Re: [Vote] New Wicket Version Numbering

2011-04-02 Thread Peter Ertl
I just released Hello, World! v9.0 for the ultimate price 
of just $500. Who is interested?
 
Am 02.04.2011 um 03:11 schrieb Bruno Borges:

 Of course it is the best. It has no software error-prone... :-)
 
 No GC problems, no heap calculations.
 
 =)
 
 Bruno Borges
 www.brunoborges.com.br
 +55 21 76727099
 
 The glory of great men should always be
 measured by the means they have used to
 acquire it.
 - Francois de La Rochefoucauld
 
 
 
 On Fri, Apr 1, 2011 at 9:47 PM, Chris Colman
 chr...@stepaheadsoftware.comwrote:
 
 I poon you all with my Atari 7800!
 
 Ok, so it doesn't have a keyboard, let alone a JVM, but the version
 number is so much bigger - it just has to be the best!
 
 -Original Message-
 From: msj121 [mailto:msj...@gmail.com]
 Sent: Saturday, 2 April 2011 8:56 AM
 To: users@wicket.apache.org
 Subject: Re: [Vote] New Wicket Version Numbering
 
 I mean XP is letters... That is pretty amazing, there isn't even a
 number,
 and even roman numerals, is there a 'P' in roman numerals?
 
 --
 View this message in context: http://apache-
 wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/Vote-New-Wicket-Version-Numbering-
 tp3420887p3421249.html
 Sent from the Users forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
 
 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
 For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
 
 
 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
 For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
 
 


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org



[Vote] New Wicket Version Numbering

2011-04-01 Thread Jim Pinkham
I've had a hard time lately trying to get corporate acceptance of the Wicket
framework.

In fact, our company looked at this comparison of java frameworks:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_web_application_frameworks

  *Project* *Current Stable Version*  Apache Click  2.2.0   Apache Cocoon
2.2.0   Apache Struts  2.2.1.1   Apache Tapestry  5.2.4   Apache Wicket
1.4.15   AppFuse  2.0.2   Aranea  1.0.10   Eclipse RAP  1.2.0   FormEngine
1.7.1   Google Web Toolkit  2.2.0   Hamlets  1.6  IceFaces  2  ItsNat
1  JavaServer
Faces  2  JBoss Seam  2.2.0 GA   Jspx-bay  1.1.0   JVx WebUI  0.8  ManyDesigns
Portofino  3.1.10   OpenLaszlo  4.1  OpenXava  4.0.1   Oracle ADF  11.1.1.4
Play  1.1.1   RIFE  1.6.2   Shale  1.0.4   Sling  5  SmartClient  8  Spring
3.0.5   Stripes  1.5.4   Telosys  1.1.1   ThinWire  1.2  Vaadin(IT Mill
Toolkit)  6.5.1   Wavemaker  6.1.10   WebObjects  5.4.3   WebWork  2.2.6
ZK  5.0.5   ztemplates  0.9.9.6

The powers that be decided to pick Smart Client over Apache Wicket because
they have the highest version number.

So, I think the time is right to move straight to the front of the pack and
release version 10.0.

Who's with me?

-- Jim

Spinal Tap Industries, Inc.


Re: [Vote] New Wicket Version Numbering

2011-04-01 Thread Igor Vaynberg
where do i apply for a job there? sounds like fun!

-igor

On Fri, Apr 1, 2011 at 10:56 AM, Jim Pinkham pinkh...@gmail.com wrote:
 I've had a hard time lately trying to get corporate acceptance of the Wicket
 framework.

 In fact, our company looked at this comparison of java frameworks:

 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_web_application_frameworks

  *Project* *Current Stable Version*  Apache Click  2.2.0   Apache Cocoon
 2.2.0   Apache Struts  2.2.1.1   Apache Tapestry  5.2.4   Apache Wicket
 1.4.15   AppFuse  2.0.2   Aranea  1.0.10   Eclipse RAP  1.2.0   FormEngine
 1.7.1   Google Web Toolkit  2.2.0   Hamlets  1.6  IceFaces  2  ItsNat
 1  JavaServer
 Faces  2  JBoss Seam  2.2.0 GA   Jspx-bay  1.1.0   JVx WebUI  0.8  ManyDesigns
 Portofino  3.1.10   OpenLaszlo  4.1  OpenXava  4.0.1   Oracle ADF  11.1.1.4
 Play  1.1.1   RIFE  1.6.2   Shale  1.0.4   Sling  5  SmartClient  8  Spring
 3.0.5   Stripes  1.5.4   Telosys  1.1.1   ThinWire  1.2  Vaadin(IT Mill
 Toolkit)  6.5.1   Wavemaker  6.1.10   WebObjects  5.4.3   WebWork  2.2.6
 ZK  5.0.5   ztemplates  0.9.9.6

 The powers that be decided to pick Smart Client over Apache Wicket because
 they have the highest version number.

 So, I think the time is right to move straight to the front of the pack and
 release version 10.0.

 Who's with me?

 -- Jim

 Spinal Tap Industries, Inc.


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org



Re: [Vote] New Wicket Version Numbering

2011-04-01 Thread nino martinez wael
Gotta be a aprils fools thing..

Who would decide what framework to be used based on version number?
Why not take a look at architecture instead... Ooh lets chose windows
95 instead of windows 7, it has a higher number so it gotta be better
.

2011/4/1 Igor Vaynberg igor.vaynb...@gmail.com:
 where do i apply for a job there? sounds like fun!

 -igor

 On Fri, Apr 1, 2011 at 10:56 AM, Jim Pinkham pinkh...@gmail.com wrote:
 I've had a hard time lately trying to get corporate acceptance of the Wicket
 framework.

 In fact, our company looked at this comparison of java frameworks:

 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_web_application_frameworks

  *Project* *Current Stable Version*  Apache Click  2.2.0   Apache Cocoon
 2.2.0   Apache Struts  2.2.1.1   Apache Tapestry  5.2.4   Apache Wicket
 1.4.15   AppFuse  2.0.2   Aranea  1.0.10   Eclipse RAP  1.2.0   FormEngine
 1.7.1   Google Web Toolkit  2.2.0   Hamlets  1.6  IceFaces  2  ItsNat
 1  JavaServer
 Faces  2  JBoss Seam  2.2.0 GA   Jspx-bay  1.1.0   JVx WebUI  0.8  
 ManyDesigns
 Portofino  3.1.10   OpenLaszlo  4.1  OpenXava  4.0.1   Oracle ADF  11.1.1.4
 Play  1.1.1   RIFE  1.6.2   Shale  1.0.4   Sling  5  SmartClient  8  Spring
 3.0.5   Stripes  1.5.4   Telosys  1.1.1   ThinWire  1.2  Vaadin(IT Mill
 Toolkit)  6.5.1   Wavemaker  6.1.10   WebObjects  5.4.3   WebWork  2.2.6
 ZK  5.0.5   ztemplates  0.9.9.6

 The powers that be decided to pick Smart Client over Apache Wicket because
 they have the highest version number.

 So, I think the time is right to move straight to the front of the pack and
 release version 10.0.

 Who's with me?

 -- Jim

 Spinal Tap Industries, Inc.


 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
 For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org



-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org



Re: [Vote] New Wicket Version Numbering

2011-04-01 Thread Rafał Krupiński

W dniu 01.04.2011 20:14, nino martinez wael pisze:

Gotta be a aprils fools thing..

Who would decide what framework to be used based on version number?
Why not take a look at architecture instead... Ooh lets chose windows
95 instead of windows 7, it has a higher number so it gotta be better


You have a valid point there, it's time to switch back to Win95

Rafał Krupiński

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org



Re: [Vote] New Wicket Version Numbering

2011-04-01 Thread Igor Vaynberg
im running win 2000, you guys are too far behind.

-igor


2011/4/1 Rafał Krupiński r.krupin...@gmail.com:
 W dniu 01.04.2011 20:14, nino martinez wael pisze:

 Gotta be a aprils fools thing..

 Who would decide what framework to be used based on version number?
 Why not take a look at architecture instead... Ooh lets chose windows
 95 instead of windows 7, it has a higher number so it gotta be better

 You have a valid point there, it's time to switch back to Win95

 Rafał Krupiński

 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
 For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org



-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org



Re: [Vote] New Wicket Version Numbering

2011-04-01 Thread nino martinez wael
hah some of our servers are 2008 r2 :)
However im considering doing a nix distribution called HAL 9000 as
it probably will attract a lot of users based on the high number...

2011/4/1 Igor Vaynberg igor.vaynb...@gmail.com:
 im running win 2000, you guys are too far behind.

 -igor


 2011/4/1 Rafał Krupiński r.krupin...@gmail.com:
 W dniu 01.04.2011 20:14, nino martinez wael pisze:

 Gotta be a aprils fools thing..

 Who would decide what framework to be used based on version number?
 Why not take a look at architecture instead... Ooh lets chose windows
 95 instead of windows 7, it has a higher number so it gotta be better

 You have a valid point there, it's time to switch back to Win95

 Rafał Krupiński

 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
 For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org



 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
 For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org



-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org



Re: [Vote] New Wicket Version Numbering

2011-04-01 Thread Korbinian Bachl - whiskyworld
OMG?!? ARE YOU SERIOUS??? Here we are already using WINDOWS 2000 with 
OFFICE 2010 ;)


(Note: never ever believe any mails, blogs, newspapers on april 1st *g*)



Am 01.04.11 20:14, schrieb nino martinez wael:

Gotta be a aprils fools thing..

Who would decide what framework to be used based on version number?
Why not take a look at architecture instead... Ooh lets chose windows
95 instead of windows 7, it has a higher number so it gotta be better
.

2011/4/1 Igor Vaynbergigor.vaynb...@gmail.com:

where do i apply for a job there? sounds like fun!

-igor

On Fri, Apr 1, 2011 at 10:56 AM, Jim Pinkhampinkh...@gmail.com  wrote:

I've had a hard time lately trying to get corporate acceptance of the Wicket
framework.

In fact, our company looked at this comparison of java frameworks:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_web_application_frameworks

  *Project* *Current Stable Version*  Apache Click  2.2.0   Apache Cocoon
2.2.0   Apache Struts  2.2.1.1   Apache Tapestry  5.2.4   Apache Wicket
1.4.15   AppFuse  2.0.2   Aranea  1.0.10   Eclipse RAP  1.2.0   FormEngine
1.7.1   Google Web Toolkit  2.2.0   Hamlets  1.6  IceFaces  2  ItsNat
1  JavaServer
Faces  2  JBoss Seam  2.2.0 GA   Jspx-bay  1.1.0   JVx WebUI  0.8  ManyDesigns
Portofino  3.1.10   OpenLaszlo  4.1  OpenXava  4.0.1   Oracle ADF  11.1.1.4
Play  1.1.1   RIFE  1.6.2   Shale  1.0.4   Sling  5  SmartClient  8  Spring
3.0.5   Stripes  1.5.4   Telosys  1.1.1   ThinWire  1.2  Vaadin(IT Mill
Toolkit)  6.5.1   Wavemaker  6.1.10   WebObjects  5.4.3   WebWork  2.2.6
ZK  5.0.5   ztemplates  0.9.9.6

The powers that be decided to pick Smart Client over Apache Wicket because
they have the highest version number.

So, I think the time is right to move straight to the front of the pack and
release version 10.0.

Who's with me?

-- Jim

Spinal Tap Industries, Inc.



-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org




-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org



--

  whiskyworld e.K.
  http://www.whiskyworld.de
  Ziegelfeld 6
  94481 Grafenau/ Haus im Wald
  Tel. 08555/ 406 320
  Fax. 08555/ 406 319

  Amtsgericht Passau: HRA 11760
  Geschäftsführer: Ulrike Bachl
  UstID: DE260619452
  

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org



Re: [Vote] New Wicket Version Numbering

2011-04-01 Thread msj121
I mean XP is letters... That is pretty amazing, there isn't even a number,
and even roman numerals, is there a 'P' in roman numerals?

--
View this message in context: 
http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/Vote-New-Wicket-Version-Numbering-tp3420887p3421249.html
Sent from the Users forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org



RE: [Vote] New Wicket Version Numbering

2011-04-01 Thread Chris Colman
I poon you all with my Atari 7800!

Ok, so it doesn't have a keyboard, let alone a JVM, but the version
number is so much bigger - it just has to be the best!

-Original Message-
From: msj121 [mailto:msj...@gmail.com]
Sent: Saturday, 2 April 2011 8:56 AM
To: users@wicket.apache.org
Subject: Re: [Vote] New Wicket Version Numbering

I mean XP is letters... That is pretty amazing, there isn't even a
number,
and even roman numerals, is there a 'P' in roman numerals?

--
View this message in context: http://apache-
wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/Vote-New-Wicket-Version-Numbering-
tp3420887p3421249.html
Sent from the Users forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org



Re: [Vote] New Wicket Version Numbering

2011-04-01 Thread Bruno Borges
Of course it is the best. It has no software error-prone... :-)

No GC problems, no heap calculations.

=)

Bruno Borges
www.brunoborges.com.br
+55 21 76727099

The glory of great men should always be
measured by the means they have used to
acquire it.
 - Francois de La Rochefoucauld



On Fri, Apr 1, 2011 at 9:47 PM, Chris Colman
chr...@stepaheadsoftware.comwrote:

 I poon you all with my Atari 7800!

 Ok, so it doesn't have a keyboard, let alone a JVM, but the version
 number is so much bigger - it just has to be the best!

 -Original Message-
 From: msj121 [mailto:msj...@gmail.com]
 Sent: Saturday, 2 April 2011 8:56 AM
 To: users@wicket.apache.org
 Subject: Re: [Vote] New Wicket Version Numbering
 
 I mean XP is letters... That is pretty amazing, there isn't even a
 number,
 and even roman numerals, is there a 'P' in roman numerals?
 
 --
 View this message in context: http://apache-
 wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/Vote-New-Wicket-Version-Numbering-
 tp3420887p3421249.html
 Sent from the Users forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
 
 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
 For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org


 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
 For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org