Re: CAS (or single sign on): how to?
A couple of implementation questions: 1) Do you use the RestartResponseAtInterceptPageException to redirect users to the cas site when the user is not logged in and the cookie is not present, or something else? 2) Do you allow loging in also through the normal sites, not using the cas? 3) Shared data store - is this a wicket/java object or just any resource(like db) that both apps have access to? 4) Did you override some of wicket session store methods to support the extraction of the id from the shared data store? 5) Session expiration -where do you add a session expiration listener? on the wicket app level or in the web.xml? Thanks a lot for the help so far. I started looking this kind of info a couple of days ago but couldn't find anything useful. I only found info about implementation using the container (tomcat) or spring-security (which i don't use). On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 12:58 AM, Dan Retzlaff dretzl...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Sam, We have a similar use case, and we use a home-grown approach within Wicket: 1. The authenticating application persists a session ID into a shared data store, and puts the ID into a new site-wide cookie. We use Wicket's Session#getId() for the ID, but could equivalently use UUID.randomUUID(). 2. When other apps' IAuthorizationStrategy detects an unauthorized/unauthenticated request, it tries to authenticate using this site-wide cookie. It basically just verifies that the session ID in the cookie corresponds to an active session in the shared data store. One thing to consider is your session expiration/logout logic. Our use case is more like user handoff than concurrent Wicket sessions, and we have a session expiration listener that invalidates the session in the shared data store from the owning application. If your use case is not so simple, then you'll have to define your own site-wide authentication expiration event(s). On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 1:55 PM, Sam Zilverberg samzilverb...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, Our base wicket app is deploy around 40-50 times on a couple of tomcats. Each instance has a different configuration but the code base is the same app. Each instance has its own context and it looks something like this: app a : baseurl/a app baba: baseurl/baba Currently the authentication and authorization for each site is handled by the wicket app assigned to that context. We implemented IAuhorizationStrategy and are using the signin page from the examples + captcha after a couple of tries. We want an app at baseurl/login that will take care of loging in instead of all the different apps doing it for themselves. Whats the best way to implement such a CAS mechanism? (preferably using wicket, spring is ok too) Thanks, Sam.
Re: refresh and AjaxFallbackDefaultDataTable
Hi, in Ajax requests the page id is not incremented, to keep the page version in the browser's url in sync with the state on the server. When the page is refreshed (F5), the following happens: - WebPageRenderer#respond() checks whether the url has changed, which it has not yet. So no redirect seems necessary. - while rendering (more correctly in onBeforeRender()) the DataView removes all its children, thus resulting in a version increment - all links render itself with the new page version Thus the browser still shows the old version in the URL. But all future Ajax requests are targetting a different page version than visible in the browser URL :(. Sven Am 13.02.2012 20:13, schrieb Jonathan Tougas: I'm getting some inconsistent behavior with AjaxFallbackDefaultDataTable. Here are two scenarios that can be run on wicket-examples: *Scenario 1* 1 - navigate to http://wicketstuff.org/wicket/repeater/wicket/bookmarkable/org.apache.wicket.examples.repeater.AjaxDataTablePage 2 - click the link to navigate to page 2 3 - refresh (F5) After the page refresh, you're still on page 2 - as expected *Scenario 2:* 1 - navigate to http://wicketstuff.org/wicket/repeater/wicket/bookmarkable/org.apache.wicket.examples.repeater.AjaxDataTablePage 2 - refresh (F5) 3 - click the link to navigate to results page 2 4 - refresh (F5) After the page refresh you're back to page 1 - oops The navigation links work fine until the page is refreshed. After a page refresh the navigation links point to the wrong page version (or so it seems), so refreshing a second time doesn't work as expected. I'm fairly new to Wicket so I may be missing something, and I haven't found a bug report for this. Can someone confirm or explain what Im not getting please? Cheers! - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Link URLs (with JSessionID) truncated during URL rewriting
Hello All, Has anyone else apart from me suffered from this problem of URLs being truncated to become invalid? I would appreciate it if anyone else shared my pain! Ian Marshall Ian Marshall wrote Hello All, A user's first visit to my app's home page results in the URL http://[My domain]/main/PageHome;jsessionid=v_qqIGVQlKBbkNSOcHkAQw?0 Each org.apache.wicket.markup.html.link.Link on my home page has the URL of the form http://[My domain]/main/..;jsessionid=v_qqIGVQlKBbkNSOcHkAQw?0-1.ILinkListener-lnkAbout (of length 102 characters for the particular link URL copied here). These URLs are invalid, because of the two dots present instead of the completed path. Is there any way I can configure Wicket to suppress this URL abbreviation, or is this operation the province of the web application server or web browser? As a work-around, I have already coded the supression of JSessionIDs in my links' URLs, and am coding the app to give a warning if session cookies are disabled. But I would appreciate any pointers. Ian Marshall My operating environment - Web application server: (Jetty? in) Google App Engine Wicket version: 1.5.3 (I know: it's not the very latest version!) Web browsers: Mozilla Firefox 10.0.1 Microsoft Internet Explorer 8.0.6001.18702 as found on my HTC Wildfire S running Google Android 2.3.5 -- View this message in context: http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/Link-URLs-with-JSessionID-truncated-tp4381881p4386619.html Sent from the Users forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
RE: jQuery form validation with wicket ajax
Thanks for that link! I never managed to work out how to get jquery events to
override the buttons onClick attribute. This should simplify our validation
code a lot.
Paul
-Original Message-
From: Alec Swan [mailto:alecs...@gmail.com]
Sent: 13 February 2012 16:38
To: users@wicket.apache.org
Subject: Re: jQuery form validation with wicket ajax
This thread describes a purely client-side solution to your problem:
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/1506729/how-to-intercept-the-onclick-event.
You can solve this problem for all you AJAX links by assigning them a special
class, e.g. class=ajaxLink, and then apply the technique to $(form
.ajaxLink).
On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 3:55 AM, Paul Jackson paul.jack...@cdl.co.uk wrote:
We use an OnBeforeRenderListener to add onClick events to the buttons and
ajax buttons on a form that we want to be validated. We have to handle the
normal buttons and ajax buttons slightly differently.
Ajax button:
button.add(new AttributeModifier(onclick, new
ModelString(if (! $('# + formMarkupId
+ ').validate().form()) {return false};)) {
Normal Button:
button.add(new WiQueryEventBehavior(new
Event(MouseEvent.CLICK) {
@Override
public JsScope callback() {
return JsScope.quickScope(return $('# +
formMarkupId + ').validate().form(););
}
}));
Hope that helps.
Paul
-Original Message-
From: Gerrit Scholz | QUERPLEX.de [mailto:gerrit.sch...@querplex.de]
Sent: 13 February 2012 10:18
To: users@wicket.apache.org
Subject: jQuery form validation with wicket ajax
Hello there,
I try to use jQuery validaton (http://docs.jquery.com/Plugins/Validation)
with a wicket AJAX button. I register the jQuery validator on the form. If I
use a normal wicket submit button or link, the jQuery form validation works.
But if I use an AJAX button or link, the jQuery form validation is not
called. How can I call the jQuery validation before AJAX update.
Thanks,
Gerrit
--
- QUERPLEX GmbH Nürnberg | www.querplex.de Kornmarkt 2
D-90402 Nürnberg
--
-
Tel +49 (0)911 94 11 98 - 0
Fax +49 (0)911 94 11 98 - 59
--
-
Registergericht Nürnberg HRB 20 123
Geschäftsführerin: Angelika Benkert
--
-
**
Please consider the environment - do you really need to print this email?
This email is intended only for the person(s) named above and may contain
private and confidential information. If it has come to you in error, please
destroy and permanently delete any copy in your possession and contact us on
+44 (0) 161 480 4420. The information in this email is copyright © CDL Group
Holdings Limited. We cannot accept any liability for any loss or damage
sustained as a result of software viruses. It is your responsibility to carry
out such virus checking as is necessary before opening any attachment.
Cheshire Datasystems Limited uses software which automatically screens
incoming emails for inappropriate content and attachments. If the software
identifies such content or attachment, the email will be forwarded to our
Technology Department for checking. You should be aware that any email which
you send to Cheshire Datasystems Limited is subject to this procedure.
Cheshire Datasystems Limited, Strata House, Kings Reach Road,
Stockport SK4 2HD Registered in England and Wales with Company Number
3991057 VAT registration: 727 1188 33
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: 1.5.4: Rather curious case of the IInitializer List
Hi Richard, you're right, this implementation looks 'curious' but it was intentional. Note the javadoc of Collection.unmodifiableList(): 'Query operations on the returned list read through to the specified list' Sven Am 13.02.2012 23:58, schrieb richard emberson: While looking at the extensions code, I noted that in the 1.5.4 InitializerStringResourceLoader constructor that the list of IInitializer is empty but in the InitializerStringResourceLoader loadStringResource method there are two initializers in that same IInitializer list. So, how can this be? Well, in Application, first the initializers list is wrapped in a Collections.unmodifiableList and returned by the Application getInitializers method. This is called when creating an instance of the InitializerStringResourceLoader. Later, the Application load(properties) method is called which, in turn, calls addInitializer twice which adds two IInitializer to the Application's initializers list. Now, the InitializerStringResourceLoader loadStringResource is called and, behold, the InitializerStringResourceLoader IInitializer list now has two members. It seems that, under the covers, Application and InitializerStringResourceLoader share the same IInitializer list!!! This sharing is, well, not documented, rather, its depends upon the implementation of Collections.unmodifiableList. So, I don't wish to criticize; maybe this was the intent; maybe its very clever; but for me its, well, curious. Richard - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Last cause: $Proxy153 cannot be cast to org.omg.CORBA.Object
Hello All, I have a Wicket application on the JBoss-4.2.2 GA server. User visits the link: https://name_of_host.com:8443/webform/?code=c30bd05e-da65-45ab-9217-fcb72969 1138 And receive the error message in the browser: == Unexpected RuntimeException Last cause: $Proxy153 cannot be cast to org.omg.CORBA.Object WicketMessage: Can't instantiate page using constructor 'public de.connectodent.HomePage(org.apache.wicket.request.mapper.parameter.PagePara meters)' at . Stacktrace Root cause: java.lang.ClassCastException: $Proxy153 cannot be cast to org.omg.CORBA.Object at com.sun.corba.se.impl.javax.rmi.PortableRemoteObject.narrow(PortableRemoteOb ject.java:212) at javax.rmi.PortableRemoteObject.narrow(PortableRemoteObject.java:131) at de.connectodent.server.ConnectToServer.lookupHandlers(ConnectToServer.java:5 12) ... == Immediately after pressing the browser's Refresh button - this message disappears and the application works fine. I see this error the same in FireFox and in Opera. Please prompt how to avoid the appearance of this message? Thanks, Ivan
Re: Problem with date format on changing locale
I actually want to know if I can set date format. I want to set it after submit. There is #forDatePattern(...) but this can be used at page initialization, instead of constructor. Thnaks. -- View this message in context: http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/Problem-with-date-format-on-changing-locale-tp4383834p4386555.html Sent from the Users forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: modal window takes very long time to close
This is what I was trying to find: http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/wicket-users/200904.mbox/%3ca737c1240904170336h2231a4aej48e6f3ec783bd...@mail.gmail.com%3E On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 11:08 AM, fachhoch fachh...@gmail.com wrote: any help with this , My modal window is taking too long to close. -- View this message in context: http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/modal-window-takes-very-long-time-to-close-tp4377803p4384240.html Sent from the Users forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
RE: refresh and AjaxFallbackDefaultDataTable
Thus the browser still shows the old version in the URL. But all future Ajax requests are targetting a different page version than visible in the browser URL :(. Can't you fix that with a getPage().dirty(); in the Ajax request handler? - Tor Iver - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Wicket 1.5 and JSP/servlet wrapping
Hi!
In the project I'm on we want to upgrade from Wicket 1.4 to 1.5 (1.5.4) and
one major thing is not working yet.
There's a need to wrap old JSP/servlets into the new Wicket based
application and the old 1.4-approach is not working anymore.
Simplified html output in 1.4
body
div id=container
wrappedContentFromJsp
/div
body
Simplified html output in 1.5
body
wrappedContentFromJsp
div id=container
/div
body
So, all the JSP content renders outside the tag that we like to wrap it in.
The wrapping magic happens in our internal AbstractServletWrapperPanel and
the WebMarkupContainer.onRender(MarkupStream markupStream) override.
However, in Wicket 1.5 we can't invoke markupStream.next() since it's no
longer provided. I have not found a way around this yet.
Working code for 1.4 with a sample panel implementation as reference:
public abstract class AbstractServletWrapperPanel extends Panel {
public AbstractServletWrapperPanel(String id, final String
servletName, String tagId) {
super(id);
add(new WebMarkupContainer(tagId) {
@Override
protected void onRender(MarkupStream markupStream) {
markupStream.next();
try {
WebRequestCycle cycle = (WebRequestCycle) RequestCycle.get();
ServletRequest request =
cycle.getWebRequest().getHttpServletRequest();
ServletResponse response =
cycle.getWebResponse().getHttpServletResponse();
ServletContext context = ((WebApplication)
Application.get()).getServletContext();
RequestDispatcher rd = context.getNamedDispatcher(servletName);
if (rd != null) {
rd.include(request, response);
} else {
// handling...
}
} catch (Exception e) {
// handling...
}
}
});
}
}
//Impl
public class WrapperPanel extends AbstractServletWrapperPanel {
private static final long serialVersionUID = 1L;
public WrapperPanel(String id, final String servletName) {
super(id, servletName, wrappedContentId);
}
}
//WrapperPanel html
body
wicket:panel
wicket:container wicket:id=wrappedContentId/
/wicket:panel
/body
In the 1.5 version I'm getting the request and response via
* (HttpServletRequest)RequestCycle.get().getRequest().getContainerRequest()
*
(HttpServletResponse)RequestCycle.get().getResponse().getContainerResponse()
Then I've tried to:
* use the onRender()-magic without markupStream.next() that's no longer
provided in 1.5
* move it to onComponentTagBody(MarkupStream markupStream, ComponentTag
tag)
* Note: To invoke onComponentTagBody() I had to open up the container tag
wicket:container/wicket:container.
* I also tried without invoking markupStream.next() as that step is
performed in Component.internalRenderComponent() just before
onComponentTagBody is invoked at all.
* move it to onComponentTag(ComponentTag tag)
* combined above with setting setRenderBodyOnly(true) in the
WebMarkupContatiner.onInitialize()
* use a div tag instead of a wicket:container
* use debug mode to track down the rendering process of 1.5. But still, I
guess I'm missing out some key part of the new 1.5 way of rendering
components.
* invoke getAssociatedMarkupStream() from onRender() but that raises the
following error
* org.apache.wicket.markup.MarkupNotFoundException: Markup of type 'html'
for component '... AbstractServletWrapperPanel$1' not found.
Since it's not an option to migrate all that JSP functionality to Wicket
anytime soon this is kind of a showstopper for us at the moment.
For reference, the 1.4 way of doing this is much similar to the approach I
found in the article
http://herebebeasties.com/2007-03-01/jsp-and-wicket-sitting-in-a-tree/
I also posted this question on SO,
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/9257706/wicket-1-5-and-jsp-servlet-wrapping
Any help solving this issue would be very appreciated!
Thanks,
Johan
SpringComponentInjector and non null fields
Hi, I just realized painfully, that SpringComponentInjector only injects Beans, when the Fields are non-null. Is there a reason for this Behavior? The Reason I ask is, we use the SpringComponentInjector in all our Tests to inject Mocks with Injector.get().inject(this). This only works, if we set all Mocks to null in tearDown. No problem so far, but this is surely not a typical use case, but nonetheless, I would like to know if this is desired, and if we could propably allow to configure this behavior (as a flag or whatever?). Just for me to understand this better. Thanks Martin -- View this message in context: http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/SpringComponentInjector-and-non-null-fields-tp4386918p4386918.html Sent from the Users forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: Header contribution from a component resolved via an IComponentResolver
Hi,
auto-components are added to the component tree not until rendering of
markup, this is too late for header contributions.
Sven
Am 14.02.2012 07:33, schrieb Chris Colman:
Added a JIRA for this:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-4408
If I explicitly add the component to the parent it works but I can't do
this in our app.
From: Chris Colman [mailto:chr...@stepaheadsoftware.com]
Sent: Tuesday, 14 February 2012 4:11 PM
To: users@wicket.apache.org
Subject: Header contribution from a component resolved via an
IComponentResolver
Is header contribution meant to work when a component is not added
directly but added but added via an IComponentResolver?
I have component and have added a renderHead override:
Class MyComponent extends Panel
{
/**
* Write out necessary header markup.
*/
@Override
public void renderHead(IHeaderResponse response)
{
StringBuffer sb = new StringBuffer();
sb.append(script src=\/jquery.easing.1.3.min.js\/script);
sb.append(script src=\/trans-banner.min.js\/script);
response.renderString(sb.toString());
}
}
But this method is never called. Is header contribution meant to work
this easily or am I missing something?
Using latest 1.5.x snapshot.
Yours sincerely,
Chris Colman
Pagebloom Team Leader,
Step Ahead Software
pagebloom - your business your website growing together
Sydney: (+61 2) 9656 1278 Canberra: (+61 2) 6100 2120
Email: chr...@stepahead.com.aumailto://chr...@stepahead.com.au
Website:
http://www.pagebloom.comblocked::http://www.pagebloom.com/
http://develop.stepaheadsoftware.com
blocked::http://develop.stepaheadsoftware.com/
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: SpringComponentInjector and non null fields
There is a remark on this here: https://cwiki.apache.org/WICKET/spring.html When doing this it is important to remember not to initialize dependencies, to null or any other value, e.g.private ContactDao dao=null;. Don't do this because the injector will run before the subclass initializes its fields, and so the dao=null will override the created proxy with null. Robert Am 14.02.2012 13:58, schrieb martin.dilger: Hi, I just realized painfully, that SpringComponentInjector only injects Beans, when the Fields are non-null. Is there a reason for this Behavior? The Reason I ask is, we use the SpringComponentInjector in all our Tests to inject Mocks with Injector.get().inject(this). This only works, if we set all Mocks to null in tearDown. No problem so far, but this is surely not a typical use case, but nonetheless, I would like to know if this is desired, and if we could propably allow to configure this behavior (as a flag or whatever?). Just for me to understand this better. Thanks Martin -- View this message in context: http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/SpringComponentInjector-and-non-null-fields-tp4386918p4386918.html Sent from the Users forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
AW: jQuery form validation with wicket ajax
If I intercept the onclick event my function is called but the processing not
stop. Mean that the wicket (onclick) javascript is running parallel.
So I write a AttributeModifier that prepends my function to the onclick
attribute. Now the validation works fine, but on the onSubmit method of the
wicket ajax button the AjaxRequestTarget is null so the component to refresh
cannot be added.
Gerrit
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Paul Jackson [mailto:paul.jack...@cdl.co.uk]
Gesendet: Dienstag, 14. Februar 2012 10:38
An: users@wicket.apache.org
Betreff: RE: jQuery form validation with wicket ajax
Thanks for that link! I never managed to work out how to get jquery events to
override the buttons onClick attribute. This should simplify our validation
code a lot.
Paul
-Original Message-
From: Alec Swan [mailto:alecs...@gmail.com]
Sent: 13 February 2012 16:38
To: users@wicket.apache.org
Subject: Re: jQuery form validation with wicket ajax
This thread describes a purely client-side solution to your problem:
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/1506729/how-to-intercept-the-onclick-event.
You can solve this problem for all you AJAX links by assigning them a special
class, e.g. class=ajaxLink, and then apply the technique to $(form
.ajaxLink).
On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 3:55 AM, Paul Jackson paul.jack...@cdl.co.uk wrote:
We use an OnBeforeRenderListener to add onClick events to the buttons and
ajax buttons on a form that we want to be validated. We have to handle the
normal buttons and ajax buttons slightly differently.
Ajax button:
button.add(new AttributeModifier(onclick, new
ModelString(if (! $('# + formMarkupId
+ ').validate().form()) {return false};)) {
Normal Button:
button.add(new WiQueryEventBehavior(new
Event(MouseEvent.CLICK) {
@Override
public JsScope callback() {
return JsScope.quickScope(return $('# +
formMarkupId + ').validate().form(););
}
}));
Hope that helps.
Paul
-Original Message-
From: Gerrit Scholz | QUERPLEX.de [mailto:gerrit.sch...@querplex.de]
Sent: 13 February 2012 10:18
To: users@wicket.apache.org
Subject: jQuery form validation with wicket ajax
Hello there,
I try to use jQuery validaton (http://docs.jquery.com/Plugins/Validation)
with a wicket AJAX button. I register the jQuery validator on the form. If I
use a normal wicket submit button or link, the jQuery form validation works.
But if I use an AJAX button or link, the jQuery form validation is not
called. How can I call the jQuery validation before AJAX update.
Thanks,
Gerrit
--
- QUERPLEX GmbH Nürnberg | www.querplex.de Kornmarkt 2
D-90402 Nürnberg
--
-
Tel +49 (0)911 94 11 98 - 0
Fax +49 (0)911 94 11 98 - 59
--
-
Registergericht Nürnberg HRB 20 123
Geschäftsführerin: Angelika Benkert
--
-
**
Please consider the environment - do you really need to print this email?
This email is intended only for the person(s) named above and may contain
private and confidential information. If it has come to you in error, please
destroy and permanently delete any copy in your possession and contact us on
+44 (0) 161 480 4420. The information in this email is copyright © CDL Group
Holdings Limited. We cannot accept any liability for any loss or damage
sustained as a result of software viruses. It is your responsibility to carry
out such virus checking as is necessary before opening any attachment.
Cheshire Datasystems Limited uses software which automatically screens
incoming emails for inappropriate content and attachments. If the software
identifies such content or attachment, the email will be forwarded to our
Technology Department for checking. You should be aware that any email which
you send to Cheshire Datasystems Limited is subject to this procedure.
Cheshire Datasystems Limited, Strata House, Kings Reach Road,
Stockport SK4 2HD Registered in England and Wales with Company Number
3991057 VAT registration: 727 1188 33
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
---
QUERPLEX GmbH Nürnberg | www.querplex.de
Kornmarkt 2
D-90402 Nürnberg
Re: 1.5.4: Rather curious case of the IInitializer List
Since the intent is to access the latest snapshot of the Application IInitializer list, why not simply have the InitializerStringResourceLoader loadStringResource method call Application.get().getInitializers(). I would suggest that it is cleaner. And, yes, I know that Java's unmodifiableList is a flawed attempt at having a cheap mutable to immutable transformation. Sadly, its the best Java standard library can offer. Richard On 02/14/2012 01:19 AM, Sven Meier wrote: Hi Richard, you're right, this implementation looks 'curious' but it was intentional. Note the javadoc of Collection.unmodifiableList(): 'Query operations on the returned list read through to the specified list' Sven Am 13.02.2012 23:58, schrieb richard emberson: While looking at the extensions code, I noted that in the 1.5.4 InitializerStringResourceLoader constructor that the list of IInitializer is empty but in the InitializerStringResourceLoader loadStringResource method there are two initializers in that same IInitializer list. So, how can this be? Well, in Application, first the initializers list is wrapped in a Collections.unmodifiableList and returned by the Application getInitializers method. This is called when creating an instance of the InitializerStringResourceLoader. Later, the Application load(properties) method is called which, in turn, calls addInitializer twice which adds two IInitializer to the Application's initializers list. Now, the InitializerStringResourceLoader loadStringResource is called and, behold, the InitializerStringResourceLoader IInitializer list now has two members. It seems that, under the covers, Application and InitializerStringResourceLoader share the same IInitializer list!!! This sharing is, well, not documented, rather, its depends upon the implementation of Collections.unmodifiableList. So, I don't wish to criticize; maybe this was the intent; maybe its very clever; but for me its, well, curious. Richard - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org -- Quis custodiet ipsos custodes - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: replaceOuterHtmlSafari not working proerly
file this in our jira so it doesnt get lost
-igor
On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 9:56 PM, pmaks piyu...@live.com wrote:
Hi All,
Please have a look at below images
before form submit
http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/file/n4386241/before-submit.png
after form submit (it shows the feedback panel for required fields error),
notice form is missing.
http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/file/n4386241/after-submit.png
Probelm is element on which outerHTML is called is removed from DOM.
I debug a bit and doubt source of the problem is following function in
wicket-ajax.js.
Wicket.replaceOuterHtmlSafari = function(element, text) {
…
element.outerHTML = text; // not working properly on chrome
safari
.
}
Is this a known issue on safari/chrome, is there any workaround for this.
Thanks
--
View this message in context:
http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/replaceOuterHtmlSafari-not-working-proerly-tp4383380p4386241.html
Sent from the Users forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: SpringComponentInjector and non null fields
Hi,
thanks, this is true, but I dont think this is the Point I refer to, since I
call Injector.get().inject(this) in our Test, so I explicitely request
SpringBean-injection.
The Problem is this Line in Class Injector:
if (field.get(object) == null)
{
Object value =
factory.getFieldValue(field, object);
if (value != null)
{
field.set(object, value);
}
}
Injection only happens, if the Field is non-null.
I can not think of any use-case why this is?
Any comments?
Thanks in advance!
--
View this message in context:
http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/SpringComponentInjector-and-non-null-fields-tp4386918p4387511.html
Sent from the Users forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: 1.5.4: Rather curious case of the IInitializer List
I'd rather have an InitializerCollection (similar to other wicket *Collection classes). This could safely be passed around. Sven Am 14.02.2012 15:11, schrieb richard emberson: Since the intent is to access the latest snapshot of the Application IInitializer list, why not simply have the InitializerStringResourceLoader loadStringResource method call Application.get().getInitializers(). I would suggest that it is cleaner. And, yes, I know that Java's unmodifiableList is a flawed attempt at having a cheap mutable to immutable transformation. Sadly, its the best Java standard library can offer. Richard On 02/14/2012 01:19 AM, Sven Meier wrote: Hi Richard, you're right, this implementation looks 'curious' but it was intentional. Note the javadoc of Collection.unmodifiableList(): 'Query operations on the returned list read through to the specified list' Sven Am 13.02.2012 23:58, schrieb richard emberson: While looking at the extensions code, I noted that in the 1.5.4 InitializerStringResourceLoader constructor that the list of IInitializer is empty but in the InitializerStringResourceLoader loadStringResource method there are two initializers in that same IInitializer list. So, how can this be? Well, in Application, first the initializers list is wrapped in a Collections.unmodifiableList and returned by the Application getInitializers method. This is called when creating an instance of the InitializerStringResourceLoader. Later, the Application load(properties) method is called which, in turn, calls addInitializer twice which adds two IInitializer to the Application's initializers list. Now, the InitializerStringResourceLoader loadStringResource is called and, behold, the InitializerStringResourceLoader IInitializer list now has two members. It seems that, under the covers, Application and InitializerStringResourceLoader share the same IInitializer list!!! This sharing is, well, not documented, rather, its depends upon the implementation of Collections.unmodifiableList. So, I don't wish to criticize; maybe this was the intent; maybe its very clever; but for me its, well, curious. Richard - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: SpringComponentInjector and non null fields
that is there to give users a chance at test time to override
injection partially, as in
component c=new mycomponent();
c.service1=mock(service.class);
injector.inject(c);
injector will inject everything but service1. key here is to make sure
service doesnt have to be defined in the test's spring context.
-igor
On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 8:08 AM, martin.dilger
martin.dil...@googlemail.com wrote:
Hi,
thanks, this is true, but I dont think this is the Point I refer to, since I
call Injector.get().inject(this) in our Test, so I explicitely request
SpringBean-injection.
The Problem is this Line in Class Injector:
if (field.get(object) == null)
{
Object value =
factory.getFieldValue(field, object);
if (value != null)
{
field.set(object, value);
}
}
Injection only happens, if the Field is non-null.
I can not think of any use-case why this is?
Any comments?
Thanks in advance!
--
View this message in context:
http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/SpringComponentInjector-and-non-null-fields-tp4386918p4387511.html
Sent from the Users forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: SpringComponentInjector and non null fields
ok, understood, thanks. -- View this message in context: http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/SpringComponentInjector-and-non-null-fields-tp4386918p4387545.html Sent from the Users forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: jQuery form validation with wicket ajax
Are you saying that AjaxRequestTarget is not null without your onclick
attribute changes and is null with your changes? If so, please post
the changes you made to onclick attribute.
On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 7:06 AM, Gerrit Scholz | QUERPLEX.de
gerrit.sch...@querplex.de wrote:
If I intercept the onclick event my function is called but the processing not
stop. Mean that the wicket (onclick) javascript is running parallel.
So I write a AttributeModifier that prepends my function to the onclick
attribute. Now the validation works fine, but on the onSubmit method of the
wicket ajax button the AjaxRequestTarget is null so the component to refresh
cannot be added.
Gerrit
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Paul Jackson [mailto:paul.jack...@cdl.co.uk]
Gesendet: Dienstag, 14. Februar 2012 10:38
An: users@wicket.apache.org
Betreff: RE: jQuery form validation with wicket ajax
Thanks for that link! I never managed to work out how to get jquery events to
override the buttons onClick attribute. This should simplify our validation
code a lot.
Paul
-Original Message-
From: Alec Swan [mailto:alecs...@gmail.com]
Sent: 13 February 2012 16:38
To: users@wicket.apache.org
Subject: Re: jQuery form validation with wicket ajax
This thread describes a purely client-side solution to your problem:
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/1506729/how-to-intercept-the-onclick-event.
You can solve this problem for all you AJAX links by assigning them a special
class, e.g. class=ajaxLink, and then apply the technique to $(form
.ajaxLink).
On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 3:55 AM, Paul Jackson paul.jack...@cdl.co.uk wrote:
We use an OnBeforeRenderListener to add onClick events to the buttons and
ajax buttons on a form that we want to be validated. We have to handle the
normal buttons and ajax buttons slightly differently.
Ajax button:
button.add(new AttributeModifier(onclick, new
ModelString(if (! $('# + formMarkupId
+ ').validate().form()) {return false};)) {
Normal Button:
button.add(new WiQueryEventBehavior(new
Event(MouseEvent.CLICK) {
@Override
public JsScope callback() {
return JsScope.quickScope(return $('# +
formMarkupId + ').validate().form(););
}
}));
Hope that helps.
Paul
-Original Message-
From: Gerrit Scholz | QUERPLEX.de [mailto:gerrit.sch...@querplex.de]
Sent: 13 February 2012 10:18
To: users@wicket.apache.org
Subject: jQuery form validation with wicket ajax
Hello there,
I try to use jQuery validaton (http://docs.jquery.com/Plugins/Validation)
with a wicket AJAX button. I register the jQuery validator on the form. If I
use a normal wicket submit button or link, the jQuery form validation works.
But if I use an AJAX button or link, the jQuery form validation is not
called. How can I call the jQuery validation before AJAX update.
Thanks,
Gerrit
--
- QUERPLEX GmbH Nürnberg | www.querplex.de Kornmarkt 2
D-90402 Nürnberg
--
-
Tel +49 (0)911 94 11 98 - 0
Fax +49 (0)911 94 11 98 - 59
--
-
Registergericht Nürnberg HRB 20 123
Geschäftsführerin: Angelika Benkert
--
-
**
Please consider the environment - do you really need to print this email?
This email is intended only for the person(s) named above and may contain
private and confidential information. If it has come to you in error, please
destroy and permanently delete any copy in your possession and contact us on
+44 (0) 161 480 4420. The information in this email is copyright © CDL Group
Holdings Limited. We cannot accept any liability for any loss or damage
sustained as a result of software viruses. It is your responsibility to
carry out such virus checking as is necessary before opening any attachment.
Cheshire Datasystems Limited uses software which automatically screens
incoming emails for inappropriate content and attachments. If the software
identifies such content or attachment, the email will be forwarded to our
Technology Department for checking. You should be aware that any email which
you send to Cheshire Datasystems Limited is subject to this procedure.
Cheshire Datasystems Limited, Strata House, Kings Reach Road,
Stockport SK4 2HD Registered in England and Wales with Company Number
3991057 VAT registration: 727 1188 33
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: refresh and AjaxFallbackDefaultDataTable
Can't you fix that with a getPage().dirty(); in the Ajax request handler? Hmm tried your suggestion, but no luck. How would it help anyway? It's dirty() that is causing the page to change version in the first place right? RefreshingView.onPopulate() - MarkupContainer.removeAll() - Component.addStateChange() - Page.componentStateChanging() - Page.dirty() - new version number! I did find a fix for this though. Changing the rendering strategy from the default REDIRECT_TO_BUFFER to ONE_PASS_RENDER. With this strategy, the initial request is not redirect to *?%version%*, which means when the user presses refresh, a new page is recreated from scratch every time. Ajax updates are applied on the version of the page that originally rendered them, so there's no ambiguity like the scenario I describe. The drawback of course is that page refreshes lose ajax updates, but the semantic in that case at least is very clear and it's what I expected in the first place. On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 7:32 AM, Wilhelmsen Tor Iver toriv...@arrive.nowrote: Thus the browser still shows the old version in the URL. But all future Ajax requests are targetting a different page version than visible in the browser URL :(. Can't you fix that with a getPage().dirty(); in the Ajax request handler? - Tor Iver - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: CAS (or single sign on): how to?
Hi, Sam. Responses inline. On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 12:07 AM, Sam Zilverberg samzilverb...@gmail.comwrote: 1) Do you use the RestartResponseAtInterceptPageException to redirect users to the cas site when the user is not logged in and the cookie is not present, or something else? 2) Do you allow loging in also through the normal sites, not using the cas? We do not have a single authentication application; each application has the ability to authenticate the user and create the site-wide cookie. That said, yes, we use RestartResponseAtInterceptPage in that situation. 3) Shared data store - is this a wicket/java object or just any resource(like db) that both apps have access to? We use a relational database. I intentionally left my statement vague, though, since depending on your deployment there are multiple viable approaches to sharing the set of active sessions. 4) Did you override some of wicket session store methods to support the extraction of the id from the shared data store? I assume you mean id *for* the shared data store, and no it's just o.a.w.Session.get().getId() which is public. I don't know why we selected that unique ID though; it's really arbitrary. 5) Session expiration -where do you add a session expiration listener? on the wicket app level or in the web.xml? We use web.xml. The only reason ISessionStore#registerUnboundListener() didn't work is because we needed to grab something out of the underlying HttpSession which isn't exposed to UnboundListeners. But that requirement is unique to our app. For further context, we use this to allow customization of our application on a client-by-client basis. Most of our clients use our generic app, but we can extend the app with custom development for larger/paying clients while minimizing impact to shared functionality. These clients can authenticate from the generic login page, and then get HTTP redirected and immediately logged into their custom app. Hope that helps! Dan On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 12:58 AM, Dan Retzlaff dretzl...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Sam, We have a similar use case, and we use a home-grown approach within Wicket: 1. The authenticating application persists a session ID into a shared data store, and puts the ID into a new site-wide cookie. We use Wicket's Session#getId() for the ID, but could equivalently use UUID.randomUUID(). 2. When other apps' IAuthorizationStrategy detects an unauthorized/unauthenticated request, it tries to authenticate using this site-wide cookie. It basically just verifies that the session ID in the cookie corresponds to an active session in the shared data store. One thing to consider is your session expiration/logout logic. Our use case is more like user handoff than concurrent Wicket sessions, and we have a session expiration listener that invalidates the session in the shared data store from the owning application. If your use case is not so simple, then you'll have to define your own site-wide authentication expiration event(s). On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 1:55 PM, Sam Zilverberg samzilverb...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, Our base wicket app is deploy around 40-50 times on a couple of tomcats. Each instance has a different configuration but the code base is the same app. Each instance has its own context and it looks something like this: app a : baseurl/a app baba: baseurl/baba Currently the authentication and authorization for each site is handled by the wicket app assigned to that context. We implemented IAuhorizationStrategy and are using the signin page from the examples + captcha after a couple of tries. We want an app at baseurl/login that will take care of loging in instead of all the different apps doing it for themselves. Whats the best way to implement such a CAS mechanism? (preferably using wicket, spring is ok too) Thanks, Sam.
