[vchkpw] qmail+vpopmail+autoresponder2.0.5
Hi all, I'm using set of software as in topic. I've got line my.domain:my.domain line in virtualdomains file in qmail control dir. My virual domain is also default domain. Reply message going from autorespond has sender address as [EMAIL PROTECTED] which is definitely wrong. Line included in dotqmail causing autoreply to work contains $ as the last sing. If I use + instead of $ sign autoreply message goes with empty sender address which is also not acceptable for me. How to get autorespond working properly, that's mean with correct sender address set which should be recipient address of original message indeed. Thanks for help in advance. Greetings macz begin:vcard fn:Mariusz Czarnecki n:Czarnecki;Mariusz org:PreVac Sp. z o.o.;Electronic Department adr:;;Raciborska 61;Rogow;Slask;44-362;Polska email;internet:[EMAIL PROTECTED] title:IT Specialist tel;work:+48 32 4 512 511 tel;fax:+48 32 4 512 512 tel;cell:+48 606616390 url:http://www.prevac.pl version:2.1 end:vcard
Re: [vchkpw] just noticed something with chkuser ....
On Thu, 25 Nov 2004, tonix (Antonio Nati) wrote: I'll follow this suggestion: keeping all non RFC options commented (exclude format control, exclude MX control, accept NULL sender, etc.), and improving documentation. Here's another feature request for you... I assume some ISPs here use vpopmail and also need to do backup mx for customers who run their own mailservers. Without the chkuser patch, simply adding those customer domains to morercpthosts would allow us to relay for them. With chkuser, anything out of vpopmail's control is going to be rejected. How about a config file somewhere (not sure what's most appropriate) where one could add additional domains that we wish to relay for? thanks, Charles Thanks, Tonino -Jeremy -- Jeremy Kitchen ++ Systems Administrator ++ Inter7 Internet Technologies, Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] ++ www.inter7.com ++ 866.528.3530 ++ 815.776.9465 int'l kitchen @ #qmail #gentoo on EFnet IRC ++ scriptkitchen.com/qmail GnuPG Key ID: 481BF7E2 ++ jabber:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [vchkpw] just noticed something with chkuser ....
Charles Sprickman wrote: On Thu, 25 Nov 2004, tonix (Antonio Nati) wrote: I'll follow this suggestion: keeping all non RFC options commented (exclude format control, exclude MX control, accept NULL sender, etc.), and improving documentation. Here's another feature request for you... I assume some ISPs here use vpopmail and also need to do backup mx for customers who run their own mailservers. Without the chkuser patch, simply adding those customer domains to morercpthosts would allow us to relay for them. With chkuser, anything out of vpopmail's control is going to be rejected. How about a config file somewhere (not sure what's most appropriate) where one could add additional domains that we wish to relay for? Eh ? No it doesn't. Only domains listed in virtualhosts get checked for valid email address's. You can list your secondary MX's in (more)rcpthosts and smtproutes and they don't get blocked by chkuser. At least they don't here and we are secondary MX for about 80 domains. Regards, Rick
Re: [vchkpw] just noticed something with chkuser ....
On Fri, 26 Nov 2004, Rick Macdougall wrote: I assume some ISPs here use vpopmail and also need to do backup mx for customers who run their own mailservers. Without the chkuser patch, simply adding those customer domains to morercpthosts would allow us to relay for them. With chkuser, anything out of vpopmail's control is going to be rejected. How about a config file somewhere (not sure what's most appropriate) where one could add additional domains that we wish to relay for? Eh ? No it doesn't. Only domains listed in virtualhosts get checked for valid email address's. You can list your secondary MX's in (more)rcpthosts and smtproutes and they don't get blocked by chkuser. At least they don't here and we are secondary MX for about 80 domains. Huh. How about that? I don't think it uses virtualdomains though, as I (on purpose) don't have that file on the machine backing up my main vpopmail mxer. Thanks, Charles Regards, Rick
