Re: wicket 1.4.12 and wicket-push 1.4.8
Please suggest me if comet works with lazyloading components ? also I use AjaxDefaultDatatable each row in the datatable has a panel , each panel which listens to its own channel all channels are unique, the datatbale also has ajaxpagination so when 2 page is selected the datatbale is repainted and new panels are created for each row this was my use case and I had problems with comet , so in simple words does comet supports components which are replaced by ajax ? -- View this message in context: http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/wicket-1-4-12-and-wicket-push-1-4-8-tp3022594p3027089.html Sent from the Users forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: wicket 1.4.12 and wicket-push 1.4.8
IT does not work well for components INSIDE the datatable, You are not using push behavior correctly, if the push behavior adds a persistence communication channel between a component and the server, the channel will break once the component is removed. I still don't understand why you need push in these examples... On Thu, 2010-11-04 at 07:20 -0700, fachhoch wrote: Please suggest me if comet works with lazyloading components ? also I use AjaxDefaultDatatable each row in the datatable has a panel , each panel which listens to its own channel all channels are unique, the datatbale also has ajaxpagination so when 2 page is selected the datatbale is repainted and new panels are created for each row this was my use case and I had problems with comet , so in simple words does comet supports components which are replaced by ajax ?
Re: wicket 1.4.12 and wicket-push 1.4.8
ok i will try the new version and test it . why I need push here is I display status in each of these panels. mine is a workflow application as workflow changes for a PK I have to update the current status which is shown in these panels. -- View this message in context: http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/wicket-1-4-12-and-wicket-push-1-4-8-tp3022594p3027752.html Sent from the Users forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: wicket 1.4.12 and wicket-push 1.4.8
As part of wicketstuff 1.4.13 we have the new implementation released now. give it a try and also check the examples since the API has changed. Regards, seb On 01.11.2010 19:35, fachhoch wrote: I am using wicket 1.4.12 and wicket-push 1.4.8 , will this combination work fine or can cause any issues ? I cannot upgrade to wicket push to 1.4.12 because of bugs . Please tell me if it is ok to use this combination ? - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
wicket 1.4.12 and wicket-push 1.4.8
I am using wicket 1.4.12 and wicket-push 1.4.8 , will this combination work fine or can cause any issues ? I cannot upgrade to wicket push to 1.4.12 because of bugs . Please tell me if it is ok to use this combination ? -- View this message in context: http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/wicket-1-4-12-and-wicket-push-1-4-8-tp3022594p3022594.html Sent from the Users forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: wicket 1.4.12 and wicket-push 1.4.8
Yes, this is safe. Sebastian did some great work cleaning up the original API and classes. The examples have also been extended to make the usage scenarios much clearer. We are working on moving all this work into wicketstuff right now, we would love for you to test it later as it becomes available, but please feel free to use the previous (1.4.8) release as it is still the most stable. On Mon, 2010-11-01 at 11:35 -0700, fachhoch wrote: I am using wicket 1.4.12 and wicket-push 1.4.8 , will this combination work fine or can cause any issues ? I cannot upgrade to wicket push to 1.4.12 because of bugs . Please tell me if it is ok to use this combination ?