Question about wicket validation
Hi! If a form validator depends on a nested form's components, it will assume they are valid because the nested form's components are validated after the parent form? ** Martin - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
[offtopic[ how to attach sources to wicket jars when debugging
I believe it must be something extremely simple. I set up a project in Eclipse Galileo using m2eclipse from Sonatype. I'm trying to debug the wicket class. I set breakpoints and the execution stops exactly at those points. The wicket sources are actually attached. I can see the source code. But when the execution stops at breakpoint eclipse says that there is no sources and variables panel does not show local variables. Could somebody give me a hint how I can debug wicket sources?
Re: [offtopic[ how to attach sources to wicket jars when debugging
El mar, 29-09-2009 a las 11:47 +0400, Vladimir Kovalyuk escribió:
I believe it must be something extremely simple.
I set up a project in Eclipse Galileo using m2eclipse from Sonatype.
I'm trying to debug the wicket class. I set breakpoints and the execution
stops exactly at those points. The wicket sources are actually attached. I
can see the source code. But when the execution stops at breakpoint eclipse
says that there is no sources and variables panel does not show local
variables.
Could somebody give me a hint how I can debug wicket sources?
In Debug Configurations windows ('Run' menu - Debug
Configurations...) choose the configuration for your project and then in
the Source tab add the path to the sources (Add button - External
Archive)
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: [WicketStuff] Iolite
Hi, We have been developing a few useful archetypes for our own client projects and courses. Amongst others, we have Wicket/Guice Wicket/Guice/Warp/Hibernate Wicket/Guice/Warp/JPA Wicket/Spring/JPA Spring/JPA/openJPA Spring/JPA/EclipseLink Spring/JDBC All include a running sample application with correct dependencies. We're currently deciding which jWeekend server to host these on (and their catalog) and probably the source Regards - Richard Wilkinson Developer, jWeekend OO Java Technologies, Wicket Training and Development http://jWeekend.com nino martinez wael wrote: Hi Guys I've been using Guice for a while together with warp persist and dynamic finders. Would it be of any interest to switch Iolite to Guice? Please say if it has interest then I might do it, but won't if nobody uses it. http://www.wideplay.com/guicewebextensions2 http://www.wideplay.com/dynamicfinders http://code.google.com/p/google-guice/ Regards Nino - http://richard-wilkinson.co.uk My blog: http://richard-wilkinson.co.uk -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/-WicketStuff--Iolite-tp25652619p25659568.html Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: [WicketStuff] Iolite
Great! So should these be merged into Iolite? Anyhow the nice thing would be to put it into wicketstuff.. regards Nino 2009/9/29 richardwilko richardjohnwilkin...@gmail.com Hi, We have been developing a few useful archetypes for our own client projects and courses. Amongst others, we have Wicket/Guice Wicket/Guice/Warp/Hibernate Wicket/Guice/Warp/JPA Wicket/Spring/JPA Spring/JPA/openJPA Spring/JPA/EclipseLink Spring/JDBC All include a running sample application with correct dependencies. We're currently deciding which jWeekend server to host these on (and their catalog) and probably the source Regards - Richard Wilkinson Developer, jWeekend OO Java Technologies, Wicket Training and Development http://jWeekend.com nino martinez wael wrote: Hi Guys I've been using Guice for a while together with warp persist and dynamic finders. Would it be of any interest to switch Iolite to Guice? Please say if it has interest then I might do it, but won't if nobody uses it. http://www.wideplay.com/guicewebextensions2 http://www.wideplay.com/dynamicfinders http://code.google.com/p/google-guice/ Regards Nino - http://richard-wilkinson.co.uk My blog: http://richard-wilkinson.co.uk -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/-WicketStuff--Iolite-tp25652619p25659568.html Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: [offtopic[ how to attach sources to wicket jars when debugging
I don't use m2eclipse, but I have this in my pom.xml... plugin groupIdorg.apache.maven.plugins/groupId artifactIdmaven-eclipse-plugin/artifactId configuration downloadSourcestrue/downloadSources downloadJavadocstrue/downloadJavadocs /configuration /plugin Seems to do the trick. I would look first at the m2eclipse settings first, though. jk On Tue, Sep 29, 2009 at 11:47:23AM +0400, Vladimir Kovalyuk wrote: I believe it must be something extremely simple. I set up a project in Eclipse Galileo using m2eclipse from Sonatype. I'm trying to debug the wicket class. I set breakpoints and the execution stops exactly at those points. The wicket sources are actually attached. I can see the source code. But when the execution stops at breakpoint eclipse says that there is no sources and variables panel does not show local variables. Could somebody give me a hint how I can debug wicket sources? - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: AttributeModifier relative path rendering in conflict
May help: http://javathoughts.capesugarbird.com/2007/08/branding-wicket-application-take-2.html On Tue, Sep 29, 2009 at 2:03 AM, pete swulius pswul...@gmail.com wrote: All, I am trying to use an AttributeModifier to change the stylesheet used on a Page of mine. WebComponent styleComponent = new WebComponent( style ); styleComponent.add( new SimpleAttributeModifier( href, css/ + style.getName() + /stylesheet.css ) ); add( styleComponent ); The different stylesheets are located in sub-directories corresponding to style.getName(). The problem I have is that whatever code prepends all relative paths on the rendered page is not applying it to this 'modified attribute'. For instance: I see this link rel=shortcut icon type=image/x-icon href=favicon.ico render as link rel=shortcut icon type=image/x-icon href=../../favicon.ico but my modified style just renders as such: link wicket:id=style rel=stylesheet type=text/css href=css/foobar/stylesheet.css/ Obviously this relative path swipe happens before the attributes are modified. Is there a better way to do what I'm trying to do? Thank you! --pete -- Pedro Henrique Oliveira dos Santos
Re: Attempt to set model object on null model of component
You need to find if the component who throw the exception is the same agent constructed with lines you report and on what moment the component lost his model. On Mon, Sep 28, 2009 at 11:28 PM, Sam Barrow s...@sambarrow.com wrote: I'm getting this exception: java.lang.IllegalStateException: Attempt to set model object on null model of component: form:agent The only reason i can find is that the field has a null model, but i added a new Model() to the field and im still getting it DropDownChoiceAgent agent = new DropDownChoiceAgent(agent, new ModelAgent(), agentList); - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org -- Pedro Henrique Oliveira dos Santos
Re: Get converted value?
So sometimes validators will process formcomponents whose input has not been
converted??
Sometimes the form component validation method will test himself and
children for validations errors reported, before and after the user input
get converted.
On Tue, Sep 29, 2009 at 2:04 AM, Martin Makundi
martin.maku...@koodaripalvelut.com wrote:
Hi!
formComponent.getValue() allways gives you the latest user input OR
the model value. This is useful for validation purposes, but is there
a bluilt-in get converted value method?
There is getConvertedInput -method, but that will only give you the
user-submitted value if it has already been converted. The validation
sequence is a bit funny:
public void validate()
{
validateRequired();
if (isValid()) --- this validator will not receive
converted input
{
convertInput();
if (isValid())
So sometimes validators will process formcomponents whose input has
not been converted?? How to deal with that properly?
**
Martin
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
--
Pedro Henrique Oliveira dos Santos
Re: Get converted value?
Ah yes, but it does not actually validate. Very funny results. Is this
ok or am I doing something wrong?
Principally what I have is:
parent form
nested form - one per row
rowName
parentForm.add(duplicateRowValidator);
None of the rows is allowed to have duplicate names so what I do is:
duplicateRowValidator: foreach nestedRow if (!set.add(getLatestValue))
error(duplicate row);
Now I know I can get the latest value of the nested row using my own
helper method:
@SuppressWarnings(unchecked)
public static T T getConvertedValue(FormComponentT formComponent) {
return (T)
formComponent.getConverter(formComponent.getType()).convertToObject(formComponent.getValue(),
Session.get().getLocale());
}
BUT, is this necessary? Is there a framework method to do this for me?
**
Martin
2009/9/29 Pedro Santos pedros...@gmail.com:
So sometimes validators will process formcomponents whose input has not been
converted??
Sometimes the form component validation method will test himself and
children for validations errors reported, before and after the user input
get converted.
On Tue, Sep 29, 2009 at 2:04 AM, Martin Makundi
martin.maku...@koodaripalvelut.com wrote:
Hi!
formComponent.getValue() allways gives you the latest user input OR
the model value. This is useful for validation purposes, but is there
a bluilt-in get converted value method?
There is getConvertedInput -method, but that will only give you the
user-submitted value if it has already been converted. The validation
sequence is a bit funny:
public void validate()
{
validateRequired();
if (isValid()) --- this validator will not receive
converted input
{
convertInput();
if (isValid())
So sometimes validators will process formcomponents whose input has
not been converted?? How to deal with that properly?
**
Martin
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
--
Pedro Henrique Oliveira dos Santos
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: Get converted value?
Hi Martin,
Ah yes, but it does not actually validate.
you refers to validate method from FormComponent right? The javadoc says:
Performs full validation of the form component, which consists of calling
validateRequired(),
convertInput(), and validateValidators(). This method should only be used if
the form
component needs to be fully validated outside the form process.
@SuppressWarnings(unchecked)
public static T T getConvertedValue(FormComponentT formComponent) {
return (T)
formComponent.getConverter(formComponent.getType()).convertToObject(formComponent.getValue(),
Session.get().getLocale());
}
BUT, is this necessary? Is there a framework method to do this for me?
http://static.ddpoker.com/javadoc/wicket/1.4-rc2/org/apache/wicket/markup/html/form/FormComponent.html#getConvertedInput%28%29
On Tue, Sep 29, 2009 at 8:26 AM, Martin Makundi
martin.maku...@koodaripalvelut.com wrote:
Ah yes, but it does not actually validate. Very funny results. Is this
ok or am I doing something wrong?
Principally what I have is:
parent form
nested form - one per row
rowName
parentForm.add(duplicateRowValidator);
None of the rows is allowed to have duplicate names so what I do is:
duplicateRowValidator: foreach nestedRow if (!set.add(getLatestValue))
error(duplicate row);
Now I know I can get the latest value of the nested row using my own
helper method:
@SuppressWarnings(unchecked)
public static T T getConvertedValue(FormComponentT formComponent) {
return (T)
formComponent.getConverter(formComponent.getType()).convertToObject(formComponent.getValue(),
Session.get().getLocale());
}
BUT, is this necessary? Is there a framework method to do this for me?
**
Martin
2009/9/29 Pedro Santos pedros...@gmail.com:
So sometimes validators will process formcomponents whose input has not
been
converted??
Sometimes the form component validation method will test himself and
children for validations errors reported, before and after the user input
get converted.
On Tue, Sep 29, 2009 at 2:04 AM, Martin Makundi
martin.maku...@koodaripalvelut.com wrote:
Hi!
formComponent.getValue() allways gives you the latest user input OR
the model value. This is useful for validation purposes, but is there
a bluilt-in get converted value method?
There is getConvertedInput -method, but that will only give you the
user-submitted value if it has already been converted. The validation
sequence is a bit funny:
public void validate()
{
validateRequired();
if (isValid()) --- this validator will not
receive
converted input
{
convertInput();
if (isValid())
So sometimes validators will process formcomponents whose input has
not been converted?? How to deal with that properly?
**
Martin
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
--
Pedro Henrique Oliveira dos Santos
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
--
Pedro Henrique Oliveira dos Santos
better way to strip wicket markup / tags per page?
Hi,
on the wiki[1] it is described how to get rid of wicket markup such as
wicket:id attributes on a page basis.
The solution looks like a dirty hack to me which may go wrong when for
instance exceptions occur. Does anybody know of a better way?
For completeness sake, here is the code duplicated from the wiki:
private boolean stripTags;
public TestPage() {
stripTags = Application.get().getMarkupSettings().getStripWicketTags();
}
@Override
protected void onBeforeRender() {
Application.get().getMarkupSettings().setStripWicketTags(true);
}
@Override
protected void onAfterRender() {
Application.get().getMarkupSettings().setStripWicketTags(stripTags);
}
Thanks in advance,
Antoine.
References:
[1]
http://cwiki.apache.org/WICKET/how-to-remove-wicket-markup-from-output.html
Re: Get converted value?
BUT, is this necessary? Is there a framework method to do this for me?
http://static.ddpoker.com/javadoc/wicket/1.4-rc2/org/apache/wicket/markup/html/form/FormComponent.html#getConvertedInput%28%29
That is not the same. This is convertedINPUT. It will not give
anything if input has not been converted (convertInput must be called
first). And furthermore, it might be null when the component is
disabled. So getValue() seems to be the only reliable one?
**
Martin
On Tue, Sep 29, 2009 at 8:26 AM, Martin Makundi
martin.maku...@koodaripalvelut.com wrote:
Ah yes, but it does not actually validate. Very funny results. Is this
ok or am I doing something wrong?
Principally what I have is:
parent form
nested form - one per row
rowName
parentForm.add(duplicateRowValidator);
None of the rows is allowed to have duplicate names so what I do is:
duplicateRowValidator: foreach nestedRow if (!set.add(getLatestValue))
error(duplicate row);
Now I know I can get the latest value of the nested row using my own
helper method:
�...@suppresswarnings(unchecked)
public static T T getConvertedValue(FormComponentT formComponent) {
return (T)
formComponent.getConverter(formComponent.getType()).convertToObject(formComponent.getValue(),
Session.get().getLocale());
}
BUT, is this necessary? Is there a framework method to do this for me?
**
Martin
2009/9/29 Pedro Santos pedros...@gmail.com:
So sometimes validators will process formcomponents whose input has not
been
converted??
Sometimes the form component validation method will test himself and
children for validations errors reported, before and after the user input
get converted.
On Tue, Sep 29, 2009 at 2:04 AM, Martin Makundi
martin.maku...@koodaripalvelut.com wrote:
Hi!
formComponent.getValue() allways gives you the latest user input OR
the model value. This is useful for validation purposes, but is there
a bluilt-in get converted value method?
There is getConvertedInput -method, but that will only give you the
user-submitted value if it has already been converted. The validation
sequence is a bit funny:
public void validate()
{
validateRequired();
if (isValid()) --- this validator will not
receive
converted input
{
convertInput();
if (isValid())
So sometimes validators will process formcomponents whose input has
not been converted?? How to deal with that properly?
**
Martin
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
--
Pedro Henrique Oliveira dos Santos
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
--
Pedro Henrique Oliveira dos Santos
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: better way to strip wicket markup / tags per page?
In some situations during development...
With that in mind, this solution is absolutely ok.
2009/9/29 Antoine van Wel antoine.van@gmail.com
Hi,
on the wiki[1] it is described how to get rid of wicket markup such as
wicket:id attributes on a page basis.
The solution looks like a dirty hack to me which may go wrong when for
instance exceptions occur. Does anybody know of a better way?
For completeness sake, here is the code duplicated from the wiki:
private boolean stripTags;
public TestPage() {
stripTags =
Application.get().getMarkupSettings().getStripWicketTags();
}
@Override
protected void onBeforeRender() {
Application.get().getMarkupSettings().setStripWicketTags(true);
}
@Override
protected void onAfterRender() {
Application.get().getMarkupSettings().setStripWicketTags(stripTags);
}
Thanks in advance,
Antoine.
References:
[1]
http://cwiki.apache.org/WICKET/how-to-remove-wicket-markup-from-output.html
wicket 1.4.2
Hi, I found on https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET a release 1.4.2 of wicket, but it's not on the official page, nor on the mirror sites. Is it a public release or are the sites just not updated yet? regards Tomek
Re: wicket 1.4.2
Maybe this thread will explain why http://www.nabble.com/-vote--release-1.4.2-td25636013.html http://www.nabble.com/-vote--release-1.4.2-td25636013.html Best, Ernesto On Tue, Sep 29, 2009 at 2:38 PM, Tomek Sniadach tomek.sniad...@googlemail.com wrote: Hi, I found on https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET a release 1.4.2 of wicket, but it's not on the official page, nor on the mirror sites. Is it a public release or are the sites just not updated yet? regards Tomek
Re: wicket 1.4.2
A release is not done until officially announced at annou...@wicket.apache.org Martijn On Tue, Sep 29, 2009 at 2:38 PM, Tomek Sniadach tomek.sniad...@googlemail.com wrote: Hi, I found on https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET a release 1.4.2 of wicket, but it's not on the official page, nor on the mirror sites. Is it a public release or are the sites just not updated yet? regards Tomek -- Become a Wicket expert, learn from the best: http://wicketinaction.com Apache Wicket 1.4 increases type safety for web applications Get it now: http://www.apache.org/dyn/closer.cgi/wicket/1.4.0 - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: better way to strip wicket markup / tags per page?
Thanks for the lightning fast reply.
Yes it works fine under development. Still I don't like it - after all these
statements are also executed during production mode, and even though they
can't do any harm there, I'd rather not see them there at all. More a matter
of personal taste I guess.
Anyway I have something in mind to improve it according to my taste. Will
implement that when I got time... This is not really an urgent issue to me.
Thanks anyway for the reply - I'm assuming now there really is no other way
to do this than temporarily changing the global settings.
Antoine
On Tue, Sep 29, 2009 at 7:46 PM, Marat Radchenko
slonopotamusor...@gmail.com wrote:
In some situations during development...
With that in mind, this solution is absolutely ok.
2009/9/29 Antoine van Wel antoine.van@gmail.com
Hi,
on the wiki[1] it is described how to get rid of wicket markup such as
wicket:id attributes on a page basis.
The solution looks like a dirty hack to me which may go wrong when for
instance exceptions occur. Does anybody know of a better way?
For completeness sake, here is the code duplicated from the wiki:
private boolean stripTags;
public TestPage() {
stripTags =
Application.get().getMarkupSettings().getStripWicketTags();
}
@Override
protected void onBeforeRender() {
Application.get().getMarkupSettings().setStripWicketTags(true);
}
@Override
protected void onAfterRender() {
Application.get().getMarkupSettings().setStripWicketTags(stripTags);
}
Thanks in advance,
Antoine.
References:
[1]
http://cwiki.apache.org/WICKET/how-to-remove-wicket-markup-from-output.html
--
--8--8--
take your photos everywhere you go - http://www.memolio.com
--8--8--
We don't see things as they are, we see things as we are. - Anais Nin
Whether you think you can or whether you think you can't, you're right. -
Henry Ford
--8--8--
Re: wicket 1.4.2
Thanks Ernesto. :-) 2009/9/29 Ernesto Reinaldo Barreiro reier...@gmail.com Maybe this thread will explain why http://www.nabble.com/-vote--release-1.4.2-td25636013.html http://www.nabble.com/-vote--release-1.4.2-td25636013.html Best, Ernesto On Tue, Sep 29, 2009 at 2:38 PM, Tomek Sniadach tomek.sniad...@googlemail.com wrote: Hi, I found on https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET a release 1.4.2 of wicket, but it's not on the official page, nor on the mirror sites. Is it a public release or are the sites just not updated yet? regards Tomek
RE: better way to strip wicket markup / tags per page?
I don't see how this can work reliably when there is more than 1 user, AFAIK
wicket has no synchronization in place that prevents 2 pages from going through
the render phase at the same time. So if one page finishes rendering and
changes the setting to false while another page has just started rendering
(e.g. the line immediately after change the setting to true) then that page
will render with the wrong value.
Craig
-Original Message-
From: Antoine van Wel [mailto:antoine.van@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, September 29, 2009 9:03 AM
To: users@wicket.apache.org
Subject: Re: better way to strip wicket markup / tags per page?
Thanks for the lightning fast reply.
Yes it works fine under development. Still I don't like it - after all these
statements are also executed during production mode, and even though they
can't do any harm there, I'd rather not see them there at all. More a matter
of personal taste I guess.
Anyway I have something in mind to improve it according to my taste. Will
implement that when I got time... This is not really an urgent issue to me.
Thanks anyway for the reply - I'm assuming now there really is no other way
to do this than temporarily changing the global settings.
Antoine
On Tue, Sep 29, 2009 at 7:46 PM, Marat Radchenko
slonopotamusor...@gmail.com wrote:
In some situations during development...
With that in mind, this solution is absolutely ok.
2009/9/29 Antoine van Wel antoine.van@gmail.com
Hi,
on the wiki[1] it is described how to get rid of wicket markup such as
wicket:id attributes on a page basis.
The solution looks like a dirty hack to me which may go wrong when for
instance exceptions occur. Does anybody know of a better way?
For completeness sake, here is the code duplicated from the wiki:
private boolean stripTags;
public TestPage() {
stripTags =
Application.get().getMarkupSettings().getStripWicketTags();
}
@Override
protected void onBeforeRender() {
Application.get().getMarkupSettings().setStripWicketTags(true);
}
@Override
protected void onAfterRender() {
Application.get().getMarkupSettings().setStripWicketTags(stripTags);
}
Thanks in advance,
Antoine.
References:
[1]
http://cwiki.apache.org/WICKET/how-to-remove-wicket-markup-from-output.html
--
--8--8--
take your photos everywhere you go - http://www.memolio.com
--8--8--
We don't see things as they are, we see things as we are. - Anais Nin
Whether you think you can or whether you think you can't, you're right. -
Henry Ford
--8--8--
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: better way to strip wicket markup / tags per page?
on the wiki[1] it is described how to get rid of wicket markup such as
wicket:id attributes on a page basis
page basis is an specific page on your project, or you want to strip wicket
tags to all pages?
you can override application init method and put your configuration lines:
getMarkupSettings().setStripWicketTags(true);
or create your BasiPageParentWithoutWicketTagsSuperclass for those specific
pages extensions...
On Tue, Sep 29, 2009 at 8:40 AM, Antoine van Wel
antoine.van@gmail.comwrote:
Hi,
on the wiki[1] it is described how to get rid of wicket markup such as
wicket:id attributes on a page basis.
The solution looks like a dirty hack to me which may go wrong when for
instance exceptions occur. Does anybody know of a better way?
For completeness sake, here is the code duplicated from the wiki:
private boolean stripTags;
public TestPage() {
stripTags =
Application.get().getMarkupSettings().getStripWicketTags();
}
@Override
protected void onBeforeRender() {
Application.get().getMarkupSettings().setStripWicketTags(true);
}
@Override
protected void onAfterRender() {
Application.get().getMarkupSettings().setStripWicketTags(stripTags);
}
Thanks in advance,
Antoine.
References:
[1]
http://cwiki.apache.org/WICKET/how-to-remove-wicket-markup-from-output.html
--
Pedro Henrique Oliveira dos Santos
AutoComplete textfield ignores visible property within hierarchy.
When writing an autocomplete textfield on a form that is first visible,
and after an ajax call rendered invisible, the autocomplete textfields
on this form get rendered anyway in the ajax response.
The method renderAutocompleteHead in AbstractAutocompleteBehavior gets
executed,
even if the AutoComplete component to which it is attached is not visible
within the
component hierarchy.
Below the snippet of code that solved it for us ...
In the class AbstractAutoCompleteBehavior, a test on the visibility was
added.
public void renderHead(IHeaderResponse response) {
if(this.getComponent().isVisibleInHierarchy()) {
super.renderHead(response);
renderAutocompleteHead(response);
}
}
The error becomes visible in the debug window on the webpage.
There is already a bug report filed within jira, and a demo application is
included to simulate the problem.
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-2497
Met vriendelijke groeten,
ANN BAERT
ICT-DEPARTMENT
Internet technologie: Software Engineer
Tel.:+32 56 43 42 11
Fax:+32 56 43 44 88
E-mail: ann.ba...@tvh.com
Contactsheet: ANN BAERT TVH FORKLIFT PARTS nv-sa - BRABANTSTRAAT 15 -
B-8790 WAREGEM
Neem even pauze om onze website te bekijken en vertel ons hoe we u kunnen
helpen: www.tvh.com/nl Vooraleer ik print, denk ik aan het milieu.
DISCLAIMER
A HREF=http://www.tvh.be/newen/pages/emaildisclaimer.html;
http://www.tvh.be/newen/pages/emaildisclaimer.html /A
This message is delivered to all addressees subject to the conditions
set forth in the attached disclaimer, which is an integral part of this
message.
Re: Wicket in Italy
Padova :) Paolo Di Tommaso wrote: Roma (~) On Thu, Sep 24, 2009 at 8:46 AM, francesco dicarlo evilsephir...@gmail.comwrote: Hi, i've just worked on a project with wicket for a software house in Bari. But now i'm in Rome. Hope to see you in an event XD 2009/9/24 Luca Provenzani eufor...@gmail.com - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: AutoComplete textfield ignores visible property within hierarchy.
please open a jira issue.
-igor
On Tue, Sep 29, 2009 at 7:59 AM, Ann Baert ann.ba...@tvh.be wrote:
When writing an autocomplete textfield on a form that is first visible,
and after an ajax call rendered invisible, the autocomplete textfields
on this form get rendered anyway in the ajax response.
The method renderAutocompleteHead in AbstractAutocompleteBehavior gets
executed,
even if the AutoComplete component to which it is attached is not visible
within the
component hierarchy.
Below the snippet of code that solved it for us ...
In the class AbstractAutoCompleteBehavior, a test on the visibility was
added.
public void renderHead(IHeaderResponse response) {
if(this.getComponent().isVisibleInHierarchy()) {
super.renderHead(response);
renderAutocompleteHead(response);
}
}
The error becomes visible in the debug window on the webpage.
There is already a bug report filed within jira, and a demo application is
included to simulate the problem.
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-2497
Met vriendelijke groeten,
ANN BAERT
ICT-DEPARTMENT
Internet technologie: Software Engineer
Tel.: +32 56 43 42 11
Fax: +32 56 43 44 88
E-mail: ann.ba...@tvh.com
Contactsheet: ANN BAERT TVH FORKLIFT PARTS nv-sa - BRABANTSTRAAT 15 -
B-8790 WAREGEM
Neem even pauze om onze website te bekijken en vertel ons hoe we u kunnen
helpen: www.tvh.com/nl Vooraleer ik print, denk ik aan het milieu.
DISCLAIMER
A HREF=http://www.tvh.be/newen/pages/emaildisclaimer.html;
http://www.tvh.be/newen/pages/emaildisclaimer.html /A
This message is delivered to all addressees subject to the conditions
set forth in the attached disclaimer, which is an integral part of this
message.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: AttributeModifier relative path rendering in conflict
Ah, thank you. I will look into using HeaderContributor instead. I have a good feeling that will take care of my problem. I will post back my findings this afternoon. --pete
Preventing Copy Pasting URL's In Same Browser Session
Hi everyone, We have this requirement in which we cannot allow the customer to copy paste the url that's appearing in the address bar into the same browser. For example in a different tab or in a new window. This can easily be done in Wicket Framework since the url has a corresponding page attached to it. For example if i get http://localhost/wicket:interface=1 appearing in the address bar, I can open anew tab paste the url and I could get into the same page. The users don't want this behavior. Could I make it work in such a way that I copy http://localhost/wicket:inteface=1, when i try to copy and paste it, it will redirect me to an error page? This happens even after the user has already logged in. Really need help on this one. Thanks Carlo - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: Preventing Copy Pasting URL's In Same Browser Session
We have this requirement in which we cannot allow the customer to copy paste the url that's appearing in the address bar into the same browser. Crazy thing. How about to include an request counter to your url encode/decode strategy? On Tue, Sep 29, 2009 at 1:41 PM, Carlo Camerino carlo.camer...@gmail.comwrote: Hi everyone, We have this requirement in which we cannot allow the customer to copy paste the url that's appearing in the address bar into the same browser. For example in a different tab or in a new window. This can easily be done in Wicket Framework since the url has a corresponding page attached to it. For example if i get http://localhost/wicket:interface=1 appearing in the address bar, I can open anew tab paste the url and I could get into the same page. The users don't want this behavior. Could I make it work in such a way that I copy http://localhost/wicket:inteface=1, when i try to copy and paste it, it will redirect me to an error page? This happens even after the user has already logged in. Really need help on this one. Thanks Carlo - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org -- Pedro Henrique Oliveira dos Santos
Re: Preventing Copy Pasting URL's In Same Browser Session
On Tue, Sep 29, 2009 at 6:48 PM, Pedro Santos pedros...@gmail.com wrote: We have this requirement in which we cannot allow the customer to copy paste the url that's appearing in the address bar into the same browser. Crazy thing. How about to include an request counter to your url encode/decode strategy? That wouldn't work. Or it would prevent refresh as well. This is not really doable. If you need this kind of control web applications simply aren't what you should be doing. -Matej On Tue, Sep 29, 2009 at 1:41 PM, Carlo Camerino carlo.camer...@gmail.comwrote: Hi everyone, We have this requirement in which we cannot allow the customer to copy paste the url that's appearing in the address bar into the same browser. For example in a different tab or in a new window. This can easily be done in Wicket Framework since the url has a corresponding page attached to it. For example if i get http://localhost/wicket:interface=1 appearing in the address bar, I can open anew tab paste the url and I could get into the same page. The users don't want this behavior. Could I make it work in such a way that I copy http://localhost/wicket:inteface=1, when i try to copy and paste it, it will redirect me to an error page? This happens even after the user has already logged in. Really need help on this one. Thanks Carlo - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org -- Pedro Henrique Oliveira dos Santos - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: Preventing Copy Pasting URL's In Same Browser Session
could'nt he just have a page map with a size of 0? Of course reloads would'nt work and probably a bunch of other stuff too.. Seems like at strange thing to limit on though. 2009/9/29 Matej Knopp matej.kn...@gmail.com On Tue, Sep 29, 2009 at 6:48 PM, Pedro Santos pedros...@gmail.com wrote: We have this requirement in which we cannot allow the customer to copy paste the url that's appearing in the address bar into the same browser. Crazy thing. How about to include an request counter to your url encode/decode strategy? That wouldn't work. Or it would prevent refresh as well. This is not really doable. If you need this kind of control web applications simply aren't what you should be doing. -Matej On Tue, Sep 29, 2009 at 1:41 PM, Carlo Camerino carlo.camer...@gmail.comwrote: Hi everyone, We have this requirement in which we cannot allow the customer to copy paste the url that's appearing in the address bar into the same browser. For example in a different tab or in a new window. This can easily be done in Wicket Framework since the url has a corresponding page attached to it. For example if i get http://localhost/wicket:interface=1 appearing in the address bar, I can open anew tab paste the url and I could get into the same page. The users don't want this behavior. Could I make it work in such a way that I copy http://localhost/wicket:inteface=1, when i try to copy and paste it, it will redirect me to an error page? This happens even after the user has already logged in. Really need help on this one. Thanks Carlo - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org -- Pedro Henrique Oliveira dos Santos - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: Preventing Copy Pasting URL's In Same Browser Session
ya it's sort of our requirement i don't think i would set my pagemap to 0. i'm thinking of a control i could use in order to determine that this page is accessed. i'm thinking of the best way to do it though. i could maybe include a hidden field in each of my form that i have to check each time and check each request. i don't know if this is possible. On Wed, Sep 30, 2009 at 1:29 AM, nino martinez wael nino.martinez.w...@gmail.com wrote: could'nt he just have a page map with a size of 0? Of course reloads would'nt work and probably a bunch of other stuff too.. Seems like at strange thing to limit on though. 2009/9/29 Matej Knopp matej.kn...@gmail.com On Tue, Sep 29, 2009 at 6:48 PM, Pedro Santos pedros...@gmail.com wrote: We have this requirement in which we cannot allow the customer to copy paste the url that's appearing in the address bar into the same browser. Crazy thing. How about to include an request counter to your url encode/decode strategy? That wouldn't work. Or it would prevent refresh as well. This is not really doable. If you need this kind of control web applications simply aren't what you should be doing. -Matej On Tue, Sep 29, 2009 at 1:41 PM, Carlo Camerino carlo.camer...@gmail.comwrote: Hi everyone, We have this requirement in which we cannot allow the customer to copy paste the url that's appearing in the address bar into the same browser. For example in a different tab or in a new window. This can easily be done in Wicket Framework since the url has a corresponding page attached to it. For example if i get http://localhost/wicket:interface=1 appearing in the address bar, I can open anew tab paste the url and I could get into the same page. The users don't want this behavior. Could I make it work in such a way that I copy http://localhost/wicket:inteface=1, when i try to copy and paste it, it will redirect me to an error page? This happens even after the user has already logged in. Really need help on this one. Thanks Carlo - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org -- Pedro Henrique Oliveira dos Santos - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: Preventing Copy Pasting URL's In Same Browser Session
I'm guessing they are trying to limit users from taking a test in one window and seeing the previous answers in another. -Clint On Tue, Sep 29, 2009 at 12:29 PM, nino martinez wael nino.martinez.w...@gmail.com wrote: could'nt he just have a page map with a size of 0? Of course reloads would'nt work and probably a bunch of other stuff too.. Seems like at strange thing to limit on though. 2009/9/29 Matej Knopp matej.kn...@gmail.com On Tue, Sep 29, 2009 at 6:48 PM, Pedro Santos pedros...@gmail.com wrote: We have this requirement in which we cannot allow the customer to copy paste the url that's appearing in the address bar into the same browser. Crazy thing. How about to include an request counter to your url encode/decode strategy? That wouldn't work. Or it would prevent refresh as well. This is not really doable. If you need this kind of control web applications simply aren't what you should be doing. -Matej On Tue, Sep 29, 2009 at 1:41 PM, Carlo Camerino carlo.camer...@gmail.comwrote: Hi everyone, We have this requirement in which we cannot allow the customer to copy paste the url that's appearing in the address bar into the same browser. For example in a different tab or in a new window. This can easily be done in Wicket Framework since the url has a corresponding page attached to it. For example if i get http://localhost/wicket:interface=1 appearing in the address bar, I can open anew tab paste the url and I could get into the same page. The users don't want this behavior. Could I make it work in such a way that I copy http://localhost/wicket:inteface=1, when i try to copy and paste it, it will redirect me to an error page? This happens even after the user has already logged in. Really need help on this one. Thanks Carlo - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org -- Pedro Henrique Oliveira dos Santos - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: Preventing Copy Pasting URL's In Same Browser Session
Ahh good example for usage :) 2009/9/29 Clint Checketts checke...@gmail.com I'm guessing they are trying to limit users from taking a test in one window and seeing the previous answers in another. -Clint On Tue, Sep 29, 2009 at 12:29 PM, nino martinez wael nino.martinez.w...@gmail.com wrote: could'nt he just have a page map with a size of 0? Of course reloads would'nt work and probably a bunch of other stuff too.. Seems like at strange thing to limit on though. 2009/9/29 Matej Knopp matej.kn...@gmail.com On Tue, Sep 29, 2009 at 6:48 PM, Pedro Santos pedros...@gmail.com wrote: We have this requirement in which we cannot allow the customer to copy paste the url that's appearing in the address bar into the same browser. Crazy thing. How about to include an request counter to your url encode/decode strategy? That wouldn't work. Or it would prevent refresh as well. This is not really doable. If you need this kind of control web applications simply aren't what you should be doing. -Matej On Tue, Sep 29, 2009 at 1:41 PM, Carlo Camerino carlo.camer...@gmail.comwrote: Hi everyone, We have this requirement in which we cannot allow the customer to copy paste the url that's appearing in the address bar into the same browser. For example in a different tab or in a new window. This can easily be done in Wicket Framework since the url has a corresponding page attached to it. For example if i get http://localhost/wicket:interface=1 appearing in the address bar, I can open anew tab paste the url and I could get into the same page. The users don't want this behavior. Could I make it work in such a way that I copy http://localhost/wicket:inteface=1, when i try to copy and paste it, it will redirect me to an error page? This happens even after the user has already logged in. Really need help on this one. Thanks Carlo - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org -- Pedro Henrique Oliveira dos Santos - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: Preventing Copy Pasting URL's In Same Browser Session
Okay in that case you should be able to use some of the stuff that are used in apps that are supposed be *cross*-*site* request *forgery proof*, search the list for that. 2009/9/29 Carlo Camerino carlo.camer...@gmail.com ya it's sort of our requirement i don't think i would set my pagemap to 0. i'm thinking of a control i could use in order to determine that this page is accessed. i'm thinking of the best way to do it though. i could maybe include a hidden field in each of my form that i have to check each time and check each request. i don't know if this is possible. On Wed, Sep 30, 2009 at 1:29 AM, nino martinez wael nino.martinez.w...@gmail.com wrote: could'nt he just have a page map with a size of 0? Of course reloads would'nt work and probably a bunch of other stuff too.. Seems like at strange thing to limit on though. 2009/9/29 Matej Knopp matej.kn...@gmail.com On Tue, Sep 29, 2009 at 6:48 PM, Pedro Santos pedros...@gmail.com wrote: We have this requirement in which we cannot allow the customer to copy paste the url that's appearing in the address bar into the same browser. Crazy thing. How about to include an request counter to your url encode/decode strategy? That wouldn't work. Or it would prevent refresh as well. This is not really doable. If you need this kind of control web applications simply aren't what you should be doing. -Matej On Tue, Sep 29, 2009 at 1:41 PM, Carlo Camerino carlo.camer...@gmail.comwrote: Hi everyone, We have this requirement in which we cannot allow the customer to copy paste the url that's appearing in the address bar into the same browser. For example in a different tab or in a new window. This can easily be done in Wicket Framework since the url has a corresponding page attached to it. For example if i get http://localhost/wicket:interface=1 appearing in the address bar, I can open anew tab paste the url and I could get into the same page. The users don't want this behavior. Could I make it work in such a way that I copy http://localhost/wicket:inteface=1, when i try to copy and paste it, it will redirect me to an error page? This happens even after the user has already logged in. Really need help on this one. Thanks Carlo - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org -- Pedro Henrique Oliveira dos Santos - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: Preventing Copy Pasting URL's In Same Browser Session
Your options here are rather limited. Wicket or not, it is still a web application. HTTP is a stateless protocol. There are ways/hacks to detect opening page in new window/tab but they require javascript and are not 100% bullet proof. If you need real solution for this forget about web applications. Do it as java applet or flash or silverlight or something similar. -Matej On Tue, Sep 29, 2009 at 7:55 PM, Carlo Camerino carlo.camer...@gmail.com wrote: ya it's sort of our requirement i don't think i would set my pagemap to 0. i'm thinking of a control i could use in order to determine that this page is accessed. i'm thinking of the best way to do it though. i could maybe include a hidden field in each of my form that i have to check each time and check each request. i don't know if this is possible. On Wed, Sep 30, 2009 at 1:29 AM, nino martinez wael nino.martinez.w...@gmail.com wrote: could'nt he just have a page map with a size of 0? Of course reloads would'nt work and probably a bunch of other stuff too.. Seems like at strange thing to limit on though. 2009/9/29 Matej Knopp matej.kn...@gmail.com On Tue, Sep 29, 2009 at 6:48 PM, Pedro Santos pedros...@gmail.com wrote: We have this requirement in which we cannot allow the customer to copy paste the url that's appearing in the address bar into the same browser. Crazy thing. How about to include an request counter to your url encode/decode strategy? That wouldn't work. Or it would prevent refresh as well. This is not really doable. If you need this kind of control web applications simply aren't what you should be doing. -Matej On Tue, Sep 29, 2009 at 1:41 PM, Carlo Camerino carlo.camer...@gmail.comwrote: Hi everyone, We have this requirement in which we cannot allow the customer to copy paste the url that's appearing in the address bar into the same browser. For example in a different tab or in a new window. This can easily be done in Wicket Framework since the url has a corresponding page attached to it. For example if i get http://localhost/wicket:interface=1 appearing in the address bar, I can open anew tab paste the url and I could get into the same page. The users don't want this behavior. Could I make it work in such a way that I copy http://localhost/wicket:inteface=1, when i try to copy and paste it, it will redirect me to an error page? This happens even after the user has already logged in. Really need help on this one. Thanks Carlo - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org -- Pedro Henrique Oliveira dos Santos - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: Question about wicket validation
protected final void validate()
{
if (isEnabledInHierarchy() isVisibleInHierarchy())
{
// since this method can be called directly by users,
this additional
check is needed
validateComponents();
validateFormValidators();
onValidate();
validateNestedForms();
}
}
MartinM wrote:
Hi!
If a form validator depends on a nested form's components, it will
assume they are valid because the nested form's components are
validated after the parent form?
**
Martin
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Question-about-wicket-validation-tp25657602p25669362.html
Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: Selectively ignoring required fields
I'm bringing up my old thread here, as I found something that works
well enough, and it might help someone to have it in the list
archive.)
2009/9/15 Pedro Santos pedros...@gmail.com:
On the other hand, maybe that whole criteria panel is deselected, in
which case I want to be able to stop the whole thing from doing any
validation at all, so it won't even look at whether the check box is
checked.
disable panel don't work on that case?
Just overriding isEnabled didn't do the trick by itself, but I found a
rather nasty little hack. The issue is that the individual panels
need to always be enabled for rendering, but only selectively enabled
at processing. Also, the decision about which panel to enable is
based on incoming data, which isn't always ready when needed. A
solution is to have each panel check whether it is enabled, by calling
up to the parent panel. The parent does this:
public boolean isItMyTurn(Criteria panel) {
if (this.rendering) {
return true;
} else {
this.radios.inputChanged();
int index = Integer.parseInt(this.radios.getRawInput());
Criteria active = this.panels.get(index);
if (active == panel) {
return true;
}
}
return false;
}
Where rendering is set in before and after render methods, and the
radio buttons are partially processed out of sequence to get the input
when its needed.
I don't know how safe this is, but it seems to work.
Thanks everyone.
On Tue, Sep 15, 2009 at 11:10 AM, Phil Housley
undeconstruc...@gmail.comwrote:
2009/9/15 Bas Gooren b...@iswd.nl:
The fact of the matter is that you will need extra logic _somewhere_.
It's a
matter of personal preference where you put it (overriden components,
ajax,
override form methods, ...).
If what you're trying to accomplish is difficult given a certain set of
tools, my experience is that it's good to rethink the problem.
On the one hand you want isolation (components can have logic to say if
they
are required), and on the other hand you want to break outside of this
isolation (form needs to control required flag on components). Having
this
logic in two different places is error-prone (at least from my
experience).
So why not have a single point in your code where you deal with the
required
flags of these components?
Bas
A good point, but I don't think it exactly applies in this case. What
I really want is for each component to know whether it is required
within a very small context. For example, a might have a criteria
panel (one of the sub-parts of the searcher) set out as follows:
[x] must be a foo called [_]
In which case, the sub panel will be in total charge of whether the
text field is required.
On the other hand, maybe that whole criteria panel is deselected, in
which case I want to be able to stop the whole thing from doing any
validation at all, so it won't even look at whether the check box is
checked.
What I am thinking currently is to sadly discard the built in
validation, and have each criteria panel report its errors manually
when asked to by the parent to pass on its generated set of criteria
(a map basically), which it has built out of its input. I don't like
it at all, as it lets bad data get too far into the system, but I
think it will solve the immediate problem.
Phil.
- Original Message - From: Phil Housley
undeconstruc...@gmail.com
To: users@wicket.apache.org
Sent: Tuesday, September 15, 2009 3:37 PM
Subject: Re: Selectively ignoring required fields
Several interesting ideas, but they all seem to involve more invasive
changes than I really want to make - either changing component classes
or changing values of components at process time, which would be hard
to undo (and maybe not possible, as some components already have logic
to say if they are required.)
From hunting through the code, what would be about perfect would be to
override org.apache.wicket.markup.html.form.Form#validateComponents(),
but unfortunately that is final. Even if I were to copy some of the
code into my form class, there are some private methods of Form that I
would need to call.
Has anyone perhaps had a similar issue somewhere else?
Thanks again,
Phil.
2009/9/15 Bas Gooren b...@iswd.nl:
Phil,
The way we deal with this is by using an ajax behavior on radiobuttons,
and
update the required flag on dependant fields from there.
Another way (without ajax) could be to update the required flag on the
form
components on submit, prior to validation.
E.g. by overriding Form.process() (or Form.validate(), since this is
related
to validation).
E.g. something like
Form form = new Form( id, ... ) {
protected void validate() {
Re: AjaxPagingNavigation
I'm using the AjaxPagingNavigation component and it works well, but when I click on one of the links, my url is replaced with /?wicket:interface=:3:4::: You refers to html A tag generated by navigations links. What you got on onclick tag attribute on your rendered page? On Mon, Sep 28, 2009 at 9:57 PM, Douglas Ferguson doug...@douglasferguson.us wrote: I'm using the AjaxPagingNavigation component and it works well, but when I click on one of the links, my url is replaced with /?wicket:interface=:3:4::: This is making me thing that the entire page is getting replaced and not using ajax. Is is possible to get IPagingNavigationIncrementLink to use href=# instead of updating the url? D/ -- Pedro Henrique Oliveira dos Santos
Re: AjaxPagingNavigation
Is anybody successfully using this and witnessing ajax calls? I can't figure out why it isn't using Ajax as the name implies. I tried overriding the onAjaxEvent method, but it is never called. Douglas On Sep 28, 2009, at 7:57 PM, Douglas Ferguson wrote: I'm using the AjaxPagingNavigation component and it works well, but when I click on one of the links, my url is replaced with /?wicket:interface=:3:4::: This is making me thing that the entire page is getting replaced and not using ajax. Is is possible to get IPagingNavigationIncrementLink to use href=# instead of updating the url? D/ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Complicated workflows
Hello list, I'm currently working on some ideas for building apps with fairly complex workflows. My aim is to find a nice pattern/framework for building apps where each unit of work involves many panels, several forms, lots of decisions and so on. In particular I'm aiming at apps where you need to be very confident about exactly what is happening, so very strict control of actions, being careful of multiple renderings of a page each trying to change the server data, and so on. Also, I'm wondering about some options for declarative building of workflows out of existing tasks. My current design involves running from a special page, which maintains a stack of tasks. One type of task is a Workflow, which can be configured to automatically spawn subtasks as required, based on the result of previous tasks. Another type of task is based on a panel, and is able to cause itself to be rendered. The stack processor makes sure that each task is invoked at the right time, that a task can render if it is at the top of the stack, that only the top of the stack can be invoked from a form and so on. This is working ok for some silly demo cases, but there are various issues. For example, any task that is not also a component cannot access dependency injection, or set error messages and so on. I'm not sure how to get around this at the moment, as I don't want to force every task to be a component, when many will likely have no cause to ever be rendered. So, the reason I'm posting is to ask mainly two things: 1) Is this of interest to anyone else? All the code is my own, so I'll open source it if there seems to be some future in it. 2) If so, does anyone have any comments on my current design? Clearly there are problems with it, but should I carry on trying to find ways to work around them, or does the whole thing sounds like so much crack? Thanks, -- Phil Housley - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: Complicated workflows
If you're using Spring, the dependency injection issue for non-component items can be solved by adding the following line to the object's constructor: InjectorHolder.getInjector().inject(this); where InjectorHolder is org.apache.wicket.injection.web.InjectorHolder . I'm afraid I don't have any advice to offer you on the rest of it, except that it sounds like a good work and I hope you can get it doing what you need :) Dane On Tue, Sep 29, 2009 at 2:11 PM, Phil Housley undeconstruc...@gmail.com wrote: Hello list, I'm currently working on some ideas for building apps with fairly complex workflows. My aim is to find a nice pattern/framework for building apps where each unit of work involves many panels, several forms, lots of decisions and so on. In particular I'm aiming at apps where you need to be very confident about exactly what is happening, so very strict control of actions, being careful of multiple renderings of a page each trying to change the server data, and so on. Also, I'm wondering about some options for declarative building of workflows out of existing tasks. My current design involves running from a special page, which maintains a stack of tasks. One type of task is a Workflow, which can be configured to automatically spawn subtasks as required, based on the result of previous tasks. Another type of task is based on a panel, and is able to cause itself to be rendered. The stack processor makes sure that each task is invoked at the right time, that a task can render if it is at the top of the stack, that only the top of the stack can be invoked from a form and so on. This is working ok for some silly demo cases, but there are various issues. For example, any task that is not also a component cannot access dependency injection, or set error messages and so on. I'm not sure how to get around this at the moment, as I don't want to force every task to be a component, when many will likely have no cause to ever be rendered. So, the reason I'm posting is to ask mainly two things: 1) Is this of interest to anyone else? All the code is my own, so I'll open source it if there seems to be some future in it. 2) If so, does anyone have any comments on my current design? Clearly there are problems with it, but should I carry on trying to find ways to work around them, or does the whole thing sounds like so much crack? Thanks, -- Phil Housley - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: AttributeModifier relative path rendering in conflict
HeaderContributor is the answer. add( CSSPackageResource.getHeaderContribution( css/ + style.getName() + /promo.css ) ); The javadocs explicitly state that a css location that does not begin will a leading / (slash) will be have it's relative path prepended to it. http://wicket.apache.org/docs/1.4/org/apache/wicket/markup/html/CSSPackageResource.html Thank you for the help! --pete
Re: Preventing Copy Pasting URL's In Same Browser Session
I am not aware that Wicket has direct support for this kind of (mis-)behavior. You can, however employ some kind of cheating here. if you set the http headers to no-cache with the help of a servlet filter, the browser will not allow the page to be copy-pasted from local cache, and will re-request the page. if you include a (crypted) counter as one of the page parameters, you can easily check if this page was already served (if the counter is lower or equal than the last served url) and redirect to an error page accordingly. to fully disable the browser-cache use: response.addHeader(“Pragma”, “no-cache”); response.addHeader(“Cache-Control”, “no-cache”); response.addHeader(“Cache-Control”, “must-revalidate”); response.addHeader(“Expires”, “Mon, 8 Aug 2006 10:00:00 GMT”); // some date in the past BR Andreas The users don't want this behavior. Could I make it work in such a way that I copy http://localhost/wicket:inteface=1, when i try to copy and paste it, it will redirect me to an error page? This happens even after the user has already logged in. Really need help on this one. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: Preventing Copy Pasting URL's In Same Browser Session
What happens if the user (perhaps accidentally) refreshes page? -Matej On Tue, Sep 29, 2009 at 11:43 PM, Andreas Petersson andr...@petersson.at wrote: I am not aware that Wicket has direct support for this kind of (mis-)behavior. You can, however employ some kind of cheating here. if you set the http headers to no-cache with the help of a servlet filter, the browser will not allow the page to be copy-pasted from local cache, and will re-request the page. if you include a (crypted) counter as one of the page parameters, you can easily check if this page was already served (if the counter is lower or equal than the last served url) and redirect to an error page accordingly. to fully disable the browser-cache use: response.addHeader(“Pragma”, “no-cache”); response.addHeader(“Cache-Control”, “no-cache”); response.addHeader(“Cache-Control”, “must-revalidate”); response.addHeader(“Expires”, “Mon, 8 Aug 2006 10:00:00 GMT”); // some date in the past BR Andreas The users don't want this behavior. Could I make it work in such a way that I copy http://localhost/wicket:inteface=1, when i try to copy and paste it, it will redirect me to an error page? This happens even after the user has already logged in. Really need help on this one. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: Preventing Copy Pasting URL's In Same Browser Session
Matej Knopp schrieb: What happens if the user (perhaps accidentally) refreshes page? -Matej he would get an error page using the described approach. clearly not what you would want in a general-purpose web app. BR Andreas - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: Preventing Copy Pasting URL's In Same Browser Session
2009/9/29 Carlo Camerino carlo.camer...@gmail.com: Hi everyone, We have this requirement in which we cannot allow the customer to copy paste the url that's appearing in the address bar into the same browser. For example in a different tab or in a new window. This can easily be done in Wicket Framework since the url has a corresponding page attached to it. For example if i get http://localhost/wicket:interface=1 appearing in the address bar, I can open anew tab paste the url and I could get into the same page. The users don't want this behavior. Could I make it work in such a way that I copy http://localhost/wicket:inteface=1, when i try to copy and paste it, it will redirect me to an error page? This happens even after the user has already logged in. Really need help on this one. I've been playing with the ideas from http://day-to-day-stuff.blogspot.com/2008/10/wicket-extreme-consistent-urls.html for something of my own, which might fit the bill in a way. Following that you can convince wicket to serve up every instance of a mounted page from exactly the same URL. That means if you copy the url, you get a brand new instance of the page. You lose the ability to refresh, but if you are being strict on that sort of thing, I guess you will have a refresh button on the page when and only when it is appropriate. -- Phil Housley - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: Complicated workflows
Phil, Would an event-centric approach simplify things? I'm thinking that you could then have multiple listeners for a given event and the various listeners would not have to be aware of one another. This might reduce the task/sub-task interactions. Adding errors, or refreshing components could be handled by various listeners as needed. I've gone that route with reasonable luck. Of course I know precious little about your specific application... Cheers, Scott On Tue, Sep 29, 2009 at 2:11 PM, Phil Housley undeconstruc...@gmail.com wrote: Hello list, I'm currently working on some ideas for building apps with fairly complex workflows. My aim is to find a nice pattern/framework for building apps where each unit of work involves many panels, several forms, lots of decisions and so on. In particular I'm aiming at apps where you need to be very confident about exactly what is happening, so very strict control of actions, being careful of multiple renderings of a page each trying to change the server data, and so on. Also, I'm wondering about some options for declarative building of workflows out of existing tasks. My current design involves running from a special page, which maintains a stack of tasks. One type of task is a Workflow, which can be configured to automatically spawn subtasks as required, based on the result of previous tasks. Another type of task is based on a panel, and is able to cause itself to be rendered. The stack processor makes sure that each task is invoked at the right time, that a task can render if it is at the top of the stack, that only the top of the stack can be invoked from a form and so on. This is working ok for some silly demo cases, but there are various issues. For example, any task that is not also a component cannot access dependency injection, or set error messages and so on. I'm not sure how to get around this at the moment, as I don't want to force every task to be a component, when many will likely have no cause to ever be rendered. So, the reason I'm posting is to ask mainly two things: 1) Is this of interest to anyone else? All the code is my own, so I'll open source it if there seems to be some future in it. 2) If so, does anyone have any comments on my current design? Clearly there are problems with it, but should I carry on trying to find ways to work around them, or does the whole thing sounds like so much crack? Thanks, -- Phil Housley - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
RadioChoice and Ajax to display a panel of dropdowns
I want to create a list of radio buttons [I have that working] and an
ajax event to fire whenever a radio button is clicked [I have this
working]. If the radio button matches the one I am interested in then I
want to display additional information that must be filled in. A radio
button selection is required.
I cannot get the additional information to display when I add the
component back to the target. I think it is because the additional
information is originally set to not visible so the output markup id is
not written out. How would I go about doing this? It seems pretty
standard. Do I need to use panels and swap the appropriate panel [1 -
empty panel, 2 - panel with additional info] into the target when
needed? That seems like a lot of code to do something fairly simple.
My code is below.
Thanks.
Jeff
=
HTML:
tr
tdwicket:message key=userTypeType of
User:/wicket:message/td
td
span wicket:id=accountType
input type=radio /option 1
/span
/td
/tr
tr
td/td
tdspan wicket:id=typeBoxThe additional
information/span/td
/tr
Java Code:
// Account Type sub box
final WebMarkupContainer typeBox = new
WebMarkupContainer(typeBox);
typeBox.setVisible(false);
typeBox.setOutputMarkupId(true);
add(typeBox);
// Account Type Select
List accountTypes = accountTypeDao.findAll();
ChoiceRenderer accountTypeChoiceRenderer = new
ChoiceRenderer(name, code);
RadioChoice accountTypeRadio = new
RadioChoice(accountType, accountTypes, accountTypeChoiceRenderer);
//accountTypeRadio.setRequired(true);// THIS
SHOULD REALLY BE REQUIRED
// add the on click to the radio button
accountTypeRadio.add(new
AjaxFormChoiceComponentUpdatingBehavior () {
private static final long serialVersionUID = 1L;
@Override
protected void onUpdate(AjaxRequestTarget target) {
RadioChoice choice = (RadioChoice) getComponent();
choice.updateModel();
if (((AccountType)
choice.getModelObject()).getCode().equalsIgnoreCase(REP)) {
typeBox.setVisible(true);
} else {
typeBox.setVisible(false);
}
target.addComponent(typeBox);
}
});
___
Jeffrey A. Schneller
Envisa
End-to-End E-Commerce for the Multi-Channel Merchant
281 Pleasant Street
Framingham, MA 01701
P: (508) 405-1220 x115
C: (508) 954-8044
F: (508) 405-1219
Re: Complicated workflows
2009/9/29 Scott Swank scott.sw...@gmail.com: Phil, Would an event-centric approach simplify things? I'm thinking that you could then have multiple listeners for a given event and the various listeners would not have to be aware of one another. This might reduce the task/sub-task interactions. Adding errors, or refreshing components could be handled by various listeners as needed. I did consider that route, but one of the things I most want is to be able to embed one workflow in another, so I can reuse common tasks - hence the stack where a workflow is just like another task. Having listeners doesn't make much sense, I felt, when adding a new task/workflow to the stack temporarily hides everything underneath. Currently there really isn't much interaction between sibling tasks, when the current task says it is complete, another task is prepared, possibly showing a panel, or maybe just running and completing immediately. Events are simulated by having a task return a code, and the wiring says what transition follows each code. e.g. Task 1, on success - Task 2, on failure - Task X I've gone that route with reasonable luck. Of course I know precious little about your specific application... Really there is no specific application, I'm just trying to solve a general problem. The inspiration is my day job, for which I wrote a tiny little workflow engine, which basically just gives some help switching panels around. I'm not allowed to do a version 2 there though, so I'm doing it off my own back at home. Cheers, Scott On Tue, Sep 29, 2009 at 2:11 PM, Phil Housley undeconstruc...@gmail.com wrote: Hello list, I'm currently working on some ideas for building apps with fairly complex workflows. My aim is to find a nice pattern/framework for building apps where each unit of work involves many panels, several forms, lots of decisions and so on. In particular I'm aiming at apps where you need to be very confident about exactly what is happening, so very strict control of actions, being careful of multiple renderings of a page each trying to change the server data, and so on. Also, I'm wondering about some options for declarative building of workflows out of existing tasks. My current design involves running from a special page, which maintains a stack of tasks. One type of task is a Workflow, which can be configured to automatically spawn subtasks as required, based on the result of previous tasks. Another type of task is based on a panel, and is able to cause itself to be rendered. The stack processor makes sure that each task is invoked at the right time, that a task can render if it is at the top of the stack, that only the top of the stack can be invoked from a form and so on. This is working ok for some silly demo cases, but there are various issues. For example, any task that is not also a component cannot access dependency injection, or set error messages and so on. I'm not sure how to get around this at the moment, as I don't want to force every task to be a component, when many will likely have no cause to ever be rendered. So, the reason I'm posting is to ask mainly two things: 1) Is this of interest to anyone else? All the code is my own, so I'll open source it if there seems to be some future in it. 2) If so, does anyone have any comments on my current design? Clearly there are problems with it, but should I carry on trying to find ways to work around them, or does the whole thing sounds like so much crack? Thanks, -- Phil Housley - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org -- Phil Housley - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: Complicated workflows
there is really no point in having your tasks be components. why not simply
repeatingview rv=..
for (task t:tasks) {
if (t.hasUIComponent()) {
rv.add(t.getUIComponent());
}
}
-igor
On Tue, Sep 29, 2009 at 2:11 PM, Phil Housley undeconstruc...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello list,
I'm currently working on some ideas for building apps with fairly
complex workflows. My aim is to find a nice pattern/framework for
building apps where each unit of work involves many panels, several
forms, lots of decisions and so on. In particular I'm aiming at apps
where you need to be very confident about exactly what is happening,
so very strict control of actions, being careful of multiple
renderings of a page each trying to change the server data, and so on.
Also, I'm wondering about some options for declarative building of
workflows out of existing tasks.
My current design involves running from a special page, which
maintains a stack of tasks. One type of task is a Workflow, which can
be configured to automatically spawn subtasks as required, based on
the result of previous tasks. Another type of task is based on a
panel, and is able to cause itself to be rendered. The stack
processor makes sure that each task is invoked at the right time, that
a task can render if it is at the top of the stack, that only the top
of the stack can be invoked from a form and so on.
This is working ok for some silly demo cases, but there are various
issues. For example, any task that is not also a component cannot
access dependency injection, or set error messages and so on. I'm not
sure how to get around this at the moment, as I don't want to force
every task to be a component, when many will likely have no cause to
ever be rendered.
So, the reason I'm posting is to ask mainly two things:
1) Is this of interest to anyone else? All the code is my own, so
I'll open source it if there seems to be some future in it.
2) If so, does anyone have any comments on my current design? Clearly
there are problems with it, but should I carry on trying to find ways
to work around them, or does the whole thing sounds like so much
crack?
Thanks,
--
Phil Housley
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: Complicated workflows
Have you thought about using Spring Web Flow for this? I'm not a SWF expert, but it sounds like something well-tailored to your needs. For example, a flow can have steps that don't have UIs. Our group at work is looking into Wicket SWF integration. I have a seen a few comments on the web from folks like Peter Thomas who conclude that you don't need to use SWF with Wicket. We need to externalize the flow of some applications so we have discussed shallow integration (where, for example, a button.onClick explicitly calls SWF to determine what to do next), as well as deep(er) integration (perhaps at the RequestCycleProcessor. At the moment, we are leaning toward the shallow/lightweight integration which gives lots of flexibility to each application to respond to a flow's response in different ways (show a new page, update components via Ajax, redirect to another URL, etc.). In case anyone is interested, reasons we need to externalize flow on some apps are things like: Complex business rules, business unit authoring of flow (via a controlled UI), and delegation to a business process manager layer. On Tue, Sep 29, 2009 at 4:11 PM, Phil Housley undeconstruc...@gmail.comwrote: Hello list, I'm currently working on some ideas for building apps with fairly complex workflows. My aim is to find a nice pattern/framework for building apps where each unit of work involves many panels, several forms, lots of decisions and so on. In particular I'm aiming at apps where you need to be very confident about exactly what is happening, so very strict control of actions, being careful of multiple renderings of a page each trying to change the server data, and so on. Also, I'm wondering about some options for declarative building of workflows out of existing tasks. My current design involves running from a special page, which maintains a stack of tasks. One type of task is a Workflow, which can be configured to automatically spawn subtasks as required, based on the result of previous tasks. Another type of task is based on a panel, and is able to cause itself to be rendered. The stack processor makes sure that each task is invoked at the right time, that a task can render if it is at the top of the stack, that only the top of the stack can be invoked from a form and so on. This is working ok for some silly demo cases, but there are various issues. For example, any task that is not also a component cannot access dependency injection, or set error messages and so on. I'm not sure how to get around this at the moment, as I don't want to force every task to be a component, when many will likely have no cause to ever be rendered. So, the reason I'm posting is to ask mainly two things: 1) Is this of interest to anyone else? All the code is my own, so I'll open source it if there seems to be some future in it. 2) If so, does anyone have any comments on my current design? Clearly there are problems with it, but should I carry on trying to find ways to work around them, or does the whole thing sounds like so much crack? Thanks, -- Phil Housley - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: Question about wicket validation
So validateComponents() validates also nested components if current
form depends on them?
**
Martin
2009/9/29 Jonathan Locke jonathan.lo...@gmail.com:
protected final void validate()
{
if (isEnabledInHierarchy() isVisibleInHierarchy())
{
// since this method can be called directly by users,
this additional
check is needed
validateComponents();
validateFormValidators();
onValidate();
validateNestedForms();
}
}
MartinM wrote:
Hi!
If a form validator depends on a nested form's components, it will
assume they are valid because the nested form's components are
validated after the parent form?
**
Martin
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Question-about-wicket-validation-tp25657602p25669362.html
Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
