Re: Migration to wicket 1.5 and properties.xml files
You can use a custom IPropertiesFactory or adjust the default one, see PropertiesFactory#getPropertiesLoaders(). Sven On 04/30/2012 07:44 AM, jensiator wrote: Hi everyone. I'm late out with migration. And I have a problem. We got a big system using wicket. The .xml change to .properties.xml could be painful. I could just rename all xml files so I can reach the pages to check if some migration features has been successful. But the check on the migration might take some time and this is a big project. I would like to be at update with the rest of the code on the project and I have bad experience with SVN and renamed files. Is it anyway to make wicket 1.5 load the old *.xml property files? Only temporarily. Jens -- View this message in context: http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/Migration-to-wicket-1-5-and-properties-xml-files-tp4597473.html Sent from the Users forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Setting value to object when validation failed
Hello this is quick start project which reproduces my case http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/file/n4597599/project.zip project.zip The problem is, that I cannot set value for object after form validation fails. How to reproduce: 1. Startup my quicstart app; 2. Do not fill required field and press Save; 4. Validation error occurs, that field is required; 3. Press Set name; (this should set first name to John Doe and refresh); Expected result: input field sets to John Doe; Actual result: nothing happens; Does anyone knows what I am doing wrong? :) -- View this message in context: http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/Setting-value-to-object-when-validation-failed-tp4597599.html Sent from the Users forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Elephas Blog Engine: how to setup a test repo
This weekend I had a look into the wicket based Elephas Blog Engine (http://code.google.com/p/elephas/). I updated it to the latest stable 1.4.20 version and tried to fire it up with the included StartElephas class. After fixing some missing properties-file and defining JCR credentials I got stuck because of not having a jackrabbit repository (repository.xml) at the (by me) defined location. I just wanted to fire up and see how the blog looks like. So how to get an empty Blog up and running? How to create a new blog with users? Can it be run without a jackrabbit repository with some flatfiles or just database? The last commits were 2008, so I am aware of it being not so wide spreaded. But I hope that some guys who worked on it are still around here... ;-) -- View this message in context: http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/Elephas-Blog-Engine-how-to-setup-a-test-repo-tp4597689.html Sent from the Users forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: Elephas Blog Engine: how to setup a test repo
I believe that this is not the right place to ask for Elephas engine howto :) This discussion board is for Elephas http://groups.google.com/group/elephas http://groups.google.com/group/elephas :D -- View this message in context: http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/Elephas-Blog-Engine-how-to-setup-a-test-repo-tp4597689p4597714.html Sent from the Users forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
call onsubmit automatically
Hi, I want to POST some data to a URL which internally redirects to a Page based on the POSTed params, for this I'm trying to do auto form submission but how to do it in wicket 1.4 or if you know other way which suits my requirement please let me know. In javascript, we can do like this , but how to do it wicket 1.4. Please suggest. /head body onload=submitTheForm(); -- View this message in context: http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/call-onsubmit-automatically-tp4597765.html Sent from the Users forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: call onsubmit automatically
If you are have a Form (a wicket one) inside a Page, then you can do your 'submitTheForm()', because a simple 'submit()' suffice to post the form. If your 'page' parameter you want to retrieve is bound to an Wicket FormComponent (even an HiddenField), then you can retrieve it server side and do a setResponsePage; you just have to get the right Page class from the param and maybe construct your PageParameters also... Hope this helps, Sebastien.
Re: call onsubmit automatically
Thnx for the reply sebastian, but I didn't get the solution what you suggested..Can you please explain it with an example? thanks in advance -- View this message in context: http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/call-onsubmit-automatically-tp4597765p4597836.html Sent from the Users forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: Elephas Blog Engine: how to setup a test repo
I had s look to the group there, there is only spam entries So I guess I will have no luck there Anybody else willing to help? -- Diese Nachricht wurde von meinem Android-Mobiltelefon mit K-9 Mail gesendet. meduolis [via Apache Wicket] ml-node+s1842946n4597714...@n4.nabble.com schrieb: I believe that this is not the right place to ask for Elephas engine howto :) This discussion board is for Elephas http://groups.google.com/group/elephas :D _ If you reply to this email, your message will be added to the discussion below: http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/Elephas-Blog-Engine-how-to-setup-a-test-repo-tp4597689p4597714.html To unsubscribe from Elephas Blog Engine: how to setup a test repo, click here. NAML -- View this message in context: http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/Elephas-Blog-Engine-how-to-setup-a-test-repo-tp4597689p4597860.html Sent from the Users forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: call onsubmit automatically
Hi again,
I maybe replied a little bit quickly (it was launch time :p). So, I meant
about something like this:
HTML:
body onload=window.document.getElementById('form').submit();
form id=form wicket:id=form
input type=hidden wicket:id=page /
/form
/body
Java counterpart:
private FormComponentString input;
public HomePage(final PageParameters parameters) {
final FormVoid form = new FormVoid(form) {
private static final long serialVersionUID = 1L;
@Override
@SuppressWarnings(unchecked)
protected void onSubmit()
{
String typeName = input.getModelObject(); //ie:
com.mycompany.MyPage
Class? extends Page page = (Class? extends Page)
Class.forName(typeName); //!\ need to catch exception
this.setResponsePage(page);
}
};
this.add(form.setMarkupId(form)); //be careful, you have to set
the htmlId yourself because it is hard-coded in the javascript
this.input = new HiddenFieldString(page, new
ModelString(MyPage.class.getName()));
form.add(this.input);
}
Where MyPage is the page you want to redirect to.
Hope it answers your need.
Sebastien.
On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 12:34 PM, raju.ch raju.challagun...@gmail.comwrote:
Thnx for the reply sebastian, but I didn't get the solution what you
suggested..Can you please explain it with an example?
thanks in advance
--
View this message in context:
http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/call-onsubmit-automatically-tp4597765p4597836.html
Sent from the Users forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: Passing parameter to a portion of a page
I'm not sure what you mean by passing a parameter-- you control the forms' construction, so you can pass anything you'd like. If your goal is to make bookmarkable construction parameters available to all forms, getPage().getPageParameters() would help. (That doesn't change with AJAX, though, so probably not what you meant.) If your goal is to share the same IModel among all instances, you might consider stashing it in metadata on the page (getPage().setMetaData(...)), and having your forms grab it from there. Hope that helps, Dan On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 4:10 AM, kshitiz k.agarw...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, Lets say there are many forms in a page and in every form, there is drop down choice with onselectionchange feature. Is it possible to pass a parameter to any one of the form only rather than entire page? Will it be done through Ajax? -- View this message in context: http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/Passing-parameter-to-a-portion-of-a-page-tp4597887.html Sent from the Users forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: dynamic vertical menu
Hi, Lenin. Have you looked into these two examples? They might help you get started. http://www.wicket-library.com/wicket-examples/nested/ http://www.wicket-library.com/wicket-examples/navomatic/ Dan On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 12:30 AM, lenin lening...@gmail.com wrote: Dear, i am new in the wicket1.5.5 framework , how to create dynamic vertical menu(with sub menu) i want to display the page within the menu page. i am trying this past one month but till not able to find out the solution can any one help to resolve the problem... thanks in advance -- View this message in context: http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/dynamic-vertical-menu-tp4597577.html Sent from the Users forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: Setting value to object when validation failed
Generally when a field validation fails, the user's raw input is re-rendered instead of the original model value. This lets the user correct his input instead of retyping the whole thing. Since this is not the behavior you want, you can call firstName.clearInput() in your onError(). On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 12:45 AM, meduolis meduol...@gmail.com wrote: Hello this is quick start project which reproduces my case http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/file/n4597599/project.zip project.zip The problem is, that I cannot set value for object after form validation fails. How to reproduce: 1. Startup my quicstart app; 2. Do not fill required field and press Save; 4. Validation error occurs, that field is required; 3. Press Set name; (this should set first name to John Doe and refresh); Expected result: input field sets to John Doe; Actual result: nothing happens; Does anyone knows what I am doing wrong? :) -- View this message in context: http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/Setting-value-to-object-when-validation-failed-tp4597599.html Sent from the Users forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: Passing parameter to a portion of a page
Thanks for the reply Dan...now consider a situation: You have 5 drop downs, each with onselectionchange enabled. When you change the choice of any one drop down, the chosen value should be passed as parameter to that drop down only, so that it will display new value. Rest drop downs should not get changed. How will you do that? On way would be to allocate each drop down a unique id and then, associate each parameter being passed to the same page with that id. This will help to judge the coming parameter belongs to which drop down. But is there any more efficient way? -- View this message in context: http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/Passing-parameter-to-a-portion-of-a-page-tp4597887p4598758.html Sent from the Users forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: Passing parameter to a portion of a page
What you describe sounds like Wicket's default behavior. It knows which widgets correspond to which Java components, and routes data accordingly when submitted. On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 10:05 AM, kshitiz k.agarw...@gmail.com wrote: Thanks for the reply Dan...now consider a situation: You have 5 drop downs, each with onselectionchange enabled. When you change the choice of any one drop down, the chosen value should be passed as parameter to that drop down only, so that it will display new value. Rest drop downs should not get changed. How will you do that? On way would be to allocate each drop down a unique id and then, associate each parameter being passed to the same page with that id. This will help to judge the coming parameter belongs to which drop down. But is there any more efficient way? -- View this message in context: http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/Passing-parameter-to-a-portion-of-a-page-tp4597887p4598758.html Sent from the Users forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: Passing parameter to a portion of a page
On Mon, 30 Apr 2012 10:05:46 -0700 (PDT) kshitiz k.agarw...@gmail.com wrote: Thanks for the reply Dan...now consider a situation: You have 5 drop downs, each with onselectionchange enabled. When you change the choice of any one drop down, the chosen value should be passed as parameter to that drop down only, so that it will display new value. Rest drop downs should not get changed. How will you do that? I very much recommend looking at wicket-examples, they show very well how Wicket components and pages work together. For most usecases, your components will not have to look directly at page parameters *at all*, and certainly not at other components' parameters. On way would be to allocate each drop down a unique id and then, associate each parameter being passed to the same page with that id. This will help to judge the coming parameter belongs to which drop down. But is there any more efficient way? Your components need a unique id in Wicket anyway. You don't have to handle those parameters yourself though. Simply override DropDownChoice#wantOnSelectionChangedNotifications() to return true, and then #onSelectionChanged will be called *for this component only* when a new value is selected. Carl-Eric - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
ListView (or other Repeater) with backing map
So essentially I want to use Wicket 1.5 to display an item and its associated quantity. The data structure I am using to back this is a Map (new HashMap()) where Item is a POJ whose details are of no consequence. Essentially I would like to use one of wicket's repeaters, but I only have experience using ListView. Is there a repeater that would work well with a Map, or am I going to need to code my own? If I need to code my own, what is the best class to override? The List has has key-value pairs of type: Item-Integer where integer is the quantity. I would the output of the repeater to essentially be something like: QuantityX : ItemName (ItemNum) so for example: 2x : someItem (255609) 1x : someOtherItem (125123) The map can change through user input, but I am familiar with refreshing component's markup with AJAX via Wicket. Your help is much appreciated. -- View this message in context: http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/ListView-or-other-Repeater-with-backing-map-tp4598817.html Sent from the Users forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: ListView (or other Repeater) with backing map
On Mon, 30 Apr 2012 10:25:21 -0700 (PDT) cmagnollay cmagnol...@gmail.com wrote: So essentially I want to use Wicket 1.5 to display an item and its associated quantity. The data structure I am using to back this is a Map (new HashMap()) where Item is a POJ whose details are of no consequence. Essentially I would like to use one of wicket's repeaters, but I only have experience using ListView. Is there a repeater that would work well with a Map, or am I going to need to code my own? If I need to code my own, what is the best class to override? The List has has key-value pairs of type: Item-Integer where integer is the quantity. I'd just use Map#entrySet, which gives you a SetMap.EntryItem,Integer. You can turn that into a list and feed it to a ListViewMap.EntryItem,Integer. That way you have an Entry in each ListItem and can simply use its two parts. Hope this helps. Carl-Eric - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: ListView (or other Repeater) with backing map
if the map is called something like
MapItem, Integer itemMap = new HashMapItem, Integer();
Hmm, so I would instantiate the ListView like so?
ListViewListlt;Map.Entrylt;Item, Integer lv = new
ListViewListlt;Map.Entrylt;Item, Integer(id, new
PropertyModelListlt;Map.Entrylt;Item, Integer(this,
itemMap.entrySet()){
populateItem(Map.EntryItem, Integer entry)
{
}
}
Is this what you are implying somewhat? Thanks for the answer by the way, I
had not considered just, for lack of a better term, fooling the listview
into using my map elements.
--
View this message in context:
http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/ListView-or-other-Repeater-with-backing-map-tp4598817p4598865.html
Sent from the Users forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: ListView (or other Repeater) with backing map
On Mon, 30 Apr 2012 10:43:30 -0700 (PDT)
cmagnollay cmagnol...@gmail.com wrote:
if the map is called something like
MapItem, Integer itemMap = new HashMapItem, Integer();
Hmm, so I would instantiate the ListView like so?
[...]
Is this what you are implying somewhat? Thanks for the answer by the
way, I had not considered just, for lack of a better term, fooling
the listview into using my map elements.
Basically yes, though the propertymodel won't work like that. I'd do
something like this (pseudocode):
MapItem,Integer itemMap = ...;
IModelListMap.EntryItem,Integer mapListModel = new
LoadableDetachableModel() {
load() {
return new ArrayList...(itemMap.entrySet());
}
};
...new ListViewMap.Entry...(id, mapListModel) {
populateItem(ListItemItem,Integer li) {
...
}
}
Carl-Eric
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: Setting value to object when validation failed
This solves my problem. Is there any way to collect all components that fails? or I just have to check each separate component if it has any feedback messages (level ERROR) and then clear it's value by myself? -- View this message in context: http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/Setting-value-to-object-when-validation-failed-tp4597599p4598947.html Sent from the Users forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: Setting value to object when validation failed
Check out Form#clearInput() which calls FormComponent#clearInput() on all of its components. You can do similiar, but incorporate FormComponent#hasErrorMessage() so you don't also reset fields with valid input. On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 11:11 AM, meduolis meduol...@gmail.com wrote: This solves my problem. Is there any way to collect all components that fails? or I just have to check each separate component if it has any feedback messages (level ERROR) and then clear it's value by myself? -- View this message in context: http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/Setting-value-to-object-when-validation-failed-tp4597599p4598947.html Sent from the Users forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: ListView (or other Repeater) with backing map
And I can force the model to update, via AJAX, or in other words, how I force
the list view to update after a user action?
onUpdate(AjaxRequestTarget target)
{
target.add(theListView) ??
}
or is it something I do with the model itself? Sorry, I have no experience
with LoadableDetachable, and a quick glance at the API did not enlighten me.
My guess would be to give the listview a new model on each trigger of the
AJAX code.
--
View this message in context:
http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/ListView-or-other-Repeater-with-backing-map-tp4598817p4599009.html
Sent from the Users forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: ListView (or other Repeater) with backing map
You can call LDM#detach() after the modification, but since this particular
implementation is so light, I'd just use AbstractReadyOnlyModel instead. It
doesn't cache, so detach is not required.
On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 11:36 AM, cmagnollay cmagnol...@gmail.com wrote:
And I can force the model to update, via AJAX, or in other words, how I
force
the list view to update after a user action?
onUpdate(AjaxRequestTarget target)
{
target.add(theListView) ??
}
or is it something I do with the model itself? Sorry, I have no experience
with LoadableDetachable, and a quick glance at the API did not enlighten
me.
My guess would be to give the listview a new model on each trigger of the
AJAX code.
--
View this message in context:
http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/ListView-or-other-Repeater-with-backing-map-tp4598817p4599009.html
Sent from the Users forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: ListView (or other Repeater) with backing map
On Mon, 30 Apr 2012 11:38:36 -0700 Dan Retzlaff dretzl...@gmail.com wrote: You can call LDM#detach() after the modification, but since this particular implementation is so light, I'd just use AbstractReadyOnlyModel instead. It doesn't cache, so detach is not required. Actually, getObject() can be called pretty often, so that would incur the cost of creating the new List object *each time*. I would really use the LDM. Since in my example the LDM is passed directly into the ListView as its default model, the ListView will take care of detaching [1]. cmagnollay, that means that on each render you should simply see whatever is currently in your map, so it should be up to date on its own without further action. An LDM calls the load() method the first time its getObject() is called. The value you return from load() will be cached until detach() is called on the LDM. The normal usecase is to do an expensive operation (load from DB, create a lot of objects, etc) only once in a request but to still have fresh data in each request. Also it reduces session size because the cached data is not kept between requests. Hope this helps! Carl-Eric [1] Carl-Eric's rule of detaching models: *always* do one of the following: - detach the model yourself - pass the model to one of your child components or your superclass, thus making it that code's responsibility. You never know what model implementation you might be getting as a parameter. Be nice to whoever calls you. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: ListView (or other Repeater) with backing map
I assumed the action phase would dereference the ListItemModel (e.g. to remove it from the map), hence dereference the LDM, and then require the explicit detach() before rendering. Agreed that LDM is the way to go if you're concerned about the ArrayList constructions. On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 11:57 AM, Carl-Eric Menzel cmen...@wicketbuch.dewrote: On Mon, 30 Apr 2012 11:38:36 -0700 Dan Retzlaff dretzl...@gmail.com wrote: You can call LDM#detach() after the modification, but since this particular implementation is so light, I'd just use AbstractReadyOnlyModel instead. It doesn't cache, so detach is not required. Actually, getObject() can be called pretty often, so that would incur the cost of creating the new List object *each time*. I would really use the LDM. Since in my example the LDM is passed directly into the ListView as its default model, the ListView will take care of detaching [1]. cmagnollay, that means that on each render you should simply see whatever is currently in your map, so it should be up to date on its own without further action. An LDM calls the load() method the first time its getObject() is called. The value you return from load() will be cached until detach() is called on the LDM. The normal usecase is to do an expensive operation (load from DB, create a lot of objects, etc) only once in a request but to still have fresh data in each request. Also it reduces session size because the cached data is not kept between requests. Hope this helps! Carl-Eric [1] Carl-Eric's rule of detaching models: *always* do one of the following: - detach the model yourself - pass the model to one of your child components or your superclass, thus making it that code's responsibility. You never know what model implementation you might be getting as a parameter. Be nice to whoever calls you. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: Setting value to object when validation failed
OK, I got the idea :), thanks a lot for helping. -- View this message in context: http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/Setting-value-to-object-when-validation-failed-tp4597599p4599127.html Sent from the Users forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: ListView (or other Repeater) with backing map
Thank for you all for the response. I am trying to test that code but am having a different separate issue at the moment. Your solutions however worked exactly as intended. Thank you for all the help! -- View this message in context: http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/ListView-or-other-Repeater-with-backing-map-tp4598817p4599149.html Sent from the Users forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: ListView (or other Repeater) with backing map
On Mon, 30 Apr 2012 12:15:20 -0700 Dan Retzlaff dretzl...@gmail.com wrote: I assumed the action phase would dereference the ListItemModel (e.g. to remove it from the map), hence dereference the LDM, and then require the explicit detach() before rendering. Agreed that LDM is the way to go if you're concerned about the ArrayList constructions. That assumption depends very much on the code you give the model to. Many places will simply call getObject() instead of keeping a reference to whatever is inside. PropertyModel is one of them that is very commonly used. Carl-Eric - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: Migration to wicket 1.5 and properties.xml files
thank you. Ill look into it -- View this message in context: http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/Migration-to-wicket-1-5-and-properties-xml-files-tp4597473p466.html Sent from the Users forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
