provide any example, so i must try making
it work.
Hopefully it will...
Best Regards
Muro
On Tue, Sep 8, 2009 at 4:35 PM, Pedro Santos pedros...@gmail.com wrote:
I think the wizard is the correct approach... You can try use
DynamicWizardModel on your wizard.
javadoc:
* Wizard model that is specialized on dynamic wizards. Unlike the default,
static
* {...@link WizardModel wizard model}, this model isn't very intelligent, but
rather delegates much
* of the work and knowledge to the {...@link IDynamicWizardStep dynamic
wizard
steps} it uses.
on IDynamicWizardStep you can implement the ordering and navegation rules
based on database and page params.
On Tue, Sep 8, 2009 at 11:20 AM, Muro Copenhagen copenha...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi,
I could use some input on how to solve a problem i have.
In my web-app i have some cases, and each cases have several questions.
And i want the user to flow between the pages in a wizard manner like the
example in:
http://www.wicket-library.com/wicket-examples/wizard/
The only problem i have is that all the questions are database driven,
and
is not a fixed set of pages.
But the wizard example is in the link is fixed.
How would i make a dynamic database driven wizard, where the content of
the
wizard pages are database driven?
Or is the wizard approach not the right way of doing it...?
What i want to achieve is a user browsing through several question in
case,
with the option of moving backwards between the question.
Any input from anyone ...?
Best Regards
Muro
Re: Passing parameters from markup to panels
each panel has to have a different wicket:id and the id should not exist in component hierarchy yet. component resolvers are only used if wicket cannot match wicket id to an object in the component hierarchy. -igor On Tue, Sep 8, 2009 at 5:51 AM, Chris Colmanchr...@stepaheadsoftware.com wrote: eg you can use IComponentResolver and create a factory panel that can create a child based on the attributes of a tag, etc. -igor Well it worked well to a point. That point was when I tried to place two panels of the same type but with different attributes on the same page. The second panel simply uses the first it seems, pulling it from the cache based on it's wicket:id value. Because a separate instance of the panel is not created the attributes set on the second panel are never read - it is presented as a clone of the first, including the affect any of its visual attributes had. There are only 10 types of people in the world: Those who understand binary, and those who don't. -Original Message- On Mon, Sep 7, 2009 at 5:23 PM, Chris Colmanchr...@stepaheadsoftware.com wrote: you say it is laughable to require knowledge of code to configure this. i agree, but i also think its laughable to require the knowledge of markup, why shouldnt a sysadmin be able to change this? so isnt a property file, or a jndi property, or a database table a better place to configure this? -igor Property files, jndi properties and database tables are all in the programmer's domain yet control over the 'size' of something, which is what this essentially is, has always and should remain, IMHO, in the domain of the graphic art department - heck, we all know they are experts at making the eye candy. The whole object oriented component architecture on which wicket is built is all about building web pages from components to make it easy to create something that works but it also visually appealing. There's a lot of experimentation by graphic designers with dimensions, colors, shapes, forms etc., and they're used to being able to quickly and easily try different elements and adjust their size fairly easily. A natural extension to this would be that panels that merely contain a variable number of items (eg., songs or news items or interesting links) should be able to be 'sized' by specifying an item count in the markup that includes them - not via 'remote control' in a configuration file or database or something else that is in the domain of the programmer. I don't want me or other programmers to have to recompile a Java file or set up a value in the database each time they want to change the number of items appearing in a particular panel - especially when that same panel can be used differently in multiple markups. The decision as to how many items appear in a panel that is merely a container of items is a purely visual one - nothing to do with business rules, logic or coding. It should therefore be up to a visually oriented person's point of view - not a programmer's point of view (as a programmer I am therefore visually challenged ;) ). If anything it could be argued that the migration of the control of such a 'visual consideration' out of the model/controller (panel java class) and into the presentation layer (markup) is in fact move *towards* MVC rather than away from it. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org No virus found in this incoming message. Checked by AVG - www.avg.com Version: 8.5.409 / Virus Database: 270.13.82/2351 - Release Date: 09/07/09 18:03:00 - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: wicket migration to 1.4.1 - getBodyContainer
See IHeaderResponse.renderOnDomReadyJavascript()
Martijn
On Tue, Sep 8, 2009 at 2:42 PM, A. Zwaana.zw...@finan.nl wrote:
Apparently we need to be able to show a ModalWindow in some cases, which in
turn needs an AjaxRequestTarget, so I somehow need that Ajax event triggered
somewhere when the page is being rendered.
Wouldn't adding a wicket:id to the body element and then adding the
AjaxEventBehavior to it give me the same result? Or is there something tricky
when using the onload event of the body?
-Original Message-
From: Martijn Dashorst [mailto:martijn.dasho...@gmail.com]
Sent: dinsdag 8 september 2009 13:24
To: users@wicket.apache.org
Subject: Re: wicket migration to 1.4.1 - getBodyContainer
You could use setResponsePage(Foo.class, PageParameters)
Martijn
On Tue, Sep 8, 2009 at 12:18 PM, A. Zwaana.zw...@finan.nl wrote:
Hello all,
We are currently trying to move from wicket 1.2.6 to 1.4.1 and so far
it's going well, except for one point.
In the constructor of one of our pages we use the
getBodyContainer().getBodyContainer() to add an AjaxEventBehavior for
the onload event, so we can redirect to the application if we only get
one search result on the search page. According to a colleague we did it
this way because with setResponsePage it didn't work as smoothly,
something with the page needing to be constructed first or so.
Anyway, how would we go about this now? The migration guide says we
should used renderHead, but it doesn't allow me to add any Ajax stuff
from what I can see.
Below is a part of the code:
getBodyContainer().getBodyContainer().add(new
AjaxEventBehavior(onload)
{
protected void onEvent(AjaxRequestTarget target)
{
// open worksheet if there is only one result
and autoforward is enabled.
if (results.size() == 1 autoForward)
{
SearchViewRow document = results.get(0);
preOpenWorksheet(document, target);
}
}
protected IAjaxCallDecorator getAjaxCallDecorator()
{
return new
NotificationDecorator(ResourceBundle.getTranslation(language,
ResourceBundle.DEF_ASPECT, LabelTypes.SEARCH_LOADING));
}
});
Hope you guys can help me out here, thanks in advance in any case.
Met vriendelijke groet,
Arjan Zwaan
F I N A N F i n a n c i a l A n a l y s i s
Koggelaan 5-D
8017 JH Zwolle
( Tel. : +31 88 77 88 990
7 E-mail: a.zw...@finan.nl mailto:a.zw...@finan.nl
: Internet: www.finan.nl http://www.finan.nl/
(Findesk BV) KvK nr. 29039392
--
Become a Wicket expert, learn from the best: http://wicketinaction.com
Apache Wicket 1.4 increases type safety for web applications
Get it now: http://www.apache.org/dyn/closer.cgi/wicket/1.4.0
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
--
Become a Wicket expert, learn from the best: http://wicketinaction.com
Apache Wicket 1.4 increases type safety for web applications
Get it now: http://www.apache.org/dyn/closer.cgi/wicket/1.4.0
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
ajax indicator for all ajax requests blocking page
I am looking for some indicator for any ajax requests , I dont want to add the behaviour for every component with ajax behaviour , I want something which detects for ajax request and starts the indicator blocking the page for further user actions and vanishess after response is rendered is there any?
Re: ajax indicator for all ajax requests blocking page
http://www.google.com/search?q=wicket+ajax+indicator -- Jeremy Thomerson http://www.wickettraining.com On Tue, Sep 8, 2009 at 10:13 AM, tubin gen fachh...@gmail.com wrote: I am looking for some indicator for any ajax requests , I dont want to add the behaviour for every component with ajax behaviour , I want something which detects for ajax request and starts the indicator blocking the page for further user actions and vanishess after response is rendered is there any?
Re: ajax indicator for all ajax requests blocking page
I did this in pure Javascript for a recent project. You can insert
this code into your base page or whatnot. Its basically a hidden div
that you hide/show and you can style it however. You can see it in
action at http://www.pnc.net/. In my case its just a quick
'Loading...' text blurb in the top right of the window. I stole this
from
:http://cwiki.apache.org/WICKET/generic-busy-indicator-for-both-ajax-and-non-ajax-submits.html
html:
---
div id=bysy_indicatorLoading .../div
js:
---
script type=text/javascript
window.onload = setupFunc;
function setupFunc() {
document.getElementsByTagName('body')[0].onclick = clickFunc;
hideBusysign();
Wicket.Ajax.registerPreCallHandler(showBusysign);
Wicket.Ajax.registerPostCallHandler(hideBusysign);
Wicket.Ajax.registerFailureHandler(hideBusysign);
}
function hideBusysign() {
document.getElementById('bysy_indicator').style.display ='none';
}
function showBusysign() {
document.getElementById('bysy_indicator').style.display ='inline';
}
function clickFunc(eventData) {
var clickedElement = (window.event) ? event.srcElement : eventData.target;
if (clickedElement.tagName.toUpperCase() == 'BUTTON' ||
clickedElement.tagName.toUpperCase() == 'A' ||
clickedElement.parentNode.tagName.toUpperCase() == 'A'
|| (clickedElement.tagName.toUpperCase() == 'INPUT'
(clickedElement.type.toUpperCase() == 'BUTTON' ||
clickedElement.type.toUpperCase() == 'SUBMIT'))) {
showBusysign();
}
}
/script
On Tue, Sep 8, 2009 at 8:13 AM, tubin genfachh...@gmail.com wrote:
I am looking for some indicator for any ajax requests , I dont want to add
the behaviour for every component with ajax behaviour , I want something
which detects for ajax request and starts the indicator blocking the page
for further user actions and vanishess after response is rendered is there
any?
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: Help on wizard solution...
I had some experience with what you need so i hope I could help you if you
need something.
I implemented the dynamic wizard and it was actually lots of fun :)
Eyal Golan
egola...@gmail.com
Visit: http://jvdrums.sourceforge.net/
LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/egolan74
P Save a tree. Please don't print this e-mail unless it's really necessary
On Tue, Sep 8, 2009 at 5:51 PM, Muro Copenhagen copenha...@gmail.comwrote:
Thanks Pedro and Peter,
I'll try the DynamicWizardModel, it seems as the right choice.
But a quick google search didn't provide any example, so i must try making
it work.
Hopefully it will...
Best Regards
Muro
On Tue, Sep 8, 2009 at 4:35 PM, Pedro Santos pedros...@gmail.com wrote:
I think the wizard is the correct approach... You can try use
DynamicWizardModel on your wizard.
javadoc:
* Wizard model that is specialized on dynamic wizards. Unlike the
default,
static
* {...@link WizardModel wizard model}, this model isn't very intelligent,
but
rather delegates much
* of the work and knowledge to the {...@link IDynamicWizardStep dynamic
wizard
steps} it uses.
on IDynamicWizardStep you can implement the ordering and navegation rules
based on database and page params.
On Tue, Sep 8, 2009 at 11:20 AM, Muro Copenhagen copenha...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi,
I could use some input on how to solve a problem i have.
In my web-app i have some cases, and each cases have several questions.
And i want the user to flow between the pages in a wizard manner like
the
example in:
http://www.wicket-library.com/wicket-examples/wizard/
The only problem i have is that all the questions are database driven,
and
is not a fixed set of pages.
But the wizard example is in the link is fixed.
How would i make a dynamic database driven wizard, where the content of
the
wizard pages are database driven?
Or is the wizard approach not the right way of doing it...?
What i want to achieve is a user browsing through several question in
case,
with the option of moving backwards between the question.
Any input from anyone ...?
Best Regards
Muro
Re: Help on wizard solution...
I've done this in both DynamicWizards as well as regular wizards and
can pass some code along if you need it.
My rule of thumb is If you can gather all of the content together for
your wizard use a regular wizard (eg: non-dependent configuration
directives), if future wizard steps can change based on a specific
wizard step then use a DynamicWizard (eg: If you pick A on Step 5 then
Step 6 shows D, otherwise Step 6 shows F
I have found that controlling backwards and forwards navigation in a
dynamic wizard very difficult since you are responsible for all of the
logic.
John-
On Tue, Sep 8, 2009 at 8:30 AM, Eyal Golanegola...@gmail.com wrote:
I had some experience with what you need so i hope I could help you if you
need something.
I implemented the dynamic wizard and it was actually lots of fun :)
Eyal Golan
egola...@gmail.com
Visit: http://jvdrums.sourceforge.net/
LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/egolan74
P Save a tree. Please don't print this e-mail unless it's really necessary
On Tue, Sep 8, 2009 at 5:51 PM, Muro Copenhagen copenha...@gmail.comwrote:
Thanks Pedro and Peter,
I'll try the DynamicWizardModel, it seems as the right choice.
But a quick google search didn't provide any example, so i must try making
it work.
Hopefully it will...
Best Regards
Muro
On Tue, Sep 8, 2009 at 4:35 PM, Pedro Santos pedros...@gmail.com wrote:
I think the wizard is the correct approach... You can try use
DynamicWizardModel on your wizard.
javadoc:
* Wizard model that is specialized on dynamic wizards. Unlike the
default,
static
* {...@link WizardModel wizard model}, this model isn't very intelligent,
but
rather delegates much
* of the work and knowledge to the {...@link IDynamicWizardStep dynamic
wizard
steps} it uses.
on IDynamicWizardStep you can implement the ordering and navegation rules
based on database and page params.
On Tue, Sep 8, 2009 at 11:20 AM, Muro Copenhagen copenha...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi,
I could use some input on how to solve a problem i have.
In my web-app i have some cases, and each cases have several questions.
And i want the user to flow between the pages in a wizard manner like
the
example in:
http://www.wicket-library.com/wicket-examples/wizard/
The only problem i have is that all the questions are database driven,
and
is not a fixed set of pages.
But the wizard example is in the link is fixed.
How would i make a dynamic database driven wizard, where the content of
the
wizard pages are database driven?
Or is the wizard approach not the right way of doing it...?
What i want to achieve is a user browsing through several question in
case,
with the option of moving backwards between the question.
Any input from anyone ...?
Best Regards
Muro
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: ajax indicator for all ajax requests blocking page
I also want to mask page along with loading indication is there anything
available ?
John Armstrong-3 wrote:
I did this in pure Javascript for a recent project. You can insert
this code into your base page or whatnot. Its basically a hidden div
that you hide/show and you can style it however. You can see it in
action at http://www.pnc.net/. In my case its just a quick
'Loading...' text blurb in the top right of the window. I stole this
from
:http://cwiki.apache.org/WICKET/generic-busy-indicator-for-both-ajax-and-non-ajax-submits.html
html:
---
div id=bysy_indicatorLoading .../div
js:
---
script type=text/javascript
window.onload = setupFunc;
function setupFunc() {
document.getElementsByTagName('body')[0].onclick = clickFunc;
hideBusysign();
Wicket.Ajax.registerPreCallHandler(showBusysign);
Wicket.Ajax.registerPostCallHandler(hideBusysign);
Wicket.Ajax.registerFailureHandler(hideBusysign);
}
function hideBusysign() {
document.getElementById('bysy_indicator').style.display ='none';
}
function showBusysign() {
document.getElementById('bysy_indicator').style.display ='inline';
}
function clickFunc(eventData) {
var clickedElement = (window.event) ? event.srcElement :
eventData.target;
if (clickedElement.tagName.toUpperCase() == 'BUTTON' ||
clickedElement.tagName.toUpperCase() == 'A' ||
clickedElement.parentNode.tagName.toUpperCase() == 'A'
|| (clickedElement.tagName.toUpperCase() == 'INPUT'
(clickedElement.type.toUpperCase() == 'BUTTON' ||
clickedElement.type.toUpperCase() == 'SUBMIT'))) {
showBusysign();
}
}
/script
On Tue, Sep 8, 2009 at 8:13 AM, tubin genfachh...@gmail.com wrote:
I am looking for some indicator for any ajax requests , I dont want to
add
the behaviour for every component with ajax behaviour , I want something
which detects for ajax request and starts the indicator blocking the page
for further user actions and vanishess after response is rendered is
there
any?
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/ajax-indicator-for-all-ajax-requests-blocking-page-tp25348177p25349567.html
Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: ajax indicator for all ajax requests blocking page
try this js:
var mask = new Wicket.Window.Mask(false); mask.show();
the Mask is the use by ModalWindow:
http://www.wicket-library.com/wicket-examples/ajax/modal-window.2
On Tue, Sep 8, 2009 at 1:26 PM, fachhoch fachh...@gmail.com wrote:
I also want to mask page along with loading indication is there anything
available ?
John Armstrong-3 wrote:
I did this in pure Javascript for a recent project. You can insert
this code into your base page or whatnot. Its basically a hidden div
that you hide/show and you can style it however. You can see it in
action at http://www.pnc.net/. In my case its just a quick
'Loading...' text blurb in the top right of the window. I stole this
from
:
http://cwiki.apache.org/WICKET/generic-busy-indicator-for-both-ajax-and-non-ajax-submits.html
html:
---
div id=bysy_indicatorLoading .../div
js:
---
script type=text/javascript
window.onload = setupFunc;
function setupFunc() {
document.getElementsByTagName('body')[0].onclick = clickFunc;
hideBusysign();
Wicket.Ajax.registerPreCallHandler(showBusysign);
Wicket.Ajax.registerPostCallHandler(hideBusysign);
Wicket.Ajax.registerFailureHandler(hideBusysign);
}
function hideBusysign() {
document.getElementById('bysy_indicator').style.display ='none';
}
function showBusysign() {
document.getElementById('bysy_indicator').style.display ='inline';
}
function clickFunc(eventData) {
var clickedElement = (window.event) ? event.srcElement :
eventData.target;
if (clickedElement.tagName.toUpperCase() == 'BUTTON' ||
clickedElement.tagName.toUpperCase() == 'A' ||
clickedElement.parentNode.tagName.toUpperCase() == 'A'
|| (clickedElement.tagName.toUpperCase() == 'INPUT'
(clickedElement.type.toUpperCase() == 'BUTTON' ||
clickedElement.type.toUpperCase() == 'SUBMIT'))) {
showBusysign();
}
}
/script
On Tue, Sep 8, 2009 at 8:13 AM, tubin genfachh...@gmail.com wrote:
I am looking for some indicator for any ajax requests , I dont want to
add
the behaviour for every component with ajax behaviour , I want something
which detects for ajax request and starts the indicator blocking the
page
for further user actions and vanishess after response is rendered is
there
any?
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/ajax-indicator-for-all-ajax-requests-blocking-page-tp25348177p25349567.html
Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
problem with ResourceLink
Hi,
We have the following code:
static public ResourceLink getResourceLink(String id,byte[] data,final
String title,String contentType){
ResourceLink resourceLink = new ResourceLink(id, new
CustomResource(data,contentType,title)){
private static final long serialVersionUID = 1L;
@Override
protected void onComponentTagBody(MarkupStream markupStream,
ComponentTag openTag) {
replaceComponentTagBody(markupStream, openTag, title);
}
};
//resourceLink.add(new Label(title,new Model(title)));
return resourceLink;
}
and CustomResource is:
public class CustomResource extends Resource{
String filename = ;
ByteArrayResource byteArrayResource = null;
public CustomResource (byte[] data,String contentType,String
filename){
byteArrayResource = new
ByteArrayResource(contentType,data,filename);
this.filename = filename;
}
public IResourceStream getResourceStream() {
return byteArrayResource.getResourceStream();
//return getFile();
//return getAttachment();
}
}
when the user presses a link of a file named: myFile.doc a save dialog is
opened and the file name is ui.doc
I looked into the code and found that in Resource#onResourceRequested
there's the line: cycle.setRequestTarget(new
ResourceStreamRequestTarget(resourceStream));
When I debugged and changed the value of fileName in
ResourceStreamRequestTarget to bla.doc I got the bla.doc in the save dialog.
We use Wicket 1.3.6
How can I call the constructor of ResourceStreamRequestTarget with the file
name?
Another question,
Is there a way to get the content type out of the file without hard coding?
now we have this:
private String getContentType(String fileName){
fileName = fileName.toLowerCase();
String contentType = null;
if (fileName.endsWith(.doc)) {
contentType = application/msword;
} else if (fileName.endsWith(.html)
|| fileName.endsWith(.txt)
|| fileName.endsWith(.log)
|| fileName.endsWith(.properties))
{
contentType = text/html;
} else if (fileName.endsWith(.pdf)) {
contentType = application/pdf;
} else if (fileName.endsWith(.xls)) {
contentType = application/vnd.ms-excel;
} else if (fileName.endsWith(.pot)
|| fileName.endsWith(.pps)
|| fileName.endsWith(.ppt)) {
contentType = application/vnd.ms-powerpoint;
} else if (fileName.endsWith(.zip)) {
contentType = application/x-zip-compressed;
} else if (fileName.endsWith(.jpg)) {
contentType = image/jpeg;
} else if (fileName.endsWith(.png)) {
contentType = image/png;
} else if (fileName.endsWith(.gif)) {
contentType = image/gif;
} else if (fileName.endsWith(.mp3)) {
contentType = audio/mpeg;
} else if (fileName.endsWith(.bmp)) {
contentType = image/bmp;
} else {
//try {
//contentType
=text/+fileName.substring(fileName.lastIndexOf(.)+1);
//} catch (Exception e) {
//}
}
return contentType;
}
BTW,
I've noticed that there's DownloadLink. Should we use this?
Thanks
Eyal Golan
egola...@gmail.com
Visit: http://jvdrums.sourceforge.net/
LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/egolan74
P Save a tree. Please don't print this e-mail unless it's really necessary
Re: Help on wizard solution...
+1 for john Eyal Golan egola...@gmail.com Visit: http://jvdrums.sourceforge.net/ LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/egolan74 P Save a tree. Please don't print this e-mail unless it's really necessary
Help on wizard solution...
Hi, I could use some input on how to solve a problem i have. In my web-app i have some cases, and each cases have several questions. And i want the user to flow between the pages in a wizard manner like the example in: http://www.wicket-library.com/wicket-examples/wizard/ The only problem i have is that all the questions are database driven, and is not a fixed set of pages. But the wizard example is in the link is fixed. How would i make a dynamic database driven wizard, where the content of the wizard pages are database driven? Or is the wizard approach not the right way of doing it...? What i want to achieve is a user browsing through several question in case, with the option of moving backwards between the question. Any input from anyone ...? Best Regards Muro
Re: ajax indicator for all ajax requests blocking page
can you tell me more about this script I am totally null with java script
should I add this var mask = new Wicket.Window.Mask(false); mask.show();
inside the showBusysign() function? and if I want to remove mask what
function should I call ?
Pedro Santos-6 wrote:
try this js:
var mask = new Wicket.Window.Mask(false); mask.show();
the Mask is the use by ModalWindow:
http://www.wicket-library.com/wicket-examples/ajax/modal-window.2
On Tue, Sep 8, 2009 at 1:26 PM, fachhoch fachh...@gmail.com wrote:
I also want to mask page along with loading indication is there
anything
available ?
John Armstrong-3 wrote:
I did this in pure Javascript for a recent project. You can insert
this code into your base page or whatnot. Its basically a hidden div
that you hide/show and you can style it however. You can see it in
action at http://www.pnc.net/. In my case its just a quick
'Loading...' text blurb in the top right of the window. I stole this
from
:
http://cwiki.apache.org/WICKET/generic-busy-indicator-for-both-ajax-and-non-ajax-submits.html
html:
---
div id=bysy_indicatorLoading .../div
js:
---
script type=text/javascript
window.onload = setupFunc;
function setupFunc() {
document.getElementsByTagName('body')[0].onclick = clickFunc;
hideBusysign();
Wicket.Ajax.registerPreCallHandler(showBusysign);
Wicket.Ajax.registerPostCallHandler(hideBusysign);
Wicket.Ajax.registerFailureHandler(hideBusysign);
}
function hideBusysign() {
document.getElementById('bysy_indicator').style.display ='none';
}
function showBusysign() {
document.getElementById('bysy_indicator').style.display ='inline';
}
function clickFunc(eventData) {
var clickedElement = (window.event) ? event.srcElement :
eventData.target;
if (clickedElement.tagName.toUpperCase() == 'BUTTON' ||
clickedElement.tagName.toUpperCase() == 'A' ||
clickedElement.parentNode.tagName.toUpperCase() == 'A'
|| (clickedElement.tagName.toUpperCase() == 'INPUT'
(clickedElement.type.toUpperCase() == 'BUTTON' ||
clickedElement.type.toUpperCase() == 'SUBMIT'))) {
showBusysign();
}
}
/script
On Tue, Sep 8, 2009 at 8:13 AM, tubin genfachh...@gmail.com wrote:
I am looking for some indicator for any ajax requests , I dont want to
add
the behaviour for every component with ajax behaviour , I want
something
which detects for ajax request and starts the indicator blocking the
page
for further user actions and vanishess after response is rendered is
there
any?
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/ajax-indicator-for-all-ajax-requests-blocking-page-tp25348177p25349567.html
Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/ajax-indicator-for-all-ajax-requests-blocking-page-tp25348177p25350647.html
Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: Can't update TextField via Ajax after a validation error
Hi Jason,
Thanks for the tip and explanation. It makes sense, and calling
testInput.clearInput() fixed the issue.
Neil
On Fri, Sep 4, 2009 at 7:20 PM, Jason Lea ja...@kumachan.net.nz wrote:
When a field is submitted and there is a validation error, it doesn't
update the model and the field will redisplay with the invalid input. This
way the user can see what they typed and can fix the problem.
With your populate link, you are updating the model, but wicket won't look
at the model because the field is redisplaying the invalid input (in your
case an empty field).
If you want to update the underlying model value and ignore the previous
failed validation you will need to clear the input.
You could use Form.clearInput() to clear all invalid fields or
testInput.clearInput() perhaps.
Neil Curzon wrote:
Thanks for the reply.
It doesn't sound like this is exactly what I want, though. I do need my
required field to be validated, always. I just don't understand why
validation works when the link that fills in the Integer behind the
property
model is clicked first, but the same link populating and updating the
field
stops working after a validation error.
On Fri, Sep 4, 2009 at 6:11 PM, Pedro Santos pedros...@gmail.com wrote:
Take a look at:
http://wicket.apache.org/docs/wicket-1.3.2/wicket/apidocs/org/apache/wicket/markup/html/form/Button.html#setDefaultFormProcessing(boolean)http://wicket.apache.org/docs/wicket-1.3.2/wicket/apidocs/org/apache/wicket/markup/html/form/Button.html#setDefaultFormProcessing%28boolean%29
http://wicket.apache.org/docs/wicket-1.3.2/wicket/apidocs/org/apache/wicket/markup/html/form/Button.html#setDefaultFormProcessing%28boolean%29
On Fri, Sep 4, 2009 at 7:01 PM, Neil Curzon neil.cur...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi all,
I'm having a weird problem that causes an input to refuse to update with
an
AjaxLink click method when there's been a validation error. One field in
the
form has a property model pointing to an Integer value. It's set to
required, and there are other links that set the Integer value.
What I see is that when I first click a link that populates the Integer
under the required field, everything works fine. But when I click submit
first, the populate links stop working. The handlers are still invoked,
but
the HTML that comes back in the Ajax Debug shows an input with value=
(even though the getModelObject() for that TextField returns the proper
value in debugging statements). This results in the input always being
showed empty. If I do things in the proper order, I see the correct
value
populate in the text field as expected. It's not just a display issue,
either. The form refuses to submit successfully at all if there was a
validation error first (and you don't manually enter anything into the
field).
Below is a simple application that reproduces the issue I'm seeing. I'm
using wicket 1.3.7 but I've tried 1.4.1 with the same result. Any help
would
be greatly appreciated.
Thanks
Neil
public class HomePage extends WebPage {
public HomePage() {
add(new TestForm(testForm));
}
class TestForm extends Form {
private Integer value;
private FeedbackPanel feedbackPanel;
private TextField testInput;
public TestForm(String id) {
super(id);
add(feedbackPanel = new FeedbackPanel(feedbackPanel));
feedbackPanel.setOutputMarkupId(true);
add(testInput = new TextField(testInput, new
PropertyModel(this, value)));
testInput.setRequired(true);
testInput.setOutputMarkupId(true);
add(new AjaxButton(submitButton){
@Override
protected void onError(AjaxRequestTarget target, Form
form)
{
target.addComponent(feedbackPanel);
}
protected void onSubmit(AjaxRequestTarget target, Form
form)
{
info(It worked!);
target.addComponent(feedbackPanel);
}
});
add(new AjaxLink(chooseOneLink){
public void onClick(AjaxRequestTarget target) {
value = 1;
target.addComponent(testInput);
target.addComponent(feedbackPanel);
}
});
}
}
}
html
body
form wicket:id=testForm
div wicket:id=feedbackPanel/
input wicket:id=testInput/
a wicket:id=chooseOneLinkChoose 1/a
button wicket:id=submitButtonSubmit/button
/form
/body
/html
--
Jason Lea
Re: Property Models
T is the type parameter for the model object ( http://static.ddpoker.com/javadoc/wicket/1.4-m1/org/apache/wicket/model/IModel.html), if you are creating an PropertyModel to retrieve and access an String property, so String is the correct type parameter for the PropertyModel... On Tue, Sep 8, 2009 at 2:13 AM, Douglas Ferguson doug...@douglasferguson.us wrote: If I have a have this: CompoundPropertyModel(Person) PropertyModel(Person, name); Would this be accurate? CompoundPropertyModelPerson PropertyModelString -assuming name is a string - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
[Training] Autumn Apache Wicket Schedule For London Amsterdam
The following dates for jWeekend's 2 day Apache Wicket training courses, jw703 [1], are now scheduled and confirmed. Course syllabus and student reviews can be found on our site. London: [2] Sep23-24(Wed-Thu), Oct8-9(Thu-Fri), Oct10-11(Sat-Sun), Nov2-3(Mon-Tue), Nov7-8(Sat-Sun), Nov26-27(Thu-Fri) Amsterdam: [3] Sep28-29, Nov30-Dec1 Contact us [4] regarding customised dates and/or content (add-on modules available from our Java, OO/UML, Spring and JPA courses) as well as on-site delivery. Regards - Cemal jWeekend OO Java Technologies, Wicket Training and Development http://jWeekend.com [1] http://jweekend.com/dev/JW703/ [2] http://jweekend.com/dev/BookingPage/ [3] http://www.jteam.nl/news/wicket.html [4] http://jweekend.com/dev/ContactUs - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: maven wicket stuff
sorry, I realize now: just set the artifactIdgmap2/artifactId line On Tue, Sep 8, 2009 at 5:53 PM, Pedro Santos pedros...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, I'm trying to add dependency to my project from wicket stuff like: dependency groupIdorg.wicketstuff/groupId artifactIdgmap2-parent/artifactId version1.4-SNAPSHOT/version /dependency but the artifact is missing... something I can do about?
Re: maven wicket stuff
I think you're going to want to use artifactIdgmap/artifactId. gmap-parent is a pom-only distribution. -- Jeremy Thomerson http://www.wickettraining.com On Tue, Sep 8, 2009 at 3:53 PM, Pedro Santos pedros...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, I'm trying to add dependency to my project from wicket stuff like: dependency groupIdorg.wicketstuff/groupId artifactIdgmap2-parent/artifactId version1.4-SNAPSHOT/version /dependency but the artifact is missing... something I can do about?
Re: maven wicket stuff
also, make sure that you added the wicketstuff repo to your pom (as described on the ws wiki somewhere) -- Jeremy Thomerson http://www.wickettraining.com On Tue, Sep 8, 2009 at 3:57 PM, Jeremy Thomerson jer...@wickettraining.comwrote: I think you're going to want to use artifactIdgmap/artifactId. gmap-parent is a pom-only distribution. -- Jeremy Thomerson http://www.wickettraining.com On Tue, Sep 8, 2009 at 3:53 PM, Pedro Santos pedros...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, I'm trying to add dependency to my project from wicket stuff like: dependency groupIdorg.wicketstuff/groupId artifactIdgmap2-parent/artifactId version1.4-SNAPSHOT/version /dependency but the artifact is missing... something I can do about?
Re: The alternative to: HeaderContributor.forCss
Hello Jeremy, thanks for the link. This works. Regards, David. - Original Message - From: Jeremy Thomerson jer...@wickettraining.com To: users@wicket.apache.org Sent: Monday, September 7, 2009 10:44:06 PM GMT -06:00 US/Canada Central Subject: Re: The alternative to: HeaderContributor.forCss The replacement for the deprecated method is written in the JavaDocs. http://wicket.apache.org/docs/1.4/org/apache/wicket/behavior/HeaderContributor.html -- Jeremy Thomerson http://www.wickettraining.com On Mon, Sep 7, 2009 at 10:18 PM, David Brown dbr...@sexingtechnologies.comwrote: Hello, something I have been ignoring for a long time is in the subject line. Though my IDE tells me it is deprecated I have not see a good alternative anywhere (wicketstuff, google, etc.). All of my CSS is in several files and directories under one directory named: style. What is a good WebPage class by WebPage class way of including the path to the CSS files. I would prefer something that easily references the resources directory. The entire app gets the same CSS applied. Regards and please advise, David. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: Passing parameters from markup to panels
Chris Colman wrote: I've thought of a very ugly way of doing it with the current version of wicket but it relies on quite a lot of smoke and mirrors and hooking into the component creation process. I'll give that a go for now. We went a similar but still different way :) We use our own XML formatted files from which we render HTML, Swing, FOP, Excel... Because of this the designer can not only change the fields and their bindings but also parameters like rowcount in lists. Cheers, Adrian - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
RE: Flash/ExternalInterface does not work in IE if movie is fetched via Wicket/Ajax
There is a bug in wicket-ajax.js:268 (1.4.1) that breaks
IE+Flash/ExternalInterface:
// place all newly created elements before the old element
while(tempParent.childNodes.length 0) {
var tempElement = tempParent.childNodes[0];
tempParent.removeChild(tempElement);
parent.insertBefore(tempElement, element);
tempElement = null;
}
Calling removeChild is not needed because insertBefore moves element from its
original place.
If you remove removeChild line and check tempParent.childNodes.length you
can see that it is
decreased by one after insertBefore.
This removeChild breaks Flash/ExternalInterface in IE. If removeChild is
removed then everything
works fine. IE is more strict here than other browsers.
Demonstration is still at (there is no need for Flash CS4 to test this)
http://download.syncrontech.com/public/quickstart_noname.zip
Could someone confirm this and suggest how to proceed ?
-Heikki
-Original Message-
From: Heikki Uotinen [mailto:heikki.uoti...@syncrontech.com]
Sent: 7. syyskuuta 2009 9:21
To: users@wicket.apache.org
Subject: RE: Flash/ExternalInterface does not work in IE if movie is fetched
via Wicket/Ajax
There is a problem with IE/ExternalInterface if movie is added to DOM f.ex
appendChild
JavaScript functions are called but they do not return any value.
This is clearly MS problem but could IE specific function in wicket-ajax.js be
adjusted somehow ?
Simple test case has
var flashMovie = 'OBJECT id=testId codeBase=http://fpdownload..
// Works in IE and FF
document.getElementById(testdiv).innerHTML = flashMovie;
// ExternalInterface.call calls JS but does not return value in IE.
Works in FF
var tempDiv = document.createElement(div);
tempDiv.innerHTML = flashMovie;
document.body.appendChild(tempDiv);
Here is complete code (ajax.swf can be found in zip files)
http://pastebin.com/fbc0aa9a
Here is AS3 code in ajax.fla
http://pastebin.com/d4efd47b
-Heikki
-Original Message-
From: Mikko Pukki [mailto:mikko.pu...@syncrontech.com]
Sent: 4. syyskuuta 2009 15:33
To: users@wicket.apache.org
Subject: Flash/ExternalInterface does not work in IE if movie is fetched via
Wicket/Ajax
Hi,
This example demonstrates that ExternalInterface fails with IE only if movie is
fetched via Wicket/Ajax.
ajaxtest.zip:
(http://download.syncrontech.com/public/ajaxtest.zip)
Page first.html fetches second.html page via Ajax. Second.html has Flash
movie
that calls JavaScript methods with ExternalInterface and produces output
Start...
ExternalInterface.available:true
ExternalInterface.objectID:testId
fromJs:text from js (first.html)
This works both FF 3.5 and IE 7/IE8
quickstart_noname.zip:
(http://download.syncrontech.com/public/quickstart_noname.zip)
Same demonstration with wicket. This fails with IE
Start...
ExternalInterface.available:true
ExternalInterface.objectID:null
fromJs:null
ObjectId is null and JavaScript call does not return any value.
We are aware about EI/IE problems in past, but any of those does not seem to
fit here.
Wicket 1.4.1, Flash Player 10, IE 7/8, FF 3.5
Has anyone encountered any similar behavior and/or has found any workaround?
Should I create a Jira issue?
--
Mikko Pukki
Syncron Tech Oy
Laserkatu 6
53850 Lappeenranta
+358 400 757 178
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: Flash/ExternalInterface does not work in IE if movie is fetched via Wicket/Ajax
Well, it's not exactly wrong. Looks like an IE quirk to me. But I
suppose we can just move the element anyway.
-Matej
On Tue, Sep 8, 2009 at 11:10 PM, Matej Knoppmatej.kn...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
can you create jira issue with problem description? The code indeed
looks wrong I can fix it once the issue is created.
-Matej
On Tue, Sep 8, 2009 at 9:59 PM, Heikki
Uotinenheikki.uoti...@syncrontech.com wrote:
There is a bug in wicket-ajax.js:268 (1.4.1) that breaks
IE+Flash/ExternalInterface:
// place all newly created elements before the old element
while(tempParent.childNodes.length 0) {
var tempElement = tempParent.childNodes[0];
tempParent.removeChild(tempElement);
parent.insertBefore(tempElement, element);
tempElement = null;
}
Calling removeChild is not needed because insertBefore moves element from
its original place.
If you remove removeChild line and check tempParent.childNodes.length
you can see that it is
decreased by one after insertBefore.
This removeChild breaks Flash/ExternalInterface in IE. If removeChild is
removed then everything
works fine. IE is more strict here than other browsers.
Demonstration is still at (there is no need for Flash CS4 to test this)
http://download.syncrontech.com/public/quickstart_noname.zip
Could someone confirm this and suggest how to proceed ?
-Heikki
-Original Message-
From: Heikki Uotinen [mailto:heikki.uoti...@syncrontech.com]
Sent: 7. syyskuuta 2009 9:21
To: users@wicket.apache.org
Subject: RE: Flash/ExternalInterface does not work in IE if movie is fetched
via Wicket/Ajax
There is a problem with IE/ExternalInterface if movie is added to DOM f.ex
appendChild
JavaScript functions are called but they do not return any value.
This is clearly MS problem but could IE specific function in wicket-ajax.js
be adjusted somehow ?
Simple test case has
var flashMovie = 'OBJECT id=testId codeBase=http://fpdownload..
// Works in IE and FF
document.getElementById(testdiv).innerHTML = flashMovie;
// ExternalInterface.call calls JS but does not return value in IE.
Works in FF
var tempDiv = document.createElement(div);
tempDiv.innerHTML = flashMovie;
document.body.appendChild(tempDiv);
Here is complete code (ajax.swf can be found in zip files)
http://pastebin.com/fbc0aa9a
Here is AS3 code in ajax.fla
http://pastebin.com/d4efd47b
-Heikki
-Original Message-
From: Mikko Pukki [mailto:mikko.pu...@syncrontech.com]
Sent: 4. syyskuuta 2009 15:33
To: users@wicket.apache.org
Subject: Flash/ExternalInterface does not work in IE if movie is fetched via
Wicket/Ajax
Hi,
This example demonstrates that ExternalInterface fails with IE only if movie
is fetched via Wicket/Ajax.
ajaxtest.zip:
(http://download.syncrontech.com/public/ajaxtest.zip)
Page first.html fetches second.html page via Ajax. Second.html has Flash
movie
that calls JavaScript methods with ExternalInterface and produces output
Start...
ExternalInterface.available:true
ExternalInterface.objectID:testId
fromJs:text from js (first.html)
This works both FF 3.5 and IE 7/IE8
quickstart_noname.zip:
(http://download.syncrontech.com/public/quickstart_noname.zip)
Same demonstration with wicket. This fails with IE
Start...
ExternalInterface.available:true
ExternalInterface.objectID:null
fromJs:null
ObjectId is null and JavaScript call does not return any value.
We are aware about EI/IE problems in past, but any of those does not seem to
fit here.
Wicket 1.4.1, Flash Player 10, IE 7/8, FF 3.5
Has anyone encountered any similar behavior and/or has found any workaround?
Should I create a Jira issue?
--
Mikko Pukki
Syncron Tech Oy
Laserkatu 6
53850 Lappeenranta
+358 400 757 178
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: Flash/ExternalInterface does not work in IE if movie is fetched via Wicket/Ajax
Hi,
can you create jira issue with problem description? The code indeed
looks wrong I can fix it once the issue is created.
-Matej
On Tue, Sep 8, 2009 at 9:59 PM, Heikki
Uotinenheikki.uoti...@syncrontech.com wrote:
There is a bug in wicket-ajax.js:268 (1.4.1) that breaks
IE+Flash/ExternalInterface:
// place all newly created elements before the old element
while(tempParent.childNodes.length 0) {
var tempElement = tempParent.childNodes[0];
tempParent.removeChild(tempElement);
parent.insertBefore(tempElement, element);
tempElement = null;
}
Calling removeChild is not needed because insertBefore moves element from its
original place.
If you remove removeChild line and check tempParent.childNodes.length you
can see that it is
decreased by one after insertBefore.
This removeChild breaks Flash/ExternalInterface in IE. If removeChild is
removed then everything
works fine. IE is more strict here than other browsers.
Demonstration is still at (there is no need for Flash CS4 to test this)
http://download.syncrontech.com/public/quickstart_noname.zip
Could someone confirm this and suggest how to proceed ?
-Heikki
-Original Message-
From: Heikki Uotinen [mailto:heikki.uoti...@syncrontech.com]
Sent: 7. syyskuuta 2009 9:21
To: users@wicket.apache.org
Subject: RE: Flash/ExternalInterface does not work in IE if movie is fetched
via Wicket/Ajax
There is a problem with IE/ExternalInterface if movie is added to DOM f.ex
appendChild
JavaScript functions are called but they do not return any value.
This is clearly MS problem but could IE specific function in wicket-ajax.js
be adjusted somehow ?
Simple test case has
var flashMovie = 'OBJECT id=testId codeBase=http://fpdownload..
// Works in IE and FF
document.getElementById(testdiv).innerHTML = flashMovie;
// ExternalInterface.call calls JS but does not return value in IE.
Works in FF
var tempDiv = document.createElement(div);
tempDiv.innerHTML = flashMovie;
document.body.appendChild(tempDiv);
Here is complete code (ajax.swf can be found in zip files)
http://pastebin.com/fbc0aa9a
Here is AS3 code in ajax.fla
http://pastebin.com/d4efd47b
-Heikki
-Original Message-
From: Mikko Pukki [mailto:mikko.pu...@syncrontech.com]
Sent: 4. syyskuuta 2009 15:33
To: users@wicket.apache.org
Subject: Flash/ExternalInterface does not work in IE if movie is fetched via
Wicket/Ajax
Hi,
This example demonstrates that ExternalInterface fails with IE only if movie
is fetched via Wicket/Ajax.
ajaxtest.zip:
(http://download.syncrontech.com/public/ajaxtest.zip)
Page first.html fetches second.html page via Ajax. Second.html has Flash
movie
that calls JavaScript methods with ExternalInterface and produces output
Start...
ExternalInterface.available:true
ExternalInterface.objectID:testId
fromJs:text from js (first.html)
This works both FF 3.5 and IE 7/IE8
quickstart_noname.zip:
(http://download.syncrontech.com/public/quickstart_noname.zip)
Same demonstration with wicket. This fails with IE
Start...
ExternalInterface.available:true
ExternalInterface.objectID:null
fromJs:null
ObjectId is null and JavaScript call does not return any value.
We are aware about EI/IE problems in past, but any of those does not seem to
fit here.
Wicket 1.4.1, Flash Player 10, IE 7/8, FF 3.5
Has anyone encountered any similar behavior and/or has found any workaround?
Should I create a Jira issue?
--
Mikko Pukki
Syncron Tech Oy
Laserkatu 6
53850 Lappeenranta
+358 400 757 178
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: Wicket and FileUpload on Google App Engine
Hi uudashr, I gotta tell you've done terrific work! I tried it in my
wicket-GAE app and it worked :)
Comments/questions:
About wicket framework:
1- Is it possibly that the MultipartServletWebRequest can have this line:
DiskFileItemFactory factory = new DiskFileItemFactory();
...changed for...
DiskFileItemFactory factory = getFileItemFactory(); // and this would be
a protected method that would instanciate the DiskFileItemFactory by default
If that change could be done, instead of generate an exact copy of
MultipartServletWebRequest with that line different, we could just
extend it and override getFileItemFactory() method.
2- Once this code is properly review, where should be added? I'm not
sure that the wicket base framework would be the best place. But what
about some kind of wicket-gae-extension?
About your code:
1- In the classic onSubmit() in a form, what's the way I should store
the final file?
a) OutputStream fos = new DatastoreOutputStream(fileName);
fos.write(fileUpload.getInputStream().toByteArray()) (y tried this
option first and it didn't work, but i'm not sure I used it the right way)
b) FileStorage.instance().write(fileUpload.getInputStream(), filename);
(this option worked :))
2- I also found an issue related to the DATA_CHUNK_SIZE.
In your code this is declared as DATA_CHUNK_SIZE =
(int)(Bytes.megabytes(1).bytes() - Bytes.kilobytes(10).bytes());
In development environment worked fine, however, when using in
production environment (google's magic servers), an error ocurred. I
didn't copy the stack trace, but it said that the maximun entity (or
property, can't remember) size had been reached for the field data
(which of course has the file data). It said the maximun was 100
characters (actually less than a Megabyte?, which should be
1024*1024bytes?, maybe google app engine documentation needs a fix, not
quite sure about this). And strangely, in that case the file uploaded
had a size of 14Kb.
Finally, we reduced DATA_CHUNK_SIZE to 512Kb, and it worked fine.
Anyway, I wanted to let you know so you can take a look.
Regards!
Daniele Dellafiore escribió:
Great, seems interesting, I will give this a try. Thanks.
On Sun, Aug 30, 2009 at 6:31 PM, uud ashr uuda...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi all
Just want to share.
If you have problem with file upload on Google App Engine, I just done some
experiment and it works.
Use the attached files.
I didn't create this, I just modify from the existing wicket source code.
I create new class, GaeSafeServletWebRequest which is subclass of
ServletWebRequest. Everyting come from here.
The key is remove the thread that clean the ReferenceQueue. So how to clean
it? I use something called FileCleaner.reapFiles(2) that will poll the queue
maximum 2 item. I put those line of code everytime GaeSafeServletWebRequest
created.
to use, you only need to override method *newWebRequest* on your wicket
application
@Override
protected WebRequest newWebRequest(final HttpServletRequest
servletRequest) {
return new GaeSafeServletWebRequest(servletRequest);
}
When you upload something, then write it using *DatastoreOutputStream*, it
will put all the bytes to GAE (Google App Engine) datastore. This
OutputStream already handle the over size, so it will create chunk files in
order to save the big file size.
Please tell me if it works for you (actually it works for me) and maybe we
can refine or create the better code. Or maybe we can add this to wicket? So
wicket can be FULL COMPATIBLE to Google App Engine.
Regards,
uudashr
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: Wicket and FileUpload on Google App Engine
On Wed, Sep 9, 2009 at 7:41 AM, Esteban Masoero emaso...@getsense.com.arwrote:
Hi uudashr, I gotta tell you've done terrific work! I tried it in my
wicket-GAE app and it worked :)
Comments/questions:
About wicket framework:
1- Is it possibly that the MultipartServletWebRequest can have this line:
DiskFileItemFactory factory = new DiskFileItemFactory();
...changed for...
DiskFileItemFactory factory = getFileItemFactory(); // and this would be a
protected method that would instanciate the DiskFileItemFactory by default
If that change could be done, instead of generate an exact copy of
MultipartServletWebRequest with that line different, we could just extend it
and override getFileItemFactory() method.
Yes of course, that would be good idea. To do that we have to modify the
wicket code, you have to ask that to wicket team.
2- Once this code is properly review, where should be added? I'm not sure
that the wicket base framework would be the best place. But what about some
kind of wicket-gae-extension?
About your code:
1- In the classic onSubmit() in a form, what's the way I should store the
final file?
a) OutputStream fos = new DatastoreOutputStream(fileName);
fos.write(fileUpload.getInputStream().toByteArray()) (y tried this option
first and it didn't work, but i'm not sure I used it the right way)
Strange, I didn't have toByteArray() method on InputStream. Just read it
from input stream and write it to DataStoreOutputStream. Doing toByteArray()
might bad idea, you can load big amount data on the memory if it's a big
file size.
b) FileStorage.instance().write(fileUpload.getInputStream(), filename);
(this option worked :))
2- I also found an issue related to the DATA_CHUNK_SIZE.
In your code this is declared as DATA_CHUNK_SIZE =
(int)(Bytes.megabytes(1).bytes() - Bytes.kilobytes(10).bytes());
In development environment worked fine, however, when using in production
environment (google's magic servers), an error ocurred. I didn't copy the
stack trace, but it said that the maximun entity (or property, can't
remember) size had been reached for the field data (which of course has
the file data). It said the maximun was 100 characters (actually less
than a Megabyte?, which should be 1024*1024bytes?, maybe google app engine
documentation needs a fix, not quite sure about this). And strangely, in
that case the file uploaded had a size of 14Kb.
Finally, we reduced DATA_CHUNK_SIZE to 512Kb, and it worked fine. Anyway, I
wanted to let you know so you can take a look.
Not sure what happen to you, but it works for me.
Regards!
Daniele Dellafiore escribió:
Great, seems interesting, I will give this a try. Thanks.
On Sun, Aug 30, 2009 at 6:31 PM, uud ashr uuda...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi all
Just want to share.
If you have problem with file upload on Google App Engine, I just done
some
experiment and it works.
Use the attached files.
I didn't create this, I just modify from the existing wicket source code.
I create new class, GaeSafeServletWebRequest which is subclass of
ServletWebRequest. Everyting come from here.
The key is remove the thread that clean the ReferenceQueue. So how to
clean
it? I use something called FileCleaner.reapFiles(2) that will poll the
queue
maximum 2 item. I put those line of code everytime
GaeSafeServletWebRequest
created.
to use, you only need to override method *newWebRequest* on your wicket
application
@Override
protected WebRequest newWebRequest(final HttpServletRequest
servletRequest) {
return new GaeSafeServletWebRequest(servletRequest);
}
When you upload something, then write it using *DatastoreOutputStream*,
it
will put all the bytes to GAE (Google App Engine) datastore. This
OutputStream already handle the over size, so it will create chunk files
in
order to save the big file size.
Please tell me if it works for you (actually it works for me) and maybe
we
can refine or create the better code. Or maybe we can add this to wicket?
So
wicket can be FULL COMPATIBLE to Google App Engine.
Regards,
uudashr
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
