Re: [xwiki-users] Xwiki file and attachment storage

2007-11-16 Thread bjquinn


vmassol wrote:
 
 However I'm curious to know why you need attachments stored in the  
 file system.
 

Because many of these attachments may be large (50MB), and over time the
database can grow to be unweildy.  Currently that's our problem with our
exchange server setup (people keep emailing these files back and forth as it
stands now *shudder*).  The upside of storing attachments in a filesystem is
easier access from other clients (as the other poster suggested), less
likelihood of corruption on large databases (our Exchange DB is 200+ GB
right now), less likelihood of backup problems, copy-only-what's-changed
backups, and quicker backup and restore time.
-- 
View this message in context: 
http://www.nabble.com/Xwiki-file-and-attachment-storage-tf4214945.html#a13799175
Sent from the XWiki- Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

___
users mailing list
users@xwiki.org
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/users


Re: [xwiki-users] Xwiki file and attachment storage

2007-10-31 Thread Your XEN ICT Team - Ricardo Rodriguez
Vincent Massol wrote:
 Definitely. For this use case, webdav support would probably be the  
 best. We have jira issues opened for this but nobody has implemented  
 it yet AFAIK. I guess if the JCR implementation also supports Webdav  
 that should work too.

 -Vincent

 ___
 users mailing list
 users@xwiki.org
 http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/users
   
Thanks, Vincent. I'll search and keep track of these issues. 
Unfortunately I'm still far from being able to contribute to such an 
effort. But keep trying hard!

Cheers,

-- 
Ricardo Rodríguez
Your XEN ICT Team

___
users mailing list
users@xwiki.org
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/users


Re: [xwiki-users] Xwiki file and attachment storage

2007-10-30 Thread bjquinn

   Is that what you mean?  And is this Jackrabbit
 stuff ready by v1.1?

Nope. This is 1.2 stuff.

Well, 1.2 is almost here... is the jackrabbit stuff ready, and can I store
attachments in files??
-- 
View this message in context: 
http://www.nabble.com/Xwiki-file-and-attachment-storage-tf4214945.html#a13494689
Sent from the XWiki- Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

___
users mailing list
users@xwiki.org
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/users


Re: [xwiki-users] Xwiki file and attachment storage

2007-10-30 Thread Vincent Massol
Hi,

On Oct 30, 2007, at 9:03 PM, bjquinn wrote:


  Is that what you mean?  And is this Jackrabbit
 stuff ready by v1.1?

 Nope. This is 1.2 stuff.

 Well, 1.2 is almost here... is the jackrabbit stuff ready, and can I  
 store
 attachments in files??

Sorry but no. The scope for 1.2 was changed a long time ago. More  
importantly Artem who was working on it has stopped participating to  
XWiki for some time since he's busy on other stuff. He'll join us back  
later but there's no ETA right now on the JCR implementation.

However I'm curious to know why you need attachments stored in the  
file system.

Thanks
-Vincent

___
users mailing list
users@xwiki.org
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/users


Re: [xwiki-users] Xwiki file and attachment storage

2007-10-30 Thread Your XEN ICT Team - Ricardo Rodriguez
Vincent Massol wrote:
 Sorry but no. The scope for 1.2 was changed a long time ago. More  
 importantly Artem who was working on it has stopped participating to  
 XWiki for some time since he's busy on other stuff. He'll join us back  
 later but there's no ETA right now on the JCR implementation.

 However I'm curious to know why you need attachments stored in the  
 file system.

 Thanks
 -Vincent
Sorry if jumping in this thread is not the most elegant way of 
collaborate, but I've missed this option, to store attachments in the 
file system, today.

For instance: we use a lot of high resolution pictures in our work. If I 
can store this images in the file system I can access them by using 
regular drive mapping, web server access, sftp,... I mean: I could 
keep relying on different clients to read the files while I could rely 
on XWiki to easy the way users load files in the system.

Hope this makes sense for you.

Cheers,

Ricardo

-- 
Ricardo Rodríguez
Your XEN ICT Team

___
users mailing list
users@xwiki.org
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/users


Re: [xwiki-users] Xwiki file and attachment storage

2007-08-30 Thread bjquinn


http://jackrabbit.apache.org/faq.html#whats-fs wrote:
 
  What is a Jackrabbit file system?
 
 A Jackrabbbit file system (FS) is an internal component that
 implements standard file system operations on top of some underlying
 storage mechanism (a normal file system, a database, a webdav server, or a
 custom file format). A file system component is any Java class that
 implements the FileSystem interface and the associated behavioural
 contracts. File systems are used in Jackrabbit both as subcomponents of
 the persistence managers and for general storage needs (for example to
 store the full text indexes). 
 

So does this mean that I will be able to mount the xwiki database as a
filesystem or something?  Is that what you mean?  And is this Jackrabbit
stuff ready by v1.1?

(Please excuse my ignorance!  I'm a bit weak when it comes to Java!!!)

-BJ
-- 
View this message in context: 
http://www.nabble.com/Xwiki-file-and-attachment-storage-tf4214945.html#a12409445
Sent from the XWiki- Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

___
users mailing list
users@xwiki.org
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/users


Re: [xwiki-users] Xwiki file and attachment storage

2007-08-30 Thread Vincent Massol

On Aug 30, 2007, at 5:19 PM, bjquinn wrote:



 http://jackrabbit.apache.org/faq.html#whats-fs wrote:

  What is a Jackrabbit file system?

 A Jackrabbbit file system (FS) is an internal component that
 implements standard file system operations on top of some underlying
 storage mechanism (a normal file system, a database, a webdav  
 server, or a
 custom file format). A file system component is any Java class that
 implements the FileSystem interface and the associated behavioural
 contracts. File systems are used in Jackrabbit both as  
 subcomponents of
 the persistence managers and for general storage needs (for  
 example to
 store the full text indexes).


 So does this mean that I will be able to mount the xwiki database as a
 filesystem or something?

There won't be a xwiki database any more. All the data will be stored  
through the JCR implementation we use. It'll be up to you to decide  
what you want the JCR implementation to point to through configuration.

I mentioned Jackrabbit because this is what our proof of concept uses  
but we might use eXo Platform, JackRabbit or some other  
implementation. XWiki will use the JCR API so it can use any JCR  
implementation (theoretically at least).

   Is that what you mean?  And is this Jackrabbit
 stuff ready by v1.1?

Nope. This is 1.2 stuff.

-Vincent

___
users mailing list
users@xwiki.org
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/users