[xwiki-users] Annotations

2014-05-13 Thread Michael Bußler
Hi there,

I observed the Annotation-code in XWiki is having problems with the general
approach of having a document-class rendered by a class-specific sheet.
E.g. the highlighting of text passages isn't rendering properly.
Is this a general limitation or am I doing something wrong with the
classes' sheet? It's more or less a listing of textfields fed by class
properties.

Best, Michael
___
users mailing list
users@xwiki.org
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/users


Re: [xwiki-users] Using parameter macro in the js extension

2014-05-13 Thread Michael Bußler
Hi, the velocity-code is executed on the server, while js-code runs on the
client side, AFTER the macro-code was executed .
You could try need to pass parameters to your macro via an URL parameter or
http POST.

Hope this helps!

Best, Michael
Am 12.05.2014 19:01 schrieb Eduardo Abritta eduardo.abri...@outlook.com:

 Hi Sirs,

 I am developing a macro in velocity (wiki macro) and need to use a
 parameter (wiki macro parameter) defined by the user in my java script code
 (java script extension). I tried  can several methods but it is not working.

 How can I do this?




 Atenciosamente,
 Eduardo Abritta
 e-mail: eduardo.abri...@outlook.com |



 ___
 users mailing list
 users@xwiki.org
 http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/users

___
users mailing list
users@xwiki.org
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/users


Re: [xwiki-users] XWIKI to MediaWIKI

2014-05-13 Thread Thomas Mortagne
There is no existing tool I know of for this, see my answer on your
other mail on dev mailing list.

On Mon, May 12, 2014 at 11:59 PM, walid yaich walid.ya...@gmail.com wrote:
 Hi everybody,

 The reason is that we need a simple workflow in the wiki, the extension XWiki
 Publication Workflow Application not working.

 Well, actually i need to move from XWIKI to MediaWIKI, but the most
 difficult problem is the migration

 Would you please give me any clue about the easiest way to migrate the
 whole content from XWIKI to MediaWIKI

 Thanks in advance :)
 ___
 users mailing list
 users@xwiki.org
 http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/users



-- 
Thomas Mortagne
___
users mailing list
users@xwiki.org
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/users


Re: [xwiki-users] Using parameter macro in the js extension

2014-05-13 Thread Jeremie BOUSQUET
Hi,


2014-05-13 8:40 GMT+02:00 Michael Bußler michael.buss...@googlemail.com:

 Hi, the velocity-code is executed on the server, while js-code runs on the
 client side, AFTER the macro-code was executed .
 You could try need to pass parameters to your macro via an URL parameter or
 http POST.


Only if value needs to be refreshed without a page refresh. If value comes
from a velocity macro, it's in the context of a page, so it's enough to
initialize the javascript var from velocity (which is ok as velocity is
executed before) - it's not supposed to be updated server-side after the
page is rendered.
Of course if it needs to be dynamic you could go ajax.
Well my understanding of Eduardo is that he needs to initialize a value in
javascript, based on a macro parameter passed to a velocity macro.



 Hope this helps!

 Best, Michael
 Am 12.05.2014 19:01 schrieb Eduardo Abritta eduardo.abri...@outlook.com
 :

  Hi Sirs,
 
  I am developing a macro in velocity (wiki macro) and need to use a
  parameter (wiki macro parameter) defined by the user in my java script
 code
  (java script extension). I tried  can several methods but it is not
 working.
 
  How can I do this?
 
 
 
 
  Atenciosamente,
  Eduardo Abritta
  e-mail: eduardo.abri...@outlook.com |
 
 
 
  ___
  users mailing list
  users@xwiki.org
  http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/users
 
 ___
 users mailing list
 users@xwiki.org
 http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/users

___
users mailing list
users@xwiki.org
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/users


Re: [xwiki-users] XWIKI to MediaWIKI

2014-05-13 Thread vinc...@massol.net
 

On 12 May 2014 at 23:59:35, walid yaich 
(walid.ya...@gmail.com(mailto:walid.ya...@gmail.com)) wrote:

 Hi everybody,
  
 The reason is that we need a simple workflow in the wiki, the extension XWiki
 Publication Workflow Application not working.

hmm that doesn’t seem a good reason to switch IMO… :)

You’re going to spend 10 times more time writing a migrator than you would to 
make the Workflow Application work. AFAICS you’ve just posted an email about 
the Workflow issue only a few minutes/hours ago and you’re not even waiting for 
the response before deciding to migrate, that doesn’t look serious to me…

Thanks
-Vincent

 Well, actually i need to move from XWIKI to MediaWIKI, but the most
 difficult problem is the migration
  
 Would you please give me any clue about the easiest way to migrate the
 whole content from XWIKI to MediaWIKI
  
 Thanks in advance :)
___
users mailing list
users@xwiki.org
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/users


Re: [xwiki-users] XWIKI to MediaWIKI

2014-05-13 Thread walid yaich
I'm sorry, i'm so serious, we're more than 300 persons in the company using
XIWKI, si i'm pretty serious, if it's possible to write a tool to migrate
in 1 or 2 weeks, i'll probably do it.

Maybe you're right, i didn't wait much, but i spend much time trying to
make it work and i didn't even understand the concept of this extension, so
maybe it's not well documented, in 1 days i get MediaWIKI with the
extension work  properly, but i spend 3 days on XWIKI without any result,
so maybe one another reason is documentation :)




2014-05-13 9:18 GMT+01:00 vinc...@massol.net vinc...@massol.net:



 On 12 May 2014 at 23:59:35, walid yaich (walid.ya...@gmail.com(mailto:
 walid.ya...@gmail.com)) wrote:

  Hi everybody,
 
  The reason is that we need a simple workflow in the wiki, the extension
 XWiki
  Publication Workflow Application not working.

 hmm that doesn’t seem a good reason to switch IMO… :)

 You’re going to spend 10 times more time writing a migrator than you would
 to make the Workflow Application work. AFAICS you’ve just posted an email
 about the Workflow issue only a few minutes/hours ago and you’re not even
 waiting for the response before deciding to migrate, that doesn’t look
 serious to me…

 Thanks
 -Vincent

  Well, actually i need to move from XWIKI to MediaWIKI, but the most
  difficult problem is the migration
 
  Would you please give me any clue about the easiest way to migrate the
  whole content from XWIKI to MediaWIKI
 
  Thanks in advance :)

___
users mailing list
users@xwiki.org
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/users


Re: [xwiki-users] XWIKI to MediaWIKI

2014-05-13 Thread vinc...@massol.net
Hi Walid,

On 13 May 2014 at 10:23:42, walid yaich 
(walid.ya...@gmail.com(mailto:walid.ya...@gmail.com)) wrote:

 I'm sorry, i'm so serious, we're more than 300 persons in the company using 
 XIWKI, si i'm pretty serious, if it's possible to write a tool to migrate in 
 1 or 2 weeks, i'll probably do it.

BTW did you check the comments at 
http://extensions.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Extension/XWiki+Publication+Workflow+Application
 ?

Note that this extension is NOT developed by the XWiki dev team, it’s done by 
some individual and is in no way supported by the XWiki dev team.

Also note that you don’t need this extension at all to implement a simple 
workflow in XWiki. It can be done easily with the notion of XClass/XObjects 
natively but you’d need to spend 1-2 days to understand these concepts. 
Actually these concepts are the main reason people use XWiki and they allow you 
to go so much further than any other wiki can go.

If you’re serious and want to build something for the long run, I highly 
recommend that you spend 2-3 days to get familiar with XWiki before making an 
impacting change for your company.

Some tutorials on XClass/XObjects:
- http://platform.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/DevGuide/DataModel
- http://platform.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/DevGuide/FAQTutorial

Generally speaking you’ll find technical resources here:
http://platform.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/DevGuide/WebHome

 Maybe you're right, i didn't wait much, but i spend much time trying to make 
 it work and i didn't even understand the concept of this extension, so maybe 
 it's not well documented, in 1 days i get MediaWIKI with the extension work 
 properly, but i spend 3 days on XWIKI without any result, so maybe one 
 another reason is documentation :)


Yes that’s a good point. We always need to improve documentation. In this case 
however, it’s beyond our control since this is an extension contributed by some 
individual and is in no way managed by the XWiki dev team.

What could help would be to have a Workflow extension developed/supported by 
the XWiki dev team. If enough people request this, this could be considered 
indeed.

BTW most people switch from Mediawiki to XWiki because they’re quickly limited 
by Mediawiki on the “enterprise” aspects: fine-grained permissions, flat page 
hierarchy, LDAP integration, Office integration, etc.

Thanks
-Vincent

 2014-05-13 9:18 GMT+01:00 vinc...@massol.net(mailto:vinc...@massol.net) :
   
  On 12 May 2014 at 23:59:35, walid yaich 
  (walid.ya...@gmail.com(mailto:walid.ya...@gmail.com)(mailto:walid.ya...@gmail.com))
   wrote:
   
   Hi everybody,
  
   The reason is that we need a simple workflow in the wiki, the extension 
   XWiki
   Publication Workflow Application not working.  
   
  hmm that doesn’t seem a good reason to switch IMO… :)  
   
  You’re going to spend 10 times more time writing a migrator than you would 
  to make the Workflow Application work. AFAICS you’ve just posted an email 
  about the Workflow issue only a few minutes/hours ago and you’re not even 
  waiting for the response before deciding to migrate, that doesn’t look 
  serious to me…  
   
  Thanks  
  -Vincent
   
   Well, actually i need to move from XWIKI to MediaWIKI, but the most
   difficult problem is the migration
  
   Would you please give me any clue about the easiest way to migrate the
   whole content from XWIKI to MediaWIKI
  
   Thanks in advance :)
  
___
users mailing list
users@xwiki.org
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/users


Re: [xwiki-users] XWIKI to MediaWIKI

2014-05-13 Thread walid yaich
Thank you so much, i'll talk to my boss and see what can we do, so nice to
get responses


2014-05-13 9:32 GMT+01:00 vinc...@massol.net vinc...@massol.net:

 Hi Walid,

 On 13 May 2014 at 10:23:42, walid yaich (walid.ya...@gmail.com(mailto:
 walid.ya...@gmail.com)) wrote:

  I'm sorry, i'm so serious, we're more than 300 persons in the company
 using XIWKI, si i'm pretty serious, if it's possible to write a tool to
 migrate in 1 or 2 weeks, i'll probably do it.

 BTW did you check the comments at
 http://extensions.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Extension/XWiki+Publication+Workflow+Application?

 Note that this extension is NOT developed by the XWiki dev team, it’s done
 by some individual and is in no way supported by the XWiki dev team.

 Also note that you don’t need this extension at all to implement a simple
 workflow in XWiki. It can be done easily with the notion of XClass/XObjects
 natively but you’d need to spend 1-2 days to understand these concepts.
 Actually these concepts are the main reason people use XWiki and they allow
 you to go so much further than any other wiki can go.

 If you’re serious and want to build something for the long run, I highly
 recommend that you spend 2-3 days to get familiar with XWiki before making
 an impacting change for your company.

 Some tutorials on XClass/XObjects:
 - http://platform.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/DevGuide/DataModel
 - http://platform.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/DevGuide/FAQTutorial

 Generally speaking you’ll find technical resources here:
 http://platform.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/DevGuide/WebHome

  Maybe you're right, i didn't wait much, but i spend much time trying to
 make it work and i didn't even understand the concept of this extension, so
 maybe it's not well documented, in 1 days i get MediaWIKI with the
 extension work properly, but i spend 3 days on XWIKI without any result, so
 maybe one another reason is documentation :)


 Yes that’s a good point. We always need to improve documentation. In this
 case however, it’s beyond our control since this is an extension
 contributed by some individual and is in no way managed by the XWiki dev
 team.

 What could help would be to have a Workflow extension developed/supported
 by the XWiki dev team. If enough people request this, this could be
 considered indeed.

 BTW most people switch from Mediawiki to XWiki because they’re quickly
 limited by Mediawiki on the “enterprise” aspects: fine-grained permissions,
 flat page hierarchy, LDAP integration, Office integration, etc.

 Thanks
 -Vincent

  2014-05-13 9:18 GMT+01:00 vinc...@massol.net(mailto:vinc...@massol.net)
 :

  
   On 12 May 2014 at 23:59:35, walid yaich (walid.ya...@gmail.com(mailto:
 walid.ya...@gmail.com)(mailto:walid.ya...@gmail.com)) wrote:
  
Hi everybody,
   
The reason is that we need a simple workflow in the wiki, the
 extension XWiki
Publication Workflow Application not working.
  
   hmm that doesn’t seem a good reason to switch IMO… :)
  
   You’re going to spend 10 times more time writing a migrator than you
 would to make the Workflow Application work. AFAICS you’ve just posted an
 email about the Workflow issue only a few minutes/hours ago and you’re not
 even waiting for the response before deciding to migrate, that doesn’t look
 serious to me…
  
   Thanks
   -Vincent
  
Well, actually i need to move from XWIKI to MediaWIKI, but the most
difficult problem is the migration
   
Would you please give me any clue about the easiest way to migrate
 the
whole content from XWIKI to MediaWIKI
   
Thanks in advance :)
 

___
users mailing list
users@xwiki.org
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/users


Re: [xwiki-users] XWiki Publication Workflow Application

2014-05-13 Thread Anca Luca
Hello,

So first you need to make sure you installed both the API and the
application (the APi is a dependency of the application, so if you install
with Extension Manager that will just work, if you install manually you
need to handle it yourself).
Then, once installed, create at least one workflow in the place of your
choice (iirc, there is a template provider that is available in the
PublicationWorkflow space, so just use the Add - Page menu in this
space). This workflow is an association of groups of contributors,
validators, etc. Then, in the space where you wanna keep your draft
documents, add the  PublicationWorkflow.PublicationWorkflowPanel panel from
the administration. Then, for a draft document that you created, use the
form in this panel to setup the destination document, where the draft
should be copied when it was approved for publication (the published
document). The rights on the draft documents are handled by the workflow
extension, but the rights on the published document need to be handled by
you (e.g. remove all edit rights of people on that space, since nobody
should be editing directly a published document, they should go through the
draft and publication process). Now, you're all done, this panel should be
showing you actions that you can do on the document. Also, if you put this
panel (or use the macro somehow) on the published document, it will allow
you to go back from the published document to its corresponding draft.

If you still have troubles, check the logs of your wiki and give the
exception/message/warning if there is any in the logs (when you get
workflow.script.failed).

Happy XWikiing,
Anca


On Mon, May 12, 2014 at 11:46 PM, walid yaich walid.ya...@gmail.com wrote:

 Hi,

 Basically my need is to have a simple workflow, someone to edit a page and
 another to validate and publish.

 I can't get this extension working, i setup it on XWIKI 4.4 (5.2 too) and
 try to run a workflow but i always get workflow.script.failed.

 Please, do you know how to get it work ?

 Thanks in advance
 ___
 users mailing list
 users@xwiki.org
 http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/users

___
users mailing list
users@xwiki.org
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/users


Re: [xwiki-users] XWiki Publication Workflow Application

2014-05-13 Thread walid yaich
Thank you so much,

Probably its because i don't understand XWIKi basics, now i'll take my
time to understand basics

You're a good community !


2014-05-13 9:50 GMT+01:00 Anca Luca lu...@xwiki.com:

 Hello,

 So first you need to make sure you installed both the API and the
 application (the APi is a dependency of the application, so if you install
 with Extension Manager that will just work, if you install manually you
 need to handle it yourself).
 Then, once installed, create at least one workflow in the place of your
 choice (iirc, there is a template provider that is available in the
 PublicationWorkflow space, so just use the Add - Page menu in this
 space). This workflow is an association of groups of contributors,
 validators, etc. Then, in the space where you wanna keep your draft
 documents, add the  PublicationWorkflow.PublicationWorkflowPanel panel from
 the administration. Then, for a draft document that you created, use the
 form in this panel to setup the destination document, where the draft
 should be copied when it was approved for publication (the published
 document). The rights on the draft documents are handled by the workflow
 extension, but the rights on the published document need to be handled by
 you (e.g. remove all edit rights of people on that space, since nobody
 should be editing directly a published document, they should go through the
 draft and publication process). Now, you're all done, this panel should be
 showing you actions that you can do on the document. Also, if you put this
 panel (or use the macro somehow) on the published document, it will allow
 you to go back from the published document to its corresponding draft.

 If you still have troubles, check the logs of your wiki and give the
 exception/message/warning if there is any in the logs (when you get
 workflow.script.failed).

 Happy XWikiing,
 Anca


 On Mon, May 12, 2014 at 11:46 PM, walid yaich walid.ya...@gmail.com
 wrote:

  Hi,
 
  Basically my need is to have a simple workflow, someone to edit a page
 and
  another to validate and publish.
 
  I can't get this extension working, i setup it on XWIKI 4.4 (5.2 too) and
  try to run a workflow but i always get workflow.script.failed.
 
  Please, do you know how to get it work ?
 
  Thanks in advance
  ___
  users mailing list
  users@xwiki.org
  http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/users
 
 ___
 users mailing list
 users@xwiki.org
 http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/users

___
users mailing list
users@xwiki.org
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/users


Re: [xwiki-users] XWIKI to MediaWIKI

2014-05-13 Thread walid yaich
Thanks to your advice, i'm going to spend 2-3 days on basics and see if i
can make the simple workflow this week ;)

Good community ! i like it :)


2014-05-13 9:49 GMT+01:00 walid yaich walid.ya...@gmail.com:

 Thank you so much, i'll talk to my boss and see what can we do, so nice to
 get responses


 2014-05-13 9:32 GMT+01:00 vinc...@massol.net vinc...@massol.net:

 Hi Walid,

 On 13 May 2014 at 10:23:42, walid yaich (walid.ya...@gmail.com(mailto:
 walid.ya...@gmail.com)) wrote:

  I'm sorry, i'm so serious, we're more than 300 persons in the company
 using XIWKI, si i'm pretty serious, if it's possible to write a tool to
 migrate in 1 or 2 weeks, i'll probably do it.

 BTW did you check the comments at
 http://extensions.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Extension/XWiki+Publication+Workflow+Application?

 Note that this extension is NOT developed by the XWiki dev team, it’s
 done by some individual and is in no way supported by the XWiki dev team.

 Also note that you don’t need this extension at all to implement a simple
 workflow in XWiki. It can be done easily with the notion of XClass/XObjects
 natively but you’d need to spend 1-2 days to understand these concepts.
 Actually these concepts are the main reason people use XWiki and they allow
 you to go so much further than any other wiki can go.

 If you’re serious and want to build something for the long run, I highly
 recommend that you spend 2-3 days to get familiar with XWiki before making
 an impacting change for your company.

 Some tutorials on XClass/XObjects:
 - http://platform.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/DevGuide/DataModel
 - http://platform.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/DevGuide/FAQTutorial

 Generally speaking you’ll find technical resources here:
 http://platform.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/DevGuide/WebHome

  Maybe you're right, i didn't wait much, but i spend much time trying to
 make it work and i didn't even understand the concept of this extension, so
 maybe it's not well documented, in 1 days i get MediaWIKI with the
 extension work properly, but i spend 3 days on XWIKI without any result, so
 maybe one another reason is documentation :)


 Yes that’s a good point. We always need to improve documentation. In this
 case however, it’s beyond our control since this is an extension
 contributed by some individual and is in no way managed by the XWiki dev
 team.

 What could help would be to have a Workflow extension developed/supported
 by the XWiki dev team. If enough people request this, this could be
 considered indeed.

 BTW most people switch from Mediawiki to XWiki because they’re quickly
 limited by Mediawiki on the “enterprise” aspects: fine-grained permissions,
 flat page hierarchy, LDAP integration, Office integration, etc.

 Thanks
 -Vincent

  2014-05-13 9:18 GMT+01:00 vinc...@massol.net(mailto:vinc...@massol.net)
 :

  
   On 12 May 2014 at 23:59:35, walid yaich (walid.ya...@gmail.com
 (mailto:walid.ya...@gmail.com)(mailto:walid.ya...@gmail.com)) wrote:
  
Hi everybody,
   
The reason is that we need a simple workflow in the wiki, the
 extension XWiki
Publication Workflow Application not working.
  
   hmm that doesn’t seem a good reason to switch IMO… :)
  
   You’re going to spend 10 times more time writing a migrator than you
 would to make the Workflow Application work. AFAICS you’ve just posted an
 email about the Workflow issue only a few minutes/hours ago and you’re not
 even waiting for the response before deciding to migrate, that doesn’t look
 serious to me…
  
   Thanks
   -Vincent
  
Well, actually i need to move from XWIKI to MediaWIKI, but the most
difficult problem is the migration
   
Would you please give me any clue about the easiest way to migrate
 the
whole content from XWIKI to MediaWIKI
   
Thanks in advance :)
 



___
users mailing list
users@xwiki.org
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/users


Re: [xwiki-users] Annotations

2014-05-13 Thread Anca Luca
Hello Michael,

there is a chance that this is a standard issue, but it also depends on
what you're trying to do.

The main limitation of the annotations is that they are not working on
content rendered with the {{html}} macro, because they are rendered at the
XDOM Level and the html macro is not parsed in the XDOM. So if your sheet
does everything in a html macro, than chances are it won't work. If your
sheet is rendering using the xwiki syntax, then stuff should work fine.

Can you describe a bit more in detail your problem? or if you have an
online server, show us there what's happening? is your sheet custom? can
you show the code of your sheet? a screenshot of isn't rendering properly?

Anca


On Tue, May 13, 2014 at 8:38 AM, Michael Bußler 
michael.buss...@googlemail.com wrote:

 Hi there,

 I observed the Annotation-code in XWiki is having problems with the general
 approach of having a document-class rendered by a class-specific sheet.
 E.g. the highlighting of text passages isn't rendering properly.
 Is this a general limitation or am I doing something wrong with the
 classes' sheet? It's more or less a listing of textfields fed by class
 properties.

 Best, Michael
 ___
 users mailing list
 users@xwiki.org
 http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/users

___
users mailing list
users@xwiki.org
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/users


Re: [xwiki-users] Using parameter macro in the js extension

2014-05-13 Thread Eduardo Abritta
Exactly. I'm needing initialize a value in the velocity environment and use it 
on the  javascript code.  it not needs to be dinamic.
I am trying to use the following code but the JS variable is returning 
undefined
 
 
Java Script Code
var param;
this.param=$xcontext.macro.params.parameter;
console.log(param);
 
Velocity (Macro)
 
 $xcontext.put(param, $xcontext.macro.params.parameter)

Some light?
 
ty


Atenciosamente,
Eduardo Abritta
e-mail: eduardo.abri...@outlook.com | 
 
 Date: Tue, 13 May 2014 10:05:17 +0200
 From: jeremie.bousq...@gmail.com
 To: users@xwiki.org
 Subject: Re: [xwiki-users] Using parameter macro in the js extension
 
 Hi,
 
 
 2014-05-13 8:40 GMT+02:00 Michael Bußler michael.buss...@googlemail.com:
 
  Hi, the velocity-code is executed on the server, while js-code runs on the
  client side, AFTER the macro-code was executed .
  You could try need to pass parameters to your macro via an URL parameter or
  http POST.
 
 
 Only if value needs to be refreshed without a page refresh. If value comes
 from a velocity macro, it's in the context of a page, so it's enough to
 initialize the javascript var from velocity (which is ok as velocity is
 executed before) - it's not supposed to be updated server-side after the
 page is rendered.
 Of course if it needs to be dynamic you could go ajax.
 Well my understanding of Eduardo is that he needs to initialize a value in
 javascript, based on a macro parameter passed to a velocity macro.
 
 
 
  Hope this helps!
 
  Best, Michael
  Am 12.05.2014 19:01 schrieb Eduardo Abritta eduardo.abri...@outlook.com
  :
 
   Hi Sirs,
  
   I am developing a macro in velocity (wiki macro) and need to use a
   parameter (wiki macro parameter) defined by the user in my java script
  code
   (java script extension). I tried  can several methods but it is not
  working.
  
   How can I do this?
  
  
  
  
   Atenciosamente,
   Eduardo Abritta
   e-mail: eduardo.abri...@outlook.com |
  
  
  
   ___
   users mailing list
   users@xwiki.org
   http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/users
  
  ___
  users mailing list
  users@xwiki.org
  http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/users
 
 ___
 users mailing list
 users@xwiki.org
 http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/users
  
___
users mailing list
users@xwiki.org
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/users


[xwiki-users] newsletter application seem to break xwikiUserSheet with flamingo skin

2014-05-13 Thread Pascal BASTIEN
Hello,

If I install newsletter extension on xwiki 6.0, my profil is display like this 
:-(
http://snag.gy/NY6p2.jpg

Thxs

Pascal B
___
users mailing list
users@xwiki.org
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/users


Re: [xwiki-users] Using parameter macro in the js extension

2014-05-13 Thread Caleb James DeLisle
This depends a lot on how the javascript is loaded...

If you're including it using $xwiki.jsx.use() then it won't have the same
context because it's a different HTTP request. If you use the macro and then
do a {{velocity}} macro with an {{html}} macro and a script inside of that,
the content will (should) be there.

Another solution is to pass the info in a parameter, eg:
$xwiki.jsx.use('My.Document', {param: $value})
and then in the jsx extension...

var PARAMETER_ONE = $escapetool.javascript($request.getParameter('param'));

Thanks,
Caleb


On 05/13/2014 03:28 PM, Eduardo Abritta wrote:
 Exactly. I'm needing initialize a value in the velocity environment and use 
 it on the  javascript code.  it not needs to be dinamic.
 I am trying to use the following code but the JS variable is returning 
 undefined
  
  
 Java Script Code
 var param;
 this.param=$xcontext.macro.params.parameter;
 console.log(param);
  
 Velocity (Macro)
  
  $xcontext.put(param, $xcontext.macro.params.parameter)
 
 Some light?
  
 ty
 
 
 Atenciosamente,
 Eduardo Abritta
 e-mail: eduardo.abri...@outlook.com | 
  
 Date: Tue, 13 May 2014 10:05:17 +0200
 From: jeremie.bousq...@gmail.com
 To: users@xwiki.org
 Subject: Re: [xwiki-users] Using parameter macro in the js extension

 Hi,


 2014-05-13 8:40 GMT+02:00 Michael Bußler michael.buss...@googlemail.com:

 Hi, the velocity-code is executed on the server, while js-code runs on the
 client side, AFTER the macro-code was executed .
 You could try need to pass parameters to your macro via an URL parameter or
 http POST.


 Only if value needs to be refreshed without a page refresh. If value comes
 from a velocity macro, it's in the context of a page, so it's enough to
 initialize the javascript var from velocity (which is ok as velocity is
 executed before) - it's not supposed to be updated server-side after the
 page is rendered.
 Of course if it needs to be dynamic you could go ajax.
 Well my understanding of Eduardo is that he needs to initialize a value in
 javascript, based on a macro parameter passed to a velocity macro.



 Hope this helps!

 Best, Michael
 Am 12.05.2014 19:01 schrieb Eduardo Abritta eduardo.abri...@outlook.com
 :

 Hi Sirs,

 I am developing a macro in velocity (wiki macro) and need to use a
 parameter (wiki macro parameter) defined by the user in my java script
 code
 (java script extension). I tried  can several methods but it is not
 working.

 How can I do this?




 Atenciosamente,
 Eduardo Abritta
 e-mail: eduardo.abri...@outlook.com |



 ___
 users mailing list
 users@xwiki.org
 http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/users

 ___
 users mailing list
 users@xwiki.org
 http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/users

 ___
 users mailing list
 users@xwiki.org
 http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/users
 
 ___
 users mailing list
 users@xwiki.org
 http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/users
 
___
users mailing list
users@xwiki.org
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/users


Re: [xwiki-users] Using parameter macro in the js extension

2014-05-13 Thread Jeremie BOUSQUET
2014-05-13 16:04 GMT+02:00 Caleb James DeLisle c...@cjdns.fr:

 This depends a lot on how the javascript is loaded...

 If you're including it using $xwiki.jsx.use() then it won't have the same
 context because it's a different HTTP request. If you use the macro and
 then
 do a {{velocity}} macro with an {{html}} macro and a script inside of
 that,
 the content will (should) be there.

 Another solution is to pass the info in a parameter, eg:
 $xwiki.jsx.use('My.Document', {param: $value})
 and then in the jsx extension...

 var PARAMETER_ONE =
 $escapetool.javascript($request.getParameter('param'));

 Thanks,
 Caleb


 On 05/13/2014 03:28 PM, Eduardo Abritta wrote:
  Exactly. I'm needing initialize a value in the velocity environment and
 use it on the  javascript code.  it not needs to be dinamic.
  I am trying to use the following code but the JS variable is returning
 undefined
 
 
  Java Script Code
  var param;
  this.param=$xcontext.macro.params.parameter;
  console.log(param);
 
  Velocity (Macro)
 
   $xcontext.put(param, $xcontext.macro.params.parameter)


Did you also check that this $param is correctly set a value in your
velocity code ?
The fact that param is undefined on javascript side is strange, if it
didn't find anything in the velocity context, it should contain exactly the
string '$xcontext.macro.params.parameter', not undefined.
So it seems to me it was found in the context, but it has null value.


  Some light?
 
  ty
 
 
  Atenciosamente,
  Eduardo Abritta
  e-mail: eduardo.abri...@outlook.com |
 
  Date: Tue, 13 May 2014 10:05:17 +0200
  From: jeremie.bousq...@gmail.com
  To: users@xwiki.org
  Subject: Re: [xwiki-users] Using parameter macro in the js extension
 
  Hi,
 
 
  2014-05-13 8:40 GMT+02:00 Michael Bußler 
 michael.buss...@googlemail.com:
 
  Hi, the velocity-code is executed on the server, while js-code runs on
 the
  client side, AFTER the macro-code was executed .
  You could try need to pass parameters to your macro via an URL
 parameter or
  http POST.
 
 
  Only if value needs to be refreshed without a page refresh. If value
 comes
  from a velocity macro, it's in the context of a page, so it's enough to
  initialize the javascript var from velocity (which is ok as velocity is
  executed before) - it's not supposed to be updated server-side after the
  page is rendered.
  Of course if it needs to be dynamic you could go ajax.
  Well my understanding of Eduardo is that he needs to initialize a value
 in
  javascript, based on a macro parameter passed to a velocity macro.
 
 
 
  Hope this helps!
 
  Best, Michael
  Am 12.05.2014 19:01 schrieb Eduardo Abritta 
 eduardo.abri...@outlook.com
  :
 
  Hi Sirs,
 
  I am developing a macro in velocity (wiki macro) and need to use a
  parameter (wiki macro parameter) defined by the user in my java script
  code
  (java script extension). I tried  can several methods but it is not
  working.
 
  How can I do this?
 
 
 
 
  Atenciosamente,
  Eduardo Abritta
  e-mail: eduardo.abri...@outlook.com |
 
 
 
  ___
  users mailing list
  users@xwiki.org
  http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/users
 
  ___
  users mailing list
  users@xwiki.org
  http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/users
 
  ___
  users mailing list
  users@xwiki.org
  http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/users
 
  ___
  users mailing list
  users@xwiki.org
  http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/users
 
 ___
 users mailing list
 users@xwiki.org
 http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/users

___
users mailing list
users@xwiki.org
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/users


[xwiki-users] Components, context and subwikis

2014-05-13 Thread Jeremie BOUSQUET
Hello,

I have some java components (@Singleton) that depend on old core. It is
bad, and I'm trying to move away from it, but I'll keep at least one
component like this - my own bridge.

I have this in initialize() of these components:

ExecutionContext context = execution.getContext();
this.context = (XWikiContext)
context.getProperty(xwikicontext);
this.xwiki = this.context.getWiki();

I realize that this worked well in the context of a mono-wiki, but in a
subwiki I wonder if it causes issues.
Here, ExecutionContext relates to the request (user action) at initialize()
time, so I suppose it's a sort of default execution context, related to
main wiki, right ?
So for example when xwiki.getDocument() is called, it looks after a
document in the main wiki - not in the (sub)wiki from which the component
method was called, right ?

Should I just call initialize() at the beginning of every method that needs
a correct context, in order to get a fresh execution context related to
correct wiki ?
Or should I pass the context from the script service, adding it as
parameter to all needed methods in my component ?

Thanks,
Jeremie
___
users mailing list
users@xwiki.org
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/users


Re: [xwiki-users] Components, context and subwikis

2014-05-13 Thread Thomas Mortagne
The ExecutionContext returned by execution.getContext(); comes from a
ThreadLocal which means it's not a singleton associated to the main
wiki but a new ExecutionContext generated for each http request.

By the way you should really use ProviderXWikiContext component instead.
___
users mailing list
users@xwiki.org
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/users


Re: [xwiki-users] Components, context and subwikis

2014-05-13 Thread Jeremie BOUSQUET
2014-05-13 17:53 GMT+02:00 Thomas Mortagne thomas.morta...@xwiki.com:

 The ExecutionContext returned by execution.getContext(); comes from a
 ThreadLocal which means it's not a singleton associated to the main
 wiki but a new ExecutionContext generated for each http request.


That is what I understood, but that means that for my component to operate
on correct wiki (in correct context), it should reassign his own context
member for each request - and not do it once at component initialization
time.



 By the way you should really use ProviderXWikiContext component instead.


I will, thanks. Does it have a different/better behaviour or is just the
preferred way ?


 ___
 users mailing list
 users@xwiki.org
 http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/users

___
users mailing list
users@xwiki.org
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/users


Re: [xwiki-users] Using parameter macro in the js extension

2014-05-13 Thread Eduardo Abritta
Caleb,

I did what do you say and it worked.
 
Thank you.

Atenciosamente,
Eduardo Abritta
e-mail: eduardo.abri...@outlook.com |


 
 Date: Tue, 13 May 2014 16:19:17 +0200
 From: jeremie.bousq...@gmail.com
 To: users@xwiki.org
 Subject: Re: [xwiki-users] Using parameter macro in the js extension
 
 2014-05-13 16:04 GMT+02:00 Caleb James DeLisle c...@cjdns.fr:
 
  This depends a lot on how the javascript is loaded...
 
  If you're including it using $xwiki.jsx.use() then it won't have the same
  context because it's a different HTTP request. If you use the macro and
  then
  do a {{velocity}} macro with an {{html}} macro and a script inside of
  that,
  the content will (should) be there.
 
  Another solution is to pass the info in a parameter, eg:
  $xwiki.jsx.use('My.Document', {param: $value})
  and then in the jsx extension...
 
  var PARAMETER_ONE =
  $escapetool.javascript($request.getParameter('param'));
 
  Thanks,
  Caleb
 
 
  On 05/13/2014 03:28 PM, Eduardo Abritta wrote:
   Exactly. I'm needing initialize a value in the velocity environment and
  use it on the  javascript code.  it not needs to be dinamic.
   I am trying to use the following code but the JS variable is returning
  undefined
  
  
   Java Script Code
   var param;
   this.param=$xcontext.macro.params.parameter;
   console.log(param);
  
   Velocity (Macro)
  
$xcontext.put(param, $xcontext.macro.params.parameter)
 
 
 Did you also check that this $param is correctly set a value in your
 velocity code ?
 The fact that param is undefined on javascript side is strange, if it
 didn't find anything in the velocity context, it should contain exactly the
 string '$xcontext.macro.params.parameter', not undefined.
 So it seems to me it was found in the context, but it has null value.
 
 
   Some light?
  
   ty
  
  
   Atenciosamente,
   Eduardo Abritta
   e-mail: eduardo.abri...@outlook.com |
  
   Date: Tue, 13 May 2014 10:05:17 +0200
   From: jeremie.bousq...@gmail.com
   To: users@xwiki.org
   Subject: Re: [xwiki-users] Using parameter macro in the js extension
  
   Hi,
  
  
   2014-05-13 8:40 GMT+02:00 Michael Bußler 
  michael.buss...@googlemail.com:
  
   Hi, the velocity-code is executed on the server, while js-code runs on
  the
   client side, AFTER the macro-code was executed .
   You could try need to pass parameters to your macro via an URL
  parameter or
   http POST.
  
  
   Only if value needs to be refreshed without a page refresh. If value
  comes
   from a velocity macro, it's in the context of a page, so it's enough to
   initialize the javascript var from velocity (which is ok as velocity is
   executed before) - it's not supposed to be updated server-side after the
   page is rendered.
   Of course if it needs to be dynamic you could go ajax.
   Well my understanding of Eduardo is that he needs to initialize a value
  in
   javascript, based on a macro parameter passed to a velocity macro.
  
  
  
   Hope this helps!
  
   Best, Michael
   Am 12.05.2014 19:01 schrieb Eduardo Abritta 
  eduardo.abri...@outlook.com
   :
  
   Hi Sirs,
  
   I am developing a macro in velocity (wiki macro) and need to use a
   parameter (wiki macro parameter) defined by the user in my java script
   code
   (java script extension). I tried  can several methods but it is not
   working.
  
   How can I do this?
  
  
  
  
   Atenciosamente,
   Eduardo Abritta
   e-mail: eduardo.abri...@outlook.com |
  
  
  
   ___
   users mailing list
   users@xwiki.org
   http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/users
  
   ___
   users mailing list
   users@xwiki.org
   http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/users
  
   ___
   users mailing list
   users@xwiki.org
   http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/users
  
   ___
   users mailing list
   users@xwiki.org
   http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/users
  
  ___
  users mailing list
  users@xwiki.org
  http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/users
 
 ___
 users mailing list
 users@xwiki.org
 http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/users
  
___
users mailing list
users@xwiki.org
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/users


Re: [xwiki-users] Components, context and subwikis

2014-05-13 Thread Thomas Mortagne
On Tue, May 13, 2014 at 6:29 PM, Jeremie BOUSQUET
jeremie.bousq...@gmail.com wrote:
 2014-05-13 17:53 GMT+02:00 Thomas Mortagne thomas.morta...@xwiki.com:

 The ExecutionContext returned by execution.getContext(); comes from a
 ThreadLocal which means it's not a singleton associated to the main
 wiki but a new ExecutionContext generated for each http request.


 That is what I understood, but that means that for my component to operate
 on correct wiki (in correct context), it should reassign his own context
 member for each request - and not do it once at component initialization
 time.

I'm not sure I understand, are you talking about storing the
XWikiContext in your component instance at init ?

The XWikiContext should never ever be stored, instead you should
always request the current one when you need it. Among other things
the XWikiContext is not thread safe at all and is supposed to always
be used in the Thread it's been created for.




 By the way you should really use ProviderXWikiContext component instead.


 I will, thanks. Does it have a different/better behaviour or is just the
 preferred way ?


 ___
 users mailing list
 users@xwiki.org
 http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/users

 ___
 users mailing list
 users@xwiki.org
 http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/users



-- 
Thomas Mortagne
___
users mailing list
users@xwiki.org
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/users


Re: [xwiki-users] Components, context and subwikis

2014-05-13 Thread Jeremie BOUSQUET
2014-05-13 19:10 GMT+02:00 Thomas Mortagne thomas.morta...@xwiki.com:

 On Tue, May 13, 2014 at 6:29 PM, Jeremie BOUSQUET
 jeremie.bousq...@gmail.com wrote:
  2014-05-13 17:53 GMT+02:00 Thomas Mortagne thomas.morta...@xwiki.com:
 
  The ExecutionContext returned by execution.getContext(); comes from a
  ThreadLocal which means it's not a singleton associated to the main
  wiki but a new ExecutionContext generated for each http request.
 
 
  That is what I understood, but that means that for my component to
 operate
  on correct wiki (in correct context), it should reassign his own
 context
  member for each request - and not do it once at component initialization
  time.

 I'm not sure I understand, are you talking about storing the
 XWikiContext in your component instance at init ?


Yes in fact it's what I did (the this.context =  in my sample code). I
realize that I didn't think about it so much when I did it :)



 The XWikiContext should never ever be stored, instead you should
 always request the current one when you need it. Among other things
 the XWikiContext is not thread safe at all and is supposed to always
 be used in the Thread it's been created for.


Here I have to apologize because we already had this discussion here, and
you already suggested to use ProviderXWikiContext, but I completely
forgot about it.

I suggest that the component tutorial could be updated around this context
stuff ?
http://platform.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/DevGuide/WritingComponents#HTheXWikicontext

I would propose to replace:

If you still need to access the old XWiki context, then you can get a
reference to it from the execution context, but you should not cast it to
an XWikiContext, which would pull the whole xwiki-core as a dependency, but
to a Map. You won't be able to access all the properties, like the current
user name or the URL factory, but you can access anything placed in the
internal map of the XWikiContext.

By:

If you still need to access the old XWiki context, then you can get a
reference to it from an injected XWikiContext Provider, but you should not
cast it to an XWikiContext, which would pull the whole xwiki-core as a
dependency, but to a Map. You won't be able to access all the properties,
like the current user name or the URL factory, but you can access anything
placed in the internal map of the XWikiContext.

And to replace the sample code by:


/** Provides access to the XWiki context. Injected by the Component
Manager. */
@Inject
private ProviderXWikiContext xcontextProvider;

[...]

private void workWithTheContext()
 {
MapObject, Object xwikiContext = (MapObject, Object)
xcontextProvider.get();
// Do something with the XWiki context
 }




 
 
 
  By the way you should really use ProviderXWikiContext component
 instead.
 
 
  I will, thanks. Does it have a different/better behaviour or is just the
  preferred way ?
 
 
  ___
  users mailing list
  users@xwiki.org
  http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/users
 
  ___
  users mailing list
  users@xwiki.org
  http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/users



 --
 Thomas Mortagne
 ___
 users mailing list
 users@xwiki.org
 http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/users

___
users mailing list
users@xwiki.org
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/users


Re: [xwiki-users] Components, context and subwikis

2014-05-13 Thread Thomas Mortagne
On Tue, May 13, 2014 at 9:04 PM, Jeremie BOUSQUET
jeremie.bousq...@gmail.com wrote:
 2014-05-13 19:10 GMT+02:00 Thomas Mortagne thomas.morta...@xwiki.com:

 On Tue, May 13, 2014 at 6:29 PM, Jeremie BOUSQUET
 jeremie.bousq...@gmail.com wrote:
  2014-05-13 17:53 GMT+02:00 Thomas Mortagne thomas.morta...@xwiki.com:
 
  The ExecutionContext returned by execution.getContext(); comes from a
  ThreadLocal which means it's not a singleton associated to the main
  wiki but a new ExecutionContext generated for each http request.
 
 
  That is what I understood, but that means that for my component to
 operate
  on correct wiki (in correct context), it should reassign his own
 context
  member for each request - and not do it once at component initialization
  time.

 I'm not sure I understand, are you talking about storing the
 XWikiContext in your component instance at init ?


 Yes in fact it's what I did (the this.context =  in my sample code). I
 realize that I didn't think about it so much when I did it :)



 The XWikiContext should never ever be stored, instead you should
 always request the current one when you need it. Among other things
 the XWikiContext is not thread safe at all and is supposed to always
 be used in the Thread it's been created for.


 Here I have to apologize because we already had this discussion here, and
 you already suggested to use ProviderXWikiContext, but I completely
 forgot about it.

 I suggest that the component tutorial could be updated around this context
 stuff ?
 http://platform.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/DevGuide/WritingComponents#HTheXWikicontext

 I would propose to replace:

 If you still need to access the old XWiki context, then you can get a
 reference to it from the execution context, but you should not cast it to
 an XWikiContext, which would pull the whole xwiki-core as a dependency, but
 to a Map. You won't be able to access all the properties, like the current
 user name or the URL factory, but you can access anything placed in the
 internal map of the XWikiContext.

 By:

 If you still need to access the old XWiki context, then you can get a
 reference to it from an injected XWikiContext Provider, but you should not
 cast it to an XWikiContext, which would pull the whole xwiki-core as a
 dependency, but to a Map.

This is not going to be very easy since you have to know the
XWikiContext class to use that Provider ;)

 You won't be able to access all the properties,
 like the current user name or the URL factory, but you can access anything
 placed in the internal map of the XWikiContext.

 And to replace the sample code by:

 
 /** Provides access to the XWiki context. Injected by the Component
 Manager. */
 @Inject
 private ProviderXWikiContext xcontextProvider;

 [...]

 private void workWithTheContext()
  {
 MapObject, Object xwikiContext = (MapObject, Object)
 xcontextProvider.get();
 // Do something with the XWiki context
  }




 
 
 
  By the way you should really use ProviderXWikiContext component
 instead.
 
 
  I will, thanks. Does it have a different/better behaviour or is just the
  preferred way ?
 
 
  ___
  users mailing list
  users@xwiki.org
  http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/users
 
  ___
  users mailing list
  users@xwiki.org
  http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/users



 --
 Thomas Mortagne
 ___
 users mailing list
 users@xwiki.org
 http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/users

 ___
 users mailing list
 users@xwiki.org
 http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/users



-- 
Thomas Mortagne
___
users mailing list
users@xwiki.org
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/users


Re: [xwiki-users] Annotations

2014-05-13 Thread Michael Bußler
Hi Anca,

My XWiki (www.wikiderm.de) is build up like a encyclopedia and consists of
entry pages, which I'm using a custom class called EntryClass.
The class object stores the entries title, letter and the actual entry text
(entry), which is just plain XWiki 2.0 syntax enriched with custom style
classes like

(% class=Level-1 %)
...
(% class=Level-2 %)
...
including a custom image macro: {{zoombox Bilder=... /}}.

Here is an example of how the entry text might look like:
(% class=Ebene-1 %)
(% class=Bullet %)-(%%) Mangel an Nikotinsäureamid

(% class=Eintrag-2 %)
(% class=Feature %)KL:(%%) lange schwarze Papillae filiformes {{zoombox
Bilder=Klinik, Lingua villosa nigra.jpg Autoren=Sören Rabenhorst
Institute=Hautärzte am Markt Orte=Dortmund /}}

So, no HTML here, except for the macro, which of course renders to HTML.

The EntrySheet for the EntryClass includes some script code via JSX and CSS
via SSX and then just renders the entry class property via:

{{velocity}}$xwiki.ssx.use(...)$xwiki.jsx.use(...)$doc.display(entry){{/velocity}}
(This needs to be a one-liner, otherwise I get unwanted extra line-breaks
in the rendered output)

I've added an annotation at http://www.wikiderm.de/Kompendium/BCG-Vakzine,
so you can check the improper rendering. :-)
Annotations are not shown by default. The XWki 5.4.4 was installed from
scratch, so no clutter from updating or scattered versions.

Thank you for your help!!

Michael


2014-05-13 13:37 GMT+02:00 Anca Luca lu...@xwiki.com:

 Hello Michael,

 there is a chance that this is a standard issue, but it also depends on
 what you're trying to do.

 The main limitation of the annotations is that they are not working on
 content rendered with the {{html}} macro, because they are rendered at the
 XDOM Level and the html macro is not parsed in the XDOM. So if your sheet
 does everything in a html macro, than chances are it won't work. If your
 sheet is rendering using the xwiki syntax, then stuff should work fine.

 Can you describe a bit more in detail your problem? or if you have an
 online server, show us there what's happening? is your sheet custom? can
 you show the code of your sheet? a screenshot of isn't rendering
 properly?

 Anca


 On Tue, May 13, 2014 at 8:38 AM, Michael Bußler 
 michael.buss...@googlemail.com wrote:

  Hi there,
 
  I observed the Annotation-code in XWiki is having problems with the
 general
  approach of having a document-class rendered by a class-specific sheet.
  E.g. the highlighting of text passages isn't rendering properly.
  Is this a general limitation or am I doing something wrong with the
  classes' sheet? It's more or less a listing of textfields fed by class
  properties.
 
  Best, Michael
  ___
  users mailing list
  users@xwiki.org
  http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/users
 
 ___
 users mailing list
 users@xwiki.org
 http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/users




-- 
Dipl.-Inf. Michael Bußler
Forststr. 24
74379 Ingersheim

Email: michael.buss...@googlemail.com
Tel: +49 7142 70 92 309
Mobil: +49 176 219 55 940
Web: www.michael-bussler.de
___
users mailing list
users@xwiki.org
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/users