Re: [vchkpw] SENDER_NOCHECK Question
At 22.35 22/06/2005, you wrote: Does SENDER_NOCHECK=1 in tcp.smtp mean that all aspects of chkuser get bypassed when coming from that specific IP? No. It means that no check is done on sender e-mail address (formal check on address). I've been trying to implement this feature and having trouble getting any entry in tcp.smtp to bypass the chkuser rules. My current tcp.smtp is 127.:allow,RELAYCLIENT= 192.168.0.:allow,RELAYCLIENT=,SENDER_NOCHECK=1 x.x.x.x:allow,RELAYCLIENT=,SENDER_NOCHECK=1 If I send to a bogus recipient from one of those IPs I still get the typical chkuser response that recipient doesn't exist. I guess I would have expected it to bypass chkuser and bounce telling me that user doesn't exist. Is this incorrect logic? You could try defining and using CHKUSER_START = NONE, that would exclude any chkuser check. You could define a general CHKUSER_START = DOMAIN (or ALWAYS), using then the variable CHKUSER_START = NONE inside tcp.smtp for senders which are excluded from all chkuser features. I did not think of it inside tcp.smtp, but it may fit your needs, try it. (Be careful to enable all needed #defines, like #CHKUSER_STARTING_VARIABLE). Tonino Thanks. Anthony
Re: [vchkpw] SENDER_NOCHECK Question
tonix (Antonio Nati) wrote: At 22.35 22/06/2005, you wrote: Does SENDER_NOCHECK=1 in tcp.smtp mean that all aspects of chkuser get bypassed when coming from that specific IP? No. It means that no check is done on sender e-mail address (formal check on address). I've been trying to implement this feature and having trouble getting any entry in tcp.smtp to bypass the chkuser rules. My current tcp.smtp is 127.:allow,RELAYCLIENT= 192.168.0.:allow,RELAYCLIENT=,SENDER_NOCHECK=1 x.x.x.x:allow,RELAYCLIENT=,SENDER_NOCHECK=1 If I send to a bogus recipient from one of those IPs I still get the typical chkuser response that recipient doesn't exist. I guess I would have expected it to bypass chkuser and bounce telling me that user doesn't exist. Is this incorrect logic? You could try defining and using CHKUSER_START = NONE, that would exclude any chkuser check. You could define a general CHKUSER_START = DOMAIN (or ALWAYS), using then the variable CHKUSER_START = NONE inside tcp.smtp for senders which are excluded from all chkuser features. I did not think of it inside tcp.smtp, but it may fit your needs, try it. (Be careful to enable all needed #defines, like #CHKUSER_STARTING_VARIABLE). Tonino Thanks. Anthony Thanks very much for the reply. It makes perfect sense with your suggestions. I'll give it a try. Anthony
[vchkpw] Safely Remove And Replace Postmaster Accounts?
Greetings, I've got several Vdomains where for whatever reason, postmaster account quotas were bypassed and now postmaster inboxes are over 1 gig. Is it possible to safely nuke these accounts and immediately recreate them to clear their inboxes out? TIA, --Duncan
Re: [vchkpw] Safely Remove And Replace Postmaster Accounts?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
| Greetings,
|
| I've got several Vdomains where for whatever reason, postmaster account
| quotas were bypassed and now postmaster inboxes are over 1 gig.
You may just want to go ahead and create .qmail-postmaster file with
a single hash mark ('#') in it. This will allow the postmaster account
to exist, and thus be usable via qmailadmin, etc, while not collecting
mail.
|
| Is it possible to safely nuke these accounts and immediately recreate
| them to clear their inboxes out?
Yes, however, you might want to double check postmaster settings
before going and re-creating the account. Some of these settings
carry over to new users, and if you use that functionality, you'll
want to be sure new users get the same settings as users who were
added before the re-creation.
|
| TIA,
|
| --Duncan
|
|
|
- --
/*
~Matt Brookings [EMAIL PROTECTED] GnuPG Key 7D7E5F37
~Software developer Systems technician
~Inter7 Internet Technologies, Inc. (815)776-9465
*/
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFCuwyg/pZz8n1+XzcRAuTGAJ4k1RIS7rJzoFroBeoGGEKuvxco3QCeKRDr
Cz3/JuNWbmngbl7sLFS9u3k=
=cVkV
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
[vchkpw] received email doesn't go into vpopmail accounts
hi i had a new Fedora Core 2 dedicated server that i put plesk on at goDaddy. All worked but I was getting tons of spam - on my previous box all this was handled via cpanel/exim/spamassassin so the qty of spam didn't bother me. I had the hardest time getting QmailRocks to work - got stuck on the qmail-scanner step. I really needed spamassassin and i actually bought it from Plesk, but it wouldn't work so i dumped/uninstalled all the qmail/qmailrocks stuff i could find and started over. i trashed all that and reloaded qmail per LWQ. if i send myself an email from my yahoo account, then it goes to my local Maildir file in a directory i setup under Plesk... when i created myself as a webmail user long ago. so something is still running from the plesk side, and i think thats why i can't get vpopmail to work. qmailctl reports that its only up 0 or 1 seconds - hey, i went through this long enough on the QMailRocks path to see the log and know that the problem is that vpopmail can't start... again, because the original pop system (whatever is was that Plesk injected) is still running. But i don't know how to stop it. At least I can get email by going to my server and do a mail -f Maildir, but nothing ever shows up in any of the directories in the /home/vpopmail/domains/example.com/username/Maildir style that were created by QmailAdmin. here's my LOG processes: qmaill 17247 0.0 0.0 1776 328 ?S Jun22 0:00 /usr/local/bin/multilog t /var/log/qmail/smtpd qmaill 17251 0.0 0.0 2300 268 ?S Jun22 0:00 /usr/local/bin/multilog t /var/log/qmail/pop3d qmaill 19181 0.0 0.0 2020 328 ?S Jun22 0:01 /usr/local/bin/multilog t /var/log/qmail/send here's the supervise processes: root 2191 0.0 0.0 1984 272 ?S Jun17 0:00 supervise qmail-smtpd root 2192 0.0 0.0 1872 272 ?S Jun17 0:00 supervise log root 2194 0.0 0.0 2192 272 ?S Jun17 0:00 supervise log root 2195 0.0 0.0 2228 272 ?S Jun17 0:13 supervise qmail-pop3d root 2196 0.0 0.0 2572 272 ?S Jun17 0:00 supervise log root 6410 0.0 0.0 2728 272 ?S Jun17 0:00 supervise qmail-send qmail processes: qmails 17378 0.0 0.0 2388 364 ?S Jun22 0:02 qmail-send root 17380 0.0 0.0 2644 308 ?S Jun22 0:00 qmail-lspawn ./Maildir qmailr 17381 0.0 0.0 2072 316 ?S Jun22 0:00 qmail-rspawn qmailq 17382 0.0 0.0 2624 300 ?S Jun22 0:00 qmail-clean and these two tcpserver processes: root 13600 0.0 0.0 2004 476 ?S Jun17 0:00 /usr/local/bin/tcpserver -H -R 0 pop3 /var/qmail/bin/qmail-popup mail.jaymer.com /home/vpopmail/bin/vchkpw /var/qmail/bin/qmail-pop3d Maildir qmaild 17245 0.0 0.0 2660 484 ?S Jun22 0:00 /usr/local/bin/tcpserver -v -R -l mail.jaymer.com -x /etc/tcp.smtp.cdb -c 20 -u 2020 -g 2020 0 smtp /var/qmail/bin/qmail-smtpd and qmailctl reports: /service/qmail-send: up (pid 17378) 117117 seconds /service/qmail-send/log: up (pid 19181) 116268 seconds /service/qmail-smtpd: up (pid 17245) 117164 seconds /service/qmail-smtpd/log: up (pid 17247) 117164 seconds /service/qmail-pop3d: up (pid 29087) 0 seconds /service/qmail-pop3d/log: up (pid 17251) 117164 seconds messages in queue: 0 messages in queue but not yet preprocessed: 0 i know that something pop3-related is running, cause my windows mail client can hit the server successfully... but there is nothing in any mailbox to retrieve. so, can anyone help me go about some steps to find out how to get vpopmail to start... or what else is running thats conflicting with its port already being in use. thanks a bunch jaymer...
